about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,612 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Milk consumption and the second variable is Arson in Wyoming.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As milk consumption decreased, there was a subsequent decrease in the production of lactose, which is a sugar. With less lactose in people's systems, there were fewer flammable fart incidents, ultimately leading to a decrease in accidental fires and therefore a decrease in arson in Wyoming.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a tranquil Wyoming town at dusk. In the foreground, a group of people sits on their front porches, enjoying glasses of milk as the evening sun bathes the scene in warm light. Meanwhile, in the distance, smoke billows up from a small barn where a lone figure stands, throwing a match into the hay. The simplicity of the scene should evoke a sense of quietude amid the impending danger. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration A photo-realistic image A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Psychedelic Parallax art
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a tranquil Wyoming town, a group of people are sitting on their front porches enjoying glasses of milk in the evening sun. Meanwhile, in the distance, smoke billows up from a small barn where a lone figure stands, throwing a match into the hay.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a tranquil Wyoming town, a group of people are sitting on their front porches enjoying glasses of milk in the evening sun. Meanwhile, in the distance, smoke billows up from a small barn where a lone figure stands, throwing a match into the hay. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a tranquil Wyoming town at dusk. In the foreground, a group of people sits on their front porches, enjoying glasses of milk as the evening sun bathes the scene in warm light. Meanwhile, in the distance, smoke billows up from a small barn where a lone figure stands, throwing a match into the hay. The simplicity of the scene should evoke a sense of quietude amid the impending danger.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Milk consumption caused Arson in Wyoming to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming

The Bovine Chronicle

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between milk consumption and arson in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we rigorously examined the correlation between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson from 1990 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicative of a robust statistical relationship. These findings illuminate an unforeseen interplay between dairy intake and fiery transgressions, challenging conventional wisdom and underscoring the need for further investigation into the udderly bizarre influences on arson behavior. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying this intriguing association and implications for public policy, while also encouraging readers to mull over the utterly bewildering nature of statistical relationships that may seem utterly unrelated – just like milk and arson in Wyoming.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between milk consumption and arson in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we rigorously examined the correlation between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson from 1990 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicative of a robust statistical relationship. These findings illuminate an unforeseen interplay between dairy intake and fiery transgressions, challenging conventional wisdom and underscoring the need for further investigation into the udderly bizarre influences on arson behavior. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying this intriguing association and implications for public policy, while also encouraging readers to mull over the utterly bewildering nature of statistical relationships that may seem utterly unrelated – just like milk and arson in Wyoming.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Consumption of milk has long been an integral part of human dietary habits, with its proponents extolling its numerous health benefits, while detractors lamenting its alleged potential for lactose-induced pandemonium. On the other hand, arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has historically been associated with criminal activities and pyromaniac proclivities. The conjunction of these seemingly incongruous phenomena – milk consumption and arson – in the state of Wyoming presents a perplexing conundrum that piques the curiosity of both researchers and casual observers alike.

It is unlikely that any milk enthusiast could have fathomed a clandestine connection between their lactose-laden beverages and the smoldering aftermath of arson incidents. Conversely, it is equally improbable that individuals engaging in arson activities had contemplated the creamy correlation between their deeds and the conspicuous presence of milk in the state's refrigerators. Yet, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic bond, or lack thereof, between these ostensibly unrelated factors, invoking a blend of statistical rigor and a pinch of cow-themed puns for good measure.

The dairy industry in Wyoming, renowned for its bucolic landscapes and bovine residents, has served as a vanguard of milk production within the region. Meanwhile, arson incidents, although not as pervasive as the ubiquitous cowboy hats, have still left their fiery mark on the state's historical tapestry. Amidst this mosaic of agricultural serenity and the sporadic conflagrations, lies an unexpected statistical liaison that demands scrutiny.

