about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,434 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in linguistics and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the saying goes, "C'est la vie!": with fewer language experts, people just couldn't find the right words to erase their browsing history, leading to a decrease in searches for how to delete browsing history. It seems like without those Master's degrees, there were no másters of hiding internet footprints!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of an individual standing confidently with a Master's degree in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics in their hand. They are surrounded by a high-tech ambiance, with digital screens and holographic displays in the background. Next to the individual, a sleek, futuristic laptop is open to a Google search for "how to delete browsing history." The scene should exude a sense of pride and accomplishment, juxtaposed with a hint of technological privacy concerns. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Scalar art Concept art Hyper-realistic High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, an individual proudly holds their Master's degree in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and a laptop open to a Google search for "how to delete browsing history" sits next to them.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, an individual proudly holds their Master's degree in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and a laptop open to a Google search for "how to delete browsing history" sits next to them. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of an individual standing confidently with a Master's degree in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics in their hand. They are surrounded by a high-tech ambiance, with digital screens and holographic displays in the background. Next to the individual, a sleek, futuristic laptop is open to a Google search for "how to delete browsing history." The scene should exude a sense of pride and accomplishment, juxtaposed with a hint of technological privacy concerns.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics caused how to delete browsing history (Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'

The Journal of Language Learning and Digital Footprints

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating intersection of academic pursuits and clandestine internet activities by examining the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed a decade's worth of information from 2012 to 2021. Our investigation uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The results of this study provide compelling evidence that proficiency in foreign languages may directly influence individuals' inclinations or motivations to purge their digital footprints. This paradigm-shifting research sheds light on the intricate connections between linguistic expertise, digital privacy concerns, and the proclivity for internet housekeeping.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating intersection of academic pursuits and clandestine internet activities by examining the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed a decade's worth of information from 2012 to 2021. Our investigation uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The results of this study provide compelling evidence that proficiency in foreign languages may directly influence individuals' inclinations or motivations to purge their digital footprints. This paradigm-shifting research sheds light on the intricate connections between linguistic expertise, digital privacy concerns, and the proclivity for internet housekeeping.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between academic pursuits and internet behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. As the digital era continues to evolve, the ways in which individuals interact with the online world are constantly under examination. In this study, we focus on the peculiar nexus of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the ubiquitous yet somewhat clandestine act of searching for 'how to delete browsing history' on Google. While these two aspects may seem unrelated at first glance, our investigation seeks to unravel the intriguing conundrum that lies beneath the surface.

One may ponder, why delve into such an unconventional and seemingly whimsical subject? The answer lies in the potential implications and insights that may arise from this study. As the old adage goes, "curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back... to delete its browsing history." With this in mind, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of linguistic expertise and its correlation with online privacy concerns.

This study stands at the crossroads of academia and the digital realm, offering an interdisciplinary perspective that is as captivating as it is unexpected. Our intention is not only to quench the thirst for knowledge but also to unravel the enigmatic threads that weave together scholarly pursuits and covert cyber activities. By doing so, we hope to bring to light a new dimension of understanding and perhaps even a chuckle or two along the way.

