about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,704 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Orlando and the second variable is Wind power generated in Kosovo.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The smog from Orlando somehow formed a supercharged jet stream that boosted the wind turbines in Kosovo. It's like Orlando accidentally became the world's most eco-friendly fan, just by having really bad air!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover featuring a split scene juxtaposing Orlando and Kosovo. In the Orlando section, illustrate a hazy, smoggy skyline with people wearing face masks. Contrast this with the Kosovo section showing wind turbines spinning rapidly against a clear, blue sky, symbolizing clean and sustainable wind power generation. Capture the striking difference in environmental conditions through vibrant and contrasting imagery. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Poor air quality in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Cute 2D animation Parallax art Cyber folk A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Poor air quality in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Orlando, the air is hazy and smoggy, with people wearing face masks to protect themselves from the poor air quality. Meanwhile, in Kosovo, wind turbines are spinning rapidly, generating clean and sustainable wind power for the region.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Orlando, the air is hazy and smoggy, with people wearing face masks to protect themselves from the poor air quality. Meanwhile, in Kosovo, wind turbines are spinning rapidly, generating clean and sustainable wind power for the region. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover featuring a split scene juxtaposing Orlando and Kosovo. In the Orlando section, illustrate a hazy, smoggy skyline with people wearing face masks. Contrast this with the Kosovo section showing wind turbines spinning rapidly against a clear, blue sky, symbolizing clean and sustainable wind power generation. Capture the striking difference in environmental conditions through vibrant and contrasting imagery.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Orlando caused Wind power generated in Kosovo to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation

The Journal of Atmospheric Quirks and Eclectic Climate Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution and wind power generation! These two seem like a real breeze to study, don't they? Well, our research ventured into uncharted territory to explore the unlikely association between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this topic with a gust of determination, seeking to unearth any correlations between the two factors.

Our findings revealed a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592. This robust statistical relationship left us breathless! It seems that even across continents, the winds of change carry more than just fresh air - they also bear the potential for renewable energy.

So, why did the wind turbine break up with its partner? It just had too many trust issues - it couldn't handle the air pollution blowing hot and cold! But on a serious note, our research highlights the importance of considering intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. This surprising relationship serves as a strong gust of evidence for the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental systems, blowing down barriers between seemingly disparate regions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution and wind power generation! These two seem like a real breeze to study, don't they? Well, our research ventured into uncharted territory to explore the unlikely association between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this topic with a gust of determination, seeking to unearth any correlations between the two factors.

Our findings revealed a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592. This robust statistical relationship left us breathless! It seems that even across continents, the winds of change carry more than just fresh air - they also bear the potential for renewable energy.

So, why did the wind turbine break up with its partner? It just had too many trust issues - it couldn't handle the air pollution blowing hot and cold! But on a serious note, our research highlights the importance of considering intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. This surprising relationship serves as a strong gust of evidence for the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental systems, blowing down barriers between seemingly disparate regions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the demand for renewable energy continues to blow up, researchers are constantly seeking innovative ways to harness the power of nature, and perhaps even crack a few wind-related jokes along the way. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. It's a tale of two cities, united by statistical analysis and the zephyrs of data, that left us wondering - could this be a case of love at first wind?

Why did the statistician go to the eye doctor? Because they couldn’t see the forest plot for the trees! Statistical analysis may not always be the wind beneath our wings, but it was the tool we used to uncover the surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research aims to blow away any doubts about the significance of intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies.

We begin our journey by examining the environmental characteristics in Orlando, a city known for its warm climate and theme park thrills, but also for its contributions to air pollution levels. Meanwhile, in Kosovo, wind power generation has been gaining momentum, like a swirling vortex of renewable energy potential. Who would've thought that a research paper could sound like a thrilling adventure tale, right?

Our data analysis transcended borders, just like a gust of wind carrying the potential for change. The statistical correlation we uncovered between Orlando air stagnation and Kosovo wind generation is nothing short of a marvel. It’s as if the winds of fate brought these two variables together, leaving us in awe of the intricate dance of environmental influences across the globe.

Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Well, in our case, data made up the foundation of our research, allowing us to unravel the interplay between air pollution and wind power generation. As we present our findings, we invite readers to join us in this whirlwind of discovery, where statistical analysis meets environmental impact in a partnership as unpredictable as the wind itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution and wind power generation! These two seem like a real breeze to study, don't they? Well, our research ventured into uncharted territory to explore the unlikely association between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this topic with a gust of determination, seeking to unearth any correlations between the two factors.

Our findings revealed a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592. This robust statistical relationship left us breathless! It seems that even across continents, the winds of change carry more than just fresh air - they also bear the potential for renewable energy.

So, why did the wind turbine break up with its partner? It just had too many trust issues - it couldn't handle the air pollution blowing hot and cold! But on a serious note, our research highlights the importance of considering intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. This surprising relationship serves as a strong gust of evidence for the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental systems, blowing down barriers between seemingly disparate regions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the demand for renewable energy continues to blow up, researchers are constantly seeking innovative ways to harness the power of nature, and perhaps even crack a few wind-related jokes along the way. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. It's a tale of two cities, united by statistical analysis and the zephyrs of data, that left us wondering - could this be a case of love at first wind?
Why did the statistician go to the eye doctor? Because they couldn’t see the forest plot for the trees! Statistical analysis may not always be the wind beneath our wings, but it was the tool we used to uncover the surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research aims to blow away any doubts about the significance of intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies.
We begin our journey by examining the environmental characteristics in Orlando, a city known for its warm climate and theme park thrills, but also for its contributions to air pollution levels. Meanwhile, in Kosovo, wind power generation has been gaining momentum, like a swirling vortex of renewable energy potential. Who would've thought that a research paper could sound like a thrilling adventure tale, right?
Our data analysis transcended borders, just like a gust of wind carrying the potential for change. The statistical correlation we uncovered between Orlando air stagnation and Kosovo wind generation is nothing short of a marvel. It’s as if the winds of fate brought these two variables together, leaving us in awe of the intricate dance of environmental influences across the globe.
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Well, in our case, data made up the foundation of our research, allowing us to unravel the interplay between air pollution and wind power generation. As we present our findings, we invite readers to join us in this whirlwind of discovery, where statistical analysis meets environmental impact in a partnership as unpredictable as the wind itself.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several formal inquiries into the relationship between air pollution levels and wind power generation have laid the groundwork for our exploration of the unusual pairing of Orlando air stagnation and Kosovo wind energy. Smith and Doe, in their seminal work "Environmental Impacts of Air Pollution," underscore the detrimental effects of airborne pollutants on atmospheric conditions, setting the stage for our investigation into the potential ramifications on wind patterns. Jones, in "Renewable Energy Sources," further elucidates the significance of wind power as a sustainable alternative, sparking our curiosity about the factors influencing its generation.

Transitioning from the domain of non-fiction literature to works of fiction, stories such as Michael Crichton's "State of Fear" and Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl" offer captivating narratives of environmental crises, hinting at the interconnectedness of climate conditions and energy production. These imaginative tales propel us into considering the improbable link between Orlando air quality and Kosovo wind resources, expanding the scope of our inquiry with a touch of literary flair.

Now, speaking of unlikely pairings, have you heard about the meme featuring the distracted boyfriend ogling at a wind turbine while air pollution walks by? The internet's penchant for juxtaposing unrelated elements humorously mirrors our own mission of uncovering unexpected correlations between distant environmental phenomena.

Furthermore, as our investigation ventured deeper into the realm of statistical analysis, we couldn't help but wonder if our findings would leave our audience as breathless as a windy day in Kosovo. But, speaking of wind, why did the golfer bring two pairs of pants? In case they got a hole in one! We hope our research doesn't leave any gaping holes in the logic, much like the unexpected humor in a dad joke.

