about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,494 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Wind power generated in Bulgaria and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to make baby'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in Wind power generated in Bulgaria has led to a surge in energy, creating a more charged atmosphere, and, well, it seems that people are just feeling a little more 'revved up' to learn about making babies. Looks like those Bulgarian winds are blowing in some extra baby-making inspiration! Plus, who wouldn't be in the mood for a little 'turbine and romance' with all that power buzzing around?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a rustic, steampunk-inspired wind turbine standing tall in the rolling hills of Bulgaria, with its weathered blades catching the breeze. In the foreground, a person in steampunk attire is holding a vintage-looking smartphone, furiously typing a query into the search engine: "how to make baby." Capture the juxtaposition of old and new technologies against the picturesque landscape. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism Glitch art Steampunk Voxel art Psychedelic
ChatGPT: Steampunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A wind turbine spinning gracefully against the backdrop of the Bulgarian landscape, while a person uses their smartphone to search "how to make baby" on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Steampunk ] and depicting this scene: A wind turbine spinning gracefully against the backdrop of the Bulgarian landscape, while a person uses their smartphone to search "how to make baby" on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a rustic, steampunk-inspired wind turbine standing tall in the rolling hills of Bulgaria, with its weathered blades catching the breeze. In the foreground, a person in steampunk attire is holding a vintage-looking smartphone, furiously typing a query into the search engine: "how to make baby." Capture the juxtaposition of old and new technologies against the picturesque landscape.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Wind power generated in Bulgaria caused how to make baby (Google searches for 'how to make baby') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior

International Journal of Windy Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior

[[ABSTRACT]]
This pioneering research investigates the unexpected connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the fervent Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2021, revealing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we demonstrate a striking parallel between the increase in wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in searches related to procreation. The findings unveil a windy wave of creativity in the realm of renewable energy, as well as an intriguing link to reproductive curiosity. This study not only sheds light on the intricacies of human behavior but also breezily navigates through the wind power landscape, promising to blow away conventional wisdom in both domains. The correlation between wind power and the quest for baby-making tips creates a whirlwind of insights that will leave both researchers and readers breathless.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior

[[ABSTRACT]]
This pioneering research investigates the unexpected connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the fervent Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2021, revealing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we demonstrate a striking parallel between the increase in wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in searches related to procreation. The findings unveil a windy wave of creativity in the realm of renewable energy, as well as an intriguing link to reproductive curiosity. This study not only sheds light on the intricacies of human behavior but also breezily navigates through the wind power landscape, promising to blow away conventional wisdom in both domains. The correlation between wind power and the quest for baby-making tips creates a whirlwind of insights that will leave both researchers and readers breathless.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of renewable energy and human behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, similar to combining a gust of wind with a hopeful nursery rhyme of "hush, little baby." Nevertheless, our in-depth investigation reveals a tantalizing correlation between wind power generated in Bulgaria and the enthusiastic Google searches for 'how to make baby'. This study presents an unconventional harmony between the breezy business of wind energy and the spirited pursuit of procreation, prompting us to take a closer look at the winds of change and the quest for new beginnings.

While the idea of wind power acting as a catalyst for an increased interest in baby-making may initially elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, we assure the reader that this study is grounded in robust statistical analysis and a rigorous examination of the data. We have carefully scrutinized the trends, crunched the numbers, and found ourselves blown away by the unexpected correlation—much like a tumbleweed caught in a sudden gust.

From a theoretical perspective, the theoretical connection between wind power and reproductive curiosity might seem to be as solid as a house of cards in a stiff breeze. However, the empirical evidence we present challenges this notion, offering a fresh perspective that will not only pique the interest of researchers but may also cause a metaphorical wind turbine to spin in the minds of the reader.

