about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,690 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and the second variable is The number of upholsterers in Mississippi.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The lack of oversized, insect-repelling cotton plants led to a shortage of fabric, ultimately deflating the job market for upholsterers. Without GMO cotton, there were no longer "sew" many opportunities in the upholstery industry, leaving many to "unravel" their careers.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Show a picturesque cotton field in Mississippi, featuring a group of skilled artisans gracefully weaving and stitching genetically modified cotton fibers into beautiful upholstery fabric. The vibrant green cotton plants provide a serene backdrop for the artisans' intricate craftsmanship, seamlessly blending traditional textile techniques with modern agricultural innovation. The scene should exude a sense of harmony between nature and human creativity, capturing the essence of sustainable craftsmanship within a visually captivating composition. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Glitch art Realistic Hyper-realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cotton field in Mississippi, a group of upholsterers are working with the genetically modified cotton fibers to create beautiful, durable upholstery fabric. The bright green cotton plants provide a backdrop for the skilled artisans as they weave and stitch the fabric, blending traditional craftsmanship with innovative agricultural technology.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a cotton field in Mississippi, a group of upholsterers are working with the genetically modified cotton fibers to create beautiful, durable upholstery fabric. The bright green cotton plants provide a backdrop for the skilled artisans as they weave and stitch the fabric, blending traditional craftsmanship with innovative agricultural technology. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Show a picturesque cotton field in Mississippi, featuring a group of skilled artisans gracefully weaving and stitching genetically modified cotton fibers into beautiful upholstery fabric. The vibrant green cotton plants provide a serene backdrop for the artisans' intricate craftsmanship, seamlessly blending traditional textile techniques with modern agricultural innovation. The scene should exude a sense of harmony between nature and human creativity, capturing the essence of sustainable craftsmanship within a visually captivating composition.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Mississippi caused The number of upholsterers in Mississippi to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi

The Journal of Fabric Engineering and Textile Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Drawing from data provided by the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the years 2003 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We reveal how the introduction and widespread adoption of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of Mississippi's economy and labor force, exerting a discernible impact on the demand for upholsterers. The findings, though humorous at first glance, shed light on the multifaceted repercussions of modern agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated sectors. Our study urges researchers to unravel the threads of causality, spooling further investigations into the far-reaching consequences of GMO adoption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Drawing from data provided by the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the years 2003 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We reveal how the introduction and widespread adoption of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of Mississippi's economy and labor force, exerting a discernible impact on the demand for upholsterers. The findings, though humorous at first glance, shed light on the multifaceted repercussions of modern agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated sectors. Our study urges researchers to unravel the threads of causality, spooling further investigations into the far-reaching consequences of GMO adoption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The fabric of agricultural innovation has been woven with threads of controversy and curiosity, particularly surrounding the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As cotton growers in Mississippi embraced the use of GMO cotton seeds, a curious phenomenon began to unravel - a surge in the demand for upholsterers across the state. This unexpected connection prompted us to embark on a mission to untangle the intricacies of this relationship, armed with statistical tools and a penchant for poking fun at unexpected correlations.

The juxtaposition of GMO cotton and upholsterers may sound like the setup for a punchline, but our research has revealed a statistically significant and surprisingly strong correlation between these variables. It's a tale of how the seeds of genetic modification have sown unexpected repercussions in a seemingly unrelated industry. As we delve into the data spanning nearly two decades, our findings not only raise eyebrows but also beckon us to examine the unseen stitches that bind together different sectors of the economy.

Naturally, our quest began with a thorough examination of the data provided by the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Armed with spreadsheets and a sense of scientific adventure, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the mysteries of agricultural practices and labor dynamics. In the spirit of scientific discovery, we set out to debunk the myth that correlation does not imply causation, while also sprinkling in some stats-themed puns along the way.

The overarching goal of our study is not only to uncover the statistical relationship between cotton cultivation and upholstery occupation but also to prod at the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. By doing so, we aim to turn the spotlight on the broader implications of GMO adoption and its ripple effects across diverse sectors. Our findings may appear whimsical at first glance, but they carry profound implications for understanding the tapestry of interconnected industries in the modern economy.

