about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,667 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Milk consumption and the second variable is Arson in Alaska.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Milk consumption decreased, there was a corresponding decrease in the production of lactose. This led to a decrease in the presence of lactose-intolerant individuals in Alaska. With fewer people experiencing dairy-related digestive issues, there were fewer fiery situations in the vicinity, thereby decreasing the incidence of Arson in Alaska. In the end, it was a case of lactose intolerance putting a stop to heated criminal activities.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a TIME magazine cover that showcases a peaceful scene in a cozy Alaskan cabin. Inside the cabin, a person sits by the fireplace, sipping a glass of milk while the warm fire crackles. Meanwhile, outside, a small group of people gather around a bonfire, roasting marshmallows and enjoying the winter night. The cover should capture the serene ambiance, with emphasis on the contrast between the warm, intimate interior and the chilly, snowy surroundings. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cute cartoon A TIME magazine cover image High-tech
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy cabin in Alaska, a person sits by the fireplace, sipping a glass of milk while the warm fire crackles. Outside, a small group of people gather around a bonfire, roasting marshmallows and enjoying the winter night.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy cabin in Alaska, a person sits by the fireplace, sipping a glass of milk while the warm fire crackles. Outside, a small group of people gather around a bonfire, roasting marshmallows and enjoying the winter night. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a TIME magazine cover that showcases a peaceful scene in a cozy Alaskan cabin. Inside the cabin, a person sits by the fireplace, sipping a glass of milk while the warm fire crackles. Meanwhile, outside, a small group of people gather around a bonfire, roasting marshmallows and enjoying the winter night. The cover should capture the serene ambiance, with emphasis on the contrast between the warm, intimate interior and the chilly, snowy surroundings.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Milk consumption caused Arson in Alaska to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska

Journal of Dairy and Deviance

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Alaska. Utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team has uncovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2021. In this study, we thoroughly examine the dairy dynamics of this connection, exploring the potential mechanisms through which milk and arson may be related. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on dairy products' role in Alaska's incendiary activities, shedding light on the puzzling interplay between fire-starting behavior and milk intake. This paper serves as a friendly reminder that the world of statistical research can be as unpredictable and quirky as a cow's moo!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Alaska. Utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team has uncovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2021. In this study, we thoroughly examine the dairy dynamics of this connection, exploring the potential mechanisms through which milk and arson may be related. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on dairy products' role in Alaska's incendiary activities, shedding light on the puzzling interplay between fire-starting behavior and milk intake. This paper serves as a friendly reminder that the world of statistical research can be as unpredictable and quirky as a cow's moo!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Arson, a serious crime that ignites fear in the hearts of communities, and the innocuous act of drinking milk may seem like an unlikely pair. However, our research aims to explore the unexpected connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena in the unique context of Alaska. The idea for this study originated during a casual brainstorming session over a carton of milk. As we pondered the idiosyncrasies of the Last Frontier, our team couldn't help but notice a peculiar pattern – an odd correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents.

Our team's fascination with this unusual relationship led us to embark on an investigative journey worthy of a barnyard mystery novel. Amidst the backdrop of Alaska, known for its breathtaking landscapes and doggedly independent spirit, a statistical anomaly was uncovered. Shrouded in the mystery of cold winters and northern lights, a statistical brouhaha was brewing, and milk was at its core. Our curiosity piqued, we delved into this seemingly udderly ridiculous investigation, driven by the desire to separate fact from fodder.

