about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,360 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Guatemala's fossil fuel use rose, so did the temperature. This led to an increase in the number of outdoor barbecues and cookouts in the region. As the delicious aroma of sizzling sausages filled the air, it acted as a subconscious catalyst, triggering a ferocious hot dog cravings in the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. This ultimately resulted in the consumption of a record-breaking number of hotdogs as they tapped into their primeval instinct to devour these sizzling delicacies.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that mimics the iconic TIME magazine cover format, placing the scene in the center. In the foreground, capture the reigning champion of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, proudly displaying the winner's sash, with a crowd cheering in the background. The group of people should be gathered around a traditional outdoor grill, highlighted by the glow of the charcoal-fueled fire derived from fossil fuels, where hotdogs are being cooked. The atmosphere should evoke a sense of celebration and camaraderie. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Cute cartoon Futuristic A TIME magazine cover image Data cyber art
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Guatemala, a group of people are gathered around a traditional outdoor grill, cooking hotdogs over a fire fueled by charcoal made from fossil fuels. The reigning champion of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, wearing the winner's sash, is seen enjoying a hotdog while the crowd cheers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Guatemala, a group of people are gathered around a traditional outdoor grill, cooking hotdogs over a fire fueled by charcoal made from fossil fuels. The reigning champion of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, wearing the winner's sash, is seen enjoying a hotdog while the crowd cheers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that mimics the iconic TIME magazine cover format, placing the scene in the center. In the foreground, capture the reigning champion of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, proudly displaying the winner's sash, with a crowd cheering in the background. The group of people should be gathered around a traditional outdoor grill, highlighted by the glow of the charcoal-fueled fire derived from fossil fuels, where hotdogs are being cooked. The atmosphere should evoke a sense of celebration and camaraderie.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Guatemala caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

The Journal of Gastronomical Geology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
What do fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion have in common? It turns out, potentially more than you might expect! In this quirky research paper, we dive into the unconventional realm of competitive eating and environmental data to explore the correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a possible influence of fossil fuel consumption on the hotdog-eating prowess of competitive eaters, shedding light on a connection that defies common assumptions and leaves us with, dare we say, a smokin' hot conclusion. So, buckle up and grab a snack, because this paper is a wild ride through the world of wieners and winding statistical pathways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
What do fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion have in common? It turns out, potentially more than you might expect! In this quirky research paper, we dive into the unconventional realm of competitive eating and environmental data to explore the correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a possible influence of fossil fuel consumption on the hotdog-eating prowess of competitive eaters, shedding light on a connection that defies common assumptions and leaves us with, dare we say, a smokin' hot conclusion. So, buckle up and grab a snack, because this paper is a wild ride through the world of wieners and winding statistical pathways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

There's an age-old saying, "You are what you eat," but what if we told you that what you eat could be influenced by something as unexpected as fossil fuel use in Guatemala? Yes, dear readers, in this wildly captivating research paper, we embark on a journey that explores the unlikely connection between the consumption of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion and the fossil fuel use in Guatemala. If you thought this was going to be your typical run-of-the-mill academic paper, think again! We're about to unravel an enigmatic entanglement that will make even the most seasoned statistician do a double-take.

Now, I know what you're thinking. "How could such disparate variables possibly be connected?" Well, grab some mustard and brace yourselves, because we're about to delve into a statistical rollercoaster that might just knock your statistical socks off. We promise - you'll relish every moment of it.

We aim to prove that science doesn't have to be as dry as a hotdog bun in the Sahara desert. In fact, sometimes it can be as smokin' hot as the grill at a summer cookout. So, get ready to join us on this lighthearted and ketchup-filled romp through unchartered territory where the serious world of empirical evidence meets the not-so-serious practice of hotdog consumption.

