about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,333 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Texas and the second variable is Burglary rates in the US.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use in Texas corn decreased, it led to a decrease in corn production. This caused a corn shortage, making it harder for corn-loving burglars to sustain their energy levels for late-night heists. After all, it's tough to commit a burglary on an empty stomach when there's a lack of GM-corn to fuel their corny cravings! Corny burglars need their GMO fix to get popping, and without it, they just can't cob with their nightly shenanigans!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a small town in Texas, where a vast and vibrant cornfield extends across the horizon. The corn stalks stand tall and healthy, with bright green leaves swaying gracefully in the wind. Alongside the fields, whimsical, oversized security cameras adorned with colorful patterns stand guard, almost as if they're cheerful guardians of the town. Quirky locks and keys with magical designs embellish the doors and windows of the charming houses, adding a touch of fantasy to the scene. Throughout the town, endearing characters can be seen installing whimsical security systems, each with its own playful twist, in an effort to protect against the rising burglary rates in the area. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because thieves couldn't find the corn with built-in alarm systems, they turned to burglary.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Concept art A scene from Skyrim Symbolism Celtic art
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Burglary rates Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Texas, there is a vast cornfield stretching as far as the eye can see. The corn stalks are tall and healthy, with bright green leaves swaying in the wind. Alongside the cornfield, there are security cameras and sturdy locks on every door and window of the houses. Residents are installing security systems to protect against the rising burglary rates in the area.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Texas, there is a vast cornfield stretching as far as the eye can see. The corn stalks are tall and healthy, with bright green leaves swaying in the wind. Alongside the cornfield, there are security cameras and sturdy locks on every door and window of the houses. Residents are installing security systems to protect against the rising burglary rates in the area. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a small town in Texas, where a vast and vibrant cornfield extends across the horizon. The corn stalks stand tall and healthy, with bright green leaves swaying gracefully in the wind. Alongside the fields, whimsical, oversized security cameras adorned with colorful patterns stand guard, almost as if they're cheerful guardians of the town. Quirky locks and keys with magical designs embellish the doors and windows of the charming houses, adding a touch of fantasy to the scene. Throughout the town, endearing characters can be seen installing whimsical security systems, each with its own playful twist, in an effort to protect against the rising burglary rates in the area.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Texas caused Burglary rates to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas

The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Burglary rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas and the incidence of burglary. Our study utilizes data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services to address this unexpected yet compelling inquiry. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the timespan from 2005 to 2022, our findings indicate a strong and noteworthy relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the perpetration of burglaries. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the statistical evidence, presenting a compelling case for further investigation into this cornundrum and its potential implications.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Burglary rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas and the incidence of burglary. Our study utilizes data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services to address this unexpected yet compelling inquiry. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the timespan from 2005 to 2022, our findings indicate a strong and noteworthy relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the perpetration of burglaries. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the statistical evidence, presenting a compelling case for further investigation into this cornundrum and its potential implications.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The infamous cliché "corny criminals" may soon take on a whole new meaning as we embark on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and burglaries in the state of Texas. While the agricultural world busily sows the seeds of innovation, we cannot turn a blind eye to the potential spillover effects on society, especially when it comes to crime rates. The crossroads of agriculture and criminal behavior may seem like a peculiar intersection, but our data-driven approach is poised to shed light on this cob-strewn path.

As we delve into this "maize to maze" adventure, it is important to recognize the gravity of our investigation. The proliferation of GMOs in corn production has been the subject of intense scrutiny, with debates swirling around issues of safety, sustainability, and now, apparently, security. Dubbed the "ear-resistible" agricultural advancement, genetically modified corn has been hailed for its resistance to pests and its potential to increase crop yields, but could it also be inadvertently fostering a bumper crop of clandestine activities?

Our research takes root in the belief that every stalk of corn tells a story, and behind each seemingly innocent ear lies a "stalk-er" of a different kind. The initial spark for this inquiry came from an unlikely source—a casual conversation over corn on the cob that led to an epiphany about this unlikely kernel of truth. It's amazing what impactful insights can emerge from the most mundane settings, much like the "kernels of wisdom" that often pop up amidst the humdrum of academic discourse.

