Download png, svg
AI explanation
The soybeans became so ridiculously photogenic that people couldn't even handle it. #GMOgoalsModel: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a Wisconsin soybean field where a farmer is inspecting vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants. In the background, a person sits on a tractor, holding a smartphone and typing "I cant even" into a Google search, expressing frustration. The image should exude the contrast between the marvel of agricultural innovation and the modern realities of technological reliance. Capture the lush greenery of the soybean field and the subtle disconnection of the individual amidst nature. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art A TIME magazine cover image Cyber folk Minimalism Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Wisconsin soybean field, a farmer is examining the vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants. Nearby, a person sits on a tractor with a smartphone in hand, frustratedly typing "I cant even" into a Google search.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a Wisconsin soybean field, a farmer is examining the vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants. Nearby, a person sits on a tractor with a smartphone in hand, frustratedly typing "I cant even" into a Google search. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a Wisconsin soybean field where a farmer is inspecting vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants. In the background, a person sits on a tractor, holding a smartphone and typing "I cant even" into a Google search, expressing frustration. The image should exude the contrast between the marvel of agricultural innovation and the modern realities of technological reliance. Capture the lush greenery of the soybean field and the subtle disconnection of the individual amidst nature.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.
AI academic paper
Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8648722 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the whimsical relationship between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of 'I Cant Even' searches on Google. Combining USDA data on GMO soybean usage with Google Trends information, we discovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a coefficient of 0.8648722 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. This paper sheds light on the playful, yet intriguing, connection between agricultural practices and internet memes, and dares to ask the question: Do genetically modified soybeans make people say, "I can't even"?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the whimsical relationship between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of 'I Cant Even' searches on Google. Combining USDA data on GMO soybean usage with Google Trends information, we discovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a coefficient of 0.8648722 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. This paper sheds light on the playful, yet intriguing, connection between agricultural practices and internet memes, and dares to ask the question: Do genetically modified soybeans make people say, "I can't even"?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Soy you want to know about the connection between genetically modified soybeans and the phrase "I can't even"? Well, hold on to your edamame, because this research paper is about to spill the beans on a correlation that will make you say, "soy it ain't so!"
In the ever-evolving world of agriculture, the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has stirred up quite the controversy. Meanwhile, the world of internet culture has its own quirks, including the rise of the catchphrase "I can't even" as a humorous way to express incredulity. Now, what do these two seemingly unrelated domains have in common? It turns out, more than you might think!
The aim of this paper is to soy-nd a connection between the adoption of GMO soybeans in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on Google. You might think, "What's the soyence behind this correlation?" Well, you're in for a treat, because we're about to dive into the soy-beta of GMO usage and internet lingo.
As researchers, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we're thinking outside the pod! By combining data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on GMO soybean adoption in Wisconsin with Google Trends data on "I can't even" searches, we have cooked up some soy-ful findings that will make you bean-d your head with curiosity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a roller-coaster ride through the fields of agriculture and the world wide web, as we explore whether GMO soybeans are causing people to reach the soy-burnout stage and exclaim, "I can't even!" And remember, when it comes to this research, we don't spill the beans lightly - but we do soy-ly promise to keep you entertained and informed!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the whimsical relationship between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of 'I Cant Even' searches on Google. Combining USDA data on GMO soybean usage with Google Trends information, we discovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a coefficient of 0.8648722 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. This paper sheds light on the playful, yet intriguing, connection between agricultural practices and internet memes, and dares to ask the question: Do genetically modified soybeans make people say, "I can't even"?
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Soy you want to know about the connection between genetically modified soybeans and the phrase "I can't even"? Well, hold on to your edamame, because this research paper is about to spill the beans on a correlation that will make you say, "soy it ain't so!"
In the ever-evolving world of agriculture, the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has stirred up quite the controversy. Meanwhile, the world of internet culture has its own quirks, including the rise of the catchphrase "I can't even" as a humorous way to express incredulity. Now, what do these two seemingly unrelated domains have in common? It turns out, more than you might think!
The aim of this paper is to soy-nd a connection between the adoption of GMO soybeans in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on Google. You might think, "What's the soyence behind this correlation?" Well, you're in for a treat, because we're about to dive into the soy-beta of GMO usage and internet lingo.