With tongues firmly in cheek and data sets at the ready, let's set sail on this voyage of discovery, because as the old adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire" – and we're about to find out just how much sizzle there is in this statistical sausage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
What do fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion have in common? It turns out, potentially more than you might expect! In this quirky research paper, we dive into the unconventional realm of competitive eating and environmental data to explore the correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a possible influence of fossil fuel consumption on the hotdog-eating prowess of competitive eaters, shedding light on a connection that defies common assumptions and leaves us with, dare we say, a smokin' hot conclusion. So, buckle up and grab a snack, because this paper is a wild ride through the world of wieners and winding statistical pathways.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
There's an age-old saying, "You are what you eat," but what if we told you that what you eat could be influenced by something as unexpected as fossil fuel use in Guatemala? Yes, dear readers, in this wildly captivating research paper, we embark on a journey that explores the unlikely connection between the consumption of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion and the fossil fuel use in Guatemala. If you thought this was going to be your typical run-of-the-mill academic paper, think again! We're about to unravel an enigmatic entanglement that will make even the most seasoned statistician do a double-take.
Now, I know what you're thinking. "How could such disparate variables possibly be connected?" Well, grab some mustard and brace yourselves, because we're about to delve into a statistical rollercoaster that might just knock your statistical socks off. We promise - you'll relish every moment of it.
We aim to prove that science doesn't have to be as dry as a hotdog bun in the Sahara desert. In fact, sometimes it can be as smokin' hot as the grill at a summer cookout. So, get ready to join us on this lighthearted and ketchup-filled romp through unchartered territory where the serious world of empirical evidence meets the not-so-serious practice of hotdog consumption.
With tongues firmly in cheek and data sets at the ready, let's set sail on this voyage of discovery, because as the old adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire" – and we're about to find out just how much sizzle there is in this statistical sausage.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion is an area of research that, until now, has received little attention in academic circles. However, the existing literature does offer some insights, albeit not always of the conventional academic sort.

Smith and Doe (2008) present a comprehensive analysis of fossil fuel consumption in Central America, with a focus on the impact of Guatemala's energy policies. While their work does not explicitly address competitive eating, it provides a foundational understanding of the broader context in which our investigation takes place. Meanwhile, Jones (2012) explores the dietary habits of competitive eaters and their physiological impact. Though not specifically focused on hotdog consumption, Jones' work is relevant in understanding the broader landscape of competitive eating.

Turning to non-fiction works that relate to our subject, "Eating Animals" by Jonathan Safran Foer and "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser provide valuable insights into the cultural, environmental, and ethical dimensions of meat consumption. While not directly linked to hotdog eating competitions, their examination of the larger food system informs our investigation. On the fictional side, the novel "The Hundred-Foot Journey" by Richard C. Morais and "Sourdough" by Robin Sloan offer captivating narratives about the world of competitive food consumption, albeit not focused specifically on hotdogs.

Moreover, in the pursuit of academic rigor, the research team delved into the realm of popular culture, with light-hearted investigative viewing of competitive eating-related TV shows such as "Man v. Food" and "The Great Food Truck Race." While not academic in nature, these shows provided a nuanced understanding of the thrill and excitement surrounding competitive eating events.

As we move forward, it becomes increasingly clear that our investigation necessitates a multi-disciplinary approach that bridges the scholarly, literary, and televisual realms. The literature, both serious and light-hearted, offers a rich tapestry from which to draw insights and inspiration for our quest to unravel the curious connection between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and hotdog consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
What do fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion have in common? It turns out, potentially more than you might expect! In this quirky research paper, we dive into the unconventional realm of competitive eating and environmental data to explore the correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a possible influence of fossil fuel consumption on the hotdog-eating prowess of competitive eaters, shedding light on a connection that defies common assumptions and leaves us with, dare we say, a smokin' hot conclusion. So, buckle up and grab a snack, because this paper is a wild ride through the world of wieners and winding statistical pathways.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
There's an age-old saying, "You are what you eat," but what if we told you that what you eat could be influenced by something as unexpected as fossil fuel use in Guatemala? Yes, dear readers, in this wildly captivating research paper, we embark on a journey that explores the unlikely connection between the consumption of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion and the fossil fuel use in Guatemala. If you thought this was going to be your typical run-of-the-mill academic paper, think again! We're about to unravel an enigmatic entanglement that will make even the most seasoned statistician do a double-take.
Now, I know what you're thinking. "How could such disparate variables possibly be connected?" Well, grab some mustard and brace yourselves, because we're about to delve into a statistical rollercoaster that might just knock your statistical socks off. We promise - you'll relish every moment of it.
We aim to prove that science doesn't have to be as dry as a hotdog bun in the Sahara desert. In fact, sometimes it can be as smokin' hot as the grill at a summer cookout. So, get ready to join us on this lighthearted and ketchup-filled romp through unchartered territory where the serious world of empirical evidence meets the not-so-serious practice of hotdog consumption.
With tongues firmly in cheek and data sets at the ready, let's set sail on this voyage of discovery, because as the old adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire" – and we're about to find out just how much sizzle there is in this statistical sausage.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the tantalizing link between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by the illustrious Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, our research team embarked on a data collection odyssey that would make even the most intrepid explorer raise an eyebrow. Our sources were as plentiful and diverse as the toppings on a loaded hotdog, drawing primarily from the Energy Information Administration and our trusty friend, Wikipedia, to assemble a veritable feast of data spanning from 1980 to 2021.

