about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,603 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn and the second variable is Viewership of The Big Bang Theory.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn started exhibiting corny behavior, which resonated with the sitcom's style, creating a-MAIZE-ing new material for the show.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a black-and-white newspaper illustration in the style of etching depicting a cozy living room scene. In the center, a family of four is gathered around a well-worn sofa, engrossed in watching "The Big Bang Theory" on their vintage TV set. The screen displays the quirky characters of the show. In front of them, on a cluttered coffee table, prominently sits a large bowl of crispy, buttery popcorn. The popcorn is made from delicious GMO corn, highlighted by its perfect uniformity and plump kernels. The family's contented expressions and comfortable surroundings convey the simple enjoyment of a modern pastime made possible by GMO technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation A black-and-white newspaper illustration Hyper-realistic Cubism Oragami
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy living room, a family settles in to watch "The Big Bang Theory" on TV. On the coffee table in front of them is a bowl of crispy, buttery popcorn made from delicious GMO corn. The TV screen shows the quirky characters of the show, while the family enjoys their snack made possible by GMO technology.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room, a family settles in to watch "The Big Bang Theory" on TV. On the coffee table in front of them is a bowl of crispy, buttery popcorn made from delicious GMO corn. The TV screen shows the quirky characters of the show, while the family enjoys their snack made possible by GMO technology. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a black-and-white newspaper illustration in the style of etching depicting a cozy living room scene. In the center, a family of four is gathered around a well-worn sofa, engrossed in watching "The Big Bang Theory" on their vintage TV set. The screen displays the quirky characters of the show. In front of them, on a cluttered coffee table, prominently sits a large bowl of crispy, buttery popcorn. The popcorn is made from delicious GMO corn, highlighted by its perfect uniformity and plump kernels. The family's contented expressions and comfortable surroundings convey the simple enjoyment of a modern pastime made possible by GMO technology.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn caused Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of The Big Bang Theory

The Journal of Agri-Comedy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevailing hypothesis that GMOs hold the key to the universe was scrutinized in this study, which sought to explore the potential connection between the usage of genetically modified corn and the viewership of the popular television show "The Big Bang Theory". Utilizing USDA data on GMO corn production and viewership statistics from Wikipedia, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 2008 to 2019. Surprisingly, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 with a p-value less than 0.01 was uncovered, suggesting a remarkably strong association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and open the aperture for further investigation into the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. This study not only sheds light on the cornucopia of influences shaping consumer behavior and preferences, but also rekindles the age-old debate on whether GMOs have truly altered the fabric of our social landscape. In conclusion, it seems that the kernels of truth about GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory" lie within a cobweb of intricate connections waiting to be unravelled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevailing hypothesis that GMOs hold the key to the universe was scrutinized in this study, which sought to explore the potential connection between the usage of genetically modified corn and the viewership of the popular television show "The Big Bang Theory". Utilizing USDA data on GMO corn production and viewership statistics from Wikipedia, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 2008 to 2019. Surprisingly, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 with a p-value less than 0.01 was uncovered, suggesting a remarkably strong association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and open the aperture for further investigation into the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. This study not only sheds light on the cornucopia of influences shaping consumer behavior and preferences, but also rekindles the age-old debate on whether GMOs have truly altered the fabric of our social landscape. In conclusion, it seems that the kernels of truth about GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory" lie within a cobweb of intricate connections waiting to be unravelled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and popular culture has long been a topic of speculation and intrigue. It is a cornundrum, if you will. As our society grapples with the impacts of GMOs on agriculture and food consumption, an unexpected contender vies for attention in the form of a television show that delves into the complexities of the universe. The synergistic interplay between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" presents an intriguing conundrum worthy of exploration. It's a confluence of seemingly incongruous domains: agriculture and entertainment, DNA and dialogue, kernels and laugh tracks.

The prevailing hypothesis, often whispered among the whispering ears of the academia, is that GMOs may hold the key to understanding not only the intricacies of our sustenance but also the subtleties of our cultural consumption. As the GMO corn fields sway in their genetically modified glory, is it possible that their impact extends far beyond dietary choices? Could these cornfields indeed hold sway over what captivates our minds on the small screen?

Our research team embarked on a quest, armed with a bushel of statistical analyses and a compass of curiosity, to investigate this seemingly idiosyncratic relationship. The allure of GMO corn and the gravitational pull of "The Big Bang Theory" posed a complex equation in and of themselves. Yet, as plucky researchers, we set out to unravel this cornundrum and potentially rock the foundations of scientific inquiry. After all, it's not every day that one gets to bewilder fellow scientists and farmers alike with the prospect of a connection between a crop and a sitcom.