In light of the aforementioned, we embark on a statistical odyssey to unravel the underlying threads of this unlikely companionship – the cosmic ballet of dairy consumption and criminal fire-starting. Our investigation seeks not only to decipher the puzzling linkage but also to shed light on the potential implications for public health, agricultural policy, and law enforcement strategies. As we venture forth into this surreptitious landscape, we implore the reader to mull over the improbable relationship between milk and arson in Wyoming, while also contemplating the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations. After all, as the saying goes, when it comes to statistical relationships, sometimes the correlation truly lies "udder" the surface.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between milk consumption and arson in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we rigorously examined the correlation between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson from 1990 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicative of a robust statistical relationship. These findings illuminate an unforeseen interplay between dairy intake and fiery transgressions, challenging conventional wisdom and underscoring the need for further investigation into the udderly bizarre influences on arson behavior. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying this intriguing association and implications for public policy, while also encouraging readers to mull over the utterly bewildering nature of statistical relationships that may seem utterly unrelated – just like milk and arson in Wyoming.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Consumption of milk has long been an integral part of human dietary habits, with its proponents extolling its numerous health benefits, while detractors lamenting its alleged potential for lactose-induced pandemonium. On the other hand, arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has historically been associated with criminal activities and pyromaniac proclivities. The conjunction of these seemingly incongruous phenomena – milk consumption and arson – in the state of Wyoming presents a perplexing conundrum that piques the curiosity of both researchers and casual observers alike.
It is unlikely that any milk enthusiast could have fathomed a clandestine connection between their lactose-laden beverages and the smoldering aftermath of arson incidents. Conversely, it is equally improbable that individuals engaging in arson activities had contemplated the creamy correlation between their deeds and the conspicuous presence of milk in the state's refrigerators. Yet, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic bond, or lack thereof, between these ostensibly unrelated factors, invoking a blend of statistical rigor and a pinch of cow-themed puns for good measure.
The dairy industry in Wyoming, renowned for its bucolic landscapes and bovine residents, has served as a vanguard of milk production within the region. Meanwhile, arson incidents, although not as pervasive as the ubiquitous cowboy hats, have still left their fiery mark on the state's historical tapestry. Amidst this mosaic of agricultural serenity and the sporadic conflagrations, lies an unexpected statistical liaison that demands scrutiny.
In light of the aforementioned, we embark on a statistical odyssey to unravel the underlying threads of this unlikely companionship – the cosmic ballet of dairy consumption and criminal fire-starting. Our investigation seeks not only to decipher the puzzling linkage but also to shed light on the potential implications for public health, agricultural policy, and law enforcement strategies. As we venture forth into this surreptitious landscape, we implore the reader to mull over the improbable relationship between milk and arson in Wyoming, while also contemplating the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations. After all, as the saying goes, when it comes to statistical relationships, sometimes the correlation truly lies "udder" the surface.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) in their study "Milk Consumption and Unforeseen Consequences: A Statistical Odyssey" scrutinized the purported effects of milk consumption on various societal phenomena. While the authors primarily focused on health outcomes, their comprehensive analysis inadvertently offered tantalizing hints regarding the potential impact of dairy intake on criminal behavior. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the multifaceted nature of arson in their seminal work "Fiery Escapades: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pyromaniac Tendencies." Although their investigation centered on psychological underpinnings, it hinted at unrecognized external influences, including dietary proclivities that remain unexplored.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Big Book of Dairy Dilemmas" by Casey Greenberg and "Arson and Agriculture: A Wyoming Case Study" by Patricia Black shed light on the intricate intertwining of seemingly unrelated topics, offering food for thought in understanding the peculiar connection between milk consumption and arson. Furthermore, fictional works such as "The Milk Conspiracy" by Arthur T. Milkman and "Arson on the Range" by Sally Sizzle provide a whimsical foray into the realm of dairy-driven mischiefs under the vast Wyoming sky.

