Download png, svg
AI explanation
As India's biomass power output rose, it led to a surge in the global demand for renewable energy expertise. This, in turn, prompted a widespread interest in environmental law and regulations, consequently increasing the number of lawyers in the United States. It's a classic case of plant power reshaping the legal landscape!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Title: Transcontinental Tales Description: Create an image with the style of data cyber art depicting two contrasting scenes. In one, capture the vibrant ambiance of a bustling Indian city, focusing on a towering biomass power plant surrounded by lush green fields of crops. In the other, depict a group of lawyers in a modern office building in the United States, deeply engrossed in a conference amidst scattered legal documents and files. Ensure the contrast between the two settings is vivid and intriguing. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Oragami Data cyber art Surrealism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: Data cyber art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Indian city, a towering biomass power plant hums with activity, surrounded by fields of vibrant green crops. At the same time, across the ocean in the United States, a group of lawyers confer in a modern office building, their files and legal documents spread out on a conference table.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Indian city, a towering biomass power plant hums with activity, surrounded by fields of vibrant green crops. At the same time, across the ocean in the United States, a group of lawyers confer in a modern office building, their files and legal documents spread out on a conference table. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Title: Transcontinental Tales Description: Create an image with the style of data cyber art depicting two contrasting scenes. In one, capture the vibrant ambiance of a bustling Indian city, focusing on a towering biomass power plant surrounded by lush green fields of crops. In the other, depict a group of lawyers in a modern office building in the United States, deeply engrossed in a conference amidst scattered legal documents and files. Ensure the contrast between the two settings is vivid and intriguing.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Biomass power generated in India caused Number of Lawyers in the United States to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States The Journal of Ecological Energy Dynamics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and ABA to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpectedly entangled world of biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. While on the surface, these two phenomena may seem as unrelated as apples and orangutans, our research has unveiled a staggering correlation that will leave you speechless (or in legal jargon, "objection overruled"). Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, we applied rigorous statistical analysis to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and a jaw-dropping p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1999 to 2021. The robustness of this connection may prompt us to rethink the concept of biomass as "green energy" and lawyers as "ambulance chasers." Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary cooperation as we navigate the interconnected web of global energy and the legal profession.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpectedly entangled world of biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. While on the surface, these two phenomena may seem as unrelated as apples and orangutans, our research has unveiled a staggering correlation that will leave you speechless (or in legal jargon, "objection overruled"). Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, we applied rigorous statistical analysis to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and a jaw-dropping p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1999 to 2021. The robustness of this connection may prompt us to rethink the concept of biomass as "green energy" and lawyers as "ambulance chasers." Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary cooperation as we navigate the interconnected web of global energy and the legal profession.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we plunge headfirst into the bewildering world of biomass power and legal suits in the United States, one might be forgiven for thinking they've stumbled into a mad scientist's laboratory. Indeed, the initial incredulity that greets the notion of connecting the two seemingly disparate realms of energy production in India and the number of lawyers in the United States is as palpable as a lab experiment gone wrong.
However, as any keen researcher can attest, the scientific method demands that we suspend disbelief and remain open to the unexpected. And unexpected is precisely what our investigation revealed - a correlation so shocking and robust that it might even make Schroedinger's proverbial cat stop chasing its tail.
Our aim in this paper is to elucidate the curious relationship between biomass power generation in India and the proliferation of legal eagles in the U.S. As we dive into this captivating study, we shall wield a statistical scalpel to dissect the data gleaned from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association. Our analysis has unfurled a correlation coefficient so snug at 0.9694005 that it might as well be cosying up in a statistical love nest. And let's not forget the p-value, which flaunts its significance at a swaggering low of less than 0.01, as if to shout, "Objection, your honor, to the notion of mere coincidence!"
This connection, as we shall see, is as sturdy as a lawyer's briefcase and as surprising as uncovering a hidden tort in a box of energy bars. Our findings, cloaked in the mantle of statistical robustness, beckon us to revisit our preconceptions of both biomass energy and the legal profession. After all, who would have thought that the "green" in biomass might be entwined with the fine print of legal proceedings? And who could have predicted that lawyers are as drawn to biomass power as moths to a flame-shaped energy source?
