about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,326 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and the second variable is Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference has led to a decrease in overly competitive squirrels who are now pursuing friendlier, non-confrontational activities such as knitting acorn sweaters and hosting tea parties in the park. This has ultimately reduced the likelihood of encountering a hostile, playoff-mentality squirrel that's ready to defend its territory at all costs. Remember, a peaceful squirrel is a squirrel that won't go for the championship title of your picnic basket!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a backyard scene. In the foreground, a group of people are celebrating a hard-fought lacrosse game, with one team winning by a single goal. The characters are depicted in dynamic poses, conveying the intense excitement of the moment. In the background, another person is frantically searching on their phone for "attacked by a squirrel," adding a contrasting element of humor to the scene. The illustration conveys the energy and emotion of the victory alongside the unexpected humor of the squirrel search, all presented in the distinctive style of a 1960s comic book. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because as the National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference decreases, players become increasingly nimble and agile, making them less likely to be caught off guard by squirrels seeking to avenge their nut stashes being used as lacrosse balls. This results in a decrease in attacks by squirrels as players are able to evade their furry adversaries with ease.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Surrealism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a backyard, a group of people are celebrating a hard-fought lacrosse game, with one team winning by a single goal, while in the background, another person is frantically searching on their phone for "attacked by a squirrel."

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a backyard, a group of people are celebrating a hard-fought lacrosse game, with one team winning by a single goal, while in the background, another person is frantically searching on their phone for "attacked by a squirrel." Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a backyard scene. In the foreground, a group of people are celebrating a hard-fought lacrosse game, with one team winning by a single goal. The characters are depicted in dynamic poses, conveying the intense excitement of the moment. In the background, another person is frantically searching on their phone for "attacked by a squirrel," adding a contrasting element of humor to the scene. The illustration conveys the energy and emotion of the victory alongside the unexpected humor of the squirrel search, all presented in the distinctive style of a 1960s comic book.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference caused attacked by a squirrel (Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel') to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'

The Journal of Eclectic Sports and Bizarre Behavior

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the performance differentials in the National Lacrosse League Finals and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 with a significance level of p < 0.01. While the findings indicate a surprising statistical connection, we caution readers against jumping to squirrelly conclusions and remind them not to take the nutty aspects of this research too seriously. Nevertheless, this study sheds light on the amusing and unexpected connections that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as serious as a squirrel with an acorn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the performance differentials in the National Lacrosse League Finals and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 with a significance level of p < 0.01. While the findings indicate a surprising statistical connection, we caution readers against jumping to squirrelly conclusions and remind them not to take the nutty aspects of this research too seriously. Nevertheless, this study sheds light on the amusing and unexpected connections that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as serious as a squirrel with an acorn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

The world of sports has long been a bastion of statistical analysis, where pundits and enthusiasts alike eagerly dissect every aspect of athletic performance in pursuit of an elusive competitive edge. In recent years, the realm of sports analytics has expanded to encompass a wide array of unexpected variables, from weather patterns to fan sentiment on social media. Perhaps no other sport embraces the embracing of such data-driven inquiry than the National Lacrosse League (NLL), where every goal, assist, and save is carefully scrutinized for its potential impact on the outcome of the game.

However, amidst this statistical frenzy, one might not expect to stumble upon the seemingly incongruous correlation between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel." On the surface, one could dismiss such a correlation as nothing more than a statistical anomaly, a chance occurrence for which no rational explanation could possibly exist. However, this study endeavors to peel back the layers of this curious connection, teasing out any potential insights and implications that may lie beneath the surface.

As the NLL playoffs unfold, and the intensity of the matches reaches its peak, could it be that unsuspecting spectators are turning to the internet for stories of squirrel-related mischief? Or are we witnessing a bizarre synchronicity, a peculiar dance between lacrosse scores and furry woodland creatures that defies all logical explanation? Before we wade into the murky waters of speculation, it is incumbent upon us to conduct a rigorous examination of the data at hand, for in the realm of statistics, one should always approach the unexpected with a healthy dose of skepticism and a readiness to embrace the whimsical nature of the universe.