So, as we navigate this uncharted territory of environmental connections, be prepared for a whirlwind of discoveries and unexpected turns that may just blow your preconceptions away!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2010 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution and wind power generation! These two seem like a real breeze to study, don't they? Well, our research ventured into uncharted territory to explore the unlikely association between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this topic with a gust of determination, seeking to unearth any correlations between the two factors.

Our findings revealed a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592. This robust statistical relationship left us breathless! It seems that even across continents, the winds of change carry more than just fresh air - they also bear the potential for renewable energy.

So, why did the wind turbine break up with its partner? It just had too many trust issues - it couldn't handle the air pollution blowing hot and cold! But on a serious note, our research highlights the importance of considering intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. This surprising relationship serves as a strong gust of evidence for the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental systems, blowing down barriers between seemingly disparate regions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the demand for renewable energy continues to blow up, researchers are constantly seeking innovative ways to harness the power of nature, and perhaps even crack a few wind-related jokes along the way. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. It's a tale of two cities, united by statistical analysis and the zephyrs of data, that left us wondering - could this be a case of love at first wind?
Why did the statistician go to the eye doctor? Because they couldn’t see the forest plot for the trees! Statistical analysis may not always be the wind beneath our wings, but it was the tool we used to uncover the surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research aims to blow away any doubts about the significance of intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies.
We begin our journey by examining the environmental characteristics in Orlando, a city known for its warm climate and theme park thrills, but also for its contributions to air pollution levels. Meanwhile, in Kosovo, wind power generation has been gaining momentum, like a swirling vortex of renewable energy potential. Who would've thought that a research paper could sound like a thrilling adventure tale, right?
Our data analysis transcended borders, just like a gust of wind carrying the potential for change. The statistical correlation we uncovered between Orlando air stagnation and Kosovo wind generation is nothing short of a marvel. It’s as if the winds of fate brought these two variables together, leaving us in awe of the intricate dance of environmental influences across the globe.
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Well, in our case, data made up the foundation of our research, allowing us to unravel the interplay between air pollution and wind power generation. As we present our findings, we invite readers to join us in this whirlwind of discovery, where statistical analysis meets environmental impact in a partnership as unpredictable as the wind itself.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the relationship between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, we employed a methodological approach that could stand up to the whirlwind of statistical scrutiny. Our data collection process was as meticulous as calculating the wind speed during a tempest, so hold onto your hats as we reveal the gusty details.

First, we gathered historical data on air pollution levels in Orlando from the Environmental Protection Agency. We meticulously combed through the virtual airwaves, akin to dusting off old scientific manuscripts in search of hidden treasures - or in this case, pollutant concentrations. Our quest took us through the years 2010 to 2018, a period ripe with enough data to make any statistics enthusiast feel like a kid in a statistics candy store.

As for the wind power generation data in Kosovo, we turned to the Energy Information Administration, where we sifted through numbers like a gust of wind dispersing a pile of autumn leaves. The years 2010 to 2018 became our playground of research, where we chased after the wind power statistics with the same fervor as a kite enthusiast on a blustery day.

For the statistical analysis, we harnessed the power of correlation coefficients, performing a dance of hypothesis testing and regression analysis that was as graceful as a waltz in a windstorm - with more formulas and fewer formal wear. This process allowed us to quantitatively measure the strength of the relationship between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, and boy, did we find a correlation coefficient that blew us away!

After applying rigorous statistical measures, we were able to pinpoint a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9973592 between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. It seems that these two variables are as tightly intertwined as a knot in a windswept sail. This striking correlation left us feeling more elated than a wind turbine on a breezy day.

In conclusion, our methodology combined meticulous data gathering, statistical analysis, and a dash of scientific whimsy to unravel the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. The data didn't lie - it spun a tale of environmental interconnectedness that transcended borders, blowing away any skepticism about the significance of considering international environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. For our fellow researchers, let this be a gentle reminder - sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can blow us away with their statistical significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2010 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9973592, r-squared of 0.9947254, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution and wind power generation! These two seem like a real breeze to study, don't they? Well, our research ventured into uncharted territory to explore the unlikely association between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this topic with a gust of determination, seeking to unearth any correlations between the two factors.

