about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,480 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon increases, so too does the production of condiments and preservatives. These secret sauce ingredients find their way into the competitive eating circuit, fueling record-breaking hot dog consumption. It's a wiener-take-all situation where more operators means more flavor innovation, ultimately leading to a dog-eat-dog competition for the top spot at Nathan's. Who knew that behind every champion, there's a relish-loving workforce in Oregon making it all possible!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A scene from a Pixar movie ] Create an image of this scene: In a bustling chemical plant in Oregon, a champion from Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands proudly, surrounded by a mountain of empty hot dog containers. The plant operators watch in amazement as the champion breaks another world record for the number of hotdogs consumed, while diligently overseeing the plant's systems and operations at the same time. Enhanced version: As Pixar movies often feature vibrant and lively scenes, generate an image of a whimsical and colorful chemical plant in Oregon. The setting should showcase larger-than-life hot dog containers towering around the champion, who exudes a mix of determination and jubilation. The operators and workers should display expressions of awe and admiration, their actions conveying the bustling activity of a working chemical plant. The overall image should capture the energy and excitement of the moment, immersing the viewer in a visually compelling and dynamic portrayal of the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie A scene from Skyrim An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: A scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling chemical plant in Oregon, a champion from Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands proudly, surrounded by a mountain of empty hot dog containers. The plant operators watch in amazement as the champion breaks another world record for the number of hotdogs consumed, while diligently overseeing the plant's systems and operations at the same time.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling chemical plant in Oregon, a champion from Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands proudly, surrounded by a mountain of empty hot dog containers. The plant operators watch in amazement as the champion breaks another world record for the number of hotdogs consumed, while diligently overseeing the plant's systems and operations at the same time. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A scene from a Pixar movie ] Create an image of this scene: In a bustling chemical plant in Oregon, a champion from Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands proudly, surrounded by a mountain of empty hot dog containers. The plant operators watch in amazement as the champion breaks another world record for the number of hotdogs consumed, while diligently overseeing the plant's systems and operations at the same time. Enhanced version: As Pixar movies often feature vibrant and lively scenes, generate an image of a whimsical and colorful chemical plant in Oregon. The setting should showcase larger-than-life hot dog containers towering around the champion, who exudes a mix of determination and jubilation. The operators and workers should display expressions of awe and admiration, their actions conveying the bustling activity of a working chemical plant. The overall image should capture the energy and excitement of the moment, immersing the viewer in a visually compelling and dynamic portrayal of the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

The Journal of Gastronomical Chemistry and Industrial Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7198956 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has long been a topic of speculation and jest in scientific circles. In this study, we delved into this curious correlation using robust data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia. Employing statistical analyses, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from the years 2004 to 2021.

Our investigation revealed a statistically significant association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We speculate that there might be some "frankly" stimulating factors at play, possibly related to the chemicals and condiments that operate as unseen influencers on both fronts. Our findings confirm that this peculiar relationship is not mere "relish" but rather rooted in substantive statistical evidence, adding a dash of sizzle to the ongoing discourse in quirky career choices and competitive eating feats.

In conclusion, as we "relish" these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has long been a topic of speculation and jest in scientific circles. In this study, we delved into this curious correlation using robust data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia. Employing statistical analyses, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from the years 2004 to 2021.

Our investigation revealed a statistically significant association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We speculate that there might be some "frankly" stimulating factors at play, possibly related to the chemicals and condiments that operate as unseen influencers on both fronts. Our findings confirm that this peculiar relationship is not mere "relish" but rather rooted in substantive statistical evidence, adding a dash of sizzle to the ongoing discourse in quirky career choices and competitive eating feats.

In conclusion, as we "relish" these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

While the correlation between the consumption of hotdogs and unusual occupation trends may initially appear as appealing as a plain hotdog with no condiments, our study uncovers a surprising connection that will have you relishing the findings. The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is not just a sausage of speculation, but a scientifically significant wiener-winner revelation. So, grab your mustard and ketchup, because we are about to unravel this spicy relationship.

On the surface, the concept might seem like a "hotdog" of an idea, but as more data sizzles onto the grill, we couldn't help but "relish" the opportunity to investigate this quirky correlation. It's not every day that one gets to explore the intersection of industrial occupations and competitive eating contests, but we are not ones to shy away from a good mystery - even if it's seasoned with some dad jokes.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics provided the meaty employment data, while Wikipedia served up the saucy hotdog-eating information. Through the use of statistical analyses, we managed to mustard up the numbers and resulted in uncovering a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value that's lower than the calories in a single hotdog. Now, that's a correlation hotter than a jalapeno-laden chili dog!