First, we scoured the depths of the internet, armed with an insatiable appetite for knowledge and a meticulously prepared search algorithm to reel in every nugget of information related to fossil fuel use in Guatemala. Our search was as thorough as a competitive eater's pre-competition training routine, leaving no page unturned in our quest for comprehensive energy consumption statistics. We meticulously combed through official reports, academic articles, and legitimate data repositories, ensuring that our data buffet left no room for doubt in the authenticity of our findings.

Next, we turned our attention to the mesmerizing world of competitive eating, where we set our sights on the astronomical hotdog consumption feats of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. With the fervor of a dedicated enthusiast, we meticulously tallied, verified, and cross-referenced the numbers, leaving no condiment unturned in our pursuit of the true magnitude of hotdog consumption. We traversed through an endless sea of tournament records, news articles, and eyewitness accounts to compile a delectable dataset that would make any statistician's mouth water with anticipation.

Once our bountiful datasets were in hand, we unleashed the full might of statistical analysis upon them. We opted for a robust and flavorsome correlation analysis, using the hallowed Pearson correlation coefficient to uncover the potential relationship between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the astronomical consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of competitive eating.

Our trusty statistics toolbox also came equipped with the formidable weapon of significance testing, unleashing the power of the p-value to validate the strength of our tantalizing correlation findings. With a full arsenal of statistical weaponry at our disposal, we were poised to uncover the savory secrets hidden within the data, crafting a concoction so potent it could rival the spiciest of hotdog toppings.

In summary, our data collection and analysis methods were as thorough as a hotdog vendor's scrutiny of their buns, ensuring that our findings would withstand the most rigorous scrutiny and leave all doubt at the door. So, as we embark on this epic journey through the world of wieners and statistical sorcery, buckle up and prepare for a tantalizing ride through a world where the unlikely becomes undeniably intertwined.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9170133, r-squared of 0.8409134, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
What do fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion have in common? It turns out, potentially more than you might expect! In this quirky research paper, we dive into the unconventional realm of competitive eating and environmental data to explore the correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a possible influence of fossil fuel consumption on the hotdog-eating prowess of competitive eaters, shedding light on a connection that defies common assumptions and leaves us with, dare we say, a smokin' hot conclusion. So, buckle up and grab a snack, because this paper is a wild ride through the world of wieners and winding statistical pathways.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
There's an age-old saying, "You are what you eat," but what if we told you that what you eat could be influenced by something as unexpected as fossil fuel use in Guatemala? Yes, dear readers, in this wildly captivating research paper, we embark on a journey that explores the unlikely connection between the consumption of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion and the fossil fuel use in Guatemala. If you thought this was going to be your typical run-of-the-mill academic paper, think again! We're about to unravel an enigmatic entanglement that will make even the most seasoned statistician do a double-take.
Now, I know what you're thinking. "How could such disparate variables possibly be connected?" Well, grab some mustard and brace yourselves, because we're about to delve into a statistical rollercoaster that might just knock your statistical socks off. We promise - you'll relish every moment of it.
We aim to prove that science doesn't have to be as dry as a hotdog bun in the Sahara desert. In fact, sometimes it can be as smokin' hot as the grill at a summer cookout. So, get ready to join us on this lighthearted and ketchup-filled romp through unchartered territory where the serious world of empirical evidence meets the not-so-serious practice of hotdog consumption.
With tongues firmly in cheek and data sets at the ready, let's set sail on this voyage of discovery, because as the old adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire" – and we're about to find out just how much sizzle there is in this statistical sausage.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In a sizzling turn of events, our investigation into the relationship between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by the illustrious Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has uncorked some astonishing findings. Through our data exploration spanning the years 1980 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9170133, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruent variables. As if that wasn't enough to have us jumping for joy like we just downed a dozen hotdogs at a county fair, the r-squared value of 0.8409134 further solidifies the strength of this connection.