The adventure begins by examining the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, where we unearth the intricate dance between foreign language mastery and the desire to sweep away one's digital traces. Prepare to be whisked away on a journey of unexpected connections and revelatory findings. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we welcome you to join us in unraveling "The Lingua Deceit": a tale of statistics, linguistics, and the quest for digital anonymity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating intersection of academic pursuits and clandestine internet activities by examining the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed a decade's worth of information from 2012 to 2021. Our investigation uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The results of this study provide compelling evidence that proficiency in foreign languages may directly influence individuals' inclinations or motivations to purge their digital footprints. This paradigm-shifting research sheds light on the intricate connections between linguistic expertise, digital privacy concerns, and the proclivity for internet housekeeping.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between academic pursuits and internet behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. As the digital era continues to evolve, the ways in which individuals interact with the online world are constantly under examination. In this study, we focus on the peculiar nexus of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the ubiquitous yet somewhat clandestine act of searching for 'how to delete browsing history' on Google. While these two aspects may seem unrelated at first glance, our investigation seeks to unravel the intriguing conundrum that lies beneath the surface.
One may ponder, why delve into such an unconventional and seemingly whimsical subject? The answer lies in the potential implications and insights that may arise from this study. As the old adage goes, "curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back... to delete its browsing history." With this in mind, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of linguistic expertise and its correlation with online privacy concerns.
This study stands at the crossroads of academia and the digital realm, offering an interdisciplinary perspective that is as captivating as it is unexpected. Our intention is not only to quench the thirst for knowledge but also to unravel the enigmatic threads that weave together scholarly pursuits and covert cyber activities. By doing so, we hope to bring to light a new dimension of understanding and perhaps even a chuckle or two along the way.
The adventure begins by examining the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, where we unearth the intricate dance between foreign language mastery and the desire to sweep away one's digital traces. Prepare to be whisked away on a journey of unexpected connections and revelatory findings. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we welcome you to join us in unraveling "The Lingua Deceit": a tale of statistics, linguistics, and the quest for digital anonymity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) provided a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and clandestine internet behaviors. Their study, which delved into the intricacies of linguistic expertise and its potential impact on online privacy concerns, laid a solid foundation for our current investigation. Building upon this scholarly groundwork, we venture further into the realms of academia and cyber shenanigans to uncover the hidden ties between foreign language mastery and the pressing urge to purge one's digital breadcrumb trail.

Jones (2018) expanded on this line of inquiry by exploring the linguistic intricacies of internet browsing habits. Their study revealed intriguing patterns in online search queries, shedding light on the covert maneuvers individuals employ to maintain a pristine digital facade. Drawing inspiration from these pioneering works, our research aims to elevate the discourse by scrutinizing the enigmatic relationship between linguistic proficiency and the inclination to erase one's digital tracks.

As we traverse deeper into this domain, it is essential to consider the broader context of language and literature. Works such as "The Language Instinct" by Steven Pinker and "In the Land of Invented Languages" by Arika Okrent offer valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of linguistic mastery and its influence on human cognition. These seminal texts serve as a reminder that language, whether foreign or vernacular, holds profound sway over our thoughts and actions, both online and offline.

Moreover, the realm of fiction provides intriguing glimpses into the complexities of linguistic expertise and digital subterfuge. Novels such as "The Shadow of the Wind" by Carlos Ruiz Zafón and "The Word Exchange" by Alena Graedon present captivating narratives that intertwine language, literature, and the clandestine machinations of the digital world. While these works may dwell in the realm of imagination, they offer subtle parallels to the real-world interplay between language proficiency and the desire to scrub one's digital presence.

In the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, we turned to popular culture for additional insights. Television shows like "The IT Crowd" and "Black Mirror" provide thought-provoking scenarios that touch upon digital privacy concerns and the whimsical nature of human behavior in the cyber domain. While these broadcasts may entertain and amuse, they also serve as poignant reflections of society's complex relationship with technology and the ever-present urge to sanitize one's online activities.

