Download png, svg
AI explanation
As GMO use in corn decreased, the natural sweetness of the corn increased. This led to a rise in romantic corn-related activities, such as corn mazes for two and candlelit corn dinners. As more people got caught up in corny romance, the demand for xkcd comics about romance decreased, prompting the decrease in such comics published. Corny love stories were popping up everywhere, and it simply didn't kernel the same level of interest in the xkcd comics anymore.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create a vibrant cyber folk-inspired image of a farmer in a cozy kitchen, standing near a large pile of bright yellow corn cobs. Some of the cobs are labeled "GMO." On the wall, a comic strip from xkcd is pinned up, depicting stick figure characters in a romantic scene. The farmer is chuckling while reading the comic, surrounded by the bountiful corn crop. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because the decrease in GMO use in corn led to a decrease in corny jokes, which in turn led to a decrease in romance xkcd comics. Corny humor fertilizes romance, and without the GMO corn, the punny inspiration dried up faster than a cob in a popcorn factory.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Cubism Futuristic Cyber folk Psychedelic
ChatGPT: Cyber folk
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn and xkcd comics published about romance Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy kitchen, a farmer is standing next to a huge pile of bright yellow corn cobs. Some of the cobs have a small label on them indicating "GMO." On the wall, a comic strip from xkcd is pinned up, showing stick figure characters in a romantic scene, with speech bubbles floating above their heads. The farmer is chuckling while reading the comic, surrounded by the bountiful corn crop.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy kitchen, a farmer is standing next to a huge pile of bright yellow corn cobs. Some of the cobs have a small label on them indicating "GMO." On the wall, a comic strip from xkcd is pinned up, showing stick figure characters in a romantic scene, with speech bubbles floating above their heads. The farmer is chuckling while reading the comic, surrounded by the bountiful corn crop. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create a vibrant cyber folk-inspired image of a farmer in a cozy kitchen, standing near a large pile of bright yellow corn cobs. Some of the cobs are labeled "GMO." On the wall, a comic strip from xkcd is pinned up, depicting stick figure characters in a romantic scene. The farmer is chuckling while reading the comic, surrounded by the bountiful corn crop.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn caused xkcd comics published about romance to decrease. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis The Journal of Agricultural Amusement Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to explore the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing the theme of romance. Using rigorous statistical analysis, this study delves into a unique and lighthearted intersection of agriculture and popular culture. Data from the USDA on GMO corn usage over the timeframe of 2007 to 2023 were combined with an AI analysis of xkcd comics to uncover unexpected connections. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, suggesting a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between agricultural practices and online comic content, but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of diverse domains of human activity. This research sets a precedent for incorporating humor and levity into the scholarly exploration of complex topics, paving the way for future studies to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies within the realms of science and humor.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to explore the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing the theme of romance. Using rigorous statistical analysis, this study delves into a unique and lighthearted intersection of agriculture and popular culture. Data from the USDA on GMO corn usage over the timeframe of 2007 to 2023 were combined with an AI analysis of xkcd comics to uncover unexpected connections. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, suggesting a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between agricultural practices and online comic content, but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of diverse domains of human activity. This research sets a precedent for incorporating humor and levity into the scholarly exploration of complex topics, paving the way for future studies to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies within the realms of science and humor.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast field of scientific inquiry, there are certain questions that nudge their way to the forefront, demanding attention and scrutiny. Some questions are straightforward, others are perplexing, and then there are those that seem to have sprouted from the fertile crossroads of curiosity and whimsy. Our study delves into the latter category, as we embark on a rather unique and lighthearted investigation into the connection between two seemingly disparate subjects: genetically modified corn and xkcd comics about romance. The union of these topics may initially elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise, but as we delve deeper, an unexpected and comical correlation emerges.
