about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,580 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Biomass power generated in Turkiye and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Porsche.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The extra energy was revving up more than just the cars!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cutsy art illustration ] Create an image of a charming workshop set in Turkiye, where a group of endearing engineers is working diligently to convert biomass into power using futuristic technology. In the background, capture the scene of a sleek Porsche sports car being carefully inspected by technicians as it undergoes a recall. Ensure the depiction is simple yet visually engaging, encompassing the workshop's warm atmosphere while showcasing the juxtaposition of advanced engineering and automotive care. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism Cubism Scalar art Symbolism Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a workshop in Turkiye, a group of engineers are busy converting biomass into power using advanced technology. In the background, a sleek Porsche sports car is being returned for a recall, with technicians inspecting the vehicle carefully.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a workshop in Turkiye, a group of engineers are busy converting biomass into power using advanced technology. In the background, a sleek Porsche sports car is being returned for a recall, with technicians inspecting the vehicle carefully. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cutsy art illustration ] Create an image of a charming workshop set in Turkiye, where a group of endearing engineers is working diligently to convert biomass into power using futuristic technology. In the background, capture the scene of a sleek Porsche sports car being carefully inspected by technicians as it undergoes a recall. Ensure the depiction is simple yet visually engaging, encompassing the workshop's warm atmosphere while showcasing the juxtaposition of advanced engineering and automotive care.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Biomass power generated in Turkiye caused Automotive recalls issued by Porsche to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme

The International Journal of Eclectic Bioengineering

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an ambitious exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of biomass power in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. In the realms of statistical correlation, we delve deep into the numbers, hoping to unearth an unlikely connection. Drawing from data provided by the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 dating back from 1980 to 2021. Our research takes a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, utilizing puns and playful observations to break the ice and shed light on this unexpected relationship. Join us on a whimsical journey through statistical analysis and automobile mishaps as we unravel the mystery behind Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an ambitious exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of biomass power in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. In the realms of statistical correlation, we delve deep into the numbers, hoping to unearth an unlikely connection. Drawing from data provided by the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 dating back from 1980 to 2021. Our research takes a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, utilizing puns and playful observations to break the ice and shed light on this unexpected relationship. Join us on a whimsical journey through statistical analysis and automobile mishaps as we unravel the mystery behind Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Biomass power and automotive recalls may seem as likely to go together as oil and water, but in the world of research, unexpected associations can drive groundbreaking discoveries. Much like the conundrum of why the chicken crossed the road, we find ourselves contemplating the unlikely link between Türkiye's biomass power generation and the automotive recalls issued by the illustrious Porsche. As we embark on this academic escapade, we aim to unravel the tangled web of data and unveil the surprising statistical connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.

In the realm of statistical inquiry, we often encounter enigmatic and sometimes bewildering relationships among variables, much like unraveling the plot of a good mystery novel. While some correlations are as obvious as finding a needle in a haystack, others hide in plain sight, waiting for the discerning eye to uncover their secrets. In the case of biomass power in Türkiye and Porsche recalls, we find ourselves on a quest akin to deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle – a delightful challenge for the adventurous statistician.

As we peer through the magnifying glass of statistical analysis, we endeavor to maintain an air of levity and playfulness, much like a detective donning a whimsical hat to add a touch of mirth to the investigation. Our approach embraces the inherent unpredictability and, at times, absurdity of scientific inquiry, allowing for moments of humor and amusement amidst the rigors of data analysis. After all, what good is research without a sprinkling of puns, a dash of wit, and the occasional unexpected twist to keep us on our toes?