Armed with a rich tapestry of literature, both scholarly and creative, we embark on our investigation with fervent curiosity and a sprinkle of jest. The stage is set for an exploration that transcends traditional paradigms, unraveling the spellbinding connection between linguistic prowess and the clandestine quest for digital anonymity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating intersection of academic pursuits and clandestine internet activities by examining the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed a decade's worth of information from 2012 to 2021. Our investigation uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The results of this study provide compelling evidence that proficiency in foreign languages may directly influence individuals' inclinations or motivations to purge their digital footprints. This paradigm-shifting research sheds light on the intricate connections between linguistic expertise, digital privacy concerns, and the proclivity for internet housekeeping.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between academic pursuits and internet behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. As the digital era continues to evolve, the ways in which individuals interact with the online world are constantly under examination. In this study, we focus on the peculiar nexus of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the ubiquitous yet somewhat clandestine act of searching for 'how to delete browsing history' on Google. While these two aspects may seem unrelated at first glance, our investigation seeks to unravel the intriguing conundrum that lies beneath the surface.
One may ponder, why delve into such an unconventional and seemingly whimsical subject? The answer lies in the potential implications and insights that may arise from this study. As the old adage goes, "curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back... to delete its browsing history." With this in mind, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of linguistic expertise and its correlation with online privacy concerns.
This study stands at the crossroads of academia and the digital realm, offering an interdisciplinary perspective that is as captivating as it is unexpected. Our intention is not only to quench the thirst for knowledge but also to unravel the enigmatic threads that weave together scholarly pursuits and covert cyber activities. By doing so, we hope to bring to light a new dimension of understanding and perhaps even a chuckle or two along the way.
The adventure begins by examining the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, where we unearth the intricate dance between foreign language mastery and the desire to sweep away one's digital traces. Prepare to be whisked away on a journey of unexpected connections and revelatory findings. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we welcome you to join us in unraveling "The Lingua Deceit": a tale of statistics, linguistics, and the quest for digital anonymity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history', we embarked on an odyssey of data collection and analysis that would make even the most intrepid of researchers quiver in their ergonomic office chairs.

Data Collection:
Our team scoured the digital landscape, employing cutting-edge web scraping techniques to gather a treasure trove of information from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends. The National Center for Education Statistics provided us with the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics from the years 2012 to 2021, granting us access to the academic bedrock of linguistic expertise. Meanwhile, Google Trends bestowed upon us the gift of insight into the frequency of searches for 'how to delete browsing history' over the same period, illuminating the clandestine desires of internet dwellers seeking to erase their online past.

Data Analysis:
Armed with our formidable dataset, we meticulously applied the splendid tools of statistical analysis to uncover the hidden patterns within. Our journey was guided by the compass of correlation analysis, as we sought to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the search interest for purging digital footprints. Additionally, we employed time series analysis to capture the ebbs and flows of both linguistic conquests and digital cover-ups over the ten-year span.

Statistical Techniques:
The stalwart soldiers of statistical techniques, including Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis, were enlisted to wage war against uncertainty and unearth the elusive connection between linguistic prowess and the urge to expunge one's internet history. The Pearson correlation coefficient, with its unyielding measure of association, stood as a bastion of truth amidst the sea of data. Meanwhile, the gallant linear regression analysis valiantly sought to model the relationship, aiming to provide insights into the predictive power of Master's degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics on the search intent for deleting browsing history.

Validation and Robustness Checks:
As we traversed the treacherous terrain of statistical analysis, we meticulously scrutinized our findings to ensure the integrity and robustness of our conclusions. Sensitivity analyses and cross-validation procedures were conducted to fortify the validity of our results against lurking threats of spurious correlations and lurking variables, thereby bestowing upon our findings an armor of reliability.

Ethical Considerations:
In our quest for scholarly enlightenment, we upheld the noble principles of academic integrity and data privacy, ensuring that all data utilized in our study were handled with the utmost respect and in compliance with ethical guidelines. The identities of individuals were safeguarded through the aggregation and anonymization of data, preserving the sanctity of academic inquiry while honoring the digital rights of internet denizens.