The deliberate choice to explore this intersection stems from our conviction that within the seemingly serious realms of agriculture and comic art, there lies untapped potential for mirth and surprise. While GMO corn production may seem to belong more to the fields of agronomy and economics, and xkcd comics may be perceived as the quirky musings of an internet-based artist, we posit that there exists a shared heartbeat—albeit masked beneath layers of corn husks and pixelated sketches. Through this undertaking, we aim to unravel the enigmatic thread joining these seemingly incongruous domains.
The title of our study, "Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis," encapsulates our approach—a light-hearted yet methodical exploration that recognizes the inherent playfulness and absurdity in the pursuit of knowledge. As we venture forth into uncharted comedic territory, we invite our readers to join us in embracing the unexpected connections that transcend conventional academic boundaries. While the correlation between GMO corn and xkcd comics may seem bewildering at first glance, we assure you that our findings reveal a surprising affinity that traverses the realms of science, culture, and satire, with a sprinkle of humor to season the inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to explore the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing the theme of romance. Using rigorous statistical analysis, this study delves into a unique and lighthearted intersection of agriculture and popular culture. Data from the USDA on GMO corn usage over the timeframe of 2007 to 2023 were combined with an AI analysis of xkcd comics to uncover unexpected connections. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, suggesting a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between agricultural practices and online comic content, but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of diverse domains of human activity. This research sets a precedent for incorporating humor and levity into the scholarly exploration of complex topics, paving the way for future studies to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies within the realms of science and humor.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast field of scientific inquiry, there are certain questions that nudge their way to the forefront, demanding attention and scrutiny. Some questions are straightforward, others are perplexing, and then there are those that seem to have sprouted from the fertile crossroads of curiosity and whimsy. Our study delves into the latter category, as we embark on a rather unique and lighthearted investigation into the connection between two seemingly disparate subjects: genetically modified corn and xkcd comics about romance. The union of these topics may initially elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise, but as we delve deeper, an unexpected and comical correlation emerges.
The deliberate choice to explore this intersection stems from our conviction that within the seemingly serious realms of agriculture and comic art, there lies untapped potential for mirth and surprise. While GMO corn production may seem to belong more to the fields of agronomy and economics, and xkcd comics may be perceived as the quirky musings of an internet-based artist, we posit that there exists a shared heartbeat—albeit masked beneath layers of corn husks and pixelated sketches. Through this undertaking, we aim to unravel the enigmatic thread joining these seemingly incongruous domains.
The title of our study, "Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis," encapsulates our approach—a light-hearted yet methodical exploration that recognizes the inherent playfulness and absurdity in the pursuit of knowledge. As we venture forth into uncharted comedic territory, we invite our readers to join us in embracing the unexpected connections that transcend conventional academic boundaries. While the correlation between GMO corn and xkcd comics may seem bewildering at first glance, we assure you that our findings reveal a surprising affinity that traverses the realms of science, culture, and satire, with a sprinkle of humor to season the inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The link between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and cultural phenomena has been a topic of interest for researchers across various disciplines. Smith et al. (2014) explored the impact of GMO corn on agricultural production, while Doe (2018) investigated public perceptions of genetically modified foods. Furthermore, Jones (2016) provided a comprehensive analysis of the economic implications of GMO crop cultivation. These studies lay the groundwork for understanding the practical and socio-economic dimensions of GMO corn use.
Turning to the realm of popular culture, non-fiction works such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond have provided insights into the interplay between human dietary habits and agricultural practices. Fictional literature also offers intriguing glimpses into the potential intersections between GMO corn and cultural themes. Works such as Margaret Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" and Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl" delve into speculative futures where genetic engineering and agricultural production play central roles.
In addition to published works, social media discussions and musings have offered informal, yet thought-provoking perspectives on the relationship between GMOs and cultural phenomena. Anecdotal evidence from Twitter threads and Reddit forums suggests a growing interest in the portrayal of agricultural practices in popular media, with occasional references to the xkcd webcomic series.
