about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,680 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and the second variable is Google searches for 'Vihart'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As lacrosse teams scored more points, they also scored more viewers, leading to an uptick in Vihart searches. The correlation demonstrates that when it comes to Vihart, people are drawn to higher points of interest.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in a 3D Pixar style that displays the winning team of the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship celebrating their victory on the field. The players hoist their lacrosse sticks in the air amid confetti and cheers from the crowd. In the stands, fans are depicted checking their phones and tablets, with keen expressions on their faces, while some are visibly searching for "Vihart" on Google. The stadium is filled with an atmosphere of jubilation and curiosity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Cute cartoon Voxel art 3D Pixar Style Pop art
ChatGPT: 3D Pixar Style

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the final minutes of the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship, the winning team celebrates their victory with a 5-point lead. In the stands, fans eagerly check their phones and tablets, searching for "Vihart" on Google to learn more about the renowned mathematician and educator.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ 3D Pixar Style ] and depicting this scene: In the final minutes of the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship, the winning team celebrates their victory with a 5-point lead. In the stands, fans eagerly check their phones and tablets, searching for "Vihart" on Google to learn more about the renowned mathematician and educator. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in a 3D Pixar style that displays the winning team of the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship celebrating their victory on the field. The players hoist their lacrosse sticks in the air amid confetti and cheers from the crowd. In the stands, fans are depicted checking their phones and tablets, with keen expressions on their faces, while some are visibly searching for "Vihart" on Google. The stadium is filled with an atmosphere of jubilation and curiosity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential positively influenced Vihart (Google searches for 'Vihart'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'

The Journal of Playful Research Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from NCAA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lacrosse and love for Vihart may seem like an odd pair, but our research dives into this peculiar relationship. One might even say we're "sticking" with an unconventional choice of focus. Our study utilizes data from the NCAA and Google Trends to examine the potential connection between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' In this paper, we "stick" to the facts while incorporating a dash of whimsical humor, because, after all, what's life without a bit of a "lac-roast" now and then?

Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. This indicates a statistically significant, albeit quirky, relationship between the intensity of championship games and individuals' searches for Vihart. As we "pass the ball" of knowledge to future researchers, we invite them to embrace a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration in their inquiries.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lacrosse and love for Vihart may seem like an odd pair, but our research dives into this peculiar relationship. One might even say we're "sticking" with an unconventional choice of focus. Our study utilizes data from the NCAA and Google Trends to examine the potential connection between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' In this paper, we "stick" to the facts while incorporating a dash of whimsical humor, because, after all, what's life without a bit of a "lac-roast" now and then?

Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. This indicates a statistically significant, albeit quirky, relationship between the intensity of championship games and individuals' searches for Vihart. As we "pass the ball" of knowledge to future researchers, we invite them to embrace a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration in their inquiries.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:

[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, grab your lacrosse sticks and get ready to dive into an offbeat yet intriguing journey of statistical analysis. As we venture into the world of NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the enigmatic allure of 'Vihart', we are faced with the unexpected fusion of sports and internet search behavior. It's as if the nerdy kid suddenly showed up at the sports field, and surprisingly, they hit it off like peas in a pod! But hey, who are we to judge – even odd pairs can make for exciting dynamics, just like mixing Fritos and M&Ms.

The aim of this study is not just to uncover the statistical relationship between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart', but also to inject a little bit of whimsy and humor into what can sometimes be an overly serious academic landscape. After all, a good dad joke is like a lacrosse ball – it might catch you off guard, but it's all in good fun.

Just as a lacrosse player needs to keep their head up and be aware of all elements on the field, our research keeps an open mind and considers uncharted territories in the realm of statistical analysis. So, let’s lace up our research shoes and get ready to sprint across the field of academia, armed with an arsenal of statistics and a healthy dose of lightheartedness.

Now, some might ask, "What's the deal with finding a connection between lacrosse and Vihart searches?" To them, we say, "Why not?" Life is too short to always play by the rules, and every now and then, a little deviation leads to discovering something remarkable. Just like when a lacrosse player takes an unconventional route to score a goal – or when a nerdy math enthusiast catches the attention of sports aficionados.

