about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,334 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Kosovo.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn cobs were actually secretly functioning as mini jet engines, so with fewer GMOs, there were fewer power-packed cobs to fuel the planes. It's not turbulence in the air, it's cornspiracy in the fields!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic agricultural scene where a farmer is tending to rows of genetically modified corn plants in a vast Iowa field. The farmer is surrounded by tall, healthy crops, some of which are labeled as GMOs. In the distance, a sleek commercial airliner is seen taking off from the Kosovo airport, leaving behind a striking trail of jet fuel exhaust in the sky. The setting should convey a sense of modernity and advanced technology, blending the rural landscape with elements of futuristic air travel. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Iowa's reduced GMO corn use may have inadvertently caused a dip in jet fuel usage in Kosovo. The correlation is thought to stem from a decrease in corn syrup production, leading to a shortage of fizzy drinks in Kosovo and subsequently less demand for jet fuel for carbonated beverage transportation.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic inspired by bauhaus Charcoal A scene from Skyrim Psychedelic
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Jet fuel used in Kosovo Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Iowa, a farmer is seen tending to rows of tall, healthy corn plants. Some of the plants have a label indicating that they are genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In the distance, a commercial airliner is taking off from Kosovo, leaving behind a trail of jet fuel exhaust in the sky.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Iowa, a farmer is seen tending to rows of tall, healthy corn plants. Some of the plants have a label indicating that they are genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In the distance, a commercial airliner is taking off from Kosovo, leaving behind a trail of jet fuel exhaust in the sky. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic agricultural scene where a farmer is tending to rows of genetically modified corn plants in a vast Iowa field. The farmer is surrounded by tall, healthy crops, some of which are labeled as GMOs. In the distance, a sleek commercial airliner is seen taking off from the Kosovo airport, leaving behind a striking trail of jet fuel exhaust in the sky. The setting should convey a sense of modernity and advanced technology, blending the rural landscape with elements of futuristic air travel.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Iowa caused Jet fuel used in Kosovo to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection

The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Jet fuel used in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unraveled the intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The research team, fueled by curiosity and fueled by caffeine, utilized USDA and Energy Information Administration data to dig into this perplexing relationship. Surprisingly, we discovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2021, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated factors.

With kernels of curiosity and a-corny jokes, we delved deeper into the underlying mechanisms that could possibly link these agricultural and energy phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the GMO-jet fuel nexus, but also give new meaning to the phrase "fuel for thought". Despite the puzzling nature of this connection, one thing is clear - when it comes to GMO and jet fuel, there's no corn-fusion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Jet fuel used in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unraveled the intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The research team, fueled by curiosity and fueled by caffeine, utilized USDA and Energy Information Administration data to dig into this perplexing relationship. Surprisingly, we discovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2021, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated factors.

With kernels of curiosity and a-corny jokes, we delved deeper into the underlying mechanisms that could possibly link these agricultural and energy phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the GMO-jet fuel nexus, but also give new meaning to the phrase "fuel for thought". Despite the puzzling nature of this connection, one thing is clear - when it comes to GMO and jet fuel, there's no corn-fusion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

Imagine a world where the fields of Iowa and the skies of Kosovo are intrinsically linked, where the humble corn plant and the roaring jet engine conspire together in a cosmic dance of cause and effect. It may sound as fantastical as a corn hustle and jet bustle, but our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. As we embark on this academic adventure, we assure you that our findings are as corny as they are captivating.

The intersection of agriculture and energy may seem as unlikely as a corny joke at a scientific conference, but our study ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the hidden threads that tie together these seemingly disparate realms. The GMO-jet fuel connection is as perplexing as trying to explain a complex statistical model to your grandparents—yet, in the spirit of scientific curiosity, we aim to crack this kernel of a mystery wide open.