However, it is important to note that while these sources provide valuable context, the specific connection between GMO corn and xkcd comics addressing romance remains an underexplored frontier in academic literature. Our study seeks to bridge this gap by offering a rigorous and playful examination of this intriguing intersection, shedding light on an unexpected correlation that defies conventional disciplinary boundaries.
In the next section, we will delve into the methodological approach employed in our investigation, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of agricultural science and online comic artistry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to explore the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing the theme of romance. Using rigorous statistical analysis, this study delves into a unique and lighthearted intersection of agriculture and popular culture. Data from the USDA on GMO corn usage over the timeframe of 2007 to 2023 were combined with an AI analysis of xkcd comics to uncover unexpected connections. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, suggesting a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between agricultural practices and online comic content, but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of diverse domains of human activity. This research sets a precedent for incorporating humor and levity into the scholarly exploration of complex topics, paving the way for future studies to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies within the realms of science and humor.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast field of scientific inquiry, there are certain questions that nudge their way to the forefront, demanding attention and scrutiny. Some questions are straightforward, others are perplexing, and then there are those that seem to have sprouted from the fertile crossroads of curiosity and whimsy. Our study delves into the latter category, as we embark on a rather unique and lighthearted investigation into the connection between two seemingly disparate subjects: genetically modified corn and xkcd comics about romance. The union of these topics may initially elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise, but as we delve deeper, an unexpected and comical correlation emerges.
The deliberate choice to explore this intersection stems from our conviction that within the seemingly serious realms of agriculture and comic art, there lies untapped potential for mirth and surprise. While GMO corn production may seem to belong more to the fields of agronomy and economics, and xkcd comics may be perceived as the quirky musings of an internet-based artist, we posit that there exists a shared heartbeat—albeit masked beneath layers of corn husks and pixelated sketches. Through this undertaking, we aim to unravel the enigmatic thread joining these seemingly incongruous domains.
The title of our study, "Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis," encapsulates our approach—a light-hearted yet methodical exploration that recognizes the inherent playfulness and absurdity in the pursuit of knowledge. As we venture forth into uncharted comedic territory, we invite our readers to join us in embracing the unexpected connections that transcend conventional academic boundaries. While the correlation between GMO corn and xkcd comics may seem bewildering at first glance, we assure you that our findings reveal a surprising affinity that traverses the realms of science, culture, and satire, with a sprinkle of humor to season the inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In our pursuit to illuminate the whimsical bond between genetically modified corn and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics, our methodology employed a curious blend of quantitative data analysis and playful algorithmic scrutiny. The first step in our approach involved gathering data on the prevalence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production. Utilizing information from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and various agricultural databases, we compiled a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 2007 to 2023. This dataset provided us with rich insights into the usage and diffusion of GMO corn across different geographic regions and agricultural systems.
Simultaneously, to ascertain the occurrence and patterns of xkcd comics that delineate the theme of romance, we turned to the digital sphere. Leveraging an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm specially tailored to scour the colorful landscape of xkcd comics, we meticulously cataloged and scrutinized an extensive array of comic strips. This allowed us to discern and quantify the prevalence of romance-themed content within the formidable repository of xkcd offerings, spanning the same time frame as our agricultural dataset.
One crucial element of our methodology involved the development of a whimsically calibrated joke-meter, designed to gauge the comedic absurdity and off-kilter humor quotient of the xkcd comics. This innovative meter, developed in collaboration with renowned experts in comedic evaluation, seamlessly integrated into our analytical pipeline, ensuring a subtle yet indispensable consideration of the comedic dimension within our study.
Having amassed an exuberant compilation of agricultural and comic data, we then applied robust statistical methods to unravel the intricate relationship between GMO corn usage and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. Employing correlation analysis, regression models, and time-series examination, we sought to elucidate the underlying connections that emerged from this seemingly incongruous pairing.
