about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,550 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Latoya and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Panama.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of the first name Latoya waned, so did the strong, vibrant energy associated with it. This subtle but crucial shift in the collective consciousness had a ripple effect, reaching all the way to Panama. The biomass power plants, fueled by organic material, were somehow in tune with this phenomenon. Perhaps there was a secret Latoya fan club among the power plant workers. Without even realizing it, they had been inadvertently channeling Latoya-specific enthusiasm to boost the biomass power generation. But as fewer babies received the name Latoya, the connection weakened. It's a stark reminder that our choices in baby names can have far-reaching, unforeseen consequences - even in the world of renewable energy.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: [Symbolism] Create an image that symbolizes the intertwining of nature and community in a bustling Panamanian city. Show a towering biomass power plant standing against the urban skyline, its turbines humming with vitality. Meanwhile, in the heart of the city, a group of people gathers around a vibrant local cafe, buzzing with excitement about Latoya's arrival. Let the image illustrate the fusion of sustainable energy and the warmth of community, capturing the interconnectedness of urban life with the environment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus a Polaroid photo High-tech Minimalism Symbolism
ChatGPT: Symbolism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Panamanian city, a large biomass power plant stands towering over the landscape. Its massive turbines hum with activity, generating clean energy for the community. In the heart of the city, a group of people gathers around a popular local cafe, chattering excitedly about a baby named Latoya, whose arrival has captured the attention and affection of the entire neighborhood.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Symbolism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Panamanian city, a large biomass power plant stands towering over the landscape. Its massive turbines hum with activity, generating clean energy for the community. In the heart of the city, a group of people gathers around a popular local cafe, chattering excitedly about a baby named Latoya, whose arrival has captured the attention and affection of the entire neighborhood. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: [Symbolism] Create an image that symbolizes the intertwining of nature and community in a bustling Panamanian city. Show a towering biomass power plant standing against the urban skyline, its turbines humming with vitality. Meanwhile, in the heart of the city, a group of people gathers around a vibrant local cafe, buzzing with excitement about Latoya's arrival. Let the image illustrate the fusion of sustainable energy and the warmth of community, capturing the interconnectedness of urban life with the environment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Latoya caused Biomass power generated in Panama to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation

The Journal of Eclectic Biomass Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8581653 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavored to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Latoya among newborns in the United States and the biomass power generated in the lush landscapes of Panama. We harnessed the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration to trace the trajectory of the moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021 and correlated it with the biomass power production statistics obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

Our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by a staggeringly low p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between the two ostensibly disparate variables. We charted the undulating popularity of the name Latoya and juxtaposed it with the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the tropical haven of Panama.

Our findings not only suggest a bountiful synergy between the nomenclature of Latoya and the sustainable energy pursuits in Panama but also hint at the cryptic interplay of cultural influences and environmental initiatives. While the causative mechanisms behind this quirky correlation remain to be deciphered, this study sheds lighthearted light on a curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavored to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Latoya among newborns in the United States and the biomass power generated in the lush landscapes of Panama. We harnessed the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration to trace the trajectory of the moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021 and correlated it with the biomass power production statistics obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

Our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by a staggeringly low p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between the two ostensibly disparate variables. We charted the undulating popularity of the name Latoya and juxtaposed it with the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the tropical haven of Panama.

Our findings not only suggest a bountiful synergy between the nomenclature of Latoya and the sustainable energy pursuits in Panama but also hint at the cryptic interplay of cultural influences and environmental initiatives. While the causative mechanisms behind this quirky correlation remain to be deciphered, this study sheds lighthearted light on a curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long captivated the inquisitive minds of researchers, offering an intriguing lens through which to explore the intriguing dance between societal trends and ecological dynamics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected and arguably peculiar connection between the prevalence of the first name Latoya and the production of biomass power in the tropical paradise of Panama.

While traditionally, studies investigating the correlation between personal names and societal trends have focused on more conventional metrics such as economic indicators or cultural influences, the association between the choice of the name Latoya and biomass power generation presents a refreshing departure from the norms. As we delve into this unconventional correlation, we uncover a peculiar synchrony that prompts us to ponder the potential underlying forces at play.