The bond between GMO corn and jet fuel consumption may seem as strange as the love affair between a scarecrow and a jet plane—a real "corny" romance, you might say. However, our investigation has revealed a compelling statistical relationship that demands attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up for the "corn and the furious" ride that awaits us as we explore the unexpected intersection of agriculture and aviation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Jet fuel used in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unraveled the intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The research team, fueled by curiosity and fueled by caffeine, utilized USDA and Energy Information Administration data to dig into this perplexing relationship. Surprisingly, we discovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2021, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated factors.

With kernels of curiosity and a-corny jokes, we delved deeper into the underlying mechanisms that could possibly link these agricultural and energy phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the GMO-jet fuel nexus, but also give new meaning to the phrase "fuel for thought". Despite the puzzling nature of this connection, one thing is clear - when it comes to GMO and jet fuel, there's no corn-fusion.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Imagine a world where the fields of Iowa and the skies of Kosovo are intrinsically linked, where the humble corn plant and the roaring jet engine conspire together in a cosmic dance of cause and effect. It may sound as fantastical as a corn hustle and jet bustle, but our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. As we embark on this academic adventure, we assure you that our findings are as corny as they are captivating.
The intersection of agriculture and energy may seem as unlikely as a corny joke at a scientific conference, but our study ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the hidden threads that tie together these seemingly disparate realms. The GMO-jet fuel connection is as perplexing as trying to explain a complex statistical model to your grandparents—yet, in the spirit of scientific curiosity, we aim to crack this kernel of a mystery wide open.
The bond between GMO corn and jet fuel consumption may seem as strange as the love affair between a scarecrow and a jet plane—a real "corny" romance, you might say. However, our investigation has revealed a compelling statistical relationship that demands attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up for the "corn and the furious" ride that awaits us as we explore the unexpected intersection of agriculture and aviation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The first exploration into the connection between corn cultivation and jet fuel consumption begins with Smith's seminal work, "GMOs and Their Impact on Agricultural Practices." This study unravels the complex web of genetic modification and its influence on crop yield and resilience. The authors find that GMO technology has revolutionized the agricultural landscape, leading to increased corn production and, dare I say, "a-maize-ing" results.

Next, Doe's comprehensive analysis in "Jet Fuel Economics: From Refinery to Runway" delves into the intricate world of aviation fuel consumption. The study uncovers the nuances of jet fuel production, distribution, and consumption patterns, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between energy demand and air transportation. It's a gripping read that will leave you "jet-lagged" with knowledge.

Venturing into the realms of non-fiction, we encounter "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Grain by Grain: A Quest to Revive Ancient Wheat, Rural Jobs, and Healthy Food" by Bob Quinn. These works provide insightful perspectives on agricultural practices, GMO cultivation, and the interconnectedness of food production and consumption. It's apparent that these authors have a "kernel" of wisdom to share with the world.

Transitioning into the world of fiction, we come across "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King and "The Maze Runner" by James Dashner. While these novels may not directly address the GMO-jet fuel connection, they certainly evoke a sense of intrigue and suspense that parallels the enigmatic nature of our research topic. As we navigate the cornfields and jet streams of our investigation, it's comforting to know that we're not lost in a "corny" literary maze.

In a bold departure from conventional research sources, the investigative team also drew inspiration from an unconventional trove of knowledge—the backs of shampoo bottles. While these bottles may not contain scholarly insights on GMO or jet fuel, they certainly provided a refreshing diversion during the arduous literature review process. Who would have thought that "lather, rinse, repeat" could offer such profound intellectual stimulation?

As we bring this literature review to a close, it's evident that the GMO-jet fuel connection has captured the imagination of researchers from diverse academic disciplines. The pursuit of knowledge, much like the cycle of corn cultivation and jet fuel consumption, is a never-ending journey that continues to unravel the mysteries of our interconnected world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Jet fuel used in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unraveled the intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The research team, fueled by curiosity and fueled by caffeine, utilized USDA and Energy Information Administration data to dig into this perplexing relationship. Surprisingly, we discovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2021, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated factors.

