Spurious correlation #1,564 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is xkcd comics published about physics and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'. The chart goes from 2007 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is xkcd comics published about physics and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'. The chart goes from 2007 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As the XKCD physics comics multiplied, so did people's understanding of blood flow, leading to a surge in interest in tourniquet application. Remember, when in doubt, just remember the comic where the physicist says, "I can't stop the bleeding, but I can make it your problem!"

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a pop art-inspired image of a cozy living room setting. In the center, a person sits on a vibrant couch reading an xkcd comic book about physics. Opposite the person, on the coffee table, an open laptop displays a pixelated Google search for "how to apply a tourniquet." The person is absorbed in learning first aid techniques while surrounded by the colorful and bold pop art-inspired decor of the room. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: xkcd comics published about physics and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Futuristic Pop art Celtic art Oragami
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both xkcd comics published about physics and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy living room, a person is sitting on a comfortable couch reading an xkcd comic book about physics, while at the same time, on the coffee table, a laptop is open displaying a Google search for "how to apply a tourniquet" as the person is learning first aid techniques.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room, a person is sitting on a comfortable couch reading an xkcd comic book about physics, while at the same time, on the coffee table, a laptop is open displaying a Google search for "how to apply a tourniquet" as the person is learning first aid techniques. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a pop art-inspired image of a cozy living room setting. In the center, a person sits on a vibrant couch reading an xkcd comic book about physics. Opposite the person, on the coffee table, an open laptop displays a pixelated Google search for "how to apply a tourniquet." The person is absorbed in learning first aid techniques while surrounded by the colorful and bold pop art-inspired decor of the room.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in xkcd comics published about physics caused how to apply a tourniquet (Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'

The Journal of Humor and Physics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about physics and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of humor and human behavior has long puzzled researchers. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between xkcd comics, known for their witty exploration of physics, and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' The juxtaposition of quips about quarks with queries about quick medical interventions has sparked our curiosity and set the stage for this unique investigation.

Drawing on a dataset spanning from 2007 to 2023, we harnessed the power of AI analysis to uncover any connections between the publication of xkcd comics focused on physics topics and the frequency of Google searches for instructions on applying tourniquets. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly disparate subjects.

While we set out to explore the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, we unexpectedly stumbled upon an amusing observation. It appears that as the comic-induced chuckles about momentum and relativity spread, individuals may experience a sudden urge to brush up on their first-aid skills – perhaps in an attempt to save face in case of a physics-related mishap. It seems even the world of web searches can't escape the forces of gravitas and levity!

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unexpected correlation between xkcd physics humor and queries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this research prompts further investigation into the quirky ways in which humor influences human behavior. And remember, in the world of research as well as first aid, precision is key – you don't want to end up with a "bandage" solution!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of understanding the intricate relationship between humor and human behavior has led researchers down many an unexpected rabbit hole. In this paper, we embark on a peculiar journey to explore the correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their witty take on physics concepts, and the Google queries for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' If you think analyzing internet searches for tourniquet applications and physics-themed webcomics doesn't have potential, then you're in for a shock – just like a well-applied tourniquet.
The fusion of physics-themed comedy and life-saving first-aid queries has sparked our curiosity and prompted us to delve into the data with the precision of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian. As the saying goes, "If at first you don't succeed, try, try a tourniquet" – or something along those lines.
Spanning the years from 2007 to 2023, our dataset offers a unique peek into the online behavior of individuals grappling with the duality of contemplating the nature of the universe and seeking instructions for administering emergency medical care. Our analysis, utilizing state-of-the-art AI algorithms, uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a p-value that's so low, it almost needs a step stool to reach. These statistical outcomes indicate a notable connection between the physics-based humor found in xkcd comics and the surge in searches for tourniquet application. Who would've thought that the search for 'how to stop bleeding' could be correlated with musings on the behavior of subatomic particles?
While our primary aim was to investigate the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, the results unveiled an unexpected twist. It seems that as individuals indulge in guffaws over gravitational waves and quips about quantum mechanics, there's a surge in searches for techniques to staunch bleeding. It appears that the laws of physics and the exigencies of first aid have formed an unlikely bond – one that could make even Schrödinger scratch his head in bewilderment.
In summary, our research illuminates the intriguing correlation between xkcd comics centered on physics and the inquiries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this study sparks further exploration into the peculiar ways in which humor influences human behavior. And in the world of research, as in first aid, remember that precision is key – after all, you wouldn't want to apply a "tourni-quet" solution!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between humor and its effect on human behavior has long been a subject of fascination among researchers. In the realm of physics, xkcd, a webcomic created by Randall Munroe, has garnered substantial attention for its clever elucidation of complex scientific principles through humorous and often whimsical narratives. Meanwhile, the internet has become a ubiquitous source of information and queries, encompassing an array of subjects, including first aid and emergency medical procedures. In "Smith et al.'s study," the authors find a direct correlation between exposure to humor and subsequent search behavior, postulating that individuals may seek knowledge in response to engaging with lighthearted material.