The captivating allure of the name Latoya, with its melodic cadence and distinctive flair, has traversed the landscapes of the United States, leaving a resounding impression on generations past and present. Simultaneously, the verdant terrains of Panama have witnessed the burgeoning growth of biomass power generation, tapping into the wealth of organic resources to fuel sustainable energy endeavors. Our research aims to shed light on the surprising harmony between these seemingly disconnected phenomena and perhaps inject a touch of levity into the traditionally staid realm of statistical analysis.

As we embark on this whimsical exploration, we invite the reader to partake in an intellectual jaunt that meanders through the annals of nomenclatural trends and ecological ingenuity. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to elucidate the enigmatic relationship between the vivacious moniker Latoya and the burgeoning bioenergy landscape in Panama. Stay tuned for the unfolding revelations that promise to intertwine statistical acumen with a dash of mirth in our pursuit of unraveling this charming conundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavored to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Latoya among newborns in the United States and the biomass power generated in the lush landscapes of Panama. We harnessed the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration to trace the trajectory of the moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021 and correlated it with the biomass power production statistics obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

Our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by a staggeringly low p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between the two ostensibly disparate variables. We charted the undulating popularity of the name Latoya and juxtaposed it with the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the tropical haven of Panama.

Our findings not only suggest a bountiful synergy between the nomenclature of Latoya and the sustainable energy pursuits in Panama but also hint at the cryptic interplay of cultural influences and environmental initiatives. While the causative mechanisms behind this quirky correlation remain to be deciphered, this study sheds lighthearted light on a curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long captivated the inquisitive minds of researchers, offering an intriguing lens through which to explore the intriguing dance between societal trends and ecological dynamics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected and arguably peculiar connection between the prevalence of the first name Latoya and the production of biomass power in the tropical paradise of Panama.
While traditionally, studies investigating the correlation between personal names and societal trends have focused on more conventional metrics such as economic indicators or cultural influences, the association between the choice of the name Latoya and biomass power generation presents a refreshing departure from the norms. As we delve into this unconventional correlation, we uncover a peculiar synchrony that prompts us to ponder the potential underlying forces at play.
The captivating allure of the name Latoya, with its melodic cadence and distinctive flair, has traversed the landscapes of the United States, leaving a resounding impression on generations past and present. Simultaneously, the verdant terrains of Panama have witnessed the burgeoning growth of biomass power generation, tapping into the wealth of organic resources to fuel sustainable energy endeavors. Our research aims to shed light on the surprising harmony between these seemingly disconnected phenomena and perhaps inject a touch of levity into the traditionally staid realm of statistical analysis.
As we embark on this whimsical exploration, we invite the reader to partake in an intellectual jaunt that meanders through the annals of nomenclatural trends and ecological ingenuity. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to elucidate the enigmatic relationship between the vivacious moniker Latoya and the burgeoning bioenergy landscape in Panama. Stay tuned for the unfolding revelations that promise to intertwine statistical acumen with a dash of mirth in our pursuit of unraveling this charming conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on the correlation between personal names and environmental phenomena is surprisingly scarce, given the potential insights it can offer into the interplay of societal trends and ecological dynamics. However, a handful of studies have ventured into this intriguing realm, albeit from more conventional perspectives.

Smith (2008) delved into the influence of personal names on career trajectories, positing that individuals with certain names may be predisposed to specific occupational paths. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2014) explored the implications of name popularity on social interactions and interpersonal relationships, shedding light on the nuanced impact of nomenclature on societal dynamics.

Shifting our focus to the realm of ecological endeavors, Book (2012) presented a comprehensive analysis of renewable energy initiatives in Central America, with a particular emphasis on biomass power generation in Panama. In a similar vein, Book (2016) scrutinized the cultural and environmental dimensions of nomenclatural trends, laying the groundwork for more interdisciplinary explorations in this unusual intersection.

As we navigate through the labyrinth of literature, it becomes apparent that the connection between the first name Latoya and biomass power generation in Panama has largely escaped scholarly scrutiny. However, venturing into more tangential realms, we encounter an eclectic mix of fiction and non-fiction works that inadvertently skirt around the periphery of our inquiry. Books such as "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri and "The Power" by Naomi Alderman offer glimpses into the intricate tapestry of personal nomenclature and societal dynamics, albeit within fictional universes that evoke contemplation rather than empirical scrutiny.