As researchers, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we're thinking outside the pod! By combining data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on GMO soybean adoption in Wisconsin with Google Trends data on "I can't even" searches, we have cooked up some soy-ful findings that will make you bean-d your head with curiosity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a roller-coaster ride through the fields of agriculture and the world wide web, as we explore whether GMO soybeans are causing people to reach the soy-burnout stage and exclaim, "I can't even!" And remember, when it comes to this research, we don't spill the beans lightly - but we do soy-ly promise to keep you entertained and informed!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The vast expanse of literature on genetically modified soybeans and internet culture is as rich and diverse as a soy field on a sunny day. In "Genetically Modified Soybeans: A Review of Current Research," Smith et al. delve into the agronomic, economic, and environmental aspects of GMO soybeans, providing a comprehensive overview of their adoption and impact on agricultural practices. Similarly, Doe's "The Soybean Saga: From Farm to Table" offers a detailed examination of soybean cultivation and its implications for food production. While these scholarly works offer valuable insights into the world of soybeans, our study takes a lighthearted approach by venturing into uncharted territories of internet vernacular.
Moving from the serious to the whimsical, let's not forget the insights we can gain from non-fiction books such as "The Googlization of Everything" by Siva Vaidhyanathan and "iGen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy — And Completely Unprepared for Adulthood" by Jean M. Twenge. While these works may not directly address GMO soybeans or 'I Cant Even' searches, they offer valuable perspectives on the intersection of technology, culture, and human behavior in the digital age. Who would've thought that an examination of internet memes and genetically modified crops could overlap with the musings of contemporary literary authors?
On the fictional front, the works of literature also offer intriguing parallels to our research. Take, for instance, Jeff VanderMeer's "Annihilation," where the characters encounter an environment that defies conventional norms, much like the unforeseen correlation we explore in this study. Additionally, the dystopian tale "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley presents a world where genetic modification has far-reaching consequences—a theme that resonates with our investigation into the effects of GMO soybeans.
In the realm of internet culture, we cannot overlook the impact of popular memes such as "I Can't Even," which has permeated social media platforms and everyday conversations. From the trend of sharing relatable content to the use of humorous expressions, internet memes have become a digital language of their own, reflecting societal attitudes and expressions of exasperation.
As we navigate through the scholarly, fictional, and digital landscapes, it becomes evident that our study sits at the intersection of serious inquiry and light-hearted exploration, fusing the realms of agriculture, technology, and pop culture into a soy-stainable blend of soybeans and internet jargon.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the whimsical relationship between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of 'I Cant Even' searches on Google. Combining USDA data on GMO soybean usage with Google Trends information, we discovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a coefficient of 0.8648722 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. This paper sheds light on the playful, yet intriguing, connection between agricultural practices and internet memes, and dares to ask the question: Do genetically modified soybeans make people say, "I can't even"?
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Soy you want to know about the connection between genetically modified soybeans and the phrase "I can't even"? Well, hold on to your edamame, because this research paper is about to spill the beans on a correlation that will make you say, "soy it ain't so!"
In the ever-evolving world of agriculture, the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has stirred up quite the controversy. Meanwhile, the world of internet culture has its own quirks, including the rise of the catchphrase "I can't even" as a humorous way to express incredulity. Now, what do these two seemingly unrelated domains have in common? It turns out, more than you might think!
The aim of this paper is to soy-nd a connection between the adoption of GMO soybeans in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on Google. You might think, "What's the soyence behind this correlation?" Well, you're in for a treat, because we're about to dive into the soy-beta of GMO usage and internet lingo.
As researchers, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we're thinking outside the pod! By combining data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on GMO soybean adoption in Wisconsin with Google Trends data on "I can't even" searches, we have cooked up some soy-ful findings that will make you bean-d your head with curiosity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a roller-coaster ride through the fields of agriculture and the world wide web, as we explore whether GMO soybeans are causing people to reach the soy-burnout stage and exclaim, "I can't even!" And remember, when it comes to this research, we don't spill the beans lightly - but we do soy-ly promise to keep you entertained and informed!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unearth the soy-nificant connection between GMO soybeans and the "I Can't Even" phenomenon, our research team engaged in a cornucopia of data collection and analysis techniques, aiming to soy-strain any relevant findings from the statistical chaff. Our methods may be as unexpected as finding a soy-milk carton in the dairy aisle, but rest assured, they were crafted with scholarly rigor (and a sprinkle of whimsy).
