about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,585 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the second variable is Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO cotton somehow led to a bouncier cotton, which was unknowingly used to make the championship squash balls, making them more lively and prone to creating longer rallies and extended matches.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a vintage black-and-white newspaper illustration that contrasts the serene setting of an Arkansas cotton field with the intense action of a World Open Squash Men's championship match. In the illustration, showcase tall genetically modified cotton plants swaying in the breeze under the radiant sun, juxtaposed with the dramatic image of two squash players engaged in an epic and intense five-set final match, volleying the ball back and forth. The illustration should capture the energy and contrast between the tranquil cotton field and the competitive squash championship. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image A black-and-white newspaper illustration High-tech Vaporwave Voxel art
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant Arkansas cotton field, tall genetically modified cotton plants sway in the breeze under the bright sun. Meanwhile, at the World Open Squash Men's championship, two players engage in an intense match, volleying back and forth as they play an epic five-set final.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant Arkansas cotton field, tall genetically modified cotton plants sway in the breeze under the bright sun. Meanwhile, at the World Open Squash Men's championship, two players engage in an intense match, volleying back and forth as they play an epic five-set final. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a vintage black-and-white newspaper illustration that contrasts the serene setting of an Arkansas cotton field with the intense action of a World Open Squash Men's championship match. In the illustration, showcase tall genetically modified cotton plants swaying in the breeze under the radiant sun, juxtaposed with the dramatic image of two squash players engaged in an epic and intense five-set final match, volleying the ball back and forth. The illustration should capture the energy and contrast between the tranquil cotton field and the competitive squash championship.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in Arkansas caused Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship

Journal of Genetically Modified Organism Athletics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. Our research team has embarked on an amusing yet analytically rigorous journey to unravel this peculiar bond. From the fields of Arkansas to the squash courts of world-class championships, we've endeavored to uncover the seeds of this unlikely relationship.

In our analysis, we employed USDA data on GMO cotton usage and Wikipedia records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 revealed a surprisingly strong statistical link between these seemingly disparate domains. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of squash championships, eliciting a reaction beyond what may have been cottoned on to before.

As we leaf through the data, one can't help but appreciate the humor of such a correlation, prompting us to ponder: Could it be that the cultivation of GMO cotton somehow exerts a gourd-like influence on the outcome of squash matches, or are we simply barking up the wrong tree? We invite our readers to join us in this lighthearted yet thought-provoking investigation, where dad jokes and statistical revelations collide in unexpected ways. Just as a good squash pun... is sure to produce a racket!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. Our research team has embarked on an amusing yet analytically rigorous journey to unravel this peculiar bond. From the fields of Arkansas to the squash courts of world-class championships, we've endeavored to uncover the seeds of this unlikely relationship.

In our analysis, we employed USDA data on GMO cotton usage and Wikipedia records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 revealed a surprisingly strong statistical link between these seemingly disparate domains. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of squash championships, eliciting a reaction beyond what may have been cottoned on to before.

As we leaf through the data, one can't help but appreciate the humor of such a correlation, prompting us to ponder: Could it be that the cultivation of GMO cotton somehow exerts a gourd-like influence on the outcome of squash matches, or are we simply barking up the wrong tree? We invite our readers to join us in this lighthearted yet thought-provoking investigation, where dad jokes and statistical revelations collide in unexpected ways. Just as a good squash pun... is sure to produce a racket!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in the thorny thickets of scientific inquiry, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as surprising as the one we present in this paper. The intersection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship has led us to a realization that even the most seasoned scientist would find un-be-leaf-able. It's a match that one might say is truly "seeding" the improbable links between agricultural practices and sports outcomes.

As we venture into this uncharted territory of bizarre correlations, we couldn't help but ponder the pun-derful conundrum we faced. Could it be that the genetic modifications in cotton have somehow gnarled the fate of squash championships, or is this just a cotton-pickin' coincidence? It's time to unravel this deeply rooted mystery and determine whether there's a grain of truth beneath the surface, or if we're simply spinning out of control.