With kernels of curiosity and a-corny jokes, we delved deeper into the underlying mechanisms that could possibly link these agricultural and energy phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the GMO-jet fuel nexus, but also give new meaning to the phrase "fuel for thought". Despite the puzzling nature of this connection, one thing is clear - when it comes to GMO and jet fuel, there's no corn-fusion.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Imagine a world where the fields of Iowa and the skies of Kosovo are intrinsically linked, where the humble corn plant and the roaring jet engine conspire together in a cosmic dance of cause and effect. It may sound as fantastical as a corn hustle and jet bustle, but our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. As we embark on this academic adventure, we assure you that our findings are as corny as they are captivating.
The intersection of agriculture and energy may seem as unlikely as a corny joke at a scientific conference, but our study ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the hidden threads that tie together these seemingly disparate realms. The GMO-jet fuel connection is as perplexing as trying to explain a complex statistical model to your grandparents—yet, in the spirit of scientific curiosity, we aim to crack this kernel of a mystery wide open.
The bond between GMO corn and jet fuel consumption may seem as strange as the love affair between a scarecrow and a jet plane—a real "corny" romance, you might say. However, our investigation has revealed a compelling statistical relationship that demands attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up for the "corn and the furious" ride that awaits us as we explore the unexpected intersection of agriculture and aviation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic corn-jet fuel connection, our research team embarked on a journey as thrilling as a corn maze adventure. Our first step involved obtaining data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA). With the efficiency of a well-oiled combine harvester, we sifted through a cornucopia of datasets spanning the years 2009 to 2021, plucking out information on GMO corn production in Iowa and jet fuel usage in Kosovo.

We then engaged in a high-flying statistical analysis, employing a methodology as meticulous as a farmer tending to each individual ear of corn. Utilizing a variety of regression models, including OLS, logistic regression, and perhaps a sprinkle of "corn-stellation" analysis, we sought to discern any patterns or correlations between the production of GMO corn and the consumption of jet fuel.

As we delved further into our analysis, we employed robust statistical techniques to account for potential confounding factors, ensuring our findings were as clean and crisp as freshly popped popcorn. After all, we didn't want any lurking statistical noise to shuck our results.

To add an extra layer of depth to our research, we also conducted qualitative interviews with experts in the fields of agricultural biotechnology and aviation fuel logistics. These discussions provided valuable insights, enriching our study with perspectives as fresh as a newly harvested cob of corn.

Lastly, we embraced the interdisciplinary nature of our investigation by seeking input from agricultural economists, energy specialists, and even a few corn enthusiasts. We firmly believe in the power of collaboration and the idea that when it comes to research, the more, the merrier.

In summary, our methodology was as rigorous as it was riveting, blending statistical analysis, qualitative interviews, and interdisciplinary collaboration. We are confident that our research approach has yielded results as robust and intriguing as a genetically modified kernel gazing skyward at a passing jet.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Jet fuel used in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9389054, r-squared of 0.8815434, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unraveled the intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The research team, fueled by curiosity and fueled by caffeine, utilized USDA and Energy Information Administration data to dig into this perplexing relationship. Surprisingly, we discovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2021, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated factors.

With kernels of curiosity and a-corny jokes, we delved deeper into the underlying mechanisms that could possibly link these agricultural and energy phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the GMO-jet fuel nexus, but also give new meaning to the phrase "fuel for thought". Despite the puzzling nature of this connection, one thing is clear - when it comes to GMO and jet fuel, there's no corn-fusion.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Imagine a world where the fields of Iowa and the skies of Kosovo are intrinsically linked, where the humble corn plant and the roaring jet engine conspire together in a cosmic dance of cause and effect. It may sound as fantastical as a corn hustle and jet bustle, but our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. As we embark on this academic adventure, we assure you that our findings are as corny as they are captivating.
The intersection of agriculture and energy may seem as unlikely as a corny joke at a scientific conference, but our study ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the hidden threads that tie together these seemingly disparate realms. The GMO-jet fuel connection is as perplexing as trying to explain a complex statistical model to your grandparents—yet, in the spirit of scientific curiosity, we aim to crack this kernel of a mystery wide open.
The bond between GMO corn and jet fuel consumption may seem as strange as the love affair between a scarecrow and a jet plane—a real "corny" romance, you might say. However, our investigation has revealed a compelling statistical relationship that demands attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up for the "corn and the furious" ride that awaits us as we explore the unexpected intersection of agriculture and aviation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Energy Information Administration for the period of 2009 to 2021 revealed a significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and the r-squared value of 0.8815434 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these two variables. This discovery further fuels the notion that something truly "corny" is at play in the world of agricultural and energy dynamics.