It is noteworthy to mention the popular internet meme "Milkman vs. Arsonist," which, although speculative in nature, humorously juxtaposes the ostensibly opposing archetypes, hinting at the inexplicable allure of such contrasting elements coalescing in unforeseen ways. This palpable undercurrent of intrigue underpins the current investigation, prompting a deeper exploration of the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between milk consumption and arson in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we rigorously examined the correlation between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson from 1990 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicative of a robust statistical relationship. These findings illuminate an unforeseen interplay between dairy intake and fiery transgressions, challenging conventional wisdom and underscoring the need for further investigation into the udderly bizarre influences on arson behavior. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying this intriguing association and implications for public policy, while also encouraging readers to mull over the utterly bewildering nature of statistical relationships that may seem utterly unrelated – just like milk and arson in Wyoming.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Consumption of milk has long been an integral part of human dietary habits, with its proponents extolling its numerous health benefits, while detractors lamenting its alleged potential for lactose-induced pandemonium. On the other hand, arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has historically been associated with criminal activities and pyromaniac proclivities. The conjunction of these seemingly incongruous phenomena – milk consumption and arson – in the state of Wyoming presents a perplexing conundrum that piques the curiosity of both researchers and casual observers alike.
It is unlikely that any milk enthusiast could have fathomed a clandestine connection between their lactose-laden beverages and the smoldering aftermath of arson incidents. Conversely, it is equally improbable that individuals engaging in arson activities had contemplated the creamy correlation between their deeds and the conspicuous presence of milk in the state's refrigerators. Yet, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic bond, or lack thereof, between these ostensibly unrelated factors, invoking a blend of statistical rigor and a pinch of cow-themed puns for good measure.
The dairy industry in Wyoming, renowned for its bucolic landscapes and bovine residents, has served as a vanguard of milk production within the region. Meanwhile, arson incidents, although not as pervasive as the ubiquitous cowboy hats, have still left their fiery mark on the state's historical tapestry. Amidst this mosaic of agricultural serenity and the sporadic conflagrations, lies an unexpected statistical liaison that demands scrutiny.
In light of the aforementioned, we embark on a statistical odyssey to unravel the underlying threads of this unlikely companionship – the cosmic ballet of dairy consumption and criminal fire-starting. Our investigation seeks not only to decipher the puzzling linkage but also to shed light on the potential implications for public health, agricultural policy, and law enforcement strategies. As we venture forth into this surreptitious landscape, we implore the reader to mull over the improbable relationship between milk and arson in Wyoming, while also contemplating the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations. After all, as the saying goes, when it comes to statistical relationships, sometimes the correlation truly lies "udder" the surface.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection and Sampling:
The data for this udderly intriguing study was meticulously gathered from a variety of sources, with a predominant focus on information provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. The USDA, with its wealth of dairy consumption statistics, allowed us to milk every last drop of information on per capita milk intake in Wyoming. Meanwhile, the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services regaled us with riveting tales of arson incidents, providing the much-needed spark for our investigative endeavors.

Our research team, comprised of individuals with a penchant for both statistical analysis and dairy-related puns, took great care in procuring data spanning over three decades, from 1990 to 2021. The temporal expanse of the dataset aimed to capture the nuances of milk consumption trends and arson incidents, allowing for a robust examination of their unlikely interplay.

Statistical Analysis:
Having amassed a bountiful harvest of data, we subjected the numbers to a meticulous and methodical analysis to tease out any hint of correlation between milk consumption and arson. The statistical tools at our disposal were as sharp as a farmer's pitchfork, enabling us to conduct thorough exploration of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

The Pearson correlation coefficient, akin to the trusty dairy herd dog, was employed to quantify the degree and direction of association between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson. This stalwart statistic revealed the strength of the linear relationship between the two variables, guiding us through the statistical pastures as we sought to decipher the curious bond between udderly innocent dairy intake and the fiery transgressions of arson.

Furthermore, a careful consideration of the p-value, akin to determining the creaminess of a milk sample, was undertaken to assess the significance of the observed correlation. The p-value, falling below the conventional threshold of 0.01, provided palpable evidence of a robust statistical relationship, lending credence to the unexpected entwinement of milk and arson in the vast expanse of Wyoming.

Ethical Considerations:
As we delved into the unexplored frontier of milk-arson dynamics, we remained steadfast in upholding ethical standards of data usage and interpretation. The privacy and sanctity of individual dairy-consuming and arson-inclined entities were safeguarded with utmost diligence, ensuring that our analysis was conducted with the utmost reverence for ethical protocols.