As we embark on this journey through the windswept fields of renewable energy and the uncharted territories of online search behavior, we invite the reader to embrace the paradoxical nature of this investigation. Prepare to be swept off your feet by the unexpected correlations and seemingly zephyr-induced phenomena that our study has uncovered. Let's harness the power of data and delve into the whirlwind of discovery that awaits us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior

[[ABSTRACT]]
This pioneering research investigates the unexpected connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the fervent Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2021, revealing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we demonstrate a striking parallel between the increase in wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in searches related to procreation. The findings unveil a windy wave of creativity in the realm of renewable energy, as well as an intriguing link to reproductive curiosity. This study not only sheds light on the intricacies of human behavior but also breezily navigates through the wind power landscape, promising to blow away conventional wisdom in both domains. The correlation between wind power and the quest for baby-making tips creates a whirlwind of insights that will leave both researchers and readers breathless.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of renewable energy and human behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, similar to combining a gust of wind with a hopeful nursery rhyme of "hush, little baby." Nevertheless, our in-depth investigation reveals a tantalizing correlation between wind power generated in Bulgaria and the enthusiastic Google searches for 'how to make baby'. This study presents an unconventional harmony between the breezy business of wind energy and the spirited pursuit of procreation, prompting us to take a closer look at the winds of change and the quest for new beginnings.
While the idea of wind power acting as a catalyst for an increased interest in baby-making may initially elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, we assure the reader that this study is grounded in robust statistical analysis and a rigorous examination of the data. We have carefully scrutinized the trends, crunched the numbers, and found ourselves blown away by the unexpected correlation—much like a tumbleweed caught in a sudden gust.
From a theoretical perspective, the theoretical connection between wind power and reproductive curiosity might seem to be as solid as a house of cards in a stiff breeze. However, the empirical evidence we present challenges this notion, offering a fresh perspective that will not only pique the interest of researchers but may also cause a metaphorical wind turbine to spin in the minds of the reader.
As we embark on this journey through the windswept fields of renewable energy and the uncharted territories of online search behavior, we invite the reader to embrace the paradoxical nature of this investigation. Prepare to be swept off your feet by the unexpected correlations and seemingly zephyr-induced phenomena that our study has uncovered. Let's harness the power of data and delve into the whirlwind of discovery that awaits us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the realm of wind power and its unforeseen influence on human procreative pursuits, significant scholarly attention has been directed towards understanding the potential link between renewable energy sources and reproductive inclinations. Smith et al. (2018) identified a notable positive association between wind power capacity and birth rates in various regions, laying the groundwork for our exploration into this enigmatic intersection. Doe and Jones (2016) delved into the societal impacts of renewable energy initiatives and highlighted a curious uptick in birth announcements coinciding with increases in wind power installations.

Moving beyond the traditional academic literature, we turn our attention to non-fiction works that offer intriguing perspectives on both wind power and fertility. In "The Wind and the Womb" by Dr. Irene Gale, an exploration of the intertwining of wind patterns and fertility rituals throughout history provides a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation. Similarly, "Renewable Romance: A Sustainability Love Story" by Dr. Laura Breeze uncovers the passionate connections between sustainability efforts and human reproductive aspirations.

Turning to the realm of fiction, we encounter works that may not directly address wind power and baby-making but offer parallel themes that evoke a sense of whimsy and relevance to our study. In Gabriel Zephyr's novel "The Whirlwind of Change," the protagonist embarks on a transformative journey that mirrors the unexpected twists and turns of our own investigation. Additionally, the dystopian novel "Gone with the Wind… and Babies!" by Margaret Fertile conjures up a tantalizing vision of a world where wind power and procreation collide in captivating ways.

Furthermore, our exploration extends to the realm of popular culture, where animated series and children's shows offer lighthearted yet surprisingly pertinent insights. The animated series "Gusty Gales and Giggling Infants" playfully portrays the antics of wind-swept characters and their comically intertwined adventures with babies, lending a whimsical touch to our serious inquiry. Additionally, the children's show "Blustery Babies' Breezy Adventures" introduces young audiences to the delightful synergy between wind power and the creation of new life, albeit in a purely fictional and fantastical context.

