about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,652 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Biomass power generated in Thailand and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America.  The chart goes from 1995 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The surplus rice husks and coconut shells used for biomass power production were accidentally getting mixed in with the materials for car parts, leading to an unexpected and highly renewable but structurally unsound new line of Volkswagen vehicles. Thailands' commitment to green energy inadvertently led to the production of cars that were a little too "organic" for their own good.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a detailed black-and-white newspaper illustration of a vibrant cityscape in Thailand, with a towering biomass power plant emitting steam from its smokestacks. In front of the plant, depict a line of Volkswagen vehicles, with technicians from Volkswagen Group of America working diligently to address a recall issue. Emphasize the commitment to sustainability and environmental responsibility through the imagery of the bustling city and the symbiotic relationship between the power plant and the efforts of the technicians. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal A photo-realistic image Vaporwave A black-and-white newspaper illustration Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city in Thailand, a biomass power plant stands tall, with its smokestacks emitting steam as energy is generated from organic materials. In front of the plant, a line of Volkswagen vehicles are parked, as technicians from Volkswagen Group of America work to address a recall issue, showing their commitment to sustainability and addressing environmental concerns.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city in Thailand, a biomass power plant stands tall, with its smokestacks emitting steam as energy is generated from organic materials. In front of the plant, a line of Volkswagen vehicles are parked, as technicians from Volkswagen Group of America work to address a recall issue, showing their commitment to sustainability and addressing environmental concerns. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a detailed black-and-white newspaper illustration of a vibrant cityscape in Thailand, with a towering biomass power plant emitting steam from its smokestacks. In front of the plant, depict a line of Volkswagen vehicles, with technicians from Volkswagen Group of America working diligently to address a recall issue. Emphasize the commitment to sustainability and environmental responsibility through the imagery of the bustling city and the symbiotic relationship between the power plant and the efforts of the technicians.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Biomass power generated in Thailand caused Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America

The Journal of Ecological Engineering and Automotive Mishaps

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and p < 0.01 for 1995 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we endeavored to shed some light on the peculiar interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. Drawing on data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1995 to 2021, we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between seemingly disparate realms of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, highlighting the need for further investigation into this biomass-baffling correlation. While our results may raise eyebrows, it is important to approach them with a grain of biomass, noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Nonetheless, this study points to the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, proving that when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the results can be as surprising as a sudden vehicle recall.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we endeavored to shed some light on the peculiar interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. Drawing on data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1995 to 2021, we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between seemingly disparate realms of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, highlighting the need for further investigation into this biomass-baffling correlation. While our results may raise eyebrows, it is important to approach them with a grain of biomass, noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Nonetheless, this study points to the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, proving that when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the results can be as surprising as a sudden vehicle recall.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Initializing this investigation, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains: the utilization of biomass power in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. The rationale for exploring this incongruous pairing arises from the eternally delightful mysteries and whimsies of statistical analysis. We stumbled upon this unexpected nexus and couldn't resist the temptation to delve into the correlation between biomass burn and befuddling blunders in the automotive industry.

As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities, it becomes evident that statistical analysis, like a good joke, often holds unexpected twists and punchlines. The initial motivation for this inquiry was to ascertain whether there exists a discernible connection between the utilization of biomass energy and the frequency of automotive recalls by a prominent manufacturer. However, we soon realized that much akin to a well-crafted pun, statistical investigation often reveals surprising and unexpected associations.

With a chuckle and a raised eyebrow, we embarked on this quest armed with a formidable array of data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation. Our statistical odyssey spans the years 1995 to 2021, a time frame rife with the ebbs and flows of both biomass power generation in Thailand and the automotive industry's unforeseen hiccups.

Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our investigation, statistical rigor has been the guiding star of our endeavor. Through a meticulous and robust analysis, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352, a figure that carries more weight than a well-timed punchline. Furthermore, the p-value emerging from our analysis is less than 0.01, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings and prompting a quizzical arch of the researcher's eyebrow.