In this paper, we aim to showcase the surprising camaraderie between Türkiye's biomass boffins and Porsche's recall conundrums, employing statistical methods that will leave no stone unturned and no outlier unexamined. So, fasten your seatbelts, and let's rev up our engines as we embark on a journey through numbers, correlations, and the delightful unpredictability of research – all in pursuit of uncovering the Porsche recall rhyme in Türkiye's biomass bonanza.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an ambitious exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of biomass power in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. In the realms of statistical correlation, we delve deep into the numbers, hoping to unearth an unlikely connection. Drawing from data provided by the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 dating back from 1980 to 2021. Our research takes a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, utilizing puns and playful observations to break the ice and shed light on this unexpected relationship. Join us on a whimsical journey through statistical analysis and automobile mishaps as we unravel the mystery behind Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Biomass power and automotive recalls may seem as likely to go together as oil and water, but in the world of research, unexpected associations can drive groundbreaking discoveries. Much like the conundrum of why the chicken crossed the road, we find ourselves contemplating the unlikely link between Türkiye's biomass power generation and the automotive recalls issued by the illustrious Porsche. As we embark on this academic escapade, we aim to unravel the tangled web of data and unveil the surprising statistical connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
In the realm of statistical inquiry, we often encounter enigmatic and sometimes bewildering relationships among variables, much like unraveling the plot of a good mystery novel. While some correlations are as obvious as finding a needle in a haystack, others hide in plain sight, waiting for the discerning eye to uncover their secrets. In the case of biomass power in Türkiye and Porsche recalls, we find ourselves on a quest akin to deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle – a delightful challenge for the adventurous statistician.
As we peer through the magnifying glass of statistical analysis, we endeavor to maintain an air of levity and playfulness, much like a detective donning a whimsical hat to add a touch of mirth to the investigation. Our approach embraces the inherent unpredictability and, at times, absurdity of scientific inquiry, allowing for moments of humor and amusement amidst the rigors of data analysis. After all, what good is research without a sprinkling of puns, a dash of wit, and the occasional unexpected twist to keep us on our toes?
In this paper, we aim to showcase the surprising camaraderie between Türkiye's biomass boffins and Porsche's recall conundrums, employing statistical methods that will leave no stone unturned and no outlier unexamined. So, fasten your seatbelts, and let's rev up our engines as we embark on a journey through numbers, correlations, and the delightful unpredictability of research – all in pursuit of uncovering the Porsche recall rhyme in Türkiye's biomass bonanza.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find that the connection between biomass power generation in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche has sparked both curiosity and skepticism within the academic community. Smith and Doe (2015) delve into the intricacies of biomass power in Türkiye, painting a comprehensive picture of the industry's growth and its economic implications, while Jones (2017) scrutinizes the historical trends of automotive recalls, establishing a framework for understanding the complexities of automobile safety and quality control. However, as we move beyond these conventional sources, the literature takes a whimsical turn toward unexpected realms.

In "The Biomass Revolution: Powering the Future," Lorem and Ipsum (2020) provide a compelling narrative of Türkiye's biomass power evolution, a tale replete with twists and turns much like a thrilling mystery novel. On the other hand, "Recall Roulette: A Chronicle of Automotive Anomalies" by Ipsum and Lorem (2018) offers a colorful account of Porsche's recall escapades, capturing the capricious nature of automotive mishaps with a humorous flair.

Taking a detour into fictional literature, "The Biofuel Mysteries" by Jane A. Smith (2019) weaves a perplexing narrative of intrigue and suspense set within Türkiye's biomass power sector, invoking the spirit of an enigmatic Agatha Christie novel. Meanwhile, "Porsche Problems: A Tale of Recalls and Resilience" by John C. Doe (2016) regales readers with a fictionalized account of the tumultuous world of automotive recalls through the lens of a gripping detective thriller.

Our whimsical exploration doesn't stop there. As we venture into the world of children's entertainment, the animated series "Biomass Bonanza" and "Porsche Perils" offer a lighthearted yet surprisingly insightful take on biomass power and automotive mishaps. These delightful shows encourage viewers to embrace the playful side of research, highlighting the unexpected connections that often lay hidden beneath the surface.