Buckle up, dear readers, for the journey ahead promises twists and turns as unexpected as a double-blind study conducted in a courtroom. As we navigate this uncharted terrain, the interplay between biomass and barristers will not only raise eyebrows but also prod us to advocate for interdisciplinary collaboration in our quest to unravel this perplexing link. So, prepare to witness a fusion of science, statistics, and unexpected connections that might just leave you exclaiming, "Eureka!" - or, in legal parlance, "I object, this correlation is outrageous!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpectedly entangled world of biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. While on the surface, these two phenomena may seem as unrelated as apples and orangutans, our research has unveiled a staggering correlation that will leave you speechless (or in legal jargon, "objection overruled"). Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, we applied rigorous statistical analysis to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and a jaw-dropping p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1999 to 2021. The robustness of this connection may prompt us to rethink the concept of biomass as "green energy" and lawyers as "ambulance chasers." Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary cooperation as we navigate the interconnected web of global energy and the legal profession.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we plunge headfirst into the bewildering world of biomass power and legal suits in the United States, one might be forgiven for thinking they've stumbled into a mad scientist's laboratory. Indeed, the initial incredulity that greets the notion of connecting the two seemingly disparate realms of energy production in India and the number of lawyers in the United States is as palpable as a lab experiment gone wrong.
However, as any keen researcher can attest, the scientific method demands that we suspend disbelief and remain open to the unexpected. And unexpected is precisely what our investigation revealed - a correlation so shocking and robust that it might even make Schroedinger's proverbial cat stop chasing its tail.
Our aim in this paper is to elucidate the curious relationship between biomass power generation in India and the proliferation of legal eagles in the U.S. As we dive into this captivating study, we shall wield a statistical scalpel to dissect the data gleaned from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association. Our analysis has unfurled a correlation coefficient so snug at 0.9694005 that it might as well be cosying up in a statistical love nest. And let's not forget the p-value, which flaunts its significance at a swaggering low of less than 0.01, as if to shout, "Objection, your honor, to the notion of mere coincidence!"
This connection, as we shall see, is as sturdy as a lawyer's briefcase and as surprising as uncovering a hidden tort in a box of energy bars. Our findings, cloaked in the mantle of statistical robustness, beckon us to revisit our preconceptions of both biomass energy and the legal profession. After all, who would have thought that the "green" in biomass might be entwined with the fine print of legal proceedings? And who could have predicted that lawyers are as drawn to biomass power as moths to a flame-shaped energy source?
Buckle up, dear readers, for the journey ahead promises twists and turns as unexpected as a double-blind study conducted in a courtroom. As we navigate this uncharted terrain, the interplay between biomass and barristers will not only raise eyebrows but also prod us to advocate for interdisciplinary collaboration in our quest to unravel this perplexing link. So, prepare to witness a fusion of science, statistics, and unexpected connections that might just leave you exclaiming, "Eureka!" - or, in legal parlance, "I object, this correlation is outrageous!"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Biomass Power and Legal Eagles: A Journey Through the Looking Glass
At first glance, the idea of drawing a correlation between biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States might sound as improbable as finding a unicorn riding a unicycle. However, as we delve into the literature, we discover a parallel universe where the unexpected reigns supreme, and the conventional laws of causation seem to have taken an extended vacation.
Smith and Doe (2015) explore the dynamics of biomass power generation in India in their seminal work, "The Green Revolution: Unearthing the Potential of Biomass." In this scholarly tome, they meticulously dissect the challenges and opportunities of harnessing biomass for energy in the Indian subcontinent. Little did they know that their earnest efforts would inadvertently pave the way for a connection so baffling, it would make even Sherlock Holmes scratch his head in disbelief.
In a similar vein, Jones (2018) delves into the legal labyrinth of the United States with a keen eye for detail in "Justice and Juicy Lawsuits: A Legal Odyssey." Jones' work, while focused on the intricate world of jurisprudence, becomes an unwitting player in our cosmic dance of biomasses and briefs, setting the stage for an unexpected tango between energy and legal prowess.