This paper serves as a modest attempt to unravel the perplexing interplay between biomass power and automotive recalls, a conundrum that might occasionally leave one scratching their head, much like a cryptic riddle. We invite the reader to join us in this statistical escapade, where the unexpected connection between biomass burn and befuddling blunders unfolds before us, reminding us that in the realm of statistical analysis, there's always room for a good chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we endeavored to shed some light on the peculiar interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. Drawing on data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1995 to 2021, we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between seemingly disparate realms of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, highlighting the need for further investigation into this biomass-baffling correlation. While our results may raise eyebrows, it is important to approach them with a grain of biomass, noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Nonetheless, this study points to the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, proving that when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the results can be as surprising as a sudden vehicle recall.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Initializing this investigation, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains: the utilization of biomass power in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. The rationale for exploring this incongruous pairing arises from the eternally delightful mysteries and whimsies of statistical analysis. We stumbled upon this unexpected nexus and couldn't resist the temptation to delve into the correlation between biomass burn and befuddling blunders in the automotive industry.
As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities, it becomes evident that statistical analysis, like a good joke, often holds unexpected twists and punchlines. The initial motivation for this inquiry was to ascertain whether there exists a discernible connection between the utilization of biomass energy and the frequency of automotive recalls by a prominent manufacturer. However, we soon realized that much akin to a well-crafted pun, statistical investigation often reveals surprising and unexpected associations.
With a chuckle and a raised eyebrow, we embarked on this quest armed with a formidable array of data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation. Our statistical odyssey spans the years 1995 to 2021, a time frame rife with the ebbs and flows of both biomass power generation in Thailand and the automotive industry's unforeseen hiccups.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our investigation, statistical rigor has been the guiding star of our endeavor. Through a meticulous and robust analysis, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352, a figure that carries more weight than a well-timed punchline. Furthermore, the p-value emerging from our analysis is less than 0.01, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings and prompting a quizzical arch of the researcher's eyebrow.

This paper serves as a modest attempt to unravel the perplexing interplay between biomass power and automotive recalls, a conundrum that might occasionally leave one scratching their head, much like a cryptic riddle. We invite the reader to join us in this statistical escapade, where the unexpected connection between biomass burn and befuddling blunders unfolds before us, reminding us that in the realm of statistical analysis, there's always room for a good chuckle.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2009) presents a comprehensive analysis of biomass power generation in Southeast Asia, delving into the intricate web of economic, environmental, and social implications associated with this burgeoning industry. The study offers valuable insights into the dynamics of biomass energy in Thailand, elucidating the multifaceted factors influencing its proliferation and impact on the regional energy landscape. Turning our attention to automotive recalls, Doe (2015) examines the factors contributing to product recalls in the automotive industry, highlighting the multifarious complexities inherent in quality control and supply chain management. Jones (2020) further enriches the literature by exploring the intersection of sustainability and manufacturing practices, shedding light on the intricate dance between environmental responsibility and production processes.

As we venture deeper into the obscure relationship between biomass power generation and automotive recalls, it is prudent to acknowledge the intersecting realms of non-fiction literature that have contributed to our understanding of these phenomena. "The Big Burn: Teddy Roosevelt and the Fire That Saved America" by Timothy Egan adds a historical backdrop to the concept of biomass burn, while "Biomass Energy" by Faye Brown provides a comprehensive overview of biomass utilization and its implications. Shifting our focus to automotive recalls, "Car Trouble" by Robert B. Fairbanks offers a sociological perspective on consumer perceptions of automotive quality, resonating with the unforeseen challenges faced by industry giants like the Volkswagen Group of America.

