about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,354 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Cincinnati and the second variable is Arson in United States.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The cleaner air in Cincinnati meant that there was less soot to go around, leaving would-be arsonists feeling like they just couldn't make a clean getaway.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing Cincinnati's city skyline engulfed in thick smoke from a burning building. Portray the haze obscuring the skyline and residents struggling to cover their mouths and noses due to the poor air quality. Depict firefighters bravely battling the flames amidst the smoky backdrop, while nearby residents seek safety. Ensure the visual realistically conveys the intensity of the situation and the urgency of the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Surrealism Realistic Concept art Surrealism
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Cincinnati, thick smoke billows from a burning building, veiling the city skyline in a haze as people cover their mouths and noses, struggling to breathe in the poor air quality. Firefighters battle the flames while nearby residents seek safety from the effects of both the fire and the polluted air.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Cincinnati, thick smoke billows from a burning building, veiling the city skyline in a haze as people cover their mouths and noses, struggling to breathe in the poor air quality. Firefighters battle the flames while nearby residents seek safety from the effects of both the fire and the polluted air. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing Cincinnati's city skyline engulfed in thick smoke from a burning building. Portray the haze obscuring the skyline and residents struggling to cover their mouths and noses due to the poor air quality. Depict firefighters bravely battling the flames amidst the smoky backdrop, while nearby residents seek safety. Ensure the visual realistically conveys the intensity of the situation and the urgency of the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Cincinnati caused Arson in United States to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati

Journal of Environmental Combustion Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we applied statistical analysis to investigate this pressing issue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022. The results not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also fan the flames of further research in this unexplored area. Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one can't help but ponder the irony of arson cases being "ignited" by the air quality in Cincinnati. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we applied statistical analysis to investigate this pressing issue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022. The results not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also fan the flames of further research in this unexplored area. Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one can't help but ponder the irony of arson cases being "ignited" by the air quality in Cincinnati. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between environmental factors and criminal behavior has long been a subject of interest in the field of criminology. While traditional studies have often focused on socioeconomic conditions, the influence of air quality on criminal activity has received less attention. In particular, the connection between poor air quality and arson presents an intriguing avenue for exploration. The juxtaposition of literal "hot air" and figurative "hot air" - that is, the combustion of materials and the expression of deceit or nonsense - adds a layer of complexity to this investigation. It seems that the atmosphere in Cincinnati is not only inducing smog but also potentially fanning the flames of criminal activity.

In this study, we aim to delve into the relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. The city's reputation as an epicenter of this conundrum is not lost on us, much like a smokescreen that masks the deeper complexities of this issue. The city's nickname "The Queen City" serves as a fitting reminder that even in a regal place, the air quality may not always be up to royal standards. Our examination, however, extends beyond mere amusement at puns and amusing associations. The data-driven analysis that follows is intended to illuminate the gravity of this matter and bring it out of the shadows of speculative humor.

As the digital age spawns an ever-burgeoning wealth of data, the interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior emerges as a compelling area of study. The seemingly straightforward act of arson is indeed a multifaceted phenomenon, and our exploration into the potential influence of air quality introduces a breath of fresh air to the discourse. The sparks of curiosity that ignite our investigation are fanned by the significance of our findings, as we uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over a span of nearly four decades. The thermal metaphor, of course, is not lost on us as we observe the distinct possibilities of environmental impact on incendiary acts.

This paper is structured as follows: first, we will review the relevant literature on the connections between environmental factors and criminal behavior, paying heed to the nuanced nature of these interactions. Then, we will delve into the methodology employed in our study, outlining the data sources and analytical approaches woven into our investigative tapestry. Subsequently, we will present and discuss our findings, exploring the implications of the observed correlation. Finally, we will conclude with reflections on the implications of our work, igniting the flames of future inquiries into this enigmatic arson-air quality nexus.