As we traverse through this multidimensional landscape of literature and cultural influences, our study aims to glean valuable perspectives from both academic discourse and the realm of imagination. With each source offering a unique vantage point, we set the stage for a rich tapestry of insights that promises to captivate and amuse in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior

[[ABSTRACT]]
This pioneering research investigates the unexpected connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the fervent Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2021, revealing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we demonstrate a striking parallel between the increase in wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in searches related to procreation. The findings unveil a windy wave of creativity in the realm of renewable energy, as well as an intriguing link to reproductive curiosity. This study not only sheds light on the intricacies of human behavior but also breezily navigates through the wind power landscape, promising to blow away conventional wisdom in both domains. The correlation between wind power and the quest for baby-making tips creates a whirlwind of insights that will leave both researchers and readers breathless.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of renewable energy and human behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, similar to combining a gust of wind with a hopeful nursery rhyme of "hush, little baby." Nevertheless, our in-depth investigation reveals a tantalizing correlation between wind power generated in Bulgaria and the enthusiastic Google searches for 'how to make baby'. This study presents an unconventional harmony between the breezy business of wind energy and the spirited pursuit of procreation, prompting us to take a closer look at the winds of change and the quest for new beginnings.
While the idea of wind power acting as a catalyst for an increased interest in baby-making may initially elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, we assure the reader that this study is grounded in robust statistical analysis and a rigorous examination of the data. We have carefully scrutinized the trends, crunched the numbers, and found ourselves blown away by the unexpected correlation—much like a tumbleweed caught in a sudden gust.
From a theoretical perspective, the theoretical connection between wind power and reproductive curiosity might seem to be as solid as a house of cards in a stiff breeze. However, the empirical evidence we present challenges this notion, offering a fresh perspective that will not only pique the interest of researchers but may also cause a metaphorical wind turbine to spin in the minds of the reader.
As we embark on this journey through the windswept fields of renewable energy and the uncharted territories of online search behavior, we invite the reader to embrace the paradoxical nature of this investigation. Prepare to be swept off your feet by the unexpected correlations and seemingly zephyr-induced phenomena that our study has uncovered. Let's harness the power of data and delve into the whirlwind of discovery that awaits us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the zealous pursuit of procreation-related knowledge, our research team embarked on a quest that was as tumultuous as a tornado and as intricate as untangling a kite string on a blustery day.

Data on wind power generation in Bulgaria was obtained from the Energy Information Administration, while information on the frequency of Google searches for 'how to make baby' was procured from the illustrious repository of internet trends, Google Trends. The period under scrutiny spanned from 2004 to 2021, allowing us to capture the gusts and whirls of both wind power and baby-making in their full meteorological and demiurgic splendor.

Before delving into the statistical alliances between these seemingly disparate phenomena, we undertook a meticulous process of data cleansing and wrangling. This involved separating the wheat from the chaff, or in the case of wind power, the turbines from the tinkling of wind chimes. Once our data whispered sweet nothings into our algorithms, we proceeded to conduct several statistical analyses to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between wind power generation and the intensity of 'how to make baby' searches.

Firstly, we performed a series of bivariate correlation analyses to gauge the degree of association between these variables. The results were as electrifying as a lightning strike, yielding a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875. To put it in layman's terms, this correlation was tighter than a topological knot and as compelling as a siren's call to sailors navigating the tempestuous seas of data analysis.

Following this, we conducted a time-series analysis to scrutinize the temporal dynamics of this relationship. Our statistical sleuthing revealed that as the winds of change swept through Bulgaria's energy landscape, echoing gusts of wind power were accompanied by an almost synchronous surge in the quest for baby-making wisdom. The statistical significance of this dance between wind power and procreative curiosity was so profound that it left us in awe, much like witnessing a cloud formation that strikingly resembles a stork carrying a newborn.

To quell any skepticism and fortify the robustness of our findings, we engaged in a series of sensitivity analyses and diagnostic checks, ensuring that our results stood firm amidst the swirling currents of mathematical rigor.

