Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the name August gained popularity, more parents were inspired by the month to go for a 'hyundai' birth, leading to a baby boom. With more Hyundais on the road, the demand for automotive parts soared, putting pressure on Hyundai Motor America to issue more recalls. It seems like the name August was revving up more than just affection!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a black-and-white newspaper illustration depicting a bustling town street. In the center, there is a sleek Hyundai car named "August" with its license plate in full view, drawing a crowd of admirers. In the background, a group of Hyundai engineers are depicted working diligently, highlighting their efforts to address and fix recalls to ensure the safety of the vehicles. The scene should capture the attention of the viewers through the contrast between the admiration for the car and the focused troubleshooting in the background. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Futuristic Concept art Symbolism A black-and-white newspaper illustration
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town, a sleek Hyundai car with the name "August" emblazoned on its license plate draws a crowd of admirers. But in the background, a group of Hyundai engineers work diligently to address and fix a few recalls, ensuring the safety of the vehicles.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town, a sleek Hyundai car with the name "August" emblazoned on its license plate draws a crowd of admirers. But in the background, a group of Hyundai engineers work diligently to address and fix a few recalls, ensuring the safety of the vehicles. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a black-and-white newspaper illustration depicting a bustling town street. In the center, there is a sleek Hyundai car named "August" with its license plate in full view, drawing a crowd of admirers. In the background, a group of Hyundai engineers are depicted working diligently, highlighting their efforts to address and fix recalls to ensure the safety of the vehicles. The scene should capture the attention of the viewers through the contrast between the admiration for the car and the focused troubleshooting in the background.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name August caused Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America The Journal of Quirky Research and Uncommon Findings Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and p < 0.01 for 1986 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety, shedding light on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Through rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we have uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1986 to 2022. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and automotive recalls, but also spark intriguing questions about the potential impact of nomenclature on product quality. This study invites a lighthearted exploration of the quirky and unexpected connections that may influence consumer behavior and industry trends. Consequently, it adds a delightful twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on automotive safety, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety, shedding light on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Through rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we have uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1986 to 2022. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and automotive recalls, but also spark intriguing questions about the potential impact of nomenclature on product quality. This study invites a lighthearted exploration of the quirky and unexpected connections that may influence consumer behavior and industry trends. Consequently, it adds a delightful twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on automotive safety, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of automotive safety is a serious and pressing matter. With vehicles serving as essential modes of transportation for countless individuals and families, the integrity and reliability of automobiles are of paramount importance. Amidst the ever-evolving landscape of automotive engineering and manufacturing, it is imperative to examine potential factors that may influence the quality and safety of vehicles.
In this study, we venture into uncharted territory, examining the undeniable allure of nomenclature and its intriguing relationship with automotive safety. Our focus is on the first name "August" and its connection to automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. While the connection may appear to be nothing more than a curious coincidence at first glance, our investigation sheds light on compelling correlations that prompt deeper contemplation.
The art and science of naming occupy a peculiar, albeit enchanting, realm within the human experience. Names bear profound significance and are often imbued with cultural, linguistic, and historical connotations. Moreover, names can evoke vivid imagery and associations, shaping our perceptions and biases in subtle ways. With this in mind, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we delve into the depths of our research, we aim to inject a touch of whimsy into the traditionally sober discourse on automotive safety. The unexpected juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated elements – the popularity of a given name and automotive recalls – beckons us to ponder the idiosyncrasies that permeate our world. Through a blend of rigorous statistical analysis and lighthearted musings, we endeavor to captivate the imagination while upholding the standards of academic inquiry.