In our quest to unearth the correlation between Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls, we are unearthing a treasure trove of unexpected literary and cultural references, reminding us that research can both be intellectually stimulating and delightfully entertaining. As we continue our journey, we anticipate even more surprising revelations and, perhaps, a joke or two along the way. After all, what's research without a touch of whimsy?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an ambitious exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of biomass power in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. In the realms of statistical correlation, we delve deep into the numbers, hoping to unearth an unlikely connection. Drawing from data provided by the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 dating back from 1980 to 2021. Our research takes a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, utilizing puns and playful observations to break the ice and shed light on this unexpected relationship. Join us on a whimsical journey through statistical analysis and automobile mishaps as we unravel the mystery behind Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Biomass power and automotive recalls may seem as likely to go together as oil and water, but in the world of research, unexpected associations can drive groundbreaking discoveries. Much like the conundrum of why the chicken crossed the road, we find ourselves contemplating the unlikely link between Türkiye's biomass power generation and the automotive recalls issued by the illustrious Porsche. As we embark on this academic escapade, we aim to unravel the tangled web of data and unveil the surprising statistical connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
In the realm of statistical inquiry, we often encounter enigmatic and sometimes bewildering relationships among variables, much like unraveling the plot of a good mystery novel. While some correlations are as obvious as finding a needle in a haystack, others hide in plain sight, waiting for the discerning eye to uncover their secrets. In the case of biomass power in Türkiye and Porsche recalls, we find ourselves on a quest akin to deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle – a delightful challenge for the adventurous statistician.
As we peer through the magnifying glass of statistical analysis, we endeavor to maintain an air of levity and playfulness, much like a detective donning a whimsical hat to add a touch of mirth to the investigation. Our approach embraces the inherent unpredictability and, at times, absurdity of scientific inquiry, allowing for moments of humor and amusement amidst the rigors of data analysis. After all, what good is research without a sprinkling of puns, a dash of wit, and the occasional unexpected twist to keep us on our toes?
In this paper, we aim to showcase the surprising camaraderie between Türkiye's biomass boffins and Porsche's recall conundrums, employing statistical methods that will leave no stone unturned and no outlier unexamined. So, fasten your seatbelts, and let's rev up our engines as we embark on a journey through numbers, correlations, and the delightful unpredictability of research – all in pursuit of uncovering the Porsche recall rhyme in Türkiye's biomass bonanza.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious connection between Türkiye's biomass power generation and the automotive recalls haunting Porsche, our research team embarked on a statistical escapade that blended meticulous data analysis with a sprinkling of whimsy. Our data collection journey took us through the virtual highways of the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, where we gathered a treasure trove of information spanning from 1980 to 2021. After triumphantly wrangling the data into submission, we buckled up for a wild ride through the corridors of statistical analysis, armed with a trusty calculator and a penchant for puns.

Our first order of business was to engage in a dance with the numbers, performing a multivariate regression analysis to tease out any potential associations between Türkiye's biomass power generation and the frequency of Porsche recalls. With the grace of a ballet dancer and the precision of a conductor leading a symphony, we meticulously examined the statistical relationships while maintaining an air of lighthearted curiosity, much like a detective examining clues with a Sherlockian flair.

In addition to our statistical pas de deux, we utilized advanced time series analysis techniques to unravel the temporal dynamics of biomorphic power and Porsche recalls. Armed with our metaphorical time-traveling machine, also known as sophisticated statistical software, we ventured into the vast expanse of temporal data, channeling our inner time lords to uncover any intriguing patterns and trends that may have eluded the naked eye. Much like Doctor Who navigating the eccentricities of time and space, we navigated the twists and turns of temporal data with equal parts earnestness and levity, occasionally pausing to appreciate the absurd beauty of statistical anomalies.

As we delved deeper into the realms of statistical inquiry, we also explored the concept of Granger causality to discern the potential directional influence between biomorphic power generation in Türkiye and the issuance of Porsche recalls. With the finesse of a magician performing sleight of hand and the skepticism of a seasoned sleuth, we probed the data for any hints of causality, all the while maintaining a sense of scholarly merriment in the spirit of scientific discovery.