This paper aims to present the findings of our investigation, shedding light on the surprising relationship between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. As we journey through this curious landscape of statistics and squirrel-related internet queries, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that can emerge from the most unexpected of places. And so, dear reader, join us as we embark on this nutty adventure, where the net goals of lacrosse meet the nutty whims of the internet, reminding us that scientific inquiry is not always a solemn pursuit, but may harbor a bit of levity and whimsical charm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the performance differentials in the National Lacrosse League Finals and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 with a significance level of p < 0.01. While the findings indicate a surprising statistical connection, we caution readers against jumping to squirrelly conclusions and remind them not to take the nutty aspects of this research too seriously. Nevertheless, this study sheds light on the amusing and unexpected connections that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as serious as a squirrel with an acorn.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of sports has long been a bastion of statistical analysis, where pundits and enthusiasts alike eagerly dissect every aspect of athletic performance in pursuit of an elusive competitive edge. In recent years, the realm of sports analytics has expanded to encompass a wide array of unexpected variables, from weather patterns to fan sentiment on social media. Perhaps no other sport embraces the embracing of such data-driven inquiry than the National Lacrosse League (NLL), where every goal, assist, and save is carefully scrutinized for its potential impact on the outcome of the game.
However, amidst this statistical frenzy, one might not expect to stumble upon the seemingly incongruous correlation between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel." On the surface, one could dismiss such a correlation as nothing more than a statistical anomaly, a chance occurrence for which no rational explanation could possibly exist. However, this study endeavors to peel back the layers of this curious connection, teasing out any potential insights and implications that may lie beneath the surface.
As the NLL playoffs unfold, and the intensity of the matches reaches its peak, could it be that unsuspecting spectators are turning to the internet for stories of squirrel-related mischief? Or are we witnessing a bizarre synchronicity, a peculiar dance between lacrosse scores and furry woodland creatures that defies all logical explanation? Before we wade into the murky waters of speculation, it is incumbent upon us to conduct a rigorous examination of the data at hand, for in the realm of statistics, one should always approach the unexpected with a healthy dose of skepticism and a readiness to embrace the whimsical nature of the universe.
This paper aims to present the findings of our investigation, shedding light on the surprising relationship between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. As we journey through this curious landscape of statistics and squirrel-related internet queries, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that can emerge from the most unexpected of places. And so, dear reader, join us as we embark on this nutty adventure, where the net goals of lacrosse meet the nutty whims of the internet, reminding us that scientific inquiry is not always a solemn pursuit, but may harbor a bit of levity and whimsical charm.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In examining the curious relationship between the National Lacrosse League (NLL) Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel," our research team delved into a diverse array of scholarly works and literary sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of the peculiar connection. Examining the statistical complexities of athletic performance and the enigmatic allure of squirrel-related internet queries, the authors aim to provide a balanced interpretation of this whimsical yet intriguing association.

Previous research by Smith et al. (2017) has underscored the significance of goal differentials in competitive sports, emphasizing their impact on team morale and performance. Furthermore, Doe's seminal study (2015) revealed a correlation between Twitter mentions of wildlife encounters and fluctuations in soccer match outcomes. These studies lay a solid foundation for understanding the interconnectedness of sports statistics and public interest in unusual animal encounters.

Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction literature, "The Secret Life of Squirrels" by Jones (2018) offers a captivating exploration of squirrel behavior and their interactions with the natural environment. Additionally, the work of renowned biologist, Dr. Jane Goodall, provides valuable insights into the intricate social dynamics of wildlife, hinting at the potential allure of squirrel-related internet searches.

Delving into the world of fiction, "The Tale of Squirrel Nutkin" by Beatrix Potter and "Watership Down" by Richard Adams present compelling narratives of animal adventures, illustrating the timeless fascination with anthropomorphic animal characters and their whimsical escapades. These literary works provide a cultural backdrop for understanding the enduring appeal of animal-related content in the public sphere.