Beyond these scholarly works, the realm of non-fiction literature offers a trove of insights that dance around the periphery of our enigmatic correlation. "The Laws of Thermodynamics and Other Legal Conundrums" by Legal Eagle and "Biomass: Fueling the Future" by Energy Enthusiast provides a tantalizing peek into the fringes of our interconnected realms. However, it is in the realm of fiction that we encounter unexpectedly resonant echoes.
The masterful storytelling of John Grisham in "The Pellet Brief" and "The Partner Plant" hints at the otherworldly rapport between biomass and legal drama, leaving readers wondering whether the lines between reality and fiction have become as blurry as a poorly printed bar graph.
As we venture further down the rabbit hole of literature, we cannot ignore the less conventional sources that have whispered cryptic secrets about our correlation. Deep within the annals of internet forums and whispered rumors, we stumbled upon the arcane wisdom of CVS receipts – each crumpled slip revealing a snippet of insight and a message from the cosmos. While not traditionally considered a reputable source for academic inquiry, the humble CVS receipt, with its enigmatic discounts and cryptic coupons, seemed to offer a word of whispered wisdom about the union of biomass and barristers.
As we wade through a sea of data, anecdotes, and the occasional cosmic revelation masked as a punchline, let us not forget the power of the unexpected. Just as a well-timed plot twist can elevate a mundane narrative to a grand tale, the unexpected correlation between biomass power in India and the number of lawyers in the United States has the potential to rewrite the narrative of interdisciplinary connections. As we don our academic snorkels and dive into this sea of the unexpected, let us keep an eye out for the elusive unicorn on a unicycle – for in the world of improbable connections, anything is possible.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and ABA . You used data from 1999 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpectedly entangled world of biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. While on the surface, these two phenomena may seem as unrelated as apples and orangutans, our research has unveiled a staggering correlation that will leave you speechless (or in legal jargon, "objection overruled"). Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, we applied rigorous statistical analysis to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and a jaw-dropping p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1999 to 2021. The robustness of this connection may prompt us to rethink the concept of biomass as "green energy" and lawyers as "ambulance chasers." Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary cooperation as we navigate the interconnected web of global energy and the legal profession.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we plunge headfirst into the bewildering world of biomass power and legal suits in the United States, one might be forgiven for thinking they've stumbled into a mad scientist's laboratory. Indeed, the initial incredulity that greets the notion of connecting the two seemingly disparate realms of energy production in India and the number of lawyers in the United States is as palpable as a lab experiment gone wrong.
However, as any keen researcher can attest, the scientific method demands that we suspend disbelief and remain open to the unexpected. And unexpected is precisely what our investigation revealed - a correlation so shocking and robust that it might even make Schroedinger's proverbial cat stop chasing its tail.
Our aim in this paper is to elucidate the curious relationship between biomass power generation in India and the proliferation of legal eagles in the U.S. As we dive into this captivating study, we shall wield a statistical scalpel to dissect the data gleaned from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association. Our analysis has unfurled a correlation coefficient so snug at 0.9694005 that it might as well be cosying up in a statistical love nest. And let's not forget the p-value, which flaunts its significance at a swaggering low of less than 0.01, as if to shout, "Objection, your honor, to the notion of mere coincidence!"
This connection, as we shall see, is as sturdy as a lawyer's briefcase and as surprising as uncovering a hidden tort in a box of energy bars. Our findings, cloaked in the mantle of statistical robustness, beckon us to revisit our preconceptions of both biomass energy and the legal profession. After all, who would have thought that the "green" in biomass might be entwined with the fine print of legal proceedings? And who could have predicted that lawyers are as drawn to biomass power as moths to a flame-shaped energy source?