The findings of our study not only point to a correlation between GMO corn usage and viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" but also raise intriguing implications. In this paper, we traverse the fields of genetically modified corn and the galaxies of television ratings, knitting together a narrative that will leave readers contemplating the synergies between agriculture and entertainment in a whole new light. So, let us embark on this journey of discovery, as we explore the maize of Big Bang - a journey that promises to fascinate, entertain, and perhaps even elicit a chuckle or two along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevailing hypothesis that GMOs hold the key to the universe was scrutinized in this study, which sought to explore the potential connection between the usage of genetically modified corn and the viewership of the popular television show "The Big Bang Theory". Utilizing USDA data on GMO corn production and viewership statistics from Wikipedia, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 2008 to 2019. Surprisingly, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 with a p-value less than 0.01 was uncovered, suggesting a remarkably strong association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and open the aperture for further investigation into the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. This study not only sheds light on the cornucopia of influences shaping consumer behavior and preferences, but also rekindles the age-old debate on whether GMOs have truly altered the fabric of our social landscape. In conclusion, it seems that the kernels of truth about GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory" lie within a cobweb of intricate connections waiting to be unravelled.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and popular culture has long been a topic of speculation and intrigue. It is a cornundrum, if you will. As our society grapples with the impacts of GMOs on agriculture and food consumption, an unexpected contender vies for attention in the form of a television show that delves into the complexities of the universe. The synergistic interplay between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" presents an intriguing conundrum worthy of exploration. It's a confluence of seemingly incongruous domains: agriculture and entertainment, DNA and dialogue, kernels and laugh tracks.
The prevailing hypothesis, often whispered among the whispering ears of the academia, is that GMOs may hold the key to understanding not only the intricacies of our sustenance but also the subtleties of our cultural consumption. As the GMO corn fields sway in their genetically modified glory, is it possible that their impact extends far beyond dietary choices? Could these cornfields indeed hold sway over what captivates our minds on the small screen?
Our research team embarked on a quest, armed with a bushel of statistical analyses and a compass of curiosity, to investigate this seemingly idiosyncratic relationship. The allure of GMO corn and the gravitational pull of "The Big Bang Theory" posed a complex equation in and of themselves. Yet, as plucky researchers, we set out to unravel this cornundrum and potentially rock the foundations of scientific inquiry. After all, it's not every day that one gets to bewilder fellow scientists and farmers alike with the prospect of a connection between a crop and a sitcom.
The findings of our study not only point to a correlation between GMO corn usage and viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" but also raise intriguing implications. In this paper, we traverse the fields of genetically modified corn and the galaxies of television ratings, knitting together a narrative that will leave readers contemplating the synergies between agriculture and entertainment in a whole new light. So, let us embark on this journey of discovery, as we explore the maize of Big Bang - a journey that promises to fascinate, entertain, and perhaps even elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between genetically modified corn and popular culture has long been a topic of both interest and skepticism. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO corn production and its impact on societal trends, highlighting the potential for unexpected connections between agricultural practices and consumer behavior. Their findings suggested a subtle influence of GMO usage on cultural phenomena, laying the groundwork for further exploration into this intriguing intersection.

In a similar vein, Doe (2018) delved into the cultural implications of agricultural advancements, emphasizing the need to consider the broader societal effects of GMO adoption. This line of inquiry unveiled the cornucopia of influences that shape consumer choices, raising thought-provoking questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains.

Moreover, Jones (2017) undertook a meticulous investigation of television viewership patterns, uncovering intricate nuances in audience preferences and trends. While their focus was not explicitly on agricultural factors, their work provided valuable insights into the dynamics of popular culture and the factors that influence viewers' choices.

Moving beyond academic studies, real-world implications and perspectives from popular non-fiction literature offer additional layers of insight. Books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens" by Paul John Scott raise critical questions about the impact of GMOs on our food supply and cultural landscape. These works serve as a poignant reminder of the far-reaching implications of agricultural practices on societal norms and behaviors.

On a more speculative note, examining fictional literature that intersects with the themes of agriculture and cultural influence, one cannot overlook the allegorical references in John Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath" and Margaret Atwood's dystopian masterpiece "Oryx and Crake." While not directly related to GMO corn or television viewership, these narratives poignantly capture the essence of societal change and the intertwining forces that shape human experience.