GMO cotton isn't something you just pick up at the local farmer's market, and neither is the connection between its usage and the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final. We are diving deep into the quantitative sea, armed with our trusty correlation coefficient as our compass and our sense of humor as our life preserver. Let's weed out the noise and separate the cotton from the chaff to see if there's truly something to this peculiar tango of agriculture and athleticism.

But I digress, let's not lose sight of the a-maize-ing humor that often accompanies unexpected findings in research. It's not every day you stumble upon a pun-damental relationship between GMOs and squash. In a field where serious discourse prevails, we are unapologetically bringing a light-hearted touch to this investigation. After all, a good dad joke is like fine statistical analysis – it may elicit groans at first, but deep down, you can't deny its charm. Just as the squash court demands agility, our research requires nimble thinking and a willingness to entertain the possibility of the unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. Our research team has embarked on an amusing yet analytically rigorous journey to unravel this peculiar bond. From the fields of Arkansas to the squash courts of world-class championships, we've endeavored to uncover the seeds of this unlikely relationship.

In our analysis, we employed USDA data on GMO cotton usage and Wikipedia records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 revealed a surprisingly strong statistical link between these seemingly disparate domains. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of squash championships, eliciting a reaction beyond what may have been cottoned on to before.

As we leaf through the data, one can't help but appreciate the humor of such a correlation, prompting us to ponder: Could it be that the cultivation of GMO cotton somehow exerts a gourd-like influence on the outcome of squash matches, or are we simply barking up the wrong tree? We invite our readers to join us in this lighthearted yet thought-provoking investigation, where dad jokes and statistical revelations collide in unexpected ways. Just as a good squash pun... is sure to produce a racket!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in the thorny thickets of scientific inquiry, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as surprising as the one we present in this paper. The intersection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship has led us to a realization that even the most seasoned scientist would find un-be-leaf-able. It's a match that one might say is truly "seeding" the improbable links between agricultural practices and sports outcomes.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of bizarre correlations, we couldn't help but ponder the pun-derful conundrum we faced. Could it be that the genetic modifications in cotton have somehow gnarled the fate of squash championships, or is this just a cotton-pickin' coincidence? It's time to unravel this deeply rooted mystery and determine whether there's a grain of truth beneath the surface, or if we're simply spinning out of control.
GMO cotton isn't something you just pick up at the local farmer's market, and neither is the connection between its usage and the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final. We are diving deep into the quantitative sea, armed with our trusty correlation coefficient as our compass and our sense of humor as our life preserver. Let's weed out the noise and separate the cotton from the chaff to see if there's truly something to this peculiar tango of agriculture and athleticism.
But I digress, let's not lose sight of the a-maize-ing humor that often accompanies unexpected findings in research. It's not every day you stumble upon a pun-damental relationship between GMOs and squash. In a field where serious discourse prevails, we are unapologetically bringing a light-hearted touch to this investigation. After all, a good dad joke is like fine statistical analysis – it may elicit groans at first, but deep down, you can't deny its charm. Just as the squash court demands agility, our research requires nimble thinking and a willingness to entertain the possibility of the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith, Doe, and Jones (2019) examined the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in agriculture on various ecosystem dynamics, with a focus on cotton cultivation in the Southern United States. Their study highlighted the widespread adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and its implications for biodiversity, pest resistance, and crop yields. Little did they know that their work would eventually seed our interest in the unexpected correlation between GMO cotton and the World Open Squash Men's Championship. It's like they unintentionally volleyed the research over to us – they certainly didn't squash our curiosity!

In "The GMO Dilemma" by Martin (2015), the author navigates through the contentious debate surrounding the use of genetically modified crops and its socio-economic impacts. The book provides a compelling account of the policy implications and ethical considerations associated with GMO production. Little did Martin know that his work would indirectly serve as the fluff in our pillow fight against conventional wisdom, uncovering a connection between cotton modification and squash competition that nobody saw coming. It's almost as if the squash court beckoned us to serve up this unexpected discovery – talk about a smashing revelation!

Moving from non-fiction to fiction, in "The Cotton Chronicles" by Rowling (2007), readers are whisked away to a magical world where cotton plantations hold the key to an ancient prophecy. While this work may appear unrelated to our research at first glance, we can't help but draw parallels between the mystical allure of cotton and the enchanting grip it seems to have on the outcome of squash championships. It's almost as if our findings have woven themselves into the whimsical fabric of fiction, turning a seemingly mundane agricultural product into the centerpiece of a squash spectacle. It's like our research has charmed its way into an unexpected narrative twist – a true plot twist if you may!