But what led us to explore the peculiar correlation between xkcd physics comics and searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'? Well, it all started when we realized that combining physics jokes with medical emergencies could result in some seriously "punny" situations. In "Doe's research," the authors delve into the impact of disparate stimuli on information-seeking behavior, shedding light on the potential interplay between seemingly unrelated subjects.

As we delved deeper into the literature, we found that humor has been associated with increased cognitive function and information retention. Hence, it's no surprise that exposure to physics-related humor in xkcd comics could inadvertently prompt individuals to undertake searches for practical medical advice. It's almost as if the comics are saying, "If you can't handle the puns, you might need to know how to apply a 'tourni-quit'."

Drawing on non-fiction works such as "The Physics of Superheroes" by James Kakalios and "Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers" by Mary Roach, we observed that the intersection of science and unexpected scenarios can lead to fascinating insights, much like the surprising link we uncovered between physics-based humor and inquiries about tourniquet application. Who would have thought that exploring the physics of superheroes could eventually lead to a deep dive into emergency medical procedures? It's almost like a superhero origin story, but with more physics and less capes!

Adding to our exploration of related literature, we turned to fictional narratives that touch upon science, medicine, and humor, such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "House of God" by Samuel Shem. These works, although not directly related to our specific investigation, underscore the enduring appeal of intertwining serious subjects with comedic elements. After all, even in the face of medical emergencies, a good laugh can be the best medicine – though in the case of applying a tourniquet, a well-executed binding might come in handy too!

Moreover, childhood cartoons and television shows, such as "Bill Nye the Science Guy" and "The Magic School Bus," have demonstrated the effectiveness of using humor to convey scientific concepts to young audiences. These programs not only entertained but also educated viewers about the mysteries of the universe and the intricacies of the human body. Perhaps the lighthearted approach of these shows sowed the seeds for our own inquiry, leading us to bridge the gap between physics-inspired amusement and emergency medical knowledge.

In summary, the convergence of physics-themed humor in xkcd comics with searches for practical medical guidance highlights the intricate ways in which humor can influence information-seeking behavior. We aim to build upon this initial exploration to unravel the enigmatic relationship between entertainment, education, and human curiosity. And in the spirit of this analysis, we urge researchers to approach their work with the precision of a mathematician and the levity of a stand-up comedian - just be careful not to get "tangled" in the process!

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about physics and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of humor and human behavior has long puzzled researchers. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between xkcd comics, known for their witty exploration of physics, and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' The juxtaposition of quips about quarks with queries about quick medical interventions has sparked our curiosity and set the stage for this unique investigation.

Drawing on a dataset spanning from 2007 to 2023, we harnessed the power of AI analysis to uncover any connections between the publication of xkcd comics focused on physics topics and the frequency of Google searches for instructions on applying tourniquets. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly disparate subjects.

While we set out to explore the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, we unexpectedly stumbled upon an amusing observation. It appears that as the comic-induced chuckles about momentum and relativity spread, individuals may experience a sudden urge to brush up on their first-aid skills – perhaps in an attempt to save face in case of a physics-related mishap. It seems even the world of web searches can't escape the forces of gravitas and levity!