As we navigate through this paper, we invite readers to don their metaphorical detective hats and grasp the lighthearted nature of our inquiry. Buckle up, because this research endeavor will milk every opportunity to unearth the unexpected and tickle the brain cells that lie dormant in the pasture of traditional academic analysis. So, grab a glass of milk (or not, if you're feeling rebellious) and let's embark on a journey into the puzzling world of cow-based correlations and fiery felonies in the land of the midnight sun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Alaska. Utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team has uncovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2021. In this study, we thoroughly examine the dairy dynamics of this connection, exploring the potential mechanisms through which milk and arson may be related. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on dairy products' role in Alaska's incendiary activities, shedding light on the puzzling interplay between fire-starting behavior and milk intake. This paper serves as a friendly reminder that the world of statistical research can be as unpredictable and quirky as a cow's moo!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Arson, a serious crime that ignites fear in the hearts of communities, and the innocuous act of drinking milk may seem like an unlikely pair. However, our research aims to explore the unexpected connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena in the unique context of Alaska. The idea for this study originated during a casual brainstorming session over a carton of milk. As we pondered the idiosyncrasies of the Last Frontier, our team couldn't help but notice a peculiar pattern – an odd correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents.
Our team's fascination with this unusual relationship led us to embark on an investigative journey worthy of a barnyard mystery novel. Amidst the backdrop of Alaska, known for its breathtaking landscapes and doggedly independent spirit, a statistical anomaly was uncovered. Shrouded in the mystery of cold winters and northern lights, a statistical brouhaha was brewing, and milk was at its core. Our curiosity piqued, we delved into this seemingly udderly ridiculous investigation, driven by the desire to separate fact from fodder.
As we navigate through this paper, we invite readers to don their metaphorical detective hats and grasp the lighthearted nature of our inquiry. Buckle up, because this research endeavor will milk every opportunity to unearth the unexpected and tickle the brain cells that lie dormant in the pasture of traditional academic analysis. So, grab a glass of milk (or not, if you're feeling rebellious) and let's embark on a journey into the puzzling world of cow-based correlations and fiery felonies in the land of the midnight sun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Dairy Dilemma: Exploring the Inextricable Link Between Milk and Unlikely Offenses," Smith and Doe paved the way for investigating dairy products' unforeseen implications on criminal activities. Their comprehensive analysis grappled with the enigma of dairy-derived correlations to peculiar felonious behaviors, providing a solid foundation for our current study. Furthermore, Jones et al. demonstrated a compelling connection between dietary habits and deviant behavior in "Nutrition and Nefarious Activities," shedding light on the obscure interplay between consumables and criminal tendencies.

Taking a step beyond academic literature, non-fiction works such as "Milk: The White Gold of Alaska" by Anderson and "Fire Starters: A History of Arson in the Last Frontier" by Brown offered insightful perspectives. These texts delineated the socioeconomic and cultural landscapes in Alaska, elucidating the idiosyncrasies of milk consumption and arson incidents in the region. Additionally, fictional narratives such as "The Mystery of the Flaming Udder" by Christie and "Milk and Mayhem: A Dairy Detective Tale" by Chandler injected a touch of whimsy into the exploration of our research theme.

In our quest for a whimsical yet informative approach to literature review, we delved into unconventional sources such as grocery store receipts, considering the possibility of latent insights hidden within the mundane details of daily transactions. While not a conventional academic practice, this method allowed us to uncover surprising correlations and even discover a coupon for chocolate milk that sparked an epiphany regarding the sweet but perilous nature of dairy indulgence.

As we traverse the scholarly and not-so-scholarly literature on the topic, we can't help but admire the resilience of the human spirit – and the bovine spirit, for that matter – in the face of improbable connections and outlandish hypotheses. The bibliographic trail may twist and turn like a curly straw in a glass of milk, but our appetite for uncovering the unexpected remains unwavering.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Alaska. Utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team has uncovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2021. In this study, we thoroughly examine the dairy dynamics of this connection, exploring the potential mechanisms through which milk and arson may be related. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on dairy products' role in Alaska's incendiary activities, shedding light on the puzzling interplay between fire-starting behavior and milk intake. This paper serves as a friendly reminder that the world of statistical research can be as unpredictable and quirky as a cow's moo!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Arson, a serious crime that ignites fear in the hearts of communities, and the innocuous act of drinking milk may seem like an unlikely pair. However, our research aims to explore the unexpected connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena in the unique context of Alaska. The idea for this study originated during a casual brainstorming session over a carton of milk. As we pondered the idiosyncrasies of the Last Frontier, our team couldn't help but notice a peculiar pattern – an odd correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents.
Our team's fascination with this unusual relationship led us to embark on an investigative journey worthy of a barnyard mystery novel. Amidst the backdrop of Alaska, known for its breathtaking landscapes and doggedly independent spirit, a statistical anomaly was uncovered. Shrouded in the mystery of cold winters and northern lights, a statistical brouhaha was brewing, and milk was at its core. Our curiosity piqued, we delved into this seemingly udderly ridiculous investigation, driven by the desire to separate fact from fodder.
As we navigate through this paper, we invite readers to don their metaphorical detective hats and grasp the lighthearted nature of our inquiry. Buckle up, because this research endeavor will milk every opportunity to unearth the unexpected and tickle the brain cells that lie dormant in the pasture of traditional academic analysis. So, grab a glass of milk (or not, if you're feeling rebellious) and let's embark on a journey into the puzzling world of cow-based correlations and fiery felonies in the land of the midnight sun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our quest to unravel the enigmatic relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in Alaska, we employed a rigorous blend of statistical analysis, data mining, and a dash of dairy-inspired detective work. First, we scoured the vast pastures of the internet, roaming through fields of USDA databases and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, in search of the choicest data nuggets. Gleaning information spanning from 1990 to 2021, we milked these sources for all they were worth, ensuring that our dataset was as rich and creamy as a freshly churned batch of butter.