Buckle up, dear readers, for the journey ahead promises twists and turns as unexpected as a double-blind study conducted in a courtroom. As we navigate this uncharted terrain, the interplay between biomass and barristers will not only raise eyebrows but also prod us to advocate for interdisciplinary collaboration in our quest to unravel this perplexing link. So, prepare to witness a fusion of science, statistics, and unexpected connections that might just leave you exclaiming, "Eureka!" - or, in legal parlance, "I object, this correlation is outrageous!"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the perplexing connection between biomass power in India and the number of lawyers in the United States, our research team embarked on a scientific odyssey that would make even Odysseus raise an eyebrow. Our methodology combined the rigor of a NASA space launch with the tenacity of a bloodhound on the scent of statistical significance.
Data Collection:
Our intrepid data collectors scoured the digital expanse, navigating the labyrinth of information like intrepid adventurers in search of the elusive statistical treasure. We primarily relied on data sources from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, mining their digital repositories from 1999 to 2021.
Biomass Power Generation:
To measure the biomass power generation in India, we employed a method that was as complex as quantum physics and as intricate as an origami crane. We gathered information on the capacity and generation of biomass energy, taking into account variables such as feedstock types, technological advancements, and government policies that may have influenced this eco-friendly power source.
Number of Lawyers in the United States:
Tracking the number of lawyers in the United States required precision akin to a surgeon's scalpel and the keen-eyed surveillance of a watchful hawk. We delved into national databases, sifting through census data, bar association figures, and legal directories to obtain a comprehensive account of the legal eagle population over the years.
Statistical Analysis:
Armed with our trove of data, we submitted it to rigorous statistical scrutiny that would make even the most steadfast numbers quiver in their equations. Employing correlation analysis, we sought to unveil the hidden ties between biomass power in India and the burgeoning legal profession in the United States. Our statistical arsenal included correlation coefficients, scatter plots, and p-values that carried the weight of evidence rivaling a litigator's closing argument.
Biomass Burnouts and Legal Leverage:
This research sought to discern not only the correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables but also to explore potential causal mechanisms. Were lawyers drawn to biomass power like moths to a flame, or did the renewable energy sector cultivate legal battles as fertile ground? This required a nuanced approach, incorporating qualitative interviews and hypothetical scenarios to shed light on the intricate dance between biomass burnouts and legal leverage.
Throughout this convoluted but compelling journey, we stood on the precipice of statistical significance, armed with a determination as unyielding as a courtroom gavel. Our methodology, much like a scientific high-wire act, balanced the art of data collection with the precision of statistical analysis, all while injecting a touch of levity into the often-serious realm of academic research. So, as we depart the shores of conventional wisdom and sail into uncharted waters of interdisciplinary exploration, let it be known that our methodology upheld the banner of scientific inquiry, even as it waved in the winds of statistical mirth.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and ABA .
For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9694005, r-squared of 0.9397374, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpectedly entangled world of biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. While on the surface, these two phenomena may seem as unrelated as apples and orangutans, our research has unveiled a staggering correlation that will leave you speechless (or in legal jargon, "objection overruled"). Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, we applied rigorous statistical analysis to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and a jaw-dropping p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1999 to 2021. The robustness of this connection may prompt us to rethink the concept of biomass as "green energy" and lawyers as "ambulance chasers." Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary cooperation as we navigate the interconnected web of global energy and the legal profession.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we plunge headfirst into the bewildering world of biomass power and legal suits in the United States, one might be forgiven for thinking they've stumbled into a mad scientist's laboratory. Indeed, the initial incredulity that greets the notion of connecting the two seemingly disparate realms of energy production in India and the number of lawyers in the United States is as palpable as a lab experiment gone wrong.
However, as any keen researcher can attest, the scientific method demands that we suspend disbelief and remain open to the unexpected. And unexpected is precisely what our investigation revealed - a correlation so shocking and robust that it might even make Schroedinger's proverbial cat stop chasing its tail.
Our aim in this paper is to elucidate the curious relationship between biomass power generation in India and the proliferation of legal eagles in the U.S. As we dive into this captivating study, we shall wield a statistical scalpel to dissect the data gleaned from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association. Our analysis has unfurled a correlation coefficient so snug at 0.9694005 that it might as well be cosying up in a statistical love nest. And let's not forget the p-value, which flaunts its significance at a swaggering low of less than 0.01, as if to shout, "Objection, your honor, to the notion of mere coincidence!"