Now, let's take a whimsical leap from literature to childhood cartoons. Who would have thought that "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "Rocket Power" would provide us with a moment of insight? The competitive spirit in "Rocket Power" and the underwater shenanigans of "SpongeBob SquarePants" surprisingly gave us a unique perspective on the relationship between GMO cotton and squash sets. It's almost as if these animated shows were nudging us to connect the dots and smash through the barriers of conventional thinking. We may have been diving into the depths of agricultural data, but it turns out we also found inspiration in the most unlikely of places – who lives in a pineapple under the sea? Apparently, the answer is a revelation about the intersection of GMOs and squash that we never knew we needed.

As we dissect the unlikely entanglement between GMO cotton usage in Arkansas and the World Open Squash Men's Championship, we can't help but maintain a light-hearted perspective. Just as a good squash pun is sure to produce a racket, we believe that humor and curiosity go hand in hand. So, join us in this amusing yet scientifically rigorous exploration – after all, it's not every day that a statistician and a comedian walk onto a squash court.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. Our research team has embarked on an amusing yet analytically rigorous journey to unravel this peculiar bond. From the fields of Arkansas to the squash courts of world-class championships, we've endeavored to uncover the seeds of this unlikely relationship.

In our analysis, we employed USDA data on GMO cotton usage and Wikipedia records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 revealed a surprisingly strong statistical link between these seemingly disparate domains. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of squash championships, eliciting a reaction beyond what may have been cottoned on to before.

As we leaf through the data, one can't help but appreciate the humor of such a correlation, prompting us to ponder: Could it be that the cultivation of GMO cotton somehow exerts a gourd-like influence on the outcome of squash matches, or are we simply barking up the wrong tree? We invite our readers to join us in this lighthearted yet thought-provoking investigation, where dad jokes and statistical revelations collide in unexpected ways. Just as a good squash pun... is sure to produce a racket!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in the thorny thickets of scientific inquiry, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as surprising as the one we present in this paper. The intersection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship has led us to a realization that even the most seasoned scientist would find un-be-leaf-able. It's a match that one might say is truly "seeding" the improbable links between agricultural practices and sports outcomes.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of bizarre correlations, we couldn't help but ponder the pun-derful conundrum we faced. Could it be that the genetic modifications in cotton have somehow gnarled the fate of squash championships, or is this just a cotton-pickin' coincidence? It's time to unravel this deeply rooted mystery and determine whether there's a grain of truth beneath the surface, or if we're simply spinning out of control.
GMO cotton isn't something you just pick up at the local farmer's market, and neither is the connection between its usage and the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final. We are diving deep into the quantitative sea, armed with our trusty correlation coefficient as our compass and our sense of humor as our life preserver. Let's weed out the noise and separate the cotton from the chaff to see if there's truly something to this peculiar tango of agriculture and athleticism.
But I digress, let's not lose sight of the a-maize-ing humor that often accompanies unexpected findings in research. It's not every day you stumble upon a pun-damental relationship between GMOs and squash. In a field where serious discourse prevails, we are unapologetically bringing a light-hearted touch to this investigation. After all, a good dad joke is like fine statistical analysis – it may elicit groans at first, but deep down, you can't deny its charm. Just as the squash court demands agility, our research requires nimble thinking and a willingness to entertain the possibility of the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the roots of the connection between GMO cotton usage in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship, our research team embraced an unconventional yet scientifically robust approach. We gathered data with the same zeal a farmer harvests crops, combining information from the USDA's database on GMO cotton production in Arkansas and Wikipedia's records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship, spanning the years 2000 to 2022. These sources were our bread and butter, or should I say, our squash and cotton, for this research. It's amazing what one can find on the world wide "web" these days!