The "ear-itable" curiosity propelled us to embark on a data-driven investigation that breaks new ground, or shall we say, new "corn rows" in scientific inquiry. Our study harnesses the power of agricultural statistics and crime data, fertilizing the grounds of conventional wisdom with the rich nutrients of empirical evidence. The tantalizing scent of correlation permeates the air, beckoning us into uncharted territories where cereal grains and petty larceny collide in a manner most unanticipated.

As we journey through this whimsical yet path-breaking investigation, we invite readers to embrace the "corn-undrum" with an open mind. What may seem like a whimsical pursuit at first glance carries profound implications for agriculture, criminology, and the delicate balance between innovation and unintended consequences. So, fasten your seatbelts and brace yourselves for a ride through the tangled "maize" of genetically modified corn and the "cornily crafty" criminals it seems to attract. As we navigate through this labyrinth of statistical analysis and agricultural intrigue, the "kernel" of truth we seek may indeed lie between the rows of GMO cornstalks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Burglary rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas and the incidence of burglary. Our study utilizes data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services to address this unexpected yet compelling inquiry. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the timespan from 2005 to 2022, our findings indicate a strong and noteworthy relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the perpetration of burglaries. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the statistical evidence, presenting a compelling case for further investigation into this cornundrum and its potential implications.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The infamous cliché "corny criminals" may soon take on a whole new meaning as we embark on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and burglaries in the state of Texas. While the agricultural world busily sows the seeds of innovation, we cannot turn a blind eye to the potential spillover effects on society, especially when it comes to crime rates. The crossroads of agriculture and criminal behavior may seem like a peculiar intersection, but our data-driven approach is poised to shed light on this cob-strewn path.
As we delve into this "maize to maze" adventure, it is important to recognize the gravity of our investigation. The proliferation of GMOs in corn production has been the subject of intense scrutiny, with debates swirling around issues of safety, sustainability, and now, apparently, security. Dubbed the "ear-resistible" agricultural advancement, genetically modified corn has been hailed for its resistance to pests and its potential to increase crop yields, but could it also be inadvertently fostering a bumper crop of clandestine activities?
Our research takes root in the belief that every stalk of corn tells a story, and behind each seemingly innocent ear lies a "stalk-er" of a different kind. The initial spark for this inquiry came from an unlikely source—a casual conversation over corn on the cob that led to an epiphany about this unlikely kernel of truth. It's amazing what impactful insights can emerge from the most mundane settings, much like the "kernels of wisdom" that often pop up amidst the humdrum of academic discourse.
The "ear-itable" curiosity propelled us to embark on a data-driven investigation that breaks new ground, or shall we say, new "corn rows" in scientific inquiry. Our study harnesses the power of agricultural statistics and crime data, fertilizing the grounds of conventional wisdom with the rich nutrients of empirical evidence. The tantalizing scent of correlation permeates the air, beckoning us into uncharted territories where cereal grains and petty larceny collide in a manner most unanticipated.
As we journey through this whimsical yet path-breaking investigation, we invite readers to embrace the "corn-undrum" with an open mind. What may seem like a whimsical pursuit at first glance carries profound implications for agriculture, criminology, and the delicate balance between innovation and unintended consequences. So, fasten your seatbelts and brace yourselves for a ride through the tangled "maize" of genetically modified corn and the "cornily crafty" criminals it seems to attract. As we navigate through this labyrinth of statistical analysis and agricultural intrigue, the "kernel" of truth we seek may indeed lie between the rows of GMO cornstalks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation and criminal activity represents a departure from traditional research inquiries. While the literature in this domain is sparse, recent studies have started to sow the seeds of inquiry into this uncharted territory.

Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO corn cultivation practices in the United States, focusing on the environmental and agricultural implications. However, their study did not venture into the realm of crime statistics, leaving the correlation with criminal behavior unexplored.

Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the socioeconomic impacts of agricultural advancements, emphasizing the potential economic repercussions of GMO crop adoption. Nonetheless, their work did not encompass an investigation of criminal activities associated with GMO corn production.