This connection, as we shall see, is as sturdy as a lawyer's briefcase and as surprising as uncovering a hidden tort in a box of energy bars. Our findings, cloaked in the mantle of statistical robustness, beckon us to revisit our preconceptions of both biomass energy and the legal profession. After all, who would have thought that the "green" in biomass might be entwined with the fine print of legal proceedings? And who could have predicted that lawyers are as drawn to biomass power as moths to a flame-shaped energy source?
Buckle up, dear readers, for the journey ahead promises twists and turns as unexpected as a double-blind study conducted in a courtroom. As we navigate this uncharted terrain, the interplay between biomass and barristers will not only raise eyebrows but also prod us to advocate for interdisciplinary collaboration in our quest to unravel this perplexing link. So, prepare to witness a fusion of science, statistics, and unexpected connections that might just leave you exclaiming, "Eureka!" - or, in legal parlance, "I object, this correlation is outrageous!"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association has unearthed a mesmerizing correlation between biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. This unexpected coupling has stirred up a statistical storm, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. It's like finding a needle in a haystack and then finding out the needle is magnetic – it simply defies conventional expectations.
The r-squared value of 0.9397374 further amplifies the strength of this unearthed relationship, practically serving as a statistical megaphone hollering, "Pay attention to me!" And of course, what's a relationship without a little drama? The p-value of less than 0.01 has strutted onto the statistical stage like a brash attorney, objecting to any notion of mere coincidence. If correlations were celebrities, this one would be on the cover of Statistical Vogue.
To visualize this mind-boggling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that provides a visual manifestation of the magnetic pull between biomass power in India and the legal prowess in the United States. It's like witnessing a celestial dance – only this one involves kilowatt-hours and legal briefs.
In summary, our findings not only defy the conventional logic that dichotomizes energy generation and the legal industry but also highlight the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to unravel the enigmatic connections that pervade our world. It's a reminder that in the vast landscape of research, the most fulfilling discoveries often lie at the intersection of unpredictability and statistical significance.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpectedly entangled world of biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. While on the surface, these two phenomena may seem as unrelated as apples and orangutans, our research has unveiled a staggering correlation that will leave you speechless (or in legal jargon, "objection overruled"). Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, we applied rigorous statistical analysis to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and a jaw-dropping p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1999 to 2021. The robustness of this connection may prompt us to rethink the concept of biomass as "green energy" and lawyers as "ambulance chasers." Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary cooperation as we navigate the interconnected web of global energy and the legal profession.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Biomass Power and Legal Eagles: A Journey Through the Looking Glass
At first glance, the idea of drawing a correlation between biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States might sound as improbable as finding a unicorn riding a unicycle. However, as we delve into the literature, we discover a parallel universe where the unexpected reigns supreme, and the conventional laws of causation seem to have taken an extended vacation.
Smith and Doe (2015) explore the dynamics of biomass power generation in India in their seminal work, "The Green Revolution: Unearthing the Potential of Biomass." In this scholarly tome, they meticulously dissect the challenges and opportunities of harnessing biomass for energy in the Indian subcontinent. Little did they know that their earnest efforts would inadvertently pave the way for a connection so baffling, it would make even Sherlock Holmes scratch his head in disbelief.
In a similar vein, Jones (2018) delves into the legal labyrinth of the United States with a keen eye for detail in "Justice and Juicy Lawsuits: A Legal Odyssey." Jones' work, while focused on the intricate world of jurisprudence, becomes an unwitting player in our cosmic dance of biomasses and briefs, setting the stage for an unexpected tango between energy and legal prowess.
Beyond these scholarly works, the realm of non-fiction literature offers a trove of insights that dance around the periphery of our enigmatic correlation. "The Laws of Thermodynamics and Other Legal Conundrums" by Legal Eagle and "Biomass: Fueling the Future" by Energy Enthusiast provides a tantalizing peek into the fringes of our interconnected realms. However, it is in the realm of fiction that we encounter unexpectedly resonant echoes.