In conclusion, our methodology, juxtaposing robust statistical analysis with an unapologetic display of dairy-related witticisms, has enabled us to unravel the perplexing correlation between milk consumption and arson in Wyoming. With the data rigorously scrutinized and the statistical tools judiciously wielded, we stand poised to unveil the enigmatic interplay between these unlikely bedfellows and shed light on the bewitching statistical associations that often lie udder the surface, waiting to be discovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9025393, r-squared of 0.8145773, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between milk consumption and arson in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we rigorously examined the correlation between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson from 1990 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicative of a robust statistical relationship. These findings illuminate an unforeseen interplay between dairy intake and fiery transgressions, challenging conventional wisdom and underscoring the need for further investigation into the udderly bizarre influences on arson behavior. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying this intriguing association and implications for public policy, while also encouraging readers to mull over the utterly bewildering nature of statistical relationships that may seem utterly unrelated – just like milk and arson in Wyoming.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Consumption of milk has long been an integral part of human dietary habits, with its proponents extolling its numerous health benefits, while detractors lamenting its alleged potential for lactose-induced pandemonium. On the other hand, arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has historically been associated with criminal activities and pyromaniac proclivities. The conjunction of these seemingly incongruous phenomena – milk consumption and arson – in the state of Wyoming presents a perplexing conundrum that piques the curiosity of both researchers and casual observers alike.
It is unlikely that any milk enthusiast could have fathomed a clandestine connection between their lactose-laden beverages and the smoldering aftermath of arson incidents. Conversely, it is equally improbable that individuals engaging in arson activities had contemplated the creamy correlation between their deeds and the conspicuous presence of milk in the state's refrigerators. Yet, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic bond, or lack thereof, between these ostensibly unrelated factors, invoking a blend of statistical rigor and a pinch of cow-themed puns for good measure.
The dairy industry in Wyoming, renowned for its bucolic landscapes and bovine residents, has served as a vanguard of milk production within the region. Meanwhile, arson incidents, although not as pervasive as the ubiquitous cowboy hats, have still left their fiery mark on the state's historical tapestry. Amidst this mosaic of agricultural serenity and the sporadic conflagrations, lies an unexpected statistical liaison that demands scrutiny.
In light of the aforementioned, we embark on a statistical odyssey to unravel the underlying threads of this unlikely companionship – the cosmic ballet of dairy consumption and criminal fire-starting. Our investigation seeks not only to decipher the puzzling linkage but also to shed light on the potential implications for public health, agricultural policy, and law enforcement strategies. As we venture forth into this surreptitious landscape, we implore the reader to mull over the improbable relationship between milk and arson in Wyoming, while also contemplating the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations. After all, as the saying goes, when it comes to statistical relationships, sometimes the correlation truly lies "udder" the surface.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and incidents of arson in Wyoming from 1990 to 2021 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 (p < 0.01), indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further substantiates this association, yielding a value of 0.8145773, suggesting that approximately 81.5% of the variance in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. Notably, the level of correlation observed here is udderly impressive, evoking contemplation of what other unlikely duos may be lurking in the annals of data.

Figure 1 provides a visual representation of this peculiar association, depicting a scatterplot that demonstrates the strikingly linear relationship between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson. The figure serves as a compelling testament to the unexpected interconnectedness of these two phenomena and may elicit a few raised eyebrows from those unacquainted with the world of statistical oddities.

The findings of this study challenge conventional paradigms and beckon researchers to delve further into the enigmatic realm of statistical correlations. The sheer implausibility of this connection invites contemplation on the myriad unexpected coalescences that may lie in wait within the realms of data. This serendipitous discovery not only broadens our understanding of statistical relationships but also underscores the captivating unpredictability that pervades the fabric of empirical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between milk consumption and arson in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we rigorously examined the correlation between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson from 1990 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicative of a robust statistical relationship. These findings illuminate an unforeseen interplay between dairy intake and fiery transgressions, challenging conventional wisdom and underscoring the need for further investigation into the udderly bizarre influences on arson behavior. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying this intriguing association and implications for public policy, while also encouraging readers to mull over the utterly bewildering nature of statistical relationships that may seem utterly unrelated – just like milk and arson in Wyoming.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) in their study "Milk Consumption and Unforeseen Consequences: A Statistical Odyssey" scrutinized the purported effects of milk consumption on various societal phenomena. While the authors primarily focused on health outcomes, their comprehensive analysis inadvertently offered tantalizing hints regarding the potential impact of dairy intake on criminal behavior. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the multifaceted nature of arson in their seminal work "Fiery Escapades: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pyromaniac Tendencies." Although their investigation centered on psychological underpinnings, it hinted at unrecognized external influences, including dietary proclivities that remain unexplored.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Big Book of Dairy Dilemmas" by Casey Greenberg and "Arson and Agriculture: A Wyoming Case Study" by Patricia Black shed light on the intricate intertwining of seemingly unrelated topics, offering food for thought in understanding the peculiar connection between milk consumption and arson. Furthermore, fictional works such as "The Milk Conspiracy" by Arthur T. Milkman and "Arson on the Range" by Sally Sizzle provide a whimsical foray into the realm of dairy-driven mischiefs under the vast Wyoming sky.
It is noteworthy to mention the popular internet meme "Milkman vs. Arsonist," which, although speculative in nature, humorously juxtaposes the ostensibly opposing archetypes, hinting at the inexplicable allure of such contrasting elements coalescing in unforeseen ways. This palpable undercurrent of intrigue underpins the current investigation, prompting a deeper exploration of the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and incidents of arson in Wyoming from 1990 to 2021 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 (p < 0.01), indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further substantiates this association, yielding a value of 0.8145773, suggesting that approximately 81.5% of the variance in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. Notably, the level of correlation observed here is udderly impressive, evoking contemplation of what other unlikely duos may be lurking in the annals of data.
Figure 1 provides a visual representation of this peculiar association, depicting a scatterplot that demonstrates the strikingly linear relationship between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson. The figure serves as a compelling testament to the unexpected interconnectedness of these two phenomena and may elicit a few raised eyebrows from those unacquainted with the world of statistical oddities.
The findings of this study challenge conventional paradigms and beckon researchers to delve further into the enigmatic realm of statistical correlations. The sheer implausibility of this connection invites contemplation on the myriad unexpected coalescences that may lie in wait within the realms of data. This serendipitous discovery not only broadens our understanding of statistical relationships but also underscores the captivating unpredictability that pervades the fabric of empirical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The udderly perplexing relationship between milk consumption and arson in Wyoming has left us utterly flabbergasted, to say the least. Our findings not only corroborate previous hints in the literature but also unearth a statistically robust and compelling link between these ostensibly unrelated variables. Smith et al.'s (2015) inadvertent inklings concerning dairy's wider societal ramifications now receive unprecedented validation, as our results unequivocally support the notion of milk's hand in playing with fire. Furthermore, the subtle nods in Doe and Jones's (2018) work towards external influences on arson are now brought to the forefront, underscoring the multifaceted nature of dairy's impact on pyromaniac tendencies.

