about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,692 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the second variable is Pirate attacks globally.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As corn in North Dakota returned to its natural, non-GMO state, it began emitting a faint, undetectable signal that repelled pirates. This signal, known as "maize-ic waves," created a disruption in the pirate communication network, leading to a decrease in pirate attacks globally. The pirates, unable to navigate properly in the presence of the maize-ic waves, inadvertently steered their ships away from potential targets, opting for corn-free waters instead. It seems that in this case, the corn was indeed mightier than the sword! This unforeseen consequence has left corn farmers in North Dakota both amused and a-maize-d.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a North Dakota cornfield with tall green stalks swaying in the breeze under a clear blue sky. Among the rows of corn, a towering pirate ship appears to be sailing, with a skull and crossbones flag flying high. A few pirates scramble on deck, while the captain looks out with a spyglass, creating an unexpected sight in the agricultural landscape. The style should resemble a cover image from a Discovery magazine, with vibrant colors and a clear focus on the surreal scene within the cornfield. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Macabre Low poly Charcoal A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a North Dakota cornfield, tall green stalks sway in the breeze under a clear blue sky. Among the rows of corn, a towering pirate ship appears to be sailing, with a skull and crossbones flag flying high. A few pirates scramble on deck, while the captain looks out with a spyglass, creating an unexpected sight in the agricultural landscape.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a North Dakota cornfield, tall green stalks sway in the breeze under a clear blue sky. Among the rows of corn, a towering pirate ship appears to be sailing, with a skull and crossbones flag flying high. A few pirates scramble on deck, while the captain looks out with a spyglass, creating an unexpected sight in the agricultural landscape. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a North Dakota cornfield with tall green stalks swaying in the breeze under a clear blue sky. Among the rows of corn, a towering pirate ship appears to be sailing, with a skull and crossbones flag flying high. A few pirates scramble on deck, while the captain looks out with a spyglass, creating an unexpected sight in the agricultural landscape. The style should resemble a cover image from a Discovery magazine, with vibrant colors and a clear focus on the surreal scene within the cornfield.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota caused Pirate attacks globally to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks

The Journal of Agronomic Anecdotes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy there, mateys! In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the occurrences of pirate attacks on the high seas. While it may sound like a stretch, we promise there's method to our madness. Using data from the USDA and Statista, we delved into the cornfields and high seas to uncover a surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022, suggesting a strong link between GMO corn production and global pirate shenanigans. So, come aboard and join us on this zany academic adventure as we unravel the mystery of corny GMOs and the swashbuckling world of pirate attacks. It's a tale so outlandish, you'd think it was fiction, but our data speaks for itself. Prepare to be amazed, amused, and possibly slightly bemused by the unexpected connection we've uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy there, mateys! In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the occurrences of pirate attacks on the high seas. While it may sound like a stretch, we promise there's method to our madness. Using data from the USDA and Statista, we delved into the cornfields and high seas to uncover a surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022, suggesting a strong link between GMO corn production and global pirate shenanigans. So, come aboard and join us on this zany academic adventure as we unravel the mystery of corny GMOs and the swashbuckling world of pirate attacks. It's a tale so outlandish, you'd think it was fiction, but our data speaks for itself. Prepare to be amazed, amused, and possibly slightly bemused by the unexpected connection we've uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ahoy, fellow researchers and salty sea dogs alike! Welcome to the most thrilling scientific investigation of all time, as we embark on an epic quest to uncover the bizarre connection between GMOs in corn grown in the undulating fields of North Dakota and the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas. It may seem like a peculiar pairing, but as the saying goes, "avast ye, for there be surprising correlations ahead!" Hold on to your tricorn hats and tighten those lab coat epaulets, because we're about to delve into the choppy waters of statistical analysis, GMO debates, and pirate lore in this swashbuckling tale of unanticipated connections.

If you're wondering how we stumbled upon this mind-boggling relationship, fear not! We share the same skepticism and inquisitiveness, which led us to this most unlikely of scientific inquiries. Our curiosity was piqued by the whispers of statistical anomalies and cryptic murmurs of GMO-infused corn fields clashing with the nefarious exploits of pirates. And thus, we set sail on a research voyage filled with exhilarating data analysis, corny puns, and the occasional "Aye, aye!" of statistical significance.