First, let's talk about data collection. We gathered USDA statistics on the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. With our bushel of GMO data in hand, we then turned to Google Trends - the digital pulse of the masses. We inventoried and analyzed search volume data for the term "I Can't Even" in the same time frame, ensuring that no soy-litary hilarious search query slipped through the cracks.
Ah, but this is where things get spicy! While our research may appear to be as straightforward as laying out rows of soybeans in a field, we decided to take a detour through the maze of statistical analysis. We employed a blend of time series analysis, regression modeling, and data visualization techniques, akin to creating a soy-caccino masterpiece with just the right balance of beans and foam. The goal was to explore any soy-prizing patterns and trends that might lurk beneath the surface of our data, much like unearthing a hidden soy-burgine amidst a sprawling soybean field.
As we toiled over our data, we kept a keen eye on the principles of causation and correlation, mindful of the inherent complexities of inferring meaning from a seemingly unrelated pair of variables. Just like cultivating a bountiful harvest, our aim was to cultivate insights that were rooted in sound statistical reasoning and agricultural acumen, albeit with a side of tongue-in-cheek humor.
In horticultural terms, our approach may have resembled orchestrating an intricate choreography of pollinators in a soybean field, as we sought to cross-pollinate insights from agriculture with the whimsical world of meme culture.
Ultimately, our methodology may have been as unpredictable as the sprouting of a rogue soybean plant in unexpected places, yet we are confident that it has allowed us to harvest a crop of soy-ful and statistically robust findings that will leave scientists and casual observers alike saying, "I can't even!" Well, almost.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .
For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8648722, r-squared of 0.7480039, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the whimsical relationship between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of 'I Cant Even' searches on Google. Combining USDA data on GMO soybean usage with Google Trends information, we discovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a coefficient of 0.8648722 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. This paper sheds light on the playful, yet intriguing, connection between agricultural practices and internet memes, and dares to ask the question: Do genetically modified soybeans make people say, "I can't even"?
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Soy you want to know about the connection between genetically modified soybeans and the phrase "I can't even"? Well, hold on to your edamame, because this research paper is about to spill the beans on a correlation that will make you say, "soy it ain't so!"
In the ever-evolving world of agriculture, the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has stirred up quite the controversy. Meanwhile, the world of internet culture has its own quirks, including the rise of the catchphrase "I can't even" as a humorous way to express incredulity. Now, what do these two seemingly unrelated domains have in common? It turns out, more than you might think!
The aim of this paper is to soy-nd a connection between the adoption of GMO soybeans in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on Google. You might think, "What's the soyence behind this correlation?" Well, you're in for a treat, because we're about to dive into the soy-beta of GMO usage and internet lingo.
As researchers, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we're thinking outside the pod! By combining data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on GMO soybean adoption in Wisconsin with Google Trends data on "I can't even" searches, we have cooked up some soy-ful findings that will make you bean-d your head with curiosity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a roller-coaster ride through the fields of agriculture and the world wide web, as we explore whether GMO soybeans are causing people to reach the soy-burnout stage and exclaim, "I can't even!" And remember, when it comes to this research, we don't spill the beans lightly - but we do soy-ly promise to keep you entertained and informed!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study unveiled a curiously strong correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of "I can't even" searches on Google. The soybean-Google relationship turned out to be more than a tem-"soy"-rary coincidence, with a pear-ingly high coefficient of 0.8648722 and an r-squared value of 0.7480039, suggesting that approximately 75% of the variation in "I can't even" searches can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans. Our p-value, twinkling at less than 0.01, adds an extra splash of statistical significance to this already remarkable finding.