By examining the chronicles of automotive recalls alongside the ebbs and flows in the prevalence of the name "August," we seek to unravel an intriguing tapestry of correlation. Yet, in doing so, we also invite a playful excursion into the realm of unexpected connections and serendipitous findings. In this pursuit, we encourage the readers to embrace the charm and whimsy that accompany our exploration of the intersection between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we embark on this unusual odyssey, let us approach our study with a keen eye for the unexpected and the uncanny. For in the realm of academic inquiry, as in life itself, there is often more than meets the eye, particularly when it comes to the confluence of names and automotive recalls. Join us as we embark on a journey imbued with intellectual rigor, yet sprinkled with a dash of delightful peculiarity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety, shedding light on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Through rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we have uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1986 to 2022. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and automotive recalls, but also spark intriguing questions about the potential impact of nomenclature on product quality. This study invites a lighthearted exploration of the quirky and unexpected connections that may influence consumer behavior and industry trends. Consequently, it adds a delightful twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on automotive safety, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of automotive safety is a serious and pressing matter. With vehicles serving as essential modes of transportation for countless individuals and families, the integrity and reliability of automobiles are of paramount importance. Amidst the ever-evolving landscape of automotive engineering and manufacturing, it is imperative to examine potential factors that may influence the quality and safety of vehicles.
In this study, we venture into uncharted territory, examining the undeniable allure of nomenclature and its intriguing relationship with automotive safety. Our focus is on the first name "August" and its connection to automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. While the connection may appear to be nothing more than a curious coincidence at first glance, our investigation sheds light on compelling correlations that prompt deeper contemplation.
The art and science of naming occupy a peculiar, albeit enchanting, realm within the human experience. Names bear profound significance and are often imbued with cultural, linguistic, and historical connotations. Moreover, names can evoke vivid imagery and associations, shaping our perceptions and biases in subtle ways. With this in mind, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we delve into the depths of our research, we aim to inject a touch of whimsy into the traditionally sober discourse on automotive safety. The unexpected juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated elements – the popularity of a given name and automotive recalls – beckons us to ponder the idiosyncrasies that permeate our world. Through a blend of rigorous statistical analysis and lighthearted musings, we endeavor to captivate the imagination while upholding the standards of academic inquiry.
By examining the chronicles of automotive recalls alongside the ebbs and flows in the prevalence of the name "August," we seek to unravel an intriguing tapestry of correlation. Yet, in doing so, we also invite a playful excursion into the realm of unexpected connections and serendipitous findings. In this pursuit, we encourage the readers to embrace the charm and whimsy that accompany our exploration of the intersection between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we embark on this unusual odyssey, let us approach our study with a keen eye for the unexpected and the uncanny. For in the realm of academic inquiry, as in life itself, there is often more than meets the eye, particularly when it comes to the confluence of names and automotive recalls. Join us as we embark on a journey imbued with intellectual rigor, yet sprinkled with a dash of delightful peculiarity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between nomenclature and automotive recalls has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. Smith et al. (2017) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the potential impact of personal names on product quality, with a focus on automotive safety. Their findings revealed intriguing patterns suggestive of an association between the phonetic composition of names and the occurrence of recalls in the automotive sector. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2019) explored the cultural and psychological dimensions of personal names and their potential influence on consumer behavior, unveiling subtle yet significant associations with product perceptions.
Moving beyond the traditional boundaries of nomenclature studies, our investigation ventures into the realm of unexpected connections and whimsical insights. The work of Rowling (2005) in "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" prompts contemplation on the magical implications of nomenclature, underscoring the fantastical elements that may influence the perception of product quality and safety. In a similar vein, the explorations of Tolkien (1937) in "The Hobbit" offer allegorical insights into the intricacies of name symbolism, stimulating imaginative reflections on the potential impact of nomenclature in the automotive domain.
Furthermore, anecdotal evidence from social media posts has contributed to the narrative surrounding the interplay of names and automotive recalls. A tweet by @AutoEnthusiast87 remarked on the uncanny correlation between the proliferation of the name "August" and the frequency of recalls by Hyundai Motor America, sparking a wave of humorous speculations and pun-laden observations within the online automotive community. Additionally, a Reddit thread titled "The Great August Recall Mystery" elicited a cascade of tongue-in-cheek musings and speculative banter, further showcasing the peculiar allure of our research topic.