As with any investigative endeavor, we faced our fair share of challenges. Data cleaning became a Herculean task, akin to separating curd from whey, as we sifted through years of statistics, piecing together the puzzle of milk consumption and arson incidents. We also encountered the occasional statistical hiccups, requiring us to wield our data analysis tools with finesse and a keen eye for detail. It was a journey as unpredictable as a lactose-intolerant cow at an ice cream social.

Once our dataset was pruned of outliers and sorted into a delectable spread of variables, we dived into the statistical arena with the fervor of a caffeine-fueled cappuccino connoisseur. Employing correlation analysis, we sought to uncover the hidden patterns lurking within the numbers, sifting through the statistical haystack for the proverbial dairy needle. Our statistical sleuthing yielded a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7802856, gleaming like a fresh milk mustache on a toddler's face.

The next step in our research odyssey involved conducting regression analysis to untangle the intricate web of causation and correlation, akin to separating the strands of mozzarella on a steaming-hot pizza. With each regression model, we sought to elucidate the potential mechanisms driving the observed relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents, carefully examining variables such as temperature, population density, and perhaps even the psychological effects of consuming too much cream.

In parallel to our statistical foray, we embarked on a quirky qualitative exploration, seeking anecdotal evidence and contextual clues akin to a scavenger hunt in the dairy aisle. We tapped into the collective knowledge of cow enthusiasts, forensic scientists, and cheeky pun aficionados, marshaling a diverse array of perspectives in our pursuit of a holistic understanding of the perplexing milk-arson nexus.

In our data analysis, we vigorously embraced the spirit of exploration, combining the precision of a mathematician with the inquisitiveness of a dairy-loving philosopher. Our methodology, much like the research question itself, reflects the whimsical nature of our endeavor, affirming that research can indeed be as playful as a calf frolicking in a sun-dappled meadow.

In the next section, we will delve into the compelling findings that emerged from our data-crunching exploits, shedding light on the compelling associations between milk consumption and arson incidents in the rugged terrain of Alaska. So, hold onto your milk jugs, because the bovine-inspired revelations are about to flow like a river of freshly squeezed dairy enlightenment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7802856, r-squared of 0.6088456, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Alaska. Utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team has uncovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2021. In this study, we thoroughly examine the dairy dynamics of this connection, exploring the potential mechanisms through which milk and arson may be related. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on dairy products' role in Alaska's incendiary activities, shedding light on the puzzling interplay between fire-starting behavior and milk intake. This paper serves as a friendly reminder that the world of statistical research can be as unpredictable and quirky as a cow's moo!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Arson, a serious crime that ignites fear in the hearts of communities, and the innocuous act of drinking milk may seem like an unlikely pair. However, our research aims to explore the unexpected connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena in the unique context of Alaska. The idea for this study originated during a casual brainstorming session over a carton of milk. As we pondered the idiosyncrasies of the Last Frontier, our team couldn't help but notice a peculiar pattern – an odd correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents.
Our team's fascination with this unusual relationship led us to embark on an investigative journey worthy of a barnyard mystery novel. Amidst the backdrop of Alaska, known for its breathtaking landscapes and doggedly independent spirit, a statistical anomaly was uncovered. Shrouded in the mystery of cold winters and northern lights, a statistical brouhaha was brewing, and milk was at its core. Our curiosity piqued, we delved into this seemingly udderly ridiculous investigation, driven by the desire to separate fact from fodder.
As we navigate through this paper, we invite readers to don their metaphorical detective hats and grasp the lighthearted nature of our inquiry. Buckle up, because this research endeavor will milk every opportunity to unearth the unexpected and tickle the brain cells that lie dormant in the pasture of traditional academic analysis. So, grab a glass of milk (or not, if you're feeling rebellious) and let's embark on a journey into the puzzling world of cow-based correlations and fiery felonies in the land of the midnight sun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]
The connection between milk consumption and arson in Alaska proved to be a veritable statistical hot spot. Our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7802856, indicating a strong association between these two variables. This correlation was further bolstered by a substantial r-squared value of 0.6088456, highlighting the substantial proportion of variance in arson incidents that can be attributed to milk consumption. Moreover, the p-value of < 0.01 attested to the statistical significance of this relationship, providing compelling evidence of a genuine link between the dairy domain and the incendiary inclinations within the Alaskan landscape.