As we navigated the murky waters of academic literature and agricultural reports, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our chosen investigation. With each step, we found ourselves wading deeper into the labyrinth of GMO controversies and the tumultuous annals of pirate history. Who would have thought that the humble kernels of genetically modified corn could be entangled in the enigmatic web of global pirate attacks? It's a perplexing puzzle, to be sure, but we're determined to decipher its riddles and emerge victorious, armed with data and a sardonic sense of humor.

So, buckle your safety belts, tie down those bunsen burners, and prepare for a whimsical journey through the esoteric realms of agricultural biotechnology and high-seas vigilantism. We guarantee that by the end of this expedition, you'll be both entertained and astounded by the uncanny correlation we've unearthed. And who knows, you might just find yourself contemplating life's unlikely connections while munching on popcorn and gazing at the distant horizon, pondering the whimsical wonders of science and statistical thrills. Onward, dear readers, for the most peculiar of adventures awaits!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy there, mateys! In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the occurrences of pirate attacks on the high seas. While it may sound like a stretch, we promise there's method to our madness. Using data from the USDA and Statista, we delved into the cornfields and high seas to uncover a surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022, suggesting a strong link between GMO corn production and global pirate shenanigans. So, come aboard and join us on this zany academic adventure as we unravel the mystery of corny GMOs and the swashbuckling world of pirate attacks. It's a tale so outlandish, you'd think it was fiction, but our data speaks for itself. Prepare to be amazed, amused, and possibly slightly bemused by the unexpected connection we've uncovered.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and salty sea dogs alike! Welcome to the most thrilling scientific investigation of all time, as we embark on an epic quest to uncover the bizarre connection between GMOs in corn grown in the undulating fields of North Dakota and the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas. It may seem like a peculiar pairing, but as the saying goes, "avast ye, for there be surprising correlations ahead!" Hold on to your tricorn hats and tighten those lab coat epaulets, because we're about to delve into the choppy waters of statistical analysis, GMO debates, and pirate lore in this swashbuckling tale of unanticipated connections.
If you're wondering how we stumbled upon this mind-boggling relationship, fear not! We share the same skepticism and inquisitiveness, which led us to this most unlikely of scientific inquiries. Our curiosity was piqued by the whispers of statistical anomalies and cryptic murmurs of GMO-infused corn fields clashing with the nefarious exploits of pirates. And thus, we set sail on a research voyage filled with exhilarating data analysis, corny puns, and the occasional "Aye, aye!" of statistical significance.
As we navigated the murky waters of academic literature and agricultural reports, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our chosen investigation. With each step, we found ourselves wading deeper into the labyrinth of GMO controversies and the tumultuous annals of pirate history. Who would have thought that the humble kernels of genetically modified corn could be entangled in the enigmatic web of global pirate attacks? It's a perplexing puzzle, to be sure, but we're determined to decipher its riddles and emerge victorious, armed with data and a sardonic sense of humor.
So, buckle your safety belts, tie down those bunsen burners, and prepare for a whimsical journey through the esoteric realms of agricultural biotechnology and high-seas vigilantism. We guarantee that by the end of this expedition, you'll be both entertained and astounded by the uncanny correlation we've unearthed. And who knows, you might just find yourself contemplating life's unlikely connections while munching on popcorn and gazing at the distant horizon, pondering the whimsical wonders of science and statistical thrills. Onward, dear readers, for the most peculiar of adventures awaits!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the realm of agricultural biotechnology, the tumultuous debates and scholarly investigations surrounding the impact of GMOs on crop production have been the subject of extensive research. Smith et al. (2015) examined the effects of genetically modified maize on yield and pest resistance, shedding light on the intricate interplay between genetic modifications and agricultural output. Similarly, Doe's (2018) comprehensive analysis of GMO soybean cultivation underscored the complexities of biotechnological advancements in crop farming. The scholarly discourse concerning GMOs has traversed the fields of science and policy, capturing the attention of researchers and policymakers alike.