On the cinematic front, the authors have also taken the liberty of exploring movies with tenuous connections to our research topic, including "A Beautiful Mind," which, despite being an exploration of mathematical genius, touches upon the enigmatic allure of names and their underlying significance.

In the absence of direct scholarly contributions on the precise correlation between the prevalence of the name Latoya and biomass power generation in Panama, this study embarks on an unprecedented journey that endeavors to infuse a hint of whimsy into the realm of statistical inquiry. As we assemble the threads of literature and embark on our statistical odyssey, we invite the reader to accompany us on this unconventional yet strangely captivating undertaking.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavored to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Latoya among newborns in the United States and the biomass power generated in the lush landscapes of Panama. We harnessed the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration to trace the trajectory of the moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021 and correlated it with the biomass power production statistics obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

Our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by a staggeringly low p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between the two ostensibly disparate variables. We charted the undulating popularity of the name Latoya and juxtaposed it with the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the tropical haven of Panama.

Our findings not only suggest a bountiful synergy between the nomenclature of Latoya and the sustainable energy pursuits in Panama but also hint at the cryptic interplay of cultural influences and environmental initiatives. While the causative mechanisms behind this quirky correlation remain to be deciphered, this study sheds lighthearted light on a curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long captivated the inquisitive minds of researchers, offering an intriguing lens through which to explore the intriguing dance between societal trends and ecological dynamics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected and arguably peculiar connection between the prevalence of the first name Latoya and the production of biomass power in the tropical paradise of Panama.
While traditionally, studies investigating the correlation between personal names and societal trends have focused on more conventional metrics such as economic indicators or cultural influences, the association between the choice of the name Latoya and biomass power generation presents a refreshing departure from the norms. As we delve into this unconventional correlation, we uncover a peculiar synchrony that prompts us to ponder the potential underlying forces at play.
The captivating allure of the name Latoya, with its melodic cadence and distinctive flair, has traversed the landscapes of the United States, leaving a resounding impression on generations past and present. Simultaneously, the verdant terrains of Panama have witnessed the burgeoning growth of biomass power generation, tapping into the wealth of organic resources to fuel sustainable energy endeavors. Our research aims to shed light on the surprising harmony between these seemingly disconnected phenomena and perhaps inject a touch of levity into the traditionally staid realm of statistical analysis.
As we embark on this whimsical exploration, we invite the reader to partake in an intellectual jaunt that meanders through the annals of nomenclatural trends and ecological ingenuity. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to elucidate the enigmatic relationship between the vivacious moniker Latoya and the burgeoning bioenergy landscape in Panama. Stay tuned for the unfolding revelations that promise to intertwine statistical acumen with a dash of mirth in our pursuit of unraveling this charming conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The first step in our zany quest to explore the wacky correlation between the popularity of the name Latoya and biomass power generation in Panama involved gathering a trove of data from the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The SSA graciously provided us with comprehensive data on the number of infants bestowed with the delightful moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021, allowing us to track the undulating waves of Latoya's appeal over the decades. Meanwhile, the EIA furnished us with detailed statistics on biomass power generation in the lush landscapes of Panama during the same time span, granting us a glimpse into the verdant world of bioenergy production.

Data Analysis:
With our treasure trove of data in hand, we embarked on a statistical odyssey to unravel the tantalizing correlation between Latoya's limelight and Panama's prowess in biomass power generation. We utilized sophisticated statistical software, employing a series of intricate correlation analyses to scrutinize the relationship between the frequency of the name Latoya and the biomassy outputs of Panama. Our analysis took into account various confounding variables, ensuring that our findings were as robust as humanly possible in the world of statistical whimsy.

Correlation Coefficient Calculation:
To quantify the strength of the bond between Latoya's ubiquity and Panama's biomass power generation, we calculated the correlation coefficient with meticulous care. The resulting coefficient, in all its statistical splendor, endowed us with a numerical measure of the association between these seemingly incongruous variables. Our correlation coefficient succinctly encapsulated the extent to which the rise and fall of Latoya's popularity mirrored the fluctuations in Panama's bioenergy landscape, painting a whimsical picture of nomenclatural and ecological synchrony.

p-Value Marveling:
In a dazzling display of statistical sorcery, we peered into the enchanting world of p-values to assess the significance of our findings. Much to our delight, the p-value emerged with a sparkle, showcasing its diminutive stature and affirming the robustness of the peculiar correlation uncovered in our analysis. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings sparkled with statistical significance, underscoring the compelling nature of the connection between Latoya's allure and Panama's bioenergy exploits.

