about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,561 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO soybeans in Kansas became more plentiful, they inadvertently developed a smoky, grilled flavor profile. When these soybeans were processed and used as animal feed, the resulting meat had a distinct resemblance to the beloved hotdog taste. This unexpectedly led to a surge in top-quality, irresistible hotdogs, particularly favored by the reigning Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Though unbeknownst to the public, it seems the path to hotdog victory truly began in the sun-kissed fields of GMO soybean crops in Kansas.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant Discovery magazine cover featuring two contrasting scenes: In the foreground, a towering combine harvester emblazoned with "GMO" navigates a sun-drenched Kansas soybean field, with ripe soybeans being collected in abundance. In the background, a bustling Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition event unfolds, where the reigning champion ecstatically consumes a mountain of sizzling hotdogs, surrounded by cheering spectators. Capture the juxtaposition of the rural agricultural landscape and the lively competitive eating event, highlighting the essence of discovery and innovation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Celtic art A Discovery magazine cover image Concept art Magic realism
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast Kansas soybean field, a towering combine harvester with "GMO" painted on its side is busily collecting ripe soybeans under the hot summer sun. Nearby, at a bustling Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition event, the reigning champion is joyfully devouring a mountain of sizzling hotdogs, surrounded by cheering spectators.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a vast Kansas soybean field, a towering combine harvester with "GMO" painted on its side is busily collecting ripe soybeans under the hot summer sun. Nearby, at a bustling Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition event, the reigning champion is joyfully devouring a mountain of sizzling hotdogs, surrounded by cheering spectators. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vibrant Discovery magazine cover featuring two contrasting scenes: In the foreground, a towering combine harvester emblazoned with "GMO" navigates a sun-drenched Kansas soybean field, with ripe soybeans being collected in abundance. In the background, a bustling Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition event unfolds, where the reigning champion ecstatically consumes a mountain of sizzling hotdogs, surrounded by cheering spectators. Capture the juxtaposition of the rural agricultural landscape and the lively competitive eating event, highlighting the essence of discovery and innovation.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Kansas caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes

Journal of Applied Agricultural Absurdity

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in the state of Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the USDA and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 with p < 0.01 was revealed for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. The findings suggest a compelling association between the two seemingly disparate elements, sparking questions about the potential impact of GMOs on competitive eating habits. This research aims to stimulate further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and gastronomic feats, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in the state of Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the USDA and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 with p < 0.01 was revealed for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. The findings suggest a compelling association between the two seemingly disparate elements, sparking questions about the potential impact of GMOs on competitive eating habits. This research aims to stimulate further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and gastronomic feats, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The peculiar connection between genetically modified soybeans and the consumption of hotdogs by the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has sparked both curiosity and hunger pangs among researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. With the proliferation of GMO-loaded soybeans in the heartland of Kansas and the superhuman feats of hotdog consumption at the world-renowned competition, the need to investigate this seemingly unlikely correlation has become as urgent as the desire for the perfect mustard-to-hotdog ratio.

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of contentious debate, with proponents touting increased crop yields and resistance to pests, and opponents raising alarms about potential health and environmental impacts. On the other hand, competitive hotdog eating has its own mystique and allure, captivating audiences with its mix of athleticism, eccentricity, and sheer capacity for condiment-covered consumption. Thus, the confluence of GMO soybeans and hotdog eating champions presents a vast, unexplored landscape for scientific inquiry, akin to traipsing through a culinary cornfield.

In this research, we endeavor to uncover the hidden ties between these two seemingly dissonant worlds, using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the annals of Wikipedia. The revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708, coupled with the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, provides evidence of a robust relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere statistical noise or mustard stains on lab coats. This finding beckons the pressing question: how might the soybeans' genetic make-up be nudging the gluttonous gusto of competitive hotdog eaters towards ever greater feats of gastronomic triumph?

Delving into this enigmatic nexus betwixt GMO soybeans and hotdog heroics holds promise for shedding light on the interplay of agricultural innovation and voracious victualing, uncovering truths often hidden beneath the bun of conventional wisdom. As we embark on this scholarly adventure, the aroma of sizzling sausages mingles with the scent of soy fields, leading us to wonder about the unseen forces that bring these two worlds together, at least in the realm of correlation if not causation.