Now, for the statistics buffs among us, we simply couldn't contain our excitement when we realized that the p-value for this delightful duo of data was less than 0.01. That's right, folks - the evidence is so significant, it practically leapt off the page and did a victory lap around the lab. Suffice it to say, our findings aren't just a flash in the pan; they're more like a flaming grill at a Fourth of July barbecue!

To drive home the point, we've included a captivating scatterplot as Fig. 1, illustrating the tight-knit relationship between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs devoured by the reigning hotdog-eating champ. If you thought correlations couldn't be visually stimulating, prepare to have your assumptions skewered like a hotdog on a stick!

In conclusion, our results leave us with a tantalizing taste of scientific intrigue, igniting a curiosity that is as enigmatic as the link between two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that when it comes to competitive eating and environmental impact, the relationship is as savory as a perfectly grilled bratwurst. Keep those condiments handy, because this statistical smorgasbord is just getting started!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
What do fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion have in common? It turns out, potentially more than you might expect! In this quirky research paper, we dive into the unconventional realm of competitive eating and environmental data to explore the correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a possible influence of fossil fuel consumption on the hotdog-eating prowess of competitive eaters, shedding light on a connection that defies common assumptions and leaves us with, dare we say, a smokin' hot conclusion. So, buckle up and grab a snack, because this paper is a wild ride through the world of wieners and winding statistical pathways.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion is an area of research that, until now, has received little attention in academic circles. However, the existing literature does offer some insights, albeit not always of the conventional academic sort.
Smith and Doe (2008) present a comprehensive analysis of fossil fuel consumption in Central America, with a focus on the impact of Guatemala's energy policies. While their work does not explicitly address competitive eating, it provides a foundational understanding of the broader context in which our investigation takes place. Meanwhile, Jones (2012) explores the dietary habits of competitive eaters and their physiological impact. Though not specifically focused on hotdog consumption, Jones' work is relevant in understanding the broader landscape of competitive eating.
Turning to non-fiction works that relate to our subject, "Eating Animals" by Jonathan Safran Foer and "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser provide valuable insights into the cultural, environmental, and ethical dimensions of meat consumption. While not directly linked to hotdog eating competitions, their examination of the larger food system informs our investigation. On the fictional side, the novel "The Hundred-Foot Journey" by Richard C. Morais and "Sourdough" by Robin Sloan offer captivating narratives about the world of competitive food consumption, albeit not focused specifically on hotdogs.
Moreover, in the pursuit of academic rigor, the research team delved into the realm of popular culture, with light-hearted investigative viewing of competitive eating-related TV shows such as "Man v. Food" and "The Great Food Truck Race." While not academic in nature, these shows provided a nuanced understanding of the thrill and excitement surrounding competitive eating events.
As we move forward, it becomes increasingly clear that our investigation necessitates a multi-disciplinary approach that bridges the scholarly, literary, and televisual realms. The literature, both serious and light-hearted, offers a rich tapestry from which to draw insights and inspiration for our quest to unravel the curious connection between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and hotdog consumption.

[[RESULTS]]
In a sizzling turn of events, our investigation into the relationship between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by the illustrious Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has uncorked some astonishing findings. Through our data exploration spanning the years 1980 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9170133, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruent variables. As if that wasn't enough to have us jumping for joy like we just downed a dozen hotdogs at a county fair, the r-squared value of 0.8409134 further solidifies the strength of this connection.
Now, for the statistics buffs among us, we simply couldn't contain our excitement when we realized that the p-value for this delightful duo of data was less than 0.01. That's right, folks - the evidence is so significant, it practically leapt off the page and did a victory lap around the lab. Suffice it to say, our findings aren't just a flash in the pan; they're more like a flaming grill at a Fourth of July barbecue!
To drive home the point, we've included a captivating scatterplot as Fig. 1, illustrating the tight-knit relationship between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs devoured by the reigning hotdog-eating champ. If you thought correlations couldn't be visually stimulating, prepare to have your assumptions skewered like a hotdog on a stick!
In conclusion, our results leave us with a tantalizing taste of scientific intrigue, igniting a curiosity that is as enigmatic as the link between two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that when it comes to competitive eating and environmental impact, the relationship is as savory as a perfectly grilled bratwurst. Keep those condiments handy, because this statistical smorgasbord is just getting started!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the most unexpected of turns, our investigation into the correlation between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has thrown up some seriously tantalizing findings. Like a twist in a sitcom plotline, it seems that these seemingly unrelated variables have stirred up quite the culinary storm.