Our findings present a compelling case for a connection between the number of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the colossal consumption of hotdogs by the champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We cannot deny the strong association, suggesting that there might be more to this link than meets the mustard-covered eye. It's almost as if there are some unseen factors at play, perhaps lurking in the backstage of chemical plants and competitive eating stages.

This unexpected and "bun-believable" relationship invites further exploration into the world of industrial careers and competitive eating feats. As we embark on this culinary and occupational journey, we will not only unravel the mysteries of hotdogs and chemical operations but also add some much-needed humor and whimsy into the typically serious and straightforward world of academic research. So, hold onto your hats, and grab a hot dog, because this journey is about to get as spicy as a jalapeno-infused sausage!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has long been a topic of speculation and jest in scientific circles. In this study, we delved into this curious correlation using robust data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia. Employing statistical analyses, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from the years 2004 to 2021.

Our investigation revealed a statistically significant association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We speculate that there might be some "frankly" stimulating factors at play, possibly related to the chemicals and condiments that operate as unseen influencers on both fronts. Our findings confirm that this peculiar relationship is not mere "relish" but rather rooted in substantive statistical evidence, adding a dash of sizzle to the ongoing discourse in quirky career choices and competitive eating feats.

In conclusion, as we "relish" these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
While the correlation between the consumption of hotdogs and unusual occupation trends may initially appear as appealing as a plain hotdog with no condiments, our study uncovers a surprising connection that will have you relishing the findings. The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is not just a sausage of speculation, but a scientifically significant wiener-winner revelation. So, grab your mustard and ketchup, because we are about to unravel this spicy relationship.
On the surface, the concept might seem like a "hotdog" of an idea, but as more data sizzles onto the grill, we couldn't help but "relish" the opportunity to investigate this quirky correlation. It's not every day that one gets to explore the intersection of industrial occupations and competitive eating contests, but we are not ones to shy away from a good mystery - even if it's seasoned with some dad jokes.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics provided the meaty employment data, while Wikipedia served up the saucy hotdog-eating information. Through the use of statistical analyses, we managed to mustard up the numbers and resulted in uncovering a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value that's lower than the calories in a single hotdog. Now, that's a correlation hotter than a jalapeno-laden chili dog!
Our findings present a compelling case for a connection between the number of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the colossal consumption of hotdogs by the champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We cannot deny the strong association, suggesting that there might be more to this link than meets the mustard-covered eye. It's almost as if there are some unseen factors at play, perhaps lurking in the backstage of chemical plants and competitive eating stages.
This unexpected and "bun-believable" relationship invites further exploration into the world of industrial careers and competitive eating feats. As we embark on this culinary and occupational journey, we will not only unravel the mysteries of hotdogs and chemical operations but also add some much-needed humor and whimsy into the typically serious and straightforward world of academic research. So, hold onto your hats, and grab a hot dog, because this journey is about to get as spicy as a jalapeno-infused sausage!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The surprising connection between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the quantity of hotdogs consumed by the esteemed champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has stirred both curiosity and amusement within the academic community. This unexpected correlation has prompted numerous scholarly inquiries into the intersecting domains of industrial occupations and competitive eating, resulting in a blend of statistical analyses and culinary speculation.

In "Hotdogs and Occupational Quirks: A Statistical Analysis," Smith et al. provide the initial groundwork for our investigation by highlighting the statistical significance of the association between chemical plant operators in Oregon and the competitive hotdog consumption. The authors reveal a compelling correlation that has left scholars scratching their heads while reaching for the ketchup.

In "Franks and Factory Work: A Tale of Two Industries," Doe and Jones further expand upon the unexpected relationship, delving into the potential mechanisms that may underpin this curious correlation. Their exploration opens the door to a myriad of potential explanations, from shared marketing strategies between chemical plants and competitive eating events to the influence of industrial aromas on competitive eaters' appetites.

Turning to related non-fiction literature, "The Meaty Truth: Hotdogs and the Modern Workplace" by John T. Wurst and "Chemical Compounds and Competitive Consumption" by Jane Ketchup delve into the complex interplay between culinary indulgence and occupational trends, shedding light--or perhaps, mustard--on the obscure dynamics at play.

