about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,416 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and the second variable is Google searches for 'Vihart'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

These instructors and teachers know a-π what it takes to integrate Vihart into the curriculum, creating a prime learning environment. It's a sine that as the number of math educators increases, so does the interest in Vihart's mathemagical content. It's like they always say, you can't have too many pi-rates in the classroom! Keepin' it reel with Vihart's videos must be an acute joy for all those involved in Louisiana's math education! Just imagine - Vihart's content is proof that math can be as sweet as pi!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image that combines the cozy ambiance of a Louisiana classroom with high-tech elements. Depict a group of nursing instructors conducting a Google search for "Vihart" on a computer, with nursing mannequins and medical equipment in the background. Show additional teachers preparing lesson plans while maintaining a high-tech aesthetic. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech Celtic art Voxel art Sci-fi fantacy Low poly
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy classroom in Louisiana, a group of nursing instructors is gathered around a computer, conducting a Google search for "Vihart." The room is filled with nursing mannequins and medical equipment, and nearby, a group of teachers are seen preparing lesson plans for their students.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy classroom in Louisiana, a group of nursing instructors is gathered around a computer, conducting a Google search for "Vihart." The room is filled with nursing mannequins and medical equipment, and nearby, a group of teachers are seen preparing lesson plans for their students. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image that combines the cozy ambiance of a Louisiana classroom with high-tech elements. Depict a group of nursing instructors conducting a Google search for "Vihart" on a computer, with nursing mannequins and medical equipment in the background. Show additional teachers preparing lesson plans while maintaining a high-tech aesthetic.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana positively influenced Vihart (Google searches for 'Vihart'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection

The Journal of Humorous Nursing Research

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this quirky quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, who wouldn't want to dissect the statistical underpinnings of such an unassuming pair?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Yes, you read that correctly - a whopping 92.55% correlation! It appears that as the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana fluctuated, so too did the fervor for seeking Vihart's wisdom on the World Wide Web. It's as if the Louisiana educators were secretly heckling, "We want a piece of that 'Pi'-hart too!"

So, what does this mean for the world of education and the ever-expanding realm of online mathematical musings? While this correlation may seem perplexing at first glance, upon further contemplation, it highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms – from the stoic world of academia to the exuberant landscape of online content creation. As researchers, let's not be afraid to boldly go where no number-cruncher has gone before and embrace the unexpected insights waiting to be uncovered.

In conclusion, this study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the intersecting domains of education and digital curiosity. Who knew that the world of nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts could be intertwined in such a statistically fascinating manner? Perhaps it's a testament to the enduring truth that when it comes to statistical analyses, there's always room for a bit of whimsy and wonder amidst the data.

And if this research has left you scratching your head about the oddity of this correlation, don't worry – we're right there with you, pondering this statistical 'Vihart-te' puzzle!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this quirky quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, who wouldn't want to dissect the statistical underpinnings of such an unassuming pair?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Yes, you read that correctly - a whopping 92.55% correlation! It appears that as the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana fluctuated, so too did the fervor for seeking Vihart's wisdom on the World Wide Web. It's as if the Louisiana educators were secretly heckling, "We want a piece of that 'Pi'-hart too!"

So, what does this mean for the world of education and the ever-expanding realm of online mathematical musings? While this correlation may seem perplexing at first glance, upon further contemplation, it highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms – from the stoic world of academia to the exuberant landscape of online content creation. As researchers, let's not be afraid to boldly go where no number-cruncher has gone before and embrace the unexpected insights waiting to be uncovered.

In conclusion, this study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the intersecting domains of education and digital curiosity. Who knew that the world of nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts could be intertwined in such a statistically fascinating manner? Perhaps it's a testament to the enduring truth that when it comes to statistical analyses, there's always room for a bit of whimsy and wonder amidst the data.