While the scholarly literature has laid a foundation for the examination of nomenclature and product quality, our study represents a departure from the conventional, infusing a spirit of whimsy and intrigue into the exploration of unexpected correlations. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite the reader to join us in embracing the delightful eccentricities that permeate the intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1986 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety, shedding light on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Through rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we have uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1986 to 2022. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and automotive recalls, but also spark intriguing questions about the potential impact of nomenclature on product quality. This study invites a lighthearted exploration of the quirky and unexpected connections that may influence consumer behavior and industry trends. Consequently, it adds a delightful twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on automotive safety, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of automotive safety is a serious and pressing matter. With vehicles serving as essential modes of transportation for countless individuals and families, the integrity and reliability of automobiles are of paramount importance. Amidst the ever-evolving landscape of automotive engineering and manufacturing, it is imperative to examine potential factors that may influence the quality and safety of vehicles.
In this study, we venture into uncharted territory, examining the undeniable allure of nomenclature and its intriguing relationship with automotive safety. Our focus is on the first name "August" and its connection to automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. While the connection may appear to be nothing more than a curious coincidence at first glance, our investigation sheds light on compelling correlations that prompt deeper contemplation.
The art and science of naming occupy a peculiar, albeit enchanting, realm within the human experience. Names bear profound significance and are often imbued with cultural, linguistic, and historical connotations. Moreover, names can evoke vivid imagery and associations, shaping our perceptions and biases in subtle ways. With this in mind, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we delve into the depths of our research, we aim to inject a touch of whimsy into the traditionally sober discourse on automotive safety. The unexpected juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated elements – the popularity of a given name and automotive recalls – beckons us to ponder the idiosyncrasies that permeate our world. Through a blend of rigorous statistical analysis and lighthearted musings, we endeavor to captivate the imagination while upholding the standards of academic inquiry.
By examining the chronicles of automotive recalls alongside the ebbs and flows in the prevalence of the name "August," we seek to unravel an intriguing tapestry of correlation. Yet, in doing so, we also invite a playful excursion into the realm of unexpected connections and serendipitous findings. In this pursuit, we encourage the readers to embrace the charm and whimsy that accompany our exploration of the intersection between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we embark on this unusual odyssey, let us approach our study with a keen eye for the unexpected and the uncanny. For in the realm of academic inquiry, as in life itself, there is often more than meets the eye, particularly when it comes to the confluence of names and automotive recalls. Join us as we embark on a journey imbued with intellectual rigor, yet sprinkled with a dash of delightful peculiarity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Sample Selection:
For this peculiar inquiry, the sample size encompassed all individuals bearing the august appellation, culled from the rich troves of data maintained by the US Social Security Administration. Equally vital to our pursuit was the extraction of automotive recall information from the exhaustive repositories of the US Department of Transportation. The data spanned the illustrious years from 1986 to 2022, capturing the ebbs and flows of both name popularity and automotive recalls. Our selection criteria remained steadfast, excluding no augustly named individual and no Hyundai Motor America recall from our scrutiny.
Data Analysis:
To assess the relationship between the name "August" and Hyundai Motor America automotive recalls, we ventured into the labyrinthine realms of statistical analysis. Utilizing rigorous techniques such as Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression models, we sought to scrutinize the data for any semblance of an inexplicably robust connection. Our endeavor was not without peril, as navigating the intricate network of nomenclature and recalls proved to be a thoroughly quixotic quest. Nevertheless, armed with an arsenal of equations and computations, we sought to unravel the enigmatic interplay between these seemingly unrelated domains.
Control Variables:
In our perpetual pursuit of scholarly rigor, we conscientiously accounted for an array of confounding variables that could potentially obfuscate our findings. Factors such as time trends, demographic shifts, and the whims of automotive fate were meticulously nested within our models, ensuring that our investigation remained anchored in steadfast scientific moorings.
Ethical Considerations:
While our expedition into the whimsical world of nomenclature and automotive safety may have appeared seemingly lighthearted, we remained resolute in upholding the sacred tenets of ethical research conduct. Every ounce of august-named individual and every recall was accorded the dignity and respect befitting their status within the annals of data, lest we incur the wrath of statistical deities and incur the fateful curse of p-values gone awry.