Interpretive Dance... I Mean, Interpretation:
Armed with a suite of gleaming statistical results, we waltzed into the realm of interpretation, aiming to decode the hidden messages nestled within the numerical tapestry of our findings. Our interpretive dance, ahem... interpretation, sought to unravel the enigmatic forces that orchestrate the harmonious choreography between Latoya's rise to stardom and Panama's foray into sustainable biomass power generation.

In conclusion, our methodology, despite its whimsical flourish, lays the groundwork for an in-depth investigation into the playful correlation between the effervescent name Latoya and the verdant world of biomass power generation in Panama. With our data in hand and a twinkle in our statistical eyes, we cast a lighthearted gaze upon the intertwining realms of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors, inviting readers to join us on this droll adventure through the annals of statistical whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8581653, r-squared of 0.7364478, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavored to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Latoya among newborns in the United States and the biomass power generated in the lush landscapes of Panama. We harnessed the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration to trace the trajectory of the moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021 and correlated it with the biomass power production statistics obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

Our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by a staggeringly low p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between the two ostensibly disparate variables. We charted the undulating popularity of the name Latoya and juxtaposed it with the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the tropical haven of Panama.

Our findings not only suggest a bountiful synergy between the nomenclature of Latoya and the sustainable energy pursuits in Panama but also hint at the cryptic interplay of cultural influences and environmental initiatives. While the causative mechanisms behind this quirky correlation remain to be deciphered, this study sheds lighthearted light on a curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long captivated the inquisitive minds of researchers, offering an intriguing lens through which to explore the intriguing dance between societal trends and ecological dynamics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected and arguably peculiar connection between the prevalence of the first name Latoya and the production of biomass power in the tropical paradise of Panama.
While traditionally, studies investigating the correlation between personal names and societal trends have focused on more conventional metrics such as economic indicators or cultural influences, the association between the choice of the name Latoya and biomass power generation presents a refreshing departure from the norms. As we delve into this unconventional correlation, we uncover a peculiar synchrony that prompts us to ponder the potential underlying forces at play.
The captivating allure of the name Latoya, with its melodic cadence and distinctive flair, has traversed the landscapes of the United States, leaving a resounding impression on generations past and present. Simultaneously, the verdant terrains of Panama have witnessed the burgeoning growth of biomass power generation, tapping into the wealth of organic resources to fuel sustainable energy endeavors. Our research aims to shed light on the surprising harmony between these seemingly disconnected phenomena and perhaps inject a touch of levity into the traditionally staid realm of statistical analysis.
As we embark on this whimsical exploration, we invite the reader to partake in an intellectual jaunt that meanders through the annals of nomenclatural trends and ecological ingenuity. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to elucidate the enigmatic relationship between the vivacious moniker Latoya and the burgeoning bioenergy landscape in Panama. Stay tuned for the unfolding revelations that promise to intertwine statistical acumen with a dash of mirth in our pursuit of unraveling this charming conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The rigorous statistical analysis of the prevalence of the first name Latoya in the United States and the production of biomass power in Panama yielded remarkable insights. We found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by an r-squared of 0.7364478. The associated p-value, impressively low at less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Upon plotting the data, as depicted in Fig. 1, a clear and compelling relationship emerged, manifesting as a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the name Latoya and the biomass power generation in Panama over the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The scatterplot vividly portrays the synchronous undulation of these variables, revealing a remarkably cohesive trend.

Our findings not only attest to the statistical significance of this correlation but also invite whimsical ponderings on the interplay of social conventions and environmental pursuits. The buoyant resonance of the first name Latoya in the United States appears to harmonize with the burgeoning growth of biomass power generation in the lush landscapes of Panama, encapsulating a delightful fusion of cultural nomenclature and ecological innovation.

While the precise mechanisms underpinning this intriguing connection remain cloaked in enigma, this study offers a lighthearted glimpse into the potential interweaving of societal naming trends and environmental endeavors, adding a touch of mirth to the oftentimes sober realm of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavored to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Latoya among newborns in the United States and the biomass power generated in the lush landscapes of Panama. We harnessed the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration to trace the trajectory of the moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021 and correlated it with the biomass power production statistics obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

Our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by a staggeringly low p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between the two ostensibly disparate variables. We charted the undulating popularity of the name Latoya and juxtaposed it with the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the tropical haven of Panama.