Throughout our methodological odyssey, we remained vigilant in our pursuit of statistical rigor, meticulously conducting robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure the reliability and validity of our findings. We scrutinized our data with the discerning eye of an eagle and the wry humor of a scholarly jester, knowing that behind every statistical variable lay the potential for unexpected revelations and, perhaps, a dash of statistical mischief.

In the end, our methodology embodied the perfect blend of scholarly rigor and lighthearted inquiry, much like a well-crafted cocktail of statistical significance and statistical shenanigans. With our data analysis capers complete, we emerged from the statistical rabbit hole with a newfound understanding of the peculiar kinship between Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls, ready to unveil our whimsically astute findings to the world of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7978587, r-squared of 0.6365786, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an ambitious exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of biomass power in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. In the realms of statistical correlation, we delve deep into the numbers, hoping to unearth an unlikely connection. Drawing from data provided by the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 dating back from 1980 to 2021. Our research takes a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, utilizing puns and playful observations to break the ice and shed light on this unexpected relationship. Join us on a whimsical journey through statistical analysis and automobile mishaps as we unravel the mystery behind Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Biomass power and automotive recalls may seem as likely to go together as oil and water, but in the world of research, unexpected associations can drive groundbreaking discoveries. Much like the conundrum of why the chicken crossed the road, we find ourselves contemplating the unlikely link between Türkiye's biomass power generation and the automotive recalls issued by the illustrious Porsche. As we embark on this academic escapade, we aim to unravel the tangled web of data and unveil the surprising statistical connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
In the realm of statistical inquiry, we often encounter enigmatic and sometimes bewildering relationships among variables, much like unraveling the plot of a good mystery novel. While some correlations are as obvious as finding a needle in a haystack, others hide in plain sight, waiting for the discerning eye to uncover their secrets. In the case of biomass power in Türkiye and Porsche recalls, we find ourselves on a quest akin to deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle – a delightful challenge for the adventurous statistician.
As we peer through the magnifying glass of statistical analysis, we endeavor to maintain an air of levity and playfulness, much like a detective donning a whimsical hat to add a touch of mirth to the investigation. Our approach embraces the inherent unpredictability and, at times, absurdity of scientific inquiry, allowing for moments of humor and amusement amidst the rigors of data analysis. After all, what good is research without a sprinkling of puns, a dash of wit, and the occasional unexpected twist to keep us on our toes?
In this paper, we aim to showcase the surprising camaraderie between Türkiye's biomass boffins and Porsche's recall conundrums, employing statistical methods that will leave no stone unturned and no outlier unexamined. So, fasten your seatbelts, and let's rev up our engines as we embark on a journey through numbers, correlations, and the delightful unpredictability of research – all in pursuit of uncovering the Porsche recall rhyme in Türkiye's biomass bonanza.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the connection between biomass power generated in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche are as intriguing as a good plot twist in a detective novel. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.6365786 further underscores the substantial portion of variance in automotive recalls that can be explained by the variance in biomass power generation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, providing strong evidence for the association we have uncovered.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between biomass power generation in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. The scatterplot graphically depicts the tight relationship between these variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of their connection. It's as if biomasses and recalls are holding hands and skipping through the data fields together!

It's worth noting that while the correlation is strong, our findings do not imply causation. We are not suggesting that biomass power generation directly leads to automotive recalls or vice versa. Rather, our results point to an intriguing association that deserves further exploration.

In the realm of statistical investigation, we often encounter unexpected and whimsical connections that keep us on our toes, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in a minefield of data. Our research has added a touch of playfulness to the serious world of statistical analysis, demonstrating that even the most unlikely pairings can reveal fascinating insights when examined through the lens of rigorous inquiry.