Now, the statistical analysis was no walk in the park – quite the opposite, in fact. We first conducted a Pearson correlation coefficient analysis to explore the relationship between the use of GMO cotton in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the men's squash championship final. Our trusty statistical software churned through the numbers with diligence, much like a cotton gin separating fiber from seed. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and a p-value of less than 0.01, the results grew clearer, like a freshly picked boll of cotton. This statistical link was as unmissable as a bright white cotton bale against a field of green.

To further corroborate our findings, we employed a cross-sectional time series analysis, akin to untangling a particularly knotty vine. This method allowed us to look at the variation in GMO cotton usage and the sets played in the squash championship final over time, aiding our quest to comprehend the dynamism of this unexpected relationship. It's like spinning a yarn, only instead of wool, we're spinning a tale of GMO cotton and squash sets.

Moreover, we conducted a multivariate regression analysis to tease out the influence of potential confounding variables, much like picking out the grade-A cotton from the mixed fiber. Our model accounted for factors such as climatic conditions, average player age, and the presence of competitive rivalries. We wanted to ensure that our findings weren't just an artifact of other variables surreptitiously influencing the results. It's like ensuring the growth of GMO cotton isn't just a fluke, but a result of deliberate genetic modification.

Lastly, we utilized a time-series forecasting model to project the potential future impact of GMO cotton usage on the number of sets played in the squash championship final. It was like planting the seeds of our findings, hoping that with the right conditions, they'd grow into a robust and fruitful prediction. After all, forecasting the future is much like predicting the yield of a cotton crop – a blend of science, experience, and a dash of cosmic luck.

In summary, our methodology was a mix of traditional statistical analyses and innovative modeling approaches, culminating in a thorough exploration of a correlation that could have easily been brushed aside. We planted the seeds of inquiry, watered them with statistical rigor, and harvested the surprising linkage between GMO cotton and squash championship sets. It's amazing what you can find when you're willing to dive deep, armed with data and a good sense of humor. After all, in this line of research, a good pun is pure cotton for the soul... or should we say, the squashed soul!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7831713, r-squared of 0.6133573, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. Our research team has embarked on an amusing yet analytically rigorous journey to unravel this peculiar bond. From the fields of Arkansas to the squash courts of world-class championships, we've endeavored to uncover the seeds of this unlikely relationship.

In our analysis, we employed USDA data on GMO cotton usage and Wikipedia records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 revealed a surprisingly strong statistical link between these seemingly disparate domains. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of squash championships, eliciting a reaction beyond what may have been cottoned on to before.

As we leaf through the data, one can't help but appreciate the humor of such a correlation, prompting us to ponder: Could it be that the cultivation of GMO cotton somehow exerts a gourd-like influence on the outcome of squash matches, or are we simply barking up the wrong tree? We invite our readers to join us in this lighthearted yet thought-provoking investigation, where dad jokes and statistical revelations collide in unexpected ways. Just as a good squash pun... is sure to produce a racket!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in the thorny thickets of scientific inquiry, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as surprising as the one we present in this paper. The intersection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship has led us to a realization that even the most seasoned scientist would find un-be-leaf-able. It's a match that one might say is truly "seeding" the improbable links between agricultural practices and sports outcomes.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of bizarre correlations, we couldn't help but ponder the pun-derful conundrum we faced. Could it be that the genetic modifications in cotton have somehow gnarled the fate of squash championships, or is this just a cotton-pickin' coincidence? It's time to unravel this deeply rooted mystery and determine whether there's a grain of truth beneath the surface, or if we're simply spinning out of control.
GMO cotton isn't something you just pick up at the local farmer's market, and neither is the connection between its usage and the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final. We are diving deep into the quantitative sea, armed with our trusty correlation coefficient as our compass and our sense of humor as our life preserver. Let's weed out the noise and separate the cotton from the chaff to see if there's truly something to this peculiar tango of agriculture and athleticism.
But I digress, let's not lose sight of the a-maize-ing humor that often accompanies unexpected findings in research. It's not every day you stumble upon a pun-damental relationship between GMOs and squash. In a field where serious discourse prevails, we are unapologetically bringing a light-hearted touch to this investigation. After all, a good dad joke is like fine statistical analysis – it may elicit groans at first, but deep down, you can't deny its charm. Just as the squash court demands agility, our research requires nimble thinking and a willingness to entertain the possibility of the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. The correlation coefficient, coming in at 0.7831713, left us feeling genetically-moved by the strength of this unexpected relationship. It's quite a seedling to realize that the humble cotton plant could be a contender in the world of squash championships. One might say it's a real match made in heaven, or perhaps a lab-made match in a Petri dish.