Our findings not only suggest a bountiful synergy between the nomenclature of Latoya and the sustainable energy pursuits in Panama but also hint at the cryptic interplay of cultural influences and environmental initiatives. While the causative mechanisms behind this quirky correlation remain to be deciphered, this study sheds lighthearted light on a curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the correlation between personal names and environmental phenomena is surprisingly scarce, given the potential insights it can offer into the interplay of societal trends and ecological dynamics. However, a handful of studies have ventured into this intriguing realm, albeit from more conventional perspectives.
Smith (2008) delved into the influence of personal names on career trajectories, positing that individuals with certain names may be predisposed to specific occupational paths. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2014) explored the implications of name popularity on social interactions and interpersonal relationships, shedding light on the nuanced impact of nomenclature on societal dynamics.
Shifting our focus to the realm of ecological endeavors, Book (2012) presented a comprehensive analysis of renewable energy initiatives in Central America, with a particular emphasis on biomass power generation in Panama. In a similar vein, Book (2016) scrutinized the cultural and environmental dimensions of nomenclatural trends, laying the groundwork for more interdisciplinary explorations in this unusual intersection.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of literature, it becomes apparent that the connection between the first name Latoya and biomass power generation in Panama has largely escaped scholarly scrutiny. However, venturing into more tangential realms, we encounter an eclectic mix of fiction and non-fiction works that inadvertently skirt around the periphery of our inquiry. Books such as "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri and "The Power" by Naomi Alderman offer glimpses into the intricate tapestry of personal nomenclature and societal dynamics, albeit within fictional universes that evoke contemplation rather than empirical scrutiny.
On the cinematic front, the authors have also taken the liberty of exploring movies with tenuous connections to our research topic, including "A Beautiful Mind," which, despite being an exploration of mathematical genius, touches upon the enigmatic allure of names and their underlying significance.
In the absence of direct scholarly contributions on the precise correlation between the prevalence of the name Latoya and biomass power generation in Panama, this study embarks on an unprecedented journey that endeavors to infuse a hint of whimsy into the realm of statistical inquiry. As we assemble the threads of literature and embark on our statistical odyssey, we invite the reader to accompany us on this unconventional yet strangely captivating undertaking.

[[RESULTS]]
The rigorous statistical analysis of the prevalence of the first name Latoya in the United States and the production of biomass power in Panama yielded remarkable insights. We found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by an r-squared of 0.7364478. The associated p-value, impressively low at less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Upon plotting the data, as depicted in Fig. 1, a clear and compelling relationship emerged, manifesting as a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the name Latoya and the biomass power generation in Panama over the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The scatterplot vividly portrays the synchronous undulation of these variables, revealing a remarkably cohesive trend.
Our findings not only attest to the statistical significance of this correlation but also invite whimsical ponderings on the interplay of social conventions and environmental pursuits. The buoyant resonance of the first name Latoya in the United States appears to harmonize with the burgeoning growth of biomass power generation in the lush landscapes of Panama, encapsulating a delightful fusion of cultural nomenclature and ecological innovation.
While the precise mechanisms underpinning this intriguing connection remain cloaked in enigma, this study offers a lighthearted glimpse into the potential interweaving of societal naming trends and environmental endeavors, adding a touch of mirth to the oftentimes sober realm of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The pervasive proclivity of studies focusing on the correlation between personal names and environmental phenomena is rather sparse, rendering our foray into this whimsical terrain quite the uncommon occurrence. Nevertheless, our findings have brought to light an unexpected yet compelling linkage between the popularity of the first name Latoya and the realm of biomass power generation in Panama. Indeed, our statistical analysis has not only buttressed the existent literature but also introduced a buoyant twist to the otherwise staid domain of statistical inquiry.

Building on the unlikeliest junction of nomenclature and sustainable energy production, our study echoes the weighty insights of Book (2016), who espoused the cultural and environmental dimensions of nomenclatural trends with an air of somber earnestness. In a rather serendipitous manner, our statistical scrutiny has breathed life into the tangential musings found within works of fiction, with Jhumpa Lahiri's "The Namesake" and Naomi Alderman's "The Power" offering inadvertent yet poignant echoes of our findings, albeit under the veil of literary imaginations.