Furthermore, in light of the unconventional nature of our study, we conscientiously integrated a qualitative component to our methodology. This involved engaging in interpretive deep dives into select xkcd comics, scrutinizing the comedic nuances and subtle reflections on societal humor embedded within the illustrated narratives. We exercised meticulous care in this qualitative exploration, ensuring that the lighthearted essence of the comics was fully encapsulated within our analytical framework.
Overall, our methodological concoction crafted an eclectic blend of empirical rigor and whimsical inspection, accentuating the interplay of data-driven examination and subtle humor detection. This innovative approach not only facilitated the exploration of unexpected correlations but also epitomized the whimsical essence of our research, inviting a chuckle or two amidst the rigors of scientific inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics .
For the time period 2007 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9177684, r-squared of 0.8422988, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to explore the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing the theme of romance. Using rigorous statistical analysis, this study delves into a unique and lighthearted intersection of agriculture and popular culture. Data from the USDA on GMO corn usage over the timeframe of 2007 to 2023 were combined with an AI analysis of xkcd comics to uncover unexpected connections. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, suggesting a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between agricultural practices and online comic content, but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of diverse domains of human activity. This research sets a precedent for incorporating humor and levity into the scholarly exploration of complex topics, paving the way for future studies to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies within the realms of science and humor.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the vast field of scientific inquiry, there are certain questions that nudge their way to the forefront, demanding attention and scrutiny. Some questions are straightforward, others are perplexing, and then there are those that seem to have sprouted from the fertile crossroads of curiosity and whimsy. Our study delves into the latter category, as we embark on a rather unique and lighthearted investigation into the connection between two seemingly disparate subjects: genetically modified corn and xkcd comics about romance. The union of these topics may initially elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise, but as we delve deeper, an unexpected and comical correlation emerges.
The deliberate choice to explore this intersection stems from our conviction that within the seemingly serious realms of agriculture and comic art, there lies untapped potential for mirth and surprise. While GMO corn production may seem to belong more to the fields of agronomy and economics, and xkcd comics may be perceived as the quirky musings of an internet-based artist, we posit that there exists a shared heartbeat—albeit masked beneath layers of corn husks and pixelated sketches. Through this undertaking, we aim to unravel the enigmatic thread joining these seemingly incongruous domains.
The title of our study, "Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis," encapsulates our approach—a light-hearted yet methodical exploration that recognizes the inherent playfulness and absurdity in the pursuit of knowledge. As we venture forth into uncharted comedic territory, we invite our readers to join us in embracing the unexpected connections that transcend conventional academic boundaries. While the correlation between GMO corn and xkcd comics may seem bewildering at first glance, we assure you that our findings reveal a surprising affinity that traverses the realms of science, culture, and satire, with a sprinkle of humor to season the inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between genetically modified corn (GMO) usage and the occurrence of xkcd comics addressing romance yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 suggests a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8422988 indicates that approximately 84.23% of the variability in the frequency of romance-themed xkcd comics can be explained by the fluctuations in GMO corn usage.
Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation through a scatterplot, visually displaying the close alignment of the data points. It's quite remarkable how the intersection of GMO corn and xkcd romance plots seems to have sprouted from the same vine. One could almost imagine stalks of modified corn playfully intertwining with pixelated hearts and speech bubbles.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further strengthens the persuasiveness of our findings. At this level, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that there is a genuine association between GMO corn deployment and the thematic focus of xkcd comics.
Our results not only highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between agricultural practices and online comic content but also allude to the whimsical resonance that echoes through the fields of science and humor. While the implications of this correlation may not sow the seeds of a grand theory, they certainly offer a playful reminder that even in the most unlikely places, love, laughter, and genetically modified crops can find common ground.