As depicted in Fig. 1, our scatterplot clearly illustrates the striking correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents, visually capturing the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate phenomena. The upward trend line in the scatterplot serves as a graphical testament to the noteworthy positive relationship, solidifying the unexpected union between dairy indulgence and fiery criminal behavior in the northern reaches of the United States.

The findings from this study not only elevate the status of milk from a mere beverage to a potential ingredient in the enigmatic recipe for arson but also shed light on the quirky and capricious nature of statistical relationships, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, udderly astonishing discoveries are always a possibility. These results prompt us to reflect on the notion that research pursuits, much like a glass of milk left unattended, can sometimes curdle into captivating narratives that challenge conventional wisdom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Alaska. Utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team has uncovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2021. In this study, we thoroughly examine the dairy dynamics of this connection, exploring the potential mechanisms through which milk and arson may be related. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on dairy products' role in Alaska's incendiary activities, shedding light on the puzzling interplay between fire-starting behavior and milk intake. This paper serves as a friendly reminder that the world of statistical research can be as unpredictable and quirky as a cow's moo!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Dairy Dilemma: Exploring the Inextricable Link Between Milk and Unlikely Offenses," Smith and Doe paved the way for investigating dairy products' unforeseen implications on criminal activities. Their comprehensive analysis grappled with the enigma of dairy-derived correlations to peculiar felonious behaviors, providing a solid foundation for our current study. Furthermore, Jones et al. demonstrated a compelling connection between dietary habits and deviant behavior in "Nutrition and Nefarious Activities," shedding light on the obscure interplay between consumables and criminal tendencies.
Taking a step beyond academic literature, non-fiction works such as "Milk: The White Gold of Alaska" by Anderson and "Fire Starters: A History of Arson in the Last Frontier" by Brown offered insightful perspectives. These texts delineated the socioeconomic and cultural landscapes in Alaska, elucidating the idiosyncrasies of milk consumption and arson incidents in the region. Additionally, fictional narratives such as "The Mystery of the Flaming Udder" by Christie and "Milk and Mayhem: A Dairy Detective Tale" by Chandler injected a touch of whimsy into the exploration of our research theme.
In our quest for a whimsical yet informative approach to literature review, we delved into unconventional sources such as grocery store receipts, considering the possibility of latent insights hidden within the mundane details of daily transactions. While not a conventional academic practice, this method allowed us to uncover surprising correlations and even discover a coupon for chocolate milk that sparked an epiphany regarding the sweet but perilous nature of dairy indulgence.
As we traverse the scholarly and not-so-scholarly literature on the topic, we can't help but admire the resilience of the human spirit – and the bovine spirit, for that matter – in the face of improbable connections and outlandish hypotheses. The bibliographic trail may twist and turn like a curly straw in a glass of milk, but our appetite for uncovering the unexpected remains unwavering.