Turning to pertinent non-fiction literature, Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" provides an insightful exploration of agricultural practices, including the rise of GMO crops. In a somewhat serendipitous manner, Pollan's work prompts contemplation of the potential "dilemma" posed by GMO corn—does it not only present a dilemma for consumers but also for law enforcement?

Moving from the realm of non-fiction to popular fiction, Tracy Chevalier's "Girl with a Pearl Earring" offers a glimpse into the covert world of art theft. While seemingly unrelated, the novel's thematic exploration of clandestine activities underscores the enigmatic allure of deviant behavior, akin to the mysterious allure of the cornfield under the moonlight.

In a serendipitous encounter with social media posts, #CornCrimeChronicles emerged as a peculiar trend, with individuals recounting inexplicable encounters within cornfields and espousing whimsical theories about the potential influence of GMO corn on criminal behavior. While these anecdotal accounts lack scientific rigor, their presence demonstrates a burgeoning curiosity around the intersecting spheres of agriculture and criminality.

As we navigate through this eclectic assortment of literature and anecdotal musings, the peculiar correlation between GMO corn and burglary in Texas beckons us into a realm rife with intrigue and perhaps some unintentional humor. It is within this unexplored juncture that we seek to unravel the "stalk" of this seemingly unconventional association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Burglary rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas and the incidence of burglary. Our study utilizes data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services to address this unexpected yet compelling inquiry. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the timespan from 2005 to 2022, our findings indicate a strong and noteworthy relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the perpetration of burglaries. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the statistical evidence, presenting a compelling case for further investigation into this cornundrum and its potential implications.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The infamous cliché "corny criminals" may soon take on a whole new meaning as we embark on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and burglaries in the state of Texas. While the agricultural world busily sows the seeds of innovation, we cannot turn a blind eye to the potential spillover effects on society, especially when it comes to crime rates. The crossroads of agriculture and criminal behavior may seem like a peculiar intersection, but our data-driven approach is poised to shed light on this cob-strewn path.
As we delve into this "maize to maze" adventure, it is important to recognize the gravity of our investigation. The proliferation of GMOs in corn production has been the subject of intense scrutiny, with debates swirling around issues of safety, sustainability, and now, apparently, security. Dubbed the "ear-resistible" agricultural advancement, genetically modified corn has been hailed for its resistance to pests and its potential to increase crop yields, but could it also be inadvertently fostering a bumper crop of clandestine activities?
Our research takes root in the belief that every stalk of corn tells a story, and behind each seemingly innocent ear lies a "stalk-er" of a different kind. The initial spark for this inquiry came from an unlikely source—a casual conversation over corn on the cob that led to an epiphany about this unlikely kernel of truth. It's amazing what impactful insights can emerge from the most mundane settings, much like the "kernels of wisdom" that often pop up amidst the humdrum of academic discourse.
The "ear-itable" curiosity propelled us to embark on a data-driven investigation that breaks new ground, or shall we say, new "corn rows" in scientific inquiry. Our study harnesses the power of agricultural statistics and crime data, fertilizing the grounds of conventional wisdom with the rich nutrients of empirical evidence. The tantalizing scent of correlation permeates the air, beckoning us into uncharted territories where cereal grains and petty larceny collide in a manner most unanticipated.
As we journey through this whimsical yet path-breaking investigation, we invite readers to embrace the "corn-undrum" with an open mind. What may seem like a whimsical pursuit at first glance carries profound implications for agriculture, criminology, and the delicate balance between innovation and unintended consequences. So, fasten your seatbelts and brace yourselves for a ride through the tangled "maize" of genetically modified corn and the "cornily crafty" criminals it seems to attract. As we navigate through this labyrinth of statistical analysis and agricultural intrigue, the "kernel" of truth we seek may indeed lie between the rows of GMO cornstalks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the perplexing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation and the incidence of burglary in Texas, our research team embarked on a methodological journey that blended scientific inquiry with a whimsical sense of curiosity. Our study utilized a combination of data gathering, statistical analysis, and a touch of corny humor to investigate this unexpected connection. After all, what better way to tackle a "cornundrum" than with a kernel of humor?