The r-squared value of 0.6133573 further solidified the statistical significance of this correlation, indicating that a whopping 61.33573% of the variability in the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final can be explained by the usage of GMO cotton in Arkansas. We couldn't help but marvel at the power of statistical analysis – squashing doubts and fears with a racquet of clarity and precision.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence for this correlation is as clear as the lines on a squash court. The probability of this relationship occurring by chance alone is lower than finding a needle in a haystack. Or perhaps in this case, it's more akin to finding a genetically unmodified cotton plant thriving in a field of GMOs – highly improbable!

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong linear relationship between the two variables. The data points are as tightly woven as the threads of GMO cotton, demonstrating a clear trend that is anything but frayed. The correlation leaps out of the chart like a squash player lunging for a shot, leaving us to wonder if some invisible force is at play, tugging at the strings of both cotton farming and squash championships.

In conclusion, our findings unveil a surprising connection between GMO cotton usage in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. This unexpected correlation has opened the door to a new realm of inquiry, leaving us with a-maize-ing questions. Could it be that genetically modified cotton is serving as a silent coach to squash players, guiding them to battle it out in extra sets? Or is it simply a curious case of statistical serendipity? Regardless, we've learned that when it comes to research, expect the unexpected - just like a squash ball bouncing off the wall in an unpredictable trajectory.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. Our research team has embarked on an amusing yet analytically rigorous journey to unravel this peculiar bond. From the fields of Arkansas to the squash courts of world-class championships, we've endeavored to uncover the seeds of this unlikely relationship.

In our analysis, we employed USDA data on GMO cotton usage and Wikipedia records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 revealed a surprisingly strong statistical link between these seemingly disparate domains. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of squash championships, eliciting a reaction beyond what may have been cottoned on to before.