In a departure from non-fiction contributions, numerous fictional works metaphorically encapsulate the perplexing correlation between biomass power and automotive recalls. "The Diesel War" by Djunabaeff Volodya whimsically weaves a tale of industrial intrigue and vehicular mishaps, serving as a playful allegory for the whimsical interplay between biomass burn and befuddling automotive blunders. Furthermore, "Fueling the Flames" by E. Smokescreen offers a satirical take on the ecological and mechanical amalgamation that characterizes the biomass-energy-automotive-recall continuum.

The silver screen also provides tangential glimpses into this enigmatic nexus, with movies such as "The Fast and the Combustible" and "Recall Resurgence: The Bio-Breakdown" navigating the turbulent waters of automotive mishaps and the fiery underbelly of biomass power generation.

By immersing ourselves in a diverse array of literature and media, we cultivate a nuanced perspective on the intersecting terrains of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, reminding us that even in the scholarly domain, a touch of whimsy and humor can illuminate the most unexpected correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1995 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we endeavored to shed some light on the peculiar interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. Drawing on data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1995 to 2021, we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between seemingly disparate realms of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, highlighting the need for further investigation into this biomass-baffling correlation. While our results may raise eyebrows, it is important to approach them with a grain of biomass, noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Nonetheless, this study points to the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, proving that when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the results can be as surprising as a sudden vehicle recall.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Initializing this investigation, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains: the utilization of biomass power in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. The rationale for exploring this incongruous pairing arises from the eternally delightful mysteries and whimsies of statistical analysis. We stumbled upon this unexpected nexus and couldn't resist the temptation to delve into the correlation between biomass burn and befuddling blunders in the automotive industry.
As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities, it becomes evident that statistical analysis, like a good joke, often holds unexpected twists and punchlines. The initial motivation for this inquiry was to ascertain whether there exists a discernible connection between the utilization of biomass energy and the frequency of automotive recalls by a prominent manufacturer. However, we soon realized that much akin to a well-crafted pun, statistical investigation often reveals surprising and unexpected associations.
With a chuckle and a raised eyebrow, we embarked on this quest armed with a formidable array of data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation. Our statistical odyssey spans the years 1995 to 2021, a time frame rife with the ebbs and flows of both biomass power generation in Thailand and the automotive industry's unforeseen hiccups.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our investigation, statistical rigor has been the guiding star of our endeavor. Through a meticulous and robust analysis, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352, a figure that carries more weight than a well-timed punchline. Furthermore, the p-value emerging from our analysis is less than 0.01, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings and prompting a quizzical arch of the researcher's eyebrow.

This paper serves as a modest attempt to unravel the perplexing interplay between biomass power and automotive recalls, a conundrum that might occasionally leave one scratching their head, much like a cryptic riddle. We invite the reader to join us in this statistical escapade, where the unexpected connection between biomass burn and befuddling blunders unfolds before us, reminding us that in the realm of statistical analysis, there's always room for a good chuckle.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this research endeavor that straddles the realms of renewable energy and automotive mishaps, we set out to employ a methodological approach that is as robust as it is lively, much like a high-octane car ride through the statistical landscape. Our data collection process primarily involved trawling through the vast expanse of the internet, akin to a digital treasure hunt, with a particular focus on gathering information from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation. The years 1995 to 2021 formed the temporal canvas upon which our statistical masterpiece was crafted, capturing the undulating tides of biomass power generation and the unforeseen rollercoaster of automotive recalls issued by the Volkswagen Group of America.

The first step in our methodology involved wrangling and harmonizing the multifaceted data sets obtained from these reputable sources, akin to orchestrating a symphony of statistical insights. This amalgamation of data points and metrics painted a colorful canvas of the biomass power landscape in Thailand and the snags encountered in the automotive domain, much like an abstract work of art with an undercurrent of statistical significance.

To capture the essence of the interplay between biomass power and automotive recalls, we employed a variety of statistical analyses that could rival the twists and turns of a gripping mystery novel. Spearheaded by everyone's favorite correlation coefficient, Pearson's r, our pursuit of quantifying the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena was further embellished by scatterplots that resembled constellations in the statistical galaxy. We also ventured into the realm of time-series analysis, akin to delving into a historical memoir, to unravel the temporal dynamics of this biomass-baffling correlation.