As we mull over these results, the underlying mechanisms governing this curious association remain tantalizingly enigmatic. Could it be that lactose-induced euphoria motivates individuals to partake in fiery escapades, or perhaps the incendiary properties of calcium in milk spark impulsive behaviors? The dairy tale of causation and correlation in arson is ripe for further exploration, holding promise for an array of puns and cheesy investigative attempts.

Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite reflection on the sheer unpredictability of statistical relationships. This discovery not only underscores the captivating enigma that underlies empirical inquiry but also raises the question: What other unexpected pairings await discovery? Are there clandestine connections between ice cream consumption and ice theft? Do cheese-eating habits correlate with cheesy movie preferences? The realm of statistics is rife with curious potential pairings, leading us to ponder the quirky nature of the quantitative world.

In conclusion, the flamingly eccentric relationship between milk consumption and arson in Wyoming has kindled a fiery curiosity in our quest for understanding the inexplicable interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena. The unexpected heat radiating from this statistical oddity infuses our research with a fervent appreciation for the peculiar, beckoning us to embrace the whimsical and delightfully absurd aspects of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between milk consumption and arson in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we rigorously examined the correlation between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson from 1990 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicative of a robust statistical relationship. These findings illuminate an unforeseen interplay between dairy intake and fiery transgressions, challenging conventional wisdom and underscoring the need for further investigation into the udderly bizarre influences on arson behavior. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying this intriguing association and implications for public policy, while also encouraging readers to mull over the utterly bewildering nature of statistical relationships that may seem utterly unrelated – just like milk and arson in Wyoming.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Consumption of milk has long been an integral part of human dietary habits, with its proponents extolling its numerous health benefits, while detractors lamenting its alleged potential for lactose-induced pandemonium. On the other hand, arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has historically been associated with criminal activities and pyromaniac proclivities. The conjunction of these seemingly incongruous phenomena – milk consumption and arson – in the state of Wyoming presents a perplexing conundrum that piques the curiosity of both researchers and casual observers alike.
It is unlikely that any milk enthusiast could have fathomed a clandestine connection between their lactose-laden beverages and the smoldering aftermath of arson incidents. Conversely, it is equally improbable that individuals engaging in arson activities had contemplated the creamy correlation between their deeds and the conspicuous presence of milk in the state's refrigerators. Yet, our research endeavors to unravel the enigmatic bond, or lack thereof, between these ostensibly unrelated factors, invoking a blend of statistical rigor and a pinch of cow-themed puns for good measure.
The dairy industry in Wyoming, renowned for its bucolic landscapes and bovine residents, has served as a vanguard of milk production within the region. Meanwhile, arson incidents, although not as pervasive as the ubiquitous cowboy hats, have still left their fiery mark on the state's historical tapestry. Amidst this mosaic of agricultural serenity and the sporadic conflagrations, lies an unexpected statistical liaison that demands scrutiny.
In light of the aforementioned, we embark on a statistical odyssey to unravel the underlying threads of this unlikely companionship – the cosmic ballet of dairy consumption and criminal fire-starting. Our investigation seeks not only to decipher the puzzling linkage but also to shed light on the potential implications for public health, agricultural policy, and law enforcement strategies. As we venture forth into this surreptitious landscape, we implore the reader to mull over the improbable relationship between milk and arson in Wyoming, while also contemplating the sheer unpredictability of statistical associations. After all, as the saying goes, when it comes to statistical relationships, sometimes the correlation truly lies "udder" the surface.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and incidents of arson in Wyoming from 1990 to 2021 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 (p < 0.01), indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further substantiates this association, yielding a value of 0.8145773, suggesting that approximately 81.5% of the variance in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. Notably, the level of correlation observed here is udderly impressive, evoking contemplation of what other unlikely duos may be lurking in the annals of data.
Figure 1 provides a visual representation of this peculiar association, depicting a scatterplot that demonstrates the strikingly linear relationship between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson. The figure serves as a compelling testament to the unexpected interconnectedness of these two phenomena and may elicit a few raised eyebrows from those unacquainted with the world of statistical oddities.
The findings of this study challenge conventional paradigms and beckon researchers to delve further into the enigmatic realm of statistical correlations. The sheer implausibility of this connection invites contemplation on the myriad unexpected coalescences that may lie in wait within the realms of data. This serendipitous discovery not only broadens our understanding of statistical relationships but also underscores the captivating unpredictability that pervades the fabric of empirical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed a compelling statistical relationship between milk consumption and arson in Wyoming, challenging conventional assumptions and sowing the seeds of intrigue in the field of dairy-related crime. The robust correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination support the existence of an unexpected kinship between these seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to ponder the whimsical nature of statistical interplay. As we milk every possible interpretation from these findings, it becomes increasingly clear that the udderly bizarre connection between milk and arson transcends mere happenstance, posing a profound puzzle for contemplation.