So, as we embark on this adventure of statistical exploration, let's keep our sense of humor close at hand and our eyes open for the unexpected. After all, much like a well-executed dad joke, this research might just leave you with an unexpected smirk and a newfound appreciation for the unlikeliest of correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lacrosse and love for Vihart may seem like an odd pair, but our research dives into this peculiar relationship. One might even say we're "sticking" with an unconventional choice of focus. Our study utilizes data from the NCAA and Google Trends to examine the potential connection between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' In this paper, we "stick" to the facts while incorporating a dash of whimsical humor, because, after all, what's life without a bit of a "lac-roast" now and then?

Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. This indicates a statistically significant, albeit quirky, relationship between the intensity of championship games and individuals' searches for Vihart. As we "pass the ball" of knowledge to future researchers, we invite them to embrace a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration in their inquiries.


-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, grab your lacrosse sticks and get ready to dive into an offbeat yet intriguing journey of statistical analysis. As we venture into the world of NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the enigmatic allure of 'Vihart', we are faced with the unexpected fusion of sports and internet search behavior. It's as if the nerdy kid suddenly showed up at the sports field, and surprisingly, they hit it off like peas in a pod! But hey, who are we to judge – even odd pairs can make for exciting dynamics, just like mixing Fritos and M&Ms.
The aim of this study is not just to uncover the statistical relationship between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart', but also to inject a little bit of whimsy and humor into what can sometimes be an overly serious academic landscape. After all, a good dad joke is like a lacrosse ball – it might catch you off guard, but it's all in good fun.
Just as a lacrosse player needs to keep their head up and be aware of all elements on the field, our research keeps an open mind and considers uncharted territories in the realm of statistical analysis. So, let’s lace up our research shoes and get ready to sprint across the field of academia, armed with an arsenal of statistics and a healthy dose of lightheartedness.
Now, some might ask, "What's the deal with finding a connection between lacrosse and Vihart searches?" To them, we say, "Why not?" Life is too short to always play by the rules, and every now and then, a little deviation leads to discovering something remarkable. Just like when a lacrosse player takes an unconventional route to score a goal – or when a nerdy math enthusiast catches the attention of sports aficionados.
So, as we embark on this adventure of statistical exploration, let's keep our sense of humor close at hand and our eyes open for the unexpected. After all, much like a well-executed dad joke, this research might just leave you with an unexpected smirk and a newfound appreciation for the unlikeliest of correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that point differentials in sports championships have been traditionally studied as markers of team performance and game intensity. However, the connection between these point differentials and individuals' search behaviors on the internet remains relatively unexplored. This classic study sets the stage for our unconventional investigation into the correlation between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart'.

In "Doe and Johnson," the authors delve into the world of internet search trends and the factors that influence individuals' online queries. While their focus is primarily on commercial interests and information-seeking behaviors, their insights prompt us to consider the potential influence of sporting events on search patterns. It’s like being in a race and suddenly finding oneself caught in a "lacrosse" of internet searches – quite unexpected and slightly amusing!

Furthermore, "Jones and Smith" examine the role of extracurricular interests and hobbies in shaping individuals' online interactions. Their work underscores the significance of personal passions and their potential impact on search activity. It’s like a lacrosse player finding their groove and scoring a goal – a moment of triumph and satisfaction amidst the game, just like stumbling upon a hilarious 'Vihart' video!

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Power of Play: How Fun and Games Help Children Thrive" by Peter Gray explores the dynamics of play and its influence on individuals' cognitive processes. While the focus is on child development, the underlying principles of playful engagement resonate with our exploration of the unexpected relationship between lacrosse championship outcomes and 'Vihart' searches. It’s almost as if statistical analysis and playful curiosity have decided to "play catch" in the realm of academic research!

On a lighter note, "The Mathematical Corporation: Where Machine Intelligence and Human Ingenuity Achieve the Impossible" by Josh Sullivan and Angela Zutavern navigates the interplay between mathematical concepts and human creativity. While not directly related to our research focus, the playful juxtaposition of 'Vihart' searches and lacrosse finals point differentials invites a whimsical parallel to the fusion of machine intelligence and human ingenuity. It’s like adding a bit of lightheartedness to an otherwise serious statistical analysis – a delightful "lacrosse" of unexpected connections!

Now, stepping into the realm of fiction, the works of J.K. Rowling, particularly the "Quidditch Through the Ages," offer insights into the fusion of sports and magical realms. While Quidditch and lacrosse may belong to different dimensions, there’s a shared spirit of competition and unexpected twists that adds a touch of whimsy to our exploration. It’s as if a touch of magic has found its way into our statistical inquiry, creating an unexpected blend of seriousness and enchantment!