On the fictional front, "The Hotdog Conspiracy" by Sal A. Mann and "Sausage Secrets: Unraveling the Mysteries of Competitive Eating" by Patti O'Pan add a layer of whimsy to the scholarly discourse, posing comical yet thought-provoking scenarios that blur the line between reality and imagination.

In the realm of children's entertainment, the insightful research presented in the animated series "The Adventures of Frank the Hotdog and the Chemical Plant Operators" provides a lighthearted yet surprisingly relevant perspective on the entwined fates of hotdogs and chemical plant operations.

As we traverse this captivating landscape of literature, it becomes evident that the peculiar correlation between chemical plant operators in Oregon and the voracious hotdog consumption of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating champions is as "corny" as it is statistically significant. This unexpected link adds a refreshing flavor of humor and merriment to the typically serious pursuit of scientific inquiry, reminding us that even the most peculiar relationships can be as satisfying as a well-dressed hotdog at a summer barbecue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has long been a topic of speculation and jest in scientific circles. In this study, we delved into this curious correlation using robust data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia. Employing statistical analyses, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from the years 2004 to 2021.

Our investigation revealed a statistically significant association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We speculate that there might be some "frankly" stimulating factors at play, possibly related to the chemicals and condiments that operate as unseen influencers on both fronts. Our findings confirm that this peculiar relationship is not mere "relish" but rather rooted in substantive statistical evidence, adding a dash of sizzle to the ongoing discourse in quirky career choices and competitive eating feats.

In conclusion, as we "relish" these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
While the correlation between the consumption of hotdogs and unusual occupation trends may initially appear as appealing as a plain hotdog with no condiments, our study uncovers a surprising connection that will have you relishing the findings. The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is not just a sausage of speculation, but a scientifically significant wiener-winner revelation. So, grab your mustard and ketchup, because we are about to unravel this spicy relationship.
On the surface, the concept might seem like a "hotdog" of an idea, but as more data sizzles onto the grill, we couldn't help but "relish" the opportunity to investigate this quirky correlation. It's not every day that one gets to explore the intersection of industrial occupations and competitive eating contests, but we are not ones to shy away from a good mystery - even if it's seasoned with some dad jokes.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics provided the meaty employment data, while Wikipedia served up the saucy hotdog-eating information. Through the use of statistical analyses, we managed to mustard up the numbers and resulted in uncovering a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value that's lower than the calories in a single hotdog. Now, that's a correlation hotter than a jalapeno-laden chili dog!
Our findings present a compelling case for a connection between the number of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the colossal consumption of hotdogs by the champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We cannot deny the strong association, suggesting that there might be more to this link than meets the mustard-covered eye. It's almost as if there are some unseen factors at play, perhaps lurking in the backstage of chemical plants and competitive eating stages.
This unexpected and "bun-believable" relationship invites further exploration into the world of industrial careers and competitive eating feats. As we embark on this culinary and occupational journey, we will not only unravel the mysteries of hotdogs and chemical operations but also add some much-needed humor and whimsy into the typically serious and straightforward world of academic research. So, hold onto your hats, and grab a hot dog, because this journey is about to get as spicy as a jalapeno-infused sausage!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the tantalizing relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions, we concocted a research methodology as zesty as a barrel of mustard. Our approach incorporated a mix of statistical analyses, data mining, and a dash of unconventional humor to spice up our investigation.

First, we scoured the Bureau of Labor Statistics's treasure trove of employment data like intrepid culinary explorers seeking the juiciest hotdog toppings. We harvested information on the employment trends of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon from 2004 to 2021 – a period as rich in data as an all-you-can-eat hotdog buffet. We then whipped up a delectable statistical analysis to crunch these figures and uncover any hidden patterns, much like chefs meticulously perfecting their secret sauce recipes.

Next, we turned our attention to the sizzling world of competitive eating. Channeling our inner food historians, we ransacked the digital archives of Wikipedia, mining the intricacies of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition from the past 17 years. Like onion-chopping ninjas, we deftly dissected the consumption habits of the competition's champions, tracking their voracious hotdog intake with a precision that even the most seasoned wiener-eater might envy.