In the annals of research history, our methodology shall stand as a testament to the dedication and audacity of explorers delving into the uncharted territories of academic intrigue and internet esoterica. Through the use of meticulous data collection, steadfast statistical analysis, and a touch of whimsy, we forged a path toward unraveling the captivating enigma of "The Lingua Deceit."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9698564, r-squared of 0.9406215, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating intersection of academic pursuits and clandestine internet activities by examining the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed a decade's worth of information from 2012 to 2021. Our investigation uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The results of this study provide compelling evidence that proficiency in foreign languages may directly influence individuals' inclinations or motivations to purge their digital footprints. This paradigm-shifting research sheds light on the intricate connections between linguistic expertise, digital privacy concerns, and the proclivity for internet housekeeping.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between academic pursuits and internet behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. As the digital era continues to evolve, the ways in which individuals interact with the online world are constantly under examination. In this study, we focus on the peculiar nexus of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the ubiquitous yet somewhat clandestine act of searching for 'how to delete browsing history' on Google. While these two aspects may seem unrelated at first glance, our investigation seeks to unravel the intriguing conundrum that lies beneath the surface.
One may ponder, why delve into such an unconventional and seemingly whimsical subject? The answer lies in the potential implications and insights that may arise from this study. As the old adage goes, "curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back... to delete its browsing history." With this in mind, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of linguistic expertise and its correlation with online privacy concerns.
This study stands at the crossroads of academia and the digital realm, offering an interdisciplinary perspective that is as captivating as it is unexpected. Our intention is not only to quench the thirst for knowledge but also to unravel the enigmatic threads that weave together scholarly pursuits and covert cyber activities. By doing so, we hope to bring to light a new dimension of understanding and perhaps even a chuckle or two along the way.
The adventure begins by examining the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, where we unearth the intricate dance between foreign language mastery and the desire to sweep away one's digital traces. Prepare to be whisked away on a journey of unexpected connections and revelatory findings. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we welcome you to join us in unraveling "The Lingua Deceit": a tale of statistics, linguistics, and the quest for digital anonymity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon delving into the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a mesmerizing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 suggested an exceptionally strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains, indicating that proficiency in foreign languages may indeed influence individuals' digital cleanliness habits.

To put it simply, it appears that the more Master's degrees in foreign languages one encounters, the more one may feel compelled to bid farewell to their digital footprints. It's as if multilingual prowess whispers in one's ear, prompting them to clear their browsing history, almost like a linguistic siren luring mariners into the waters of data erasure.

Our findings also revealed an impressive r-squared value of 0.9406215, signifying that a staggering 94% of the variability in the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' can be attributed to the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics. This suggests that linguistic proficiency holds a noteworthy influence over individuals' propensity to embark on a cyber scrubbing spree.

The statistical analysis further reaffirmed the robustness of these results, as the p-value of < 0.01 underscored the significance of the observed relationship. In other words, there is less than a 1% chance that this substantial connection is purely a fluke, and more than a 99% chance that there's a bona fide link between linguistic expertise and digital sanitization tendencies.

As an encapsulation of our findings, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the resoundingly strong correlation between Master's degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The scatterplot serves as a striking visual testament to the intriguing bond we uncovered, illustrating how linguistic mastery and the desire for digital housekeeping dance hand in hand, much like partners performing a linguistic tango on the dance floor of the internet.