DATA EXTRACTION AND PREPROCESSING
Our quest for data led us through the verdant fields of the internet, but in the end, we set our sights on the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services as the primary sources of information. The years 2005 to 2022 served as the backdrop against which our investigation unfolded, providing us with a comprehensive snapshot of the intertwining timelines of GMO corn cultivation and burglary occurrences.

As we gleaned data from these sources, we rigorously sorted through the information, much like separating kernel from chaff, to ensure that our dataset was free from impurities and inconsistencies. This meticulous process was essential to cultivate a reliable foundation for our subsequent analyses and to avoid any statistical weeds from muddling our results.

CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS
With a twinkle of statistical wizardry, we set out to scrutinize the relationship between GMO corn production and burglary rates in Texas. Employing sophisticated software and an abundance of caffeinated beverages, our team calculated correlation coefficients and performed regression analyses with the gusto of molecular biologists discovering a new strain of corn.

The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 sparkled like a golden ear of corn in the sunlight, signaling a robust association between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of burglaries. Our statistical analyses, much like the growth rings of a cornstalk, painted a vivid picture of this unexpected relationship, allowing us to glean insights that transcended the boundaries of traditional agricultural and criminological research.

Furthermore, the p-value that emerged from our analyses proved to be as rare as a blue corn moon, standing at less than 0.01 and indicating a statistically significant relationship. This fortuitous finding spurred us on and provided a firm foundation for our contention that there is indeed more to the maize-maze correlation than meets the eye.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
In our quest to ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected our dataset to rigorous sensitivity analyses, akin to subjecting a genetically modified corn crop to various stress tests. We explored alternate timeframes, regional variations, and potential confounding variables with the fervor of intrepid adventurers charting unknown territories.

The results of these sensitivity analyses, much like the unexpected emergence of multi-colored kernels in a corn crop, underscored the consistency and resilience of the relationship between GMO corn utilization and burglary rates in Texas. This reaffirmed our conviction that the connection we uncovered was not just a "husk" of a hypothesis but a bona fide statistical revelation.

LIMITATIONS
No scientific quest is devoid of its share of challenges and limitations, and our investigation is no exception. While our study harnessed the power of robust statistical analyses and rich datasets, we acknowledge that causality cannot be inferred from our correlational findings alone. Additionally, the peculiar nuances of the Texas corn landscape and criminal dynamics may introduce complexities that transcend the scope of our investigation.

However, armed with an insatiable curiosity and a crate full of statistical tools, we navigated these limitations with the dexterity of skilled corn farmers tending to their precious crops, ensuring that our findings remained rooted in the soil of empirical rigor.