Limitations:
Alas, no academic odyssey is bereft of obstacles, and ours was no exception. We acknowledge the limitations inherent in our study, acutely aware that despite our best efforts and mercurial wit, causal inferences may elude our grasp. The complex interplay of human nomenclature and automotive manufacturing may prove capriciously elusive, leaving our findings suspended in the delightful but enigmatic realm of correlation without causation.
In conclusion, our methods, while infused with a delightful hint of whimsy, were meticulously designed to rigorously examine the nexus of name prevalence and automotive recalls. With a mix of statistical fortitude and wry observance, we endeavored to shed light on this paradoxical dance between nomenclature and automotive safety, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to partake in our scholarly sojourn through the whimsical landscape of August and automotive recalls.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and US DOT .
For the time period 1986 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9053210, r-squared of 0.8196060, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety, shedding light on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Through rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we have uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1986 to 2022. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and automotive recalls, but also spark intriguing questions about the potential impact of nomenclature on product quality. This study invites a lighthearted exploration of the quirky and unexpected connections that may influence consumer behavior and industry trends. Consequently, it adds a delightful twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on automotive safety, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of automotive safety is a serious and pressing matter. With vehicles serving as essential modes of transportation for countless individuals and families, the integrity and reliability of automobiles are of paramount importance. Amidst the ever-evolving landscape of automotive engineering and manufacturing, it is imperative to examine potential factors that may influence the quality and safety of vehicles.
In this study, we venture into uncharted territory, examining the undeniable allure of nomenclature and its intriguing relationship with automotive safety. Our focus is on the first name "August" and its connection to automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. While the connection may appear to be nothing more than a curious coincidence at first glance, our investigation sheds light on compelling correlations that prompt deeper contemplation.
The art and science of naming occupy a peculiar, albeit enchanting, realm within the human experience. Names bear profound significance and are often imbued with cultural, linguistic, and historical connotations. Moreover, names can evoke vivid imagery and associations, shaping our perceptions and biases in subtle ways. With this in mind, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we delve into the depths of our research, we aim to inject a touch of whimsy into the traditionally sober discourse on automotive safety. The unexpected juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated elements – the popularity of a given name and automotive recalls – beckons us to ponder the idiosyncrasies that permeate our world. Through a blend of rigorous statistical analysis and lighthearted musings, we endeavor to captivate the imagination while upholding the standards of academic inquiry.
By examining the chronicles of automotive recalls alongside the ebbs and flows in the prevalence of the name "August," we seek to unravel an intriguing tapestry of correlation. Yet, in doing so, we also invite a playful excursion into the realm of unexpected connections and serendipitous findings. In this pursuit, we encourage the readers to embrace the charm and whimsy that accompany our exploration of the intersection between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we embark on this unusual odyssey, let us approach our study with a keen eye for the unexpected and the uncanny. For in the realm of academic inquiry, as in life itself, there is often more than meets the eye, particularly when it comes to the confluence of names and automotive recalls. Join us as we embark on a journey imbued with intellectual rigor, yet sprinkled with a dash of delightful peculiarity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the gathered data, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. The correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and an r-squared value of 0.8196060 reveal a robust and noteworthy relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The level of statistical significance, as indicated by p < 0.01, further underscores the strength of this correlation.
The findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that displays the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "August" and the occurrence of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. This graphical representation paints a compelling picture of the intriguing association uncovered by our analysis.
The observed correlation prompts contemplation regarding the potential influence of nomenclature on consumer products. It provokes thought-provoking musings on the enigmatic forces that may impact the quality and safety of goods, adding an element of whimsy to the otherwise earnest discourse on product reliability.
While our study unravels the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name "August" and automotive recalls, it also beckons to the serendipitous and unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of daily phenomena. It invites us to not only ponder the statistical significance of these findings but also to revel in the delightful mysteries that pervade our world.
The remarkable correlation observed in our study fuels curiosity and invites further exploration of the intriguing ties between nomenclature and product safety. This study not only contributes to the scholarly discourse on consumer behavior and industry trends but also injects a dose of joviality into the scholarly pursuit of understanding the influences that shape our everyday experiences.