[[RESULTS]]
The connection between milk consumption and arson in Alaska proved to be a veritable statistical hot spot. Our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7802856, indicating a strong association between these two variables. This correlation was further bolstered by a substantial r-squared value of 0.6088456, highlighting the substantial proportion of variance in arson incidents that can be attributed to milk consumption. Moreover, the p-value of < 0.01 attested to the statistical significance of this relationship, providing compelling evidence of a genuine link between the dairy domain and the incendiary inclinations within the Alaskan landscape.
As depicted in Fig. 1, our scatterplot clearly illustrates the striking correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents, visually capturing the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate phenomena. The upward trend line in the scatterplot serves as a graphical testament to the noteworthy positive relationship, solidifying the unexpected union between dairy indulgence and fiery criminal behavior in the northern reaches of the United States.
The findings from this study not only elevate the status of milk from a mere beverage to a potential ingredient in the enigmatic recipe for arson but also shed light on the quirky and capricious nature of statistical relationships, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, udderly astonishing discoveries are always a possibility. These results prompt us to reflect on the notion that research pursuits, much like a glass of milk left unattended, can sometimes curdle into captivating narratives that challenge conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has unveiled a strikingly strong correlation between milk consumption and arson in Alaska, corroborating the findings of previous studies that explored the intricate nexus between dietary habits and deviant behavior. The significant correlation coefficient and the low p-value reaffirm the unexpected and robust link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the notion of milk playing a role in arson may initially appear as implausible as a dairy cow's somersault, our results demonstrate that statistical inquiry can bring to light the most curious associations, much like finding a needle in a haystack made of hay.

Returning to the whimsical and atypical sources in our literature review, the exploration of grocery store receipts and the revelation of a chocolate milk coupon sparked a peculiar insight into the deceptive allure of dairy consumption. The coupon's revelation prompted us to ponder the potential tantalizing, yet perilous, nature of indulging in dairy delights. The playful musings of non-fiction works "Milk: The White Gold of Alaska" and "Fire Starters: A History of Arson in the Last Frontier" also provided invaluable cultural context for our findings, reminding us that the undercurrents of criminal behavior can sometimes flow through unexpected channels, much like a river of milk snaking through the iced landscape of Alaska.

The visually compelling scatterplot, akin to an abstract artwork depicting the ebb and flow of criminal predilections, conveys a narrative that extends beyond mere data points. It tells a tale of surprising connection and the capricious nature of statistical relationships, serving as a reminder that in the world of data analysis, unexpected associations can take form as readily as whipped cream topping a mug of cocoa.

In conclusion, the results of our study bring to light the unexpected and quirky interplay between milk consumption and arson in Alaska, underscoring the notion that in the realm of statistical inquiry, the peculiar and offbeat can hold unexpected truth. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic relationship between dairy products and deviant behavior, we must remain open to the possibility that statistical exploration can churn out discoveries as surprising as a cow executing a coordinated dance routine.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Alaska. Utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team has uncovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2021. In this study, we thoroughly examine the dairy dynamics of this connection, exploring the potential mechanisms through which milk and arson may be related. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on dairy products' role in Alaska's incendiary activities, shedding light on the puzzling interplay between fire-starting behavior and milk intake. This paper serves as a friendly reminder that the world of statistical research can be as unpredictable and quirky as a cow's moo!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Arson, a serious crime that ignites fear in the hearts of communities, and the innocuous act of drinking milk may seem like an unlikely pair. However, our research aims to explore the unexpected connection between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena in the unique context of Alaska. The idea for this study originated during a casual brainstorming session over a carton of milk. As we pondered the idiosyncrasies of the Last Frontier, our team couldn't help but notice a peculiar pattern – an odd correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents.
Our team's fascination with this unusual relationship led us to embark on an investigative journey worthy of a barnyard mystery novel. Amidst the backdrop of Alaska, known for its breathtaking landscapes and doggedly independent spirit, a statistical anomaly was uncovered. Shrouded in the mystery of cold winters and northern lights, a statistical brouhaha was brewing, and milk was at its core. Our curiosity piqued, we delved into this seemingly udderly ridiculous investigation, driven by the desire to separate fact from fodder.
As we navigate through this paper, we invite readers to don their metaphorical detective hats and grasp the lighthearted nature of our inquiry. Buckle up, because this research endeavor will milk every opportunity to unearth the unexpected and tickle the brain cells that lie dormant in the pasture of traditional academic analysis. So, grab a glass of milk (or not, if you're feeling rebellious) and let's embark on a journey into the puzzling world of cow-based correlations and fiery felonies in the land of the midnight sun.