In conclusion, this endeavour endeavors to blow away the smoke surrounding the potential impact of air quality on arson, shedding light on an oft-overlooked dimension of environmental criminology. The flickering connection between smog and arson is not merely a matter of convenience, but a deeper conundrum enveloped in a hazy cloud of curiosity, waiting to be illuminated by the torch of empirical investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we applied statistical analysis to investigate this pressing issue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022. The results not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also fan the flames of further research in this unexplored area. Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one can't help but ponder the irony of arson cases being "ignited" by the air quality in Cincinnati. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and criminal behavior has long been a subject of interest in the field of criminology. While traditional studies have often focused on socioeconomic conditions, the influence of air quality on criminal activity has received less attention. In particular, the connection between poor air quality and arson presents an intriguing avenue for exploration. The juxtaposition of literal "hot air" and figurative "hot air" - that is, the combustion of materials and the expression of deceit or nonsense - adds a layer of complexity to this investigation. It seems that the atmosphere in Cincinnati is not only inducing smog but also potentially fanning the flames of criminal activity.
In this study, we aim to delve into the relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. The city's reputation as an epicenter of this conundrum is not lost on us, much like a smokescreen that masks the deeper complexities of this issue. The city's nickname "The Queen City" serves as a fitting reminder that even in a regal place, the air quality may not always be up to royal standards. Our examination, however, extends beyond mere amusement at puns and amusing associations. The data-driven analysis that follows is intended to illuminate the gravity of this matter and bring it out of the shadows of speculative humor.
As the digital age spawns an ever-burgeoning wealth of data, the interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior emerges as a compelling area of study. The seemingly straightforward act of arson is indeed a multifaceted phenomenon, and our exploration into the potential influence of air quality introduces a breath of fresh air to the discourse. The sparks of curiosity that ignite our investigation are fanned by the significance of our findings, as we uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over a span of nearly four decades. The thermal metaphor, of course, is not lost on us as we observe the distinct possibilities of environmental impact on incendiary acts.
This paper is structured as follows: first, we will review the relevant literature on the connections between environmental factors and criminal behavior, paying heed to the nuanced nature of these interactions. Then, we will delve into the methodology employed in our study, outlining the data sources and analytical approaches woven into our investigative tapestry. Subsequently, we will present and discuss our findings, exploring the implications of the observed correlation. Finally, we will conclude with reflections on the implications of our work, igniting the flames of future inquiries into this enigmatic arson-air quality nexus.
In conclusion, this endeavour endeavors to blow away the smoke surrounding the potential impact of air quality on arson, shedding light on an oft-overlooked dimension of environmental criminology. The flickering connection between smog and arson is not merely a matter of convenience, but a deeper conundrum enveloped in a hazy cloud of curiosity, waiting to be illuminated by the torch of empirical investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors surveyed the existing literature on the connection between environmental factors and criminal behavior, focusing on the specific relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States.

Smith and Doe (2010) examined the impact of air pollution on human health and well-being, highlighting the potential implications for societal dynamics. Their work underscored the far-reaching effects of environmental conditions on various aspects of human life, framing the present investigation within a broader context of environmental criminology.

Jones et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of arson patterns across major metropolitan areas, revealing intriguing spatial and temporal trends. While their study did not explicitly address the influence of air quality, the authors' findings laid the groundwork for considering the potential interplay between atmospheric conditions and arson activity.

In "Book," the authors find that air pollution has been linked to respiratory ailments, cognitive impairments, and even cardiovascular diseases, prompting reflection on the more hidden impacts of poor air quality. The implications for mental well-being, and by extension, behavioral patterns, invite speculation on the potential indirect influence of air quality on criminal activities such as arson.

Turning to broader cultural and literary perspectives, "The Air We Breathe" by Andrea Barrett and "The Smoke Jumper" by Nicholas Evans offer fictional explorations of human experiences in environments marked by air quality concerns. While these narratives may not offer direct empirical evidence, they serve as artistic reflections that invite a more holistic consideration of the interweaving of environmental conditions and human behavior.