In a "bundling" of statistical wizardry and cheeky wordplay, we summoned the mystical powers of correlation analysis to scrutinize the relationship between these two seemingly disparate datasets. By wielding the statistical spatula of Pearson's correlation coefficient, we measured the strength and direction of the association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the awe-inspiring hotdog devouring prowess of the competition champions. But fear not, dear readers, for we seasoned this serious statistical pursuit with a handful of dad jokes to ensure the research process remained as entertaining as a lively hotdog stand banter.

In a final dash of whimsy, we created a conceptual model that encapsulated the interplay of factors influencing the curious connection between chemical plant operators and hotdog consumption, much like a culinary "recipe for success." This model, while undoubtedly infused with a generous helping of humor, served as an intellectual "bun" to anchor our findings and insights, providing a framework for future investigations to unravel the "meat" of this captivating correlation.

With our one-of-a-kind blend of labor statistics, competitive eating records, statistical seasoning, and a dollop of silliness, our research methodology stood as a testament to the quirky spirit of academic inquiry, proving that even the most unusual subjects can be analyzed with rigor and zest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7198956, r-squared of 0.5182497, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has long been a topic of speculation and jest in scientific circles. In this study, we delved into this curious correlation using robust data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia. Employing statistical analyses, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from the years 2004 to 2021.

Our investigation revealed a statistically significant association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We speculate that there might be some "frankly" stimulating factors at play, possibly related to the chemicals and condiments that operate as unseen influencers on both fronts. Our findings confirm that this peculiar relationship is not mere "relish" but rather rooted in substantive statistical evidence, adding a dash of sizzle to the ongoing discourse in quirky career choices and competitive eating feats.

In conclusion, as we "relish" these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
While the correlation between the consumption of hotdogs and unusual occupation trends may initially appear as appealing as a plain hotdog with no condiments, our study uncovers a surprising connection that will have you relishing the findings. The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is not just a sausage of speculation, but a scientifically significant wiener-winner revelation. So, grab your mustard and ketchup, because we are about to unravel this spicy relationship.
On the surface, the concept might seem like a "hotdog" of an idea, but as more data sizzles onto the grill, we couldn't help but "relish" the opportunity to investigate this quirky correlation. It's not every day that one gets to explore the intersection of industrial occupations and competitive eating contests, but we are not ones to shy away from a good mystery - even if it's seasoned with some dad jokes.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics provided the meaty employment data, while Wikipedia served up the saucy hotdog-eating information. Through the use of statistical analyses, we managed to mustard up the numbers and resulted in uncovering a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value that's lower than the calories in a single hotdog. Now, that's a correlation hotter than a jalapeno-laden chili dog!
Our findings present a compelling case for a connection between the number of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the colossal consumption of hotdogs by the champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We cannot deny the strong association, suggesting that there might be more to this link than meets the mustard-covered eye. It's almost as if there are some unseen factors at play, perhaps lurking in the backstage of chemical plants and competitive eating stages.
This unexpected and "bun-believable" relationship invites further exploration into the world of industrial careers and competitive eating feats. As we embark on this culinary and occupational journey, we will not only unravel the mysteries of hotdogs and chemical operations but also add some much-needed humor and whimsy into the typically serious and straightforward world of academic research. So, hold onto your hats, and grab a hot dog, because this journey is about to get as spicy as a jalapeno-infused sausage!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the connection between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition reveal a statistically significant correlation. From the years 2004 to 2021, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with an r-squared of 0.5182497, and a p-value of less than 0.01. It seems that this "wiener-takes-all" scenario is not as far-fetched as it might appear at first glance; there's some serious relish-worthy data to sink your teeth into.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the potent correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results depict a visualization of the "un-bun-lievable" connection between the number of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the renowned champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, further reinforcing the robust statistical support for this surprising relationship.

These findings bring to light the tantalizing possibility that the work of chemical plant operators could be more closely linked to the competitive eating world than previously thought. It's as if these careers and eating competitions have been "ketchup" in some inexplicable dance, each influencing the other in ways that were previously unbeknownst to us. It's time to "relish" in the discovery of this unexpected union and recognize the "frank-ly" intriguing insights it provides.

Our results support the notion that there could be a "sausage of causation" at play here, hinting at the potential for unseen industry influences on the champion eaters and their voracious hotdog consumption. This correlation is more than just a "bun-deal"; it's a savory connection that beckons further exploration and contemplation, garnished with a side of humor and scientific mirth.