Turning our attention to maritime exploits, Jones' (2017) captivating exploration of historical pirate invasions brings to the fore the swashbuckling escapades of seafaring rogues. Infused with tales of daring raids and buried treasure, Jones' work presents a vivid tapestry of nautical adventures and illicit plundering. Moreover, the economic repercussions of piracy have not escaped the scrutiny of scholars, with studies such as "Pirates of the Caribbean" documenting the fiscal toll of maritime thievery.

As we venture into the realm of fiction, the works of acclaimed authors such as "The Sea of Corn" by Hemingcorn and "Pirates of the GMO-cific" by Corn-stanze further blur the boundaries between reality and imagination. These literary creations intertwine the enigmatic allure of GMO-infused landscapes with the high-seas drama of pirate lore, transcending conventional narratives with their whimsical juxtapositions.

Intriguingly, our literary exploration transcended the conventional confines of scholarly inquiry, leading us to unexpected sources of insight. As we delved deeper into our investigation, we stumbled upon unconventional repositories of knowledge, including the back labels of shampoo bottles and the cryptic messages hidden within fortune cookies. While unconventional, these sources offered a peculiar yet surprisingly enlightening perspective on the interplay of GMO corn and global piracy.

In synthesizing this myriad of scholarly and unconventional sources, we find ourselves poised at the confluence of agricultural innovation and maritime adventure, preparing to unravel the perplexing link between GMO corn production in North Dakota and the marauding exploits of pirates across the globe. As we unfurl the sails of data analysis and embark on this extraordinary voyage of discovery, it becomes evident that the threads of correlation are about to weave a tale so unexpected, you might just find yourself exclaiming, "Shiver me corn-ters!" on the next page of this enthralling academic odyssey.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy there, mateys! In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the occurrences of pirate attacks on the high seas. While it may sound like a stretch, we promise there's method to our madness. Using data from the USDA and Statista, we delved into the cornfields and high seas to uncover a surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022, suggesting a strong link between GMO corn production and global pirate shenanigans. So, come aboard and join us on this zany academic adventure as we unravel the mystery of corny GMOs and the swashbuckling world of pirate attacks. It's a tale so outlandish, you'd think it was fiction, but our data speaks for itself. Prepare to be amazed, amused, and possibly slightly bemused by the unexpected connection we've uncovered.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and salty sea dogs alike! Welcome to the most thrilling scientific investigation of all time, as we embark on an epic quest to uncover the bizarre connection between GMOs in corn grown in the undulating fields of North Dakota and the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas. It may seem like a peculiar pairing, but as the saying goes, "avast ye, for there be surprising correlations ahead!" Hold on to your tricorn hats and tighten those lab coat epaulets, because we're about to delve into the choppy waters of statistical analysis, GMO debates, and pirate lore in this swashbuckling tale of unanticipated connections.
If you're wondering how we stumbled upon this mind-boggling relationship, fear not! We share the same skepticism and inquisitiveness, which led us to this most unlikely of scientific inquiries. Our curiosity was piqued by the whispers of statistical anomalies and cryptic murmurs of GMO-infused corn fields clashing with the nefarious exploits of pirates. And thus, we set sail on a research voyage filled with exhilarating data analysis, corny puns, and the occasional "Aye, aye!" of statistical significance.
As we navigated the murky waters of academic literature and agricultural reports, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our chosen investigation. With each step, we found ourselves wading deeper into the labyrinth of GMO controversies and the tumultuous annals of pirate history. Who would have thought that the humble kernels of genetically modified corn could be entangled in the enigmatic web of global pirate attacks? It's a perplexing puzzle, to be sure, but we're determined to decipher its riddles and emerge victorious, armed with data and a sardonic sense of humor.
So, buckle your safety belts, tie down those bunsen burners, and prepare for a whimsical journey through the esoteric realms of agricultural biotechnology and high-seas vigilantism. We guarantee that by the end of this expedition, you'll be both entertained and astounded by the uncanny correlation we've unearthed. And who knows, you might just find yourself contemplating life's unlikely connections while munching on popcorn and gazing at the distant horizon, pondering the whimsical wonders of science and statistical thrills. Onward, dear readers, for the most peculiar of adventures awaits!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Ahoy, landlubbers and savvy researchers alike! The methodology we employed to unravel the enigmatic link between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in North Dakota corn and global pirate attacks was as treacherous as navigating through a stormy sea of statistical analyses and agricultural data. Our approach wasn't just a walk in the plank, it was a bold leap into the abyss of unexpected scientific inquiries. So, best batten down the hatches and prepare to set sail with us as we reveal the whimsical methods behind our groundbreaking investigation.

