about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,329 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and the second variable is Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2017, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Serena Williams continued to dominate the tennis world, fans couldn't help but feel the need to clean up their act and their homes. Watching her powerful performance on the court must have sparked a desire for sparkling whites both on and off the tennis court. It's like they say, when Serena serves up success, people go looking for that ACE-ful clean with bleach!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] An ethereal and vibrant depiction of Serena Williams radiating strength and determination on a tennis court, her form exuding power and grace. In the background, a colorful and surreal representation of Google search bars soaring into the sky, shimmering with the words 'where to buy bleach', symbolizing the collective aspiration of the audience to emulate Serena's resilience through the transformative power of bleach. The scene captures a whimsical and fantastical essence, blending Serena's dominance with the audience's determination in a visually captivating manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Concept art Charcoal Whimsical illustration Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach', in the following situation: As Serena Williams dominates the Grand Slam Finals, people are inspired to clean up their act and hit the refresh button on their lives. They want to emulate her winning mentality by scrubbing away the competition and de-staining their reputation. It's like they're saying, "If Serena can power through tough matches, then I can power through tough stains!" Plus, with all the sweat and tears on the tennis court, spectators might be thinking, "If bleach can handle that, it can definitely handle my dirty laundry too!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the intense energy of the Grand Slam Finals, Serena Williams stands victorious on the tennis court, her determination and strength palpable. In the background, a surge of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' reflects the determination of onlookers to mirror Serena's drive by tackling tough stains and refreshing their surroundings. The scene embodies a powerful synergy between Serena's dominance on the court and the audience's aspiration to emulate her resilience in their own lives through the transformative power of bleach.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the intense energy of the Grand Slam Finals, Serena Williams stands victorious on the tennis court, her determination and strength palpable. In the background, a surge of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' reflects the determination of onlookers to mirror Serena's drive by tackling tough stains and refreshing their surroundings. The scene embodies a powerful synergy between Serena's dominance on the court and the audience's aspiration to emulate her resilience in their own lives through the transformative power of bleach. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Whimsical illustration ] An ethereal and vibrant depiction of Serena Williams radiating strength and determination on a tennis court, her form exuding power and grace. In the background, a colorful and surreal representation of Google search bars soaring into the sky, shimmering with the words 'where to buy bleach', symbolizing the collective aspiration of the audience to emulate Serena's resilience through the transformative power of bleach. The scene captures a whimsical and fantastical essence, blending Serena's dominance with the audience's determination in a visually captivating manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams positively influenced where to buy bleach (Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches

The Journal of Quirky Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05 for 2004 to 2017.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends for the period 2004 to 2017, our research team computed a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05, revealing a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a curious pattern that invites further investigation and elicits the need for tongue-in-cheek interpretations. We delve into the implications of this unanticipated linkage, offering intriguing insights and perhaps a light-hearted perspective on the intersection of sports fandom and domestic hygiene.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends for the period 2004 to 2017, our research team computed a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05, revealing a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a curious pattern that invites further investigation and elicits the need for tongue-in-cheek interpretations. We delve into the implications of this unanticipated linkage, offering intriguing insights and perhaps a light-hearted perspective on the intersection of sports fandom and domestic hygiene.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In recent years, the world of sports has increasingly permeated various aspects of society, from commerce to health and even, as this study reveals, household cleanliness. The emergence of powerful athletes as cultural icons has led to the intertwining of their achievements with the curiosity and behaviors of the general public. Serena Williams, a renowned tennis player with an impressive track record in Grand Slam finals, is a pertinent figure for examining these intersections. On the other hand, the search for household cleaning products, specifically bleach, serves as an unanticipated yet amusing parameter in measuring public interest and engagement.

The aim of this research is not only to prod at the correlations between seemingly unrelated concepts but to also infuse a sense of whimsy into the otherwise serious world of statistical analysis. It invites the reader to explore the potential interconnectedness of intellectual pursuits and mundane queries – a teasing challenge to the conventions of academic research. By exploring this unconventional avenue, we hope to spark a lighthearted dialogue within the often austere realm of scholarly investigation.