The unexpected intertwining of these two seemingly unrelated realms will "relish" in further scrutiny and culinary investigation, "bunning" the gateway to new avenues of research that blend rigorous analysis with a sprinkle of whimsy and a pinch of paprika. The "wiener-takes-all" scenario may just be the beginning of a richer, more flavorful academic conversation that winks playfully at the unexpected connections woven into the fabric of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has long been a topic of speculation and jest in scientific circles. In this study, we delved into this curious correlation using robust data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia. Employing statistical analyses, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from the years 2004 to 2021.

Our investigation revealed a statistically significant association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We speculate that there might be some "frankly" stimulating factors at play, possibly related to the chemicals and condiments that operate as unseen influencers on both fronts. Our findings confirm that this peculiar relationship is not mere "relish" but rather rooted in substantive statistical evidence, adding a dash of sizzle to the ongoing discourse in quirky career choices and competitive eating feats.

In conclusion, as we "relish" these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The surprising connection between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the quantity of hotdogs consumed by the esteemed champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has stirred both curiosity and amusement within the academic community. This unexpected correlation has prompted numerous scholarly inquiries into the intersecting domains of industrial occupations and competitive eating, resulting in a blend of statistical analyses and culinary speculation.
In "Hotdogs and Occupational Quirks: A Statistical Analysis," Smith et al. provide the initial groundwork for our investigation by highlighting the statistical significance of the association between chemical plant operators in Oregon and the competitive hotdog consumption. The authors reveal a compelling correlation that has left scholars scratching their heads while reaching for the ketchup.
In "Franks and Factory Work: A Tale of Two Industries," Doe and Jones further expand upon the unexpected relationship, delving into the potential mechanisms that may underpin this curious correlation. Their exploration opens the door to a myriad of potential explanations, from shared marketing strategies between chemical plants and competitive eating events to the influence of industrial aromas on competitive eaters' appetites.
Turning to related non-fiction literature, "The Meaty Truth: Hotdogs and the Modern Workplace" by John T. Wurst and "Chemical Compounds and Competitive Consumption" by Jane Ketchup delve into the complex interplay between culinary indulgence and occupational trends, shedding lighton the obscure dynamics at play.
On the fictional front, "The Hotdog Conspiracy" by Sal A. Mann and "Sausage Secrets: Unraveling the Mysteries of Competitive Eating" by Patti O'Pan add a layer of whimsy to the scholarly discourse, posing comical yet thought-provoking scenarios that blur the line between reality and imagination.
In the realm of children's entertainment, the insightful research presented in the animated series "The Adventures of Frank the Hotdog and the Chemical Plant Operators" provides a lighthearted yet surprisingly relevant perspective on the entwined fates of hotdogs and chemical plant operations.
As we traverse this captivating landscape of literature, it becomes evident that the peculiar correlation between chemical plant operators in Oregon and the voracious hotdog consumption of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating champions is as "corny" as it is statistically significant. This unexpected link adds a refreshing flavor of humor and merriment to the typically serious pursuit of scientific inquiry, reminding us that even the most peculiar relationships can be as satisfying as a well-dressed hotdog at a summer barbecue.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition reveal a statistically significant correlation. From the years 2004 to 2021, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with an r-squared of 0.5182497, and a p-value of less than 0.01. It seems that this "wiener-takes-all" scenario is not as far-fetched as it might appear at first glance; there's some serious relish-worthy data to sink your teeth into.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the potent correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results depict a visualization of the "un-bun-lievable" connection between the number of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the renowned champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, further reinforcing the robust statistical support for this surprising relationship.
These findings bring to light the tantalizing possibility that the work of chemical plant operators could be more closely linked to the competitive eating world than previously thought. It's as if these careers and eating competitions have been "ketchup" in some inexplicable dance, each influencing the other in ways that were previously unbeknownst to us. It's time to "relish" in the discovery of this unexpected union and recognize the "frank-ly" intriguing insights it provides.
Our results support the notion that there could be a "sausage of causation" at play here, hinting at the potential for unseen industry influences on the champion eaters and their voracious hotdog consumption. This correlation is more than just a "bun-deal"; it's a savory connection that beckons further exploration and contemplation, garnished with a side of humor and scientific mirth.
The unexpected intertwining of these two seemingly unrelated realms will "relish" in further scrutiny and culinary investigation, "bunning" the gateway to new avenues of research that blend rigorous analysis with a sprinkle of whimsy and a pinch of paprika. The "wiener-takes-all" scenario may just be the beginning of a richer, more flavorful academic conversation that winks playfully at the unexpected connections woven into the fabric of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the astonishing correlation between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the remarkable champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has revealed insightful findings that have left us contemplating the "buns and minuses" of this unexpected relationship.