In summary, our findings shine a light on the unlikely kinship between Türkiye's biomass power generation and Porsche's automotive recalls, reminding us that in the world of research, there are always surprises waiting to be discovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an ambitious exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of biomass power in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. In the realms of statistical correlation, we delve deep into the numbers, hoping to unearth an unlikely connection. Drawing from data provided by the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 dating back from 1980 to 2021. Our research takes a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, utilizing puns and playful observations to break the ice and shed light on this unexpected relationship. Join us on a whimsical journey through statistical analysis and automobile mishaps as we unravel the mystery behind Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the connection between biomass power generation in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche has sparked both curiosity and skepticism within the academic community. Smith and Doe (2015) delve into the intricacies of biomass power in Türkiye, painting a comprehensive picture of the industry's growth and its economic implications, while Jones (2017) scrutinizes the historical trends of automotive recalls, establishing a framework for understanding the complexities of automobile safety and quality control. However, as we move beyond these conventional sources, the literature takes a whimsical turn toward unexpected realms.
In "The Biomass Revolution: Powering the Future," Lorem and Ipsum (2020) provide a compelling narrative of Türkiye's biomass power evolution, a tale replete with twists and turns much like a thrilling mystery novel. On the other hand, "Recall Roulette: A Chronicle of Automotive Anomalies" by Ipsum and Lorem (2018) offers a colorful account of Porsche's recall escapades, capturing the capricious nature of automotive mishaps with a humorous flair.
Taking a detour into fictional literature, "The Biofuel Mysteries" by Jane A. Smith (2019) weaves a perplexing narrative of intrigue and suspense set within Türkiye's biomass power sector, invoking the spirit of an enigmatic Agatha Christie novel. Meanwhile, "Porsche Problems: A Tale of Recalls and Resilience" by John C. Doe (2016) regales readers with a fictionalized account of the tumultuous world of automotive recalls through the lens of a gripping detective thriller.
Our whimsical exploration doesn't stop there. As we venture into the world of children's entertainment, the animated series "Biomass Bonanza" and "Porsche Perils" offer a lighthearted yet surprisingly insightful take on biomass power and automotive mishaps. These delightful shows encourage viewers to embrace the playful side of research, highlighting the unexpected connections that often lay hidden beneath the surface.
In our quest to unearth the correlation between Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls, we are unearthing a treasure trove of unexpected literary and cultural references, reminding us that research can both be intellectually stimulating and delightfully entertaining. As we continue our journey, we anticipate even more surprising revelations and, perhaps, a joke or two along the way. After all, what's research without a touch of whimsy?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between biomass power generated in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche are as intriguing as a good plot twist in a detective novel. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.6365786 further underscores the substantial portion of variance in automotive recalls that can be explained by the variance in biomass power generation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, providing strong evidence for the association we have uncovered.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between biomass power generation in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. The scatterplot graphically depicts the tight relationship between these variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of their connection. It's as if biomasses and recalls are holding hands and skipping through the data fields together!
It's worth noting that while the correlation is strong, our findings do not imply causation. We are not suggesting that biomass power generation directly leads to automotive recalls or vice versa. Rather, our results point to an intriguing association that deserves further exploration.
In the realm of statistical investigation, we often encounter unexpected and whimsical connections that keep us on our toes, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in a minefield of data. Our research has added a touch of playfulness to the serious world of statistical analysis, demonstrating that even the most unlikely pairings can reveal fascinating insights when examined through the lens of rigorous inquiry.
In summary, our findings shine a light on the unlikely kinship between Türkiye's biomass power generation and Porsche's automotive recalls, reminding us that in the world of research, there are always surprises waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have shed light on the intriguing connection between biomass power generated in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche, and boy, what a ride it has been! Our statistics have not only revealed a robust correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables but have also added a touch of whimsy to the world of research.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 between biomass power and automotive recalls is as strong as Hercules flaunting his muscles, and with a p-value of less than 0.01, this is no statistical fluke. It seems that Biomass and Porsche recalls have been playing a game of peekaboo in the data, daring us to unravel their unlikely dance. With an r-squared value of 0.6365786, we've managed to explain a substantial portion of the variance in automotive recalls through the variance in biomass power generation. It's like Biomass is whispering secrets to Porsche, and we're the lucky eavesdroppers.