In this paper, we unravel the seemingly incongruous relationship between the triumphs of an athletic powerhouse and the rather mundane online searches for a notorious household disinfectant. We divulge the statistical conundrums and the underlying farcical nature of this quirky correlation. While we refrain from asserting causation or drawing definitive conclusions, we invite readers to embrace the whimsy in dissecting this serendipitous parallel. Let us embark on this whimsical exploration and entertain the prospect of a "slam dunk" in the curious corridors of research canon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends for the period 2004 to 2017, our research team computed a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05, revealing a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a curious pattern that invites further investigation and elicits the need for tongue-in-cheek interpretations. We delve into the implications of this unanticipated linkage, offering intriguing insights and perhaps a light-hearted perspective on the intersection of sports fandom and domestic hygiene.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the world of sports has increasingly permeated various aspects of society, from commerce to health and even, as this study reveals, household cleanliness. The emergence of powerful athletes as cultural icons has led to the intertwining of their achievements with the curiosity and behaviors of the general public. Serena Williams, a renowned tennis player with an impressive track record in Grand Slam finals, is a pertinent figure for examining these intersections. On the other hand, the search for household cleaning products, specifically bleach, serves as an unanticipated yet amusing parameter in measuring public interest and engagement.
The aim of this research is not only to prod at the correlations between seemingly unrelated concepts but to also infuse a sense of whimsy into the otherwise serious world of statistical analysis. It invites the reader to explore the potential interconnectedness of intellectual pursuits and mundane queries – a teasing challenge to the conventions of academic research. By exploring this unconventional avenue, we hope to spark a lighthearted dialogue within the often austere realm of scholarly investigation.
In this paper, we unravel the seemingly incongruous relationship between the triumphs of an athletic powerhouse and the rather mundane online searches for a notorious household disinfectant. We divulge the statistical conundrums and the underlying farcical nature of this quirky correlation. While we refrain from asserting causation or drawing definitive conclusions, we invite readers to embrace the whimsy in dissecting this serendipitous parallel. Let us embark on this whimsical exploration and entertain the prospect of a "slam dunk" in the curious corridors of research canon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the correlation between Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and the frequency of online searches for "where to buy bleach" has retained the interest of researchers in various fields. Smith et al. (2015) examined the impact of athletic achievements on public behavior, highlighting the potential influence of sports figures on consumer choices. Doe (2018) delved into the realm of online search trends and its implications for societal patterns, opening avenues for unorthodox investigations such as the one presented in this paper. Jones (2017) explored the nuances of popular culture and its resonance with everyday activities, laying the groundwork for our examination of the idiosyncratic connection between sports events and domestic sanitation queries.

In "Tennis Phenomenon: The Rise of Serena Williams," Lorem and Ipsum (2019) offer a comprehensive account of Serena Williams' dominance in the sport, presenting a thorough analysis of her impact on popular culture outside the confines of tennis. Furthermore, "Bleach and Beyond: A Comprehensive Study of Household Disinfectants" by Lorem Ipsum (2016) provides an in-depth exploration of the prevalence and usage of bleach, shedding light on its significance in domestic environments.

Turning to fictional literature, Vincent's "The Grand Slam Mystery" (2012) presents a thrilling narrative set in the backdrop of prestigious tennis tournaments, albeit lacking in any references to household cleaning products. "Bleach: The Forbidden Savior" by Miller (2008) offers a fantastical tale of a mystical substance with the power to cleanse any blemish, both mundane and supernatural.

In the realm of internet culture, the viral meme "Serena Williams' Victory Speech Remix" and the enduring popularity of "Bleach Boy Problems" illustrate the whimsical expressions of fandom and the comical extent to which the public engages with online content relating to our subjects of interest.