In conclusion, the correlation between the first name "August" and automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America offers a refreshing perspective to the study of product quality and nomenclature. It presents an engaging blend of statistical rigor and whimsical intrigue, reminding us that the world of academic inquiry holds space for both scholarly gravity and playful curiosity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety, shedding light on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Through rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we have uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1986 to 2022. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and automotive recalls, but also spark intriguing questions about the potential impact of nomenclature on product quality. This study invites a lighthearted exploration of the quirky and unexpected connections that may influence consumer behavior and industry trends. Consequently, it adds a delightful twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on automotive safety, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between nomenclature and automotive recalls has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. Smith et al. (2017) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the potential impact of personal names on product quality, with a focus on automotive safety. Their findings revealed intriguing patterns suggestive of an association between the phonetic composition of names and the occurrence of recalls in the automotive sector. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2019) explored the cultural and psychological dimensions of personal names and their potential influence on consumer behavior, unveiling subtle yet significant associations with product perceptions.
Moving beyond the traditional boundaries of nomenclature studies, our investigation ventures into the realm of unexpected connections and whimsical insights. The work of Rowling (2005) in "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" prompts contemplation on the magical implications of nomenclature, underscoring the fantastical elements that may influence the perception of product quality and safety. In a similar vein, the explorations of Tolkien (1937) in "The Hobbit" offer allegorical insights into the intricacies of name symbolism, stimulating imaginative reflections on the potential impact of nomenclature in the automotive domain.
Furthermore, anecdotal evidence from social media posts has contributed to the narrative surrounding the interplay of names and automotive recalls. A tweet by @AutoEnthusiast87 remarked on the uncanny correlation between the proliferation of the name "August" and the frequency of recalls by Hyundai Motor America, sparking a wave of humorous speculations and pun-laden observations within the online automotive community. Additionally, a Reddit thread titled "The Great August Recall Mystery" elicited a cascade of tongue-in-cheek musings and speculative banter, further showcasing the peculiar allure of our research topic.
While the scholarly literature has laid a foundation for the examination of nomenclature and product quality, our study represents a departure from the conventional, infusing a spirit of whimsy and intrigue into the exploration of unexpected correlations. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we invite the reader to join us in embracing the delightful eccentricities that permeate the intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the gathered data, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. The correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and an r-squared value of 0.8196060 reveal a robust and noteworthy relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The level of statistical significance, as indicated by p < 0.01, further underscores the strength of this correlation.
The findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that displays the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "August" and the occurrence of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. This graphical representation paints a compelling picture of the intriguing association uncovered by our analysis.
The observed correlation prompts contemplation regarding the potential influence of nomenclature on consumer products. It provokes thought-provoking musings on the enigmatic forces that may impact the quality and safety of goods, adding an element of whimsy to the otherwise earnest discourse on product reliability.
While our study unravels the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name "August" and automotive recalls, it also beckons to the serendipitous and unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of daily phenomena. It invites us to not only ponder the statistical significance of these findings but also to revel in the delightful mysteries that pervade our world.
The remarkable correlation observed in our study fuels curiosity and invites further exploration of the intriguing ties between nomenclature and product safety. This study not only contributes to the scholarly discourse on consumer behavior and industry trends but also injects a dose of joviality into the scholarly pursuit of understanding the influences that shape our everyday experiences.
In conclusion, the correlation between the first name "August" and automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America offers a refreshing perspective to the study of product quality and nomenclature. It presents an engaging blend of statistical rigor and whimsical intrigue, reminding us that the world of academic inquiry holds space for both scholarly gravity and playful curiosity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our study reveal a compelling correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. This unexpected connection adds a delightful twist to the discourse on automotive safety and prompts us to consider the potential influence of nomenclature on product quality.
Building on the scholarly literature, which has increasingly delved into the peculiar associations between names and product perceptions, our research takes a whimsical turn to investigate the whimsical correlations that may underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena. Though initially reminiscent of magical musings in works of fiction, such as those by Rowling and Tolkien, our study showcases the real-world application of exploring the unexpected ties between nomenclature and automotive safety. By taking seemingly unrelated variables and uncovering a remarkable correlation, our findings provide robust support for the whimsical hypotheses that have permeated fictional narratives and social media speculations.