Furthermore, an analysis of social media discourse reveals intriguing observations that hint at a potential subconscious link between GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory." For instance, a tweet from @CornLover47 exclaims, "GMOs and 'The Big Bang Theory' are both out of this world! #CornOnTheCob #Bazinga." While seemingly lighthearted, such musings underscore the permeation of agricultural motifs and popular entertainment in the public consciousness.

These diverse sources collectively contribute to the tantalizing prospect of a deeper connection between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory." While the initial proposition may elicit a chuckle or two, the burgeoning evidence points to a complex interplay that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, beckoning researchers to delve further into this unexpected cornundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia . You used data from 2008 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevailing hypothesis that GMOs hold the key to the universe was scrutinized in this study, which sought to explore the potential connection between the usage of genetically modified corn and the viewership of the popular television show "The Big Bang Theory". Utilizing USDA data on GMO corn production and viewership statistics from Wikipedia, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 2008 to 2019. Surprisingly, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 with a p-value less than 0.01 was uncovered, suggesting a remarkably strong association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and open the aperture for further investigation into the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. This study not only sheds light on the cornucopia of influences shaping consumer behavior and preferences, but also rekindles the age-old debate on whether GMOs have truly altered the fabric of our social landscape. In conclusion, it seems that the kernels of truth about GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory" lie within a cobweb of intricate connections waiting to be unravelled.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and popular culture has long been a topic of speculation and intrigue. It is a cornundrum, if you will. As our society grapples with the impacts of GMOs on agriculture and food consumption, an unexpected contender vies for attention in the form of a television show that delves into the complexities of the universe. The synergistic interplay between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" presents an intriguing conundrum worthy of exploration. It's a confluence of seemingly incongruous domains: agriculture and entertainment, DNA and dialogue, kernels and laugh tracks.
The prevailing hypothesis, often whispered among the whispering ears of the academia, is that GMOs may hold the key to understanding not only the intricacies of our sustenance but also the subtleties of our cultural consumption. As the GMO corn fields sway in their genetically modified glory, is it possible that their impact extends far beyond dietary choices? Could these cornfields indeed hold sway over what captivates our minds on the small screen?
Our research team embarked on a quest, armed with a bushel of statistical analyses and a compass of curiosity, to investigate this seemingly idiosyncratic relationship. The allure of GMO corn and the gravitational pull of "The Big Bang Theory" posed a complex equation in and of themselves. Yet, as plucky researchers, we set out to unravel this cornundrum and potentially rock the foundations of scientific inquiry. After all, it's not every day that one gets to bewilder fellow scientists and farmers alike with the prospect of a connection between a crop and a sitcom.
The findings of our study not only point to a correlation between GMO corn usage and viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" but also raise intriguing implications. In this paper, we traverse the fields of genetically modified corn and the galaxies of television ratings, knitting together a narrative that will leave readers contemplating the synergies between agriculture and entertainment in a whole new light. So, let us embark on this journey of discovery, as we explore the maize of Big Bang - a journey that promises to fascinate, entertain, and perhaps even elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Oh, the trials and tribulations of crafting a methodology section - it's not exactly rocket science, but close enough. Our research team scoured the digital domains, navigating the virtual cornfields of information, armed with a bushel of research instruments and a fervent determination to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory."

Data Collection:
To procure the requisite data for our investigation, we turned to the vast expanses of the internet, where a wealth of information on GMO corn production and "The Big Bang Theory" awaited our eager harvest. We primarily utilized USDA databases to extract comprehensive data on GMO corn usage spanning from 2008 to 2019. As for viewership data, Wikipedia emerged as our trusted ally, providing detailed statistics on the number of viewers for each season of the show during the same time period. We acknowledge the limitations of using Wikipedia data, but we were comforted by the fact that its reliability could rival Sheldon Cooper's adherence to routine.

Data Analysis:
Armed with a prudent blend of statistical software and a sprinkling of scientific zeal, we embarked on the analysis phase. To explore the potential relationship between GMO corn usage and viewership of "The Big Bang Theory," we first calculated descriptive statistics to gain a preliminary understanding of the distributions and central tendencies of the variables. Then, like intrepid cosmic explorers charting unfamiliar territory, we performed correlation analysis to assess the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables. Ah, the dance of the data points, twirling around each other like celestial bodies in a statistical universe.