In the following sections, we will guide you through our expedition, from the initial puzzle of a seemingly absurd correlation to the unveiling of its statistical significance. Get ready for a journey filled with unexpected twists, statistical acrobatics, and perhaps a few puns that might make you groan - but rest assured, we're unraveling serious insights through this lighthearted exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Drawing from data provided by the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the years 2003 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We reveal how the introduction and widespread adoption of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of Mississippi's economy and labor force, exerting a discernible impact on the demand for upholsterers. The findings, though humorous at first glance, shed light on the multifaceted repercussions of modern agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated sectors. Our study urges researchers to unravel the threads of causality, spooling further investigations into the far-reaching consequences of GMO adoption.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The fabric of agricultural innovation has been woven with threads of controversy and curiosity, particularly surrounding the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As cotton growers in Mississippi embraced the use of GMO cotton seeds, a curious phenomenon began to unravel - a surge in the demand for upholsterers across the state. This unexpected connection prompted us to embark on a mission to untangle the intricacies of this relationship, armed with statistical tools and a penchant for poking fun at unexpected correlations.
The juxtaposition of GMO cotton and upholsterers may sound like the setup for a punchline, but our research has revealed a statistically significant and surprisingly strong correlation between these variables. It's a tale of how the seeds of genetic modification have sown unexpected repercussions in a seemingly unrelated industry. As we delve into the data spanning nearly two decades, our findings not only raise eyebrows but also beckon us to examine the unseen stitches that bind together different sectors of the economy.
Naturally, our quest began with a thorough examination of the data provided by the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Armed with spreadsheets and a sense of scientific adventure, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the mysteries of agricultural practices and labor dynamics. In the spirit of scientific discovery, we set out to debunk the myth that correlation does not imply causation, while also sprinkling in some stats-themed puns along the way.
The overarching goal of our study is not only to uncover the statistical relationship between cotton cultivation and upholstery occupation but also to prod at the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. By doing so, we aim to turn the spotlight on the broader implications of GMO adoption and its ripple effects across diverse sectors. Our findings may appear whimsical at first glance, but they carry profound implications for understanding the tapestry of interconnected industries in the modern economy.
In the following sections, we will guide you through our expedition, from the initial puzzle of a seemingly absurd correlation to the unveiling of its statistical significance. Get ready for a journey filled with unexpected twists, statistical acrobatics, and perhaps a few puns that might make you groan - but rest assured, we're unraveling serious insights through this lighthearted exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2010) excavate the tangled relationships between agricultural practices and labor dynamics, shedding light on the unexpected consequences hidden within. Their exploration of the effects of genetically modified organism (GMO) adoption in cotton cultivation presents a sobering analysis, punctuated with the occasional statistical quip. Similarly, Jones and Smith (2014) delve into the economic ramifications of GMO technologies in agriculture, weaving a narrative of changing labor demands and industry interconnections that would make even the most steadfast statistician pause for contemplation.

Moving past the scholarly chronicles, let us now turn our attention to publications that venture beyond the realm of non-fiction. "The Cotton Chronicles: A Stitch in Time" (Doe, 2018) provides a fictional yet compelling account of the trials and triumphs of cotton growers, entwining the narrative with subtle allusions to the broader societal impacts of agricultural innovation. Meanwhile, "The Upholsterer's Dilemma" (Smith, 2016) paints a vibrant fictional tapestry of the upholstery industry, engaging readers with the quirky anecdotes and unlikely encounters that shape the upholsterer's world.

Venturing into the world of cinema, a few tangentially related films captivate the imagination. "The Cotton Conspiracy" explores the covert intrigues of agricultural technologies, weaving together a thrilling narrative set amidst the sprawling cotton fields of the American South. Meanwhile, "The Upholsterer's Odyssey" takes viewers on a whimsical journey through the trials and tribulations faced by a passionate upholsterer, showcasing how unexpected connections can stitch together the most unlikely scenarios.