On the social media front, a tweet from @MathHumorLover reads, "Lacrosse championships and 'Vihart' searches – talk about a 'curve ball' in statistical analysis! Who knew sports and nerdy math puns could have a connection?" This playful tweet captures the essence of our research – an unexpected curve in the game of statistical analysis, where sports and internet searches meet in a delightful mashup! It's like hitting a "lac-rosy" sweet spot of unexpected correlations and lighthearted musings in the world of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from NCAA and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lacrosse and love for Vihart may seem like an odd pair, but our research dives into this peculiar relationship. One might even say we're "sticking" with an unconventional choice of focus. Our study utilizes data from the NCAA and Google Trends to examine the potential connection between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' In this paper, we "stick" to the facts while incorporating a dash of whimsical humor, because, after all, what's life without a bit of a "lac-roast" now and then?

Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. This indicates a statistically significant, albeit quirky, relationship between the intensity of championship games and individuals' searches for Vihart. As we "pass the ball" of knowledge to future researchers, we invite them to embrace a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration in their inquiries.


[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, grab your lacrosse sticks and get ready to dive into an offbeat yet intriguing journey of statistical analysis. As we venture into the world of NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the enigmatic allure of 'Vihart', we are faced with the unexpected fusion of sports and internet search behavior. It's as if the nerdy kid suddenly showed up at the sports field, and surprisingly, they hit it off like peas in a pod! But hey, who are we to judge – even odd pairs can make for exciting dynamics, just like mixing Fritos and M&Ms.
The aim of this study is not just to uncover the statistical relationship between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart', but also to inject a little bit of whimsy and humor into what can sometimes be an overly serious academic landscape. After all, a good dad joke is like a lacrosse ball – it might catch you off guard, but it's all in good fun.
Just as a lacrosse player needs to keep their head up and be aware of all elements on the field, our research keeps an open mind and considers uncharted territories in the realm of statistical analysis. So, let’s lace up our research shoes and get ready to sprint across the field of academia, armed with an arsenal of statistics and a healthy dose of lightheartedness.
Now, some might ask, "What's the deal with finding a connection between lacrosse and Vihart searches?" To them, we say, "Why not?" Life is too short to always play by the rules, and every now and then, a little deviation leads to discovering something remarkable. Just like when a lacrosse player takes an unconventional route to score a goal – or when a nerdy math enthusiast catches the attention of sports aficionados.
So, as we embark on this adventure of statistical exploration, let's keep our sense of humor close at hand and our eyes open for the unexpected. After all, much like a well-executed dad joke, this research might just leave you with an unexpected smirk and a newfound appreciation for the unlikeliest of correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the peculiar connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart', our research team embarked on a quest that involved both statistical rigor and a sprinkling of whimsy. Our data collection process can be likened to a lacrosse game where the players keep passing the ball, except in our case, the "ball" was data and the "players" were various online platforms. We leveraged data from the NCAA official records and Google Trends to ensure a comprehensive and well-rounded approach to our investigation. After all, just like a good game plan, a well-rounded dataset is essential for achieving our research goals.

Given the diverse nature of the data sources, we ensured that our methodology adhered to sound statistical principles while incorporating a touch of creative flair, not unlike a lacrosse player showcasing some fancy stickwork. Our approach involved a mix of quantitative analysis and qualitative interpretation, almost like blending the precision of a game strategy with the artistry of a skilled player's moves. We wanted to ensure that our research resonates with both the analytically-minded and the creatively-inclined, much like how a well-placed pun can bring a smile to everyone's face.

The data from the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials provided the measurements of game intensity, akin to the scores on a player's stat sheet. Meanwhile, the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' served as our indicator of internet users' intrigue, similar to how a lively crowd fuels the energy on the field. We sought to bridge the gap between sports and internet culture, creating a delightful blend of the athletic and the eccentric, not unlike mixing chocolate and peanut butter – unexpected but undeniably delicious.

To analyze the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, we employed advanced statistical techniques, akin to how a seasoned coach utilizes intricate formations and strategic plays to lead their team to victory. Our analysis encompassed regression modeling and time series analysis, with a dash of machine learning algorithms for good measure. We wanted to ensure that our study had the statistical muscle to support its findings, much like how a lacrosse player needs strength and agility to maneuver through a game.

