about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,556 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The soybeans started expressing themselves in ways no one could comprehend, leaving everyone in a state of agricultural confusion. The GMO soybeans were just too much for people to handle, leading to a widespread feeling of botanic bewilderment. The soybeans' inner turmoil was reflected in the collective exasperation of internet users, creating a crop of memes and jokes that just couldn't be odder. It was a situation that even the most seasoned farmers couldn't crop with, and soon the entire state of Illinois found itself in a soy-based existential crisis.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] A vibrant and vast soybean field in Illinois stretches to the horizon under the warm sunlight. A farmer, illuminated by the golden rays, diligently plants genetically modified soybean seeds, casting a long shadow over the fertile earth. In the foreground, a group of young adults, with furrowed brows and intense expressions, sit amidst the greenery, engrossed on their smartphones as they fervently search "i cant even" on Google, contrasting the serene agricultural setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo Art nouveau Voxel art Concept art Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling soybean field in Illinois, a farmer is planting genetically modified soybean seeds. Meanwhile, nearby, a group of young adults sit together on their smartphones, furrowing their brows as they furiously search "i cant even" on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling soybean field in Illinois, a farmer is planting genetically modified soybean seeds. Meanwhile, nearby, a group of young adults sit together on their smartphones, furrowing their brows as they furiously search "i cant even" on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] A vibrant and vast soybean field in Illinois stretches to the horizon under the warm sunlight. A farmer, illuminated by the golden rays, diligently plants genetically modified soybean seeds, casting a long shadow over the fertile earth. In the foreground, a group of young adults, with furrowed brows and intense expressions, sit amidst the greenery, engrossed on their smartphones as they fervently search "i cant even" on Google, contrasting the serene agricultural setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Illinois caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the curious link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i can't even'. With a pun-tastic twinkle in our eyes, we delved into USDA and Google Trends data spanning the years 2004 to 2022 and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, eliciting both a scientific nod and a dad-approved grin.

Our study presents evidence that as the use of GMO soybeans increased in Illinois, so did the occurrence of 'i can't even' searches on Google. This unexpected correspondence gives rise to a multitude of interpretations, prompting us to explore the sociocultural implications and agricultural influences on the emotional expressions of internet users. Indeed, the connection between biotechnology and digital exasperation is not only statistically significant but also throws light on the intertwined complexities of modern life.

In conclusion, as we uncover this curious relationship, we encourage further investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and online colloquialisms. Furthermore, we invite academic discourse regarding the role of soybeans in the emotional landscape of the digital age, while serving up a side of puns that could make even the most seasoned researcher chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the curious link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i can't even'. With a pun-tastic twinkle in our eyes, we delved into USDA and Google Trends data spanning the years 2004 to 2022 and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, eliciting both a scientific nod and a dad-approved grin.

Our study presents evidence that as the use of GMO soybeans increased in Illinois, so did the occurrence of 'i can't even' searches on Google. This unexpected correspondence gives rise to a multitude of interpretations, prompting us to explore the sociocultural implications and agricultural influences on the emotional expressions of internet users. Indeed, the connection between biotechnology and digital exasperation is not only statistically significant but also throws light on the intertwined complexities of modern life.

In conclusion, as we uncover this curious relationship, we encourage further investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and online colloquialisms. Furthermore, we invite academic discourse regarding the role of soybeans in the emotional landscape of the digital age, while serving up a side of puns that could make even the most seasoned researcher chuckle.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of agricultural biotechnology often cultivates a kaleidoscope of debates, but rarely does it elicit an exasperated "I can't even." However, in the realm of curious scientific inquiry, no stone – or soybean, for that matter – is left unturned. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Illinois soybeans and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches.

As the saying goes, "the proof is in the pudding, but the GMO's in the soybeans." Indeed, our research hinged on delving into USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends data reflecting the moods of the internet. The statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, making statisticians swoon and dads do a knowing head nod.

The robust statistical relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Illinois and the prevalence of 'I can't even' searches on Google gives rise to a bounty of interpretations, prompting us to plow the fertile field of sociocultural implications and agronomic influences on online expressions of frustration. It seems that the emotional landscape of the digital age is not merely a field of dreams but also a field of beans, genetically modified, of course.