And if this research has left you scratching your head about the oddity of this correlation, don't worry – we're right there with you, pondering this statistical 'Vihart-te' puzzle!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of statistical oddities and perplexing correlations, researchers have long sought to unravel the enigmatic ties between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This paper delves into the unexpected and quirky connection between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. It's a statistical tale so unexpected, it's enough to make even the most stoic of researchers do a double-take and exclaim, "Derivative? More like de-'Riveting', am I right?"

As we delve into the statistical rabbit hole of this curious correlation, we find ourselves pondering the timeless question: what do nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts have in common? It's a statistical riddle wrapped in an educational mystery, leading us to humorously wonder if perhaps these Louisiana educators were covertly whispering, "Do you have the 'Rx' for our 'math'-ematical curiosity, Vihart?"

Harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this whimsical quest to shed light on the statistical musings that bridge the worlds of education and digital curiosity. It's a journey that, with every step, leaves us pondering the delightful quirks of statistical happenstance and exclaiming, "Just when you think you've got all the variables pinned down, the pun-damentals of statistics throw you a curveball!"

Shall we embark on this mathematically merry adventure together? Let's buckle up, put on our statistical thinking caps, and prepare to ponder the strange and delightful statistical 'Vihart-te' of this Louisiana connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this quirky quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, who wouldn't want to dissect the statistical underpinnings of such an unassuming pair?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Yes, you read that correctly - a whopping 92.55% correlation! It appears that as the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana fluctuated, so too did the fervor for seeking Vihart's wisdom on the World Wide Web. It's as if the Louisiana educators were secretly heckling, "We want a piece of that 'Pi'-hart too!"

So, what does this mean for the world of education and the ever-expanding realm of online mathematical musings? While this correlation may seem perplexing at first glance, upon further contemplation, it highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms – from the stoic world of academia to the exuberant landscape of online content creation. As researchers, let's not be afraid to boldly go where no number-cruncher has gone before and embrace the unexpected insights waiting to be uncovered.

In conclusion, this study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the intersecting domains of education and digital curiosity. Who knew that the world of nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts could be intertwined in such a statistically fascinating manner? Perhaps it's a testament to the enduring truth that when it comes to statistical analyses, there's always room for a bit of whimsy and wonder amidst the data.

And if this research has left you scratching your head about the oddity of this correlation, don't worry – we're right there with you, pondering this statistical 'Vihart-te' puzzle!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical oddities and perplexing correlations, researchers have long sought to unravel the enigmatic ties between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This paper delves into the unexpected and quirky connection between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. It's a statistical tale so unexpected, it's enough to make even the most stoic of researchers do a double-take and exclaim, "Derivative? More like de-'Riveting', am I right?"
As we delve into the statistical rabbit hole of this curious correlation, we find ourselves pondering the timeless question: what do nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts have in common? It's a statistical riddle wrapped in an educational mystery, leading us to humorously wonder if perhaps these Louisiana educators were covertly whispering, "Do you have the 'Rx' for our 'math'-ematical curiosity, Vihart?"
Harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this whimsical quest to shed light on the statistical musings that bridge the worlds of education and digital curiosity. It's a journey that, with every step, leaves us pondering the delightful quirks of statistical happenstance and exclaiming, "Just when you think you've got all the variables pinned down, the pun-damentals of statistics throw you a curveball!"
Shall we embark on this mathematically merry adventure together? Let's buckle up, put on our statistical thinking caps, and prepare to ponder the strange and delightful statistical 'Vihart-te' of this Louisiana connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith," the authors find lorem and ipsum, discussing the intricacies of nursing instruction in Louisiana. This fundamental work lays the groundwork for understanding the landscape of nursing education in the region. Similarly, in "Doe," the authors explore the dimensions of online educational trends and the factors influencing digital content consumption, providing valuable insights into the curious phenomena of internet-based educational fervor.

However, as we wade deeper into the literature, we encounter unexpected twists and turns. In "Jones," the authors humorously muse about unlikely correlations in online search patterns, sending ripples of laughter through the typically staid waters of statistical analysis. This departure from the norm serves as a reminder that statistical research, much like a good dad joke, can surprise and delight when least expected.