As we navigate through this tapestry of literature and media, it becomes increasingly clear that the intersection of GMO cotton and the upholstery industry is not just a statistical anomaly - it is a rich tapestry of humor, absurdity, and unexpected correlations that merit deeper investigation. Underneath the seemingly whimsical surface lies a web of causality and consequence waiting to be unraveled, and our study aims to deftly untangle these threads of intertwined fate and statistical happenstance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Drawing from data provided by the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the years 2003 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We reveal how the introduction and widespread adoption of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of Mississippi's economy and labor force, exerting a discernible impact on the demand for upholsterers. The findings, though humorous at first glance, shed light on the multifaceted repercussions of modern agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated sectors. Our study urges researchers to unravel the threads of causality, spooling further investigations into the far-reaching consequences of GMO adoption.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The fabric of agricultural innovation has been woven with threads of controversy and curiosity, particularly surrounding the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As cotton growers in Mississippi embraced the use of GMO cotton seeds, a curious phenomenon began to unravel - a surge in the demand for upholsterers across the state. This unexpected connection prompted us to embark on a mission to untangle the intricacies of this relationship, armed with statistical tools and a penchant for poking fun at unexpected correlations.
The juxtaposition of GMO cotton and upholsterers may sound like the setup for a punchline, but our research has revealed a statistically significant and surprisingly strong correlation between these variables. It's a tale of how the seeds of genetic modification have sown unexpected repercussions in a seemingly unrelated industry. As we delve into the data spanning nearly two decades, our findings not only raise eyebrows but also beckon us to examine the unseen stitches that bind together different sectors of the economy.
Naturally, our quest began with a thorough examination of the data provided by the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Armed with spreadsheets and a sense of scientific adventure, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the mysteries of agricultural practices and labor dynamics. In the spirit of scientific discovery, we set out to debunk the myth that correlation does not imply causation, while also sprinkling in some stats-themed puns along the way.
The overarching goal of our study is not only to uncover the statistical relationship between cotton cultivation and upholstery occupation but also to prod at the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. By doing so, we aim to turn the spotlight on the broader implications of GMO adoption and its ripple effects across diverse sectors. Our findings may appear whimsical at first glance, but they carry profound implications for understanding the tapestry of interconnected industries in the modern economy.
In the following sections, we will guide you through our expedition, from the initial puzzle of a seemingly absurd correlation to the unveiling of its statistical significance. Get ready for a journey filled with unexpected twists, statistical acrobatics, and perhaps a few puns that might make you groan - but rest assured, we're unraveling serious insights through this lighthearted exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To quell our curiosity and lay the groundwork for unraveling the cottony tapestry of GMO adoption and upholsterer employment in Mississippi, we embarked on a zesty methodological journey. Our approach was akin to untangling a skein of yarn - methodically, yet with a touch of whimsy.

First, we combed through a multitude of sources, with the internet serving as our vast and bounteous field of data. We plucked information from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics like ripe cotton bolls, ensuring that our dataset was as robust as a sturdy upholstery fabric. While some may say we "picked" and "spun" data, we assure you that our methods were as thorough as inspecting each thread for durability.

With a treasure trove of data spanning the years 2003 to 2022 in our possession, we employed statistical tools that would make even the most discerning upholsterer envious. We utilized time-series analysis to weave together patterns across the years, treating each data point as a unique fiber in the grand fabric of our research.

Now, here's where things get delightfully nerdy. We employed the Pearson correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between GMO cotton use in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Much like the precision required to stitch together a complex quilt, our statistical analysis sought to ascertain the degree of interweaving between these seemingly disparate variables.

To complement our correlation analysis, we drew upon the mighty power of regression modeling. We crafted models with the finesse of a master weaver, examining how changes in GMO cotton cultivation relate to fluctuations in upholsterer employment. Through these models, we sought to knit together a narrative of causality, teasing out the underlying threads that bind the two variables.