As we immerse ourselves in the scholarly and leisurely spectrums of literature and online content, the stage is set for a light-hearted yet poignant exploration of the enigmatic relationship between the prowess of a tennis legend and the quest for household hygiene.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2017

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends for the period 2004 to 2017, our research team computed a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05, revealing a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a curious pattern that invites further investigation and elicits the need for tongue-in-cheek interpretations. We delve into the implications of this unanticipated linkage, offering intriguing insights and perhaps a light-hearted perspective on the intersection of sports fandom and domestic hygiene.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the world of sports has increasingly permeated various aspects of society, from commerce to health and even, as this study reveals, household cleanliness. The emergence of powerful athletes as cultural icons has led to the intertwining of their achievements with the curiosity and behaviors of the general public. Serena Williams, a renowned tennis player with an impressive track record in Grand Slam finals, is a pertinent figure for examining these intersections. On the other hand, the search for household cleaning products, specifically bleach, serves as an unanticipated yet amusing parameter in measuring public interest and engagement.
The aim of this research is not only to prod at the correlations between seemingly unrelated concepts but to also infuse a sense of whimsy into the otherwise serious world of statistical analysis. It invites the reader to explore the potential interconnectedness of intellectual pursuits and mundane queries – a teasing challenge to the conventions of academic research. By exploring this unconventional avenue, we hope to spark a lighthearted dialogue within the often austere realm of scholarly investigation.
In this paper, we unravel the seemingly incongruous relationship between the triumphs of an athletic powerhouse and the rather mundane online searches for a notorious household disinfectant. We divulge the statistical conundrums and the underlying farcical nature of this quirky correlation. While we refrain from asserting causation or drawing definitive conclusions, we invite readers to embrace the whimsy in dissecting this serendipitous parallel. Let us embark on this whimsical exploration and entertain the prospect of a "slam dunk" in the curious corridors of research canon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
To capture the essence of this whimsical correlation, we engaged in a meandering journey through the digital landscape. Our data collection involved the tireless perusal of Wikipedia entries detailing Serena Williams' illustrious career and countless Google Trends searches for mentions of "where to buy bleach." As we embarked on this adventure, we encountered a multitude of distractions, from amusing cat videos to tempting online shopping offers for cleaning supplies – a true test of our research team's resolve and susceptibility to the wiles of the internet.

Data Analysis:
Armed with an unparalleled dedication to uncovering the unexpected, we harnessed the power of statistical analysis to scrutinize the data. Meticulously plotting the historic occurrences of Serena Williams' Grand Slam finals alongside the ebbs and flows of the public's interest in bleach acquisition, we ventured into the heart of correlation coefficients and p-values. Our journey through the statistical wilderness was not without its perils, as we navigated the treacherous terrain of outliers and confounding variables, all the while steadfast in our pursuit of this enthralling, if not slightly quirky, scholarly endeavor.

Variable Considerations:
We paid careful attention to the multitude of variables that might influence the observed relationship between Grand Slam finals and bleach inquiries. Factors such as media coverage, public sentiment, and clandestine societal trends all danced around the periphery of our investigation, teasing us with their potential to confound our findings. However, with a nod to the whimsical spirit of this study, we embraced the chaos and sought to extract patterns from the ostensibly nonsensical intersection of sports and household cleaning.

Timeframe:
Our research traversed the temporal landscape spanning from 2004 to 2017, capturing the ebullient rise of Serena Williams' dominance on the tennis court and the undulating tides of public interest in bleach procurement. This timeframe offered a canvas upon which we could paint our statistical masterpiece, blending the strokes of athletic prowess with the splashes of domestic fixation in a vivid tapestry of correlation and amusement.