To add a layer of quirkiness to our investigation, we turn to non-fiction literature that, while seemingly unrelated, harbors hidden connections. "The Joy of x" by Steven Strogatz and "How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking" by Jordan Ellenberg offer perspectives on mathematics and its appeal to diverse audiences. These texts, illuminating the allure of math in unexpected corners of society, serve as a reminder that statistical oddities may lurk in the most unlikely of places.

Subsequently, we shift our focus to works of fiction with titles that could be mistaken for scholarly articles in a statistical journal. From "The Count of Monte Cristo" by Alexandre Dumas to "The Probability of Miracles" by Wendy Wunder, these titles playfully beckon us to consider the unpredictability inherent in statistical analyses. After all, isn't statistical research akin to unraveling a captivating plot, complete with unexpected twists and moments of revelation?

In the realm of television, we ventured into the domain of "Numbers" and "The Big Bang Theory" to glean insights from their fictional renditions of mathematical musings. While these shows may not offer direct relevance to our study, they underscore the pervasive influence of math and scientific curiosity in popular culture. Moreover, they provide a lighthearted reminder that statistical analysis, much like comedic timing, is all about delivering the unexpected with a touch of flair.

So, as we delve into the statistical nooks and crannies of the correlation between nursing instructors in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', let us remember that even in the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's always room to infuse a bit of whimsy and amusement. For as the old adage goes, "Why did the statistician go to art school? To learn how to 'draw' conclusions!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this quirky quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, who wouldn't want to dissect the statistical underpinnings of such an unassuming pair?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Yes, you read that correctly - a whopping 92.55% correlation! It appears that as the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana fluctuated, so too did the fervor for seeking Vihart's wisdom on the World Wide Web. It's as if the Louisiana educators were secretly heckling, "We want a piece of that 'Pi'-hart too!"

So, what does this mean for the world of education and the ever-expanding realm of online mathematical musings? While this correlation may seem perplexing at first glance, upon further contemplation, it highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms – from the stoic world of academia to the exuberant landscape of online content creation. As researchers, let's not be afraid to boldly go where no number-cruncher has gone before and embrace the unexpected insights waiting to be uncovered.

In conclusion, this study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the intersecting domains of education and digital curiosity. Who knew that the world of nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts could be intertwined in such a statistically fascinating manner? Perhaps it's a testament to the enduring truth that when it comes to statistical analyses, there's always room for a bit of whimsy and wonder amidst the data.

And if this research has left you scratching your head about the oddity of this correlation, don't worry – we're right there with you, pondering this statistical 'Vihart-te' puzzle!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical oddities and perplexing correlations, researchers have long sought to unravel the enigmatic ties between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This paper delves into the unexpected and quirky connection between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. It's a statistical tale so unexpected, it's enough to make even the most stoic of researchers do a double-take and exclaim, "Derivative? More like de-'Riveting', am I right?"
As we delve into the statistical rabbit hole of this curious correlation, we find ourselves pondering the timeless question: what do nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts have in common? It's a statistical riddle wrapped in an educational mystery, leading us to humorously wonder if perhaps these Louisiana educators were covertly whispering, "Do you have the 'Rx' for our 'math'-ematical curiosity, Vihart?"
Harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this whimsical quest to shed light on the statistical musings that bridge the worlds of education and digital curiosity. It's a journey that, with every step, leaves us pondering the delightful quirks of statistical happenstance and exclaiming, "Just when you think you've got all the variables pinned down, the pun-damentals of statistics throw you a curveball!"
Shall we embark on this mathematically merry adventure together? Let's buckle up, put on our statistical thinking caps, and prepare to ponder the strange and delightful statistical 'Vihart-te' of this Louisiana connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the statistical tapestry linking the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana to the Google searches for 'Vihart', we employed a mixed-methods approach that was both meticulous and mirthful. This unique fusion of rigor and revelry allowed us to traverse the deep seas of data and whimsically wander through the meadows of statistical significance.