Statistical Models:
In our quest for empirical insights, we employed regression analysis to probe deeper into the potential influence of GMO corn usage on viewership of "The Big Bang Theory." This allowed us to disentangle the confounding factors and identify whether the observed association was robust or merely a statistical fluke. The models were constructed with the precision of a DNA helix, each coefficient and p-value scrutinized with the tenacity of a microbial geneticist. Oh, the sweet orchestration of statistical models - a symphony of numbers in pursuit of scientific truth.

Sensitivity Analysis:
An additional layer of scrutiny was applied to our findings through sensitivity analysis, where we assessed the stability of the results under various methodological assumptions. Like a finely-tuned instrument detecting the faintest of signals, we sought to ensure that our conclusions were not merely a mirage in the statistical desert.

Limitations:
Of course, no research endeavor is devoid of limitations. Our reliance on secondary data sources introduces the possibility of lurking variables and unmeasured confounders that could tiptoe into our analyses. However, armed with cautious skepticism and a healthy dose of scientific curiosity, we endeavored to navigate these treacherous statistical waters with all the resilience of a genetically modified corn stalk.

In conclusion, our methodology served as the cornerstone of our investigation, anchoring our exploration of the interplay between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory." Through a medley of data collection, analysis, and careful scrutiny, we embarked on this scientific voyage, guided by the North Star of empirical inquiry and the whimsical curiosity of a scientific mind.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2008 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9462438, r-squared of 0.8953773, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevailing hypothesis that GMOs hold the key to the universe was scrutinized in this study, which sought to explore the potential connection between the usage of genetically modified corn and the viewership of the popular television show "The Big Bang Theory". Utilizing USDA data on GMO corn production and viewership statistics from Wikipedia, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 2008 to 2019. Surprisingly, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 with a p-value less than 0.01 was uncovered, suggesting a remarkably strong association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and open the aperture for further investigation into the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. This study not only sheds light on the cornucopia of influences shaping consumer behavior and preferences, but also rekindles the age-old debate on whether GMOs have truly altered the fabric of our social landscape. In conclusion, it seems that the kernels of truth about GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory" lie within a cobweb of intricate connections waiting to be unravelled.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and popular culture has long been a topic of speculation and intrigue. It is a cornundrum, if you will. As our society grapples with the impacts of GMOs on agriculture and food consumption, an unexpected contender vies for attention in the form of a television show that delves into the complexities of the universe. The synergistic interplay between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" presents an intriguing conundrum worthy of exploration. It's a confluence of seemingly incongruous domains: agriculture and entertainment, DNA and dialogue, kernels and laugh tracks.
The prevailing hypothesis, often whispered among the whispering ears of the academia, is that GMOs may hold the key to understanding not only the intricacies of our sustenance but also the subtleties of our cultural consumption. As the GMO corn fields sway in their genetically modified glory, is it possible that their impact extends far beyond dietary choices? Could these cornfields indeed hold sway over what captivates our minds on the small screen?
Our research team embarked on a quest, armed with a bushel of statistical analyses and a compass of curiosity, to investigate this seemingly idiosyncratic relationship. The allure of GMO corn and the gravitational pull of "The Big Bang Theory" posed a complex equation in and of themselves. Yet, as plucky researchers, we set out to unravel this cornundrum and potentially rock the foundations of scientific inquiry. After all, it's not every day that one gets to bewilder fellow scientists and farmers alike with the prospect of a connection between a crop and a sitcom.
The findings of our study not only point to a correlation between GMO corn usage and viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" but also raise intriguing implications. In this paper, we traverse the fields of genetically modified corn and the galaxies of television ratings, knitting together a narrative that will leave readers contemplating the synergies between agriculture and entertainment in a whole new light. So, let us embark on this journey of discovery, as we explore the maize of Big Bang - a journey that promises to fascinate, entertain, and perhaps even elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our examination revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the usage of genetically modified corn (GMO) and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Over the time period from 2008 to 2019, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9462438, representing a colossal degree of association between these two seemingly unrelated entities. The r-squared value of 0.8953773 further underscored the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 89.54% of the variation in "The Big Bang Theory" viewership can be attributed to the usage of GMO corn.

Despite the initial skepticism surrounding the potential relationship between these variables, our findings unequivocally demonstrate a significant connection. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence of a strong statistical significance, affirming that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance.