The staggering correlation coefficient and the minuscule p-value unearthed from our data analysis bespeak a robust association between the popularity of the name Latoya and the biomass power generation in Panama. This not only substantiates the seemingly tenuous connection between personal nomenclature and environmental pursuits but also infuses a touch of levity into this hitherto incongruous union. The whimsical convergence of cultural nomenclature and ecological innovation, brought to the fore by our study, opens a veritable Pandora's box of mirthful contemplations and fosters a newfound appreciation for the enigmatic interplay of societal naming trends and environmental endeavors.

However, it must be noted that while our findings have, perhaps unexpectedly, flourished within this uncharted territory, the underlying mechanisms governing this correlation remain shrouded in tantalizing obscurity. Additional research is warranted to unravel the clandestine underpinnings of this buoyant interplay, as we endeavor to transform this convergence of seemingly disparate variables into a domain of empirical scrutiny and scholarly appreciation.

The revelatory nature of this study not only accentuates the stimulating potential for unconventional interdisciplinary exploration but also underscores the exquisite intrigue embedded within ostensibly unrelated domains. As we tread the uncharted terrain between the ebullient charisma of the name Latoya and the verdant landscapes of Panama, a lighthearted schism emerges within the confines of statistical analysis, elevating our scholarly pursuits to an unforeseen plane of whimsy and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Latoya and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavored to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Latoya among newborns in the United States and the biomass power generated in the lush landscapes of Panama. We harnessed the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration to trace the trajectory of the moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021 and correlated it with the biomass power production statistics obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

Our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by a staggeringly low p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between the two ostensibly disparate variables. We charted the undulating popularity of the name Latoya and juxtaposed it with the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the tropical haven of Panama.

Our findings not only suggest a bountiful synergy between the nomenclature of Latoya and the sustainable energy pursuits in Panama but also hint at the cryptic interplay of cultural influences and environmental initiatives. While the causative mechanisms behind this quirky correlation remain to be deciphered, this study sheds lighthearted light on a curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has long captivated the inquisitive minds of researchers, offering an intriguing lens through which to explore the intriguing dance between societal trends and ecological dynamics. In this study, we aim to unravel an unexpected and arguably peculiar connection between the prevalence of the first name Latoya and the production of biomass power in the tropical paradise of Panama.
While traditionally, studies investigating the correlation between personal names and societal trends have focused on more conventional metrics such as economic indicators or cultural influences, the association between the choice of the name Latoya and biomass power generation presents a refreshing departure from the norms. As we delve into this unconventional correlation, we uncover a peculiar synchrony that prompts us to ponder the potential underlying forces at play.
The captivating allure of the name Latoya, with its melodic cadence and distinctive flair, has traversed the landscapes of the United States, leaving a resounding impression on generations past and present. Simultaneously, the verdant terrains of Panama have witnessed the burgeoning growth of biomass power generation, tapping into the wealth of organic resources to fuel sustainable energy endeavors. Our research aims to shed light on the surprising harmony between these seemingly disconnected phenomena and perhaps inject a touch of levity into the traditionally staid realm of statistical analysis.
As we embark on this whimsical exploration, we invite the reader to partake in an intellectual jaunt that meanders through the annals of nomenclatural trends and ecological ingenuity. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we endeavor to elucidate the enigmatic relationship between the vivacious moniker Latoya and the burgeoning bioenergy landscape in Panama. Stay tuned for the unfolding revelations that promise to intertwine statistical acumen with a dash of mirth in our pursuit of unraveling this charming conundrum.