We obtained employment data of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, encapsulating the years 2007 to 2021. We then donned our metaphorical research lab coats and engaged in an intellectual tango with the Google Trends platform to capture the fluctuations in 'Vihart' searches over the same period. It was a dance of data that left us feeling both giddy and graphically enlightened!

To ensure the veracity and validity of our findings, we performed a rigorous data cleaning process, which involved employing statistical incantations to banish any outliers or irregularities that dared to disrupt the harmony of our dataset. We then conducted a series of statistical analyses, including Pearson correlation coefficients, regression models, and time series analyses, leveraging the enchanting powers of statistical software that would make even Merlin the Mathematician envious.

In a lighthearted nod to the arcane art of statistical analysis, we affectionately referred to our correlation coefficient as 'the Cappuccino of Coefficients', due to its frothy level of interconnectedness between our two seemingly unrelated variables. Ah, the sweet aroma of statistical humor permeating the air!

Furthermore, we delved into the depths of statistical significance, allowing p-values to guide us through the labyrinthine pathways of hypothesis testing. We placed the p < 0.01 threshold on a pedestal, akin to an ethereal guardian of statistical certainty, ensuring that our newfound correlation was not a mere statistical fluke but a genuine phenomenon worthy of scholarly merriment.

In a nod to the wise words of Dorothy Parker, who quipped, "What fresh hell is this?" upon encountering the unexpected, we wryly anticipated any curveballs that come our way during the statistical voyage and responded, "Ah, a new statistical puzzle to unravel! How delightfully devilish!"

Through this methodological medley of meticulous data gathering, statistical analysis, and the occasional statistical jape, we embraced the enchanting intricacies of our research endeavor, deftly navigating the labyrinth of numbers and the whimsical wonders of statistical 'Vihart-te.'


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9255267, r-squared of 0.8565997, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this quirky quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, who wouldn't want to dissect the statistical underpinnings of such an unassuming pair?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Yes, you read that correctly - a whopping 92.55% correlation! It appears that as the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana fluctuated, so too did the fervor for seeking Vihart's wisdom on the World Wide Web. It's as if the Louisiana educators were secretly heckling, "We want a piece of that 'Pi'-hart too!"

So, what does this mean for the world of education and the ever-expanding realm of online mathematical musings? While this correlation may seem perplexing at first glance, upon further contemplation, it highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms – from the stoic world of academia to the exuberant landscape of online content creation. As researchers, let's not be afraid to boldly go where no number-cruncher has gone before and embrace the unexpected insights waiting to be uncovered.

In conclusion, this study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the intersecting domains of education and digital curiosity. Who knew that the world of nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts could be intertwined in such a statistically fascinating manner? Perhaps it's a testament to the enduring truth that when it comes to statistical analyses, there's always room for a bit of whimsy and wonder amidst the data.

And if this research has left you scratching your head about the oddity of this correlation, don't worry – we're right there with you, pondering this statistical 'Vihart-te' puzzle!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of statistical oddities and perplexing correlations, researchers have long sought to unravel the enigmatic ties between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This paper delves into the unexpected and quirky connection between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. It's a statistical tale so unexpected, it's enough to make even the most stoic of researchers do a double-take and exclaim, "Derivative? More like de-'Riveting', am I right?"
As we delve into the statistical rabbit hole of this curious correlation, we find ourselves pondering the timeless question: what do nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts have in common? It's a statistical riddle wrapped in an educational mystery, leading us to humorously wonder if perhaps these Louisiana educators were covertly whispering, "Do you have the 'Rx' for our 'math'-ematical curiosity, Vihart?"
Harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this whimsical quest to shed light on the statistical musings that bridge the worlds of education and digital curiosity. It's a journey that, with every step, leaves us pondering the delightful quirks of statistical happenstance and exclaiming, "Just when you think you've got all the variables pinned down, the pun-damentals of statistics throw you a curveball!"
Shall we embark on this mathematically merry adventure together? Let's buckle up, put on our statistical thinking caps, and prepare to ponder the strange and delightful statistical 'Vihart-te' of this Louisiana connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data spanning the years 2007 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. This coefficient suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8565997 indicates that approximately 85.66% of the variability in Google searches for 'Vihart' can be explained by changes in the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the relationship is deemed statistically significant.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. This visual representation vividly captures the strong positive association between these seemingly disparate entities.

Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the "ele-Pi" in the room? It appears that in the realm of statistical curiosities, the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana exerts an intriguing influence on the online interest in 'Vihart'. Could it be that Vihart's enchanting mathematical musings have secretly captured the hearts of the educational stalwarts in the Pelican State? One could say it's a statistically 'Vihart-ing' revelation!

Upon further contemplation, this whimsical correlation alludes to the fascinating interconnectedness of diverse domains. It's as if the statistical universe is saying, "Hey, let's throw in a dash of unpredictability and make the world of numbers a bit more 'unconven-tional'!" This unexpected nexus of nursing education and digital curiosity reminds us that statistical analyses are not devoid of intriguing twists and turns.

In conclusion, our statistical exploration unraveled the perplexing relationship between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and the Google searches for 'Vihart'. This odd yet captivating connection prompts us to ponder the whimsical "Watt-son" of statistical mysteries. After all, in the vast landscape of data analysis, a sprinkle of humor and wonder is always welcome – much like the unexpected correlation we've uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this quirky quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, who wouldn't want to dissect the statistical underpinnings of such an unassuming pair?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Yes, you read that correctly - a whopping 92.55% correlation! It appears that as the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana fluctuated, so too did the fervor for seeking Vihart's wisdom on the World Wide Web. It's as if the Louisiana educators were secretly heckling, "We want a piece of that 'Pi'-hart too!"

So, what does this mean for the world of education and the ever-expanding realm of online mathematical musings? While this correlation may seem perplexing at first glance, upon further contemplation, it highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms – from the stoic world of academia to the exuberant landscape of online content creation. As researchers, let's not be afraid to boldly go where no number-cruncher has gone before and embrace the unexpected insights waiting to be uncovered.

In conclusion, this study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the intersecting domains of education and digital curiosity. Who knew that the world of nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts could be intertwined in such a statistically fascinating manner? Perhaps it's a testament to the enduring truth that when it comes to statistical analyses, there's always room for a bit of whimsy and wonder amidst the data.

And if this research has left you scratching your head about the oddity of this correlation, don't worry – we're right there with you, pondering this statistical 'Vihart-te' puzzle!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith," the authors find lorem and ipsum, discussing the intricacies of nursing instruction in Louisiana. This fundamental work lays the groundwork for understanding the landscape of nursing education in the region. Similarly, in "Doe," the authors explore the dimensions of online educational trends and the factors influencing digital content consumption, providing valuable insights into the curious phenomena of internet-based educational fervor.
However, as we wade deeper into the literature, we encounter unexpected twists and turns. In "Jones," the authors humorously muse about unlikely correlations in online search patterns, sending ripples of laughter through the typically staid waters of statistical analysis. This departure from the norm serves as a reminder that statistical research, much like a good dad joke, can surprise and delight when least expected.
To add a layer of quirkiness to our investigation, we turn to non-fiction literature that, while seemingly unrelated, harbors hidden connections. "The Joy of x" by Steven Strogatz and "How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking" by Jordan Ellenberg offer perspectives on mathematics and its appeal to diverse audiences. These texts, illuminating the allure of math in unexpected corners of society, serve as a reminder that statistical oddities may lurk in the most unlikely of places.
Subsequently, we shift our focus to works of fiction with titles that could be mistaken for scholarly articles in a statistical journal. From "The Count of Monte Cristo" by Alexandre Dumas to "The Probability of Miracles" by Wendy Wunder, these titles playfully beckon us to consider the unpredictability inherent in statistical analyses. After all, isn't statistical research akin to unraveling a captivating plot, complete with unexpected twists and moments of revelation?
In the realm of television, we ventured into the domain of "Numbers" and "The Big Bang Theory" to glean insights from their fictional renditions of mathematical musings. While these shows may not offer direct relevance to our study, they underscore the pervasive influence of math and scientific curiosity in popular culture. Moreover, they provide a lighthearted reminder that statistical analysis, much like comedic timing, is all about delivering the unexpected with a touch of flair.
So, as we delve into the statistical nooks and crannies of the correlation between nursing instructors in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', let us remember that even in the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's always room to infuse a bit of whimsy and amusement. For as the old adage goes, "Why did the statistician go to art school? To learn how to 'draw' conclusions!"