Moreover, within the realm of internet culture, the proliferation of squirrel-themed memes, such as the "Dramatic Chipmunk" and the "Evil Plotting Raccoon," reflects a broader societal fascination with comedic depictions of wildlife behavior. These memes serve as a testament to the enduring popularity of animal-related content in online communities, shedding light on the potential influences that may drive internet users to search for peculiar encounters with squirrels.

As the authors embark on this innovative investigation, it is essential to maintain a sense of humor and lightheartedness, acknowledging the whimsical nature of this research endeavor. While the correlation between NLL Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel" may initially seem far-fetched, it is crucial to approach this inquiry with an open mind and a willingness to uncover unexpected connections in the world of sports and internet phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the performance differentials in the National Lacrosse League Finals and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 with a significance level of p < 0.01. While the findings indicate a surprising statistical connection, we caution readers against jumping to squirrelly conclusions and remind them not to take the nutty aspects of this research too seriously. Nevertheless, this study sheds light on the amusing and unexpected connections that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as serious as a squirrel with an acorn.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of sports has long been a bastion of statistical analysis, where pundits and enthusiasts alike eagerly dissect every aspect of athletic performance in pursuit of an elusive competitive edge. In recent years, the realm of sports analytics has expanded to encompass a wide array of unexpected variables, from weather patterns to fan sentiment on social media. Perhaps no other sport embraces the embracing of such data-driven inquiry than the National Lacrosse League (NLL), where every goal, assist, and save is carefully scrutinized for its potential impact on the outcome of the game.
However, amidst this statistical frenzy, one might not expect to stumble upon the seemingly incongruous correlation between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel." On the surface, one could dismiss such a correlation as nothing more than a statistical anomaly, a chance occurrence for which no rational explanation could possibly exist. However, this study endeavors to peel back the layers of this curious connection, teasing out any potential insights and implications that may lie beneath the surface.
As the NLL playoffs unfold, and the intensity of the matches reaches its peak, could it be that unsuspecting spectators are turning to the internet for stories of squirrel-related mischief? Or are we witnessing a bizarre synchronicity, a peculiar dance between lacrosse scores and furry woodland creatures that defies all logical explanation? Before we wade into the murky waters of speculation, it is incumbent upon us to conduct a rigorous examination of the data at hand, for in the realm of statistics, one should always approach the unexpected with a healthy dose of skepticism and a readiness to embrace the whimsical nature of the universe.
This paper aims to present the findings of our investigation, shedding light on the surprising relationship between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. As we journey through this curious landscape of statistics and squirrel-related internet queries, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that can emerge from the most unexpected of places. And so, dear reader, join us as we embark on this nutty adventure, where the net goals of lacrosse meet the nutty whims of the internet, reminding us that scientific inquiry is not always a solemn pursuit, but may harbor a bit of levity and whimsical charm.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

This study employed a multidimensional approach to investigate the seemingly unorthodox relationship between the National Lacrosse League (NLL) Finalist Score Difference and the volume of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel." With data collected from a variety of sources including Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team adopted a lighthearted yet rigorously scientific method to navigate this uncharted territory of statistical humor.

Firstly, the National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference data was meticulously curated from official league records and publicly available statistical databases. This entailed poring over the net goals, assists, and turnovers of each game in the NLL Finals from 2004 to 2022, taking special care to discern the home and away team differentials. Following this, the volume of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel" was retrieved from Google Trends, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the frequency and temporal distribution of these eccentric inquiries.

An essential element of our methodological approach involved statistical software capable of handling the multidimensional nature of our data. Through the use of advanced statistical packages, we conducted correlation analyses to unveil the potential relationship between NLL Finalist Score Difference and the surge in squirrel-related internet curiosities. Additionally, various time-series and multivariate regression techniques were employed to probe the subtle nuances of this unlikely association, thus revealing the depth of the squirrel-sport relationship.

Notably, the research team also delved into the fascinating realm of anecdotal evidence from online forums and social media platforms, scouring the internet for accounts of squirrel skirmishes that might align with the temporal patterns identified in the Google search data. Although this facet of our investigation veered into slightly whimsical territory, it nevertheless provided valuable context to the broader narrative of this peculiar connection between athletic competition and arboreal critter encounters.

Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we conscientiously scrutinized the potential confounding variables that might influence both lacrosse performance differentials and internet search behaviors. From inclement weather conditions to the release of popular squirrel-themed films, our analysis took into account a wide range of extraneous factors that could inadvertently influence the observed correlation, albeit with a healthy dose of skepticism and a cheeky grin.

In summary, the methodology embraced an irreverently whimsical yet scientifically sound approach, amalgamating meticulous data collection and state-of-the-art statistical analyses with a dash of playful curiosity. As we twirled through the data with the grace of a nimble squirrel scampering across an autumnal canopy, our investigation sought to shine a light on the unexpected and the quirky, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge need not eschew the lighter side of life.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7708034, r-squared of 0.5941379, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the performance differentials in the National Lacrosse League Finals and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 with a significance level of p < 0.01. While the findings indicate a surprising statistical connection, we caution readers against jumping to squirrelly conclusions and remind them not to take the nutty aspects of this research too seriously. Nevertheless, this study sheds light on the amusing and unexpected connections that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as serious as a squirrel with an acorn.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of sports has long been a bastion of statistical analysis, where pundits and enthusiasts alike eagerly dissect every aspect of athletic performance in pursuit of an elusive competitive edge. In recent years, the realm of sports analytics has expanded to encompass a wide array of unexpected variables, from weather patterns to fan sentiment on social media. Perhaps no other sport embraces the embracing of such data-driven inquiry than the National Lacrosse League (NLL), where every goal, assist, and save is carefully scrutinized for its potential impact on the outcome of the game.
However, amidst this statistical frenzy, one might not expect to stumble upon the seemingly incongruous correlation between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel." On the surface, one could dismiss such a correlation as nothing more than a statistical anomaly, a chance occurrence for which no rational explanation could possibly exist. However, this study endeavors to peel back the layers of this curious connection, teasing out any potential insights and implications that may lie beneath the surface.
As the NLL playoffs unfold, and the intensity of the matches reaches its peak, could it be that unsuspecting spectators are turning to the internet for stories of squirrel-related mischief? Or are we witnessing a bizarre synchronicity, a peculiar dance between lacrosse scores and furry woodland creatures that defies all logical explanation? Before we wade into the murky waters of speculation, it is incumbent upon us to conduct a rigorous examination of the data at hand, for in the realm of statistics, one should always approach the unexpected with a healthy dose of skepticism and a readiness to embrace the whimsical nature of the universe.
This paper aims to present the findings of our investigation, shedding light on the surprising relationship between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. As we journey through this curious landscape of statistics and squirrel-related internet queries, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that can emerge from the most unexpected of places. And so, dear reader, join us as we embark on this nutty adventure, where the net goals of lacrosse meet the nutty whims of the internet, reminding us that scientific inquiry is not always a solemn pursuit, but may harbor a bit of levity and whimsical charm.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 between the National Lacrosse League (NLL) Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.5941379, indicating that approximately 59.41% of the variance in the frequency of searches for squirrel attacks can be explained by changes in the NLL Finalist Score Difference. The statistical significance of this relationship was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the observed association.

Our findings are visually represented in Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. The data points form a compelling upward trend, illustrating the synchronous movement between these seemingly disparate variables. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot certainly speaks volumes about the unexpected kinship between competitive lacrosse performances and the curiosity-inducing escapades of squirrels.

The implications of these results are both intriguing and, dare we say, nutty. While we have established a statistically significant relationship between NLL Finalist Score Difference and searches for squirrel attacks, we caution readers against ascribing causality solely based on these findings. As with any statistical analysis, correlation does not imply causation, and we tread cautiously in attributing lacrosse outcomes to the foraging habits of our bushy-tailed friends.

Nevertheless, this study offers a whimsical reminder that connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena can emerge in the most unexpected places. As we navigate the ever-expanding landscape of data analysis, let us not overlook the peculiarities and idiosyncrasies that add a dash of whimsy to our scholarly pursuits.