Now, you might ask, "Why use such complex methods for a study that appears whimsical?" Our response, of course, would be, "Why not?" After all, just like a cleverly delivered dad joke, a touch of complexity can elevate the overall experience, leaving a lasting impression. In this sense, our methodology embraced the unorthodox pairing of statistical rigor and lightheartedness, capturing the essence of our exploration into the unexpected correlation between lacrosse finals and 'Vihart' searches, much like an unexpected goal that catches everyone off guard.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from NCAA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7241247, r-squared of 0.5243565, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lacrosse and love for Vihart may seem like an odd pair, but our research dives into this peculiar relationship. One might even say we're "sticking" with an unconventional choice of focus. Our study utilizes data from the NCAA and Google Trends to examine the potential connection between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' In this paper, we "stick" to the facts while incorporating a dash of whimsical humor, because, after all, what's life without a bit of a "lac-roast" now and then?

Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. This indicates a statistically significant, albeit quirky, relationship between the intensity of championship games and individuals' searches for Vihart. As we "pass the ball" of knowledge to future researchers, we invite them to embrace a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration in their inquiries.


-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, grab your lacrosse sticks and get ready to dive into an offbeat yet intriguing journey of statistical analysis. As we venture into the world of NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the enigmatic allure of 'Vihart', we are faced with the unexpected fusion of sports and internet search behavior. It's as if the nerdy kid suddenly showed up at the sports field, and surprisingly, they hit it off like peas in a pod! But hey, who are we to judge – even odd pairs can make for exciting dynamics, just like mixing Fritos and M&Ms.
The aim of this study is not just to uncover the statistical relationship between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart', but also to inject a little bit of whimsy and humor into what can sometimes be an overly serious academic landscape. After all, a good dad joke is like a lacrosse ball – it might catch you off guard, but it's all in good fun.
Just as a lacrosse player needs to keep their head up and be aware of all elements on the field, our research keeps an open mind and considers uncharted territories in the realm of statistical analysis. So, let’s lace up our research shoes and get ready to sprint across the field of academia, armed with an arsenal of statistics and a healthy dose of lightheartedness.
Now, some might ask, "What's the deal with finding a connection between lacrosse and Vihart searches?" To them, we say, "Why not?" Life is too short to always play by the rules, and every now and then, a little deviation leads to discovering something remarkable. Just like when a lacrosse player takes an unconventional route to score a goal – or when a nerdy math enthusiast catches the attention of sports aficionados.
So, as we embark on this adventure of statistical exploration, let's keep our sense of humor close at hand and our eyes open for the unexpected. After all, much like a well-executed dad joke, this research might just leave you with an unexpected smirk and a newfound appreciation for the unlikeliest of correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The bittersweet symphony of statistics has yielded some intriguing findings. We found a considerable correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 between the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' from 2007 to 2022. It seems that this unconventional pair indeed dances to the beat of their own drum, or perhaps, to the rhythm of a face-off on the lacrosse field. It's like they say, "When in doubt, stick to the stats!"

The r-squared value of 0.5243565 emphasizes that over 52% of the variability in Google searches for 'Vihart' can be explained by the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship. It's remarkable how even in the world of statistics, odd pairs can come together and create magic, much like the perfect pass leading to a stunning goal.

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further supports the notion that this statistical relationship is not a fluke. It seems that there is more to this peculiar connection than meets the eye, just like the unexpected chemistry between peanut butter and pickles – odd, but undeniably intriguing.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the strong correlation between the two variables. This visual representation further solidifies the noteworthy bond between lacrosse final scores and the enthusiasm for 'Vihart' searches. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this one surely speaks volumes about the unorthodox relationship we've uncovered.

In conclusion, our offbeat investigation into the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart' has unveiled a statistically significant correlation. It's a reminder that in the world of research, as in life, serendipitous discoveries can emerge from the most unexpected places. Just like a lacrosse ball can take unpredictable bounces, so too can the world of statistics leave us pleasantly surprised with its quirky relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lacrosse and love for Vihart may seem like an odd pair, but our research dives into this peculiar relationship. One might even say we're "sticking" with an unconventional choice of focus. Our study utilizes data from the NCAA and Google Trends to examine the potential connection between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' In this paper, we "stick" to the facts while incorporating a dash of whimsical humor, because, after all, what's life without a bit of a "lac-roast" now and then?

Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. This indicates a statistically significant, albeit quirky, relationship between the intensity of championship games and individuals' searches for Vihart. As we "pass the ball" of knowledge to future researchers, we invite them to embrace a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration in their inquiries.


[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that point differentials in sports championships have been traditionally studied as markers of team performance and game intensity. However, the connection between these point differentials and individuals' search behaviors on the internet remains relatively unexplored. This classic study sets the stage for our unconventional investigation into the correlation between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart'.
In "Doe and Johnson," the authors delve into the world of internet search trends and the factors that influence individuals' online queries. While their focus is primarily on commercial interests and information-seeking behaviors, their insights prompt us to consider the potential influence of sporting events on search patterns. It’s like being in a race and suddenly finding oneself caught in a "lacrosse" of internet searches – quite unexpected and slightly amusing!
Furthermore, "Jones and Smith" examine the role of extracurricular interests and hobbies in shaping individuals' online interactions. Their work underscores the significance of personal passions and their potential impact on search activity. It’s like a lacrosse player finding their groove and scoring a goal – a moment of triumph and satisfaction amidst the game, just like stumbling upon a hilarious 'Vihart' video!
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Power of Play: How Fun and Games Help Children Thrive" by Peter Gray explores the dynamics of play and its influence on individuals' cognitive processes. While the focus is on child development, the underlying principles of playful engagement resonate with our exploration of the unexpected relationship between lacrosse championship outcomes and 'Vihart' searches. It’s almost as if statistical analysis and playful curiosity have decided to "play catch" in the realm of academic research!
On a lighter note, "The Mathematical Corporation: Where Machine Intelligence and Human Ingenuity Achieve the Impossible" by Josh Sullivan and Angela Zutavern navigates the interplay between mathematical concepts and human creativity. While not directly related to our research focus, the playful juxtaposition of 'Vihart' searches and lacrosse finals point differentials invites a whimsical parallel to the fusion of machine intelligence and human ingenuity. It’s like adding a bit of lightheartedness to an otherwise serious statistical analysis – a delightful "lacrosse" of unexpected connections!
Now, stepping into the realm of fiction, the works of J.K. Rowling, particularly the "Quidditch Through the Ages," offer insights into the fusion of sports and magical realms. While Quidditch and lacrosse may belong to different dimensions, there’s a shared spirit of competition and unexpected twists that adds a touch of whimsy to our exploration. It’s as if a touch of magic has found its way into our statistical inquiry, creating an unexpected blend of seriousness and enchantment!
On the social media front, a tweet from @MathHumorLover reads, "Lacrosse championships and 'Vihart' searches – talk about a 'curve ball' in statistical analysis! Who knew sports and nerdy math puns could have a connection?" This playful tweet captures the essence of our research – an unexpected curve in the game of statistical analysis, where sports and internet searches meet in a delightful mashup! It's like hitting a "lac-rosy" sweet spot of unexpected correlations and lighthearted musings in the world of academic inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The bittersweet symphony of statistics has yielded some intriguing findings. We found a considerable correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 between the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' from 2007 to 2022. It seems that this unconventional pair indeed dances to the beat of their own drum, or perhaps, to the rhythm of a face-off on the lacrosse field. It's like they say, "When in doubt, stick to the stats!"
The r-squared value of 0.5243565 emphasizes that over 52% of the variability in Google searches for 'Vihart' can be explained by the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship. It's remarkable how even in the world of statistics, odd pairs can come together and create magic, much like the perfect pass leading to a stunning goal.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further supports the notion that this statistical relationship is not a fluke. It seems that there is more to this peculiar connection than meets the eye, just like the unexpected chemistry between peanut butter and pickles – odd, but undeniably intriguing.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the strong correlation between the two variables. This visual representation further solidifies the noteworthy bond between lacrosse final scores and the enthusiasm for 'Vihart' searches. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this one surely speaks volumes about the unorthodox relationship we've uncovered.
In conclusion, our offbeat investigation into the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart' has unveiled a statistically significant correlation. It's a reminder that in the world of research, as in life, serendipitous discoveries can emerge from the most unexpected places. Just like a lacrosse ball can take unpredictable bounces, so too can the world of statistics leave us pleasantly surprised with its quirky relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the discussion of our unconventional research study on the correlation between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart,' it's time to bravely step onto the playing field of statistical banter. Let's "face-off" with the unexpected and delightfully odd connection we've uncovered.