In the spirit of scientific rigor and a sprinkling of amusement, we diligently checked for autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity, ensuring that our findings were as steadfast as a well-crafted upholstery seam. We also conducted robustness checks to affirm the resilience of our conclusions, akin to stress-testing a fabric to ensure its endurance in the face of unexpected strains.

Finally, to invigorate our analysis with a hint of playfulness, we opted for a vibrant array of statistical visualizations. Our graphs shimmered with hues of correlation matrices, scatter plots, and trend lines, offering a tapestry of insights that would captivate the most discerning of statistics connoisseurs.

Armed with this methodological arsenal, we embarked on our quest to illuminate the unexpected relationship between GMO cotton and upholsterers, infusing our research with a spirit of scientific inquiry and a touch of whimsy that, much like a well-crafted pun, we hope will leave a lasting impression.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9182747, r-squared of 0.8432284, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Drawing from data provided by the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the years 2003 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We reveal how the introduction and widespread adoption of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of Mississippi's economy and labor force, exerting a discernible impact on the demand for upholsterers. The findings, though humorous at first glance, shed light on the multifaceted repercussions of modern agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated sectors. Our study urges researchers to unravel the threads of causality, spooling further investigations into the far-reaching consequences of GMO adoption.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The fabric of agricultural innovation has been woven with threads of controversy and curiosity, particularly surrounding the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As cotton growers in Mississippi embraced the use of GMO cotton seeds, a curious phenomenon began to unravel - a surge in the demand for upholsterers across the state. This unexpected connection prompted us to embark on a mission to untangle the intricacies of this relationship, armed with statistical tools and a penchant for poking fun at unexpected correlations.
The juxtaposition of GMO cotton and upholsterers may sound like the setup for a punchline, but our research has revealed a statistically significant and surprisingly strong correlation between these variables. It's a tale of how the seeds of genetic modification have sown unexpected repercussions in a seemingly unrelated industry. As we delve into the data spanning nearly two decades, our findings not only raise eyebrows but also beckon us to examine the unseen stitches that bind together different sectors of the economy.
Naturally, our quest began with a thorough examination of the data provided by the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Armed with spreadsheets and a sense of scientific adventure, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the mysteries of agricultural practices and labor dynamics. In the spirit of scientific discovery, we set out to debunk the myth that correlation does not imply causation, while also sprinkling in some stats-themed puns along the way.
The overarching goal of our study is not only to uncover the statistical relationship between cotton cultivation and upholstery occupation but also to prod at the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. By doing so, we aim to turn the spotlight on the broader implications of GMO adoption and its ripple effects across diverse sectors. Our findings may appear whimsical at first glance, but they carry profound implications for understanding the tapestry of interconnected industries in the modern economy.
In the following sections, we will guide you through our expedition, from the initial puzzle of a seemingly absurd correlation to the unveiling of its statistical significance. Get ready for a journey filled with unexpected twists, statistical acrobatics, and perhaps a few puns that might make you groan - but rest assured, we're unraveling serious insights through this lighthearted exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state has unraveled a novel and unexpected correlation worthy of a round of applause. From 2003 to 2022, we discovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9182747, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8432284 and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical findings not only raise eyebrows but also stitch together a compelling narrative of how GMO adoption has threaded itself into the fabric of Mississippi's economy.

The centerpiece of our results is none other than the delightful scatterplot that we've affectionately dubbed "Fig. 1." This captivating visual representation portrays the strong correlation between the use of GMO cotton and the number of upholsterers in Mississippi. It's a sight to behold, akin to witnessing the playful dance of statistical significance twine its way through the data points.

Our findings may seem like the punchline of a whimsical research endeavor, but they underscore the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and labor dynamics. The seemingly disparate realms of cotton cultivation and upholstering have been woven together in a way that merits further investigatory unraveling.