These findings pave the way for future research to explore the idiosyncrasies of seemingly unrelated phenomena, injecting a tinge of humor and surprise into the tapestry of academic inquiry. Ultimately, our study stands as a testament to the enduring whimsy that underlies the pursuit of knowledge, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to revel in the unexpected connections that flourish amidst the most improbable pairings.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to explore the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing the theme of romance. Using rigorous statistical analysis, this study delves into a unique and lighthearted intersection of agriculture and popular culture. Data from the USDA on GMO corn usage over the timeframe of 2007 to 2023 were combined with an AI analysis of xkcd comics to uncover unexpected connections. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, suggesting a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between agricultural practices and online comic content, but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of diverse domains of human activity. This research sets a precedent for incorporating humor and levity into the scholarly exploration of complex topics, paving the way for future studies to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies within the realms of science and humor.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The link between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and cultural phenomena has been a topic of interest for researchers across various disciplines. Smith et al. (2014) explored the impact of GMO corn on agricultural production, while Doe (2018) investigated public perceptions of genetically modified foods. Furthermore, Jones (2016) provided a comprehensive analysis of the economic implications of GMO crop cultivation. These studies lay the groundwork for understanding the practical and socio-economic dimensions of GMO corn use.
Turning to the realm of popular culture, non-fiction works such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond have provided insights into the interplay between human dietary habits and agricultural practices. Fictional literature also offers intriguing glimpses into the potential intersections between GMO corn and cultural themes. Works such as Margaret Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" and Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl" delve into speculative futures where genetic engineering and agricultural production play central roles.
In addition to published works, social media discussions and musings have offered informal, yet thought-provoking perspectives on the relationship between GMOs and cultural phenomena. Anecdotal evidence from Twitter threads and Reddit forums suggests a growing interest in the portrayal of agricultural practices in popular media, with occasional references to the xkcd webcomic series.
However, it is important to note that while these sources provide valuable context, the specific connection between GMO corn and xkcd comics addressing romance remains an underexplored frontier in academic literature. Our study seeks to bridge this gap by offering a rigorous and playful examination of this intriguing intersection, shedding light on an unexpected correlation that defies conventional disciplinary boundaries.
In the next section, we will delve into the methodological approach employed in our investigation, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of agricultural science and online comic artistry.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between genetically modified corn (GMO) usage and the occurrence of xkcd comics addressing romance yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 suggests a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8422988 indicates that approximately 84.23% of the variability in the frequency of romance-themed xkcd comics can be explained by the fluctuations in GMO corn usage.
Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation through a scatterplot, visually displaying the close alignment of the data points. It's quite remarkable how the intersection of GMO corn and xkcd romance plots seems to have sprouted from the same vine. One could almost imagine stalks of modified corn playfully intertwining with pixelated hearts and speech bubbles.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further strengthens the persuasiveness of our findings. At this level, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that there is a genuine association between GMO corn deployment and the thematic focus of xkcd comics.
Our results not only highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between agricultural practices and online comic content but also allude to the whimsical resonance that echoes through the fields of science and humor. While the implications of this correlation may not sow the seeds of a grand theory, they certainly offer a playful reminder that even in the most unlikely places, love, laughter, and genetically modified crops can find common ground.
These findings pave the way for future research to explore the idiosyncrasies of seemingly unrelated phenomena, injecting a tinge of humor and surprise into the tapestry of academic inquiry. Ultimately, our study stands as a testament to the enduring whimsy that underlies the pursuit of knowledge, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to revel in the unexpected connections that flourish amidst the most improbable pairings.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing romance has unearthed intriguing and, dare I say, corny revelations. We set out on this convoluted quest, expecting to wade through fields of data, but what we harvested were not just statistical numbers, but an earful of tickling insights.
At first, the idea that the intensity of GMO corn deployment could intertwine with the romantic musings of xkcd seemed as improbable as a tomato growing on a cornstalk - yet the results leave little room for doubt. Our statistical analysis confirmed a robust positive linear relationship between the two variables, reminiscent of an unexpectedly successful blind date. The r-squared value of 0.8422988 attests to the strong explanatory power of GMO corn usage in predicting the frequency of romance-themed xkcd comics. One might jest that this link is as solid as a cob of corn on a hot summer's day!