Our research not only confirms, but also builds upon the previous work of Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, highlighting their "relish-able" insights into the intertwining realms of industrial occupations and competitive eating. Our results extensively support their initial groundwork, giving further credence to the statistically significant association unveiled in their studies. It's as if, much like a well-timed joke, this correlation between hotdog consumption and chemical plant operators in Oregon has a hidden depth to it – a "wiener-mension," if you will.

Furthermore, our findings echo the comically titled works of John T. Wurst and Jane Ketchup, adding a touch of mustard to their robust analyses. The statistical evidence from our study offers a "bun-derful" validation of their exploration into the complex interplay between culinary indulgence and occupational trends, driving home the point that this peculiar relationship has substantial meat to it, despite its seemingly lighthearted facade.

Our scatterplot demonstrates the potent correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, in a manner that is as visually striking as a perfectly grilled hotdog. It's as if the data is saying, "ketchup with us, we have buns of fun!" The robust statistical support for this surprising relationship has taken us on a journey through the unexpected, shedding light on the obscure "wiener-gies" at play, and "frank-ly," we can't help but relish in every moment.

In tantalizing fashion, our study hints at the potential for unseen industry influences on the champion eaters and their voracious hotdog consumption. It's all "sausage of causation," implying that there's more to this connection than meets the eye – a pickled onion that will surely be explored in future studies, reminding us that even the most bizarre correlations can be as satisfying as a well-dressed hotdog at a summer barbecue.

In conclusion, while we "relish" in these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard. We encourage future studies to follow the "sausage" of statistical exploration, "bunning" the gateway to new avenues of research that flavor the academic dialogue with a sprinkle of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has long been a topic of speculation and jest in scientific circles. In this study, we delved into this curious correlation using robust data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia. Employing statistical analyses, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from the years 2004 to 2021.

Our investigation revealed a statistically significant association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We speculate that there might be some "frankly" stimulating factors at play, possibly related to the chemicals and condiments that operate as unseen influencers on both fronts. Our findings confirm that this peculiar relationship is not mere "relish" but rather rooted in substantive statistical evidence, adding a dash of sizzle to the ongoing discourse in quirky career choices and competitive eating feats.

In conclusion, as we "relish" these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
While the correlation between the consumption of hotdogs and unusual occupation trends may initially appear as appealing as a plain hotdog with no condiments, our study uncovers a surprising connection that will have you relishing the findings. The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is not just a sausage of speculation, but a scientifically significant wiener-winner revelation. So, grab your mustard and ketchup, because we are about to unravel this spicy relationship.
On the surface, the concept might seem like a "hotdog" of an idea, but as more data sizzles onto the grill, we couldn't help but "relish" the opportunity to investigate this quirky correlation. It's not every day that one gets to explore the intersection of industrial occupations and competitive eating contests, but we are not ones to shy away from a good mystery - even if it's seasoned with some dad jokes.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics provided the meaty employment data, while Wikipedia served up the saucy hotdog-eating information. Through the use of statistical analyses, we managed to mustard up the numbers and resulted in uncovering a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value that's lower than the calories in a single hotdog. Now, that's a correlation hotter than a jalapeno-laden chili dog!
Our findings present a compelling case for a connection between the number of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the colossal consumption of hotdogs by the champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We cannot deny the strong association, suggesting that there might be more to this link than meets the mustard-covered eye. It's almost as if there are some unseen factors at play, perhaps lurking in the backstage of chemical plants and competitive eating stages.
This unexpected and "bun-believable" relationship invites further exploration into the world of industrial careers and competitive eating feats. As we embark on this culinary and occupational journey, we will not only unravel the mysteries of hotdogs and chemical operations but also add some much-needed humor and whimsy into the typically serious and straightforward world of academic research. So, hold onto your hats, and grab a hot dog, because this journey is about to get as spicy as a jalapeno-infused sausage!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition reveal a statistically significant correlation. From the years 2004 to 2021, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with an r-squared of 0.5182497, and a p-value of less than 0.01. It seems that this "wiener-takes-all" scenario is not as far-fetched as it might appear at first glance; there's some serious relish-worthy data to sink your teeth into.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the potent correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results depict a visualization of the "un-bun-lievable" connection between the number of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the renowned champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, further reinforcing the robust statistical support for this surprising relationship.
These findings bring to light the tantalizing possibility that the work of chemical plant operators could be more closely linked to the competitive eating world than previously thought. It's as if these careers and eating competitions have been "ketchup" in some inexplicable dance, each influencing the other in ways that were previously unbeknownst to us. It's time to "relish" in the discovery of this unexpected union and recognize the "frank-ly" intriguing insights it provides.
Our results support the notion that there could be a "sausage of causation" at play here, hinting at the potential for unseen industry influences on the champion eaters and their voracious hotdog consumption. This correlation is more than just a "bun-deal"; it's a savory connection that beckons further exploration and contemplation, garnished with a side of humor and scientific mirth.
The unexpected intertwining of these two seemingly unrelated realms will "relish" in further scrutiny and culinary investigation, "bunning" the gateway to new avenues of research that blend rigorous analysis with a sprinkle of whimsy and a pinch of paprika. The "wiener-takes-all" scenario may just be the beginning of a richer, more flavorful academic conversation that winks playfully at the unexpected connections woven into the fabric of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has grilled up some truly "bun-believable" revelations regarding the connection between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It's clear that there's more to this correlation than meets the "mustard"! This unexpected link has added a deliciously quirky twist to the world of competitive eating and industrial occupations.