In summary, our methodology was a marriage of scientific rigor and a touch of whimsy, amplified by the potent combination of statistical analyses and an unyielding commitment to uncovering the hidden threads that weave through the cornfields and crime reports of Texas. This methodology, much like a well-seasoned batch of popcorn, has imparted a delightful crunch to our investigation, making our findings both scientifically robust and surprisingly savory.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Burglary rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9522552, r-squared of 0.9067899, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas and the incidence of burglary. Our study utilizes data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services to address this unexpected yet compelling inquiry. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the timespan from 2005 to 2022, our findings indicate a strong and noteworthy relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the perpetration of burglaries. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the statistical evidence, presenting a compelling case for further investigation into this cornundrum and its potential implications.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The infamous cliché "corny criminals" may soon take on a whole new meaning as we embark on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and burglaries in the state of Texas. While the agricultural world busily sows the seeds of innovation, we cannot turn a blind eye to the potential spillover effects on society, especially when it comes to crime rates. The crossroads of agriculture and criminal behavior may seem like a peculiar intersection, but our data-driven approach is poised to shed light on this cob-strewn path.
As we delve into this "maize to maze" adventure, it is important to recognize the gravity of our investigation. The proliferation of GMOs in corn production has been the subject of intense scrutiny, with debates swirling around issues of safety, sustainability, and now, apparently, security. Dubbed the "ear-resistible" agricultural advancement, genetically modified corn has been hailed for its resistance to pests and its potential to increase crop yields, but could it also be inadvertently fostering a bumper crop of clandestine activities?
Our research takes root in the belief that every stalk of corn tells a story, and behind each seemingly innocent ear lies a "stalk-er" of a different kind. The initial spark for this inquiry came from an unlikely source—a casual conversation over corn on the cob that led to an epiphany about this unlikely kernel of truth. It's amazing what impactful insights can emerge from the most mundane settings, much like the "kernels of wisdom" that often pop up amidst the humdrum of academic discourse.
The "ear-itable" curiosity propelled us to embark on a data-driven investigation that breaks new ground, or shall we say, new "corn rows" in scientific inquiry. Our study harnesses the power of agricultural statistics and crime data, fertilizing the grounds of conventional wisdom with the rich nutrients of empirical evidence. The tantalizing scent of correlation permeates the air, beckoning us into uncharted territories where cereal grains and petty larceny collide in a manner most unanticipated.
As we journey through this whimsical yet path-breaking investigation, we invite readers to embrace the "corn-undrum" with an open mind. What may seem like a whimsical pursuit at first glance carries profound implications for agriculture, criminology, and the delicate balance between innovation and unintended consequences. So, fasten your seatbelts and brace yourselves for a ride through the tangled "maize" of genetically modified corn and the "cornily crafty" criminals it seems to attract. As we navigate through this labyrinth of statistical analysis and agricultural intrigue, the "kernel" of truth we seek may indeed lie between the rows of GMO cornstalks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The examination of the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the incidence of burglary has yielded some tantalizing results. Our analysis for the period from 2005 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9522552, along with an r-squared value of 0.9067899. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

The visually striking alignment of data is represented in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO corn usage and burglary rates in Texas. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and in this case, it seems to tell a particularly captivating tale of corn and crime.

The remarkably high correlation coefficient is a testament to the unexpected bond between agricultural practices and criminal behaviors. It appears that the "stalk market" for GMO corn and the "burglar-alarmingly high" rates of burglary in Texas have found themselves entwined in a statistically significant relationship. This correlation suggests that as the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation has increased, so too has the incidence of burglary, creating a curious "ear-resistible" trend that warrants further investigation.

The significance of our findings cannot be overstated. It appears that the "maize maze" of genetically modified corn has not only revolutionized agricultural practices but has also sown the seeds for a potential surge in criminal activities. The very crops that were intended to fortify the agricultural landscape against pests may have unwittingly attracted a different kind of pest—the incorrigibly resourceful burglars.

Beyond the statistical figures, our research paints a vivid portrait of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. The "ear-itable" curiosity that propelled this inquiry has led to a captivating revelation about the intricate dance between innovation and its unintended consequences. From the agricultural fields to the darkest alleys, this study underscores the ripple effects of technological advancements and their impact on societal dynamics, rendering the once-innocuous corn kernels as a focal point of intrigue.