Harking back to the literature review, who would have thought that the fictional narrative in "Sourdough" by Robin Sloan would hold even a smidgen of relevance to our scientific pursuits? Truly, we find ourselves with a richer tapestry of insights, proving that sometimes the most unexpected sources can flavor our understanding.

So, what did our statistical shenanigans reveal? Well, with a correlation coefficient so robust it could almost stand in for the Nathan's contest champion, and an r-squared value as substantial as a fully-loaded chili cheese dog, our results are nothing short of an appetizing spectacle. If we were to quantify the strength of this relationship in hotdogs, we'd say it's akin to a world record-breaking consumption – undeniably impressive and totally jaw-dropping.

But let's not forget the shrewd statistical wordplay of our p-value – less than 0.01, it practically waved a banner proclaiming, "Statistically significant findings, right this way!" It's the kind of statistical showmanship that leaves many other p-values in its bun dust.

While for some, the connection between fossil fuels and hotdogs might seem as outlandish as a potato salad-flavored topping, it appears our findings have stirred up quite the delightful revelation. It seems that like a well-crafted pun, the connection between these factors is both intriguing and oddly satisfying.

In the grand scientific saga of unpredictable connections, it seems this curious correlation has left us with a comedic twist worthy of a primetime sitcom. Who knew that the world of competitive eating and environmental statistics could join forces in such an unexpected, yet undeniably fascinating, union? As we savor the flavor of these findings, it's safe to say that the statistical menu of curiosities just got a whole lot more interesting. And who knows, perhaps this tantalizing tidbit of scientific surprise will inspire a new generation of food and fuel-related explorations. Bon appétit to that!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Guatemala and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
What do fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion have in common? It turns out, potentially more than you might expect! In this quirky research paper, we dive into the unconventional realm of competitive eating and environmental data to explore the correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a possible influence of fossil fuel consumption on the hotdog-eating prowess of competitive eaters, shedding light on a connection that defies common assumptions and leaves us with, dare we say, a smokin' hot conclusion. So, buckle up and grab a snack, because this paper is a wild ride through the world of wieners and winding statistical pathways.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
There's an age-old saying, "You are what you eat," but what if we told you that what you eat could be influenced by something as unexpected as fossil fuel use in Guatemala? Yes, dear readers, in this wildly captivating research paper, we embark on a journey that explores the unlikely connection between the consumption of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion and the fossil fuel use in Guatemala. If you thought this was going to be your typical run-of-the-mill academic paper, think again! We're about to unravel an enigmatic entanglement that will make even the most seasoned statistician do a double-take.
Now, I know what you're thinking. "How could such disparate variables possibly be connected?" Well, grab some mustard and brace yourselves, because we're about to delve into a statistical rollercoaster that might just knock your statistical socks off. We promise - you'll relish every moment of it.
We aim to prove that science doesn't have to be as dry as a hotdog bun in the Sahara desert. In fact, sometimes it can be as smokin' hot as the grill at a summer cookout. So, get ready to join us on this lighthearted and ketchup-filled romp through unchartered territory where the serious world of empirical evidence meets the not-so-serious practice of hotdog consumption.
With tongues firmly in cheek and data sets at the ready, let's set sail on this voyage of discovery, because as the old adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire" – and we're about to find out just how much sizzle there is in this statistical sausage.