To begin our quest, we embarked on a daring voyage through the digital realms of the USDA and Statista, scouring the vast expanse of information from the years 2009 to 2022 with the tenacity of a ruthless pirate hunting for treasure. We unearthed copious amounts of data on GMO corn production in North Dakota and meticulously recorded the occurrences of pirate attacks across the globe, not with a spyglass and compass, but with the precision of modern statistical tools.

Our dashing crew of researchers utilized a mixed-methods approach that would make even the most seasoned explorers blush with admiration. First, we harnessed the power of quantitative analysis to measure the annual production of GMO corn in the rolling hills of North Dakota and compared it to the frequency of pirate attacks reported worldwide. The correlation coefficient we uncovered was so striking, it could rival the sparkle of a newly unearthed treasure chest.

But that's not all! To ensure the robustness of our findings, we also engaged in qualitative analysis, diving deep into the historical narratives of infamous pirate exploits and the heated debates swirling around the use of GMOs in agriculture. Our mission wasn't just to sail on the surface; we aimed to plunge into the depths of scholarly discussions and anecdotal accounts to paint a complete picture of this improbable correlation.

Moreover, our exploration led us to craft a multifaceted model that accounted for a myriad of potential confounding variables, such as global economic trends, geopolitical instabilities, and chattering parrots. We embraced the complexity of the data with open arms, untangling the intricate web of interconnected variables like a skilled sailor mastering the ropes of a galleon.

In the end, our methodology was nothing short of extraordinary. It was a rollicking adventure through the wild seas of research, filled with unexpected twists, resounding statistical analyses, and the occasional belly laugh at the absurdity of our chosen inquiry. We emerged from this thrilling expedition with a treasure trove of data and a newfound appreciation for the whimsical wonders of scientific investigation.

Prepare for the grand unveiling of our findings, where the unexpected correlation between GMO corn and global pirate escapades will dazzle you like a treasure map leading to untold riches. For now, we bid you adieu, as we prepare to navigate the choppy waters of data interpretation and chart the course for the most thrilling conclusion to this uproarious scientific saga. Fair winds and following seas await us!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9392197, r-squared of 0.8821336, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy there, mateys! In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the occurrences of pirate attacks on the high seas. While it may sound like a stretch, we promise there's method to our madness. Using data from the USDA and Statista, we delved into the cornfields and high seas to uncover a surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022, suggesting a strong link between GMO corn production and global pirate shenanigans. So, come aboard and join us on this zany academic adventure as we unravel the mystery of corny GMOs and the swashbuckling world of pirate attacks. It's a tale so outlandish, you'd think it was fiction, but our data speaks for itself. Prepare to be amazed, amused, and possibly slightly bemused by the unexpected connection we've uncovered.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and salty sea dogs alike! Welcome to the most thrilling scientific investigation of all time, as we embark on an epic quest to uncover the bizarre connection between GMOs in corn grown in the undulating fields of North Dakota and the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas. It may seem like a peculiar pairing, but as the saying goes, "avast ye, for there be surprising correlations ahead!" Hold on to your tricorn hats and tighten those lab coat epaulets, because we're about to delve into the choppy waters of statistical analysis, GMO debates, and pirate lore in this swashbuckling tale of unanticipated connections.
If you're wondering how we stumbled upon this mind-boggling relationship, fear not! We share the same skepticism and inquisitiveness, which led us to this most unlikely of scientific inquiries. Our curiosity was piqued by the whispers of statistical anomalies and cryptic murmurs of GMO-infused corn fields clashing with the nefarious exploits of pirates. And thus, we set sail on a research voyage filled with exhilarating data analysis, corny puns, and the occasional "Aye, aye!" of statistical significance.
As we navigated the murky waters of academic literature and agricultural reports, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our chosen investigation. With each step, we found ourselves wading deeper into the labyrinth of GMO controversies and the tumultuous annals of pirate history. Who would have thought that the humble kernels of genetically modified corn could be entangled in the enigmatic web of global pirate attacks? It's a perplexing puzzle, to be sure, but we're determined to decipher its riddles and emerge victorious, armed with data and a sardonic sense of humor.
So, buckle your safety belts, tie down those bunsen burners, and prepare for a whimsical journey through the esoteric realms of agricultural biotechnology and high-seas vigilantism. We guarantee that by the end of this expedition, you'll be both entertained and astounded by the uncanny correlation we've unearthed. And who knows, you might just find yourself contemplating life's unlikely connections while munching on popcorn and gazing at the distant horizon, pondering the whimsical wonders of science and statistical thrills. Onward, dear readers, for the most peculiar of adventures awaits!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The moment of truth has arrived, and it's time to reveal the eye-popping results of our unconventional quest for the elusive link between GMO-laden cornfields and the swashbuckling escapades of pirate crews across the globe. Prepare to have your scientific socks thoroughly knocked off, because what we discovered is nothing short of astonishing.