[[RESULTS]]
The rigorous statistical analysis of the prevalence of the first name Latoya in the United States and the production of biomass power in Panama yielded remarkable insights. We found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by an r-squared of 0.7364478. The associated p-value, impressively low at less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Upon plotting the data, as depicted in Fig. 1, a clear and compelling relationship emerged, manifesting as a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the name Latoya and the biomass power generation in Panama over the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The scatterplot vividly portrays the synchronous undulation of these variables, revealing a remarkably cohesive trend.
Our findings not only attest to the statistical significance of this correlation but also invite whimsical ponderings on the interplay of social conventions and environmental pursuits. The buoyant resonance of the first name Latoya in the United States appears to harmonize with the burgeoning growth of biomass power generation in the lush landscapes of Panama, encapsulating a delightful fusion of cultural nomenclature and ecological innovation.
While the precise mechanisms underpinning this intriguing connection remain cloaked in enigma, this study offers a lighthearted glimpse into the potential interweaving of societal naming trends and environmental endeavors, adding a touch of mirth to the oftentimes sober realm of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed an unexpectedly robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Latoya and biomass power generation in Panama, shedding light on the curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological pursuits. The pronounced correlation coefficient and impressively low p-value propel this seemingly whimsical exploration into the realm of statistical significance. The synchronicity between the undulating popularity of the vivacious moniker Latoya and the burgeoning bioenergy landscape in Panama offers a quirky juxtaposition of cultural influences and environmental initiatives.

One cannot help but marvel at the intriguing dance between the melodic cadence of Latoya and the sustainable energy endeavors in the verdant tropics of Panama. As we contemplate the implications of our findings, one is reminded of the adage, "What's in a name?" Yet, it appears that in this instance, quite a substantial connection emerges, provoking a chorus of bemused ponderings.

While our research offers captivating insights, the enigmatic underpinnings of this correlation beckon for further examination. Nevertheless, we declare with tongue firmly in cheek that no more research is needed in this comical realm of inquiry, for it is a domain where statistical analysis meets the whimsical world of nomenclature, leaving us with a delightful conundrum that tickles the intellect and the funny bone in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Biomass Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Association for Biomass Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lively Latoyas and Lumber: Exploring the Link Between Latoya's Popularity and Panama's Biomass Power Generation with an abstract of This study endeavored to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the first name Latoya among newborns in the United States and the biomass power generated in the lush landscapes of Panama. We harnessed the comprehensive dataset from the US Social Security Administration to trace the trajectory of the moniker Latoya from 1980 to 2021 and correlated it with the biomass power production statistics obtained from the Energy Information Administration.
Our analysis unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8581653, accompanied by a staggeringly low p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between the two ostensibly disparate variables. We charted the undulating popularity of the name Latoya and juxtaposed it with the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the tropical haven of Panama.
Our findings not only suggest a bountiful synergy between the nomenclature of Latoya and the sustainable energy pursuits in Panama but also hint at the cryptic interplay of cultural influences and environmental initiatives. While the causative mechanisms behind this quirky correlation remain to be deciphered, this study sheds lighthearted light on a curious confluence of nomenclatural trends and ecological endeavors.

ChatGPT:

Latoya, biomass power generation, United States Social Security Administration dataset, correlation coefficient, Energy Information Administration statistics, Latoya's popularity, newborn names, biomass power production, cultural influences, environmental initiatives

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Latoya
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Latoya
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Latoya

Biomass power generated in Panama
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Panama in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Panama

Correlation r = 0.8581653 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7364478 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Panama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Latoya) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.8E-13. 0.0000000000003787306625454867
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 3.8E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,640,398,834,567 random variables You don't actually need 2 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Latoya (Babies born)2516428032083158506934212548216518221471112381058037722016513411177836864604367515655333646282921262113201715150
Biomass power generated in Panama (Billion kWh)0.0420.1440.1610.1410.1440.0970.1050.0960.1280.0680.0560.040.0460.0420.0280.0150.0180.0210.0230.0290.0240.0230.0180.0210.0240.0230.0720.0760.0160.0230.0220.0230.0240.0320.0290.0310.0310.040.050.0520.0620.0624941




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2516,4280,3208,3158,5069,3421,2548,2165,1822,1471,1123,810,580,377,220,165,134,111,77,83,68,64,60,43,67,51,56,55,33,36,46,28,29,21,26,21,13,20,17,15,15,0,])
array_2 = np.array([0.042,0.144,0.161,0.141,0.144,0.097,0.105,0.096,0.128,0.068,0.056,0.04,0.046,0.042,0.028,0.015,0.018,0.021,0.023,0.029,0.024,0.023,0.018,0.021,0.024,0.023,0.072,0.076,0.016,0.023,0.022,0.023,0.024,0.032,0.029,0.031,0.031,0.04,0.05,0.052,0.062,0.0624941,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Latoya"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Panama"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1550 · Black Variable ID: 4195 · Red Variable ID: 23889
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0