Furthermore, our statistical toolkit was honed with the inclusion of hypothesis testing, with the venerable p-value taking center stage as our trusty guide through the labyrinth of statistical significance. This allowed us to scrutinize the robustness of the observed correlation, akin to discerning the clarity of a riddle's solution in the symphony of statistical noise.

While the confluence of biomass power and automotive recalls may seem like an odd couple, akin to an unexpected pairing in a comedy duo, our methodology endeavored to treat this statistical conundrum with the gravity it deserves, all the while infusing a touch of statistical whimsy into the investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT .

For the time period 1995 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9387352, r-squared of 0.8812237, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we endeavored to shed some light on the peculiar interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. Drawing on data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1995 to 2021, we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between seemingly disparate realms of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, highlighting the need for further investigation into this biomass-baffling correlation. While our results may raise eyebrows, it is important to approach them with a grain of biomass, noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Nonetheless, this study points to the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, proving that when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the results can be as surprising as a sudden vehicle recall.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Initializing this investigation, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains: the utilization of biomass power in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. The rationale for exploring this incongruous pairing arises from the eternally delightful mysteries and whimsies of statistical analysis. We stumbled upon this unexpected nexus and couldn't resist the temptation to delve into the correlation between biomass burn and befuddling blunders in the automotive industry.
As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities, it becomes evident that statistical analysis, like a good joke, often holds unexpected twists and punchlines. The initial motivation for this inquiry was to ascertain whether there exists a discernible connection between the utilization of biomass energy and the frequency of automotive recalls by a prominent manufacturer. However, we soon realized that much akin to a well-crafted pun, statistical investigation often reveals surprising and unexpected associations.
With a chuckle and a raised eyebrow, we embarked on this quest armed with a formidable array of data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation. Our statistical odyssey spans the years 1995 to 2021, a time frame rife with the ebbs and flows of both biomass power generation in Thailand and the automotive industry's unforeseen hiccups.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our investigation, statistical rigor has been the guiding star of our endeavor. Through a meticulous and robust analysis, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352, a figure that carries more weight than a well-timed punchline. Furthermore, the p-value emerging from our analysis is less than 0.01, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings and prompting a quizzical arch of the researcher's eyebrow.

This paper serves as a modest attempt to unravel the perplexing interplay between biomass power and automotive recalls, a conundrum that might occasionally leave one scratching their head, much like a cryptic riddle. We invite the reader to join us in this statistical escapade, where the unexpected connection between biomass burn and befuddling blunders unfolds before us, reminding us that in the realm of statistical analysis, there's always room for a good chuckle.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation has unveiled an intriguing correlation between biomass power generation in Thailand and automotive recalls issued by the Volkswagen Group of America. The correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 indicates a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8812237, signifying that a substantial proportion of the variability in automotive recalls can be explained by the fluctuations in biomass power generation. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this finding, prompting raised eyebrows and the occasional stifled chuckle among the research team.

Our investigation culminates in the creation of a visually compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) showcasing the robust correlation observed between biomass power generation and automotive recalls. The figure portrays the striking interplay between these two variables, offering a graphic depiction of the unexpected connection we have uncovered.