Our results support prior research that has flirted with the connection between these two variables. Much like the labyrinthine plot of a suspense novel, the literature has hinted at the tantalizing possibility of Biomass power generation and Porsche recalls waltzing in unforeseen harmony. While our findings may seem improbable, the prior literature has playfully set the stage for our serious statistical foray, inviting us to explore the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface.

Taking a leaf out of Lorem and Ipsum's "The Biomass Revolution: Powering the Future," we've successfully identified a powerful relationship between Türkiye's biomass power evolution and Porsche's recall escapades. It's as if Biomass and Porsche have been in cahoots all along, plotting their master plan under the guise of statistical variables.

Fig. 1, our scatterplot, vividly captures the whimsical love story between these variables, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of their bond. It's as if Biomasses and recalls are holding hands and frolicking through the data fields together, like an unlikely couple dancing a passionate tango.

In conclusion, our study has not only uncovered a surprising connection but has also injected a playful dose of humor into the serious world of research. It serves as a delightful reminder that even in the realm of statistical inquiry, there is always room for unexpected findings and the occasional statistical pun that leaves us all chuckling in our lab coats. After all, who said that statistics can't have a little fun?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in Turkiye and Automotive recalls issued by Porsche. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an ambitious exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of biomass power in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. In the realms of statistical correlation, we delve deep into the numbers, hoping to unearth an unlikely connection. Drawing from data provided by the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 dating back from 1980 to 2021. Our research takes a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, utilizing puns and playful observations to break the ice and shed light on this unexpected relationship. Join us on a whimsical journey through statistical analysis and automobile mishaps as we unravel the mystery behind Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Biomass power and automotive recalls may seem as likely to go together as oil and water, but in the world of research, unexpected associations can drive groundbreaking discoveries. Much like the conundrum of why the chicken crossed the road, we find ourselves contemplating the unlikely link between Türkiye's biomass power generation and the automotive recalls issued by the illustrious Porsche. As we embark on this academic escapade, we aim to unravel the tangled web of data and unveil the surprising statistical connection between these seemingly unrelated entities.
In the realm of statistical inquiry, we often encounter enigmatic and sometimes bewildering relationships among variables, much like unraveling the plot of a good mystery novel. While some correlations are as obvious as finding a needle in a haystack, others hide in plain sight, waiting for the discerning eye to uncover their secrets. In the case of biomass power in Türkiye and Porsche recalls, we find ourselves on a quest akin to deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle – a delightful challenge for the adventurous statistician.
As we peer through the magnifying glass of statistical analysis, we endeavor to maintain an air of levity and playfulness, much like a detective donning a whimsical hat to add a touch of mirth to the investigation. Our approach embraces the inherent unpredictability and, at times, absurdity of scientific inquiry, allowing for moments of humor and amusement amidst the rigors of data analysis. After all, what good is research without a sprinkling of puns, a dash of wit, and the occasional unexpected twist to keep us on our toes?
In this paper, we aim to showcase the surprising camaraderie between Türkiye's biomass boffins and Porsche's recall conundrums, employing statistical methods that will leave no stone unturned and no outlier unexamined. So, fasten your seatbelts, and let's rev up our engines as we embark on a journey through numbers, correlations, and the delightful unpredictability of research – all in pursuit of uncovering the Porsche recall rhyme in Türkiye's biomass bonanza.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between biomass power generated in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche are as intriguing as a good plot twist in a detective novel. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.6365786 further underscores the substantial portion of variance in automotive recalls that can be explained by the variance in biomass power generation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, providing strong evidence for the association we have uncovered.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between biomass power generation in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. The scatterplot graphically depicts the tight relationship between these variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of their connection. It's as if biomasses and recalls are holding hands and skipping through the data fields together!
It's worth noting that while the correlation is strong, our findings do not imply causation. We are not suggesting that biomass power generation directly leads to automotive recalls or vice versa. Rather, our results point to an intriguing association that deserves further exploration.
In the realm of statistical investigation, we often encounter unexpected and whimsical connections that keep us on our toes, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in a minefield of data. Our research has added a touch of playfulness to the serious world of statistical analysis, demonstrating that even the most unlikely pairings can reveal fascinating insights when examined through the lens of rigorous inquiry.
In summary, our findings shine a light on the unlikely kinship between Türkiye's biomass power generation and Porsche's automotive recalls, reminding us that in the world of research, there are always surprises waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up our whimsical odyssey through the labyrinth of statistical analysis, we find ourselves astounded by the delightful camaraderie between Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche's automotive recalls. It's as if these variables have been best buddies all along, sharing secrets and shenanigans behind our backs!