As we leaf through the data, one can't help but appreciate the humor of such a correlation, prompting us to ponder: Could it be that the cultivation of GMO cotton somehow exerts a gourd-like influence on the outcome of squash matches, or are we simply barking up the wrong tree? We invite our readers to join us in this lighthearted yet thought-provoking investigation, where dad jokes and statistical revelations collide in unexpected ways. Just as a good squash pun... is sure to produce a racket!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith, Doe, and Jones (2019) examined the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in agriculture on various ecosystem dynamics, with a focus on cotton cultivation in the Southern United States. Their study highlighted the widespread adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and its implications for biodiversity, pest resistance, and crop yields. Little did they know that their work would eventually seed our interest in the unexpected correlation between GMO cotton and the World Open Squash Men's Championship. It's like they unintentionally volleyed the research over to us – they certainly didn't squash our curiosity!
In "The GMO Dilemma" by Martin (2015), the author navigates through the contentious debate surrounding the use of genetically modified crops and its socio-economic impacts. The book provides a compelling account of the policy implications and ethical considerations associated with GMO production. Little did Martin know that his work would indirectly serve as the fluff in our pillow fight against conventional wisdom, uncovering a connection between cotton modification and squash competition that nobody saw coming. It's almost as if the squash court beckoned us to serve up this unexpected discovery – talk about a smashing revelation!
Moving from non-fiction to fiction, in "The Cotton Chronicles" by Rowling (2007), readers are whisked away to a magical world where cotton plantations hold the key to an ancient prophecy. While this work may appear unrelated to our research at first glance, we can't help but draw parallels between the mystical allure of cotton and the enchanting grip it seems to have on the outcome of squash championships. It's almost as if our findings have woven themselves into the whimsical fabric of fiction, turning a seemingly mundane agricultural product into the centerpiece of a squash spectacle. It's like our research has charmed its way into an unexpected narrative twist – a true plot twist if you may!
Now, let's take a whimsical leap from literature to childhood cartoons. Who would have thought that "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "Rocket Power" would provide us with a moment of insight? The competitive spirit in "Rocket Power" and the underwater shenanigans of "SpongeBob SquarePants" surprisingly gave us a unique perspective on the relationship between GMO cotton and squash sets. It's almost as if these animated shows were nudging us to connect the dots and smash through the barriers of conventional thinking. We may have been diving into the depths of agricultural data, but it turns out we also found inspiration in the most unlikely of places – who lives in a pineapple under the sea? Apparently, the answer is a revelation about the intersection of GMOs and squash that we never knew we needed.
As we dissect the unlikely entanglement between GMO cotton usage in Arkansas and the World Open Squash Men's Championship, we can't help but maintain a light-hearted perspective. Just as a good squash pun is sure to produce a racket, we believe that humor and curiosity go hand in hand. So, join us in this amusing yet scientifically rigorous exploration – after all, it's not every day that a statistician and a comedian walk onto a squash court.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. The correlation coefficient, coming in at 0.7831713, left us feeling genetically-moved by the strength of this unexpected relationship. It's quite a seedling to realize that the humble cotton plant could be a contender in the world of squash championships. One might say it's a real match made in heaven, or perhaps a lab-made match in a Petri dish.
The r-squared value of 0.6133573 further solidified the statistical significance of this correlation, indicating that a whopping 61.33573% of the variability in the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final can be explained by the usage of GMO cotton in Arkansas. We couldn't help but marvel at the power of statistical analysis – squashing doubts and fears with a racquet of clarity and precision.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence for this correlation is as clear as the lines on a squash court. The probability of this relationship occurring by chance alone is lower than finding a needle in a haystack. Or perhaps in this case, it's more akin to finding a genetically unmodified cotton plant thriving in a field of GMOs – highly improbable!
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong linear relationship between the two variables. The data points are as tightly woven as the threads of GMO cotton, demonstrating a clear trend that is anything but frayed. The correlation leaps out of the chart like a squash player lunging for a shot, leaving us to wonder if some invisible force is at play, tugging at the strings of both cotton farming and squash championships.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a surprising connection between GMO cotton usage in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. This unexpected correlation has opened the door to a new realm of inquiry, leaving us with a-maize-ing questions. Could it be that genetically modified cotton is serving as a silent coach to squash players, guiding them to battle it out in extra sets? Or is it simply a curious case of statistical serendipity? Regardless, we've learned that when it comes to research, expect the unexpected - just like a squash ball bouncing off the wall in an unpredictable trajectory.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has pruned its way through the fields of agriculture and the courts of squash, discovering a connection that is as surprising as a squash ball rebounding unpredictably off the court wall. The statistically significant correlation we unveiled between GMO cotton usage in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship has left us feeling as giddy as a squash player who just aced a difficult serve. It appears that the roots of this unexpected relationship run deeper than we initially thought. Who knew that GMOs and squash could make such a fine plant-ing ground for statistical inquiry?

Our findings stand firmly behind previous research, such as the work of Smith, Doe, and Jones (2019), who inadvertently served the topic to us on a silver platter akin to a squash championship trophy. As they parsed through the implications of GMO cotton in agriculture, little did they know that they were sowing the seeds of curiosity that we have now harvested. It's almost as if their work was the perfect match for our investigation, like a prime-time showdown in the squash court where the best genetics clashed.

Similarly, Martin's (2015) exploration of the ethically charged terrain of genetically modified crops has sown a different kind of seed in our research, germinating unexpected connections between GMO cotton and the world of squash competition. It seems that ethical debates and squash matches may have more in common than one might initially think. It's as though the GMO cotton issue presented to us in Martin's work has blossomed into a full-fledged championship match, with GMOs lurking as the silent spectators in the crowd.

Such serendipitous links also extend to less conventional sources, such as J.K. Rowling's "The Cotton Chronicles." While a work of fiction, Rowling's narrative has seemingly woven itself into the fabric of our findings, inspiring thoughts on the magical grip of cotton that has extended to the realm of squash. It's like she cast a spell to ensure that our research findings would unravel a story as captivating as her own magical yarns. In the same vein, the unexpected influence of childhood cartoons "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "Rocket Power" has nudged us to dive deeper and smash through the barriers of traditional scientific thinking. Who knew that a pineapple under the sea and a group of young thrill-seekers would serve as the unlikely cheerleaders in our squash and GMO cotton discovery?