Our findings revealed a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592. This robust statistical relationship left us breathless! It seems that even across continents, the winds of change carry more than just fresh air - they also bear the potential for renewable energy.

So, why did the wind turbine break up with its partner? It just had too many trust issues - it couldn't handle the air pollution blowing hot and cold! But on a serious note, our research highlights the importance of considering intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. This surprising relationship serves as a strong gust of evidence for the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental systems, blowing down barriers between seemingly disparate regions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the demand for renewable energy continues to blow up, researchers are constantly seeking innovative ways to harness the power of nature, and perhaps even crack a few wind-related jokes along the way. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. It's a tale of two cities, united by statistical analysis and the zephyrs of data, that left us wondering - could this be a case of love at first wind?
Why did the statistician go to the eye doctor? Because they couldn’t see the forest plot for the trees! Statistical analysis may not always be the wind beneath our wings, but it was the tool we used to uncover the surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research aims to blow away any doubts about the significance of intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies.
We begin our journey by examining the environmental characteristics in Orlando, a city known for its warm climate and theme park thrills, but also for its contributions to air pollution levels. Meanwhile, in Kosovo, wind power generation has been gaining momentum, like a swirling vortex of renewable energy potential. Who would've thought that a research paper could sound like a thrilling adventure tale, right?
Our data analysis transcended borders, just like a gust of wind carrying the potential for change. The statistical correlation we uncovered between Orlando air stagnation and Kosovo wind generation is nothing short of a marvel. It’s as if the winds of fate brought these two variables together, leaving us in awe of the intricate dance of environmental influences across the globe.
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Well, in our case, data made up the foundation of our research, allowing us to unravel the interplay between air pollution and wind power generation. As we present our findings, we invite readers to join us in this whirlwind of discovery, where statistical analysis meets environmental impact in a partnership as unpredictable as the wind itself.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our statistical analysis revealed an extraordinarily high correlation coefficient of 0.9973592 between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. This correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9947254 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicates an exceptionally strong association between the two variables, much like the bond between two solid scientific hypotheses – no air of doubt here!

Figure 1 illustrates the striking correlation between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. The scatterplot depicts a clear trend, akin to the windy roads of statistical inference leading us to this surprising discovery. It appears that the winds of change blow more than just renewable energy potential; they carry with them a tale of interconnected environmental influence, spanning continents and defying conventional research expectations.

Why did the statistician cross the road? To analyze the chicken’s data! In our case, the data led us on a unique journey, guiding us to the unexpected connection between air stagnation in Orlando and wind energy production in Kosovo. This correlation is a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, highlighting the intricate interplay between disparate geographical regions in shaping renewable energy dynamics.

Our findings underscore the significance of considering global environmental factors in renewable energy planning. Just as the wind travels across borders, so too do the effects of pollution and the potential of sustainable energy sources. It seems that when it comes to environmental impact, the winds of change spare no location, reminding us that the air we breathe and the energy we harness are part of the same atmospheric continuum.

In conclusion, our exploration of the link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo has blown away any lingering doubts about the interconnectedness of environmental influences on a global scale. The statistical evidence we've uncovered serves as a powerful gust of support for integrating transcontinental environmental considerations into renewable energy strategies. It's a remarkable reminder that the winds of change hold not only the promise of clean energy but also a deeper understanding of the complex relationships that shape our environmental future.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution and wind power generation! These two seem like a real breeze to study, don't they? Well, our research ventured into uncharted territory to explore the unlikely association between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this topic with a gust of determination, seeking to unearth any correlations between the two factors.

Our findings revealed a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592. This robust statistical relationship left us breathless! It seems that even across continents, the winds of change carry more than just fresh air - they also bear the potential for renewable energy.