In the grand tapestry of scientific discovery, our study serves as a colorful patch that contributes to the broader understanding of the ripple effects unleashed by GMO adoption. As scholars, we relish the opportunity to shed light on the unforeseen connections that emerge from the statistical loom, knowing full well that every data point has a thread of significance waiting to be unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Drawing from data provided by the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the years 2003 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We reveal how the introduction and widespread adoption of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of Mississippi's economy and labor force, exerting a discernible impact on the demand for upholsterers. The findings, though humorous at first glance, shed light on the multifaceted repercussions of modern agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated sectors. Our study urges researchers to unravel the threads of causality, spooling further investigations into the far-reaching consequences of GMO adoption.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2010) excavate the tangled relationships between agricultural practices and labor dynamics, shedding light on the unexpected consequences hidden within. Their exploration of the effects of genetically modified organism (GMO) adoption in cotton cultivation presents a sobering analysis, punctuated with the occasional statistical quip. Similarly, Jones and Smith (2014) delve into the economic ramifications of GMO technologies in agriculture, weaving a narrative of changing labor demands and industry interconnections that would make even the most steadfast statistician pause for contemplation.
Moving past the scholarly chronicles, let us now turn our attention to publications that venture beyond the realm of non-fiction. "The Cotton Chronicles: A Stitch in Time" (Doe, 2018) provides a fictional yet compelling account of the trials and triumphs of cotton growers, entwining the narrative with subtle allusions to the broader societal impacts of agricultural innovation. Meanwhile, "The Upholsterer's Dilemma" (Smith, 2016) paints a vibrant fictional tapestry of the upholstery industry, engaging readers with the quirky anecdotes and unlikely encounters that shape the upholsterer's world.
Venturing into the world of cinema, a few tangentially related films captivate the imagination. "The Cotton Conspiracy" explores the covert intrigues of agricultural technologies, weaving together a thrilling narrative set amidst the sprawling cotton fields of the American South. Meanwhile, "The Upholsterer's Odyssey" takes viewers on a whimsical journey through the trials and tribulations faced by a passionate upholsterer, showcasing how unexpected connections can stitch together the most unlikely scenarios.
As we navigate through this tapestry of literature and media, it becomes increasingly clear that the intersection of GMO cotton and the upholstery industry is not just a statistical anomaly - it is a rich tapestry of humor, absurdity, and unexpected correlations that merit deeper investigation. Underneath the seemingly whimsical surface lies a web of causality and consequence waiting to be unraveled, and our study aims to deftly untangle these threads of intertwined fate and statistical happenstance.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state has unraveled a novel and unexpected correlation worthy of a round of applause. From 2003 to 2022, we discovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9182747, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8432284 and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical findings not only raise eyebrows but also stitch together a compelling narrative of how GMO adoption has threaded itself into the fabric of Mississippi's economy.
The centerpiece of our results is none other than the delightful scatterplot that we've affectionately dubbed "Fig. 1." This captivating visual representation portrays the strong correlation between the use of GMO cotton and the number of upholsterers in Mississippi. It's a sight to behold, akin to witnessing the playful dance of statistical significance twine its way through the data points.
Our findings may seem like the punchline of a whimsical research endeavor, but they underscore the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and labor dynamics. The seemingly disparate realms of cotton cultivation and upholstering have been woven together in a way that merits further investigatory unraveling.
In the grand tapestry of scientific discovery, our study serves as a colorful patch that contributes to the broader understanding of the ripple effects unleashed by GMO adoption. As scholars, we relish the opportunity to shed light on the unforeseen connections that emerge from the statistical loom, knowing full well that every data point has a thread of significance waiting to be unraveled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study, much like a darn good joke, leave a lasting impression. Our findings not only support the existing literature but also spin a yarn of unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. This connection, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 and a p-value less than 0.01, isn't just a statistical coincidence - it's a punchline waiting to be unraveled.