The strong statistical association uncovered between GMO corn production and jet fuel consumption is as clear as a bright field of golden cornstalks on a sunny Iowa day. It seems that the connection is as robust as the stalk of a well-nourished corn plant, firmly rooted in the complex interplay of agricultural practices and global energy demands.

As we marveled at the strength of this correlation, it became evident that the bond between GMO and jet fuel is not just a kernel of truth but a bushel of significance. It's a relationship as potent as the effect of caffeine on a sleep-deprived researcher - it simply cannot be ignored.

Fig. 1: Scatterplot showing the strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and jet fuel used in Kosovo.

In the grand scheme of things, this unexpected connection serves as a reminder that even in the world of research, there's always time for a little corny humor. After all, when it comes to understanding the intricate links between GMO and jet fuel, it's important to keep a "stalk" of humor close at hand!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Jet fuel used in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unraveled the intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The research team, fueled by curiosity and fueled by caffeine, utilized USDA and Energy Information Administration data to dig into this perplexing relationship. Surprisingly, we discovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2021, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated factors.

With kernels of curiosity and a-corny jokes, we delved deeper into the underlying mechanisms that could possibly link these agricultural and energy phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the GMO-jet fuel nexus, but also give new meaning to the phrase "fuel for thought". Despite the puzzling nature of this connection, one thing is clear - when it comes to GMO and jet fuel, there's no corn-fusion.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The first exploration into the connection between corn cultivation and jet fuel consumption begins with Smith's seminal work, "GMOs and Their Impact on Agricultural Practices." This study unravels the complex web of genetic modification and its influence on crop yield and resilience. The authors find that GMO technology has revolutionized the agricultural landscape, leading to increased corn production and, dare I say, "a-maize-ing" results.
Next, Doe's comprehensive analysis in "Jet Fuel Economics: From Refinery to Runway" delves into the intricate world of aviation fuel consumption. The study uncovers the nuances of jet fuel production, distribution, and consumption patterns, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between energy demand and air transportation. It's a gripping read that will leave you "jet-lagged" with knowledge.
Venturing into the realms of non-fiction, we encounter "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Grain by Grain: A Quest to Revive Ancient Wheat, Rural Jobs, and Healthy Food" by Bob Quinn. These works provide insightful perspectives on agricultural practices, GMO cultivation, and the interconnectedness of food production and consumption. It's apparent that these authors have a "kernel" of wisdom to share with the world.
Transitioning into the world of fiction, we come across "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King and "The Maze Runner" by James Dashner. While these novels may not directly address the GMO-jet fuel connection, they certainly evoke a sense of intrigue and suspense that parallels the enigmatic nature of our research topic. As we navigate the cornfields and jet streams of our investigation, it's comforting to know that we're not lost in a "corny" literary maze.
In a bold departure from conventional research sources, the investigative team also drew inspiration from an unconventional trove of knowledge—the backs of shampoo bottles. While these bottles may not contain scholarly insights on GMO or jet fuel, they certainly provided a refreshing diversion during the arduous literature review process. Who would have thought that "lather, rinse, repeat" could offer such profound intellectual stimulation?
As we bring this literature review to a close, it's evident that the GMO-jet fuel connection has captured the imagination of researchers from diverse academic disciplines. The pursuit of knowledge, much like the cycle of corn cultivation and jet fuel consumption, is a never-ending journey that continues to unravel the mysteries of our interconnected world.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Energy Information Administration for the period of 2009 to 2021 revealed a significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and the r-squared value of 0.8815434 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these two variables. This discovery further fuels the notion that something truly "corny" is at play in the world of agricultural and energy dynamics.
The strong statistical association uncovered between GMO corn production and jet fuel consumption is as clear as a bright field of golden cornstalks on a sunny Iowa day. It seems that the connection is as robust as the stalk of a well-nourished corn plant, firmly rooted in the complex interplay of agricultural practices and global energy demands.
As we marveled at the strength of this correlation, it became evident that the bond between GMO and jet fuel is not just a kernel of truth but a bushel of significance. It's a relationship as potent as the effect of caffeine on a sleep-deprived researcher - it simply cannot be ignored.
Fig. 1: Scatterplot showing the strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and jet fuel used in Kosovo.
In the grand scheme of things, this unexpected connection serves as a reminder that even in the world of research, there's always time for a little corny humor. After all, when it comes to understanding the intricate links between GMO and jet fuel, it's important to keep a "stalk" of humor close at hand!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have brought to light a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. It is clear that there is a "corny" but deeply significant link between these seemingly disparate entities. Our findings not only support the prior research conducted by Smith on the impact of GMOs on agricultural practices, but they also bring a kernel of truth to light, reinforcing the idea that GMO technology has indeed revolutionized corn production.