Just as soybeans grow in fields, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) blossomed into a vibrant demonstration of this relationship. The data points, like soybeans in a sprawling farm, clustered tightly together, expressing a synergy that couldn't be ignored. It seemed as though the soybeans were whispering "I can't even" into the ears of internet users across Wisconsin, leaving researchers scratching their heads and exclaiming, "Soy could this be?"
On a more serious note, this unexpected association between soybeans and humorous internet vernacular presents a compelling topic for further investigation. It may leave some wondering if GMO soybeans have the ability to "bean-d" and influence popular culture, or if internet users are simply expressing their amazement at soy-based innovations.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a thought-provoking relationship between GMO soybeans and "I can't even" searches, fueling the idea that agriculture and internet culture may have more in common than meets the soy. This study opens the door to a soy-larly fascinating avenue of inquiry and invites researchers to ponder the profound impact of agricultural practices on internet expression. The "soy" in this research may be of a playful nature, but the implications are anything but "soy-rious." With these findings, we dare to say that genetically modified soybeans have a real "kernel" of influence in shaping internet language and humor.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the whimsical relationship between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of 'I Cant Even' searches on Google. Combining USDA data on GMO soybean usage with Google Trends information, we discovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a coefficient of 0.8648722 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. This paper sheds light on the playful, yet intriguing, connection between agricultural practices and internet memes, and dares to ask the question: Do genetically modified soybeans make people say, "I can't even"?
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The vast expanse of literature on genetically modified soybeans and internet culture is as rich and diverse as a soy field on a sunny day. In "Genetically Modified Soybeans: A Review of Current Research," Smith et al. delve into the agronomic, economic, and environmental aspects of GMO soybeans, providing a comprehensive overview of their adoption and impact on agricultural practices. Similarly, Doe's "The Soybean Saga: From Farm to Table" offers a detailed examination of soybean cultivation and its implications for food production. While these scholarly works offer valuable insights into the world of soybeans, our study takes a lighthearted approach by venturing into uncharted territories of internet vernacular.
Moving from the serious to the whimsical, let's not forget the insights we can gain from non-fiction books such as "The Googlization of Everything" by Siva Vaidhyanathan and "iGen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy — And Completely Unprepared for Adulthood" by Jean M. Twenge. While these works may not directly address GMO soybeans or 'I Cant Even' searches, they offer valuable perspectives on the intersection of technology, culture, and human behavior in the digital age. Who would've thought that an examination of internet memes and genetically modified crops could overlap with the musings of contemporary literary authors?
On the fictional front, the works of literature also offer intriguing parallels to our research. Take, for instance, Jeff VanderMeer's "Annihilation," where the characters encounter an environment that defies conventional norms, much like the unforeseen correlation we explore in this study. Additionally, the dystopian tale "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley presents a world where genetic modification has far-reaching consequences—a theme that resonates with our investigation into the effects of GMO soybeans.
In the realm of internet culture, we cannot overlook the impact of popular memes such as "I Can't Even," which has permeated social media platforms and everyday conversations. From the trend of sharing relatable content to the use of humorous expressions, internet memes have become a digital language of their own, reflecting societal attitudes and expressions of exasperation.
As we navigate through the scholarly, fictional, and digital landscapes, it becomes evident that our study sits at the intersection of serious inquiry and light-hearted exploration, fusing the realms of agriculture, technology, and pop culture into a soy-stainable blend of soybeans and internet jargon.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study unveiled a curiously strong correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of "I can't even" searches on Google. The soybean-Google relationship turned out to be more than a tem-"soy"-rary coincidence, with a pear-ingly high coefficient of 0.8648722 and an r-squared value of 0.7480039, suggesting that approximately 75% of the variation in "I can't even" searches can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans. Our p-value, twinkling at less than 0.01, adds an extra splash of statistical significance to this already remarkable finding.
Just as soybeans grow in fields, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) blossomed into a vibrant demonstration of this relationship. The data points, like soybeans in a sprawling farm, clustered tightly together, expressing a synergy that couldn't be ignored. It seemed as though the soybeans were whispering "I can't even" into the ears of internet users across Wisconsin, leaving researchers scratching their heads and exclaiming, "Soy could this be?"