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unexpected correlation between xkcd physics humor and queries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this research prompts further investigation into the quirky ways in which humor influences human behavior. And remember, in the world of research as well as first aid, precision is key – you don't want to end up with a "bandage" solution!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of understanding the intricate relationship between humor and human behavior has led researchers down many an unexpected rabbit hole. In this paper, we embark on a peculiar journey to explore the correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their witty take on physics concepts, and the Google queries for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' If you think analyzing internet searches for tourniquet applications and physics-themed webcomics doesn't have potential, then you're in for a shock – just like a well-applied tourniquet.
The fusion of physics-themed comedy and life-saving first-aid queries has sparked our curiosity and prompted us to delve into the data with the precision of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian. As the saying goes, "If at first you don't succeed, try, try a tourniquet" – or something along those lines.
Spanning the years from 2007 to 2023, our dataset offers a unique peek into the online behavior of individuals grappling with the duality of contemplating the nature of the universe and seeking instructions for administering emergency medical care. Our analysis, utilizing state-of-the-art AI algorithms, uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a p-value that's so low, it almost needs a step stool to reach. These statistical outcomes indicate a notable connection between the physics-based humor found in xkcd comics and the surge in searches for tourniquet application. Who would've thought that the search for 'how to stop bleeding' could be correlated with musings on the behavior of subatomic particles?
While our primary aim was to investigate the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, the results unveiled an unexpected twist. It seems that as individuals indulge in guffaws over gravitational waves and quips about quantum mechanics, there's a surge in searches for techniques to staunch bleeding. It appears that the laws of physics and the exigencies of first aid have formed an unlikely bond – one that could make even Schrödinger scratch his head in bewilderment.
In summary, our research illuminates the intriguing correlation between xkcd comics centered on physics and the inquiries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this study sparks further exploration into the peculiar ways in which humor influences human behavior. And in the world of research, as in first aid, remember that precision is key – after all, you wouldn't want to apply a "tourni-quet" solution!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the hidden threads connecting xkcd comics to the quest for tourniquet knowledge, we employed a multi-faceted and, dare I say, pun-derful methodology. First, we undertook the Herculean task of identifying all xkcd comics that delved into the realm of physics, where jokes about quantum mechanics collide with gags about gravitational waves. Our crack team of researchers scoured the internet, sifting through myriad webcomics with the dedication of a scholar and the wit of a stand-up physicist. The curated dataset ranged from the early days of 2007 to the futuristic frontier of 2023, capturing the evolution of both xkcd content and internet search behaviors over time.

Next, we turned our attention to the oracle of search inquiries – Google Trends. With our statistical magnifying glass in hand, we scrutinized the frequency of searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet' with the vigilance of a hawk-eyed statistician. Our goal? To discern any fluctuations in search volume that corresponded with the publication of physics-themed xkcd comics. As the data flooded our screens like a deluge of scientific discovery, we combed through the digital waves to tease out any correlations – and perhaps a few punny jokes to lighten the data analysis mood.

In our pursuit of scientific rigor (and comedic relief), we roped in the expertise of artificial intelligence. Our trusty AI ally performed a sophisticated dance of data analysis, examining patterns and trends with a precision that would make a quantum physicist nod in approval. Through the fusion of AI prowess and good ol' human intuition, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437, a statistical gem that glittered brighter than a physicist's particle accelerator. What's more, the p-value emerged from the data like a rare discovery, boasting significance levels lower than an ant's basement – a testament to the robustness of the observed relationship.

But hold on to your lab coats, because the real fun began when we stumbled upon a quirky observation amidst the sea of data. It appears that as xkcd comics twirled through the annals of the internet, tickling funny bones with physics puns and relativity riddles, an intriguing phenomenon unfolded. Behold – a surge in the quest for first-aid knowledge, as individuals sought guidance on tourniquet applications to stem the hypothetical bleeding resulting from a physics-induced mishap. It seems that as the laughter over angular momentum and wave-particle duality reverberates, so does the urgency to grasp the art of tourniquet tying. Who knew the gentle art of web searches could be so whimsical?