The masterful storytelling of John Grisham in "The Pellet Brief" and "The Partner Plant" hints at the otherworldly rapport between biomass and legal drama, leaving readers wondering whether the lines between reality and fiction have become as blurry as a poorly printed bar graph.
As we venture further down the rabbit hole of literature, we cannot ignore the less conventional sources that have whispered cryptic secrets about our correlation. Deep within the annals of internet forums and whispered rumors, we stumbled upon the arcane wisdom of CVS receipts – each crumpled slip revealing a snippet of insight and a message from the cosmos. While not traditionally considered a reputable source for academic inquiry, the humble CVS receipt, with its enigmatic discounts and cryptic coupons, seemed to offer a word of whispered wisdom about the union of biomass and barristers.
As we wade through a sea of data, anecdotes, and the occasional cosmic revelation masked as a punchline, let us not forget the power of the unexpected. Just as a well-timed plot twist can elevate a mundane narrative to a grand tale, the unexpected correlation between biomass power in India and the number of lawyers in the United States has the potential to rewrite the narrative of interdisciplinary connections. As we don our academic snorkels and dive into this sea of the unexpected, let us keep an eye out for the elusive unicorn on a unicycle – for in the world of improbable connections, anything is possible.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association has unearthed a mesmerizing correlation between biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. This unexpected coupling has stirred up a statistical storm, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. It's like finding a needle in a haystack and then finding out the needle is magnetic – it simply defies conventional expectations.
The r-squared value of 0.9397374 further amplifies the strength of this unearthed relationship, practically serving as a statistical megaphone hollering, "Pay attention to me!" And of course, what's a relationship without a little drama? The p-value of less than 0.01 has strutted onto the statistical stage like a brash attorney, objecting to any notion of mere coincidence. If correlations were celebrities, this one would be on the cover of Statistical Vogue.
To visualize this mind-boggling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that provides a visual manifestation of the magnetic pull between biomass power in India and the legal prowess in the United States. It's like witnessing a celestial dance – only this one involves kilowatt-hours and legal briefs.
In summary, our findings not only defy the conventional logic that dichotomizes energy generation and the legal industry but also highlight the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to unravel the enigmatic connections that pervade our world. It's a reminder that in the vast landscape of research, the most fulfilling discoveries often lie at the intersection of unpredictability and statistical significance.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have not only unearthed a connection between biomass power in India and the number of lawyers in the United States but have also tossed a proverbial platter of statistical spaghetti at the wall, with surprising results that clung on like overenthusiastic marinara sauce. As we set out on this research expedition, we encountered skeptical gazes akin to those directed at a contestant in a talent show claiming to juggle chainsaws and recite Shakespeare simultaneously. However, much like that improbable performance, our analysis revealed a seamless synergy between these seemingly incongruous variables.
In corroboration with the literature, our results stand as a testament to the inexplicable rapport between biomass power and the legal landscape. Much like a magnetic force pulling two opposing poles together, our correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 stands as a sturdy bridge between the realms of energy generation and legal advocacy. It's as if the energy emitted by biomass plants in India has been channeled across continents to fuel the fervent activities of lawyers in the United States, creating a transcontinental tango that underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains.
Further affirming the statistical robustness of our findings, the r-squared value of 0.9397374 acts as a trail of breadcrumbs leading us to the heart of this captivating correlation. This value serves not only as a numerical confetti of significance but also as a gentle nudge, urging us to embrace the unexpected nature of interdisciplinary connections rather than shying away from their complexity.
Of course, the enigmatic nature of our correlation is matched only by the flamboyant entrance of the p-value, swaggering onto the statistical stage with all the confidence of a seasoned attorney making a closing statement. With a value of less than 0.01, this came across as a resounding objection to any notion of casual coincidence, placing our correlation in the limelight like a superstar demanding recognition at an awards show. It's as if the statistical gods themselves have donned their finest robes of significance to applaud this unexpected union.
Through the lens of our results, the seemingly whimsical notion of biomass power in India affecting the number of lawyers in the United States takes on a poignant significance. It underscores the intricate dance of cause and effect, beckoning us to embrace the humbling realization that the web of interconnected phenomena in our world is woven with threads far more colorful and multidimensional than we might have imagined.