The findings of our study have not only confirmed, but "lac-rosse" above and beyond, the prior research conducted by Smith et al. This affirms the timeless truth - when it comes to statistical analysis, sticking to the facts might just lead to an unexpected "lac-rose" of correlations. It's almost like finding a hidden gem on the lacrosse field – quite unexpected, yet undeniably delightful.

Additionally, the echoes of our results resonate with the stirring insights offered by Doe and Johnson. Just as individuals’ online searches can be influenced by unforeseen factors, it appears that the intensity of lacrosse championship games may indeed spark a fervor for 'Vihart' queries. It's as if statistical analysis and playful curiosity have decided to "play catch" in the realm of academic research, creating a delightful blend of seriousness and whimsy throughout our quirky investigation.

Our findings showcase a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and a p-value of less than 0.01, echoing the sentiment, "When in doubt, stick to the stats!" If anything, our study serves as a delightful reminder that just like the unexpected chemistry between peanut butter and pickles, peculiar statistical connections can prove to be undeniably fascinating.

The solid r-squared value of 0.5243565 further cements the unexpected bond between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' It's an intriguing dance indeed, reminiscent of the unexpected chemistry that arises when unlikely pairs come together. Much like the perfect pass leading to a stunning goal, our statistical odd couple has demonstrated an undeniable flair for the unexpected.

Lastly, the captivating scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 is a visual testament to the unorthodox yet substantial relationship we've uncovered. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this one surely speaks volumes about the delightful curiosity that led to our unexpected discovery.

In the curious world of statistics and academic inquiry, our study serves as a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration. The improbable connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart' stands as a testament to the enchanting whims of serendipitous research. Just like a lacrosse ball can take unpredictable bounces, our statistical inquiry has left us pleasantly surprised with its quirky relationships. And that, dear readers, is a "lac-rosy" reminder of the unexpected joys of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lacrosse and love for Vihart may seem like an odd pair, but our research dives into this peculiar relationship. One might even say we're "sticking" with an unconventional choice of focus. Our study utilizes data from the NCAA and Google Trends to examine the potential connection between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' In this paper, we "stick" to the facts while incorporating a dash of whimsical humor, because, after all, what's life without a bit of a "lac-roast" now and then?

Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. This indicates a statistically significant, albeit quirky, relationship between the intensity of championship games and individuals' searches for Vihart. As we "pass the ball" of knowledge to future researchers, we invite them to embrace a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration in their inquiries.


[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, grab your lacrosse sticks and get ready to dive into an offbeat yet intriguing journey of statistical analysis. As we venture into the world of NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the enigmatic allure of 'Vihart', we are faced with the unexpected fusion of sports and internet search behavior. It's as if the nerdy kid suddenly showed up at the sports field, and surprisingly, they hit it off like peas in a pod! But hey, who are we to judge – even odd pairs can make for exciting dynamics, just like mixing Fritos and M&Ms.
The aim of this study is not just to uncover the statistical relationship between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart', but also to inject a little bit of whimsy and humor into what can sometimes be an overly serious academic landscape. After all, a good dad joke is like a lacrosse ball – it might catch you off guard, but it's all in good fun.
Just as a lacrosse player needs to keep their head up and be aware of all elements on the field, our research keeps an open mind and considers uncharted territories in the realm of statistical analysis. So, let’s lace up our research shoes and get ready to sprint across the field of academia, armed with an arsenal of statistics and a healthy dose of lightheartedness.
Now, some might ask, "What's the deal with finding a connection between lacrosse and Vihart searches?" To them, we say, "Why not?" Life is too short to always play by the rules, and every now and then, a little deviation leads to discovering something remarkable. Just like when a lacrosse player takes an unconventional route to score a goal – or when a nerdy math enthusiast catches the attention of sports aficionados.
So, as we embark on this adventure of statistical exploration, let's keep our sense of humor close at hand and our eyes open for the unexpected. After all, much like a well-executed dad joke, this research might just leave you with an unexpected smirk and a newfound appreciation for the unlikeliest of correlations.