Building on the groundwork laid by Smith, Doe, and Jones, our findings align with prior research demonstrating the influence of GMO corn on societal and cultural dynamics. Our humorous foray into the unlikely connection between agriculture and online comic content offers an amusing yet compelling extension of the existing literature. Who would have thought that the world of GMO corn and the quirky, wry universe of xkcd could share such a gentle, statistically significant bond?
Moreover, these results provide a whimsical testament to the interdisciplinary nature of academic inquiry, proving that even in the seemingly non-adjacent realms of agriculture and comic artistry, unexpected connections can stem from the most unlikely seeds. Our findings underscore the value of embracing humorous and unconventional approaches to scholarly exploration, showcasing the potential for unexpected laughter and insight to sprout from the most unassuming places.
In conclusion, the amorous dance between genetically modified corn and romance-themed xkcd comics serves as a poignant reminder that when it comes to the delightful tapestry of human experience, even the most incongruous pairings can, against all odds, discover a shared lime-light—a seed of hope for interdisciplinary inquiry. And so, we leave the reader not with just statistical significance, but with a chuckle, a touch of whimsy, and an indelible impression of the peculiar and joyful interconnectedness that characterizes the pursuit of knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and xkcd comics published about romance. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to explore the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing the theme of romance. Using rigorous statistical analysis, this study delves into a unique and lighthearted intersection of agriculture and popular culture. Data from the USDA on GMO corn usage over the timeframe of 2007 to 2023 were combined with an AI analysis of xkcd comics to uncover unexpected connections. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, suggesting a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between agricultural practices and online comic content, but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of diverse domains of human activity. This research sets a precedent for incorporating humor and levity into the scholarly exploration of complex topics, paving the way for future studies to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies within the realms of science and humor.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the vast field of scientific inquiry, there are certain questions that nudge their way to the forefront, demanding attention and scrutiny. Some questions are straightforward, others are perplexing, and then there are those that seem to have sprouted from the fertile crossroads of curiosity and whimsy. Our study delves into the latter category, as we embark on a rather unique and lighthearted investigation into the connection between two seemingly disparate subjects: genetically modified corn and xkcd comics about romance. The union of these topics may initially elicit a quizzical eyebrow raise, but as we delve deeper, an unexpected and comical correlation emerges.
The deliberate choice to explore this intersection stems from our conviction that within the seemingly serious realms of agriculture and comic art, there lies untapped potential for mirth and surprise. While GMO corn production may seem to belong more to the fields of agronomy and economics, and xkcd comics may be perceived as the quirky musings of an internet-based artist, we posit that there exists a shared heartbeat—albeit masked beneath layers of corn husks and pixelated sketches. Through this undertaking, we aim to unravel the enigmatic thread joining these seemingly incongruous domains.
The title of our study, "Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis," encapsulates our approach—a light-hearted yet methodical exploration that recognizes the inherent playfulness and absurdity in the pursuit of knowledge. As we venture forth into uncharted comedic territory, we invite our readers to join us in embracing the unexpected connections that transcend conventional academic boundaries. While the correlation between GMO corn and xkcd comics may seem bewildering at first glance, we assure you that our findings reveal a surprising affinity that traverses the realms of science, culture, and satire, with a sprinkle of humor to season the inquiry.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between genetically modified corn (GMO) usage and the occurrence of xkcd comics addressing romance yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 suggests a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8422988 indicates that approximately 84.23% of the variability in the frequency of romance-themed xkcd comics can be explained by the fluctuations in GMO corn usage.
Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation through a scatterplot, visually displaying the close alignment of the data points. It's quite remarkable how the intersection of GMO corn and xkcd romance plots seems to have sprouted from the same vine. One could almost imagine stalks of modified corn playfully intertwining with pixelated hearts and speech bubbles.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further strengthens the persuasiveness of our findings. At this level, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that there is a genuine association between GMO corn deployment and the thematic focus of xkcd comics.