Our statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9392197, indicating a strikingly strong relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in North Dakota and the frequency of pirate attacks on the high seas. That's right, folks, we're talking about a connection so robust that it makes even the staunchest skeptics do a double-take.

Not only that, but our r-squared value of 0.8821336 further solidifies the validity of this seemingly far-fetched association. It's as if the GMO-laden corn was whispering tales of plunder and adventure across the ocean waves, leading to a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned mathematicians do a merry jig.

And if the correlation coefficient and r-squared value weren't enough to convince you of the legitimacy of our findings, hold on to your tricorn hats, because the p-value for this relationship clocks in at less than 0.01. That's right, the probability of this connection being due to random chance is as slim as a pirate's chances of finding a chest of gold without a treasure map.

To put it simply, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) succinctly encapsulates the undeniable relationship between GMO corn production and global pirate antics, leaving little room for doubt and a whole lot of room for animated conversations at future scientific soirees.

It's safe to say that our journey through the tumultuous seas of data analysis and statistical inference has led us to an unexpected treasure trove of scientific revelation. The pirate booty of knowledge we've unearthed may be unconventional, but it's undeniably intriguing. So, batten down the hatches, because the seas of scientific discovery are bound to get even more tempestuous as we sail forth towards the implications and potential explanations for this outlandish correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy there, mateys! In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the occurrences of pirate attacks on the high seas. While it may sound like a stretch, we promise there's method to our madness. Using data from the USDA and Statista, we delved into the cornfields and high seas to uncover a surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022, suggesting a strong link between GMO corn production and global pirate shenanigans. So, come aboard and join us on this zany academic adventure as we unravel the mystery of corny GMOs and the swashbuckling world of pirate attacks. It's a tale so outlandish, you'd think it was fiction, but our data speaks for itself. Prepare to be amazed, amused, and possibly slightly bemused by the unexpected connection we've uncovered.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the realm of agricultural biotechnology, the tumultuous debates and scholarly investigations surrounding the impact of GMOs on crop production have been the subject of extensive research. Smith et al. (2015) examined the effects of genetically modified maize on yield and pest resistance, shedding light on the intricate interplay between genetic modifications and agricultural output. Similarly, Doe's (2018) comprehensive analysis of GMO soybean cultivation underscored the complexities of biotechnological advancements in crop farming. The scholarly discourse concerning GMOs has traversed the fields of science and policy, capturing the attention of researchers and policymakers alike.
Turning our attention to maritime exploits, Jones' (2017) captivating exploration of historical pirate invasions brings to the fore the swashbuckling escapades of seafaring rogues. Infused with tales of daring raids and buried treasure, Jones' work presents a vivid tapestry of nautical adventures and illicit plundering. Moreover, the economic repercussions of piracy have not escaped the scrutiny of scholars, with studies such as "Pirates of the Caribbean" documenting the fiscal toll of maritime thievery.
As we venture into the realm of fiction, the works of acclaimed authors such as "The Sea of Corn" by Hemingcorn and "Pirates of the GMO-cific" by Corn-stanze further blur the boundaries between reality and imagination. These literary creations intertwine the enigmatic allure of GMO-infused landscapes with the high-seas drama of pirate lore, transcending conventional narratives with their whimsical juxtapositions.
Intriguingly, our literary exploration transcended the conventional confines of scholarly inquiry, leading us to unexpected sources of insight. As we delved deeper into our investigation, we stumbled upon unconventional repositories of knowledge, including the back labels of shampoo bottles and the cryptic messages hidden within fortune cookies. While unconventional, these sources offered a peculiar yet surprisingly enlightening perspective on the interplay of GMO corn and global piracy.
In synthesizing this myriad of scholarly and unconventional sources, we find ourselves poised at the confluence of agricultural innovation and maritime adventure, preparing to unravel the perplexing link between GMO corn production in North Dakota and the marauding exploits of pirates across the globe. As we unfurl the sails of data analysis and embark on this extraordinary voyage of discovery, it becomes evident that the threads of correlation are about to weave a tale so unexpected, you might just find yourself exclaiming, "Shiver me corn-ters!" on the next page of this enthralling academic odyssey.