So, why did the wind turbine break up with its partner? It just had too many trust issues - it couldn't handle the air pollution blowing hot and cold! But on a serious note, our research highlights the importance of considering intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. This surprising relationship serves as a strong gust of evidence for the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental systems, blowing down barriers between seemingly disparate regions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several formal inquiries into the relationship between air pollution levels and wind power generation have laid the groundwork for our exploration of the unusual pairing of Orlando air stagnation and Kosovo wind energy. Smith and Doe, in their seminal work "Environmental Impacts of Air Pollution," underscore the detrimental effects of airborne pollutants on atmospheric conditions, setting the stage for our investigation into the potential ramifications on wind patterns. Jones, in "Renewable Energy Sources," further elucidates the significance of wind power as a sustainable alternative, sparking our curiosity about the factors influencing its generation.
Transitioning from the domain of non-fiction literature to works of fiction, stories such as Michael Crichton's "State of Fear" and Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl" offer captivating narratives of environmental crises, hinting at the interconnectedness of climate conditions and energy production. These imaginative tales propel us into considering the improbable link between Orlando air quality and Kosovo wind resources, expanding the scope of our inquiry with a touch of literary flair.
Now, speaking of unlikely pairings, have you heard about the meme featuring the distracted boyfriend ogling at a wind turbine while air pollution walks by? The internet's penchant for juxtaposing unrelated elements humorously mirrors our own mission of uncovering unexpected correlations between distant environmental phenomena.
Furthermore, as our investigation ventured deeper into the realm of statistical analysis, we couldn't help but wonder if our findings would leave our audience as breathless as a windy day in Kosovo. But, speaking of wind, why did the golfer bring two pairs of pants? In case they got a hole in one! We hope our research doesn't leave any gaping holes in the logic, much like the unexpected humor in a dad joke.
So, as we navigate this uncharted territory of environmental connections, be prepared for a whirlwind of discoveries and unexpected turns that may just blow your preconceptions away!

[[RESULTS]]
Our statistical analysis revealed an extraordinarily high correlation coefficient of 0.9973592 between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. This correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9947254 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicates an exceptionally strong association between the two variables, much like the bond between two solid scientific hypotheses – no air of doubt here!
Figure 1 illustrates the striking correlation between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. The scatterplot depicts a clear trend, akin to the windy roads of statistical inference leading us to this surprising discovery. It appears that the winds of change blow more than just renewable energy potential; they carry with them a tale of interconnected environmental influence, spanning continents and defying conventional research expectations.
Why did the statistician cross the road? To analyze the chicken’s data! In our case, the data led us on a unique journey, guiding us to the unexpected connection between air stagnation in Orlando and wind energy production in Kosovo. This correlation is a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, highlighting the intricate interplay between disparate geographical regions in shaping renewable energy dynamics.
Our findings underscore the significance of considering global environmental factors in renewable energy planning. Just as the wind travels across borders, so too do the effects of pollution and the potential of sustainable energy sources. It seems that when it comes to environmental impact, the winds of change spare no location, reminding us that the air we breathe and the energy we harness are part of the same atmospheric continuum.
In conclusion, our exploration of the link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo has blown away any lingering doubts about the interconnectedness of environmental influences on a global scale. The statistical evidence we've uncovered serves as a powerful gust of support for integrating transcontinental environmental considerations into renewable energy strategies. It's a remarkable reminder that the winds of change hold not only the promise of clean energy but also a deeper understanding of the complex relationships that shape our environmental future.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study delved into the seemingly disparate realms of air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, and the results have certainly blown us away! As our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation between these two factors, it seems that the winds of statistical significance were truly in our favor. The remarkable correlation coefficient and strong association between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo have left us feeling as light-headed as a balloon caught in a breeze. This unexpected connection prompts us to rethink the scope of environmental influences on renewable energy dynamics.

The winds of change have certainly brought their fair share of surprises, much like a dad joke sneaking up on you when you least expect it. But jokes aside, these findings align with prior research that emphasized the interconnectedness of environmental variables, much like the interconnectedness of dad jokes with groans and eye rolls. The statistical evidence we've uncovered provides a gust of support for the idea that factors affecting air quality in one location can have resounding effects on renewable energy production in another, much like a domino effect orchestrated by a mischievous breeze.