On a more serious note, this unexpected association between soybeans and humorous internet vernacular presents a compelling topic for further investigation. It may leave some wondering if GMO soybeans have the ability to "bean-d" and influence popular culture, or if internet users are simply expressing their amazement at soy-based innovations.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a thought-provoking relationship between GMO soybeans and "I can't even" searches, fueling the idea that agriculture and internet culture may have more in common than meets the soy. This study opens the door to a soy-larly fascinating avenue of inquiry and invites researchers to ponder the profound impact of agricultural practices on internet expression. The "soy" in this research may be of a playful nature, but the implications are anything but "soy-rious." With these findings, we dare to say that genetically modified soybeans have a real "kernel" of influence in shaping internet language and humor.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study have left us with a soy-perbly interesting conundrum. The correlation we found between GMO soybean adoption in Wisconsin and the frequency of "I can't even" searches on Google raises a number of intriguing questions. So, let's "plant" the seeds of discussion and see what sprouts up!
Our findings bolster the existing literature that has explored the impact of agricultural practices on societal expression. From Smith et al.'s comprehensive examination of GMO soybeans to VanderMeer's "Annihilation," which delves into environments that defy conventional norms, our results provide a startlingly serious confirmation of an initially far-fetched idea. The statistical significance of our findings gives us "bean" for thought and emphasizes the soy-coincidental connection between agriculture and internet culture.
While it may seem like we've stumbled upon a "soy-prising" discovery, it's worth noting that our results offer a playful yet thought-provoking entry point for further studies. The whimsical nature of this correlation invites researchers to "soy" out additional explanations, such as whether GMO soybeans bring about a sense of exasperation that resonates with "I can't even" sentiments, or if there are broader cultural and psychological factors at play. We could say that this mystery is as "soy-stifying" as a soybean labyrinth but nevertheless prompts serious scholarly inquiry.
Moreover, our study opens the door to considering the profound implications of agricultural practices on the digital landscape. Could it be that soybeans, GMO or otherwise, hold the "seeds" of influence over internet vernacular? Or perhaps internet users in Wisconsin are simply expressing their awe at the soybean's versatility. As researchers, we find ourselves caught in a "soy-ful" dilemma, balancing the amusing nature of our findings with their potential implications for understanding the interplay between agricultural innovations and modern communication.
In conclusion, the unexpected connection we've uncovered inspires us to re-"soy"-nate on the intricate dynamics between seemingly disparate domains. As we entertain the idea of soybeans shaping internet jargon, we're reminded that scholarly exploration can sprout from the most unexpected sources. In the spirit of this study, we eagerly await further research to "soy-ak" truth to the soybean-Google relationship and uncover the depths of its impact.
The "soy-nami" of possibilities stemming from our findings encourages us to keep an open mind and embrace the "soy-se" of discovery as we unravel the playful yet thought-provoking mysteries of the soybeans and internet memes.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the whimsical relationship between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of 'I Cant Even' searches on Google. Combining USDA data on GMO soybean usage with Google Trends information, we discovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a coefficient of 0.8648722 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. This paper sheds light on the playful, yet intriguing, connection between agricultural practices and internet memes, and dares to ask the question: Do genetically modified soybeans make people say, "I can't even"?
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Soy you want to know about the connection between genetically modified soybeans and the phrase "I can't even"? Well, hold on to your edamame, because this research paper is about to spill the beans on a correlation that will make you say, "soy it ain't so!"
In the ever-evolving world of agriculture, the introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has stirred up quite the controversy. Meanwhile, the world of internet culture has its own quirks, including the rise of the catchphrase "I can't even" as a humorous way to express incredulity. Now, what do these two seemingly unrelated domains have in common? It turns out, more than you might think!
The aim of this paper is to soy-nd a connection between the adoption of GMO soybeans in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on Google. You might think, "What's the soyence behind this correlation?" Well, you're in for a treat, because we're about to dive into the soy-beta of GMO usage and internet lingo.
As researchers, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we're thinking outside the pod! By combining data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on GMO soybean adoption in Wisconsin with Google Trends data on "I can't even" searches, we have cooked up some soy-ful findings that will make you bean-d your head with curiosity.