In conclusion, our methodology harnessed the power of AI analysis, internet scouring, and statistical sorcery to unravel the enigmatic link between xkcd physics humor and the search for tourniquet wisdom. Through meticulous data spelunking and the occasional chuckle at a physics-themed pun, we've unveiled a connection that transcends the realms of physics and first-aid, paving the way for further exploration into the curious interplay of humor and human behavior. And remember, in the labyrinth of research and the jungle of jest, precision is the compass guiding us through the deep dark depths – after all, we wouldn't want to fall victim to a "phasor" error, now would we?

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about physics and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.7262437, r-squared of 0.5274299, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of humor and human behavior has long puzzled researchers. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between xkcd comics, known for their witty exploration of physics, and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' The juxtaposition of quips about quarks with queries about quick medical interventions has sparked our curiosity and set the stage for this unique investigation.

Drawing on a dataset spanning from 2007 to 2023, we harnessed the power of AI analysis to uncover any connections between the publication of xkcd comics focused on physics topics and the frequency of Google searches for instructions on applying tourniquets. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly disparate subjects.

While we set out to explore the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, we unexpectedly stumbled upon an amusing observation. It appears that as the comic-induced chuckles about momentum and relativity spread, individuals may experience a sudden urge to brush up on their first-aid skills – perhaps in an attempt to save face in case of a physics-related mishap. It seems even the world of web searches can't escape the forces of gravitas and levity!

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unexpected correlation between xkcd physics humor and queries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this research prompts further investigation into the quirky ways in which humor influences human behavior. And remember, in the world of research as well as first aid, precision is key – you don't want to end up with a "bandage" solution!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of understanding the intricate relationship between humor and human behavior has led researchers down many an unexpected rabbit hole. In this paper, we embark on a peculiar journey to explore the correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their witty take on physics concepts, and the Google queries for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' If you think analyzing internet searches for tourniquet applications and physics-themed webcomics doesn't have potential, then you're in for a shock – just like a well-applied tourniquet.
The fusion of physics-themed comedy and life-saving first-aid queries has sparked our curiosity and prompted us to delve into the data with the precision of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian. As the saying goes, "If at first you don't succeed, try, try a tourniquet" – or something along those lines.
Spanning the years from 2007 to 2023, our dataset offers a unique peek into the online behavior of individuals grappling with the duality of contemplating the nature of the universe and seeking instructions for administering emergency medical care. Our analysis, utilizing state-of-the-art AI algorithms, uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a p-value that's so low, it almost needs a step stool to reach. These statistical outcomes indicate a notable connection between the physics-based humor found in xkcd comics and the surge in searches for tourniquet application. Who would've thought that the search for 'how to stop bleeding' could be correlated with musings on the behavior of subatomic particles?
While our primary aim was to investigate the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, the results unveiled an unexpected twist. It seems that as individuals indulge in guffaws over gravitational waves and quips about quantum mechanics, there's a surge in searches for techniques to staunch bleeding. It appears that the laws of physics and the exigencies of first aid have formed an unlikely bond – one that could make even Schrödinger scratch his head in bewilderment.
In summary, our research illuminates the intriguing correlation between xkcd comics centered on physics and the inquiries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this study sparks further exploration into the peculiar ways in which humor influences human behavior. And in the world of research, as in first aid, remember that precision is key – after all, you wouldn't want to apply a "tourni-quet" solution!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.7262437 between the publication of xkcd comics related to physics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' This correlation indicates a noteworthy relationship between the two seemingly unrelated topics, sparking thoughts of an elastic connection between the world of physics and the need to stop things from going awry.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5274299 suggests that over 52% of the variability in the frequency of tourniquet application searches can be explained by the publication of physics-themed xkcd comics. It's as if the humor in these comics has the power to tie together the disparate threads of physics and first aid in an unexpected, yet strangely logical, manner.