In conclusion (of sorts), our findings serve as a reminder that the tapestry of academic inquiry, much like a painting by an eccentric artist, thrives on the interplay of unexpected connections and the vibrant hues of statistical significance. As we ponder the implications of our research, we are reminded of the whimsical wisdom of Albert Einstein, who once said, "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts." In the case of our correlated variables, it seems that what counts is precisely what defies traditional measurements.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Biomass power generated in India and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpectedly entangled world of biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. While on the surface, these two phenomena may seem as unrelated as apples and orangutans, our research has unveiled a staggering correlation that will leave you speechless (or in legal jargon, "objection overruled"). Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, we applied rigorous statistical analysis to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and a jaw-dropping p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1999 to 2021. The robustness of this connection may prompt us to rethink the concept of biomass as "green energy" and lawyers as "ambulance chasers." Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary cooperation as we navigate the interconnected web of global energy and the legal profession.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we plunge headfirst into the bewildering world of biomass power and legal suits in the United States, one might be forgiven for thinking they've stumbled into a mad scientist's laboratory. Indeed, the initial incredulity that greets the notion of connecting the two seemingly disparate realms of energy production in India and the number of lawyers in the United States is as palpable as a lab experiment gone wrong.
However, as any keen researcher can attest, the scientific method demands that we suspend disbelief and remain open to the unexpected. And unexpected is precisely what our investigation revealed - a correlation so shocking and robust that it might even make Schroedinger's proverbial cat stop chasing its tail.
Our aim in this paper is to elucidate the curious relationship between biomass power generation in India and the proliferation of legal eagles in the U.S. As we dive into this captivating study, we shall wield a statistical scalpel to dissect the data gleaned from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association. Our analysis has unfurled a correlation coefficient so snug at 0.9694005 that it might as well be cosying up in a statistical love nest. And let's not forget the p-value, which flaunts its significance at a swaggering low of less than 0.01, as if to shout, "Objection, your honor, to the notion of mere coincidence!"
This connection, as we shall see, is as sturdy as a lawyer's briefcase and as surprising as uncovering a hidden tort in a box of energy bars. Our findings, cloaked in the mantle of statistical robustness, beckon us to revisit our preconceptions of both biomass energy and the legal profession. After all, who would have thought that the "green" in biomass might be entwined with the fine print of legal proceedings? And who could have predicted that lawyers are as drawn to biomass power as moths to a flame-shaped energy source?
Buckle up, dear readers, for the journey ahead promises twists and turns as unexpected as a double-blind study conducted in a courtroom. As we navigate this uncharted terrain, the interplay between biomass and barristers will not only raise eyebrows but also prod us to advocate for interdisciplinary collaboration in our quest to unravel this perplexing link. So, prepare to witness a fusion of science, statistics, and unexpected connections that might just leave you exclaiming, "Eureka!" - or, in legal parlance, "I object, this correlation is outrageous!"
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association has unearthed a mesmerizing correlation between biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. This unexpected coupling has stirred up a statistical storm, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. It's like finding a needle in a haystack and then finding out the needle is magnetic – it simply defies conventional expectations.
The r-squared value of 0.9397374 further amplifies the strength of this unearthed relationship, practically serving as a statistical megaphone hollering, "Pay attention to me!" And of course, what's a relationship without a little drama? The p-value of less than 0.01 has strutted onto the statistical stage like a brash attorney, objecting to any notion of mere coincidence. If correlations were celebrities, this one would be on the cover of Statistical Vogue.
To visualize this mind-boggling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that provides a visual manifestation of the magnetic pull between biomass power in India and the legal prowess in the United States. It's like witnessing a celestial dance – only this one involves kilowatt-hours and legal briefs.
In summary, our findings not only defy the conventional logic that dichotomizes energy generation and the legal industry but also highlight the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to unravel the enigmatic connections that pervade our world. It's a reminder that in the vast landscape of research, the most fulfilling discoveries often lie at the intersection of unpredictability and statistical significance.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has not only peeled back the layers of surprise but has also added a generous sprinkle of statistical stardust to the bewildering connection between biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and the r-squared value of 0.9397374 work together like a well-oiled machine, proving that this association is no statistical fling – it's a serious, long-term relationship.