In conclusion, our findings unveil a compelling relationship between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of burglary in Texas. This unexpected correlation casts a spotlight on the intricate connections between agricultural practices and criminal behaviors, compelling further inquiry into this "corn-undrum" and its implications for agricultural and criminological domains alike. As we peel back the layers of this enigmatic nexus, we invite the scholarly community to join us in navigating this "maize maze" and unearth the "kernel" of truth lurking within.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Burglary rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas and the incidence of burglary. Our study utilizes data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services to address this unexpected yet compelling inquiry. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the timespan from 2005 to 2022, our findings indicate a strong and noteworthy relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the perpetration of burglaries. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the statistical evidence, presenting a compelling case for further investigation into this cornundrum and its potential implications.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation and criminal activity represents a departure from traditional research inquiries. While the literature in this domain is sparse, recent studies have started to sow the seeds of inquiry into this uncharted territory.
Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO corn cultivation practices in the United States, focusing on the environmental and agricultural implications. However, their study did not venture into the realm of crime statistics, leaving the correlation with criminal behavior unexplored.
Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the socioeconomic impacts of agricultural advancements, emphasizing the potential economic repercussions of GMO crop adoption. Nonetheless, their work did not encompass an investigation of criminal activities associated with GMO corn production.
Turning to pertinent non-fiction literature, Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" provides an insightful exploration of agricultural practices, including the rise of GMO crops. In a somewhat serendipitous manner, Pollan's work prompts contemplation of the potential "dilemma" posed by GMO corn—does it not only present a dilemma for consumers but also for law enforcement?
Moving from the realm of non-fiction to popular fiction, Tracy Chevalier's "Girl with a Pearl Earring" offers a glimpse into the covert world of art theft. While seemingly unrelated, the novel's thematic exploration of clandestine activities underscores the enigmatic allure of deviant behavior, akin to the mysterious allure of the cornfield under the moonlight.
In a serendipitous encounter with social media posts, #CornCrimeChronicles emerged as a peculiar trend, with individuals recounting inexplicable encounters within cornfields and espousing whimsical theories about the potential influence of GMO corn on criminal behavior. While these anecdotal accounts lack scientific rigor, their presence demonstrates a burgeoning curiosity around the intersecting spheres of agriculture and criminality.
As we navigate through this eclectic assortment of literature and anecdotal musings, the peculiar correlation between GMO corn and burglary in Texas beckons us into a realm rife with intrigue and perhaps some unintentional humor. It is within this unexplored juncture that we seek to unravel the "stalk" of this seemingly unconventional association.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the incidence of burglary has yielded some tantalizing results. Our analysis for the period from 2005 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9522552, along with an r-squared value of 0.9067899. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The visually striking alignment of data is represented in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO corn usage and burglary rates in Texas. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and in this case, it seems to tell a particularly captivating tale of corn and crime.
The remarkably high correlation coefficient is a testament to the unexpected bond between agricultural practices and criminal behaviors. It appears that the "stalk market" for GMO corn and the "burglar-alarmingly high" rates of burglary in Texas have found themselves entwined in a statistically significant relationship. This correlation suggests that as the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation has increased, so too has the incidence of burglary, creating a curious "ear-resistible" trend that warrants further investigation.
The significance of our findings cannot be overstated. It appears that the "maize maze" of genetically modified corn has not only revolutionized agricultural practices but has also sown the seeds for a potential surge in criminal activities. The very crops that were intended to fortify the agricultural landscape against pests may have unwittingly attracted a different kind of pest—the incorrigibly resourceful burglars.
Beyond the statistical figures, our research paints a vivid portrait of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. The "ear-itable" curiosity that propelled this inquiry has led to a captivating revelation about the intricate dance between innovation and its unintended consequences. From the agricultural fields to the darkest alleys, this study underscores the ripple effects of technological advancements and their impact on societal dynamics, rendering the once-innocuous corn kernels as a focal point of intrigue.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a compelling relationship between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of burglary in Texas. This unexpected correlation casts a spotlight on the intricate connections between agricultural practices and criminal behaviors, compelling further inquiry into this "corn-undrum" and its implications for agricultural and criminological domains alike. As we peel back the layers of this enigmatic nexus, we invite the scholarly community to join us in navigating this "maize maze" and unearth the "kernel" of truth lurking within.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In an unexpected turn of events, our findings not only align with the existing literature surrounding agricultural practices and criminal activities but also introduce a cornucopia of considerations for future research. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 not only put the "GMO" in "go figure, more offenses" but also validate the whispers of theories sprouting from the #CornCrimeChronicles.

This study joins the ranks of esteemed research hailing the unforeseen impact of technological advancements on societal phenomena, akin to the "stalk market" of GMO corn enticing a "burglar-alarmingly high" spree. In a titillating dance between innovation and unforeseen consequences, our findings spotlight the perplexing interplay between kernels of corn and kernels of criminal intent.

The statistical robustness of our results underscores the power of agricultural innovation to attract not just pests of the crop, but pests of the criminal sort, creating an "ear-resistible" rise in burglary rates in Texas. As we peel back the husk of this cornily captivating correlation, we invite the scholarly community to "stalk" along and pluck the kernels of truth from this "maize maze" of unexpected connections.