In conclusion, this investigation has not only bolstered our understanding of the interplay between academic pursuits and online activities but has also sparked contemplation about the unforeseen ways in which language proficiency may influence individuals' inclinations to tidy up their online trails. Our findings have opened a veritable Pandora's box of questions and possibilities, suggesting that the world of linguistics and the labyrinth of internet privacy may be more intertwined than previously imagined. This paradigm-shifting research leaves us not only with a newfound appreciation for the enigmatic connections between linguistic expertise and digital behaviors but also with a lingering curiosity about what other surprises the intersection of academia and technology may hold.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating intersection of academic pursuits and clandestine internet activities by examining the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed a decade's worth of information from 2012 to 2021. Our investigation uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The results of this study provide compelling evidence that proficiency in foreign languages may directly influence individuals' inclinations or motivations to purge their digital footprints. This paradigm-shifting research sheds light on the intricate connections between linguistic expertise, digital privacy concerns, and the proclivity for internet housekeeping.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) provided a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and clandestine internet behaviors. Their study, which delved into the intricacies of linguistic expertise and its potential impact on online privacy concerns, laid a solid foundation for our current investigation. Building upon this scholarly groundwork, we venture further into the realms of academia and cyber shenanigans to uncover the hidden ties between foreign language mastery and the pressing urge to purge one's digital breadcrumb trail.
Jones (2018) expanded on this line of inquiry by exploring the linguistic intricacies of internet browsing habits. Their study revealed intriguing patterns in online search queries, shedding light on the covert maneuvers individuals employ to maintain a pristine digital facade. Drawing inspiration from these pioneering works, our research aims to elevate the discourse by scrutinizing the enigmatic relationship between linguistic proficiency and the inclination to erase one's digital tracks.
As we traverse deeper into this domain, it is essential to consider the broader context of language and literature. Works such as "The Language Instinct" by Steven Pinker and "In the Land of Invented Languages" by Arika Okrent offer valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of linguistic mastery and its influence on human cognition. These seminal texts serve as a reminder that language, whether foreign or vernacular, holds profound sway over our thoughts and actions, both online and offline.
Moreover, the realm of fiction provides intriguing glimpses into the complexities of linguistic expertise and digital subterfuge. Novels such as "The Shadow of the Wind" by Carlos Ruiz Zafón and "The Word Exchange" by Alena Graedon present captivating narratives that intertwine language, literature, and the clandestine machinations of the digital world. While these works may dwell in the realm of imagination, they offer subtle parallels to the real-world interplay between language proficiency and the desire to scrub one's digital presence.
In the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, we turned to popular culture for additional insights. Television shows like "The IT Crowd" and "Black Mirror" provide thought-provoking scenarios that touch upon digital privacy concerns and the whimsical nature of human behavior in the cyber domain. While these broadcasts may entertain and amuse, they also serve as poignant reflections of society's complex relationship with technology and the ever-present urge to sanitize one's online activities.
Armed with a rich tapestry of literature, both scholarly and creative, we embark on our investigation with fervent curiosity and a sprinkle of jest. The stage is set for an exploration that transcends traditional paradigms, unraveling the spellbinding connection between linguistic prowess and the clandestine quest for digital anonymity.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a mesmerizing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 suggested an exceptionally strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains, indicating that proficiency in foreign languages may indeed influence individuals' digital cleanliness habits.
To put it simply, it appears that the more Master's degrees in foreign languages one encounters, the more one may feel compelled to bid farewell to their digital footprints. It's as if multilingual prowess whispers in one's ear, prompting them to clear their browsing history, almost like a linguistic siren luring mariners into the waters of data erasure.
Our findings also revealed an impressive r-squared value of 0.9406215, signifying that a staggering 94% of the variability in the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' can be attributed to the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics. This suggests that linguistic proficiency holds a noteworthy influence over individuals' propensity to embark on a cyber scrubbing spree.
The statistical analysis further reaffirmed the robustness of these results, as the p-value of < 0.01 underscored the significance of the observed relationship. In other words, there is less than a 1% chance that this substantial connection is purely a fluke, and more than a 99% chance that there's a bona fide link between linguistic expertise and digital sanitization tendencies.
As an encapsulation of our findings, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the resoundingly strong correlation between Master's degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The scatterplot serves as a striking visual testament to the intriguing bond we uncovered, illustrating how linguistic mastery and the desire for digital housekeeping dance hand in hand, much like partners performing a linguistic tango on the dance floor of the internet.
In conclusion, this investigation has not only bolstered our understanding of the interplay between academic pursuits and online activities but has also sparked contemplation about the unforeseen ways in which language proficiency may influence individuals' inclinations to tidy up their online trails. Our findings have opened a veritable Pandora's box of questions and possibilities, suggesting that the world of linguistics and the labyrinth of internet privacy may be more intertwined than previously imagined. This paradigm-shifting research leaves us not only with a newfound appreciation for the enigmatic connections between linguistic expertise and digital behaviors but also with a lingering curiosity about what other surprises the intersection of academia and technology may hold.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study provide compelling evidence of a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Our findings echo the work of Smith and Doe (2015), who first ventured into the intriguing realm of linguistic expertise and clandestine internet behaviors. Considering the unexpected connection between language mastery and digital privacy concerns, our investigation not only substantiates the prior research but also delves into the uncharted territories of academia's influence on cyber hygiene.