In sum, our methodology galvanized the spirit of inquiry and rigor, unearthing a correlation so captivating that it rustled the leaves of skepticism and sowed the seeds of contemplation in the fertile soil of scholarship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9781875, r-squared of 0.9568507, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior

[[ABSTRACT]]
This pioneering research investigates the unexpected connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the fervent Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2021, revealing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we demonstrate a striking parallel between the increase in wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in searches related to procreation. The findings unveil a windy wave of creativity in the realm of renewable energy, as well as an intriguing link to reproductive curiosity. This study not only sheds light on the intricacies of human behavior but also breezily navigates through the wind power landscape, promising to blow away conventional wisdom in both domains. The correlation between wind power and the quest for baby-making tips creates a whirlwind of insights that will leave both researchers and readers breathless.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of renewable energy and human behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, similar to combining a gust of wind with a hopeful nursery rhyme of "hush, little baby." Nevertheless, our in-depth investigation reveals a tantalizing correlation between wind power generated in Bulgaria and the enthusiastic Google searches for 'how to make baby'. This study presents an unconventional harmony between the breezy business of wind energy and the spirited pursuit of procreation, prompting us to take a closer look at the winds of change and the quest for new beginnings.
While the idea of wind power acting as a catalyst for an increased interest in baby-making may initially elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, we assure the reader that this study is grounded in robust statistical analysis and a rigorous examination of the data. We have carefully scrutinized the trends, crunched the numbers, and found ourselves blown away by the unexpected correlation—much like a tumbleweed caught in a sudden gust.
From a theoretical perspective, the theoretical connection between wind power and reproductive curiosity might seem to be as solid as a house of cards in a stiff breeze. However, the empirical evidence we present challenges this notion, offering a fresh perspective that will not only pique the interest of researchers but may also cause a metaphorical wind turbine to spin in the minds of the reader.
As we embark on this journey through the windswept fields of renewable energy and the uncharted territories of online search behavior, we invite the reader to embrace the paradoxical nature of this investigation. Prepare to be swept off your feet by the unexpected correlations and seemingly zephyr-induced phenomena that our study has uncovered. Let's harness the power of data and delve into the whirlwind of discovery that awaits us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our thorough analysis of the data has uncovered an astonishing correlation between wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and an r-squared value of 0.9568507 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis and supports the significance of this association.

The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually depicts the striking correlation observed between the wind power generation and the volume of Google searches related to procreation. The data points are tightly clustered along a clear upward trend line, illustrating the coalescence of wind power and reproductive curiosity.

Our findings not only suggest a parallel increase in the two variables but also point to a potentially influential relationship, as persuasive as a strong gust of wind urging one to act. The synchrony between wind power production and the surge in searches for procreative information exemplifies the whimsical dance of statistical patterns, akin to windblown leaves twirling in harmony.

The implications of this unexpected correlation extend beyond the confines of traditional research boundaries, as this study lifts the veil on the wind-swept landscape of renewable energy and the capricious pathways of online inquiries. The uncanny connection we have unraveled may appear as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack during a cyclone, but our robust statistical analysis leaves little room for doubt.

In conclusion, our findings highlight a compelling linkage between the winds of change in Bulgaria's renewable energy sector and the surge of curiosity regarding procreation, fostering a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We urge our peers to embrace the whimsy of unconventional associations and to contemplate the breezy breeze of statistical significance that has swept us off our feet.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior

[[ABSTRACT]]
This pioneering research investigates the unexpected connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the fervent Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2021, revealing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we demonstrate a striking parallel between the increase in wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in searches related to procreation. The findings unveil a windy wave of creativity in the realm of renewable energy, as well as an intriguing link to reproductive curiosity. This study not only sheds light on the intricacies of human behavior but also breezily navigates through the wind power landscape, promising to blow away conventional wisdom in both domains. The correlation between wind power and the quest for baby-making tips creates a whirlwind of insights that will leave both researchers and readers breathless.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the realm of wind power and its unforeseen influence on human procreative pursuits, significant scholarly attention has been directed towards understanding the potential link between renewable energy sources and reproductive inclinations. Smith et al. (2018) identified a notable positive association between wind power capacity and birth rates in various regions, laying the groundwork for our exploration into this enigmatic intersection. Doe and Jones (2016) delved into the societal impacts of renewable energy initiatives and highlighted a curious uptick in birth announcements coinciding with increases in wind power installations.
Moving beyond the traditional academic literature, we turn our attention to non-fiction works that offer intriguing perspectives on both wind power and fertility. In "The Wind and the Womb" by Dr. Irene Gale, an exploration of the intertwining of wind patterns and fertility rituals throughout history provides a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation. Similarly, "Renewable Romance: A Sustainability Love Story" by Dr. Laura Breeze uncovers the passionate connections between sustainability efforts and human reproductive aspirations.
Turning to the realm of fiction, we encounter works that may not directly address wind power and baby-making but offer parallel themes that evoke a sense of whimsy and relevance to our study. In Gabriel Zephyr's novel "The Whirlwind of Change," the protagonist embarks on a transformative journey that mirrors the unexpected twists and turns of our own investigation. Additionally, the dystopian novel "Gone with the Wind… and Babies!" by Margaret Fertile conjures up a tantalizing vision of a world where wind power and procreation collide in captivating ways.
Furthermore, our exploration extends to the realm of popular culture, where animated series and children's shows offer lighthearted yet surprisingly pertinent insights. The animated series "Gusty Gales and Giggling Infants" playfully portrays the antics of wind-swept characters and their comically intertwined adventures with babies, lending a whimsical touch to our serious inquiry. Additionally, the children's show "Blustery Babies' Breezy Adventures" introduces young audiences to the delightful synergy between wind power and the creation of new life, albeit in a purely fictional and fantastical context.
As we traverse through this multidimensional landscape of literature and cultural influences, our study aims to glean valuable perspectives from both academic discourse and the realm of imagination. With each source offering a unique vantage point, we set the stage for a rich tapestry of insights that promises to captivate and amuse in equal measure.

[[RESULTS]]
Our thorough analysis of the data has uncovered an astonishing correlation between wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and an r-squared value of 0.9568507 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis and supports the significance of this association.
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually depicts the striking correlation observed between the wind power generation and the volume of Google searches related to procreation. The data points are tightly clustered along a clear upward trend line, illustrating the coalescence of wind power and reproductive curiosity.
Our findings not only suggest a parallel increase in the two variables but also point to a potentially influential relationship, as persuasive as a strong gust of wind urging one to act. The synchrony between wind power production and the surge in searches for procreative information exemplifies the whimsical dance of statistical patterns, akin to windblown leaves twirling in harmony.
The implications of this unexpected correlation extend beyond the confines of traditional research boundaries, as this study lifts the veil on the wind-swept landscape of renewable energy and the capricious pathways of online inquiries. The uncanny connection we have unraveled may appear as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack during a cyclone, but our robust statistical analysis leaves little room for doubt.
In conclusion, our findings highlight a compelling linkage between the winds of change in Bulgaria's renewable energy sector and the surge of curiosity regarding procreation, fostering a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We urge our peers to embrace the whimsy of unconventional associations and to contemplate the breezy breeze of statistical significance that has swept us off our feet.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation have blown us away, quite literally, with the compelling evidence of a robust correlation between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in Google searches for 'how to make baby'. These findings not only uphold the prior research by Smith et al. (2018) and Doe and Jones (2016) but also breeze in with a fresh perspective on the whimsical interplay between renewable energy and human procreative inclinations.

The substantial parallel between the increase in wind power production and the surge in online queries related to procreation mirrors the unexpected connections uncovered in various literary and cultural works. Indeed, the surreal intertwining of wind power and fertility rituals, as presented in Dr. Irene Gale's "The Wind and the Womb," appears to manifest in the statistical realm with surprising coherence, reminiscent of a gust seamlessly merging into the gentle rustle of leaves.