[[RESULTS]]
The connection between milk consumption and arson in Alaska proved to be a veritable statistical hot spot. Our analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7802856, indicating a strong association between these two variables. This correlation was further bolstered by a substantial r-squared value of 0.6088456, highlighting the substantial proportion of variance in arson incidents that can be attributed to milk consumption. Moreover, the p-value of < 0.01 attested to the statistical significance of this relationship, providing compelling evidence of a genuine link between the dairy domain and the incendiary inclinations within the Alaskan landscape.
As depicted in Fig. 1, our scatterplot clearly illustrates the striking correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents, visually capturing the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate phenomena. The upward trend line in the scatterplot serves as a graphical testament to the noteworthy positive relationship, solidifying the unexpected union between dairy indulgence and fiery criminal behavior in the northern reaches of the United States.
The findings from this study not only elevate the status of milk from a mere beverage to a potential ingredient in the enigmatic recipe for arson but also shed light on the quirky and capricious nature of statistical relationships, reminding us that in the world of data analysis, udderly astonishing discoveries are always a possibility. These results prompt us to reflect on the notion that research pursuits, much like a glass of milk left unattended, can sometimes curdle into captivating narratives that challenge conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents in Alaska has undoubtedly produced some "udderly" fascinating findings. The remarkably high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value indicate a compelling link between these unlikely bedfellows. While the precise mechanisms underlying this association remain as shrouded in mystery as the Alaskan wilderness, our research has undoubtedly stirred the pot, or shall we say, churned the milk, in the realm of statistical inquiry.

This research, while somewhat "cheesy" in its exploratory nature, has highlighted the potential for dairy products to be a factor in incendiary activities, adding a new layer of complexity to the already multifaceted world of criminal behavior. As we mull over these results, it becomes clear that the relationship between milk and arson is not just a statistical anomaly but a curious quirk of the human experience - a reminder that the world of data analysis can be as unpredictable as the whims of a lactose-intolerant cow.

In the grand scheme of things, the implications of our findings may seem as enigmatic as a cow's enigmatic gaze, but they serve to reinforce the notion that the pursuit of knowledge can be as serendipitous and surprising as stumbling upon a carton of milk in the Arctic tundra. As such, we are confident that this research opens up new avenues for interdisciplinary exploration, whether in the realm of criminal psychology, dairy industry marketing strategies, or agricultural policy.

In light of these revelatory findings, we firmly assert that further research in this area is as unnecessary as crying over spilled milk. After all, sometimes the most "moo-ving" discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of places, reminding us that academic inquiry, like a dairy product nearing its expiration date, should continue to be both thought-provoking and deliciously unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Dairy and Deviance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Consumer Behavior Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Got Milk? The Unlikely Link Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Alaska with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected association between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Alaska. Utilizing data from the USDA and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team has uncovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.7802856 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2021. In this study, we thoroughly examine the dairy dynamics of this connection, exploring the potential mechanisms through which milk and arson may be related. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on dairy products' role in Alaska's incendiary activities, shedding light on the puzzling interplay between fire-starting behavior and milk intake. This paper serves as a friendly reminder that the world of statistical research can be as unpredictable and quirky as a cow's moo!

ChatGPT:

milk consumption, arson incidents, Alaska, dairy products, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, USDA, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, fire-starting behavior, milk intake

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Milk consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Fluid beverage milk in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Milk consumption

Arson in Alaska
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Alaska
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Alaska

Correlation r = 0.7802856 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6088456 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Alaska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Milk consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-7. 0.0000001394396641887843800000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 1.4E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,171,561 random variables You don't actually need 7 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Milk consumption (Pounds per person)220218215210208205205201198197196192191188185185185183181181177173169164158155153149145141141134
Arson in Alaska (Arson rate)3435.633.736.245.439.229.528.62929.232.235.538.238.927.4243338.524.327.224.930.725.620.919.724.719.418.817.328.419.48.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([220,218,215,210,208,205,205,201,198,197,196,192,191,188,185,185,185,183,181,181,177,173,169,164,158,155,153,149,145,141,141,134,])
array_2 = np.array([34,35.6,33.7,36.2,45.4,39.2,29.5,28.6,29,29.2,32.2,35.5,38.2,38.9,27.4,24,33,38.5,24.3,27.2,24.9,30.7,25.6,20.9,19.7,24.7,19.4,18.8,17.3,28.4,19.4,8.9,])
array_1_name = "Milk consumption"
array_2_name = "Arson in Alaska"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 1667 · Black Variable ID: 554 · Red Variable ID: 20037
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0