In conclusion, as we reap the harvest of this unexpected connection, we not only fertilize the soil of scientific inquiry but also plant the seeds of further investigation. We invite fellow researchers to join us in sowing the fields of interdisciplinary inquiry, bridging the gap between agricultural practices and internet vernacular, and perhaps even cracking a few soybean-themed dad jokes along the way. After all, in the world of research, sometimes you've just got to soy it!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the curious link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i can't even'. With a pun-tastic twinkle in our eyes, we delved into USDA and Google Trends data spanning the years 2004 to 2022 and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, eliciting both a scientific nod and a dad-approved grin.

Our study presents evidence that as the use of GMO soybeans increased in Illinois, so did the occurrence of 'i can't even' searches on Google. This unexpected correspondence gives rise to a multitude of interpretations, prompting us to explore the sociocultural implications and agricultural influences on the emotional expressions of internet users. Indeed, the connection between biotechnology and digital exasperation is not only statistically significant but also throws light on the intertwined complexities of modern life.

In conclusion, as we uncover this curious relationship, we encourage further investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and online colloquialisms. Furthermore, we invite academic discourse regarding the role of soybeans in the emotional landscape of the digital age, while serving up a side of puns that could make even the most seasoned researcher chuckle.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology often cultivates a kaleidoscope of debates, but rarely does it elicit an exasperated "I can't even." However, in the realm of curious scientific inquiry, no stone – or soybean, for that matter – is left unturned. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Illinois soybeans and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches.
As the saying goes, "the proof is in the pudding, but the GMO's in the soybeans." Indeed, our research hinged on delving into USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends data reflecting the moods of the internet. The statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, making statisticians swoon and dads do a knowing head nod.
The robust statistical relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Illinois and the prevalence of 'I can't even' searches on Google gives rise to a bounty of interpretations, prompting us to plow the fertile field of sociocultural implications and agronomic influences on online expressions of frustration. It seems that the emotional landscape of the digital age is not merely a field of dreams but also a field of beans, genetically modified, of course.
In conclusion, as we reap the harvest of this unexpected connection, we not only fertilize the soil of scientific inquiry but also plant the seeds of further investigation. We invite fellow researchers to join us in sowing the fields of interdisciplinary inquiry, bridging the gap between agricultural practices and internet vernacular, and perhaps even cracking a few soybean-themed dad jokes along the way. After all, in the world of research, sometimes you've just got to soy it!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have shed light on the intersection of agricultural practices and societal trends, but none have ventured into the realm of internet colloquialisms with the vigor and vigoroum of the current investigation. Smith (2010) examines the impact of GMO soybean cultivation on agricultural output, while Doe (2015) delves into the societal attitudes toward genetically modified organisms. Jones (2018) contributes a comprehensive analysis of Google search trends related to popular phrases.

In "Soybeans & Society," the authors expound upon the agricultural and cultural significance of soybean cultivation, touching upon the potential implications of biotechnological advancements on the emotional landscape of society. "GMOs: A Comprehensive Guide" presents a nuanced exploration of the proclivities and practices associated with genetically modified organisms, laying the groundwork for a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the impact of biotechnology on human expression.

Moving from the factual to the fictional, "The Soybean Saga" and "Genetically Modified Mischief" offer compelling narratives that may hold indirect insights into the interplay between soybean cultivation and the digital vernacular. While these works may not offer empirical evidence, they do serve as a reminder that the realm of scientific inquiry is not devoid of imaginative inspiration.

Furthermore, anecdotal evidence gleaned from social media platforms has hinted at a potential link between GMO soybean cultivation and online exasperation. A tweet by @SoybeanSkeptic proclaiming, "GMO soybeans got me like 'I can't even' #harvestwoes" reflects a sentiment that resonates with the statistical observations made in this paper. Similarly, a Reddit post in r/AgricultureHumor humorously juxtaposes the frustrations of soybean farming with online expressions of exasperation, underscoring the potential interconnectedness between the agricultural and digital spheres.

In sum, while the existing literature provides a springboard for our investigation, it is the combination of empirical data, literary inspiration, and social media musings that propels our quest to untangle the intriguing relationship between GMO soybean use in Illinois and 'I can't even' Google searches.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the curious link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i can't even'. With a pun-tastic twinkle in our eyes, we delved into USDA and Google Trends data spanning the years 2004 to 2022 and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, eliciting both a scientific nod and a dad-approved grin.

Our study presents evidence that as the use of GMO soybeans increased in Illinois, so did the occurrence of 'i can't even' searches on Google. This unexpected correspondence gives rise to a multitude of interpretations, prompting us to explore the sociocultural implications and agricultural influences on the emotional expressions of internet users. Indeed, the connection between biotechnology and digital exasperation is not only statistically significant but also throws light on the intertwined complexities of modern life.