Our research not only establishes a quantifiable relationship between biomass power generation in Thailand and automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America but also sheds light on the quirky, unpredictable nature of statistical analysis. While causation cannot be inferred from correlation alone, the strength of the association detected between these two domains is as unmistakable as a well-executed punchline. This study serves as a reminder that the world of statistics can be as delightfully surprising as stumbling upon a clever pun, illuminating unexpected connections and prompting further exploration of the whimsical intricacies that underlie our datasets.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we endeavored to shed some light on the peculiar interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. Drawing on data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1995 to 2021, we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between seemingly disparate realms of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, highlighting the need for further investigation into this biomass-baffling correlation. While our results may raise eyebrows, it is important to approach them with a grain of biomass, noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Nonetheless, this study points to the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, proving that when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the results can be as surprising as a sudden vehicle recall.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2009) presents a comprehensive analysis of biomass power generation in Southeast Asia, delving into the intricate web of economic, environmental, and social implications associated with this burgeoning industry. The study offers valuable insights into the dynamics of biomass energy in Thailand, elucidating the multifaceted factors influencing its proliferation and impact on the regional energy landscape. Turning our attention to automotive recalls, Doe (2015) examines the factors contributing to product recalls in the automotive industry, highlighting the multifarious complexities inherent in quality control and supply chain management. Jones (2020) further enriches the literature by exploring the intersection of sustainability and manufacturing practices, shedding light on the intricate dance between environmental responsibility and production processes.
As we venture deeper into the obscure relationship between biomass power generation and automotive recalls, it is prudent to acknowledge the intersecting realms of non-fiction literature that have contributed to our understanding of these phenomena. "The Big Burn: Teddy Roosevelt and the Fire That Saved America" by Timothy Egan adds a historical backdrop to the concept of biomass burn, while "Biomass Energy" by Faye Brown provides a comprehensive overview of biomass utilization and its implications. Shifting our focus to automotive recalls, "Car Trouble" by Robert B. Fairbanks offers a sociological perspective on consumer perceptions of automotive quality, resonating with the unforeseen challenges faced by industry giants like the Volkswagen Group of America.
In a departure from non-fiction contributions, numerous fictional works metaphorically encapsulate the perplexing correlation between biomass power and automotive recalls. "The Diesel War" by Djunabaeff Volodya whimsically weaves a tale of industrial intrigue and vehicular mishaps, serving as a playful allegory for the whimsical interplay between biomass burn and befuddling automotive blunders. Furthermore, "Fueling the Flames" by E. Smokescreen offers a satirical take on the ecological and mechanical amalgamation that characterizes the biomass-energy-automotive-recall continuum.
The silver screen also provides tangential glimpses into this enigmatic nexus, with movies such as "The Fast and the Combustible" and "Recall Resurgence: The Bio-Breakdown" navigating the turbulent waters of automotive mishaps and the fiery underbelly of biomass power generation.
By immersing ourselves in a diverse array of literature and media, we cultivate a nuanced perspective on the intersecting terrains of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, reminding us that even in the scholarly domain, a touch of whimsy and humor can illuminate the most unexpected correlations.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation has unveiled an intriguing correlation between biomass power generation in Thailand and automotive recalls issued by the Volkswagen Group of America. The correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 indicates a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8812237, signifying that a substantial proportion of the variability in automotive recalls can be explained by the fluctuations in biomass power generation. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this finding, prompting raised eyebrows and the occasional stifled chuckle among the research team.
Our investigation culminates in the creation of a visually compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) showcasing the robust correlation observed between biomass power generation and automotive recalls. The figure portrays the striking interplay between these two variables, offering a graphic depiction of the unexpected connection we have uncovered.
Our research not only establishes a quantifiable relationship between biomass power generation in Thailand and automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America but also sheds light on the quirky, unpredictable nature of statistical analysis. While causation cannot be inferred from correlation alone, the strength of the association detected between these two domains is as unmistakable as a well-executed punchline. This study serves as a reminder that the world of statistics can be as delightfully surprising as stumbling upon a clever pun, illuminating unexpected connections and prompting further exploration of the whimsical intricacies that underlie our datasets.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study offer an intriguing glimpse into the labyrinthine interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and automotive recalls issued by the Volkswagen Group of America. Our results align with prior research, validating the hidden depths of our whimsical literature review. To our surprise, the correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 mirrors the unexpected relationship subtly hinted at in Djunabaeff Volodya's "The Diesel War." A work of fiction it may be, but the parallels to our statistical findings cannot be discounted. The r-squared value of 0.8812237 further solidifies the robustness of this connection, akin to stumbling upon an unexpected punchline in an academic conference.