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually captures the striking correlation between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". The data points align themselves in a manner so precise, it's almost as if Sheldon Cooper himself meticulously arranged them according to some obscure algorithm. It seems that as GMO corn production increased, so did the number of eyes fixed on the antics of Leonard, Sheldon, and the gang. A parallel increase, one could say!

In summary, our research project unearthed a correlation of cosmic proportions, shedding light on the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. Our findings not only provide empirical support for the connection between GMO corn and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the often starched environment of research inquiry. It appears that the seeds of insight have germinated, and the roots of this unexpected correlation run deep, intertwining the world of GMOs with the comedic cosmos of "The Big Bang Theory".


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevailing hypothesis that GMOs hold the key to the universe was scrutinized in this study, which sought to explore the potential connection between the usage of genetically modified corn and the viewership of the popular television show "The Big Bang Theory". Utilizing USDA data on GMO corn production and viewership statistics from Wikipedia, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 2008 to 2019. Surprisingly, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 with a p-value less than 0.01 was uncovered, suggesting a remarkably strong association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and open the aperture for further investigation into the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. This study not only sheds light on the cornucopia of influences shaping consumer behavior and preferences, but also rekindles the age-old debate on whether GMOs have truly altered the fabric of our social landscape. In conclusion, it seems that the kernels of truth about GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory" lie within a cobweb of intricate connections waiting to be unravelled.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between genetically modified corn and popular culture has long been a topic of both interest and skepticism. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO corn production and its impact on societal trends, highlighting the potential for unexpected connections between agricultural practices and consumer behavior. Their findings suggested a subtle influence of GMO usage on cultural phenomena, laying the groundwork for further exploration into this intriguing intersection.
In a similar vein, Doe (2018) delved into the cultural implications of agricultural advancements, emphasizing the need to consider the broader societal effects of GMO adoption. This line of inquiry unveiled the cornucopia of influences that shape consumer choices, raising thought-provoking questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains.
Moreover, Jones (2017) undertook a meticulous investigation of television viewership patterns, uncovering intricate nuances in audience preferences and trends. While their focus was not explicitly on agricultural factors, their work provided valuable insights into the dynamics of popular culture and the factors that influence viewers' choices.
Moving beyond academic studies, real-world implications and perspectives from popular non-fiction literature offer additional layers of insight. Books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens" by Paul John Scott raise critical questions about the impact of GMOs on our food supply and cultural landscape. These works serve as a poignant reminder of the far-reaching implications of agricultural practices on societal norms and behaviors.
On a more speculative note, examining fictional literature that intersects with the themes of agriculture and cultural influence, one cannot overlook the allegorical references in John Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath" and Margaret Atwood's dystopian masterpiece "Oryx and Crake." While not directly related to GMO corn or television viewership, these narratives poignantly capture the essence of societal change and the intertwining forces that shape human experience.
Furthermore, an analysis of social media discourse reveals intriguing observations that hint at a potential subconscious link between GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory." For instance, a tweet from @CornLover47 exclaims, "GMOs and 'The Big Bang Theory' are both out of this world! #CornOnTheCob #Bazinga." While seemingly lighthearted, such musings underscore the permeation of agricultural motifs and popular entertainment in the public consciousness.
These diverse sources collectively contribute to the tantalizing prospect of a deeper connection between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory." While the initial proposition may elicit a chuckle or two, the burgeoning evidence points to a complex interplay that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, beckoning researchers to delve further into this unexpected cornundrum.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our examination revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the usage of genetically modified corn (GMO) and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Over the time period from 2008 to 2019, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9462438, representing a colossal degree of association between these two seemingly unrelated entities. The r-squared value of 0.8953773 further underscored the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 89.54% of the variation in "The Big Bang Theory" viewership can be attributed to the usage of GMO corn.
Despite the initial skepticism surrounding the potential relationship between these variables, our findings unequivocally demonstrate a significant connection. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence of a strong statistical significance, affirming that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually captures the striking correlation between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". The data points align themselves in a manner so precise, it's almost as if Sheldon Cooper himself meticulously arranged them according to some obscure algorithm. It seems that as GMO corn production increased, so did the number of eyes fixed on the antics of Leonard, Sheldon, and the gang. A parallel increase, one could say!
In summary, our research project unearthed a correlation of cosmic proportions, shedding light on the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. Our findings not only provide empirical support for the connection between GMO corn and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the often starched environment of research inquiry. It appears that the seeds of insight have germinated, and the roots of this unexpected correlation run deep, intertwining the world of GMOs with the comedic cosmos of "The Big Bang Theory".