The significant correlation coefficient and the visually compelling scatterplot in Figure 1 illustrate the strength of the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and the occurrence of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America, supporting the intriguing interplay of nomenclature and industry trends. The statistical significance of our findings underlines the robustness of this association, inviting further explorations into the enigmatic forces that may influence product quality.
By injecting a dose of joviality into the scholarly pursuit of understanding consumer behavior and industry trends, our study not only contributes to the scholarly discourse but also invites a lighthearted exploration of the intriguing connections that shape our everyday experiences. It reminds us that the unexpected may hold valuable insights, and that academic inquiry can accommodate both rigorous analysis and playful curiosity.
In unraveling the compelling relationship between the first name "August" and automotive recalls, our research brings a whimsical perspective to the study of nomenclature and product quality. As we embrace the intriguing eccentricities that permeate the intersection of whimsy and academia, our study stands as a testament to the multifaceted nature of scholarly inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name August and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety, shedding light on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Through rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we have uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1986 to 2022. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and automotive recalls, but also spark intriguing questions about the potential impact of nomenclature on product quality. This study invites a lighthearted exploration of the quirky and unexpected connections that may influence consumer behavior and industry trends. Consequently, it adds a delightful twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on automotive safety, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of automotive safety is a serious and pressing matter. With vehicles serving as essential modes of transportation for countless individuals and families, the integrity and reliability of automobiles are of paramount importance. Amidst the ever-evolving landscape of automotive engineering and manufacturing, it is imperative to examine potential factors that may influence the quality and safety of vehicles.
In this study, we venture into uncharted territory, examining the undeniable allure of nomenclature and its intriguing relationship with automotive safety. Our focus is on the first name "August" and its connection to automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. While the connection may appear to be nothing more than a curious coincidence at first glance, our investigation sheds light on compelling correlations that prompt deeper contemplation.
The art and science of naming occupy a peculiar, albeit enchanting, realm within the human experience. Names bear profound significance and are often imbued with cultural, linguistic, and historical connotations. Moreover, names can evoke vivid imagery and associations, shaping our perceptions and biases in subtle ways. With this in mind, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we delve into the depths of our research, we aim to inject a touch of whimsy into the traditionally sober discourse on automotive safety. The unexpected juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated elements – the popularity of a given name and automotive recalls – beckons us to ponder the idiosyncrasies that permeate our world. Through a blend of rigorous statistical analysis and lighthearted musings, we endeavor to captivate the imagination while upholding the standards of academic inquiry.
By examining the chronicles of automotive recalls alongside the ebbs and flows in the prevalence of the name "August," we seek to unravel an intriguing tapestry of correlation. Yet, in doing so, we also invite a playful excursion into the realm of unexpected connections and serendipitous findings. In this pursuit, we encourage the readers to embrace the charm and whimsy that accompany our exploration of the intersection between nomenclature and automotive safety.
As we embark on this unusual odyssey, let us approach our study with a keen eye for the unexpected and the uncanny. For in the realm of academic inquiry, as in life itself, there is often more than meets the eye, particularly when it comes to the confluence of names and automotive recalls. Join us as we embark on a journey imbued with intellectual rigor, yet sprinkled with a dash of delightful peculiarity.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the gathered data, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. The correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and an r-squared value of 0.8196060 reveal a robust and noteworthy relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The level of statistical significance, as indicated by p < 0.01, further underscores the strength of this correlation.
The findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that displays the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "August" and the occurrence of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. This graphical representation paints a compelling picture of the intriguing association uncovered by our analysis.
The observed correlation prompts contemplation regarding the potential influence of nomenclature on consumer products. It provokes thought-provoking musings on the enigmatic forces that may impact the quality and safety of goods, adding an element of whimsy to the otherwise earnest discourse on product reliability.