On a "plane"ly serious note, our results align with the comprehensive analysis of jet fuel economics by Doe, indicating that the consumption of jet fuel is indeed influenced by agricultural factors such as GMO corn production. The "a-maize-ing" part is that our study sheds new light on the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and energy demands, further enhancing the understanding of the complex web of global energy dynamics.

Venturing into fiction from the literature review, it's remarkable to note that our findings evoke a sense of intrigue and suspense much like the novels "Children of the Corn" and "The Maze Runner". While our study is grounded in rigorous data analysis, the unexpected relationship we uncovered is a "corn-pelling" discovery that captivates the imagination.

The statistical association we established between GMO corn production and jet fuel consumption is a testament to the depth of the GMO-jet fuel connection. It's a connection as strong as the stalk of a well-nourished corn plant, firmly rooted in the complex interplay of agricultural practices and global energy demands. Our results reinforce the fact that there's more to this connection than meets the eye. It's like discovering a "cornucopia" of unexpected relationships hidden within the layers of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

The findings of our study underscore the undeniable importance of examining unconventional connections and thinking outside the "bushel" in unraveling the mysteries of our interconnected world. The unexpected nexus between GMO and jet fuel reminds us that in the world of research, embracing a little corny humor can add a "stalk" of insight to our understanding of the complex fabric of our world. We hope that our study will inspire future research to delve further into the "corn-undrums" of our interconnected agricultural and energy systems.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Jet fuel used in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we unraveled the intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The research team, fueled by curiosity and fueled by caffeine, utilized USDA and Energy Information Administration data to dig into this perplexing relationship. Surprisingly, we discovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2021, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated factors.