In this paper, we aim to cast light on this tantalizing topic, not only for the scholarly pursuit of science, but also for the relish of discovery and the frankfurter frolic that awaits at the intersection of soybeans and sausage sensations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in the state of Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the USDA and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 with p < 0.01 was revealed for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. The findings suggest a compelling association between the two seemingly disparate elements, sparking questions about the potential impact of GMOs on competitive eating habits. This research aims to stimulate further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and gastronomic feats, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The peculiar connection between genetically modified soybeans and the consumption of hotdogs by the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has sparked both curiosity and hunger pangs among researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. With the proliferation of GMO-loaded soybeans in the heartland of Kansas and the superhuman feats of hotdog consumption at the world-renowned competition, the need to investigate this seemingly unlikely correlation has become as urgent as the desire for the perfect mustard-to-hotdog ratio.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of contentious debate, with proponents touting increased crop yields and resistance to pests, and opponents raising alarms about potential health and environmental impacts. On the other hand, competitive hotdog eating has its own mystique and allure, captivating audiences with its mix of athleticism, eccentricity, and sheer capacity for condiment-covered consumption. Thus, the confluence of GMO soybeans and hotdog eating champions presents a vast, unexplored landscape for scientific inquiry, akin to traipsing through a culinary cornfield.
In this research, we endeavor to uncover the hidden ties between these two seemingly dissonant worlds, using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the annals of Wikipedia. The revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708, coupled with the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, provides evidence of a robust relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere statistical noise or mustard stains on lab coats. This finding beckons the pressing question: how might the soybeans' genetic make-up be nudging the gluttonous gusto of competitive hotdog eaters towards ever greater feats of gastronomic triumph?
Delving into this enigmatic nexus betwixt GMO soybeans and hotdog heroics holds promise for shedding light on the interplay of agricultural innovation and voracious victualing, uncovering truths often hidden beneath the bun of conventional wisdom. As we embark on this scholarly adventure, the aroma of sizzling sausages mingles with the scent of soy fields, leading us to wonder about the unseen forces that bring these two worlds together, at least in the realm of correlation if not causation.
In this paper, we aim to cast light on this tantalizing topic, not only for the scholarly pursuit of science, but also for the relish of discovery and the frankfurter frolic that awaits at the intersection of soybeans and sausage sensations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming and the voracious consumption of hotdogs by the renowned champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has stirred scholarly interest, culinary intrigue, and a craving for witticism. The early academic works by Smith (2010), Doe (2015), and Jones (2018) provided a foundation for the exploration of GMO cultivation and its effects on dietary preferences. However, the jocular juncture of GMO-loaded soybeans in Kansas and the hotdog habit of competitive eaters beckons a more lighthearted review, where dry academic prose meets the sizzle of a BBQ grill and the crunch of a perfectly crisped hotdog bun.

Serious scholarly works such as "The Impact of GMOs on Agricultural Practices" by Smith, delve into the potential consequences of genetically modified crops, albeit without considering their possible influence on the gustatory prowess of competitive eaters. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive analysis in "Genetically Modified Organisms: Environmental and Ethical Implications" offers valuable insights into the environmental and ethical concerns of GMOs, but regrettably neglects the potential link between GMO soybeans and the voracious appetites of competitive eating champions.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction with a culinary twist, books such as "GMOs and You: A Guide to Understanding Genetically Modified Foods" by Jane Farmer and "The Hotdog Diaries: From Mustard to Miracles" by Frankfurter Enthusiast provide substantial information about GMOs and the hotdog phenomenon. However, they fail to capture the delightful absurdity of examining a correlation between GMO soybeans and competitive hotdog consumption.

In the realm of fiction, works like "The Soybean Saga: Genetically Modified Adventures" by A. Novel and "Hotdogs and Heroes: A Culinary Quest" by E. Picure Book present imaginative tales that blend GMO science and gastronomic feats. While these literary works may tickle the taste buds of the imagination, they do little to address the empirical relationship between soybean genetics and competitive hotdog consumption.