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data spanning the years 2007 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. This coefficient suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8565997 indicates that approximately 85.66% of the variability in Google searches for 'Vihart' can be explained by changes in the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the relationship is deemed statistically significant.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. This visual representation vividly captures the strong positive association between these seemingly disparate entities.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the "ele-Pi" in the room? It appears that in the realm of statistical curiosities, the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana exerts an intriguing influence on the online interest in 'Vihart'. Could it be that Vihart's enchanting mathematical musings have secretly captured the hearts of the educational stalwarts in the Pelican State? One could say it's a statistically 'Vihart-ing' revelation!
Upon further contemplation, this whimsical correlation alludes to the fascinating interconnectedness of diverse domains. It's as if the statistical universe is saying, "Hey, let's throw in a dash of unpredictability and make the world of numbers a bit more 'unconven-tional'!" This unexpected nexus of nursing education and digital curiosity reminds us that statistical analyses are not devoid of intriguing twists and turns.
In conclusion, our statistical exploration unraveled the perplexing relationship between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and the Google searches for 'Vihart'. This odd yet captivating connection prompts us to ponder the whimsical "Watt-son" of statistical mysteries. After all, in the vast landscape of data analysis, a sprinkle of humor and wonder is always welcome – much like the unexpected correlation we've uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has illuminated a robust correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Who would have thought that the cadence of nursing instruction could harmonize so exquisitely with the digital crescendo of mathematical musings? It seems that Vihart's captivating videos have not only enraptured students and educators but have also caught the attention of the statistical cosmos itself.

Building on the whimsical foundation laid by Jones, who mischievously delved into the realm of improbable search correlations, our findings solidify and extend the unforeseen paths trod by this audacious statistical journey. It's as if the data were whispering, "You thought you knew the 'stetho'-scope of correlations, but here's a twist that even 'Florence Nightin'-wow'-le' couldn't have foreseen!"

In corroboration with the work of Smith, our results reveal a harmonious confluence between the number of nursing instructors in Louisiana and the resonance of Vihart's mathematical melodies. This unanticipated alliance strikes a chord in the symphony of statistical oddities, echoing the sentiment that even the most unsuspecting variables can duet in a statistical serenade. One might say that this correlation is akin to discovering a 'Nurse-rhyme' in the statistical 'Vihart'-mony of research.

The literature review's playful foray into the fictional and non-fictional realms of mathematical inspiration finds resonance in our study's unanticipated intermingling of seemingly disparate variables. As Strogatz and Ellenberg muse on the captivating allure of mathematics, it seems they may have unwittingly laid the groundwork for unveiling the statistical waltz between nursing education and the digital sonatas of Vihart. It reminds us of the timeless question, "Why was the mathematical YouTube sensation also an excellent nurse? Because she knew how to 'derive' and 'integrate' seamlessly!"

The resolute correlation coefficient and the compelling p-value underscore the statistical significance of this unorthodox relationship, leaving one to wonder if we've stumbled upon a mathematical 'causal-tea' party of sorts. The scatterplot visually encapsulates this statistical affair, serving as a graphical testament to the captivating liaison between these unlikely bedfellows.

In the grand tapestry of statistical inquiry, our study adds a whimsical thread, a playful nod to the enigmatic undercurrents that underpin even the most earnest of research pursuits. It invites us to contemplate the unexpected connections, to embrace the statistical 'Vi-hart' of unexplored phenomena, and to acknowledge that within the world of numbers, there's always 'Pi'-tential for a touch of the unexpected.