Venturing into less conventional sources, the authors acknowledge engaging in an extensive review of the backs of various household products, including but not limited to shampoo bottles, to gather diverse perspectives on air quality and its potential impact on human behavior. While these sources may not align with traditional academic discourses, they offer unique insights and aromatic amusement to the investigation at hand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we applied statistical analysis to investigate this pressing issue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022. The results not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also fan the flames of further research in this unexplored area. Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one can't help but ponder the irony of arson cases being "ignited" by the air quality in Cincinnati. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and criminal behavior has long been a subject of interest in the field of criminology. While traditional studies have often focused on socioeconomic conditions, the influence of air quality on criminal activity has received less attention. In particular, the connection between poor air quality and arson presents an intriguing avenue for exploration. The juxtaposition of literal "hot air" and figurative "hot air" - that is, the combustion of materials and the expression of deceit or nonsense - adds a layer of complexity to this investigation. It seems that the atmosphere in Cincinnati is not only inducing smog but also potentially fanning the flames of criminal activity.
In this study, we aim to delve into the relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. The city's reputation as an epicenter of this conundrum is not lost on us, much like a smokescreen that masks the deeper complexities of this issue. The city's nickname "The Queen City" serves as a fitting reminder that even in a regal place, the air quality may not always be up to royal standards. Our examination, however, extends beyond mere amusement at puns and amusing associations. The data-driven analysis that follows is intended to illuminate the gravity of this matter and bring it out of the shadows of speculative humor.
As the digital age spawns an ever-burgeoning wealth of data, the interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior emerges as a compelling area of study. The seemingly straightforward act of arson is indeed a multifaceted phenomenon, and our exploration into the potential influence of air quality introduces a breath of fresh air to the discourse. The sparks of curiosity that ignite our investigation are fanned by the significance of our findings, as we uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over a span of nearly four decades. The thermal metaphor, of course, is not lost on us as we observe the distinct possibilities of environmental impact on incendiary acts.
This paper is structured as follows: first, we will review the relevant literature on the connections between environmental factors and criminal behavior, paying heed to the nuanced nature of these interactions. Then, we will delve into the methodology employed in our study, outlining the data sources and analytical approaches woven into our investigative tapestry. Subsequently, we will present and discuss our findings, exploring the implications of the observed correlation. Finally, we will conclude with reflections on the implications of our work, igniting the flames of future inquiries into this enigmatic arson-air quality nexus.
In conclusion, this endeavour endeavors to blow away the smoke surrounding the potential impact of air quality on arson, shedding light on an oft-overlooked dimension of environmental criminology. The flickering connection between smog and arson is not merely a matter of convenience, but a deeper conundrum enveloped in a hazy cloud of curiosity, waiting to be illuminated by the torch of empirical investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this investigation comprised a multifaceted approach, akin to the intricate web of factors influencing arson patterns. To begin, we meticulously gathered data from various sources, primarily drawing upon information from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS). The utilization of these databases allowed us to amass a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 1985 to 2022, thereby capturing a substantial temporal breadth to discern any potential trends or correlations.

The first step of our data collection process involved navigating the labyrinthine corridors of the EPA's air quality databases. After traversing this digital landscape, we extracted relevant air quality metrics, encapsulating parameters such as particulate matter, ozone levels, and various other atmospheric pollutants. The opacity of these datasets, much like the atmospheric haze they represent, necessitated a careful and systematic curation process to ensure the fidelity and coherence of the extracted information.

Simultaneously, we ventured into the digital realm of the FBI CJIS, where we embarked on a quest for arson-related data. The arduous endeavor of sifting through incendiary incidents, much like sifting through ashes for hidden embers, was not without its challenges. Nonetheless, through meticulous scrutiny, we unearthed a wealth of information on arson occurrences, including geographical details, incident dates, and contextual factors.