In conclusion, our results have left us with more questions than answers, much like the suspense of a final squash set tied at match point. We must now pivot our attention to deciphering the underlying mechanisms driving this quirky correlation. Does GMO cotton hold the racquet strings to the fate of squash championships, or are we simply volleying theories back and forth? Whatever the case may be, our study has successfully illuminated an unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and sports competitions, akin to a tightly woven rally on the squash court that keeps the audience in sheer anticipation. It's as if we've uncovered a new kind of match point in the intriguing game of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. Our research team has embarked on an amusing yet analytically rigorous journey to unravel this peculiar bond. From the fields of Arkansas to the squash courts of world-class championships, we've endeavored to uncover the seeds of this unlikely relationship.

In our analysis, we employed USDA data on GMO cotton usage and Wikipedia records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 revealed a surprisingly strong statistical link between these seemingly disparate domains. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of squash championships, eliciting a reaction beyond what may have been cottoned on to before.

As we leaf through the data, one can't help but appreciate the humor of such a correlation, prompting us to ponder: Could it be that the cultivation of GMO cotton somehow exerts a gourd-like influence on the outcome of squash matches, or are we simply barking up the wrong tree? We invite our readers to join us in this lighthearted yet thought-provoking investigation, where dad jokes and statistical revelations collide in unexpected ways. Just as a good squash pun... is sure to produce a racket!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in the thorny thickets of scientific inquiry, but rarely do we stumble upon a correlation as surprising as the one we present in this paper. The intersection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship has led us to a realization that even the most seasoned scientist would find un-be-leaf-able. It's a match that one might say is truly "seeding" the improbable links between agricultural practices and sports outcomes.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of bizarre correlations, we couldn't help but ponder the pun-derful conundrum we faced. Could it be that the genetic modifications in cotton have somehow gnarled the fate of squash championships, or is this just a cotton-pickin' coincidence? It's time to unravel this deeply rooted mystery and determine whether there's a grain of truth beneath the surface, or if we're simply spinning out of control.
GMO cotton isn't something you just pick up at the local farmer's market, and neither is the connection between its usage and the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final. We are diving deep into the quantitative sea, armed with our trusty correlation coefficient as our compass and our sense of humor as our life preserver. Let's weed out the noise and separate the cotton from the chaff to see if there's truly something to this peculiar tango of agriculture and athleticism.
But I digress, let's not lose sight of the a-maize-ing humor that often accompanies unexpected findings in research. It's not every day you stumble upon a pun-damental relationship between GMOs and squash. In a field where serious discourse prevails, we are unapologetically bringing a light-hearted touch to this investigation. After all, a good dad joke is like fine statistical analysis – it may elicit groans at first, but deep down, you can't deny its charm. Just as the squash court demands agility, our research requires nimble thinking and a willingness to entertain the possibility of the unexpected.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. The correlation coefficient, coming in at 0.7831713, left us feeling genetically-moved by the strength of this unexpected relationship. It's quite a seedling to realize that the humble cotton plant could be a contender in the world of squash championships. One might say it's a real match made in heaven, or perhaps a lab-made match in a Petri dish.
The r-squared value of 0.6133573 further solidified the statistical significance of this correlation, indicating that a whopping 61.33573% of the variability in the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final can be explained by the usage of GMO cotton in Arkansas. We couldn't help but marvel at the power of statistical analysis – squashing doubts and fears with a racquet of clarity and precision.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence for this correlation is as clear as the lines on a squash court. The probability of this relationship occurring by chance alone is lower than finding a needle in a haystack. Or perhaps in this case, it's more akin to finding a genetically unmodified cotton plant thriving in a field of GMOs – highly improbable!
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong linear relationship between the two variables. The data points are as tightly woven as the threads of GMO cotton, demonstrating a clear trend that is anything but frayed. The correlation leaps out of the chart like a squash player lunging for a shot, leaving us to wonder if some invisible force is at play, tugging at the strings of both cotton farming and squash championships.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a surprising connection between GMO cotton usage in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. This unexpected correlation has opened the door to a new realm of inquiry, leaving us with a-maize-ing questions. Could it be that genetically modified cotton is serving as a silent coach to squash players, guiding them to battle it out in extra sets? Or is it simply a curious case of statistical serendipity? Regardless, we've learned that when it comes to research, expect the unexpected - just like a squash ball bouncing off the wall in an unpredictable trajectory.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the game of research, we've aced a surprising match point as we unraveled the unexpected link between GMO cotton usage in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the World Open Squash Men's Championship final. Our findings have left a "seed" of curiosity - perhaps genetically modified squash seeds, if you will - in the fertile soil of scientific inquiry. It's like discovering a hidden serve in the game; you never know which way the ball's going to spin!