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study not only defy conventional expectations but also plant the seeds for further exploration into the interplay between genetically modified corn (GMO) and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory." Our results align with prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2018), who paved the way for investigating the subtle yet profound influence of agricultural practices on cultural phenomena. The robust correlation unearthed in our study supports the notion that GMO usage may indeed be intertwined with consumer behaviors, echoing the musings of @CornLover47 on social media who humorously linked "The Big Bang Theory" and GMOs.

The staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9462438, akin to Sheldon Cooper's obsession with precision, provides compelling evidence of a significant connection between GMO corn usage and the popularity of the show. Our research offers a kernel of truth amid the maze of statistical analysis, highlighting the surprising cosmic interplay between agricultural practices and entertainment preferences. The r-squared value of 0.8953773 further emphasizes the staggering impact of GMO usage on "The Big Bang Theory" viewership, demonstrating that approximately 89.54% of the variation in viewership can be attributed to GMO corn production. Our statistical analysis suggests that not only does GMO corn capture a significant share of the agricultural landscape, but it also appears to have a strong hold on television viewers' attention.

The visual depiction of the correlation through the scatterplot speaks volumes, painting a picture as precise as an algorithm designed by Sheldon himself. The alignment of data points mirrors the synchronized dances of particles in the cosmic ballet, underscoring the palpable relationship between GMO corn and the gravitational pull of "The Big Bang Theory." This unexpected correlation not only cements the influence of agricultural practices on popular culture but also delivers a punchline, injecting a healthy dose of humor into the often serious climate of research inquiry.

In conclusion, our study proposes that the maize of "The Big Bang Theory" may indeed be fertilized by the GMO cornucopia. This unexpected correlation uncovers the subtle influences that permeate the fabric of our cultural landscape, beckoning researchers to delve further into this cornundrum that intertwines the world of genetically modified corn with the comedic cosmos of "The Big Bang Theory." As we peel back the layers of this unanticipated relationship, we may unearth a cornucopia of insights that transcend the boundaries of traditional research disciplines.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevailing hypothesis that GMOs hold the key to the universe was scrutinized in this study, which sought to explore the potential connection between the usage of genetically modified corn and the viewership of the popular television show "The Big Bang Theory". Utilizing USDA data on GMO corn production and viewership statistics from Wikipedia, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 2008 to 2019. Surprisingly, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 with a p-value less than 0.01 was uncovered, suggesting a remarkably strong association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and open the aperture for further investigation into the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. This study not only sheds light on the cornucopia of influences shaping consumer behavior and preferences, but also rekindles the age-old debate on whether GMOs have truly altered the fabric of our social landscape. In conclusion, it seems that the kernels of truth about GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory" lie within a cobweb of intricate connections waiting to be unravelled.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and popular culture has long been a topic of speculation and intrigue. It is a cornundrum, if you will. As our society grapples with the impacts of GMOs on agriculture and food consumption, an unexpected contender vies for attention in the form of a television show that delves into the complexities of the universe. The synergistic interplay between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" presents an intriguing conundrum worthy of exploration. It's a confluence of seemingly incongruous domains: agriculture and entertainment, DNA and dialogue, kernels and laugh tracks.
The prevailing hypothesis, often whispered among the whispering ears of the academia, is that GMOs may hold the key to understanding not only the intricacies of our sustenance but also the subtleties of our cultural consumption. As the GMO corn fields sway in their genetically modified glory, is it possible that their impact extends far beyond dietary choices? Could these cornfields indeed hold sway over what captivates our minds on the small screen?
Our research team embarked on a quest, armed with a bushel of statistical analyses and a compass of curiosity, to investigate this seemingly idiosyncratic relationship. The allure of GMO corn and the gravitational pull of "The Big Bang Theory" posed a complex equation in and of themselves. Yet, as plucky researchers, we set out to unravel this cornundrum and potentially rock the foundations of scientific inquiry. After all, it's not every day that one gets to bewilder fellow scientists and farmers alike with the prospect of a connection between a crop and a sitcom.
The findings of our study not only point to a correlation between GMO corn usage and viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" but also raise intriguing implications. In this paper, we traverse the fields of genetically modified corn and the galaxies of television ratings, knitting together a narrative that will leave readers contemplating the synergies between agriculture and entertainment in a whole new light. So, let us embark on this journey of discovery, as we explore the maize of Big Bang - a journey that promises to fascinate, entertain, and perhaps even elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our examination revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the usage of genetically modified corn (GMO) and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". Over the time period from 2008 to 2019, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9462438, representing a colossal degree of association between these two seemingly unrelated entities. The r-squared value of 0.8953773 further underscored the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 89.54% of the variation in "The Big Bang Theory" viewership can be attributed to the usage of GMO corn.
Despite the initial skepticism surrounding the potential relationship between these variables, our findings unequivocally demonstrate a significant connection. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence of a strong statistical significance, affirming that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually captures the striking correlation between GMO corn usage and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". The data points align themselves in a manner so precise, it's almost as if Sheldon Cooper himself meticulously arranged them according to some obscure algorithm. It seems that as GMO corn production increased, so did the number of eyes fixed on the antics of Leonard, Sheldon, and the gang. A parallel increase, one could say!
In summary, our research project unearthed a correlation of cosmic proportions, shedding light on the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. Our findings not only provide empirical support for the connection between GMO corn and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the often starched environment of research inquiry. It appears that the seeds of insight have germinated, and the roots of this unexpected correlation run deep, intertwining the world of GMOs with the comedic cosmos of "The Big Bang Theory".