With our dataset assembled, we proceeded to apply statistical analyses to unravel the potential relationship between air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Leveraging the powers of correlation analysis, we sought to unveil any discernible patterns that might underlie these seemingly disparate phenomena. The statistical software employed in these analyses offered a powerful lens through which to peer into the smokescreen of data and discern the veiled associations lurking within.

Furthermore, in our endeavor to illuminate the potential impact of poor air quality on arson, we employed multivariate regression models to disentangle the confounding influence of various socio-demographic and economic factors. The intricate interplay of these variables, much like a complex chemical reaction, required a nuanced approach to isolate the unique effect of air quality on arson rates.

In conclusion, the multifaceted nature of our data collection and analytical procedures not only mirrors the intricate web of environmental and criminological factors entwined in this investigation but also exemplifies the importance of a meticulous and comprehensive approach to unraveling complex societal phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7457552, r-squared of 0.5561509, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we applied statistical analysis to investigate this pressing issue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022. The results not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also fan the flames of further research in this unexplored area. Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one can't help but ponder the irony of arson cases being "ignited" by the air quality in Cincinnati. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between environmental factors and criminal behavior has long been a subject of interest in the field of criminology. While traditional studies have often focused on socioeconomic conditions, the influence of air quality on criminal activity has received less attention. In particular, the connection between poor air quality and arson presents an intriguing avenue for exploration. The juxtaposition of literal "hot air" and figurative "hot air" - that is, the combustion of materials and the expression of deceit or nonsense - adds a layer of complexity to this investigation. It seems that the atmosphere in Cincinnati is not only inducing smog but also potentially fanning the flames of criminal activity.
In this study, we aim to delve into the relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. The city's reputation as an epicenter of this conundrum is not lost on us, much like a smokescreen that masks the deeper complexities of this issue. The city's nickname "The Queen City" serves as a fitting reminder that even in a regal place, the air quality may not always be up to royal standards. Our examination, however, extends beyond mere amusement at puns and amusing associations. The data-driven analysis that follows is intended to illuminate the gravity of this matter and bring it out of the shadows of speculative humor.
As the digital age spawns an ever-burgeoning wealth of data, the interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior emerges as a compelling area of study. The seemingly straightforward act of arson is indeed a multifaceted phenomenon, and our exploration into the potential influence of air quality introduces a breath of fresh air to the discourse. The sparks of curiosity that ignite our investigation are fanned by the significance of our findings, as we uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over a span of nearly four decades. The thermal metaphor, of course, is not lost on us as we observe the distinct possibilities of environmental impact on incendiary acts.
This paper is structured as follows: first, we will review the relevant literature on the connections between environmental factors and criminal behavior, paying heed to the nuanced nature of these interactions. Then, we will delve into the methodology employed in our study, outlining the data sources and analytical approaches woven into our investigative tapestry. Subsequently, we will present and discuss our findings, exploring the implications of the observed correlation. Finally, we will conclude with reflections on the implications of our work, igniting the flames of future inquiries into this enigmatic arson-air quality nexus.
In conclusion, this endeavour endeavors to blow away the smoke surrounding the potential impact of air quality on arson, shedding light on an oft-overlooked dimension of environmental criminology. The flickering connection between smog and arson is not merely a matter of convenience, but a deeper conundrum enveloped in a hazy cloud of curiosity, waiting to be illuminated by the torch of empirical investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States yielded a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 suggested a robust positive relationship between these two variables, indicating that as air quality worsened, incidences of arson tended to increase. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5561509 indicated that 55.61% of the variance in arson could be explained by variations in air quality, further underscoring the substantial link between these phenomena.

The significance level, with a p-value of less than 0.01, bolstered the confidence in the observed relationship, providing compelling evidence that the correlation was unlikely to be a result of random chance. This finding illuminated the compelling nature of the association between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States.

One visually striking representation of this relationship is evident in Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States.