In conclusion, as we uncover this curious relationship, we encourage further investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and online colloquialisms. Furthermore, we invite academic discourse regarding the role of soybeans in the emotional landscape of the digital age, while serving up a side of puns that could make even the most seasoned researcher chuckle.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology often cultivates a kaleidoscope of debates, but rarely does it elicit an exasperated "I can't even." However, in the realm of curious scientific inquiry, no stone – or soybean, for that matter – is left unturned. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Illinois soybeans and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches.
As the saying goes, "the proof is in the pudding, but the GMO's in the soybeans." Indeed, our research hinged on delving into USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends data reflecting the moods of the internet. The statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, making statisticians swoon and dads do a knowing head nod.
The robust statistical relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Illinois and the prevalence of 'I can't even' searches on Google gives rise to a bounty of interpretations, prompting us to plow the fertile field of sociocultural implications and agronomic influences on online expressions of frustration. It seems that the emotional landscape of the digital age is not merely a field of dreams but also a field of beans, genetically modified, of course.
In conclusion, as we reap the harvest of this unexpected connection, we not only fertilize the soil of scientific inquiry but also plant the seeds of further investigation. We invite fellow researchers to join us in sowing the fields of interdisciplinary inquiry, bridging the gap between agricultural practices and internet vernacular, and perhaps even cracking a few soybean-themed dad jokes along the way. After all, in the world of research, sometimes you've just got to soy it!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study involved the aggregation and analysis of data from multiple sources in order to explore the correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. The primary sources of data included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for information on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends for data on search trends from 2004 to 2022.

To begin, the data on the adoption of GMO soybeans in Illinois was collected and organized, utilizing a combination of web scraping, text mining, and manual extraction to ensure comprehensive coverage. This process was not without its challenges, akin to navigating a maze of soybean fields. Once compiled, the data was meticulously cleaned and formatted, with outliers identified and removed to prevent the statistical analysis from becoming a GMO-mess.

Moving on to the Google Trends data, the frequency of 'I can't even' searches was obtained and cross-referenced with the timeline of GMO soybean adoption in Illinois. The utilization of Google Trends data involved taming the wild terrain of internet search queries, akin to tracking elusive prey in the scientific wilderness.

The statistical analysis was conducted using advanced data analytics software, with a focus on establishing the correlation between the two variables. Regression analysis was performed to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship, allowing us to uncover the delightful correlation coefficient of 0.8959588. With such a robust correlation, one might say we hit the jackpot, or should I say, the soy-pot?

Furthermore, a Granger causality test was conducted to investigate the potential causal relationship between GMO soybean adoption and 'I can't even' searches. The results of this analysis allowed us to plow deeper into the understanding of the temporal dynamics between the variables, revealing a not-so-bean-counting relationship.

In summary, the methodology employed in this research endeavored to cultivate a rigorous approach to data collection, preparation, and statistical analysis, akin to tending to a field of scientific inquiry. The combination of methodological precision and scientific curiosity allowed us to uncover the statistically significant relationship between GMO soybean adoption and 'I can't even' searches, sowing the seeds for further interdisciplinary exploration and, surely, a crop of soybean-themed dad jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8959588, r-squared of 0.8027421, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the curious link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i can't even'. With a pun-tastic twinkle in our eyes, we delved into USDA and Google Trends data spanning the years 2004 to 2022 and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, eliciting both a scientific nod and a dad-approved grin.

Our study presents evidence that as the use of GMO soybeans increased in Illinois, so did the occurrence of 'i can't even' searches on Google. This unexpected correspondence gives rise to a multitude of interpretations, prompting us to explore the sociocultural implications and agricultural influences on the emotional expressions of internet users. Indeed, the connection between biotechnology and digital exasperation is not only statistically significant but also throws light on the intertwined complexities of modern life.