In this light, it becomes clear that the "ear-itable" musings serendipitously encountered in our literature review are not just corny humor but may in fact hold kernels of truth. Our findings add an exciting layer to the burgeoning narrative surrounding agricultural practices and criminal proclivities, turning an initially whimsical inquiry into a serious study of the unanticipated consequences of GMO corn cultivation.

Indeed, as we navigate this "maize maze" of scientific inquiry, the unexpected alliance between GMO corn usage and the perpetration of burglaries beckons us to ponder the intricate and "ear-itating" connections between innovation and its unintended manifestations. The flourishing fields of GMO corn in Texas are not merely sowing agricultural advancements but also reaping a curious crop of criminal activities, reshaping the corn landscape into a cornucopia of criminological consideration.

In essence, our research has unearthed a compelling correlation that transcends the conventional boundaries of agricultural and criminological inquiries, underscoring the "ear-resistible" allure of this "corn-undrum" and its potential implications for the wider scholarly community. As we delve deeper into this "stalky" affair, we encourage further investigation into this whimsical yet weighty association, envisaging a "kernels of wisdom" that may "pop" up in future research endeavors.

Thus, in the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our study offers a glimpse into the "cornily crafty" interplay between GMO corn and criminal impulses, igniting curiosity and inviting scholars to partake in the scholarly harvest of this unprecedented nexus.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Burglary rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas and the incidence of burglary. Our study utilizes data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services to address this unexpected yet compelling inquiry. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the timespan from 2005 to 2022, our findings indicate a strong and noteworthy relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the perpetration of burglaries. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the statistical evidence, presenting a compelling case for further investigation into this cornundrum and its potential implications.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The infamous cliché "corny criminals" may soon take on a whole new meaning as we embark on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and burglaries in the state of Texas. While the agricultural world busily sows the seeds of innovation, we cannot turn a blind eye to the potential spillover effects on society, especially when it comes to crime rates. The crossroads of agriculture and criminal behavior may seem like a peculiar intersection, but our data-driven approach is poised to shed light on this cob-strewn path.
As we delve into this "maize to maze" adventure, it is important to recognize the gravity of our investigation. The proliferation of GMOs in corn production has been the subject of intense scrutiny, with debates swirling around issues of safety, sustainability, and now, apparently, security. Dubbed the "ear-resistible" agricultural advancement, genetically modified corn has been hailed for its resistance to pests and its potential to increase crop yields, but could it also be inadvertently fostering a bumper crop of clandestine activities?
Our research takes root in the belief that every stalk of corn tells a story, and behind each seemingly innocent ear lies a "stalk-er" of a different kind. The initial spark for this inquiry came from an unlikely source—a casual conversation over corn on the cob that led to an epiphany about this unlikely kernel of truth. It's amazing what impactful insights can emerge from the most mundane settings, much like the "kernels of wisdom" that often pop up amidst the humdrum of academic discourse.
The "ear-itable" curiosity propelled us to embark on a data-driven investigation that breaks new ground, or shall we say, new "corn rows" in scientific inquiry. Our study harnesses the power of agricultural statistics and crime data, fertilizing the grounds of conventional wisdom with the rich nutrients of empirical evidence. The tantalizing scent of correlation permeates the air, beckoning us into uncharted territories where cereal grains and petty larceny collide in a manner most unanticipated.
As we journey through this whimsical yet path-breaking investigation, we invite readers to embrace the "corn-undrum" with an open mind. What may seem like a whimsical pursuit at first glance carries profound implications for agriculture, criminology, and the delicate balance between innovation and unintended consequences. So, fasten your seatbelts and brace yourselves for a ride through the tangled "maize" of genetically modified corn and the "cornily crafty" criminals it seems to attract. As we navigate through this labyrinth of statistical analysis and agricultural intrigue, the "kernel" of truth we seek may indeed lie between the rows of GMO cornstalks.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the incidence of burglary has yielded some tantalizing results. Our analysis for the period from 2005 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9522552, along with an r-squared value of 0.9067899. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The visually striking alignment of data is represented in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO corn usage and burglary rates in Texas. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words, and in this case, it seems to tell a particularly captivating tale of corn and crime.
The remarkably high correlation coefficient is a testament to the unexpected bond between agricultural practices and criminal behaviors. It appears that the "stalk market" for GMO corn and the "burglar-alarmingly high" rates of burglary in Texas have found themselves entwined in a statistically significant relationship. This correlation suggests that as the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation has increased, so too has the incidence of burglary, creating a curious "ear-resistible" trend that warrants further investigation.
The significance of our findings cannot be overstated. It appears that the "maize maze" of genetically modified corn has not only revolutionized agricultural practices but has also sown the seeds for a potential surge in criminal activities. The very crops that were intended to fortify the agricultural landscape against pests may have unwittingly attracted a different kind of pest—the incorrigibly resourceful burglars.
Beyond the statistical figures, our research paints a vivid portrait of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. The "ear-itable" curiosity that propelled this inquiry has led to a captivating revelation about the intricate dance between innovation and its unintended consequences. From the agricultural fields to the darkest alleys, this study underscores the ripple effects of technological advancements and their impact on societal dynamics, rendering the once-innocuous corn kernels as a focal point of intrigue.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a compelling relationship between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of burglary in Texas. This unexpected correlation casts a spotlight on the intricate connections between agricultural practices and criminal behaviors, compelling further inquiry into this "corn-undrum" and its implications for agricultural and criminological domains alike. As we peel back the layers of this enigmatic nexus, we invite the scholarly community to join us in navigating this "maize maze" and unearth the "kernel" of truth lurking within.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study provides compelling evidence of a strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation in Texas and the incidence of burglary. While some may see our findings as simply adding to the "cornfusion" of contemporary agricultural and criminological discourse, it is clear that there is a "kernel" of truth to be unearthed here.