In conclusion, our methodology, though unconventional, was a veritable blend of earnest inquiry and whimsical fervor. As we delved into the unexpected relationship between Grand Slam finals and household cleaning product searches, we joyfully embraced the lighthearted spirit of this curious pursuit, boldly venturing into the uncharted realms of statistically significant mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2017, you found a correlation 0.5905282, r-squared of 0.3487235, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends for the period 2004 to 2017, our research team computed a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05, revealing a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a curious pattern that invites further investigation and elicits the need for tongue-in-cheek interpretations. We delve into the implications of this unanticipated linkage, offering intriguing insights and perhaps a light-hearted perspective on the intersection of sports fandom and domestic hygiene.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In recent years, the world of sports has increasingly permeated various aspects of society, from commerce to health and even, as this study reveals, household cleanliness. The emergence of powerful athletes as cultural icons has led to the intertwining of their achievements with the curiosity and behaviors of the general public. Serena Williams, a renowned tennis player with an impressive track record in Grand Slam finals, is a pertinent figure for examining these intersections. On the other hand, the search for household cleaning products, specifically bleach, serves as an unanticipated yet amusing parameter in measuring public interest and engagement.
The aim of this research is not only to prod at the correlations between seemingly unrelated concepts but to also infuse a sense of whimsy into the otherwise serious world of statistical analysis. It invites the reader to explore the potential interconnectedness of intellectual pursuits and mundane queries – a teasing challenge to the conventions of academic research. By exploring this unconventional avenue, we hope to spark a lighthearted dialogue within the often austere realm of scholarly investigation.
In this paper, we unravel the seemingly incongruous relationship between the triumphs of an athletic powerhouse and the rather mundane online searches for a notorious household disinfectant. We divulge the statistical conundrums and the underlying farcical nature of this quirky correlation. While we refrain from asserting causation or drawing definitive conclusions, we invite readers to embrace the whimsy in dissecting this serendipitous parallel. Let us embark on this whimsical exploration and entertain the prospect of a "slam dunk" in the curious corridors of research canon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach" yielded surprising and, dare we say, bleaching... I mean, breathtaking results. The correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and an r-squared of 0.3487235 indicated a moderately strong positive correlation, while the p-value of < 0.05 affirmed the statistical significance of this connection. It seems that when Serena was acing her way through Grand Slam finals, the searches for bleach were also trending at a fever pitch.

Particularly noteworthy is the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the variables. The data points form a trajectory that can only be described as an "ace" in the world of statistical graphics, demonstrating a persistently positive pattern that beckons attention, if not a whimsical smirk.

The results, although unexpected, are not without the potential for light-hearted speculation and thought-provoking contemplation. We tread cautiously yet playfully on the hallowed grounds of research, where statistical eccentricities and amusing curiosities parade hand in hand, beckoning us to ponder the hidden threads of influence that interweave Serena's tennis prowess with the alluring scent of household detergents.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends for the period 2004 to 2017, our research team computed a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05, revealing a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a curious pattern that invites further investigation and elicits the need for tongue-in-cheek interpretations. We delve into the implications of this unanticipated linkage, offering intriguing insights and perhaps a light-hearted perspective on the intersection of sports fandom and domestic hygiene.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the correlation between Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and the frequency of online searches for "where to buy bleach" has retained the interest of researchers in various fields. Smith et al. (2015) examined the impact of athletic achievements on public behavior, highlighting the potential influence of sports figures on consumer choices. Doe (2018) delved into the realm of online search trends and its implications for societal patterns, opening avenues for unorthodox investigations such as the one presented in this paper. Jones (2017) explored the nuances of popular culture and its resonance with everyday activities, laying the groundwork for our examination of the idiosyncratic connection between sports events and domestic sanitation queries.
In "Tennis Phenomenon: The Rise of Serena Williams," Lorem and Ipsum (2019) offer a comprehensive account of Serena Williams' dominance in the sport, presenting a thorough analysis of her impact on popular culture outside the confines of tennis. Furthermore, "Bleach and Beyond: A Comprehensive Study of Household Disinfectants" by Lorem Ipsum (2016) provides an in-depth exploration of the prevalence and usage of bleach, shedding light on its significance in domestic environments.
Turning to fictional literature, Vincent's "The Grand Slam Mystery" (2012) presents a thrilling narrative set in the backdrop of prestigious tennis tournaments, albeit lacking in any references to household cleaning products. "Bleach: The Forbidden Savior" by Miller (2008) offers a fantastical tale of a mystical substance with the power to cleanse any blemish, both mundane and supernatural.
In the realm of internet culture, the viral meme "Serena Williams' Victory Speech Remix" and the enduring popularity of "Bleach Boy Problems" illustrate the whimsical expressions of fandom and the comical extent to which the public engages with online content relating to our subjects of interest.
As we immerse ourselves in the scholarly and leisurely spectrums of literature and online content, the stage is set for a light-hearted yet poignant exploration of the enigmatic relationship between the prowess of a tennis legend and the quest for household hygiene.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach" yielded surprising and, dare we say, bleaching... I mean, breathtaking results. The correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and an r-squared of 0.3487235 indicated a moderately strong positive correlation, while the p-value of < 0.05 affirmed the statistical significance of this connection. It seems that when Serena was acing her way through Grand Slam finals, the searches for bleach were also trending at a fever pitch.
Particularly noteworthy is the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the variables. The data points form a trajectory that can only be described as an "ace" in the world of statistical graphics, demonstrating a persistently positive pattern that beckons attention, if not a whimsical smirk.
The results, although unexpected, are not without the potential for light-hearted speculation and thought-provoking contemplation. We tread cautiously yet playfully on the hallowed grounds of research, where statistical eccentricities and amusing curiosities parade hand in hand, beckoning us to ponder the hidden threads of influence that interweave Serena's tennis prowess with the alluring scent of household detergents.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study reveal a compelling association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." While it might seem as nonsensical as a tennis fan showing up to watch a match with a bottle of bleach in hand, our results align with prior research that has explored the impact of prominent sports figures on public behavior. The correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and the intriguing scatterplot pattern concur with the scholarly works of Smith et al. (2015), Doe (2018), and Jones (2017), all of whom have sowed the seeds for unconventional inquiries into the interplay between athletic achievements and everyday choices. One might say that our findings serve up a striking backhand volley in the realm of unorthodox research themes, intriguing for its unexpectedness and potential comedic value.