The robust correlation between NLL Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for squirrel-related mishaps beckons further exploration, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as predictable as the trajectory of a lacrosse ball. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this lighthearted pursuit, where the peculiarities of the natural world intertwine with the statistical underpinnings of athletic competition, yielding unexpected insights and perhaps a chuckle or two along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the performance differentials in the National Lacrosse League Finals and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 with a significance level of p < 0.01. While the findings indicate a surprising statistical connection, we caution readers against jumping to squirrelly conclusions and remind them not to take the nutty aspects of this research too seriously. Nevertheless, this study sheds light on the amusing and unexpected connections that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as serious as a squirrel with an acorn.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In examining the curious relationship between the National Lacrosse League (NLL) Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel," our research team delved into a diverse array of scholarly works and literary sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of the peculiar connection. Examining the statistical complexities of athletic performance and the enigmatic allure of squirrel-related internet queries, the authors aim to provide a balanced interpretation of this whimsical yet intriguing association.
Previous research by Smith et al. (2017) has underscored the significance of goal differentials in competitive sports, emphasizing their impact on team morale and performance. Furthermore, Doe's seminal study (2015) revealed a correlation between Twitter mentions of wildlife encounters and fluctuations in soccer match outcomes. These studies lay a solid foundation for understanding the interconnectedness of sports statistics and public interest in unusual animal encounters.
Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction literature, "The Secret Life of Squirrels" by Jones (2018) offers a captivating exploration of squirrel behavior and their interactions with the natural environment. Additionally, the work of renowned biologist, Dr. Jane Goodall, provides valuable insights into the intricate social dynamics of wildlife, hinting at the potential allure of squirrel-related internet searches.
Delving into the world of fiction, "The Tale of Squirrel Nutkin" by Beatrix Potter and "Watership Down" by Richard Adams present compelling narratives of animal adventures, illustrating the timeless fascination with anthropomorphic animal characters and their whimsical escapades. These literary works provide a cultural backdrop for understanding the enduring appeal of animal-related content in the public sphere.
Moreover, within the realm of internet culture, the proliferation of squirrel-themed memes, such as the "Dramatic Chipmunk" and the "Evil Plotting Raccoon," reflects a broader societal fascination with comedic depictions of wildlife behavior. These memes serve as a testament to the enduring popularity of animal-related content in online communities, shedding light on the potential influences that may drive internet users to search for peculiar encounters with squirrels.
As the authors embark on this innovative investigation, it is essential to maintain a sense of humor and lightheartedness, acknowledging the whimsical nature of this research endeavor. While the correlation between NLL Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel" may initially seem far-fetched, it is crucial to approach this inquiry with an open mind and a willingness to uncover unexpected connections in the world of sports and internet phenomena.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 between the National Lacrosse League (NLL) Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.5941379, indicating that approximately 59.41% of the variance in the frequency of searches for squirrel attacks can be explained by changes in the NLL Finalist Score Difference. The statistical significance of this relationship was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the observed association.
Our findings are visually represented in Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. The data points form a compelling upward trend, illustrating the synchronous movement between these seemingly disparate variables. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot certainly speaks volumes about the unexpected kinship between competitive lacrosse performances and the curiosity-inducing escapades of squirrels.
The implications of these results are both intriguing and, dare we say, nutty. While we have established a statistically significant relationship between NLL Finalist Score Difference and searches for squirrel attacks, we caution readers against ascribing causality solely based on these findings. As with any statistical analysis, correlation does not imply causation, and we tread cautiously in attributing lacrosse outcomes to the foraging habits of our bushy-tailed friends.
Nevertheless, this study offers a whimsical reminder that connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena can emerge in the most unexpected places. As we navigate the ever-expanding landscape of data analysis, let us not overlook the peculiarities and idiosyncrasies that add a dash of whimsy to our scholarly pursuits.
The robust correlation between NLL Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for squirrel-related mishaps beckons further exploration, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as predictable as the trajectory of a lacrosse ball. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this lighthearted pursuit, where the peculiarities of the natural world intertwine with the statistical underpinnings of athletic competition, yielding unexpected insights and perhaps a chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study point to a statistically significant correlation between the National Lacrosse League (NLL) Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. This finding supports earlier research by Smith et al. (2017) and Doe (2015) who established links between sports outcomes and public interest in wildlife encounters. While initially surprising, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 and an r-squared value of 0.5941379 illustrate a clear connection. This unexpected connection serves as a reminder that the intertwining of sports statistics and public interest can yield unexpected insights, much like the unpredictable movements of a squirrel on a park bench.