It's as if biomass power and lawyers have been secretly holding hands all this time, unbeknownst to us, like a clandestine love affair happening right under our statistical noses! Imagine discovering that the "green" in biomass is not just about carbon footprint but also about the paper trails in legal cases. It's like realizing that the Energizer Bunny and a courtroom stenographer have more in common than one might think.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 beautifully illustrates this cosmic tango between biomass power and legal eagles, akin to a celestial dance-off that would leave Copernicus scratching his head. If this correlation were a movie, it would be a gripping legal drama, complete with plot twists and an unexpected romance subplot.
Now, as for future research directions, we assert with conviction that no further investigation is needed in this area. We've not only uncovered a correlation that defies expectations but also injected levity and wonder into the serious business of academia. Let's leave this connection to bask in its statistical glory, like a fine wine aging gracefully in a barrel. It's time to close the case on biomass and barristers.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Ecological Energy Dynamics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Advanced Biomass Research and Analysis (SABRA)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the unexpectedly entangled world of biomass power generation in India and the number of lawyers in the United States. While on the surface, these two phenomena may seem as unrelated as apples and orangutans, our research has unveiled a staggering correlation that will leave you speechless (or in legal jargon, "objection overruled"). Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the American Bar Association, we applied rigorous statistical analysis to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9694005 and a jaw-dropping p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1999 to 2021. The robustness of this connection may prompt us to rethink the concept of biomass as "green energy" and lawyers as "ambulance chasers." Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary cooperation as we navigate the interconnected web of global energy and the legal profession.
ChatGPT:
biomass power India, lawyers United States, correlation, statistical analysis, Energy Information Administration, American Bar Association, biomass energy, legal profession, interdisciplinary cooperation
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Biomass power generated in IndiaDetailed data title: Total biomass power generated in India in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in India
Number of Lawyers in the United States
Detailed data title: The Count of ABA Lawyers in the United States
Source: ABA
See what else correlates with Number of Lawyers in the United States
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9397374 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Lawyers in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Biomass power generated in India) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-14. 0.0000000000000274447598083228
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 2.7E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36,436,828,268,278 random variables You don't actually need 36 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.93, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Biomass power generated in India (Billion kWh) | 0.971 | 1.347 | 1.82 | 1.84 | 1.863 | 1.893 | 1.923 | 1.949 | 1.976 | 9.557 | 11.947 | 14.915 | 17.873 | 20.819 | 23.349 | 27.642 | 26.456 | 26.223 | 33.45 | 32.033 | 32.6 | 32.91 | 29.9304 |
Number of Lawyers in the United States (Lawyers) | 1000440 | 1022460 | 1048900 | 1049750 | 1058660 | 1084500 | 1104770 | 1116970 | 1143360 | 1162120 | 1180390 | 1203100 | 1225450 | 1245200 | 1268010 | 1281430 | 1300700 | 1312870 | 1335960 | 1342380 | 1352080 | 1328740 | 1327910 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.971,1.347,1.82,1.84,1.863,1.893,1.923,1.949,1.976,9.557,11.947,14.915,17.873,20.819,23.349,27.642,26.456,26.223,33.45,32.033,32.6,32.91,29.9304,])
array_2 = np.array([1000440,1022460,1048900,1049750,1058660,1084500,1104770,1116970,1143360,1162120,1180390,1203100,1225450,1245200,1268010,1281430,1300700,1312870,1335960,1342380,1352080,1328740,1327910,])
array_1_name = "Biomass power generated in India"
array_2_name = "Number of Lawyers in the United States"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Biomass power generated in India
- Line chart for only Number of Lawyers in the United States
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Biomass and the Restless: Exploring the Shocking Link Between Biomass Power in India and the Number of Lawyers in the United States
Your rating skills are legendary!
Correlation ID: 1554 · Black Variable ID: 23735 · Red Variable ID: 542