Our journey into uncharted territory has led to an unexpected yet profound discovery – the air we breathe and the wind that powers turbines are linked in a way that transcends geographical boundaries and statistical expectations. This unexpected correlation certainly blows away any skepticism about the interconnectedness of environmental influences on a global scale, much like a strong gust of wind sweeping away uncertainty.

So, why did the wind power generator bring a fan to the research conference? Just to show off its air power! Our findings, while surprising, add an important dimension to renewable energy planning by underlining the need to consider not only local but also intercontinental environmental factors. It's a reminder that when it comes to environmental impact, the winds of change spare no location, echoing the sentiment that the pursuit of clean, renewable energy is truly a global effort.

As we reflect on the implications of our study, it's clear that exploring seemingly unrelated variables, much like the humorous pairing of a powerful breeze with a serious statistical inquiry, can lead to profound insights. Our research has opened up a new realm of possibilities, illustrating that the effects of air pollution and the potential of sustainable energy sources traverse boundaries, connecting us all like a good old dad joke – universally groan-worthy yet somehow unifying.

In the end, our investigation has blown down barriers between seemingly distant regions, much like a persistent gust of wind challenging preconceptions. We hope that our findings will serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, inspiring further exploration of the unexpected correlations that underpin our planet's complex systems.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Wind power generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution and wind power generation! These two seem like a real breeze to study, don't they? Well, our research ventured into uncharted territory to explore the unlikely association between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this topic with a gust of determination, seeking to unearth any correlations between the two factors.

Our findings revealed a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592. This robust statistical relationship left us breathless! It seems that even across continents, the winds of change carry more than just fresh air - they also bear the potential for renewable energy.

So, why did the wind turbine break up with its partner? It just had too many trust issues - it couldn't handle the air pollution blowing hot and cold! But on a serious note, our research highlights the importance of considering intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. This surprising relationship serves as a strong gust of evidence for the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental systems, blowing down barriers between seemingly disparate regions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the demand for renewable energy continues to blow up, researchers are constantly seeking innovative ways to harness the power of nature, and perhaps even crack a few wind-related jokes along the way. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. It's a tale of two cities, united by statistical analysis and the zephyrs of data, that left us wondering - could this be a case of love at first wind?
Why did the statistician go to the eye doctor? Because they couldn’t see the forest plot for the trees! Statistical analysis may not always be the wind beneath our wings, but it was the tool we used to uncover the surprising connection between two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research aims to blow away any doubts about the significance of intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies.
We begin our journey by examining the environmental characteristics in Orlando, a city known for its warm climate and theme park thrills, but also for its contributions to air pollution levels. Meanwhile, in Kosovo, wind power generation has been gaining momentum, like a swirling vortex of renewable energy potential. Who would've thought that a research paper could sound like a thrilling adventure tale, right?
Our data analysis transcended borders, just like a gust of wind carrying the potential for change. The statistical correlation we uncovered between Orlando air stagnation and Kosovo wind generation is nothing short of a marvel. It’s as if the winds of fate brought these two variables together, leaving us in awe of the intricate dance of environmental influences across the globe.
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Well, in our case, data made up the foundation of our research, allowing us to unravel the interplay between air pollution and wind power generation. As we present our findings, we invite readers to join us in this whirlwind of discovery, where statistical analysis meets environmental impact in a partnership as unpredictable as the wind itself.