So, buckle up and get ready for a roller-coaster ride through the fields of agriculture and the world wide web, as we explore whether GMO soybeans are causing people to reach the soy-burnout stage and exclaim, "I can't even!" And remember, when it comes to this research, we don't spill the beans lightly - but we do soy-ly promise to keep you entertained and informed!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study unveiled a curiously strong correlation between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of "I can't even" searches on Google. The soybean-Google relationship turned out to be more than a tem-"soy"-rary coincidence, with a pear-ingly high coefficient of 0.8648722 and an r-squared value of 0.7480039, suggesting that approximately 75% of the variation in "I can't even" searches can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans. Our p-value, twinkling at less than 0.01, adds an extra splash of statistical significance to this already remarkable finding.
Just as soybeans grow in fields, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) blossomed into a vibrant demonstration of this relationship. The data points, like soybeans in a sprawling farm, clustered tightly together, expressing a synergy that couldn't be ignored. It seemed as though the soybeans were whispering "I can't even" into the ears of internet users across Wisconsin, leaving researchers scratching their heads and exclaiming, "Soy could this be?"
On a more serious note, this unexpected association between soybeans and humorous internet vernacular presents a compelling topic for further investigation. It may leave some wondering if GMO soybeans have the ability to "bean-d" and influence popular culture, or if internet users are simply expressing their amazement at soy-based innovations.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a thought-provoking relationship between GMO soybeans and "I can't even" searches, fueling the idea that agriculture and internet culture may have more in common than meets the soy. This study opens the door to a soy-larly fascinating avenue of inquiry and invites researchers to ponder the profound impact of agricultural practices on internet expression. The "soy" in this research may be of a playful nature, but the implications are anything but "soy-rious." With these findings, we dare to say that genetically modified soybeans have a real "kernel" of influence in shaping internet language and humor.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
So, there you have it - our study reveals a soy-ful relationship between GMO soybeans and "I can't even" searches. It seems that soybeans are not just a staple in agriculture but also in internet humor! This discovery leaves us soy-prised and begs the question: are these soybeans planting puns in our minds, or are internet users just bean-ding their sense of humor? It's a question as old as the soybean itself. But fear not, fellow researchers, for in our soy-journ, we have reached the "stalk" of our findings and can confidently declare a "soy long" to any further investigation in this area. The bean-dwagon has left the building!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Quirky Agricultural Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches with an abstract of In this study, we examine the whimsical relationship between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Wisconsin and the frequency of 'I Cant Even' searches on Google. Combining USDA data on GMO soybean usage with Google Trends information, we discovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a coefficient of 0.8648722 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2022. This paper sheds light on the playful, yet intriguing, connection between agricultural practices and internet memes, and dares to ask the question: Do genetically modified soybeans make people say, "I can't even"?
ChatGPT:
genetically modified soybeans, Wisconsin, GMO usage, Google searches, 'I Cant Even', correlation, USDA data, internet memes, agricultural practices, soybean adoption, Google Trends, coefficient, statistical significance
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GMO use in soybeans in WisconsinDetailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Wisconsin that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin
Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7480039 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-6. 0.0000017693339312156193000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.00018% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 565,184 random variables You don't actually need 565 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.68, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin (GMO soybeans %) | 82 | 84 | 85 | 88 | 90 | 85 | 88 | 91 | 92 | 89 | 95 | 93 | 94 | 92 | 92 | 91 | 89 | 91 | 92 |
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume) | 11.8333 | 24 | 33.5833 | 32 | 34.75 | 37.5 | 60.25 | 63.3333 | 54.3333 | 63.25 | 70.8333 | 74.75 | 71.1667 | 72.4167 | 63 | 55.9167 | 64.0833 | 65 | 72.0833 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([82,84,85,88,90,85,88,91,92,89,95,93,94,92,92,91,89,91,92,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GMO use in soybeans in Wisconsin
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'i cant even'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Soy Can't Even GMO: The Link Between Genetically Modified Soybeans in Wisconsin and 'I Cant Even' Google Searches
Kudos for rating!
Correlation ID: 1501 · Black Variable ID: 826 · Red Variable ID: 1525