The literature review, delving into the cultural, literary, and internet phantasmagoria surrounding squirrels, laid a solid foundation for understanding the unexpected linkage discovered in this study. Indeed, the playful exploits of squirrel characters in Beatrix Potter's "The Tale of Squirrel Nutkin" and the humor-laden animal-themed internet memes underscore the enduring fascination with these bushy-tailed creatures. Just as a squirrel's antics often catch us off guard, so too did the surprising correlation between lacrosse performance metrics and squirrel-themed internet queries.

As we navigate the unexpected terrain of interconnections between sports outcomes and internet phenomena, it is crucial to embrace a lighthearted approach. The statistical significance of our findings points to a solid underpinning; however, we must not jump to causal conclusions as correlations do not imply direct causation. Paving the way for further research, this study tantalizingly beckons towards the whimsical intersection of athletic achievements and the curious escapades of our nut-gathering friends.

In unraveling the enigmatic dance between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and searches for squirrel encounters, we are reminded that scientific inquiry, like the unpredictable course of a squirrel's leap, can yield surprises that defy conventional wisdom. This research offers a playful respite from the conventional and invites our scholarly peers to join in the pursuit of unexpected connections that may tickle the intellect and perhaps even evoke a chuckle or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the performance differentials in the National Lacrosse League Finals and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 with a significance level of p < 0.01. While the findings indicate a surprising statistical connection, we caution readers against jumping to squirrelly conclusions and remind them not to take the nutty aspects of this research too seriously. Nevertheless, this study sheds light on the amusing and unexpected connections that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as serious as a squirrel with an acorn.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of sports has long been a bastion of statistical analysis, where pundits and enthusiasts alike eagerly dissect every aspect of athletic performance in pursuit of an elusive competitive edge. In recent years, the realm of sports analytics has expanded to encompass a wide array of unexpected variables, from weather patterns to fan sentiment on social media. Perhaps no other sport embraces the embracing of such data-driven inquiry than the National Lacrosse League (NLL), where every goal, assist, and save is carefully scrutinized for its potential impact on the outcome of the game.
However, amidst this statistical frenzy, one might not expect to stumble upon the seemingly incongruous correlation between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "attacked by a squirrel." On the surface, one could dismiss such a correlation as nothing more than a statistical anomaly, a chance occurrence for which no rational explanation could possibly exist. However, this study endeavors to peel back the layers of this curious connection, teasing out any potential insights and implications that may lie beneath the surface.
As the NLL playoffs unfold, and the intensity of the matches reaches its peak, could it be that unsuspecting spectators are turning to the internet for stories of squirrel-related mischief? Or are we witnessing a bizarre synchronicity, a peculiar dance between lacrosse scores and furry woodland creatures that defies all logical explanation? Before we wade into the murky waters of speculation, it is incumbent upon us to conduct a rigorous examination of the data at hand, for in the realm of statistics, one should always approach the unexpected with a healthy dose of skepticism and a readiness to embrace the whimsical nature of the universe.
This paper aims to present the findings of our investigation, shedding light on the surprising relationship between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. As we journey through this curious landscape of statistics and squirrel-related internet queries, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that can emerge from the most unexpected of places. And so, dear reader, join us as we embark on this nutty adventure, where the net goals of lacrosse meet the nutty whims of the internet, reminding us that scientific inquiry is not always a solemn pursuit, but may harbor a bit of levity and whimsical charm.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 between the National Lacrosse League (NLL) Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.5941379, indicating that approximately 59.41% of the variance in the frequency of searches for squirrel attacks can be explained by changes in the NLL Finalist Score Difference. The statistical significance of this relationship was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness of the observed association.
Our findings are visually represented in Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the strong positive correlation between the NLL Finalist Score Difference and the frequency of Google searches for alleged squirrel attacks. The data points form a compelling upward trend, illustrating the synchronous movement between these seemingly disparate variables. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot certainly speaks volumes about the unexpected kinship between competitive lacrosse performances and the curiosity-inducing escapades of squirrels.
The implications of these results are both intriguing and, dare we say, nutty. While we have established a statistically significant relationship between NLL Finalist Score Difference and searches for squirrel attacks, we caution readers against ascribing causality solely based on these findings. As with any statistical analysis, correlation does not imply causation, and we tread cautiously in attributing lacrosse outcomes to the foraging habits of our bushy-tailed friends.
Nevertheless, this study offers a whimsical reminder that connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena can emerge in the most unexpected places. As we navigate the ever-expanding landscape of data analysis, let us not overlook the peculiarities and idiosyncrasies that add a dash of whimsy to our scholarly pursuits.
The robust correlation between NLL Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for squirrel-related mishaps beckons further exploration, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as predictable as the trajectory of a lacrosse ball. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this lighthearted pursuit, where the peculiarities of the natural world intertwine with the statistical underpinnings of athletic competition, yielding unexpected insights and perhaps a chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between National Lacrosse League (NLL) Finalist Score Difference and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' has brought to light a correlation both statistically significant and decidedly whimsical. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value provide strong evidence of the unexpected kinship between athletic performance and the frequency of squirrel-related internet queries, prompting us to ponder the mysterious dance between lacrosse scores and the mischievous antics of our furry woodland friends.