Building upon the scholarly groundwork laid by previous researchers, our findings add a new dimension to the discourse by illuminating the profound sway of linguistic prowess on individuals' proclivity for purging their digital footprints. The resoundingly high correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value indicate that this relationship is not merely a whimsical happenstance but a robust and tangible association.

The literature review playfully touched upon unconventional sources of insight, such as novels and television shows, weaving a tapestry of interdisciplinary influences. Surprisingly, these creative narratives echoed our research findings in unforeseen ways, underscoring the underlying parallels between linguistic expertise and the clandestine manipulation of one's online persona. By infusing a sprinkle of jest into our scholarly pursuit, we have unearthed a surprising harmony between seemingly disparate domains, as if the enigmatic tendrils of language proficiency reach even into the cyber landscape.

Our results, reminiscent of a linguistic tango on the digital dance floor, serve as a captivating testament to the unexplored connections between academic pursuits and online behaviors. This paradigm-shifting research has unveiled the whimsical interplay between language mastery and the desire for digital housekeeping, sparking contemplation about the beguiling ways in which linguistic expertise permeates individuals' digital routines. Indeed, as we ponder the unexpected intersections revealed by this investigation, we find ourselves marveling at the hitherto unrecognized synergy between academia and the clandestine realms of online privacy and cyber subterfuge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating intersection of academic pursuits and clandestine internet activities by examining the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed a decade's worth of information from 2012 to 2021. Our investigation uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The results of this study provide compelling evidence that proficiency in foreign languages may directly influence individuals' inclinations or motivations to purge their digital footprints. This paradigm-shifting research sheds light on the intricate connections between linguistic expertise, digital privacy concerns, and the proclivity for internet housekeeping.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between academic pursuits and internet behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. As the digital era continues to evolve, the ways in which individuals interact with the online world are constantly under examination. In this study, we focus on the peculiar nexus of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the ubiquitous yet somewhat clandestine act of searching for 'how to delete browsing history' on Google. While these two aspects may seem unrelated at first glance, our investigation seeks to unravel the intriguing conundrum that lies beneath the surface.
One may ponder, why delve into such an unconventional and seemingly whimsical subject? The answer lies in the potential implications and insights that may arise from this study. As the old adage goes, "curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back... to delete its browsing history." With this in mind, we set out to explore the uncharted territory of linguistic expertise and its correlation with online privacy concerns.
This study stands at the crossroads of academia and the digital realm, offering an interdisciplinary perspective that is as captivating as it is unexpected. Our intention is not only to quench the thirst for knowledge but also to unravel the enigmatic threads that weave together scholarly pursuits and covert cyber activities. By doing so, we hope to bring to light a new dimension of understanding and perhaps even a chuckle or two along the way.
The adventure begins by examining the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, where we unearth the intricate dance between foreign language mastery and the desire to sweep away one's digital traces. Prepare to be whisked away on a journey of unexpected connections and revelatory findings. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we welcome you to join us in unraveling "The Lingua Deceit": a tale of statistics, linguistics, and the quest for digital anonymity.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the data collected from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a mesmerizing correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 suggested an exceptionally strong relationship between these seemingly disparate domains, indicating that proficiency in foreign languages may indeed influence individuals' digital cleanliness habits.
To put it simply, it appears that the more Master's degrees in foreign languages one encounters, the more one may feel compelled to bid farewell to their digital footprints. It's as if multilingual prowess whispers in one's ear, prompting them to clear their browsing history, almost like a linguistic siren luring mariners into the waters of data erasure.
Our findings also revealed an impressive r-squared value of 0.9406215, signifying that a staggering 94% of the variability in the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' can be attributed to the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics. This suggests that linguistic proficiency holds a noteworthy influence over individuals' propensity to embark on a cyber scrubbing spree.
The statistical analysis further reaffirmed the robustness of these results, as the p-value of < 0.01 underscored the significance of the observed relationship. In other words, there is less than a 1% chance that this substantial connection is purely a fluke, and more than a 99% chance that there's a bona fide link between linguistic expertise and digital sanitization tendencies.
As an encapsulation of our findings, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the resoundingly strong correlation between Master's degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The scatterplot serves as a striking visual testament to the intriguing bond we uncovered, illustrating how linguistic mastery and the desire for digital housekeeping dance hand in hand, much like partners performing a linguistic tango on the dance floor of the internet.
In conclusion, this investigation has not only bolstered our understanding of the interplay between academic pursuits and online activities but has also sparked contemplation about the unforeseen ways in which language proficiency may influence individuals' inclinations to tidy up their online trails. Our findings have opened a veritable Pandora's box of questions and possibilities, suggesting that the world of linguistics and the labyrinth of internet privacy may be more intertwined than previously imagined. This paradigm-shifting research leaves us not only with a newfound appreciation for the enigmatic connections between linguistic expertise and digital behaviors but also with a lingering curiosity about what other surprises the intersection of academia and technology may hold.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up this study, we find ourselves in a state of bemused bewonderment at the unexpected yet incontrovertible correlation between Master's degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the pervasive quest for digital housekeeping. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also compel a myriad of puns and quips about the linguistic tango of 'how to delete browsing history' queries. It seems that the allure of multilingual mastery extends beyond eloquent prose and into the clandestine realm of cyber scrubs, enticing individuals to bid adieu to their virtual footprints.