In line with the quip-laden literature, our findings take the serious matter of agricultural practices and labor dynamics and infuse it with a tasteful amount of humor. Smith and Doe's (2010) exploration of the effects of GMO adoption in cotton cultivation is no longer just a scholarly pursuit; it's now a comedy sketch with a high coefficient of laughter. Similarly, Jones and Smith's (2014) economic ramblings about GMO technologies in agriculture now have a stitch of unexpected humor, weaving a narrative of changing labor demands and industry interconnections that could make even the most steadfast statistician chuckle.

The inexplicable correlation between GMO cotton and upholsterers in Mississippi, much like a well-timed pun, adds an element of surprise to the academic narrative. The absurdity of this unexpected relationship, akin to a slapstick comedy, begs further investigation to unravel the intertwined fate of cotton cultivation and upholstering. Our study delights in highlighting the whimsical connections that emerge from the statistical loom, reminding us that every data point has a thread of significance waiting to be unraveled, much like a good punchline in a sea of earnest dialogue.

In the grand tapestry of scientific discovery, our study serves as a colorful patch that contributes to the broader understanding of the ripple effects unleashed by GMO adoption. As researchers, we relish the opportunity to shed light on the unforeseen connections that emerge from the statistical loom, knowing full well that every data point has a thread of significance waiting to be unraveled, much like a comedic mystery waiting to be solved.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Mississippi and The number of upholsterers in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Drawing from data provided by the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the years 2003 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We reveal how the introduction and widespread adoption of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of Mississippi's economy and labor force, exerting a discernible impact on the demand for upholsterers. The findings, though humorous at first glance, shed light on the multifaceted repercussions of modern agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated sectors. Our study urges researchers to unravel the threads of causality, spooling further investigations into the far-reaching consequences of GMO adoption.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The fabric of agricultural innovation has been woven with threads of controversy and curiosity, particularly surrounding the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As cotton growers in Mississippi embraced the use of GMO cotton seeds, a curious phenomenon began to unravel - a surge in the demand for upholsterers across the state. This unexpected connection prompted us to embark on a mission to untangle the intricacies of this relationship, armed with statistical tools and a penchant for poking fun at unexpected correlations.
The juxtaposition of GMO cotton and upholsterers may sound like the setup for a punchline, but our research has revealed a statistically significant and surprisingly strong correlation between these variables. It's a tale of how the seeds of genetic modification have sown unexpected repercussions in a seemingly unrelated industry. As we delve into the data spanning nearly two decades, our findings not only raise eyebrows but also beckon us to examine the unseen stitches that bind together different sectors of the economy.
Naturally, our quest began with a thorough examination of the data provided by the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Armed with spreadsheets and a sense of scientific adventure, we embarked on a statistical journey to unravel the mysteries of agricultural practices and labor dynamics. In the spirit of scientific discovery, we set out to debunk the myth that correlation does not imply causation, while also sprinkling in some stats-themed puns along the way.
The overarching goal of our study is not only to uncover the statistical relationship between cotton cultivation and upholstery occupation but also to prod at the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. By doing so, we aim to turn the spotlight on the broader implications of GMO adoption and its ripple effects across diverse sectors. Our findings may appear whimsical at first glance, but they carry profound implications for understanding the tapestry of interconnected industries in the modern economy.
In the following sections, we will guide you through our expedition, from the initial puzzle of a seemingly absurd correlation to the unveiling of its statistical significance. Get ready for a journey filled with unexpected twists, statistical acrobatics, and perhaps a few puns that might make you groan - but rest assured, we're unraveling serious insights through this lighthearted exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state has unraveled a novel and unexpected correlation worthy of a round of applause. From 2003 to 2022, we discovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9182747, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8432284 and a p-value less than 0.01. These statistical findings not only raise eyebrows but also stitch together a compelling narrative of how GMO adoption has threaded itself into the fabric of Mississippi's economy.
The centerpiece of our results is none other than the delightful scatterplot that we've affectionately dubbed "Fig. 1." This captivating visual representation portrays the strong correlation between the use of GMO cotton and the number of upholsterers in Mississippi. It's a sight to behold, akin to witnessing the playful dance of statistical significance twine its way through the data points.
Our findings may seem like the punchline of a whimsical research endeavor, but they underscore the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and labor dynamics. The seemingly disparate realms of cotton cultivation and upholstering have been woven together in a way that merits further investigatory unraveling.
In the grand tapestry of scientific discovery, our study serves as a colorful patch that contributes to the broader understanding of the ripple effects unleashed by GMO adoption. As scholars, we relish the opportunity to shed light on the unforeseen connections that emerge from the statistical loom, knowing full well that every data point has a thread of significance waiting to be unraveled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In unraveling the peculiar connection between GMO cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers, our statistical journey has taken us on a whimsical ride through the fabric of agricultural and labor dynamics. It seems the GMO threads have woven a tale of unexpected correlations, prompting us to ponder the stitching together of seemingly unrelated sectors. Our findings, akin to discovering a hidden pattern in an intricate tapestry, reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9182747, figuratively tying the knots between GMO cotton and upholsterers. This remarkable relationship, while initially seeming like the punchline of a statistical joke, highlights the entwined nature of economic sectors and the need for further exploration in this unique thread of research.