The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 not only underscores the strength of the correlation but also highlights the robustness of the relationship. It's as if the p-value and the correlation coefficient danced a tango, showcasing the tight bond between xkcd physics humor and the urgent need for medical response knowledge.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showing the clear positive correlation between the two variables. One can't help but wonder if the comic strips are acting as a sort of cosmic magnet, drawing attention to not just the laws of nature but also the laws of emergency care.

In summary, the results of this study present a peculiar yet compelling connection between xkcd physics-themed comics and the public's interest in acquiring knowledge about tourniquet application. It seems that even in the whimsical world of webcomics and internet searches, there is a pull toward an unexpected fusion of physics and first aid, leaving us to wonder if humor truly does have the power to bind together the most unlikely of subjects. After all, when it comes to research, as well as emergency response, it's essential to maintain a sense of humor – or you might find yourself in need of more than just a tourniquet!

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about physics and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of humor and human behavior has long puzzled researchers. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between xkcd comics, known for their witty exploration of physics, and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' The juxtaposition of quips about quarks with queries about quick medical interventions has sparked our curiosity and set the stage for this unique investigation.

Drawing on a dataset spanning from 2007 to 2023, we harnessed the power of AI analysis to uncover any connections between the publication of xkcd comics focused on physics topics and the frequency of Google searches for instructions on applying tourniquets. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly disparate subjects.

While we set out to explore the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, we unexpectedly stumbled upon an amusing observation. It appears that as the comic-induced chuckles about momentum and relativity spread, individuals may experience a sudden urge to brush up on their first-aid skills – perhaps in an attempt to save face in case of a physics-related mishap. It seems even the world of web searches can't escape the forces of gravitas and levity!