The results not only substantiate the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also kindle the spark of further inquiry into this intriguing domain of environmental criminology. The observed correlation serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior, igniting a fervor for deeper exploration into this uncharted territory.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we applied statistical analysis to investigate this pressing issue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022. The results not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also fan the flames of further research in this unexplored area. Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one can't help but ponder the irony of arson cases being "ignited" by the air quality in Cincinnati. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors surveyed the existing literature on the connection between environmental factors and criminal behavior, focusing on the specific relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States.
Smith and Doe (2010) examined the impact of air pollution on human health and well-being, highlighting the potential implications for societal dynamics. Their work underscored the far-reaching effects of environmental conditions on various aspects of human life, framing the present investigation within a broader context of environmental criminology.
Jones et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of arson patterns across major metropolitan areas, revealing intriguing spatial and temporal trends. While their study did not explicitly address the influence of air quality, the authors' findings laid the groundwork for considering the potential interplay between atmospheric conditions and arson activity.
In "Book," the authors find that air pollution has been linked to respiratory ailments, cognitive impairments, and even cardiovascular diseases, prompting reflection on the more hidden impacts of poor air quality. The implications for mental well-being, and by extension, behavioral patterns, invite speculation on the potential indirect influence of air quality on criminal activities such as arson.
Turning to broader cultural and literary perspectives, "The Air We Breathe" by Andrea Barrett and "The Smoke Jumper" by Nicholas Evans offer fictional explorations of human experiences in environments marked by air quality concerns. While these narratives may not offer direct empirical evidence, they serve as artistic reflections that invite a more holistic consideration of the interweaving of environmental conditions and human behavior.
Venturing into less conventional sources, the authors acknowledge engaging in an extensive review of the backs of various household products, including but not limited to shampoo bottles, to gather diverse perspectives on air quality and its potential impact on human behavior. While these sources may not align with traditional academic discourses, they offer unique insights and aromatic amusement to the investigation at hand.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States yielded a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 suggested a robust positive relationship between these two variables, indicating that as air quality worsened, incidences of arson tended to increase. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5561509 indicated that 55.61% of the variance in arson could be explained by variations in air quality, further underscoring the substantial link between these phenomena.
The significance level, with a p-value of less than 0.01, bolstered the confidence in the observed relationship, providing compelling evidence that the correlation was unlikely to be a result of random chance. This finding illuminated the compelling nature of the association between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States.
One visually striking representation of this relationship is evident in Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States.
The results not only substantiate the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also kindle the spark of further inquiry into this intriguing domain of environmental criminology. The observed correlation serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior, igniting a fervor for deeper exploration into this uncharted territory.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has brought to light a compelling association between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States, adding fuel to the fire of the burgeoning field of environmental criminology. The robust correlation coefficient and the significant p-value support the notion that degraded air quality may indeed fan the flames of arson activities.

Our findings align with previous studies that have delved into the broader impact of environmental conditions on human behavior. Smith and Doe's exploration of the repercussions of air pollution on human wellbeing provides a sturdy foundation for our investigation. It seems that the adverse effects of poor air quality extend beyond respiratory and cardiovascular consequences, permeating into the realm of behavioral predispositions, potentially stoking the propensity for fire-related infractions.

Furthermore, the spatial and temporal analysis conducted by Jones et al. enabled our study to catalyze a deeper understanding of the temporal dynamics of arson incidence in relation to air quality fluctuations. This, in turn, ventilated our understanding of the temporal nuances of the observed association.

Moreover, the literary reflections on air quality and human experiences, as encapsulated in "The Air We Breathe" and "The Smoke Jumper," offer poetic and metaphorical insights into the complex interplay between environmental conditions and human conduct. These narratives, although not empirical, serve as a breath of fresh air in broadening our understanding of the multifaceted relationship between environmental factors and criminal behaviors.

In our quest for diverse perspectives, our unconventional scents of inquiry led us to dissecting the texts on household products to capture the diverse, albeit arguably fragrant, perspectives on air quality and its potential influences. Although tongue-in-cheek, this unorthodox approach has added an olfactory dimension to our study, accentuating the underlying aromatic humor in the investigation of serious subjects.