Venturing into the whimsical world of animations and children's shows, the classic "Scooby-Doo" series and "Paw Patrol" provide glimpses of characters enjoying hotdogs, but offer no insights into the enigmatic connection between GMO soybeans and competitive hotdog eating. Therefore, while these shows may satisfy the appetite for animated entertainment, they leave the scholarly hunger for understanding the correlation unsated.

It is evident that the intersection of GMO soybeans and hotdog eating champions demands a blend of scientific inquiry and a dash of humor, much like the perfect hotdog topping. As this literature review demonstrates, there is a palpable dearth of scholarly attention paid to this peculiar correlation, leaving ample room for both serious investigation and playful engagement in the pursuit of knowledge. The alluring aroma of mystery grills the mind, and the quest for understanding beckons with the tantalizing sizzle of groundbreaking discovery, akin to the first bite of a perfectly grilled hotdog on a summer day.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in the state of Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the USDA and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 with p < 0.01 was revealed for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. The findings suggest a compelling association between the two seemingly disparate elements, sparking questions about the potential impact of GMOs on competitive eating habits. This research aims to stimulate further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and gastronomic feats, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The peculiar connection between genetically modified soybeans and the consumption of hotdogs by the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has sparked both curiosity and hunger pangs among researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. With the proliferation of GMO-loaded soybeans in the heartland of Kansas and the superhuman feats of hotdog consumption at the world-renowned competition, the need to investigate this seemingly unlikely correlation has become as urgent as the desire for the perfect mustard-to-hotdog ratio.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of contentious debate, with proponents touting increased crop yields and resistance to pests, and opponents raising alarms about potential health and environmental impacts. On the other hand, competitive hotdog eating has its own mystique and allure, captivating audiences with its mix of athleticism, eccentricity, and sheer capacity for condiment-covered consumption. Thus, the confluence of GMO soybeans and hotdog eating champions presents a vast, unexplored landscape for scientific inquiry, akin to traipsing through a culinary cornfield.
In this research, we endeavor to uncover the hidden ties between these two seemingly dissonant worlds, using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the annals of Wikipedia. The revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708, coupled with the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, provides evidence of a robust relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere statistical noise or mustard stains on lab coats. This finding beckons the pressing question: how might the soybeans' genetic make-up be nudging the gluttonous gusto of competitive hotdog eaters towards ever greater feats of gastronomic triumph?
Delving into this enigmatic nexus betwixt GMO soybeans and hotdog heroics holds promise for shedding light on the interplay of agricultural innovation and voracious victualing, uncovering truths often hidden beneath the bun of conventional wisdom. As we embark on this scholarly adventure, the aroma of sizzling sausages mingles with the scent of soy fields, leading us to wonder about the unseen forces that bring these two worlds together, at least in the realm of correlation if not causation.
In this paper, we aim to cast light on this tantalizing topic, not only for the scholarly pursuit of science, but also for the relish of discovery and the frankfurter frolic that awaits at the intersection of soybeans and sausage sensations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

For this study, a melange of data sources was harnessed, akin to creating a hearty hotdog topped with an array of condiments. Primarily, information regarding the production and utilization of genetically modified soybeans in Kansas was gleaned from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), providing a snapshot of the prevalence of GMOs in the heartland of the United States. The data, akin to a complex recipe, spanned the years 2000 to 2022, offering a panoramic view of the soybean landscape during this period.

To complement this savory dataset, the consumption patterns of hotdogs by celebrated champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition were extracted from the gastronomic archives of Wikipedia. The entwined tales of gluttonous glory and soybean sustenance were unfolded across the same time frame, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of the potential link between GMO-laden soybeans and hotdog indulgence.

The association between these seemingly unrelated variables, genetically modified soybean usage in Kansas and hotdog consumption by champions, was quantified using the pearson correlation coefficient, designated by the letter "r." This subtle statistical seasoning revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8534708, yielding a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship beyond the realm of random chance.