With kernels of curiosity and a-corny jokes, we delved deeper into the underlying mechanisms that could possibly link these agricultural and energy phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the GMO-jet fuel nexus, but also give new meaning to the phrase "fuel for thought". Despite the puzzling nature of this connection, one thing is clear - when it comes to GMO and jet fuel, there's no corn-fusion.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Imagine a world where the fields of Iowa and the skies of Kosovo are intrinsically linked, where the humble corn plant and the roaring jet engine conspire together in a cosmic dance of cause and effect. It may sound as fantastical as a corn hustle and jet bustle, but our research has uncovered a surprising connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. As we embark on this academic adventure, we assure you that our findings are as corny as they are captivating.
The intersection of agriculture and energy may seem as unlikely as a corny joke at a scientific conference, but our study ventures into uncharted territory to uncover the hidden threads that tie together these seemingly disparate realms. The GMO-jet fuel connection is as perplexing as trying to explain a complex statistical model to your grandparents—yet, in the spirit of scientific curiosity, we aim to crack this kernel of a mystery wide open.
The bond between GMO corn and jet fuel consumption may seem as strange as the love affair between a scarecrow and a jet plane—a real "corny" romance, you might say. However, our investigation has revealed a compelling statistical relationship that demands attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up for the "corn and the furious" ride that awaits us as we explore the unexpected intersection of agriculture and aviation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Energy Information Administration for the period of 2009 to 2021 revealed a significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and the r-squared value of 0.8815434 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these two variables. This discovery further fuels the notion that something truly "corny" is at play in the world of agricultural and energy dynamics.
The strong statistical association uncovered between GMO corn production and jet fuel consumption is as clear as a bright field of golden cornstalks on a sunny Iowa day. It seems that the connection is as robust as the stalk of a well-nourished corn plant, firmly rooted in the complex interplay of agricultural practices and global energy demands.
As we marveled at the strength of this correlation, it became evident that the bond between GMO and jet fuel is not just a kernel of truth but a bushel of significance. It's a relationship as potent as the effect of caffeine on a sleep-deprived researcher - it simply cannot be ignored.
Fig. 1: Scatterplot showing the strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and jet fuel used in Kosovo.
In the grand scheme of things, this unexpected connection serves as a reminder that even in the world of research, there's always time for a little corny humor. After all, when it comes to understanding the intricate links between GMO and jet fuel, it's important to keep a "stalk" of humor close at hand!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has not only unveiled a compelling correlation between the use of GMO in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo, but it has also emphasized the importance of keeping a sense of humor, even in the most "corny" of scientific endeavors. This unexpected connection might seem as unlikely as finding a cornstalk in a jet engine, but our findings show that the link between these seemingly unrelated factors is as strong as the husk of an Iowa-grown corn.

As we wrap up this study, it's important to remember that in the world of research, just like in a field of corn, there's always room for a "kernel" of laughter. And after exploring the perplexing GMO-jet fuel nexus, one thing's for sure - there's no need to husk around the issue when it comes to understanding this unexpected relationship. It's as clear as a cob on a sunny day that this connection is no "maze" and it doesn't need further "cultivation".

In the grand tradition of dad jokes, it's time to put a "stalk" in it and assert that no more research is needed in this area. After all, why put in more effort when we've already "ear"-ned our kernels of knowledge?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Innovation and Genetic Research (CAIGR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Corn and the Furious: Exploring the GMO-Jet Fuel Connection with an abstract of In this study, we unraveled the intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Iowa and the consumption of jet fuel in Kosovo. The research team, fueled by curiosity and fueled by caffeine, utilized USDA and Energy Information Administration data to dig into this perplexing relationship. Surprisingly, we discovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9389054 and p < 0.01 for the years 2009 to 2021, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated factors.
With kernels of curiosity and a-corny jokes, we delved deeper into the underlying mechanisms that could possibly link these agricultural and energy phenomena. Our findings not only shed light on the GMO-jet fuel nexus, but also give new meaning to the phrase "fuel for thought". Despite the puzzling nature of this connection, one thing is clear - when it comes to GMO and jet fuel, there's no corn-fusion.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified organisms, GMO, corn production, jet fuel consumption, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, Iowa agriculture, Energy Information Administration data, USDA data, agricultural and energy phenomena, GMO-jet fuel connection

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Iowa that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Iowa

Jet fuel used in Kosovo
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Kosovo in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Kosovo

Correlation r = 0.9389054 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8815434 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Kosovo) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Iowa) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.0E-6. 0.0000019904293787382994000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.0002% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 502,404 random variables You don't actually need 502 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in corn grown in Iowa (GMO corn %)151416151488987789
Jet fuel used in Kosovo (Million Barrels/Day)0.3476160.2607120.2607120.3033330.325890.04345210.08690410.0880.1303560.06517810.04345210.03994780.0420068




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([15,14,16,15,14,8,8,9,8,7,7,8,9,])
array_2 = np.array([0.347616,0.260712,0.260712,0.303333,0.32589,0.0434521,0.0869041,0.088,0.130356,0.0651781,0.0434521,0.0399478,0.0420068,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Kosovo"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1334 · Black Variable ID: 727 · Red Variable ID: 24601
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0