However, it is important to approach these findings with a healthy dose of skepticism, as our analysis does not imply a causal relationship between the two variables. As we resist the temptation to leap to squirrelly conclusions, we are reminded of the playful unpredictability that often accompanies statistical inquiry, reminding us that the realm of data analysis need not always be as solemn as a squirrel with an acorn.

While we advocate for scholarly rigor and cautious interpretation of our findings, we cannot deny the lighthearted charm of stumbling upon such a curious statistical connection. It serves as a testament to the delightful idiosyncrasies that may emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, and invites us to embrace the whimsical nature of our scientific endeavors.

In light of these findings, it is our firm belief that no further research on this particular correlation is needed, for we have ventured into the eccentric realm where net goals and nutty squirrels intersect, and found ourselves richer for the experience. Let us turn our attention to other intriguing inquiries, leaving this particular nut to be cracked by future generations of curious minds.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Sports and Bizarre Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Lacrosse and Unusual Animal Behavior Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Net Goals or Nutty Squirrels: Investigating the Link Between National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference and Google Searches for 'Attacked by a Squirrel' with an abstract of This study delves into the curious relationship between the performance differentials in the National Lacrosse League Finals and the frequency of Google searches for the peculiar query "attacked by a squirrel." Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7708034 with a significance level of p < 0.01. While the findings indicate a surprising statistical connection, we caution readers against jumping to squirrelly conclusions and remind them not to take the nutty aspects of this research too seriously. Nevertheless, this study sheds light on the amusing and unexpected connections that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena, reminding us that scientific inquiry need not always be as serious as a squirrel with an acorn.

ChatGPT:

National Lacrosse League Finals, score difference, performance differentials, Google searches, attacked by a squirrel, correlation coefficient, significance level, statistical connection, squirrel behavior, unexpected connections, scientific inquiry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference

Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'

Correlation r = 0.7708034 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5941379 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 59.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00011. 0.0001122237641163350700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.77 in 0.011% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,911 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.49, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference (Score difference)3672124131122212001
Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' (Rel. search volume)12.251211.752.4166703.333334.752.54.333333.9166720.9166672.583330.750.4166671.166671.416673.583334.16667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3,6,7,2,1,2,4,1,3,1,1,2,2,2,1,2,0,0,1,])
array_2 = np.array([12.25,12,11.75,2.41667,0,3.33333,4.75,2.5,4.33333,3.91667,2,0.916667,2.58333,0.75,0.416667,1.16667,1.41667,3.58333,4.16667,])
array_1_name = "National Lacrosse League Finalist Score Difference"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 1326 · Black Variable ID: 377 · Red Variable ID: 1354
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0