Embracing the spirit of culinary cross-pollination, various regression models were employed to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between GMO soybean usage and the champion hotdog consumption. The resulting models were scrutinized with the same zeal as a dedicated food critic, ensuring that the statistical flavors resonated with scientific precision.

Furthermore, auxiliary analyses were conducted to control for potential confounding variables, such as the weather conditions during the hotdog eating competitions, or the arrival of a new ketchup supplier. Sensitivity analyses, akin to tasting different batches of hotdog buns, were also implemented to confirm the robustness of the observed association, delivering a more nuanced understanding of the potential impact of GMO soybeans on the competitive eating prowess of hotdog heroes.

Ultimately, the interweaving of diverse data sources, statistical techniques, and analytical rigors allowed for a comprehensive exploration of the entwined destinies of genetically modified soybeans and the world of competitive hotdog consumption, providing a savory blend of science, gastronomy, and statistical gallantry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8534708, r-squared of 0.7284124, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in the state of Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the USDA and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 with p < 0.01 was revealed for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. The findings suggest a compelling association between the two seemingly disparate elements, sparking questions about the potential impact of GMOs on competitive eating habits. This research aims to stimulate further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and gastronomic feats, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The peculiar connection between genetically modified soybeans and the consumption of hotdogs by the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has sparked both curiosity and hunger pangs among researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. With the proliferation of GMO-loaded soybeans in the heartland of Kansas and the superhuman feats of hotdog consumption at the world-renowned competition, the need to investigate this seemingly unlikely correlation has become as urgent as the desire for the perfect mustard-to-hotdog ratio.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of contentious debate, with proponents touting increased crop yields and resistance to pests, and opponents raising alarms about potential health and environmental impacts. On the other hand, competitive hotdog eating has its own mystique and allure, captivating audiences with its mix of athleticism, eccentricity, and sheer capacity for condiment-covered consumption. Thus, the confluence of GMO soybeans and hotdog eating champions presents a vast, unexplored landscape for scientific inquiry, akin to traipsing through a culinary cornfield.
In this research, we endeavor to uncover the hidden ties between these two seemingly dissonant worlds, using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the annals of Wikipedia. The revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708, coupled with the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, provides evidence of a robust relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere statistical noise or mustard stains on lab coats. This finding beckons the pressing question: how might the soybeans' genetic make-up be nudging the gluttonous gusto of competitive hotdog eaters towards ever greater feats of gastronomic triumph?
Delving into this enigmatic nexus betwixt GMO soybeans and hotdog heroics holds promise for shedding light on the interplay of agricultural innovation and voracious victualing, uncovering truths often hidden beneath the bun of conventional wisdom. As we embark on this scholarly adventure, the aroma of sizzling sausages mingles with the scent of soy fields, leading us to wonder about the unseen forces that bring these two worlds together, at least in the realm of correlation if not causation.
In this paper, we aim to cast light on this tantalizing topic, not only for the scholarly pursuit of science, but also for the relish of discovery and the frankfurter frolic that awaits at the intersection of soybeans and sausage sensations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

An analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Wikipedia unveiled a startling correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 and an r-squared value of 0.7284124 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, evoking a sense of awe similar to that experienced upon witnessing the consumption of 75 hotdogs in 10 minutes.

The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, quells any doubts about the validity of this connection, reinforcing the notion that this association is not just a statistical fluke, but rather a profound bond that can no longer be ignored, much like the irresistible lure of a fully-loaded hotdog stand.

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot exhibits a clear and compelling trend, akin to the rapid disappearance of hotdogs during a competitive eating contest. The undeniable pattern revealed in the graph compels one to ponder the influence of genetically modified soybeans on the insatiable appetite of our hotdog-eating heroes, much like the way one ponders the perfect topping-to-dog ratio.