While our study unravels the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name "August" and automotive recalls, it also beckons to the serendipitous and unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of daily phenomena. It invites us to not only ponder the statistical significance of these findings but also to revel in the delightful mysteries that pervade our world.
The remarkable correlation observed in our study fuels curiosity and invites further exploration of the intriguing ties between nomenclature and product safety. This study not only contributes to the scholarly discourse on consumer behavior and industry trends but also injects a dose of joviality into the scholarly pursuit of understanding the influences that shape our everyday experiences.
In conclusion, the correlation between the first name "August" and automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America offers a refreshing perspective to the study of product quality and nomenclature. It presents an engaging blend of statistical rigor and whimsical intrigue, reminding us that the world of academic inquiry holds space for both scholarly gravity and playful curiosity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In this study, we have unraveled an unforeseen correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America, shedding light on the enchanting yet confounding ties between nomenclature and automotive safety. Our stringent analysis has unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 (p < 0.01), demonstrating a compelling relationship that calls for further contemplation.
The whimsical implications of our findings invite us to consider the idiosyncratic forces that may lurk beneath the veneer of routine occurrences. Indeed, the allure of nomenclature extends beyond its linguistic and cultural dimensions, intertwining with the fabric of consumer behavior and product quality in unexpectedly delightful ways. This study offers a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls, infusing a touch of mirth into the solemn discourse on automotive safety.
While the correlation we have uncovered may seem like an amusing coincidence, it beckons us to ponder the playfulness of fate and the capricious nature of correlations. The study not only contributes to the existing body of knowledge but also adds a charming twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on consumer products and their nomenclature.
In light of these revelations, we assert that no further research in this area is needed. The correlation between the first name "August" and automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America has been duly established, offering a delightfully quirky terrain for scholarly exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Quirky Research and Uncommon Findings
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Automotive Naming and Safety Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America with an abstract of This paper delves into the fascinating intersection of nomenclature and automotive safety, shedding light on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "August" and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Through rigorous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we have uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053210 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1986 to 2022. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for the relationship between the prevalence of the name "August" and automotive recalls, but also spark intriguing questions about the potential impact of nomenclature on product quality. This study invites a lighthearted exploration of the quirky and unexpected connections that may influence consumer behavior and industry trends. Consequently, it adds a delightful twist to the oftentimes sober discourse on automotive safety, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the world of vehicular recalls.
ChatGPT:
"August name popularity," "automotive safety correlation," "Hyundai Motor America recalls," "US Social Security Administration data," "US Department of Transportation analysis," "nomenclature impact on product quality," "consumer behavior trends," "vehicle recalls correlation," "whimsical lens on automotive safety"
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name AugustDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named August
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name August
Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Hyundai Motor America
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8196060 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name August) over the 37 years from 1986 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-14. 0.0000000000000141689856307614
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.4E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 70,576,682,485,228 random variables You don't actually need 70 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 36 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 36 because we have two variables measured over a period of 37 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.82, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Popularity of the first name August (Babies born) | 154 | 145 | 148 | 181 | 169 | 183 | 194 | 211 | 255 | 327 | 316 | 377 | 425 | 368 | 409 | 387 | 378 | 377 | 376 | 431 | 470 | 512 | 690 | 760 | 759 | 839 | 1077 | 1172 | 1776 | 2340 | 2319 | 2317 | 2589 | 2700 | 2743 | 3474 | 3722 |
Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America (Recalls) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 15 | 20 | 22 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data.
In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.
For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.
(This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([154,145,148,181,169,183,194,211,255,327,316,377,425,368,409,387,378,377,376,431,470,512,690,760,759,839,1077,1172,1776,2340,2319,2317,2589,2700,2743,3474,3722,])
array_2 = np.array([1,1,0,1,3,1,0,3,3,4,1,1,1,2,5,5,6,6,3,7,5,0,9,6,4,5,4,9,10,12,17,14,11,7,15,20,22,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name August"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name August
- Line chart for only Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: August Recalls: A Study in Name Popularity and Automotive Safety with Respect to Hyundai Motor America
Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!
Correlation ID: 1462 · Black Variable ID: 3226 · Red Variable ID: 1127