The statistical significance of this correlation, as denoted by the p-value of less than 0.01, reinforces the validity of our findings and affirms that the unexpected can indeed be quantifiably proven. Our research may have raised eyebrows, akin to the reception of "Recall Resurgence: The Bio-Breakdown" in cinema, but it serves as a reminder that statistical analyses can hold delightful surprise—much like the unexpected delight of a pun cleverly woven into the discourse.

It is crucial to emphasize that while our study unearths a thought-provoking correlation, we must approach it with the cautionary grain of biomass, acknowledging that correlation does not inherently imply causation. Nevertheless, like a well-timed joke, our study sheds light on the intricate dance between seemingly unrelated industries, provoking further investigation into the whimsical intertwining of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing. This work solidifies the notion that statistical analysis can be as whimsical as it is rigorous, unveiling unexpected correlations and prompting further exploration of the delightful intricacies that underlie our datasets.

This study not only confirms the surprising interrelation between biomass power generation and automotive recalls but also beckons for a continued exploration of these peculiar connections, providing a reminder that even in the hallowed halls of academia, the unexpected can oftentimes take center stage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Thailand and Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we endeavored to shed some light on the peculiar interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. Drawing on data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1995 to 2021, we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between seemingly disparate realms of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, highlighting the need for further investigation into this biomass-baffling correlation. While our results may raise eyebrows, it is important to approach them with a grain of biomass, noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Nonetheless, this study points to the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, proving that when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the results can be as surprising as a sudden vehicle recall.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Initializing this investigation, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains: the utilization of biomass power in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. The rationale for exploring this incongruous pairing arises from the eternally delightful mysteries and whimsies of statistical analysis. We stumbled upon this unexpected nexus and couldn't resist the temptation to delve into the correlation between biomass burn and befuddling blunders in the automotive industry.
As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities, it becomes evident that statistical analysis, like a good joke, often holds unexpected twists and punchlines. The initial motivation for this inquiry was to ascertain whether there exists a discernible connection between the utilization of biomass energy and the frequency of automotive recalls by a prominent manufacturer. However, we soon realized that much akin to a well-crafted pun, statistical investigation often reveals surprising and unexpected associations.
With a chuckle and a raised eyebrow, we embarked on this quest armed with a formidable array of data sourced from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation. Our statistical odyssey spans the years 1995 to 2021, a time frame rife with the ebbs and flows of both biomass power generation in Thailand and the automotive industry's unforeseen hiccups.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our investigation, statistical rigor has been the guiding star of our endeavor. Through a meticulous and robust analysis, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352, a figure that carries more weight than a well-timed punchline. Furthermore, the p-value emerging from our analysis is less than 0.01, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings and prompting a quizzical arch of the researcher's eyebrow.

This paper serves as a modest attempt to unravel the perplexing interplay between biomass power and automotive recalls, a conundrum that might occasionally leave one scratching their head, much like a cryptic riddle. We invite the reader to join us in this statistical escapade, where the unexpected connection between biomass burn and befuddling blunders unfolds before us, reminding us that in the realm of statistical analysis, there's always room for a good chuckle.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation has unveiled an intriguing correlation between biomass power generation in Thailand and automotive recalls issued by the Volkswagen Group of America. The correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 indicates a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8812237, signifying that a substantial proportion of the variability in automotive recalls can be explained by the fluctuations in biomass power generation. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this finding, prompting raised eyebrows and the occasional stifled chuckle among the research team.
Our investigation culminates in the creation of a visually compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) showcasing the robust correlation observed between biomass power generation and automotive recalls. The figure portrays the striking interplay between these two variables, offering a graphic depiction of the unexpected connection we have uncovered.
Our research not only establishes a quantifiable relationship between biomass power generation in Thailand and automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America but also sheds light on the quirky, unpredictable nature of statistical analysis. While causation cannot be inferred from correlation alone, the strength of the association detected between these two domains is as unmistakable as a well-executed punchline. This study serves as a reminder that the world of statistics can be as delightfully surprising as stumbling upon a clever pun, illuminating unexpected connections and prompting further exploration of the whimsical intricacies that underlie our datasets.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled a seemingly improbable yet robust correlation between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. The correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and the significant p-value of less than 0.01, akin to an unexpectedly amusing punchline, emphasize the statistical significance of this association. Our findings, though bemusing at first glance, highlight the need for further exploration into the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, much like stumbling upon a witty pun in an otherwise serious conversation.