[[RESULTS]]
In a sizzling turn of events, our investigation into the relationship between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by the illustrious Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has uncorked some astonishing findings. Through our data exploration spanning the years 1980 to 2021, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9170133, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruent variables. As if that wasn't enough to have us jumping for joy like we just downed a dozen hotdogs at a county fair, the r-squared value of 0.8409134 further solidifies the strength of this connection.
Now, for the statistics buffs among us, we simply couldn't contain our excitement when we realized that the p-value for this delightful duo of data was less than 0.01. That's right, folks - the evidence is so significant, it practically leapt off the page and did a victory lap around the lab. Suffice it to say, our findings aren't just a flash in the pan; they're more like a flaming grill at a Fourth of July barbecue!
To drive home the point, we've included a captivating scatterplot as Fig. 1, illustrating the tight-knit relationship between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs devoured by the reigning hotdog-eating champ. If you thought correlations couldn't be visually stimulating, prepare to have your assumptions skewered like a hotdog on a stick!
In conclusion, our results leave us with a tantalizing taste of scientific intrigue, igniting a curiosity that is as enigmatic as the link between two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that when it comes to competitive eating and environmental impact, the relationship is as savory as a perfectly grilled bratwurst. Keep those condiments handy, because this statistical smorgasbord is just getting started!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In a shocking twist that would make even the most seasoned statisticians do a double-take, our unlikely investigation into the connection between fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has left us with a burning desire for more. The sizzling correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 left us feeling as giddy as a hotdog vendor at a baseball game. It appears that the consumption of hotdogs may indeed be fueled by more than just ketchup and mustard – perhaps a dash of Guatemalan fossil fuel use is the secret ingredient all along!

As much as we'd relish the idea of diving deeper into this tantalizing relationship, it seems that our findings have left us with more questions than answers. Are there hidden variables at play, such as the global demand for processed meat or the impact of competitive eating on greenhouse gas emissions? It's possible we've bitten off more than we can chew with this research, but one thing's for sure: the link between fossil fuel use and competitive eating is as real as a perfectly charred hotdog on a summer grill.

So, with a heavy heart and a growling stomach, we must assert that further research in this area may not be the best use of scientific resources. While the connection between these variables may be as undeniable as the urge to reach for that last hotdog at a barbecue, it seems that for now, the mystery of their intertwined fate shall remain unsolved. But hey, at least we've sparked some fiery discussions and added a sprinkle of spice to the world of empirical inquiry. So, until next time, let's keep our buns to the ground and continue seeking out other statistical sausages to skewer! Cheers to the unlikely and the udderly absurd – this has been one wild ride on the playground of the peculiar.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Gastronomical Geology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Association for Culinary and Environmental Sciences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Feats of a Wiener: The Unlikely Connection between Fossil Fuel Use in Guatemala and the Hotdogs Consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion with an abstract of What do fossil fuel use in Guatemala and the number of hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion have in common? It turns out, potentially more than you might expect! In this quirky research paper, we dive into the unconventional realm of competitive eating and environmental data to explore the correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9170133 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a possible influence of fossil fuel consumption on the hotdog-eating prowess of competitive eaters, shedding light on a connection that defies common assumptions and leaves us with, dare we say, a smokin' hot conclusion. So, buckle up and grab a snack, because this paper is a wild ride through the world of wieners and winding statistical pathways.

ChatGPT:

fossil fuel consumption, Guatemala, hotdog consumption, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, competitive eating, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, Energy Information Administration, Wikipedia, environmental data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Fossil fuel use in Guatemala
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Guatemala in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Guatemala

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.9170133 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8409134 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Guatemala) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-17. 0.0000000000000000146742238779
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.5E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 68,146,704,610,800,040 random variables You don't actually need 68 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Fossil fuel use in Guatemala (Billion kWh)1.3031.241.0690.7580.9230.9150.10.250.2920.2110.1720.3250.6480.6550.711.1231.0021.0452.0392.122.74482.864183.390583.371782.578423.9733.6884.3113.6544.3283.02213.072863.074743.226083.420664.614464.705643.63785.3645.698544.007974.89082
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)9.5111110.59.511.7515.513.51015.51621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.75665968546268696162707274717576




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.303,1.24,1.069,0.758,0.923,0.915,0.1,0.25,0.292,0.211,0.172,0.325,0.648,0.655,0.71,1.123,1.002,1.045,2.039,2.12,2.7448,2.86418,3.39058,3.37178,2.57842,3.973,3.688,4.311,3.654,4.328,3.0221,3.07286,3.07474,3.22608,3.42066,4.61446,4.70564,3.6378,5.364,5.69854,4.00797,4.89082,])
array_2 = np.array([9.5,11,11,10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Guatemala"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1360 · Black Variable ID: 23706 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0