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has cracked open the cornucopia of possibilities, revealing a kernel of truth about the interplay between genetically modified corn and the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". The robust correlation uncovered between these seemingly unrelated entities has certainly raised some eyebrows, much like an unexpected punchline in a scientific debate. It is a-maize-ing to witness the unexpected bedfellows that statistics can unveil, showcasing the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and popular culture in a way that leaves one feeling like they've been hit by a statistical p-value truck.

As we close this chapter of our scientific endeavor, it's clear that further research in this field is unnecessary. After all, we've already corn-firmed the existence of this intriguing correlation, leaving little room for doubt. It's safe to say that we've ear-ned our stripes in this line of inquiry, and as much as we love the thrill of scientific exploration, it's time to pop the corn and savor the results of our corny correlation. Thank you for joining us on this peculiar journey of discovery, where the cosmos of GMO corn intersects with the whimsical world of "The Big Bang Theory". As the curtains close on this study, we bid adieu to the cornundra of possibilities and trust that this research has planted a few giggles and raised a few eyebrows along the way. No more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of The Big Bang Theory. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agri-Comedy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of The Big Bang Theory. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Applied Agricultural Astrology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Maize of Big Bang: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn Usage and Viewership of The Big Bang Theory with an abstract of The prevailing hypothesis that GMOs hold the key to the universe was scrutinized in this study, which sought to explore the potential connection between the usage of genetically modified corn and the viewership of the popular television show "The Big Bang Theory". Utilizing USDA data on GMO corn production and viewership statistics from Wikipedia, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning from 2008 to 2019. Surprisingly, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9462438 with a p-value less than 0.01 was uncovered, suggesting a remarkably strong association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and open the aperture for further investigation into the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. This study not only sheds light on the cornucopia of influences shaping consumer behavior and preferences, but also rekindles the age-old debate on whether GMOs have truly altered the fabric of our social landscape. In conclusion, it seems that the kernels of truth about GMO corn and "The Big Bang Theory" lie within a cobweb of intricate connections waiting to be unravelled.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, genetically modified corn, corn production, corn usage, GMO corn usage, The Big Bang Theory viewership, television viewership, USDA data, viewership statistics, popular culture, consumer behavior, agricultural practices, GMOs and popular culture, cultural influences, GMOs and social landscape

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in the United States that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn

Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"
Detailed data title: Average viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" by season
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

Correlation r = 0.9462438 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8953773 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory") is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn) over the 12 years from 2008 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.2E-6. 0.0000032290963644098120000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.00032% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 309,684 random variables You don't actually need 309 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
GMO use in corn (GMO corn %)808586888890939292929292
Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" (Viewers)83100000001000000000014140000000132100000001582000000018680000000199600000001905000000020360000000189900000001863000000017310000000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([80,85,86,88,88,90,93,92,92,92,92,92,])
array_2 = np.array([8310000000,10000000000,14140000000,13210000000,15820000000,18680000000,19960000000,19050000000,20360000000,18990000000,18630000000,17310000000,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn"
array_2_name = "Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory""

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1603 · Black Variable ID: 766 · Red Variable ID: 146
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0