While our research has shed light on this dairy-fueled conundrum, it also beckons us to consider the broader implications of such unexpected statistical relationships. The implications for public health, agricultural policy, and law enforcement strategies are far-reaching, resonating with a peculiar resonance that challenges traditional understandings. As the age-old adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and in this case, where there's milk, there's a statistical conundrum worth mulling over.

In light of these results, we stress the importance of further exploration into the interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. However, we assert that no more research is needed in this area, and we implore future scholars to pour their investigative efforts into equally absurd and whimsical statistical inquiries. After all, as we bid adieu to this quirky expedition, we are left to savor the delightful absurdity of statistical relationships – a reminder that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Bovine Chronicle


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Dairy-Driven Demographics and Deviant Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Got Milk? Exploring the Udderly Bizarre Relationship Between Milk Consumption and Arson in Wyoming with an abstract of This study delves into the curious connection between milk consumption and arson in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning over three decades, we rigorously examined the correlation between per capita milk consumption and incidents of arson from 1990 to 2021. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025393 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicative of a robust statistical relationship. These findings illuminate an unforeseen interplay between dairy intake and fiery transgressions, challenging conventional wisdom and underscoring the need for further investigation into the udderly bizarre influences on arson behavior. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying this intriguing association and implications for public policy, while also encouraging readers to mull over the utterly bewildering nature of statistical relationships that may seem utterly unrelated – just like milk and arson in Wyoming.

ChatGPT:

milk consumption, arson, Wyoming, correlation, USDA data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, statistical relationship, dairy intake, public policy, bizarre influences, arson behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Milk consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Fluid beverage milk in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Milk consumption

Arson in Wyoming
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Wyoming
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Wyoming

Correlation r = 0.9025393 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8145773 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Wyoming) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Milk consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-12. 0.0000000000016737862904657577
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 1.7E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 597,447,837,694 random variables You don't actually need 597 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Milk consumption (Pounds per person)220218215210208205205201198197196192191188185185185183181181177173169164158155153149145141141134
Arson in Wyoming (Arson rate)33.332.232.228.535.725.427.223.523.320.924.123.514.215.5201317.31420.711.812.610.217.27.76.78.77.48.36.47.99.19.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([220,218,215,210,208,205,205,201,198,197,196,192,191,188,185,185,185,183,181,181,177,173,169,164,158,155,153,149,145,141,141,134,])
array_2 = np.array([33.3,32.2,32.2,28.5,35.7,25.4,27.2,23.5,23.3,20.9,24.1,23.5,14.2,15.5,20,13,17.3,14,20.7,11.8,12.6,10.2,17.2,7.7,6.7,8.7,7.4,8.3,6.4,7.9,9.1,9.1,])
array_1_name = "Milk consumption"
array_2_name = "Arson in Wyoming"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1612 · Black Variable ID: 554 · Red Variable ID: 20076
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0