As our results spotlight the substantial link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and arson in the United States, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations of our study. The nature of observational studies precludes us from establishing causation, and confounding variables such as socioeconomic factors and law enforcement efforts may permeate our findings.

In conclusion, our research kindles the flame of inquiry into the nuanced relationship between environmental conditions and criminal activities, emphasizing the imperative of continued exploration in this fiery domain. Subsequent studies may illuminate the intricacies of this association, serving as a beacon of understanding in the quest to dampen the flames of arson incidence through improved air quality management.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Cincinnati and Arson in United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we applied statistical analysis to investigate this pressing issue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022. The results not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also fan the flames of further research in this unexplored area. Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one can't help but ponder the irony of arson cases being "ignited" by the air quality in Cincinnati. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and criminal behavior has long been a subject of interest in the field of criminology. While traditional studies have often focused on socioeconomic conditions, the influence of air quality on criminal activity has received less attention. In particular, the connection between poor air quality and arson presents an intriguing avenue for exploration. The juxtaposition of literal "hot air" and figurative "hot air" - that is, the combustion of materials and the expression of deceit or nonsense - adds a layer of complexity to this investigation. It seems that the atmosphere in Cincinnati is not only inducing smog but also potentially fanning the flames of criminal activity.
In this study, we aim to delve into the relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. The city's reputation as an epicenter of this conundrum is not lost on us, much like a smokescreen that masks the deeper complexities of this issue. The city's nickname "The Queen City" serves as a fitting reminder that even in a regal place, the air quality may not always be up to royal standards. Our examination, however, extends beyond mere amusement at puns and amusing associations. The data-driven analysis that follows is intended to illuminate the gravity of this matter and bring it out of the shadows of speculative humor.
As the digital age spawns an ever-burgeoning wealth of data, the interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior emerges as a compelling area of study. The seemingly straightforward act of arson is indeed a multifaceted phenomenon, and our exploration into the potential influence of air quality introduces a breath of fresh air to the discourse. The sparks of curiosity that ignite our investigation are fanned by the significance of our findings, as we uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over a span of nearly four decades. The thermal metaphor, of course, is not lost on us as we observe the distinct possibilities of environmental impact on incendiary acts.
This paper is structured as follows: first, we will review the relevant literature on the connections between environmental factors and criminal behavior, paying heed to the nuanced nature of these interactions. Then, we will delve into the methodology employed in our study, outlining the data sources and analytical approaches woven into our investigative tapestry. Subsequently, we will present and discuss our findings, exploring the implications of the observed correlation. Finally, we will conclude with reflections on the implications of our work, igniting the flames of future inquiries into this enigmatic arson-air quality nexus.
In conclusion, this endeavour endeavors to blow away the smoke surrounding the potential impact of air quality on arson, shedding light on an oft-overlooked dimension of environmental criminology. The flickering connection between smog and arson is not merely a matter of convenience, but a deeper conundrum enveloped in a hazy cloud of curiosity, waiting to be illuminated by the torch of empirical investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States yielded a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 suggested a robust positive relationship between these two variables, indicating that as air quality worsened, incidences of arson tended to increase. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5561509 indicated that 55.61% of the variance in arson could be explained by variations in air quality, further underscoring the substantial link between these phenomena.
The significance level, with a p-value of less than 0.01, bolstered the confidence in the observed relationship, providing compelling evidence that the correlation was unlikely to be a result of random chance. This finding illuminated the compelling nature of the association between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States.
One visually striking representation of this relationship is evident in Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States.
The results not only substantiate the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also kindle the spark of further inquiry into this intriguing domain of environmental criminology. The observed correlation serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and criminal behavior, igniting a fervor for deeper exploration into this uncharted territory.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a compelling relationship between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States, providing empirical support for the notion that environmental conditions can fan the flames of criminal behavior. Our findings not only add fuel to the fire of scholarly inquiry in the field of environmental criminology but also hint at the potential for broader societal implications. It seems that the old adage "where there's smoke, there's fire" takes on a literal dimension in the context of our research, as the murky haze of poor air quality appears to be accompanied by an increased propensity for arson.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and the significant p-value of less than 0.01 have not only stoked the flames of interest in this area but have also smothered any doubts about the strength of the observed relationship. Our study has shed light on the combustible nature of the interaction between air quality and criminal behavior, emphasizing the need for further investigation into this fiery nexus.

Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one cannot help but marvel at the fiery irony of Cincinnati's air quality being implicated in igniting criminal activity across the nation. It seems that the Queen City's atmospheric conditions have indeed played a pivotal role in kindling the incendiary passions of arsonists throughout the United States. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.

As we pour over our findings, it becomes clear that the confluence of air quality and arson is not merely a flash in the pan but represents a burning issue meriting sustained attention. However, we must acknowledge the limitations of our study, such as the potential presence of unmeasured confounding variables and the specific contextual factors that may influence the observed relationship. Nonetheless, our investigation serves as a beacon, inviting further research endeavors to shine a light on this captivating intersection of environmental and criminological factors.

In light of our incendiary findings, we assert with confidence that no further research is needed in this area. The flames of inquiry have been well and truly stoked, leaving no need for further kindling.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Combustion Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Environmental Criminology and Fire Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Quality and Arson: Fuelling the Fire in Cincinnati with an abstract of This study examines the link between poor air quality in Cincinnati and the incidence of arson in the United States. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we applied statistical analysis to investigate this pressing issue. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7457552 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1985 to 2022. The results not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on arson rates but also fan the flames of further research in this unexplored area. Despite the serious nature of our investigation, one can't help but ponder the irony of arson cases being "ignited" by the air quality in Cincinnati. This connection serves as a stark reminder that the various components of our environment - both physical and social - interact in unexpected and complex ways, sometimes leading to unexpected infernos of correlation.

ChatGPT:

Air quality, arson, Cincinnati, United States, Environmental Protection Agency, FBI, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, 1985-2022, air pollution, crime, environmental impact, Cincinnati air quality, arson rates, correlation between air quality and arson

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Cincinnati
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Cincinnati

Arson in United States
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in United States

Correlation r = 0.7457552 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5561509 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Cincinnati) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-8. 0.0000000775721789268794300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 7.8E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,891,220 random variables You don't actually need 12 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.86 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Cincinnati (Bad air quality days)4.109597.3972613.150716.12025.479456.02747.397261.639344.383565.479457.397265.464483.835626.301378.767122.732243.835628.219183.287670.5464485.205481.917813.287671.6393401.095891.917812.45902000.273973000.5479450000.273973
Arson in United States (Arson rate)43.646.342.54141.441.74140.837.339.636.734.632.629.728.824.727.726.82523.623.124.422.621.619.518.117.517.614.914.513.714.113.2121113.98.911.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.10959,7.39726,13.1507,16.1202,5.47945,6.0274,7.39726,1.63934,4.38356,5.47945,7.39726,5.46448,3.83562,6.30137,8.76712,2.73224,3.83562,8.21918,3.28767,0.546448,5.20548,1.91781,3.28767,1.63934,0,1.09589,1.91781,2.45902,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0.547945,0,0,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([43.6,46.3,42.5,41,41.4,41.7,41,40.8,37.3,39.6,36.7,34.6,32.6,29.7,28.8,24.7,27.7,26.8,25,23.6,23.1,24.4,22.6,21.6,19.5,18.1,17.5,17.6,14.9,14.5,13.7,14.1,13.2,12,11,13.9,8.9,11.6,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Cincinnati"
array_2_name = "Arson in United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 1354 · Black Variable ID: 20464 · Red Variable ID: 20038
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0