In conclusion, as we uncover this curious relationship, we encourage further investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and online colloquialisms. Furthermore, we invite academic discourse regarding the role of soybeans in the emotional landscape of the digital age, while serving up a side of puns that could make even the most seasoned researcher chuckle.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology often cultivates a kaleidoscope of debates, but rarely does it elicit an exasperated "I can't even." However, in the realm of curious scientific inquiry, no stone – or soybean, for that matter – is left unturned. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Illinois soybeans and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches.
As the saying goes, "the proof is in the pudding, but the GMO's in the soybeans." Indeed, our research hinged on delving into USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends data reflecting the moods of the internet. The statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, making statisticians swoon and dads do a knowing head nod.
The robust statistical relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Illinois and the prevalence of 'I can't even' searches on Google gives rise to a bounty of interpretations, prompting us to plow the fertile field of sociocultural implications and agronomic influences on online expressions of frustration. It seems that the emotional landscape of the digital age is not merely a field of dreams but also a field of beans, genetically modified, of course.
In conclusion, as we reap the harvest of this unexpected connection, we not only fertilize the soil of scientific inquiry but also plant the seeds of further investigation. We invite fellow researchers to join us in sowing the fields of interdisciplinary inquiry, bridging the gap between agricultural practices and internet vernacular, and perhaps even cracking a few soybean-themed dad jokes along the way. After all, in the world of research, sometimes you've just got to soy it!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and an r-squared value of 0.8027421, our findings suggest a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's almost as if soybeans were telling a joke and internet users just couldn't even!

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and supports the assertion that the correlation is statistically significant. This result indicates that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is exceedingly low, much like the odds of a successful dad joke. Speaking of which, have you heard about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? Despite this impressive finding, we tread cautiously and acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation, but it does inspire a good chuckle.

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the striking correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. The points hug the trend line so closely, it's as if they are holding hands and skipping through a field of, you guessed it, soybeans. This visual representation reinforces the strength of the relationship and amplifies the intrigue surrounding this unexpected phenomenon.

Our study contributes to the broader conversation about the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions, by planting the seeds of inquiry and nurturing the soil of interdisciplinary research. As we continue to cultivate our understanding of this peculiar correlation, we invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring the nuanced confluence of biotechnology and exasperated internet discourse, all while serving up a side of soybean-themed puns that are ripe for the picking. It's not every day that research findings can make you both scratch your head and crack a smile.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the curious link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i can't even'. With a pun-tastic twinkle in our eyes, we delved into USDA and Google Trends data spanning the years 2004 to 2022 and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, eliciting both a scientific nod and a dad-approved grin.

Our study presents evidence that as the use of GMO soybeans increased in Illinois, so did the occurrence of 'i can't even' searches on Google. This unexpected correspondence gives rise to a multitude of interpretations, prompting us to explore the sociocultural implications and agricultural influences on the emotional expressions of internet users. Indeed, the connection between biotechnology and digital exasperation is not only statistically significant but also throws light on the intertwined complexities of modern life.

In conclusion, as we uncover this curious relationship, we encourage further investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and online colloquialisms. Furthermore, we invite academic discourse regarding the role of soybeans in the emotional landscape of the digital age, while serving up a side of puns that could make even the most seasoned researcher chuckle.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have shed light on the intersection of agricultural practices and societal trends, but none have ventured into the realm of internet colloquialisms with the vigor and vigoroum of the current investigation. Smith (2010) examines the impact of GMO soybean cultivation on agricultural output, while Doe (2015) delves into the societal attitudes toward genetically modified organisms. Jones (2018) contributes a comprehensive analysis of Google search trends related to popular phrases.
In "Soybeans & Society," the authors expound upon the agricultural and cultural significance of soybean cultivation, touching upon the potential implications of biotechnological advancements on the emotional landscape of society. "GMOs: A Comprehensive Guide" presents a nuanced exploration of the proclivities and practices associated with genetically modified organisms, laying the groundwork for a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the impact of biotechnology on human expression.
Moving from the factual to the fictional, "The Soybean Saga" and "Genetically Modified Mischief" offer compelling narratives that may hold indirect insights into the interplay between soybean cultivation and the digital vernacular. While these works may not offer empirical evidence, they do serve as a reminder that the realm of scientific inquiry is not devoid of imaginative inspiration.
Furthermore, anecdotal evidence gleaned from social media platforms has hinted at a potential link between GMO soybean cultivation and online exasperation. A tweet by @SoybeanSkeptic proclaiming, "GMO soybeans got me like 'I can't even' #harvestwoes" reflects a sentiment that resonates with the statistical observations made in this paper. Similarly, a Reddit post in r/AgricultureHumor humorously juxtaposes the frustrations of soybean farming with online expressions of exasperation, underscoring the potential interconnectedness between the agricultural and digital spheres.
In sum, while the existing literature provides a springboard for our investigation, it is the combination of empirical data, literary inspiration, and social media musings that propels our quest to untangle the intriguing relationship between GMO soybean use in Illinois and 'I can't even' Google searches.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and an r-squared value of 0.8027421, our findings suggest a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's almost as if soybeans were telling a joke and internet users just couldn't even!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and supports the assertion that the correlation is statistically significant. This result indicates that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is exceedingly low, much like the odds of a successful dad joke. Speaking of which, have you heard about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? Despite this impressive finding, we tread cautiously and acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation, but it does inspire a good chuckle.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the striking correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. The points hug the trend line so closely, it's as if they are holding hands and skipping through a field of, you guessed it, soybeans. This visual representation reinforces the strength of the relationship and amplifies the intrigue surrounding this unexpected phenomenon.
Our study contributes to the broader conversation about the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions, by planting the seeds of inquiry and nurturing the soil of interdisciplinary research. As we continue to cultivate our understanding of this peculiar correlation, we invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring the nuanced confluence of biotechnology and exasperated internet discourse, all while serving up a side of soybean-themed puns that are ripe for the picking. It's not every day that research findings can make you both scratch your head and crack a smile.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches supports and extends existing literature on the intersection of agricultural practices and societal trends. Our findings align with Smith's (2010) observations on the impact of GMO soybean cultivation on agricultural output, and Doe's (2015) exploration of societal attitudes toward genetically modified organisms. The high correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, akin to a perfectly timed punchline, underscores the strength of the relationship between these variables and contributes to the growing body of evidence on the interconnectedness of biotechnology and human expression. This unexpected correlation is as unexpected as a statistician's favorite knock-knock joke, and it emphasizes the need for further exploration into the sociocultural implications of agricultural practices.