Similarly, the non-fiction musings of Dr. Laura Breeze in "Renewable Romance: A Sustainability Love Story" find an unexpected echo in our findings, as they substantiate the amorous links between sustainability efforts and the aspiration for new life. The vibrant and imaginative landscapes of fiction, exemplified in Gabriel Zephyr's "The Whirlwind of Change" and Margaret Fertile's "Gone with the Wind… and Babies!", seem to have materialized in our empirical analysis, bringing forth a captivating narrative of wind power and procreation intertwining in statistical harmony.

Furthermore, the lighthearted yet profound insights offered by animated series and children's shows, as highlighted in our literature review, find validation in our study's resounding affirmation of the unforeseen synergy between wind power and the creation of new life. The windswept characters and comical adventures portrayed in "Gusty Gales and Giggling Infants" appear to have left an indelible mark on our statistical exploration, just as the breezy adventures of "Blustery Babies" have converged with the empirical winds of change in Bulgaria's renewable energy sector.

In light of these whimsical associations, our research not only reinforces the scholarly discourse on wind power and fertility but also underscores the elusive yet captivating nature of statistical relationships. While the unexpected correlation between wind power and procreative curiosity may seem as improbable as a sudden gust of wind in a calm summer's day, our rigorous statistical analysis leaves little room for skepticism and invites a playful contemplation of the breezy breeze of interconnected phenomena.

The wind of statistical significance has indeed swept us off our feet, prompting a renewed appreciation for the capricious nature of empirical inquiry and the unexpected avenues it might traverse. As we navigate this uncharted territory of interconnected winds and curious pursuits, we are reminded that statistical discoveries can be as capricious and whimsical as the winding paths of the wind itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior

[[ABSTRACT]]
This pioneering research investigates the unexpected connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the fervent Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2021, revealing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we demonstrate a striking parallel between the increase in wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in searches related to procreation. The findings unveil a windy wave of creativity in the realm of renewable energy, as well as an intriguing link to reproductive curiosity. This study not only sheds light on the intricacies of human behavior but also breezily navigates through the wind power landscape, promising to blow away conventional wisdom in both domains. The correlation between wind power and the quest for baby-making tips creates a whirlwind of insights that will leave both researchers and readers breathless.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of renewable energy and human behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, similar to combining a gust of wind with a hopeful nursery rhyme of "hush, little baby." Nevertheless, our in-depth investigation reveals a tantalizing correlation between wind power generated in Bulgaria and the enthusiastic Google searches for 'how to make baby'. This study presents an unconventional harmony between the breezy business of wind energy and the spirited pursuit of procreation, prompting us to take a closer look at the winds of change and the quest for new beginnings.
While the idea of wind power acting as a catalyst for an increased interest in baby-making may initially elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, we assure the reader that this study is grounded in robust statistical analysis and a rigorous examination of the data. We have carefully scrutinized the trends, crunched the numbers, and found ourselves blown away by the unexpected correlation—much like a tumbleweed caught in a sudden gust.
From a theoretical perspective, the theoretical connection between wind power and reproductive curiosity might seem to be as solid as a house of cards in a stiff breeze. However, the empirical evidence we present challenges this notion, offering a fresh perspective that will not only pique the interest of researchers but may also cause a metaphorical wind turbine to spin in the minds of the reader.
As we embark on this journey through the windswept fields of renewable energy and the uncharted territories of online search behavior, we invite the reader to embrace the paradoxical nature of this investigation. Prepare to be swept off your feet by the unexpected correlations and seemingly zephyr-induced phenomena that our study has uncovered. Let's harness the power of data and delve into the whirlwind of discovery that awaits us.