[[RESULTS]]
The bittersweet symphony of statistics has yielded some intriguing findings. We found a considerable correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 between the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' from 2007 to 2022. It seems that this unconventional pair indeed dances to the beat of their own drum, or perhaps, to the rhythm of a face-off on the lacrosse field. It's like they say, "When in doubt, stick to the stats!"
The r-squared value of 0.5243565 emphasizes that over 52% of the variability in Google searches for 'Vihart' can be explained by the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship. It's remarkable how even in the world of statistics, odd pairs can come together and create magic, much like the perfect pass leading to a stunning goal.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 further supports the notion that this statistical relationship is not a fluke. It seems that there is more to this peculiar connection than meets the eye, just like the unexpected chemistry between peanut butter and pickles – odd, but undeniably intriguing.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the strong correlation between the two variables. This visual representation further solidifies the noteworthy bond between lacrosse final scores and the enthusiasm for 'Vihart' searches. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this one surely speaks volumes about the unorthodox relationship we've uncovered.
In conclusion, our offbeat investigation into the connection between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart' has unveiled a statistically significant correlation. It's a reminder that in the world of research, as in life, serendipitous discoveries can emerge from the most unexpected places. Just like a lacrosse ball can take unpredictable bounces, so too can the world of statistics leave us pleasantly surprised with its quirky relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
As we wrap up our whimsical journey through the unexplored "lacrosse" of statistical analysis and Google search behavior, it's clear that there's more to this peculiar connection than meets the eye. Our findings have pointed to a statistically significant correlation between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differentials and Google searches for 'Vihart', with a correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01. It's as if the nerdy math whiz has found their unlikely match on the lacrosse field. Talk about an odd pair scoring big - they might just be the real MVPs of this statistical game!

Now, one might wonder, what's the punchline to this unexpected correlation? Well, much like a well-timed dad joke, sometimes the best connections come from the most unexpected places. Who knew that the intensity of lacrosse championships and the allure of 'Vihart' searches could come together in such a statistically significant manner? It seems that even in the world of data analysis, odd pairs can turn out to be a winning combination.

As we "stick" the landing of our research, it's time to heed the call - there's no need for further investigation in this area. We've "cracked the code" on this unusual yet fascinating relationship, and it's clear that this statistical dalliance between lacrosse final scores and Vihart searches is no fluke. So, let's "call it a game" and celebrate this offbeat discovery with a round of applause - after all, sometimes the most remarkable findings emerge from the most unexpected of pairings! And with that, our research concludes with a resounding dad-inspired mic drop - the "lacrosse" is history, and the statistical future awaits new peculiar relationships to uncover!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Playful Research Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Unconventional Sports Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lax Search: A Correlation Study Between NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship Final Point Differential and Google Searches for 'Vihart' with an abstract of Lacrosse and love for Vihart may seem like an odd pair, but our research dives into this peculiar relationship. One might even say we're "sticking" with an unconventional choice of focus. Our study utilizes data from the NCAA and Google Trends to examine the potential connection between the final point differentials in the NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart.' In this paper, we "stick" to the facts while incorporating a dash of whimsical humor, because, after all, what's life without a bit of a "lac-roast" now and then?
Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7241247 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. This indicates a statistically significant, albeit quirky, relationship between the intensity of championship games and individuals' searches for Vihart. As we "pass the ball" of knowledge to future researchers, we invite them to embrace a delightful "lacrosse" of imagination and exploration in their inquiries.

ChatGPT:

NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship, final point differentials, Google searches, Vihart, correlation study, lacrosse championship games, Google Trends, unusual relationships, research findings, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, data analysis, whimsical humor

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential
Source: NCAA
See what else correlates with NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential

Google searches for 'Vihart'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Vihart' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Vihart'

Correlation r = 0.7241247 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5243565 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 52.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Vihart') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0015. 0.0015141573894275170000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.72 in 0.15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 660 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.36, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential (Points)1311266251324012
Google searches for 'Vihart' (Rel. search volume)3.416671.666671.416673.0833319.166738.542.528.66671813.833311.1667107.333335.166674.166674.66667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,3,1,1,2,6,6,2,5,1,3,2,4,0,1,2,])
array_2 = np.array([3.41667,1.66667,1.41667,3.08333,19.1667,38.5,42.5,28.6667,18,13.8333,11.1667,10,7.33333,5.16667,4.16667,4.66667,])
array_1_name = "NCAA Men's Lacrosse Div I Championship final point differential"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Vihart'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1680 · Black Variable ID: 129 · Red Variable ID: 1452
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0