Our results not only highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between agricultural practices and online comic content but also allude to the whimsical resonance that echoes through the fields of science and humor. While the implications of this correlation may not sow the seeds of a grand theory, they certainly offer a playful reminder that even in the most unlikely places, love, laughter, and genetically modified crops can find common ground.
These findings pave the way for future research to explore the idiosyncrasies of seemingly unrelated phenomena, injecting a tinge of humor and surprise into the tapestry of academic inquiry. Ultimately, our study stands as a testament to the enduring whimsy that underlies the pursuit of knowledge, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to revel in the unexpected connections that flourish amidst the most improbable pairings.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has gingerly plucked at the strings of correlation between genetically modified corn and the thematic presence of romance in xkcd comics, revealing a noteworthy intertwining of the two seemingly dissonant subjects. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value affirm the unexpected bond that seems to have sprouted between the world of modified corn and the digital musings of romance in xkcd comics. While our findings may prompt a chuckle and induce a raised eyebrow, they beckon scholars and enthusiasts alike to embrace the whimsical winds that occasionally blow through the fields of academia.
The humorous tapestry woven by the unlikely correlation between agriculture and webcomic romance offers a humorous reminder that science and humor are not entirely incompatible bedfellows. This lighthearted linkage presents fertile ground for future explorations into the whimsical side of scholarly inquiry. As much as we may be tempted to let our imaginations run wild and speculate on the nature of this peculiar connection, we must retain a sense of scientific sobriety and acknowledge that further research in this area is not necessary. Any more studies on this topic would be akin to forcing a corny joke – a-maize-ing as it may seem, the pun ultimately falls flat.
In light of this, we commend this research to the scholarly community as an example of how unearthing unexpected connections can infuse the pursuit of knowledge with a touch of levity, and we humbly recommend redirecting scholarly efforts to other, less whimsical domains. As much as we may be charmed by the revelations in this study, it is time to bid farewell to the romance between GMO corn and xkcd comics and leave this amusing corncidence to rest in the annals of academe.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Agricultural Amusement
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Silly Science Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis with an abstract of This paper seeks to explore the correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the frequency of xkcd comics addressing the theme of romance. Using rigorous statistical analysis, this study delves into a unique and lighthearted intersection of agriculture and popular culture. Data from the USDA on GMO corn usage over the timeframe of 2007 to 2023 were combined with an AI analysis of xkcd comics to uncover unexpected connections. Surprisingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.9177684 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, suggesting a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings not only provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between agricultural practices and online comic content, but also offer a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of diverse domains of human activity. This research sets a precedent for incorporating humor and levity into the scholarly exploration of complex topics, paving the way for future studies to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies within the realms of science and humor.
ChatGPT:
genetically modified corn, GMOs, corn production, agriculture, xkcd comics, romance theme, USDA data, AI analysis, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, online comic content, interconnectedness, human activity
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GMO use in cornDetailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in United States that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn
xkcd comics published about romance
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about romance
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.
See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about romance
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8422988 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about romance) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn) over the 17 years from 2007 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.1E-7. 0.0000002103868623070915000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 2.1E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,753,149 random variables You don't actually need 4 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.78, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
GMO use in corn (GMO corn %) | 21 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
xkcd comics published about romance (xkcd comics) | 38 | 35 | 21 | 28 | 11 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21,17,17,16,16,15,5,4,4,3,3,2,3,3,3,3,3,])
array_2 = np.array([38,35,21,28,11,18,3,4,3,2,3,1,1,5,6,3,5,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about romance"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GMO use in corn
- Line chart for only xkcd comics published about romance
- The spurious research paper: Genetically Modified Corn and Glimpses of Romance: A Goofy Analysis
Cheers to you for rating this correlation!
Correlation ID: 1335 · Black Variable ID: 724 · Red Variable ID: 20013