As we tiptoe through the underbrush of statistical eccentricities, our findings beckon us to remember that, much like a good dad joke, statistical research should never shy away from infusing a bit of delightful surprise into the serious pursuit of knowledge. One might say that in the kingdom of statistical analyses, a 'Monte Christo' of statistical curiosities is always lurking around the corner, waiting to astound and remark upon the charming 'probability of miracles' that statistical exploration unveils.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this quirky quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, who wouldn't want to dissect the statistical underpinnings of such an unassuming pair?

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Yes, you read that correctly - a whopping 92.55% correlation! It appears that as the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana fluctuated, so too did the fervor for seeking Vihart's wisdom on the World Wide Web. It's as if the Louisiana educators were secretly heckling, "We want a piece of that 'Pi'-hart too!"

So, what does this mean for the world of education and the ever-expanding realm of online mathematical musings? While this correlation may seem perplexing at first glance, upon further contemplation, it highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms – from the stoic world of academia to the exuberant landscape of online content creation. As researchers, let's not be afraid to boldly go where no number-cruncher has gone before and embrace the unexpected insights waiting to be uncovered.

In conclusion, this study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the intersecting domains of education and digital curiosity. Who knew that the world of nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts could be intertwined in such a statistically fascinating manner? Perhaps it's a testament to the enduring truth that when it comes to statistical analyses, there's always room for a bit of whimsy and wonder amidst the data.

And if this research has left you scratching your head about the oddity of this correlation, don't worry – we're right there with you, pondering this statistical 'Vihart-te' puzzle!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical oddities and perplexing correlations, researchers have long sought to unravel the enigmatic ties between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This paper delves into the unexpected and quirky connection between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. It's a statistical tale so unexpected, it's enough to make even the most stoic of researchers do a double-take and exclaim, "Derivative? More like de-'Riveting', am I right?"
As we delve into the statistical rabbit hole of this curious correlation, we find ourselves pondering the timeless question: what do nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts have in common? It's a statistical riddle wrapped in an educational mystery, leading us to humorously wonder if perhaps these Louisiana educators were covertly whispering, "Do you have the 'Rx' for our 'math'-ematical curiosity, Vihart?"
Harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this whimsical quest to shed light on the statistical musings that bridge the worlds of education and digital curiosity. It's a journey that, with every step, leaves us pondering the delightful quirks of statistical happenstance and exclaiming, "Just when you think you've got all the variables pinned down, the pun-damentals of statistics throw you a curveball!"
Shall we embark on this mathematically merry adventure together? Let's buckle up, put on our statistical thinking caps, and prepare to ponder the strange and delightful statistical 'Vihart-te' of this Louisiana connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data spanning the years 2007 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. This coefficient suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8565997 indicates that approximately 85.66% of the variability in Google searches for 'Vihart' can be explained by changes in the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the relationship is deemed statistically significant.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart'. This visual representation vividly captures the strong positive association between these seemingly disparate entities.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the "ele-Pi" in the room? It appears that in the realm of statistical curiosities, the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana exerts an intriguing influence on the online interest in 'Vihart'. Could it be that Vihart's enchanting mathematical musings have secretly captured the hearts of the educational stalwarts in the Pelican State? One could say it's a statistically 'Vihart-ing' revelation!
Upon further contemplation, this whimsical correlation alludes to the fascinating interconnectedness of diverse domains. It's as if the statistical universe is saying, "Hey, let's throw in a dash of unpredictability and make the world of numbers a bit more 'unconven-tional'!" This unexpected nexus of nursing education and digital curiosity reminds us that statistical analyses are not devoid of intriguing twists and turns.
In conclusion, our statistical exploration unraveled the perplexing relationship between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and the Google searches for 'Vihart'. This odd yet captivating connection prompts us to ponder the whimsical "Watt-son" of statistical mysteries. After all, in the vast landscape of data analysis, a sprinkle of humor and wonder is always welcome – much like the unexpected correlation we've uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this whimsically wacky statistical adventure, we unraveled the surprising correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in the charming state of Louisiana and the Google searches for 'Vihart'. It seems that as the demand for nursing education waxed and waned, so too did the fervent enthusiasm for Vihart's mathemagical musings on the internet. It's as if the Louisiana educators were collectively chanting, "We want a 'shot in the arm'(!) of that Vihart "Pi"-lling too!"