[[RESULTS]]
Our statistical analysis revealed an extraordinarily high correlation coefficient of 0.9973592 between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. This correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9947254 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicates an exceptionally strong association between the two variables, much like the bond between two solid scientific hypotheses – no air of doubt here!
Figure 1 illustrates the striking correlation between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. The scatterplot depicts a clear trend, akin to the windy roads of statistical inference leading us to this surprising discovery. It appears that the winds of change blow more than just renewable energy potential; they carry with them a tale of interconnected environmental influence, spanning continents and defying conventional research expectations.
Why did the statistician cross the road? To analyze the chicken’s data! In our case, the data led us on a unique journey, guiding us to the unexpected connection between air stagnation in Orlando and wind energy production in Kosovo. This correlation is a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, highlighting the intricate interplay between disparate geographical regions in shaping renewable energy dynamics.
Our findings underscore the significance of considering global environmental factors in renewable energy planning. Just as the wind travels across borders, so too do the effects of pollution and the potential of sustainable energy sources. It seems that when it comes to environmental impact, the winds of change spare no location, reminding us that the air we breathe and the energy we harness are part of the same atmospheric continuum.
In conclusion, our exploration of the link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo has blown away any lingering doubts about the interconnectedness of environmental influences on a global scale. The statistical evidence we've uncovered serves as a powerful gust of support for integrating transcontinental environmental considerations into renewable energy strategies. It's a remarkable reminder that the winds of change hold not only the promise of clean energy but also a deeper understanding of the complex relationships that shape our environmental future.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our investigation into the connection between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo has certainly breezed through some surprising findings. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592, it seems the winds of statistical analysis have blown our expectations away. Speaking of wind power, did you hear about the statistician who tried to harness wind energy? Let’s just say it was a turbulent experience – he couldn’t handle the gusts of variability!

The robust statistical relationship we've uncovered highlights the importance of considering global air quality in shaping sustainable energy strategies. It's as if the wind turbines in Kosovo are spinning their blades in harmony with the air pollution levels in Orlando, creating a symphony of renewable energy potential. This unexpected bond serves as a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, reminding us that the forces shaping our world aren't confined by borders.

At this point, it's clear that no more research is needed in this area - we've blown through the usual expectations and uncovered a breeze of insights. It seems that the winds of change have carried us to a place of understanding – and maybe a few wind-related puns along the way. It’s time to let the statistical zephyrs settle and embrace the interconnectedness of our environmental systems.

And if anyone asks, "What do statisticians have to do with wind power?" Well, now we can confidently say, "They can certainly help you breeze through complex relationships and discover connections in the most unexpected places."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Atmospheric Quirks and Eclectic Climate Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Whimsical Institute for Atmospheric Quirkiness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Relationship between Orlando Air Stagnation and Kosovo Wind Generation: A Statistical Investigation with an abstract of The connection between air pollution and wind power generation! These two seem like a real breeze to study, don't they? Well, our research ventured into uncharted territory to explore the unlikely association between air pollution levels in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this topic with a gust of determination, seeking to unearth any correlations between the two factors.
Our findings revealed a remarkably strong link between air pollution in Orlando and wind power generation in Kosovo, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9973592. This robust statistical relationship left us breathless! It seems that even across continents, the winds of change carry more than just fresh air - they also bear the potential for renewable energy.
So, why did the wind turbine break up with its partner? It just had too many trust issues - it couldn't handle the air pollution blowing hot and cold! But on a serious note, our research highlights the importance of considering intercontinental environmental factors in shaping renewable energy strategies. This surprising relationship serves as a strong gust of evidence for the interconnectedness of our planet's environmental systems, blowing down barriers between seemingly disparate regions.

ChatGPT:

Orlando air pollution, Kosovo wind power generation, air stagnation, wind turbine, renewable energy, environmental correlation, air pollution impact, statistical investigation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Orlando
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Orlando

Wind power generated in Kosovo
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Kosovo in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Kosovo

Correlation r = 0.9973592 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9947254 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Kosovo) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Orlando) over the 9 years from 2010 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.11E-9. 0.0000000031080823741811923000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 3.11E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 321,741,794 random variables You don't actually need 321 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.99, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201020112012201320142015201620172018
Air pollution in Orlando (Bad air quality days)000000000.273973
Wind power generated in Kosovo (Billion kWh)0.0010.0030.0030.0030.0030.0030.0030.0030.03




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([0.001,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.03,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Orlando"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Kosovo"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 1704 · Black Variable ID: 21009 · Red Variable ID: 23775
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0