Our statistically significant results lend empirical support to the anecdotal evidence gleaned from social media platforms, amplifying the musings of @SoybeanSkeptic and the sentiments expressed within r/AgricultureHumor. The convergence of empirical data and online discourse hints at a potential symbiotic relationship between digital exasperation and the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans. These findings emphasize that the realm of scientific inquiry is not devoid of imaginative inspiration, much like a good dad joke hidden within a complex statistical analysis.

As we tiptoe cautiously in interpreting these results, we must acknowledge the limitations of our study. While our findings highlight a strong correlation, the nature of our data precludes assertions of causation, leaving the age-old question of "chicken or egg" unresolved. Despite this, the strength of the relationship prompts additional exploration into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected connection. It's almost as if soybeans were whispering jokes into the wind, eliciting a collective digital exasperation from internet users.

In sum, our research has unearthed a compelling link between GMO soybean use in Illinois and 'I can't even' Google searches, underscoring the potential impact of agricultural practices on the emotional expressions of internet users. This unexpected relationship mirrors the unexpected humor in statistics and research, bringing a touch of levity to the scholarly discourse while planting the seeds for future investigation. As we conclude this discussion, we invite fellow researchers to join us in delving deeper into the multidisciplinary tapestry of biotechnology, digital vernacular, and human emotions, and the unexpected dad jokes hidden within the threads of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the curious link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i can't even'. With a pun-tastic twinkle in our eyes, we delved into USDA and Google Trends data spanning the years 2004 to 2022 and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, eliciting both a scientific nod and a dad-approved grin.

Our study presents evidence that as the use of GMO soybeans increased in Illinois, so did the occurrence of 'i can't even' searches on Google. This unexpected correspondence gives rise to a multitude of interpretations, prompting us to explore the sociocultural implications and agricultural influences on the emotional expressions of internet users. Indeed, the connection between biotechnology and digital exasperation is not only statistically significant but also throws light on the intertwined complexities of modern life.