Drawing from the meticulous groundwork of Lorem and Ipsum (2019) in dissecting Serena Williams' cultural impact, our findings add an unanticipated layer to the tapestry of her influence, subtly infusing humor into the serious discourse of sports and society. Similarly, the comprehensive study by Lorem Ipsum (2016) on household disinfectants gains a quirky complement through our correlation study, suggesting that the allure of bleach can extend beyond mundane sanitary purposes to embrace a captivating dance with the world of sports fandom.

Our results underscore the resonance between popular culture and seemingly mundane activities, echoing the insights of Vincent's "The Grand Slam Mystery" and Miller's "Bleach: The Forbidden Savior," whose mentions of sports and bleach, while fictional, appear to have an indeterminate hold on reality. This interplay between reality and fiction, between statistics and whimsy, amplifies the flavor of our findings, akin to a lively tennis match punctuated by unexpected volleys and serves.

In the scholarly alleys of literature and the playful courts of internet culture, our study unfurls the potential for light-hearted yet substantive exploration, reminding us that scientific inquiry can tread the charmingly enigmatic path between Serena's on-court triumphs and the seemingly mundane allure of household sanitation products. The idiosyncratic relationship we have uncovered nudges the boundaries of research into a realm that, much like a riveting tennis rally, transcends the conventional and beckons us to delight in the delightful unpredictability of statistical association. Like a well-placed drop shot, our findings invite not just contemplation, but also a sly grin at the whimsies of research.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams and Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the potential association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends for the period 2004 to 2017, our research team computed a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05, revealing a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a curious pattern that invites further investigation and elicits the need for tongue-in-cheek interpretations. We delve into the implications of this unanticipated linkage, offering intriguing insights and perhaps a light-hearted perspective on the intersection of sports fandom and domestic hygiene.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In recent years, the world of sports has increasingly permeated various aspects of society, from commerce to health and even, as this study reveals, household cleanliness. The emergence of powerful athletes as cultural icons has led to the intertwining of their achievements with the curiosity and behaviors of the general public. Serena Williams, a renowned tennis player with an impressive track record in Grand Slam finals, is a pertinent figure for examining these intersections. On the other hand, the search for household cleaning products, specifically bleach, serves as an unanticipated yet amusing parameter in measuring public interest and engagement.
The aim of this research is not only to prod at the correlations between seemingly unrelated concepts but to also infuse a sense of whimsy into the otherwise serious world of statistical analysis. It invites the reader to explore the potential interconnectedness of intellectual pursuits and mundane queries – a teasing challenge to the conventions of academic research. By exploring this unconventional avenue, we hope to spark a lighthearted dialogue within the often austere realm of scholarly investigation.
In this paper, we unravel the seemingly incongruous relationship between the triumphs of an athletic powerhouse and the rather mundane online searches for a notorious household disinfectant. We divulge the statistical conundrums and the underlying farcical nature of this quirky correlation. While we refrain from asserting causation or drawing definitive conclusions, we invite readers to embrace the whimsy in dissecting this serendipitous parallel. Let us embark on this whimsical exploration and entertain the prospect of a "slam dunk" in the curious corridors of research canon.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach" yielded surprising and, dare we say, bleaching... I mean, breathtaking results. The correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and an r-squared of 0.3487235 indicated a moderately strong positive correlation, while the p-value of < 0.05 affirmed the statistical significance of this connection. It seems that when Serena was acing her way through Grand Slam finals, the searches for bleach were also trending at a fever pitch.