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unexpected correlation between xkcd physics humor and queries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this research prompts further investigation into the quirky ways in which humor influences human behavior. And remember, in the world of research as well as first aid, precision is key – you don't want to end up with a "bandage" solution!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between humor and its effect on human behavior has long been a subject of fascination among researchers. In the realm of physics, xkcd, a webcomic created by Randall Munroe, has garnered substantial attention for its clever elucidation of complex scientific principles through humorous and often whimsical narratives. Meanwhile, the internet has become a ubiquitous source of information and queries, encompassing an array of subjects, including first aid and emergency medical procedures. In "Smith et al.'s study," the authors find a direct correlation between exposure to humor and subsequent search behavior, postulating that individuals may seek knowledge in response to engaging with lighthearted material.
But what led us to explore the peculiar correlation between xkcd physics comics and searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'? Well, it all started when we realized that combining physics jokes with medical emergencies could result in some seriously "punny" situations. In "Doe's research," the authors delve into the impact of disparate stimuli on information-seeking behavior, shedding light on the potential interplay between seemingly unrelated subjects.
As we delved deeper into the literature, we found that humor has been associated with increased cognitive function and information retention. Hence, it's no surprise that exposure to physics-related humor in xkcd comics could inadvertently prompt individuals to undertake searches for practical medical advice. It's almost as if the comics are saying, "If you can't handle the puns, you might need to know how to apply a 'tourni-quit'."
Drawing on non-fiction works such as "The Physics of Superheroes" by James Kakalios and "Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers" by Mary Roach, we observed that the intersection of science and unexpected scenarios can lead to fascinating insights, much like the surprising link we uncovered between physics-based humor and inquiries about tourniquet application. Who would have thought that exploring the physics of superheroes could eventually lead to a deep dive into emergency medical procedures? It's almost like a superhero origin story, but with more physics and less capes!
Adding to our exploration of related literature, we turned to fictional narratives that touch upon science, medicine, and humor, such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "House of God" by Samuel Shem. These works, although not directly related to our specific investigation, underscore the enduring appeal of intertwining serious subjects with comedic elements. After all, even in the face of medical emergencies, a good laugh can be the best medicine – though in the case of applying a tourniquet, a well-executed binding might come in handy too!
Moreover, childhood cartoons and television shows, such as "Bill Nye the Science Guy" and "The Magic School Bus," have demonstrated the effectiveness of using humor to convey scientific concepts to young audiences. These programs not only entertained but also educated viewers about the mysteries of the universe and the intricacies of the human body. Perhaps the lighthearted approach of these shows sowed the seeds for our own inquiry, leading us to bridge the gap between physics-inspired amusement and emergency medical knowledge.
In summary, the convergence of physics-themed humor in xkcd comics with searches for practical medical guidance highlights the intricate ways in which humor can influence information-seeking behavior. We aim to build upon this initial exploration to unravel the enigmatic relationship between entertainment, education, and human curiosity. And in the spirit of this analysis, we urge researchers to approach their work with the precision of a mathematician and the levity of a stand-up comedian - just be careful not to get "tangled" in the process!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.7262437 between the publication of xkcd comics related to physics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' This correlation indicates a noteworthy relationship between the two seemingly unrelated topics, sparking thoughts of an elastic connection between the world of physics and the need to stop things from going awry.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5274299 suggests that over 52% of the variability in the frequency of tourniquet application searches can be explained by the publication of physics-themed xkcd comics. It's as if the humor in these comics has the power to tie together the disparate threads of physics and first aid in an unexpected, yet strangely logical, manner.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 not only underscores the strength of the correlation but also highlights the robustness of the relationship. It's as if the p-value and the correlation coefficient danced a tango, showcasing the tight bond between xkcd physics humor and the urgent need for medical response knowledge.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showing the clear positive correlation between the two variables. One can't help but wonder if the comic strips are acting as a sort of cosmic magnet, drawing attention to not just the laws of nature but also the laws of emergency care.
In summary, the results of this study present a peculiar yet compelling connection between xkcd physics-themed comics and the public's interest in acquiring knowledge about tourniquet application. It seems that even in the whimsical world of webcomics and internet searches, there is a pull toward an unexpected fusion of physics and first aid, leaving us to wonder if humor truly does have the power to bind together the most unlikely of subjects. After all, when it comes to research, as well as emergency response, it's essential to maintain a sense of humor – or you might find yourself in need of more than just a tourniquet!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the correlation between xkcd physics comics and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet' has uncovered an unexpected and fascinating relationship. As predicted by Smith et al., we indeed found a direct connection between exposure to humor and subsequent information-seeking behavior, further reinforcing the influence of humor on human curiosity. It's as if the jokes in xkcd comics are not just amusing but also "wound" up influencing individuals to seek out practical medical knowledge - talk about a "comic twist" on information-seeking behavior!

Moreover, in line with previous research by Doe, our findings support the interplay between seemingly unrelated subjects, highlighting the potential ripple effect of engaging with diverse stimulus. The unexpected bridge between physics humor and medical queries demonstrates that the mind can indeed make connections in the most unexpected places - perhaps akin to finding an emergency tourniquet in a physicist's tool kit!

The statistically significant correlation coefficient and the robustness of the relationship, as indicated by the p-value and r-squared value, provide solid evidence of the link between xkcd physics humor and interest in first-aid techniques. It's almost like the physics jokes are creating a "tourni-quet" of knowledge-seeking behavior, binding together the realms of science and emergency response in a way that defies conventional logic.

Our results further bolster the notion that humor can influence information-seeking behavior, as posited by "Smith et al." – albeit in a context as unexpected as applying a tourniquet. It's as if the universe is telling us that even in the face of an emergency, a well-timed joke can still "tourni-quer" attention and prompt action.

In summary, our study not only validates prior research on the impact of humor on information-seeking behavior but also unearths a curious connection between physics-themed amusement and practical medical knowledge. As we advance our understanding of this quirky correlation, we encourage researchers to keep a light-hearted perspective and be open to unexpected connections – after all, you never know when a physics joke might just "suture" a serious research gap!

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about physics and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The intersection of humor and human behavior has long puzzled researchers. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between xkcd comics, known for their witty exploration of physics, and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' The juxtaposition of quips about quarks with queries about quick medical interventions has sparked our curiosity and set the stage for this unique investigation.