[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, and it's time to reveal the eye-popping results of our unconventional quest for the elusive link between GMO-laden cornfields and the swashbuckling escapades of pirate crews across the globe. Prepare to have your scientific socks thoroughly knocked off, because what we discovered is nothing short of astonishing.
Our statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9392197, indicating a strikingly strong relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in North Dakota and the frequency of pirate attacks on the high seas. That's right, folks, we're talking about a connection so robust that it makes even the staunchest skeptics do a double-take.
Not only that, but our r-squared value of 0.8821336 further solidifies the validity of this seemingly far-fetched association. It's as if the GMO-laden corn was whispering tales of plunder and adventure across the ocean waves, leading to a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned mathematicians do a merry jig.
And if the correlation coefficient and r-squared value weren't enough to convince you of the legitimacy of our findings, hold on to your tricorn hats, because the p-value for this relationship clocks in at less than 0.01. That's right, the probability of this connection being due to random chance is as slim as a pirate's chances of finding a chest of gold without a treasure map.
To put it simply, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) succinctly encapsulates the undeniable relationship between GMO corn production and global pirate antics, leaving little room for doubt and a whole lot of room for animated conversations at future scientific soirees.
It's safe to say that our journey through the tumultuous seas of data analysis and statistical inference has led us to an unexpected treasure trove of scientific revelation. The pirate booty of knowledge we've unearthed may be unconventional, but it's undeniably intriguing. So, batten down the hatches, because the seas of scientific discovery are bound to get even more tempestuous as we sail forth towards the implications and potential explanations for this outlandish correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Avast, me hearties! The swashbuckling saga of GMO-laden corn and global pirate escapades seems no longer confined to the annals of whimsical fiction or the realms of improbable legends. Our findings not only corroborate but also amplify the enigmatic narrative that has ensnared our scholarly inclinations and statistical sensibilities.

Much like the fearless voyages of the marauding privateers of old, our study set sail on uncharted waters; however, instead of navigating treacherous seas, we charted the perplexing currents of statistical analysis and data interpretation. As our ship weathered the storm of skepticism and raised the mast of scientific rigor, the winds of correlation blew in our favor, revealing a connection of staggering magnitude.

Our results upheld the work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2018), who delved into the arcane realm of genetically modified maize and soybean cultivation, respectively. Just as these intrepid researchers illuminated the intricate dance between biotechnological marvels and agricultural yields, our study stands as a testament to the enduring influence of GMOs in the realms of both corn and piracy. If they were dashing pirates, our results were the buried treasure they sought - undeniable, sought-after, and seemingly stashed away in the least likely of places.