While the statistical significance of our results is undeniable, we are left pondering the immeasurable depths of linguistic influence in the digital domain. The allure of linguistic prowess on the digital housekeeping chore remains a mystery worthy of further exploration, much like a cryptic riddle waiting to be solved. Yet, in the spirit of academic decorum, we assert with utmost seriousness and without a smidgeon of irony that no further research may be necessary in this area. The linguistic tango of internet privacy has been elegantly unmasked, leaving us to marvel at the delightful incongruities and unexpected connections that permeate the realms of academia and digital enigmas.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Language Learning and Digital Footprints


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Multilingual Integrity Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Lingua Deceit: Investigating the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and Search Queries for 'How to Delete Browsing History' with an abstract of This study delves into the fascinating intersection of academic pursuits and clandestine internet activities by examining the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Foreign Languages, Literatures, and Linguistics and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed a decade's worth of information from 2012 to 2021. Our investigation uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9698564 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The results of this study provide compelling evidence that proficiency in foreign languages may directly influence individuals' inclinations or motivations to purge their digital footprints. This paradigm-shifting research sheds light on the intricate connections between linguistic expertise, digital privacy concerns, and the proclivity for internet housekeeping.

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees, Foreign Languages, Literatures, Linguistics, Google searches, Browsing history, Linguistic expertise, Digital privacy, Internet housekeeping, Language proficiency, Academic achievements, Internet searches, Data analysis, Correlation study, Google Trends, Education statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in linguistics
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in linguistics

Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'

Correlation r = 0.9698564 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9406215 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in linguistics) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.5E-6. 0.0000034830556071207620000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00035% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 287,104 random variables You don't actually need 287 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in linguistics (Degrees awarded)3827370834823566340732713261308129302884
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' (Rel. search volume)85.7578.083377.416770.083356.416754.083350.416740.583338.416729.9167




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3827,3708,3482,3566,3407,3271,3261,3081,2930,2884,])
array_2 = np.array([85.75,78.0833,77.4167,70.0833,56.4167,54.0833,50.4167,40.5833,38.4167,29.9167,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in linguistics"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 1434 · Black Variable ID: 1324 · Red Variable ID: 1384
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0