[[RESULTS]]
Our thorough analysis of the data has uncovered an astonishing correlation between wind power generated in Bulgaria and Google searches for 'how to make baby'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and an r-squared value of 0.9568507 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis and supports the significance of this association.
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually depicts the striking correlation observed between the wind power generation and the volume of Google searches related to procreation. The data points are tightly clustered along a clear upward trend line, illustrating the coalescence of wind power and reproductive curiosity.
Our findings not only suggest a parallel increase in the two variables but also point to a potentially influential relationship, as persuasive as a strong gust of wind urging one to act. The synchrony between wind power production and the surge in searches for procreative information exemplifies the whimsical dance of statistical patterns, akin to windblown leaves twirling in harmony.
The implications of this unexpected correlation extend beyond the confines of traditional research boundaries, as this study lifts the veil on the wind-swept landscape of renewable energy and the capricious pathways of online inquiries. The uncanny connection we have unraveled may appear as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack during a cyclone, but our robust statistical analysis leaves little room for doubt.
In conclusion, our findings highlight a compelling linkage between the winds of change in Bulgaria's renewable energy sector and the surge of curiosity regarding procreation, fostering a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We urge our peers to embrace the whimsy of unconventional associations and to contemplate the breezy breeze of statistical significance that has swept us off our feet.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our research has not only breezed through the correlation between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the Google searches for 'how to make baby,' but it has also blown away any skepticism regarding this unexpected connection. The gale-force correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01 leaves little room for doubt – it's as clear as a gust of wind on a tranquil day.

Our findings not only demonstrate a striking parallel between the surge in wind power generation and the spike in searches related to procreation but also invite us to ponder the whimsical ways in which seemingly disparate phenomena can intertwine, much like a playful game of leapfrog in a brisk breeze.

While the idea of wind power spurring an increased interest in baby-making may sound like a whimsical fantasy, our rigorous statistical analysis has grounded this phenomenon in solid empirical evidence. Like a mighty wind turbine cutting through the air, our study has unearthed a correlation that promises to buoy the spirits of researchers and readers alike.

In the grand scheme of things, this unlikely correlation serves as a reminder that the winds of change can influence not only the renewable energy landscape but also the curious pathways of human behavior. As we bid farewell to this whirlwind of discovery, we assert that further research in this area is as unnecessary as an umbrella in a gentle breeze.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

International Journal of Windy Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Meteorological and Demographic Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blustery Baby Boom: Bulgaria's Breezy Business and Baby-making Behavior with an abstract of This pioneering research investigates the unexpected connection between wind power generation in Bulgaria and the fervent Google searches for 'how to make baby'. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2021, revealing a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9781875 and p < 0.01.
Through rigorous statistical analysis, we demonstrate a striking parallel between the increase in wind power generation in Bulgaria and the surge in searches related to procreation. The findings unveil a windy wave of creativity in the realm of renewable energy, as well as an intriguing link to reproductive curiosity. This study not only sheds light on the intricacies of human behavior but also breezily navigates through the wind power landscape, promising to blow away conventional wisdom in both domains. The correlation between wind power and the quest for baby-making tips creates a whirlwind of insights that will leave both researchers and readers breathless.

ChatGPT:

Bulgaria, wind power generation, Google searches, how to make baby, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, renewable energy, reproductive curiosity, human behavior, Energy Information Administration, Google Trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Wind power generated in Bulgaria
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Bulgaria in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Bulgaria

Google searches for 'how to make baby'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to make baby' (Worldwide), with quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to make baby'

Correlation r = 0.9781875 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9568507 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to make baby') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Wind power generated in Bulgaria) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.41E-12. 0.0000000000024064965324323134
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 2.41E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 415,541,841,230 random variables You don't actually need 415 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Wind power generated in Bulgaria (Billion kWh)0.0010.0050.020.0470.1220.2370.6810.8611.2211.3741.3311.4521.4251.504071.318121.316991.477131.42116
Google searches for 'how to make baby' (Rel. search volume)20.333318.523.083327.083334.833344.33335560.41677379.916783.7584.833385.083384.577.083372.833378.583369.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.001,0.005,0.02,0.047,0.122,0.237,0.681,0.861,1.221,1.374,1.331,1.452,1.425,1.50407,1.31812,1.31699,1.47713,1.42116,])
array_2 = np.array([20.3333,18.5,23.0833,27.0833,34.8333,44.3333,55,60.4167,73,79.9167,83.75,84.8333,85.0833,84.5,77.0833,72.8333,78.5833,69.0833,])
array_1_name = "Wind power generated in Bulgaria"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to make baby'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1494 · Black Variable ID: 23554 · Red Variable ID: 1497
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0