As we wrap up this study, we can confidently say that our findings have spun a compelling narrative, reminding us that statistical significance can often be woven from the most unlikely of correlations. The grand loom of statistical research can indeed produce unexpected patterns, much like finding a hidden stitch in a complex statistical quilt. Our results suggest that the adoption of GMO cotton has left its mark on Mississippi's economic fabric, influencing the demand for upholsterers in ways that may seem eccentric at first glance. However, as researchers, we relish the opportunity to unravel the threads that tie together such intriguing phenomena, even if it entails a few groan-worthy statistical puns along the way.

In conclusion, our study sets the stage for future explorations into the ripple effects of GMO adoption and its impact on diverse economic sectors. Weaving together the statistical significance of our findings, we contend that further investigation in this area may yield more unexpected connections that deserve to be teased out and examined. However, as for the relationship between GMO cotton and upholsterers in Mississippi, it seems our findings have brought this particular yarn to a satisfying conclusion - no more research is needed in this area!




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Fabric Engineering and Textile Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Genetic Fabrication and Textile Innovation (SGFTI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spinning a Yarn: The Genetically Modified Thread of GMO Cotton and the Weaving of Upholsterers in Mississippi with an abstract of This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Mississippi and the number of upholsterers in the state. Drawing from data provided by the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics covering the years 2003 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9182747 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. We reveal how the introduction and widespread adoption of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of Mississippi's economy and labor force, exerting a discernible impact on the demand for upholsterers. The findings, though humorous at first glance, shed light on the multifaceted repercussions of modern agricultural practices on seemingly unrelated sectors. Our study urges researchers to unravel the threads of causality, spooling further investigations into the far-reaching consequences of GMO adoption.

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, genetically modified organism cotton, Mississippi, upholsterers, fabric manufacturing, agriculture economy, labor force, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, GMO adoption consequences, causality analysis, GMO impact on economy, cotton production, Mississippi economy, GMO cotton adoption, textile industry, GMO effects on labor force

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Mississippi
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Mississippi that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Mississippi

The number of upholsterers in Mississippi
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of upholsterers in Mississippi
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of upholsterers in Mississippi

Correlation r = 0.9182747 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8432284 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of upholsterers in Mississippi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Mississippi) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-8. 0.0000000114486329780067690000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.1E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 87,346,673 random variables You don't actually need 87 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Mississippi (GMO cotton %)162323221913169771211112364338
The number of upholsterers in Mississippi (Upholsterers)50605550562047604800449040903740351035203940404037403520346036603200239033003500




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([16,23,23,22,19,13,16,9,7,7,12,11,11,2,3,6,4,3,3,8,])
array_2 = np.array([5060,5550,5620,4760,4800,4490,4090,3740,3510,3520,3940,4040,3740,3520,3460,3660,3200,2390,3300,3500,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Mississippi"
array_2_name = "The number of upholsterers in Mississippi"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1690 · Black Variable ID: 784 · Red Variable ID: 10345
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0