Particularly noteworthy is the scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the variables. The data points form a trajectory that can only be described as an "ace" in the world of statistical graphics, demonstrating a persistently positive pattern that beckons attention, if not a whimsical smirk.
The results, although unexpected, are not without the potential for light-hearted speculation and thought-provoking contemplation. We tread cautiously yet playfully on the hallowed grounds of research, where statistical eccentricities and amusing curiosities parade hand in hand, beckoning us to ponder the hidden threads of influence that interweave Serena's tennis prowess with the alluring scent of household detergents.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the connection between Serena Williams' success in Grand Slam finals and the spike in internet searches for bleach is undeniably intriguing, if not mildly amusing. While we cannot leap to conclusions or claim causation, the statistical evidence presents itself with a compelling, if not sparkling, correlation. It seems that as Serena served her way to victory, people were also seeking to serve cleanliness in their homes, perhaps inspired by the whiteness of both her tennis attire and the promise of clean, bleach-scented freshness.

These findings, while shedding light on an unexpected connection, also invite a playful examination of the curious paths that data can take us through. In the spirit of scientific discovery, we urge future researchers to not only replicate our analysis but also explore other unlikely correlations with a sprinkle of humor and a dash of whimsy. After all, in the age of big data, one can never underestimate the potential for delightful surprises, like stumbling upon an effortless backhand or an unexpectedly high coefficient of determination.

In this spirit, we assert that this study serves as an invigorating volley into the realm of statistical quirks and whimsical connections. With a wink and a nod to the statistical gods, we conclude that further research in this area might just be overkill.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Sports Psychology and Home Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Serena Slam Dunk: The Link Between Grand Slam Finals and Household Cleaning Product Searches with an abstract of This paper investigates the potential association between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams and internet searches for "where to buy bleach." Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends for the period 2004 to 2017, our research team computed a correlation coefficient of 0.5905282 and p < 0.05, revealing a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a curious pattern that invites further investigation and elicits the need for tongue-in-cheek interpretations. We delve into the implications of this unanticipated linkage, offering intriguing insights and perhaps a light-hearted perspective on the intersection of sports fandom and domestic hygiene.

ChatGPT:

Serena Williams, Grand Slam finals, household cleaning products, bleach, internet searches, Wikipedia, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, sports fandom, domestic hygiene

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams

Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'

Correlation r = 0.5905282 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3487235 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 34.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'where to buy bleach') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams) over the 14 years from 2004 through 2017.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.026. 0.0261860344377927430000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.59 in 2.6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 38 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.09, 0.85 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams (Finals)11012221221311
Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' (Rel. search volume)17.333310.08339.33333918.416725.416735.333332.583336.666732.333330.2531.416725.333324.8333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,1,0,1,2,2,2,1,2,2,1,3,1,1,])
array_2 = np.array([17.3333,10.0833,9.33333,9,18.4167,25.4167,35.3333,32.5833,36.6667,32.3333,30.25,31.4167,25.3333,24.8333,])
array_1_name = "Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'where to buy bleach'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1329 · Black Variable ID: 126 · Red Variable ID: 1366
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0