In our literary review, we were undeniably captivated by Jones' (2017) enthralling narratives of historical pirate invasions and the economic reverberations of maritime thievery. Little did we fathom that our research would transport us from the rolling fields of North Dakota to the tumultuous tides of global piracy, buoyed by the unlikely threads of correlation that had lain dormant, awaiting their discovery.

Moreover, our journey through unconventional sources and whimsical locales, albeit seemingly fanciful, proved to be more akin to a secretive treasure map leading to the chest of statistical truths. Much like the cryptic messages hidden within fortune cookies, our findings beckon with an alluring charm, inviting skeptics to partake in the revelry of improbable yet compelling correlations.

In conclusion, our zany academic odyssey has yielded a rare bounty of scientific revelat-ion, affirming the uncanny connection between the cultivation of GMO-laden corn and the roguish exploits of pirates across the high seas. The interwoven tapestry of GMOs and piracy may continue to perplex and amuse, but as we navigate these uncharted waters, it's clear that our findings have set a course for scholarly discussions that promise to be as lively and entertaining as the most raucous pirate tavern. So, hoist the anchor of inquiry and chart the course of intellectual adventure – the sea of discovery beckons!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Pirate attacks globally. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy there, mateys! In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the occurrences of pirate attacks on the high seas. While it may sound like a stretch, we promise there's method to our madness. Using data from the USDA and Statista, we delved into the cornfields and high seas to uncover a surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022, suggesting a strong link between GMO corn production and global pirate shenanigans. So, come aboard and join us on this zany academic adventure as we unravel the mystery of corny GMOs and the swashbuckling world of pirate attacks. It's a tale so outlandish, you'd think it was fiction, but our data speaks for itself. Prepare to be amazed, amused, and possibly slightly bemused by the unexpected connection we've uncovered.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ahoy, fellow researchers and salty sea dogs alike! Welcome to the most thrilling scientific investigation of all time, as we embark on an epic quest to uncover the bizarre connection between GMOs in corn grown in the undulating fields of North Dakota and the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas. It may seem like a peculiar pairing, but as the saying goes, "avast ye, for there be surprising correlations ahead!" Hold on to your tricorn hats and tighten those lab coat epaulets, because we're about to delve into the choppy waters of statistical analysis, GMO debates, and pirate lore in this swashbuckling tale of unanticipated connections.
If you're wondering how we stumbled upon this mind-boggling relationship, fear not! We share the same skepticism and inquisitiveness, which led us to this most unlikely of scientific inquiries. Our curiosity was piqued by the whispers of statistical anomalies and cryptic murmurs of GMO-infused corn fields clashing with the nefarious exploits of pirates. And thus, we set sail on a research voyage filled with exhilarating data analysis, corny puns, and the occasional "Aye, aye!" of statistical significance.
As we navigated the murky waters of academic literature and agricultural reports, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our chosen investigation. With each step, we found ourselves wading deeper into the labyrinth of GMO controversies and the tumultuous annals of pirate history. Who would have thought that the humble kernels of genetically modified corn could be entangled in the enigmatic web of global pirate attacks? It's a perplexing puzzle, to be sure, but we're determined to decipher its riddles and emerge victorious, armed with data and a sardonic sense of humor.
So, buckle your safety belts, tie down those bunsen burners, and prepare for a whimsical journey through the esoteric realms of agricultural biotechnology and high-seas vigilantism. We guarantee that by the end of this expedition, you'll be both entertained and astounded by the uncanny correlation we've unearthed. And who knows, you might just find yourself contemplating life's unlikely connections while munching on popcorn and gazing at the distant horizon, pondering the whimsical wonders of science and statistical thrills. Onward, dear readers, for the most peculiar of adventures awaits!

[[RESULTS]]
The moment of truth has arrived, and it's time to reveal the eye-popping results of our unconventional quest for the elusive link between GMO-laden cornfields and the swashbuckling escapades of pirate crews across the globe. Prepare to have your scientific socks thoroughly knocked off, because what we discovered is nothing short of astonishing.
Our statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9392197, indicating a strikingly strong relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in North Dakota and the frequency of pirate attacks on the high seas. That's right, folks, we're talking about a connection so robust that it makes even the staunchest skeptics do a double-take.
Not only that, but our r-squared value of 0.8821336 further solidifies the validity of this seemingly far-fetched association. It's as if the GMO-laden corn was whispering tales of plunder and adventure across the ocean waves, leading to a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned mathematicians do a merry jig.
And if the correlation coefficient and r-squared value weren't enough to convince you of the legitimacy of our findings, hold on to your tricorn hats, because the p-value for this relationship clocks in at less than 0.01. That's right, the probability of this connection being due to random chance is as slim as a pirate's chances of finding a chest of gold without a treasure map.
To put it simply, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) succinctly encapsulates the undeniable relationship between GMO corn production and global pirate antics, leaving little room for doubt and a whole lot of room for animated conversations at future scientific soirees.
It's safe to say that our journey through the tumultuous seas of data analysis and statistical inference has led us to an unexpected treasure trove of scientific revelation. The pirate booty of knowledge we've unearthed may be unconventional, but it's undeniably intriguing. So, batten down the hatches, because the seas of scientific discovery are bound to get even more tempestuous as we sail forth towards the implications and potential explanations for this outlandish correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the unlikely but undeniably strong connection between the use of GMOs in corn grown in North Dakota and the frequency of pirate attacks on the high seas. As we navigate through the data-laden waters, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient so robust that it could make even the most stoic researcher raise an eyebrow in bemusement. It's almost as if the GMO-laden cornfields were whispering tales of swashbuckling adventure across the oceans, creating a statistical dance that would make even the most cynical statistics professor crack a smile.

Our findings, while undoubtedly surprising, contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the realms of agricultural biotechnology, global trade, and historical maritime misadventures. The implications of this seemingly outlandish correlation are vast, inspiring contemplation on the whimsical wonders of statistical analysis and the unexpected connections found in the vast sea of research.

However, we must acknowledge that our study has its limitations, just like a ship can't sail on dry land. As much as we've reveled in the revelatory nature of our findings, we must exercise caution in extrapolating too far beyond the confines of our data. While our results may be a treasure trove of statistical intrigue, further research would be akin to chasing after a mirage in the desert – unnecessary and only leading to exhaustion.

Therefore, with a tip of our scholarly hats and a nod to the whimsical nature of scientific discovery, we assert with confidence that no further research is needed in this area. Our results stand as a testament to the unexpected and the enchanting in the world of academic inquiry. Let this be a reminder that in the vast ocean of knowledge, sometimes the most bizarre connections can lead to the most intriguing insights. Safe voyages and statistical shenanigans to all.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agronomic Anecdotes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Anomalies and Nautical Nonsense


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shiver Me Corn-ters: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Global Pirate Attacks with an abstract of Ahoy there, mateys! In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the occurrences of pirate attacks on the high seas. While it may sound like a stretch, we promise there's method to our madness. Using data from the USDA and Statista, we delved into the cornfields and high seas to uncover a surprising correlation. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9392197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2022, suggesting a strong link between GMO corn production and global pirate shenanigans. So, come aboard and join us on this zany academic adventure as we unravel the mystery of corny GMOs and the swashbuckling world of pirate attacks. It's a tale so outlandish, you'd think it was fiction, but our data speaks for itself. Prepare to be amazed, amused, and possibly slightly bemused by the unexpected connection we've uncovered.

ChatGPT:

GMOs, corn, North Dakota, pirate attacks, correlation, USDA, Statista, GMO corn production, correlation coefficient, p-value, 2009-2022, global pirate attacks

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in North Dakota that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota

Pirate attacks globally
Detailed data title: Global Pirate Attack Count
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Pirate attacks globally

Correlation r = 0.9392197 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8821336 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Pirate attacks globally) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.4E-7. 0.0000006380019191522042000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 6.4E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,567,393 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota (GMO corn %)222226175664523333
Pirate attacks globally (Number of Attacks)410445439297264245246191180201162195132115




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([22,22,26,17,5,6,6,4,5,2,3,3,3,3,])
array_2 = np.array([410,445,439,297,264,245,246,191,180,201,162,195,132,115,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Pirate attacks globally"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1692 · Black Variable ID: 718 · Red Variable ID: 488
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0