Drawing on a dataset spanning from 2007 to 2023, we harnessed the power of AI analysis to uncover any connections between the publication of xkcd comics focused on physics topics and the frequency of Google searches for instructions on applying tourniquets. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly disparate subjects.

While we set out to explore the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, we unexpectedly stumbled upon an amusing observation. It appears that as the comic-induced chuckles about momentum and relativity spread, individuals may experience a sudden urge to brush up on their first-aid skills – perhaps in an attempt to save face in case of a physics-related mishap. It seems even the world of web searches can't escape the forces of gravitas and levity!

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unexpected correlation between xkcd physics humor and queries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this research prompts further investigation into the quirky ways in which humor influences human behavior. And remember, in the world of research as well as first aid, precision is key – you don't want to end up with a "bandage" solution!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of understanding the intricate relationship between humor and human behavior has led researchers down many an unexpected rabbit hole. In this paper, we embark on a peculiar journey to explore the correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their witty take on physics concepts, and the Google queries for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' If you think analyzing internet searches for tourniquet applications and physics-themed webcomics doesn't have potential, then you're in for a shock – just like a well-applied tourniquet.
The fusion of physics-themed comedy and life-saving first-aid queries has sparked our curiosity and prompted us to delve into the data with the precision of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian. As the saying goes, "If at first you don't succeed, try, try a tourniquet" – or something along those lines.
Spanning the years from 2007 to 2023, our dataset offers a unique peek into the online behavior of individuals grappling with the duality of contemplating the nature of the universe and seeking instructions for administering emergency medical care. Our analysis, utilizing state-of-the-art AI algorithms, uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a p-value that's so low, it almost needs a step stool to reach. These statistical outcomes indicate a notable connection between the physics-based humor found in xkcd comics and the surge in searches for tourniquet application. Who would've thought that the search for 'how to stop bleeding' could be correlated with musings on the behavior of subatomic particles?
While our primary aim was to investigate the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, the results unveiled an unexpected twist. It seems that as individuals indulge in guffaws over gravitational waves and quips about quantum mechanics, there's a surge in searches for techniques to staunch bleeding. It appears that the laws of physics and the exigencies of first aid have formed an unlikely bond – one that could make even Schrödinger scratch his head in bewilderment.
In summary, our research illuminates the intriguing correlation between xkcd comics centered on physics and the inquiries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this study sparks further exploration into the peculiar ways in which humor influences human behavior. And in the world of research, as in first aid, remember that precision is key – after all, you wouldn't want to apply a "tourni-quet" solution!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.7262437 between the publication of xkcd comics related to physics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' This correlation indicates a noteworthy relationship between the two seemingly unrelated topics, sparking thoughts of an elastic connection between the world of physics and the need to stop things from going awry.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5274299 suggests that over 52% of the variability in the frequency of tourniquet application searches can be explained by the publication of physics-themed xkcd comics. It's as if the humor in these comics has the power to tie together the disparate threads of physics and first aid in an unexpected, yet strangely logical, manner.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 not only underscores the strength of the correlation but also highlights the robustness of the relationship. It's as if the p-value and the correlation coefficient danced a tango, showcasing the tight bond between xkcd physics humor and the urgent need for medical response knowledge.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showing the clear positive correlation between the two variables. One can't help but wonder if the comic strips are acting as a sort of cosmic magnet, drawing attention to not just the laws of nature but also the laws of emergency care.
In summary, the results of this study present a peculiar yet compelling connection between xkcd physics-themed comics and the public's interest in acquiring knowledge about tourniquet application. It seems that even in the whimsical world of webcomics and internet searches, there is a pull toward an unexpected fusion of physics and first aid, leaving us to wonder if humor truly does have the power to bind together the most unlikely of subjects. After all, when it comes to research, as well as emergency response, it's essential to maintain a sense of humor – or you might find yourself in need of more than just a tourniquet!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings have shed light on the surprising correlation between the publication of xkcd comics centered on physics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' It seems that as individuals revel in the hilarity of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, they also experience a sudden curiosity about securing an uncertain injury – talk about entangled interests!