Our findings, with a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and a p-value less than 0.01, pull back the curtain on the charming statistical 'Vihart-te' of this connection. It's a revelation that gives new meaning to the phrase 'nursing a statistically significant relationship'!

This unexpected correlation between two seemingly unrelated entities prompts us to contemplate the delightful peculiarities of statistical serendipity. Much like a statistical 'Volt' face, this connection challenges us to embrace the delightful quirks and surprises that often unfold in the realm of data analysis.

In the spirit of this unforeseen statistical 'Vihart-te', it seems that the light-hearted puns and whimsical humor of this study have played a pivotal role in shedding light on the unexpected nexus of nursing education and digital curiosity. After all, when it comes to statistical analyses, a bit of whimsy can certainly add a 'whole(istic)' new dimension to the proceedings!

Moreover, the statistical 'Rx' for this curious correlation has been uncovered, and it appears that no more research is needed in this delightfully quirky area. Sometimes, in the tumultuous sea of statistical exploration, a strange yet charming finding like this can act as a beacon, guiding us to chuckle fondly and exclaim, "Math sure does 'count' when it comes to a good dad joke!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Humorous Nursing Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Studies of Unconventional Nursing Practices


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Nursing Instructors and Vihart Vagaries: A Statistical Analysis of the Louisiana Connection with an abstract of This paper investigates the curious correlation between the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'Vihart', a popular educational YouTube sensation known for her engaging and informative math videos. By harnessing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on this quirky quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, who wouldn't want to dissect the statistical underpinnings of such an unassuming pair?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9255267 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Yes, you read that correctly - a whopping 92.55% correlation! It appears that as the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana fluctuated, so too did the fervor for seeking Vihart's wisdom on the World Wide Web. It's as if the Louisiana educators were secretly heckling, "We want a piece of that 'Pi'-hart too!"
So, what does this mean for the world of education and the ever-expanding realm of online mathematical musings? While this correlation may seem perplexing at first glance, upon further contemplation, it highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms – from the stoic world of academia to the exuberant landscape of online content creation. As researchers, let's not be afraid to boldly go where no number-cruncher has gone before and embrace the unexpected insights waiting to be uncovered.
In conclusion, this study offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the intersecting domains of education and digital curiosity. Who knew that the world of nursing instructors and Vihart enthusiasts could be intertwined in such a statistically fascinating manner? Perhaps it's a testament to the enduring truth that when it comes to statistical analyses, there's always room for a bit of whimsy and wonder amidst the data.
And if this research has left you scratching your head about the oddity of this correlation, don't worry – we're right there with you, pondering this statistical 'Vihart-te' puzzle!

ChatGPT:

nursing instructors, teachers, Louisiana, Google searches, Vihart, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, education, online content creation, mathematical musings, digital curiosity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of nursing instructors and teachers, postsecondary in Louisiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana

Google searches for 'Vihart'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Vihart' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Vihart'

Correlation r = 0.9255267 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8565997 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Vihart') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana) over the 15 years from 2007 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.6E-7. 0.0000007639706180152585000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 7.6E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,308,951 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana (Laborers)690790590640840141016301440960790800550450510540
Google searches for 'Vihart' (Rel. search volume)3.416671.666671.416673.0833319.166738.542.528.66671813.833311.1667107.333335.166674.16667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([690,790,590,640,840,1410,1630,1440,960,790,800,550,450,510,540,])
array_2 = np.array([3.41667,1.66667,1.41667,3.08333,19.1667,38.5,42.5,28.6667,18,13.8333,11.1667,10,7.33333,5.16667,4.16667,])
array_1_name = "The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Vihart'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 1416 · Black Variable ID: 8657 · Red Variable ID: 1452
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0