In conclusion, the results of this study provide compelling evidence of a correlation between the use of GMO-loaded soybeans in Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs, provoking further contemplation on the interplay between agricultural practices and gluttonous gastronomic achievements. These findings beckon further investigation into the potential impact of agricultural innovations on competitive eating habits, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations and inspiring a new appreciation for the science behind condiment application.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in the state of Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the USDA and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 with p < 0.01 was revealed for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. The findings suggest a compelling association between the two seemingly disparate elements, sparking questions about the potential impact of GMOs on competitive eating habits. This research aims to stimulate further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and gastronomic feats, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming and the voracious consumption of hotdogs by the renowned champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has stirred scholarly interest, culinary intrigue, and a craving for witticism. The early academic works by Smith (2010), Doe (2015), and Jones (2018) provided a foundation for the exploration of GMO cultivation and its effects on dietary preferences. However, the jocular juncture of GMO-loaded soybeans in Kansas and the hotdog habit of competitive eaters beckons a more lighthearted review, where dry academic prose meets the sizzle of a BBQ grill and the crunch of a perfectly crisped hotdog bun.
Serious scholarly works such as "The Impact of GMOs on Agricultural Practices" by Smith, delve into the potential consequences of genetically modified crops, albeit without considering their possible influence on the gustatory prowess of competitive eaters. Similarly, Doe's comprehensive analysis in "Genetically Modified Organisms: Environmental and Ethical Implications" offers valuable insights into the environmental and ethical concerns of GMOs, but regrettably neglects the potential link between GMO soybeans and the voracious appetites of competitive eating champions.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction with a culinary twist, books such as "GMOs and You: A Guide to Understanding Genetically Modified Foods" by Jane Farmer and "The Hotdog Diaries: From Mustard to Miracles" by Frankfurter Enthusiast provide substantial information about GMOs and the hotdog phenomenon. However, they fail to capture the delightful absurdity of examining a correlation between GMO soybeans and competitive hotdog consumption.
In the realm of fiction, works like "The Soybean Saga: Genetically Modified Adventures" by A. Novel and "Hotdogs and Heroes: A Culinary Quest" by E. Picure Book present imaginative tales that blend GMO science and gastronomic feats. While these literary works may tickle the taste buds of the imagination, they do little to address the empirical relationship between soybean genetics and competitive hotdog consumption.
Venturing into the whimsical world of animations and children's shows, the classic "Scooby-Doo" series and "Paw Patrol" provide glimpses of characters enjoying hotdogs, but offer no insights into the enigmatic connection between GMO soybeans and competitive hotdog eating. Therefore, while these shows may satisfy the appetite for animated entertainment, they leave the scholarly hunger for understanding the correlation unsated.
It is evident that the intersection of GMO soybeans and hotdog eating champions demands a blend of scientific inquiry and a dash of humor, much like the perfect hotdog topping. As this literature review demonstrates, there is a palpable dearth of scholarly attention paid to this peculiar correlation, leaving ample room for both serious investigation and playful engagement in the pursuit of knowledge. The alluring aroma of mystery grills the mind, and the quest for understanding beckons with the tantalizing sizzle of groundbreaking discovery, akin to the first bite of a perfectly grilled hotdog on a summer day.

[[RESULTS]]
An analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Wikipedia unveiled a startling correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 and an r-squared value of 0.7284124 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, evoking a sense of awe similar to that experienced upon witnessing the consumption of 75 hotdogs in 10 minutes.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, quells any doubts about the validity of this connection, reinforcing the notion that this association is not just a statistical fluke, but rather a profound bond that can no longer be ignored, much like the irresistible lure of a fully-loaded hotdog stand.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot exhibits a clear and compelling trend, akin to the rapid disappearance of hotdogs during a competitive eating contest. The undeniable pattern revealed in the graph compels one to ponder the influence of genetically modified soybeans on the insatiable appetite of our hotdog-eating heroes, much like the way one ponders the perfect topping-to-dog ratio.
In conclusion, the results of this study provide compelling evidence of a correlation between the use of GMO-loaded soybeans in Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs, provoking further contemplation on the interplay between agricultural practices and gluttonous gastronomic achievements. These findings beckon further investigation into the potential impact of agricultural innovations on competitive eating habits, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations and inspiring a new appreciation for the science behind condiment application.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The present study has unveiled a tantalizing connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in Kansas and the indulgence in copious amounts of hotdogs by the esteemed victors of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, imbuing this research with an allure akin to the aroma of a sizzling grill on a summer afternoon.

Our findings not only corroborate earlier works investigating the influence of GMOs on dietary habits but also add a flavorful twist by establishing a link with the competitive consumption of frankfurters. The correlation coefficient, akin to the perfect blend of mustard and relish, provides statistically robust evidence of the profound bond between these seemingly incongruent elements, sustaining the spicy argument that GMO soybeans exude an unseen influence on the gustatory prowess of our hotdog-eating heroes.

Building upon the scholarly works of Smith, Doe, and Jones, who solemnly paved the way for the exploration of GMO cultivation, our study injects a dash of lightheartedness into the otherwise earnest discourse, much like the splash of ketchup on a hotdog, by uncovering a correlation that rivals the dizzying spinning of a hotdog stand's condiment carousel.

In light of the results, it is evident that the intersection of GMO-loaded soybeans and competitive hotdog consumption demands both scientific scrutiny and a sprinkle of mirth, much like the marriage of empirical inquiry and culinary caprice. Our study's statistical significance, analogous to the unanimous agreement on the superiority of grilled over boiled franks, underscores the robustness of the association, quelling any doubts and seasoning the debate with a hint of incredulity.

The compelling trends depicted in the scatterplot not only illuminate the strong positive relationship between GMO soybeans and hotdog consumption but also evoke a sense of culinary wonder akin to the perfect balance of flavors in a well-crafted bunless creation. Just as a well-grilled sausage beckons with an irresistible aroma, our findings beckon further investigation into the potential impact of agricultural innovations on competitive eating habits, offering a feast of possibilities for future research.

In conclusion, the remarkable correlation unveiled by this study does more than just tantalize the taste buds of scientific curiosity; it prompts a reevaluation of the covert connections between agricultural practices and gluttonous gastronomic achievements. As we ponder the enigmatic influence of GMOs on the voracious appetites of our hotdog-eating champions, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge, much like the quest for the perfect condiment, is a delightful blend of scholarship and gastronomy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Kansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in the state of Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the USDA and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 with p < 0.01 was revealed for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. The findings suggest a compelling association between the two seemingly disparate elements, sparking questions about the potential impact of GMOs on competitive eating habits. This research aims to stimulate further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and gastronomic feats, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The peculiar connection between genetically modified soybeans and the consumption of hotdogs by the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has sparked both curiosity and hunger pangs among researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. With the proliferation of GMO-loaded soybeans in the heartland of Kansas and the superhuman feats of hotdog consumption at the world-renowned competition, the need to investigate this seemingly unlikely correlation has become as urgent as the desire for the perfect mustard-to-hotdog ratio.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of contentious debate, with proponents touting increased crop yields and resistance to pests, and opponents raising alarms about potential health and environmental impacts. On the other hand, competitive hotdog eating has its own mystique and allure, captivating audiences with its mix of athleticism, eccentricity, and sheer capacity for condiment-covered consumption. Thus, the confluence of GMO soybeans and hotdog eating champions presents a vast, unexplored landscape for scientific inquiry, akin to traipsing through a culinary cornfield.
In this research, we endeavor to uncover the hidden ties between these two seemingly dissonant worlds, using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the annals of Wikipedia. The revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708, coupled with the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, provides evidence of a robust relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere statistical noise or mustard stains on lab coats. This finding beckons the pressing question: how might the soybeans' genetic make-up be nudging the gluttonous gusto of competitive hotdog eaters towards ever greater feats of gastronomic triumph?
Delving into this enigmatic nexus betwixt GMO soybeans and hotdog heroics holds promise for shedding light on the interplay of agricultural innovation and voracious victualing, uncovering truths often hidden beneath the bun of conventional wisdom. As we embark on this scholarly adventure, the aroma of sizzling sausages mingles with the scent of soy fields, leading us to wonder about the unseen forces that bring these two worlds together, at least in the realm of correlation if not causation.
In this paper, we aim to cast light on this tantalizing topic, not only for the scholarly pursuit of science, but also for the relish of discovery and the frankfurter frolic that awaits at the intersection of soybeans and sausage sensations.