As we wrap up this study, we must acknowledge that the statistical significance we've uncovered is more than just a flash in the pan - it's a "frankly" surprising finding that deserves to be relished. Just like a well-dressed hotdog, our results are both saucy and satisfying, leaving no room for "relish"ing the potential implications.

But before we "ketchup" on any further investigations, it's essential to recognize that this study's findings are, in fact, the "wiener-takes-all" moment. We have served up this piping hot dish of data and humor, leaving little room for future research to "meat" the standards we've set. It's time to pull out the "bun-der" and call it a day in the realm of hotdog and occupational correlation studies. After all, how much more mustard can one condiment onto this peculiar pairing of occupations and competitive eating without the risk of being too saucy?

Therefore, it's with a heavy heart and a lightened appetite that we declare: no more research is needed regarding the connection between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions. Let's wrap it all up like a perfect hotdog and savor the findings we've uncovered, while also perhaps savoring a well-deserved hotdog ourselves! As we bid adieu to this tantalizing topic, we can only hope that our study has brought some laughter and lightness to the academic world amidst this unexpected connection between industrial occupations and competitive eating feats. Cheers to the "wiener" on this "bun-derful" journey!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Gastronomical Chemistry and Industrial Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Experimental Gastronomic Anthropology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Wiener-takes-all: Unveiling the Surprising Link Between Chemical Plant Operators in Oregon and Hotdog Consumption Among Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions with an abstract of The relationship between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has long been a topic of speculation and jest in scientific circles. In this study, we delved into this curious correlation using robust data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia. Employing statistical analyses, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7198956, with a p-value of less than 0.01, from the years 2004 to 2021.
Our investigation revealed a statistically significant association between the employment of chemical plant operators in Oregon and the hotdog consumption habits of the iconic champions of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We speculate that there might be some "frankly" stimulating factors at play, possibly related to the chemicals and condiments that operate as unseen influencers on both fronts. Our findings confirm that this peculiar relationship is not mere "relish" but rather rooted in substantive statistical evidence, adding a dash of sizzle to the ongoing discourse in quirky career choices and competitive eating feats.
In conclusion, as we "relish" these findings, it is evident that there is a "bun-believable" link between the number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon and the astonishing quantities of hotdogs voraciously devoured by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unexpected connection prompts further investigation into the unseen forces at play and invites researchers to delve deeper into the world of culinary competitions and industrial career trends with a side of humor and a dash of mustard.

ChatGPT:

chemical plant operators, Oregon, hotdog consumption, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wikipedia, condiments, competitive eating, culinary competitions, industrial career trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.7198956 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5182497 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 51.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00076. 0.0007552896796300474000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.72 in 0.076% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,324 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.38, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon (Laborers)805060300310170140140200210150160210170350280210320
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)53.334953.75665968546268696162707274717576




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([80,50,60,300,310,170,140,140,200,210,150,160,210,170,350,280,210,320,])
array_2 = np.array([53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,])
array_1_name = "The number of chemical plant and system operators in Oregon"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1480 · Black Variable ID: 17327 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0