It is evident that statistical analysis, like a well-timed joke, can unearth unexpected connections that both intrigue and amuse. While our results may initially evoke raised eyebrows and puzzled expressions, much like an enigmatic riddle, they underscore the intricate and often unpredictable nature of statistical relationships. As we wrap up this statistical escapade, we assert that the correlation uncovered between biomass burn and automotive blunders leaves little room for doubt, and it prompts a knowing grin among the inquisitive minds delving into this baffling interplay.

In light of our findings, we assert with a touch of statistical bravado that no further research in this area is needed. The interconnectedness of biomass power generation in Thailand and automotive recalls by Volkswagen Group of America, much like a well-crafted pun, stands as a testament to the delightfully surprising nature of statistical analysis. This study leaves us with a gentle reminder that, in the realm of statistical exploration, sometimes the most captivating discoveries unfold with an unexpected twist and a dash of statistical humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Engineering and Automotive Mishaps


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Renewable Energy Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Biomass Burn and Befuddling Blunders: Investigating the Interplay between Biomass Power in Thailand and Automotive Recalls by Volkswagen Group of America with an abstract of In this study, we endeavored to shed some light on the peculiar interplay between biomass power generation in Thailand and the issuance of automotive recalls by the Volkswagen Group of America. Drawing on data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1995 to 2021, we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9387352 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between seemingly disparate realms of biomass energy and automotive manufacturing, highlighting the need for further investigation into this biomass-baffling correlation. While our results may raise eyebrows, it is important to approach them with a grain of biomass, noting that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Nonetheless, this study points to the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, proving that when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the results can be as surprising as a sudden vehicle recall.

ChatGPT:

Biomass power generation Thailand, automotive recalls, Volkswagen Group of America, correlation coefficient analysis, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Transportation, biomass energy, automotive manufacturing, statistical analysis, correlation vs causation, interconnectedness of industries.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Biomass power generated in Thailand
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Thailand in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Thailand

Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Volkswagen Group of America
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America

Correlation r = 0.9387352 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8812237 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Biomass power generated in Thailand) over the 27 years from 1995 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.6E-13. 0.0000000000004550551837231892
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 4.6E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,197,535,674,285 random variables You don't actually need 2 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 26 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 26 because we have two variables measured over a period of 27 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Biomass power generated in Thailand (Billion kWh)0.2880.860.3430.3190.8660.5090.4920.6861.1511.281.531.4691.7962.6063.0713.3854.2864.4016.6977.1597.43617.98915.386316.334218.484116.616119.7916
Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America (Recalls)3556765688510698211541113252735273034




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.288,0.86,0.343,0.319,0.866,0.509,0.492,0.686,1.151,1.28,1.53,1.469,1.796,2.606,3.071,3.385,4.286,4.401,6.697,7.159,7.436,17.989,15.3863,16.3342,18.4841,16.6161,19.7916,])
array_2 = np.array([3,5,5,6,7,6,5,6,8,8,5,10,6,9,8,2,11,5,4,11,13,25,27,35,27,30,34,])
array_1_name = "Biomass power generated in Thailand"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 1652 · Black Variable ID: 24033 · Red Variable ID: 1120
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0