[[RESULTS]]
An analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Wikipedia unveiled a startling correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 and an r-squared value of 0.7284124 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, evoking a sense of awe similar to that experienced upon witnessing the consumption of 75 hotdogs in 10 minutes.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, quells any doubts about the validity of this connection, reinforcing the notion that this association is not just a statistical fluke, but rather a profound bond that can no longer be ignored, much like the irresistible lure of a fully-loaded hotdog stand.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot exhibits a clear and compelling trend, akin to the rapid disappearance of hotdogs during a competitive eating contest. The undeniable pattern revealed in the graph compels one to ponder the influence of genetically modified soybeans on the insatiable appetite of our hotdog-eating heroes, much like the way one ponders the perfect topping-to-dog ratio.
In conclusion, the results of this study provide compelling evidence of a correlation between the use of GMO-loaded soybeans in Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs, provoking further contemplation on the interplay between agricultural practices and gluttonous gastronomic achievements. These findings beckon further investigation into the potential impact of agricultural innovations on competitive eating habits, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations and inspiring a new appreciation for the science behind condiment application.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study leaf us with a tantalizing taste of the potential interplay between GMO-loaded soybeans in Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The statistically significant correlation coefficient and p-value suggest a strong relationship that isn't just a statistical fluke but rather a beefy bond, much like the one between a hotdog and a bun. This research has uncovered a connection that is more than just a saucy statistical anomaly, highlighting the need to further probe into the soybean-hotdog nexus.

The allure of competitive hotdog eating and the mystique of genetically modified organisms have converged in a manner that rivals the merging of ketchup and mustard on a perfectly grilled frankfurter. The tantalizing question of how genetically modified soybeans may be nudging the titans of hotdog consumption towards ever greater feats of gastronomic triumph calls for further scrutiny, like the meticulous examination of the ideal hotdog toppings-to-dog ratio.

As we savor the findings of this study, it becomes clear that no further research is needed in this area, for we have bunned out all the possible avenues of investigation. The link between GMO-loaded soybeans in Kansas and the hotdog habit of hot dog-eating heroes has been thoroughly mustard, leaving no room for further relish in this particular line of inquiry. Future research may be better served by turning attention to the mysteries of the pickle jar or the enigma of the hamburger's bun-to-patty ratio. So let's savor this discovery while we can, like the perfect bite of a flawlessly prepared hotdog.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Applied Agricultural Absurdity


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Culinary Agriculture and Biotechnology Integration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Linking GMO-loaded Soybeans in Kansas to the Hotdog Habit of Hot Dog-Eating Heroes with an abstract of The present study investigates the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean farming in the state of Kansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the USDA and Wikipedia, a correlation coefficient of 0.8534708 with p < 0.01 was revealed for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. The findings suggest a compelling association between the two seemingly disparate elements, sparking questions about the potential impact of GMOs on competitive eating habits. This research aims to stimulate further exploration into the intersection of agricultural practices and gastronomic feats, shedding light on the covert connections between soybeans and sausage sensations.

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans Kansas, hotdog consumption hotdog-eating champions, genetically modified organisms impact on competitive eating, soybean farming correlation with hotdog eating, GMOs and gastronomic habits, association between GMO soybeans and hotdog consumption, link between GMOs in soybeans and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, agricultural practices and competitive eating habits

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Kansas
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Kansas that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Kansas

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.8534708 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7284124 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Kansas) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.3E-7. 0.0000002258025564549742200000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 2.3E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,428,648 random variables You don't actually need 4 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Kansas (GMO soybeans %)6680838787908592959495969493949695949595979696
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)255050.544.553.334953.7566596854626869616270727471757663




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([66,80,83,87,87,90,85,92,95,94,95,96,94,93,94,96,95,94,95,95,97,96,96,])
array_2 = np.array([25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,63,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1561 · Black Variable ID: 817 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0