The statistically significant correlation coefficient and p-value highlight the robustness of this peculiar relationship, suggesting that perhaps there's a quantum entanglement of sorts between the world of physics humor and the urgent need for emergency medical knowledge. It's as if the laws of comic whimsy and the laws of first aid have collided in a collision so perfectly inelastic, you'd think Newton himself planned it.

Our study has peeled back the layers of this unexpected connection and prompted us to ponder the deeper implications of humor on human curiosity and behavior. And as we wrap up this quirky exploration, always remember to approach both physics and first aid with caution – after all, you don't want to end up displaying behavior that's "Shocking" for all the wrong reasons!

We take this opportunity to assert that further research in this area is, quite frankly, unnecessary. With our findings, it's clear that the world of webcomics and web searches has its own unique sense of humor and connections – and sometimes, we just have to sit back, appreciate the quirkiness, and not overanalyze everything. After all, in the realm of research as well as in life, some things are best left as amusing mysteries.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Humor and Physics

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Humor and Emergency Medicine Research

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet' with an abstract of The intersection of humor and human behavior has long puzzled researchers. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between xkcd comics, known for their witty exploration of physics, and Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet.' The juxtaposition of quips about quarks with queries about quick medical interventions has sparked our curiosity and set the stage for this unique investigation.
Drawing on a dataset spanning from 2007 to 2023, we harnessed the power of AI analysis to uncover any connections between the publication of xkcd comics focused on physics topics and the frequency of Google searches for instructions on applying tourniquets. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7262437 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a noteworthy relationship between these two seemingly disparate subjects.
While we set out to explore the impact of physics-themed humor on public interest in emergency medical procedures, we unexpectedly stumbled upon an amusing observation. It appears that as the comic-induced chuckles about momentum and relativity spread, individuals may experience a sudden urge to brush up on their first-aid skills – perhaps in an attempt to save face in case of a physics-related mishap. It seems even the world of web searches can't escape the forces of gravitas and levity!
In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unexpected correlation between xkcd physics humor and queries for emergency medical knowledge. We hope this research prompts further investigation into the quirky ways in which humor influences human behavior. And remember, in the world of research as well as first aid, precision is key – you don't want to end up with a "bandage" solution!

ChatGPT:

xkcd comics, physics humor, Google searches, tourniquet application, correlation, humor and human behavior, AI analysis, dataset analysis, emergency medical procedures, first-aid skills, web search behavior, quirky humor influences, human behavior, physics-related mishap

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

xkcd comics published about physics
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about physics
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: ^{See full details} I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about physics

Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: ^{See full details} Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'

Correlation r = 0.7262437 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.5274299 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 52.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., xkcd comics published about physics) over the 17 years from 2007 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00096.^Show 0.0009624823326304478000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.73 in 0.096% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,039 random variables^Note Which I absolutely did.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.38, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023
xkcd comics published about physics (xkcd comics)	6	4	8	9	8	5	7	8	4	5	4	15	9	8	6	15	17
Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet' (Rel. search volume)	5.66667	0	4.25	4.75	6.08333	3.41667	6.33333	5.58333	6.33333	4.66667	8.5	10.0833	7.91667	9	8.83333	12.25	12.3

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6,4,8,9,8,5,7,8,4,5,4,15,9,8,6,15,17,])
array_2 = np.array([5.66667,0,4.25,4.75,6.08333,3.41667,6.33333,5.58333,6.33333,4.66667,8.5,10.0833,7.91667,9,8.83333,12.25,12.3,])
array_1_name = "xkcd comics published about physics"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only xkcd comics published about physics
Line chart for only Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet'
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: The Physics of Funny: Exploring the Correlation Between xkcd Comics and Queries for 'How to Apply a Tourniquet'

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!

Correlation ID: 1564 · Black Variable ID: 20020 · Red Variable ID: 1360


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: