about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,363 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The introduction of GMOs in Iowa corn has inadvertently led to the creation of a new protein that, when consumed, triggers a neurological response causing people to exclaim, "I can't even." This unexpected side effect is both perplexing and mildly entertaining, prompting individuals to question their own capacity to odd incoordination. It's a-maize-ing how this genetically modified produce has kernel of truth to its unintended influence on human expression!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cyber folk scene where a farmer in a cornfield in Iowa plants genetically modified corn seeds, surrounded by vibrant green stalks and a bright blue sky. In contrast, depict a group of individuals sitting in front of computer screens, surrounded by technology and furrowing their brows in frustration as they search "i cant even" on Google. Create a composition that contrasts the tranquil agricultural setting with the frenetic digital world, highlighting the intersection of nature and technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Cybernetic art Futuristic Cyber folk 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cornfield in Iowa, a farmer uses genetically modified corn seeds to plant his crops. At the same time, a group of people sit in front of their computers, furrowing their brows as they search "i cant even" on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In a cornfield in Iowa, a farmer uses genetically modified corn seeds to plant his crops. At the same time, a group of people sit in front of their computers, furrowing their brows as they search "i cant even" on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cyber folk scene where a farmer in a cornfield in Iowa plants genetically modified corn seeds, surrounded by vibrant green stalks and a bright blue sky. In contrast, depict a group of individuals sitting in front of computer screens, surrounded by technology and furrowing their brows in frustration as they search "i cant even" on Google. Create a composition that contrasts the tranquil agricultural setting with the frenetic digital world, highlighting the intersection of nature and technology.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Iowa caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Millennial Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the inherent link between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023 was observed. The implications of this study bring a whimsical and unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. As memes and agriculture intersect in an unprecedented manner, this research illuminates a lighthearted yet thought-provoking connection that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. The findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional state of individuals is indirectly influenced by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. This paper aims to inspire further exploration of unconventional connections and serves as a gentle reminder that even scholarly research can hold a touch of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the inherent link between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023 was observed. The implications of this study bring a whimsical and unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. As memes and agriculture intersect in an unprecedented manner, this research illuminates a lighthearted yet thought-provoking connection that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. The findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional state of individuals is indirectly influenced by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. This paper aims to inspire further exploration of unconventional connections and serves as a gentle reminder that even scholarly research can hold a touch of whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a staple of agricultural discourse in recent years. Critics and proponents have engaged in heated discussions on the virtues and pitfalls of GMO use in crop production. Amidst the fervent debates, an unexpected intersection has emerged, intertwining the fields of agriculture and meme culture. The seemingly disparate realms of GMO corn in the heartland of Iowa and the cyber landscape of Google searches for "i cant even" have converged in a peculiar, if not whimsical, correlation.

The aim of this research is not to delve into the technical minutiae of genetic modification or the intricacies of internet meme culture, but rather to explore the peculiar association between these two seemingly unrelated entities. On the surface, one may be inclined to dismiss any potential connection as mere coincidence or a quirk of statistical analysis. However, as scholars, it is our duty to delve beyond the surface and unravel the unexpected intricacies that sometimes permeate seemingly unrelated domains.

We embarked on this exploration with a blend of curiosity and skepticism, cognizant of the need to maintain scholarly rigor while navigating the uncharted terrain of this peculiar convergence. Our journey led us through the cornfields of Iowa, where the towering stalks of genetically modified maize stand testament to human ingenuity and scientific advancement. Simultaneously, we ventured into the digital realm, where keystrokes and algorithms generate the whimsical yet profound utterance of "i cant even." Little did we anticipate that these seemingly distant terrains would intertwine in a manner that elicits both amusement and contemplation.

As we weave through the fabric of this investigation, we bring to light a correlation that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and psychological research. Our findings compel us to question whether there exists a subtle, indirect influence of agricultural practices on the emotional state of individuals. That "i cant even," whispered through the virtual ethers, might just be the unwitting echo of the cornfields, resonating through the inconspicuous pathways of human cognition.

The implications of our study evoke an understated whimsy, a gentle nudge at the boundary of conventional scholarly discourse. This lighthearted yet thought-provoking revelation challenges the staunch sobriety often associated with academic inquiry. After all, in the tapestry of knowledge, there exist threads of whimsy and unexpected correlations waiting to be unraveled. As we unravel the connection between GMO corn and the refrain of "i cant even," we invite others to delve into unconventional associations and unearth the unexpected in their scholarly pursuits.

In the pages that follow, we beckon readers to accompany us on this serendipitous voyage, embracing both the rigors of scholarly investigation and the transient spark of amusement. As we navigate through the intricate interplay of agriculture and internet culture, we remind ourselves that even in the most unlikely of correlations, there exists the potential for scholarly insight and, perhaps, a touch of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the inherent link between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023 was observed. The implications of this study bring a whimsical and unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. As memes and agriculture intersect in an unprecedented manner, this research illuminates a lighthearted yet thought-provoking connection that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. The findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional state of individuals is indirectly influenced by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. This paper aims to inspire further exploration of unconventional connections and serves as a gentle reminder that even scholarly research can hold a touch of whimsy.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a staple of agricultural discourse in recent years. Critics and proponents have engaged in heated discussions on the virtues and pitfalls of GMO use in crop production. Amidst the fervent debates, an unexpected intersection has emerged, intertwining the fields of agriculture and meme culture. The seemingly disparate realms of GMO corn in the heartland of Iowa and the cyber landscape of Google searches for "i cant even" have converged in a peculiar, if not whimsical, correlation.
The aim of this research is not to delve into the technical minutiae of genetic modification or the intricacies of internet meme culture, but rather to explore the peculiar association between these two seemingly unrelated entities. On the surface, one may be inclined to dismiss any potential connection as mere coincidence or a quirk of statistical analysis. However, as scholars, it is our duty to delve beyond the surface and unravel the unexpected intricacies that sometimes permeate seemingly unrelated domains.
We embarked on this exploration with a blend of curiosity and skepticism, cognizant of the need to maintain scholarly rigor while navigating the uncharted terrain of this peculiar convergence. Our journey led us through the cornfields of Iowa, where the towering stalks of genetically modified maize stand testament to human ingenuity and scientific advancement. Simultaneously, we ventured into the digital realm, where keystrokes and algorithms generate the whimsical yet profound utterance of "i cant even." Little did we anticipate that these seemingly distant terrains would intertwine in a manner that elicits both amusement and contemplation.
As we weave through the fabric of this investigation, we bring to light a correlation that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and psychological research. Our findings compel us to question whether there exists a subtle, indirect influence of agricultural practices on the emotional state of individuals. That "i cant even," whispered through the virtual ethers, might just be the unwitting echo of the cornfields, resonating through the inconspicuous pathways of human cognition.
The implications of our study evoke an understated whimsy, a gentle nudge at the boundary of conventional scholarly discourse. This lighthearted yet thought-provoking revelation challenges the staunch sobriety often associated with academic inquiry. After all, in the tapestry of knowledge, there exist threads of whimsy and unexpected correlations waiting to be unraveled. As we unravel the connection between GMO corn and the refrain of "i cant even," we invite others to delve into unconventional associations and unearth the unexpected in their scholarly pursuits.
In the pages that follow, we beckon readers to accompany us on this serendipitous voyage, embracing both the rigors of scholarly investigation and the transient spark of amusement. As we navigate through the intricate interplay of agriculture and internet culture, we remind ourselves that even in the most unlikely of correlations, there exists the potential for scholarly insight and, perhaps, a touch of whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between GMO use in corn production and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even" has garnered attention across various academic disciplines. Smith (2016) explored the impact of agricultural practices on digital behavior, emphasizing the need to investigate unconventional connections that may influence human responses.

Further studies by Doe (2018) and Jones (2020) delved into the psychological underpinnings of internet memes and their potential association with environmental factors. These works laid the groundwork for probing into the unexpected intersection between agricultural practices and digital expressions of exasperation.

In "The GMO Debate: Controversies and Challenges" (Brown, 2019), the author provides a comprehensive overview of the contentious discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. While the book mainly focuses on the economic and environmental aspects of GMOs, it hints at the possibilities of unforeseen convergences, subtly nudging the reader to ponder the potential quirks of GMO interactions beyond traditional spheres of analysis.

Conversely, "The Art of Memetics: Understanding and Creating Internet Memes" (Gray, 2021) offers an insightful glimpse into the realm of internet meme culture. While not directly connected to agricultural practices, the book alludes to the intricate interplay of digital trends with broader societal influences, setting the stage for the unforeseen alliance between genetically modified corn and digital expressions of resignation.

Moreover, fictional works such as "Corn and Corn-idence: A Tale of Agricultural Anomalies" (Fictional, 2022) and "Meme-ories of Maize: A Digital Harvest" (Fictional, 2023) provide whimsical narratives that, while not grounded in empirical research, captivate the imagination with their inventive portrayals of the potential entanglements between agricultural landscapes and digital expressions.

Beyond the realms of traditional academia, our exploration extended to unconventional sources, including excerpts from whimsical literature, anonymous social media musings, and even the chance perusal of sandwich orders and CVS receipts. While the latter may appear ludicrous at first glance, we approached this investigation with a mindful levity, recognizing that every source, no matter how peculiar, contributes to the vibrant tapestry of scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the inherent link between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023 was observed. The implications of this study bring a whimsical and unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. As memes and agriculture intersect in an unprecedented manner, this research illuminates a lighthearted yet thought-provoking connection that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. The findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional state of individuals is indirectly influenced by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. This paper aims to inspire further exploration of unconventional connections and serves as a gentle reminder that even scholarly research can hold a touch of whimsy.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a staple of agricultural discourse in recent years. Critics and proponents have engaged in heated discussions on the virtues and pitfalls of GMO use in crop production. Amidst the fervent debates, an unexpected intersection has emerged, intertwining the fields of agriculture and meme culture. The seemingly disparate realms of GMO corn in the heartland of Iowa and the cyber landscape of Google searches for "i cant even" have converged in a peculiar, if not whimsical, correlation.
The aim of this research is not to delve into the technical minutiae of genetic modification or the intricacies of internet meme culture, but rather to explore the peculiar association between these two seemingly unrelated entities. On the surface, one may be inclined to dismiss any potential connection as mere coincidence or a quirk of statistical analysis. However, as scholars, it is our duty to delve beyond the surface and unravel the unexpected intricacies that sometimes permeate seemingly unrelated domains.
We embarked on this exploration with a blend of curiosity and skepticism, cognizant of the need to maintain scholarly rigor while navigating the uncharted terrain of this peculiar convergence. Our journey led us through the cornfields of Iowa, where the towering stalks of genetically modified maize stand testament to human ingenuity and scientific advancement. Simultaneously, we ventured into the digital realm, where keystrokes and algorithms generate the whimsical yet profound utterance of "i cant even." Little did we anticipate that these seemingly distant terrains would intertwine in a manner that elicits both amusement and contemplation.
As we weave through the fabric of this investigation, we bring to light a correlation that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and psychological research. Our findings compel us to question whether there exists a subtle, indirect influence of agricultural practices on the emotional state of individuals. That "i cant even," whispered through the virtual ethers, might just be the unwitting echo of the cornfields, resonating through the inconspicuous pathways of human cognition.
The implications of our study evoke an understated whimsy, a gentle nudge at the boundary of conventional scholarly discourse. This lighthearted yet thought-provoking revelation challenges the staunch sobriety often associated with academic inquiry. After all, in the tapestry of knowledge, there exist threads of whimsy and unexpected correlations waiting to be unraveled. As we unravel the connection between GMO corn and the refrain of "i cant even," we invite others to delve into unconventional associations and unearth the unexpected in their scholarly pursuits.
In the pages that follow, we beckon readers to accompany us on this serendipitous voyage, embracing both the rigors of scholarly investigation and the transient spark of amusement. As we navigate through the intricate interplay of agriculture and internet culture, we remind ourselves that even in the most unlikely of correlations, there exists the potential for scholarly insight and, perhaps, a touch of whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to uncover the enigmatic nexus between GMO cultivation in Iowa's cornfields and the prevalence of the phrase "i cant even" in Google searches, this study utilized a multifaceted approach integrating agricultural and digital datasets. Our research team embarked on a daring expedition through the labyrinthine landscapes of the internet and the agrarian heartland, guided by the spirit of scholarly inquiry and a hint of whimsy.

First, we gathered granular data on GMO usage in corn production from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) spanning the years 2004 to 2023, constructing a comprehensive timeline of genetic modification practices in Iowa. This meticulous data collection process involved sifting through a veritable cornucopia of reports, databases, and proclamations from the agrarian archives. We relished this task with the zeal of intrepid explorers unearthing ancient relics, uncovering the tantalizing secrets of GMO adoption and proliferation in the cornfields of Iowa.

On the other front, we navigated the boundless expanse of Google Trends, extracting digital footprints that bore the reverberations of the phrase "i cant even." Hours were spent deciphering the ebb and flow of this peculiar phrase in the digital domain, alongside the ceaseless undulation of internet culture. We mused upon the capricious nature of viral phenomena, recognizing that our search for "i cant even" may have led us down an unpredictable path, akin to chasing elusive fireflies in the twilight.

Once our troves of data had been amassed, we engaged in a nuanced dance with statistics, employing rigorous quantitative analyses to orchestrate the serendipitous rendezvous between GMO usage and the "i cant even" phenomenon. The bountiful harvest of mathematical models and statistical tests were cultivated with the utmost care, ensuring that the amalgamation of agricultural and digital data bore the fruits of scholarly insight. Moreover, we prudently considered the potential confounders and alternative explanations, sheltering our results from the tempestuous winds of spurious correlations and causation fallacies.

With this eclectic blend of data wizardry and whimsical pondering, we bore witness to a correlation coefficient of 0.9138237, accompanied by a significance level of p < 0.01, entwining the fortunes of GMO-infused corn and the chorus of "i cant even" in a manner that beguiles and intrigues. This statistical revelation, akin to unearthing a hidden treasure map in the most unforeseen of places, heightens the aura of whimsy that permeates this scholarly escapade.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9138237, r-squared of 0.8350737, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the inherent link between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023 was observed. The implications of this study bring a whimsical and unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. As memes and agriculture intersect in an unprecedented manner, this research illuminates a lighthearted yet thought-provoking connection that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. The findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional state of individuals is indirectly influenced by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. This paper aims to inspire further exploration of unconventional connections and serves as a gentle reminder that even scholarly research can hold a touch of whimsy.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a staple of agricultural discourse in recent years. Critics and proponents have engaged in heated discussions on the virtues and pitfalls of GMO use in crop production. Amidst the fervent debates, an unexpected intersection has emerged, intertwining the fields of agriculture and meme culture. The seemingly disparate realms of GMO corn in the heartland of Iowa and the cyber landscape of Google searches for "i cant even" have converged in a peculiar, if not whimsical, correlation.
The aim of this research is not to delve into the technical minutiae of genetic modification or the intricacies of internet meme culture, but rather to explore the peculiar association between these two seemingly unrelated entities. On the surface, one may be inclined to dismiss any potential connection as mere coincidence or a quirk of statistical analysis. However, as scholars, it is our duty to delve beyond the surface and unravel the unexpected intricacies that sometimes permeate seemingly unrelated domains.
We embarked on this exploration with a blend of curiosity and skepticism, cognizant of the need to maintain scholarly rigor while navigating the uncharted terrain of this peculiar convergence. Our journey led us through the cornfields of Iowa, where the towering stalks of genetically modified maize stand testament to human ingenuity and scientific advancement. Simultaneously, we ventured into the digital realm, where keystrokes and algorithms generate the whimsical yet profound utterance of "i cant even." Little did we anticipate that these seemingly distant terrains would intertwine in a manner that elicits both amusement and contemplation.
As we weave through the fabric of this investigation, we bring to light a correlation that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and psychological research. Our findings compel us to question whether there exists a subtle, indirect influence of agricultural practices on the emotional state of individuals. That "i cant even," whispered through the virtual ethers, might just be the unwitting echo of the cornfields, resonating through the inconspicuous pathways of human cognition.
The implications of our study evoke an understated whimsy, a gentle nudge at the boundary of conventional scholarly discourse. This lighthearted yet thought-provoking revelation challenges the staunch sobriety often associated with academic inquiry. After all, in the tapestry of knowledge, there exist threads of whimsy and unexpected correlations waiting to be unraveled. As we unravel the connection between GMO corn and the refrain of "i cant even," we invite others to delve into unconventional associations and unearth the unexpected in their scholarly pursuits.
In the pages that follow, we beckon readers to accompany us on this serendipitous voyage, embracing both the rigors of scholarly investigation and the transient spark of amusement. As we navigate through the intricate interplay of agriculture and internet culture, we remind ourselves that even in the most unlikely of correlations, there exists the potential for scholarly insight and, perhaps, a touch of whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends revealed a notable correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." From the time period spanning 2004 to 2023, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 was determined, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.8350737 suggests that approximately 83.5% of the variability in "i cant even" searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production. Notably, the p-value obtained was less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.

Figure 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the robust association between GMO use in Iowa cornfields and the frequency of "i cant even" searches. The data points form a distinct upward trend, reflecting the concordance between the variables over the analyzed time period. It is intriguing to witness the convergence of agricultural practices and online expressions culminating in a compelling correlation that challenges traditional scholarly boundaries.

The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of conventional agricultural and psychological research, resonating with a subtle yet undeniable curiosity. While the statistical association between GMO corn and "i cant even" searches may seem whimsical at first glance, its implications provoke contemplation regarding the potential indirect influence of agricultural practices on human emotions. This unexpected correlation hints at the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena, calling for further exploration of the uncharted intersections between agriculture and cyber culture.

This surprising conjunction of GMO use in cornfields and Google searches for "i cant even" offers a gentle reminder of the inherent unpredictability and humor that can be found within scholarly pursuits. It illustrates the potential for scholarly inquiry to uncover unconventional connections and illuminate unsuspected correlations. As we probe into the unexpected channels of correlation, we encourage fellow scholars to embrace the lighthearted enchantment that occasionally punctuates the rigor of academic investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the inherent link between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023 was observed. The implications of this study bring a whimsical and unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. As memes and agriculture intersect in an unprecedented manner, this research illuminates a lighthearted yet thought-provoking connection that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. The findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional state of individuals is indirectly influenced by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. This paper aims to inspire further exploration of unconventional connections and serves as a gentle reminder that even scholarly research can hold a touch of whimsy.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between GMO use in corn production and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even" has garnered attention across various academic disciplines. Smith (2016) explored the impact of agricultural practices on digital behavior, emphasizing the need to investigate unconventional connections that may influence human responses.
Further studies by Doe (2018) and Jones (2020) delved into the psychological underpinnings of internet memes and their potential association with environmental factors. These works laid the groundwork for probing into the unexpected intersection between agricultural practices and digital expressions of exasperation.
In "The GMO Debate: Controversies and Challenges" (Brown, 2019), the author provides a comprehensive overview of the contentious discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. While the book mainly focuses on the economic and environmental aspects of GMOs, it hints at the possibilities of unforeseen convergences, subtly nudging the reader to ponder the potential quirks of GMO interactions beyond traditional spheres of analysis.
Conversely, "The Art of Memetics: Understanding and Creating Internet Memes" (Gray, 2021) offers an insightful glimpse into the realm of internet meme culture. While not directly connected to agricultural practices, the book alludes to the intricate interplay of digital trends with broader societal influences, setting the stage for the unforeseen alliance between genetically modified corn and digital expressions of resignation.
Moreover, fictional works such as "Corn and Corn-idence: A Tale of Agricultural Anomalies" (Fictional, 2022) and "Meme-ories of Maize: A Digital Harvest" (Fictional, 2023) provide whimsical narratives that, while not grounded in empirical research, captivate the imagination with their inventive portrayals of the potential entanglements between agricultural landscapes and digital expressions.
Beyond the realms of traditional academia, our exploration extended to unconventional sources, including excerpts from whimsical literature, anonymous social media musings, and even the chance perusal of sandwich orders and CVS receipts. While the latter may appear ludicrous at first glance, we approached this investigation with a mindful levity, recognizing that every source, no matter how peculiar, contributes to the vibrant tapestry of scholarly inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends revealed a notable correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." From the time period spanning 2004 to 2023, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 was determined, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.8350737 suggests that approximately 83.5% of the variability in "i cant even" searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production. Notably, the p-value obtained was less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
Figure 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the robust association between GMO use in Iowa cornfields and the frequency of "i cant even" searches. The data points form a distinct upward trend, reflecting the concordance between the variables over the analyzed time period. It is intriguing to witness the convergence of agricultural practices and online expressions culminating in a compelling correlation that challenges traditional scholarly boundaries.
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of conventional agricultural and psychological research, resonating with a subtle yet undeniable curiosity. While the statistical association between GMO corn and "i cant even" searches may seem whimsical at first glance, its implications provoke contemplation regarding the potential indirect influence of agricultural practices on human emotions. This unexpected correlation hints at the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena, calling for further exploration of the uncharted intersections between agriculture and cyber culture.
This surprising conjunction of GMO use in cornfields and Google searches for "i cant even" offers a gentle reminder of the inherent unpredictability and humor that can be found within scholarly pursuits. It illustrates the potential for scholarly inquiry to uncover unconventional connections and illuminate unsuspected correlations. As we probe into the unexpected channels of correlation, we encourage fellow scholars to embrace the lighthearted enchantment that occasionally punctuates the rigor of academic investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study validate and extend the prior research that has surfaced in the scholarly discourse, providing empirical support for the unexpected connection between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for "i cant even." The apparent correlation coefficient of 0.9138237, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of this relationship. The literature review presented intriguing tidbits - let's not underestimate the potential implications hidden within whimsical literature! While initially whimsical, this offhand research from fictional works seems to have an uncanny resonance with our empirical findings. Moreover, even sandwich orders and CVS receipts, when examined with mindful levity, may subtly contribute to the colorful tapestry of scholarly investigation. Our results not only echo the subtle nudges from the literature review but also emphasize the potential unforeseen alliances and complex interactions between agricultural practices and digital expressions.

Our exploration has uncovered a vista into the intertwined nature of seemingly disparate phenomena, challenging traditional scholarly boundaries and reminding us of the vibrant tapestry of research inquiry. This unexpected intersection between agriculture and cyber culture raises thought-provoking questions about the indirect influence of agricultural practices on human emotional states. Our findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional landscape of individuals is tangentially shaped by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. The whimsy that punctuates academic research is indeed a reminder of the enchantment and unpredictability that can sometimes be encountered in scholarly pursuits. As we delve deeper into these unexpected channels of correlation, we advocate for embracing the lighthearted allure that occasionally punctuates the rigidity of academic investigation. This paper adds to the mosaic of scholarship by highlighting the potential for unconventional connections and hidden correlations, inviting fellow scholars to recognize the subtle humor and unpredictability that silently thrums beneath the veneer of conventional research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the inherent link between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023 was observed. The implications of this study bring a whimsical and unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. As memes and agriculture intersect in an unprecedented manner, this research illuminates a lighthearted yet thought-provoking connection that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. The findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional state of individuals is indirectly influenced by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. This paper aims to inspire further exploration of unconventional connections and serves as a gentle reminder that even scholarly research can hold a touch of whimsy.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a staple of agricultural discourse in recent years. Critics and proponents have engaged in heated discussions on the virtues and pitfalls of GMO use in crop production. Amidst the fervent debates, an unexpected intersection has emerged, intertwining the fields of agriculture and meme culture. The seemingly disparate realms of GMO corn in the heartland of Iowa and the cyber landscape of Google searches for "i cant even" have converged in a peculiar, if not whimsical, correlation.
The aim of this research is not to delve into the technical minutiae of genetic modification or the intricacies of internet meme culture, but rather to explore the peculiar association between these two seemingly unrelated entities. On the surface, one may be inclined to dismiss any potential connection as mere coincidence or a quirk of statistical analysis. However, as scholars, it is our duty to delve beyond the surface and unravel the unexpected intricacies that sometimes permeate seemingly unrelated domains.
We embarked on this exploration with a blend of curiosity and skepticism, cognizant of the need to maintain scholarly rigor while navigating the uncharted terrain of this peculiar convergence. Our journey led us through the cornfields of Iowa, where the towering stalks of genetically modified maize stand testament to human ingenuity and scientific advancement. Simultaneously, we ventured into the digital realm, where keystrokes and algorithms generate the whimsical yet profound utterance of "i cant even." Little did we anticipate that these seemingly distant terrains would intertwine in a manner that elicits both amusement and contemplation.
As we weave through the fabric of this investigation, we bring to light a correlation that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and psychological research. Our findings compel us to question whether there exists a subtle, indirect influence of agricultural practices on the emotional state of individuals. That "i cant even," whispered through the virtual ethers, might just be the unwitting echo of the cornfields, resonating through the inconspicuous pathways of human cognition.
The implications of our study evoke an understated whimsy, a gentle nudge at the boundary of conventional scholarly discourse. This lighthearted yet thought-provoking revelation challenges the staunch sobriety often associated with academic inquiry. After all, in the tapestry of knowledge, there exist threads of whimsy and unexpected correlations waiting to be unraveled. As we unravel the connection between GMO corn and the refrain of "i cant even," we invite others to delve into unconventional associations and unearth the unexpected in their scholarly pursuits.
In the pages that follow, we beckon readers to accompany us on this serendipitous voyage, embracing both the rigors of scholarly investigation and the transient spark of amusement. As we navigate through the intricate interplay of agriculture and internet culture, we remind ourselves that even in the most unlikely of correlations, there exists the potential for scholarly insight and, perhaps, a touch of whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends revealed a notable correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." From the time period spanning 2004 to 2023, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 was determined, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.8350737 suggests that approximately 83.5% of the variability in "i cant even" searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production. Notably, the p-value obtained was less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
Figure 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the robust association between GMO use in Iowa cornfields and the frequency of "i cant even" searches. The data points form a distinct upward trend, reflecting the concordance between the variables over the analyzed time period. It is intriguing to witness the convergence of agricultural practices and online expressions culminating in a compelling correlation that challenges traditional scholarly boundaries.
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of conventional agricultural and psychological research, resonating with a subtle yet undeniable curiosity. While the statistical association between GMO corn and "i cant even" searches may seem whimsical at first glance, its implications provoke contemplation regarding the potential indirect influence of agricultural practices on human emotions. This unexpected correlation hints at the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena, calling for further exploration of the uncharted intersections between agriculture and cyber culture.
This surprising conjunction of GMO use in cornfields and Google searches for "i cant even" offers a gentle reminder of the inherent unpredictability and humor that can be found within scholarly pursuits. It illustrates the potential for scholarly inquiry to uncover unconventional connections and illuminate unsuspected correlations. As we probe into the unexpected channels of correlation, we encourage fellow scholars to embrace the lighthearted enchantment that occasionally punctuates the rigor of academic investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In concluding our exploration of the fascinating correlation between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even," we are faced with a confluence of whimsy and scholarly inquiry. Our findings, underscored by a significant correlation coefficient and a compelling r-squared value, shed light on the unexpected intersection of agricultural practices and digital expressions. While seemingly light-hearted, this correlation alludes to the potential indirect influence of agricultural activities on human emotions, challenging traditional boundaries of agricultural and psychological research. As we navigate the uncharted terrain of this peculiar convergence, we are reminded that even in the most unexpected correlations, there lies the potential for scholarly insight and, dare we say, a touch of whimsy.

With this in mind, we deliver what may be considered a "corny" yet pertinent reminder that the interplay between GMO corn and "i cant even" searches serves as a gentle nudge at the boundary of conventional scholarly discourse. However, our findings are no mere fluff; they draw attention to the nuanced and often unpredictable relationships that underpin human experiences. The tapestry of research, as it were, is woven with threads of delightfully unexpected correlations waiting to be unraveled.

As such, given the extent of our findings, it is our firm assertion that no further research is needed in this quirky yet compelling area of scholarly pursuit. Sometimes, it is best to let a good joke stand on its own.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Millennial Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Genetic Modification Studies (IAIGMS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Cornfields to Cant Even: The GMO Connection in Iowa with an abstract of This paper explores the inherent link between GMO use in corn production in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for "i cant even." By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, a startling correlation coefficient of 0.9138237 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023 was observed. The implications of this study bring a whimsical and unexpected twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms in agriculture. As memes and agriculture intersect in an unprecedented manner, this research illuminates a lighthearted yet thought-provoking connection that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. The findings hint at the notion that perhaps the emotional state of individuals is indirectly influenced by the agricultural practices in the heartland of the United States. This paper aims to inspire further exploration of unconventional connections and serves as a gentle reminder that even scholarly research can hold a touch of whimsy.

ChatGPT:

GMO, corn production, Iowa, Google searches, "i cant even", USDA, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, significance level, genetically modified organisms, agriculture, memes, emotional state, heartland of the United States, unconventional connections, scholarly research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Iowa genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Iowa

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.9138237 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8350737 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Iowa) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-8. 0.0000000181478243659810200000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.8E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 55,103,024 random variables You don't actually need 55 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Iowa (GMO corn %)811183753576161647283808080838179808281
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([8,11,18,37,53,57,61,61,64,72,83,80,80,80,83,81,79,80,82,81,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 1363 · Black Variable ID: 741 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0