Our findings have not only revealed a strong statistical connection but have also infused a bit of levity into the often serious world of research. After all, who knew that biomass power and automotive recalls would make such an amusing pair? It's like discovering that peanut butter and jelly have been in cahoots all this time!

However, it is important to remember that correlation does not imply causation. We're not suggesting that biomass power in Türkiye is causing Porsche recalls or that Porsches are running on recycled wood chips. But the statistical dance between these variables is indeed a toe-tapping spectacle that leaves us pondering the quirky mysteries of the scientific world.

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the unexpected connection between Türkiye's biomass boffins and Porsche's recall rhymes, proving that in the realm of statistics, there's always a surprise waiting to be unveiled. As for further research, we assert with confidence that no additional investigation is needed in this quirky domain. It's time to rev up our statistics engines and embark on new adventures, leaving the biomasses and recalls to their unlikely rendezvous.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Eclectic Bioengineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Applied Biomass Research and Analysis (SABRA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Türkiye's Biomass Boffins: Uncovering the Porsche Recall Rhyme with an abstract of This paper presents an ambitious exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of biomass power in Türkiye and automotive recalls issued by Porsche. In the realms of statistical correlation, we delve deep into the numbers, hoping to unearth an unlikely connection. Drawing from data provided by the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7978587 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 dating back from 1980 to 2021. Our research takes a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, utilizing puns and playful observations to break the ice and shed light on this unexpected relationship. Join us on a whimsical journey through statistical analysis and automobile mishaps as we unravel the mystery behind Türkiye's biomass power and Porsche recalls.

ChatGPT:

Türkiye, biomass power, Türkiye biomass power, Porsche recall, automotive recall, statistical correlation, correlation coefficient, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Transportation, biomass energy, Porsche mishaps, statistical analysis, Türkiye power industry, Porsche statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Biomass power generated in Turkiye
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Turkiye in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Turkiye

Automotive recalls issued by Porsche
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Porsche
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Porsche

Correlation r = 0.7978587 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6365786 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Porsche) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Biomass power generated in Turkiye) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.5E-10. 0.0000000002504704243404141400
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 2.5E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,992,487,347 random variables You don't actually need 3 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Biomass power generated in Turkiye (Billion kWh)0.1290.1050000000000.0380.0470.0560.0510.2220.1760.2940.2410.1330.220.230.1740.1160.1040.1220.1530.2140.2190.2520.3330.3430.5920.8791.0831.2411.6352.0962.653.5064.4455.86832
Automotive recalls issued by Porsche (Recalls)01210411022243121040120580111023436368813417




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.129,0.105,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.038,0.047,0.056,0.051,0.222,0.176,0.294,0.241,0.133,0.22,0.23,0.174,0.116,0.104,0.122,0.153,0.214,0.219,0.252,0.333,0.343,0.592,0.879,1.083,1.241,1.635,2.096,2.65,3.506,4.445,5.86832,])
array_2 = np.array([0,1,2,1,0,4,1,1,0,2,2,2,4,3,1,2,1,0,4,0,1,2,0,5,8,0,1,1,1,0,2,3,4,3,6,3,6,8,8,13,4,17,])
array_1_name = "Biomass power generated in Turkiye"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Porsche"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1580 · Black Variable ID: 24049 · Red Variable ID: 1132
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0