Our data shows a strong statistical correlation, boasting a correlation coefficient that would leave even the most seasoned botanist green with envy. As we delved into this unlikely connection, we couldn't help but marvel at the natural synergy between the fields and the courts. It seems that genetically modifying cotton has indeed "squashed" any doubts about its impact on the world of squash.

With an r-squared value that's higher than the Tower of Pisa, our statistical analysis has firmly planted the flag of significance in this uncharted territory. It's a bit like using a weed killer to clear out the noise and reveal the sprouting truth. Our research has truly "grown" on us, much like a hearty vine climbing up a trellis.

As we reflect on our findings, we can't help but crack a dad joke or two. Who knew that GMO cotton could be the unsung hero of squash matches - providing a rallying cry for players to "seed" their determination and ace their opponents! It's a bit like discovering a genetic modification that gives players an extra bounce in their step, both on and off the court.

In closing, our study has germinated a fascinating avenue of investigation, but as far as further research goes, we might say it's time to let this particular pumpkin rest in the patch. It seems that our findings have fully blossomed, and we're convinced there's no need for additional cultivation in this domain. After all, even in the world of research, sometimes you just have to call it a match point and serve up the dad jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Genetically Modified Organism Athletics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Sustainable Agriculture Research Consortium


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spinning into Play: The GMO Cotton Link to Squashing Sets in World Championship with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in cotton farming in Arkansas and the number of sets played in the final of the World Open Squash Men's Championship. Our research team has embarked on an amusing yet analytically rigorous journey to unravel this peculiar bond. From the fields of Arkansas to the squash courts of world-class championships, we've endeavored to uncover the seeds of this unlikely relationship.
In our analysis, we employed USDA data on GMO cotton usage and Wikipedia records of the number of sets played in the final matches of the World Open Squash Men's Championship from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7831713 and p < 0.01 revealed a surprisingly strong statistical link between these seemingly disparate domains. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton have woven themselves into the fabric of squash championships, eliciting a reaction beyond what may have been cottoned on to before.
As we leaf through the data, one can't help but appreciate the humor of such a correlation, prompting us to ponder: Could it be that the cultivation of GMO cotton somehow exerts a gourd-like influence on the outcome of squash matches, or are we simply barking up the wrong tree? We invite our readers to join us in this lighthearted yet thought-provoking investigation, where dad jokes and statistical revelations collide in unexpected ways. Just as a good squash pun... is sure to produce a racket!

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, cotton farming, Arkansas, World Open Squash Men's Championship, sets played, correlation analysis, USDA data, Wikipedia records, statistical link, GMO influence, squash matches, humor in correlation, statistical analysis, unexpected relationships

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Arkansas genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Arkansas

Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship
Detailed data title: Number of sets played in final of World Open (Squash) Men's championship
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship

Correlation r = 0.7831713 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6133573 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 61.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Arkansas) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.9E-6. 0.0000099384818786356970000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.00099% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 100,619 random variables You don't actually need 100 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Arkansas (GMO cotton %)7078909594969495989798989998999999999999999999
Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship (Sets)00545353434455534544445




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([70,78,90,95,94,96,94,95,98,97,98,98,99,98,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,99,])
array_2 = np.array([0,0,5,4,5,3,5,3,4,3,4,4,5,5,5,3,4,5,4,4,4,4,5,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Number of sets played in final of World Open Squash Men's championship"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 1585 · Black Variable ID: 803 · Red Variable ID: 277
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0