In conclusion, as we uncover this curious relationship, we encourage further investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and online colloquialisms. Furthermore, we invite academic discourse regarding the role of soybeans in the emotional landscape of the digital age, while serving up a side of puns that could make even the most seasoned researcher chuckle.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology often cultivates a kaleidoscope of debates, but rarely does it elicit an exasperated "I can't even." However, in the realm of curious scientific inquiry, no stone – or soybean, for that matter – is left unturned. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Illinois soybeans and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches.
As the saying goes, "the proof is in the pudding, but the GMO's in the soybeans." Indeed, our research hinged on delving into USDA data on GMO soybean adoption and Google Trends data reflecting the moods of the internet. The statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, making statisticians swoon and dads do a knowing head nod.
The robust statistical relationship between the use of GMO soybeans in Illinois and the prevalence of 'I can't even' searches on Google gives rise to a bounty of interpretations, prompting us to plow the fertile field of sociocultural implications and agronomic influences on online expressions of frustration. It seems that the emotional landscape of the digital age is not merely a field of dreams but also a field of beans, genetically modified, of course.
In conclusion, as we reap the harvest of this unexpected connection, we not only fertilize the soil of scientific inquiry but also plant the seeds of further investigation. We invite fellow researchers to join us in sowing the fields of interdisciplinary inquiry, bridging the gap between agricultural practices and internet vernacular, and perhaps even cracking a few soybean-themed dad jokes along the way. After all, in the world of research, sometimes you've just got to soy it!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and an r-squared value of 0.8027421, our findings suggest a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's almost as if soybeans were telling a joke and internet users just couldn't even!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and supports the assertion that the correlation is statistically significant. This result indicates that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is exceedingly low, much like the odds of a successful dad joke. Speaking of which, have you heard about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? Despite this impressive finding, we tread cautiously and acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation, but it does inspire a good chuckle.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the striking correlation between the use of GMO soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. The points hug the trend line so closely, it's as if they are holding hands and skipping through a field of, you guessed it, soybeans. This visual representation reinforces the strength of the relationship and amplifies the intrigue surrounding this unexpected phenomenon.
Our study contributes to the broader conversation about the intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions, by planting the seeds of inquiry and nurturing the soil of interdisciplinary research. As we continue to cultivate our understanding of this peculiar correlation, we invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring the nuanced confluence of biotechnology and exasperated internet discourse, all while serving up a side of soybean-themed puns that are ripe for the picking. It's not every day that research findings can make you both scratch your head and crack a smile.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In cultivating this research, we have unearthed a kernel of truth in the correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. The statistical evidence sprouts from a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01, proving that the relationship is as robust as a well-fertilized soybean field. It's as if the soybeans are whispering, “I'm no ordinary crop. I'm edamame-zing!”

Our findings not only lay the groundwork for acknowledging the unexpected association between agricultural practices and digital exasperation but also sow the seeds for a lively discussion concerning the emotional landscape of the digital age. It seems that soybeans are not only a staple of the agricultural world but also have a starring role in the theater of internet vernacular. Soybeans: 1, skeptics: bean there, done that.

The scatterplot visually captures the strong correlation, much like a snapshot of soybeans and frustrating Google searches engaged in a tango of statistical significance. The points on the plot hug the trend line so closely, it's like a scientific embrace between two unexpected bedfellows. Talk about a statistical romance!

In conclusion, our study brings to light an unexpected convergence of otherwise unrelated entities. To put it simply, in the world of research, sometimes you've just got to soy it – and in this case, we did. Further research in this area is not necessary. The puns are just too corny to handle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Millennial Behavior Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Soybeans to Sighing: The Relationship Between GMO Use in Illinois and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches with an abstract of In this research paper, we explore the curious link between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i can't even'. With a pun-tastic twinkle in our eyes, we delved into USDA and Google Trends data spanning the years 2004 to 2022 and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with a p-value less than 0.01, eliciting both a scientific nod and a dad-approved grin.
Our study presents evidence that as the use of GMO soybeans increased in Illinois, so did the occurrence of 'i can't even' searches on Google. This unexpected correspondence gives rise to a multitude of interpretations, prompting us to explore the sociocultural implications and agricultural influences on the emotional expressions of internet users. Indeed, the connection between biotechnology and digital exasperation is not only statistically significant but also throws light on the intertwined complexities of modern life.
In conclusion, as we uncover this curious relationship, we encourage further investigation into the intersection of agricultural practices and online colloquialisms. Furthermore, we invite academic discourse regarding the role of soybeans in the emotional landscape of the digital age, while serving up a side of puns that could make even the most seasoned researcher chuckle.

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans, Illinois, genetically modified organisms, Google searches, 'i can't even', correlation coefficient, p-value, USDA data, Google Trends, agricultural influences, sociocultural implications, biotechnology, emotional expressions, internet users, modern life, digital exasperation, online colloquialisms, agricultural practices, emotional landscape, academic discourse, soybeans, research paper

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Illinois
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Illinois that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Illinois

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.8959588 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8027421 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Illinois) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.1E-7. 0.0000002139800901002208300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 2.1E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,673,332 random variables You don't actually need 4 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Illinois (GMO soybeans %)81818788879089929092919394939394949495
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([81,81,87,88,87,90,89,92,90,92,91,93,94,93,93,94,94,94,95,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Illinois"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1556 · Black Variable ID: 830 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0