The statistically robust relationship revealed in our analysis not only points to a significant connection between GMO corn usage and burglary rates, but also serves as a reminder of the need to "stalk" the intersection of innovation and unintended consequences. As we ponder the unexpected twists and "cornundrums" of our results, it becomes clear that the world of agricultural science and criminal behavior may be more "earsplittingly" interconnected than previously thought.

It is evident that our findings raise intriguing questions about the broader implications of GMO adoption in corn cultivation, prompting us to consider the "cereal" repercussions of agricultural advancements on societal dynamics. As we bid adieu to this "cornival" of statistical analysis, it is our firm belief that the time has come to put this particular "maize maze" to rest, thereby affirming that no further research in this area is needed. After all, sometimes a quirky correlation can simply be a "stalk" of statistical happenstance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Maize to Maze: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Cornily Crafty Criminals in Texas with an abstract of This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas and the incidence of burglary. Our study utilizes data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services to address this unexpected yet compelling inquiry. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9522552 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the timespan from 2005 to 2022, our findings indicate a strong and noteworthy relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the perpetration of burglaries. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the statistical evidence, presenting a compelling case for further investigation into this cornundrum and its potential implications.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, genetically modified organisms, corn cultivation, Texas, burglary correlation, USDA data, FBI crime data, statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, burglary rate, GMO adoption, corn production, maize, criminal activity, agricultural crime, GMO impact on crime

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Texas that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Texas

Burglary rates in the US
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglary rates in the US

Correlation r = 0.9522552 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9067899 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Burglary rates in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Texas) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-9. 0.0000000011684164391754282000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 1.2E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 855,859,235 random variables You don't actually need 855 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Texas (GMO corn %)21272220211822201612108566835
Burglary rates in the US (Burglary rate)726.9733.1726.1733717.7701701.3672.2610.5537.2494.7468.9429.7378340.5314.2270.9269.8




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21,27,22,20,21,18,22,20,16,12,10,8,5,6,6,8,3,5,])
array_2 = np.array([726.9,733.1,726.1,733,717.7,701,701.3,672.2,610.5,537.2,494.7,468.9,429.7,378,340.5,314.2,270.9,269.8,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Texas"
array_2_name = "Burglary rates in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 1333 · Black Variable ID: 721 · Red Variable ID: 20084
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0