about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,317 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Rachel and the second variable is Arson in Texas.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer Rachels meant fewer fiery spells, as the name 'Rachel' sounds a lot like 'hell'—coincidence? I think not! With less Rachel, there's a lull in the 'arson' epidemic, leading to a 'burning' question: is there a name-based conspiracy heating up in Texas? It's a 'name game' with some real 'firepower'!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Generate an image of a room with a wall where colorful cards are hanging from strings, with the names of people written on them. Among them, there are fewer cards with the name "Rachel" compared to the others. Incorporate a visual representation of a map of Texas on another wall, and a line graph showing a decrease in the number of arson incidents in the state. The decrease in "Rachel" leads to fewer people being named Rachel, which results in a decrease in the probability of someone named Rachel becoming an arsonist in Texas. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because the decrease in popularity of the name Rachel led to fewer people being named Rachel, which in turn decreased the chances of someone named Rachel becoming an arsonist in Texas.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Celtic art Concept art Glitch art A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because the decrease in popularity of the name Rachel led to fewer people being named Rachel, which in turn decreased the chances of someone named Rachel becoming an arsonist in Texas.
ChatGPT: Imagine a room with several people's names written on colorful cards hanging from strings. You notice that there are fewer cards with the name "Rachel" than before. As a result, you see fewer people being named Rachel. Then, you notice a map of Texas, and you see a line graph showing a decrease in the number of arson incidents. The image conveys that the decrease in the popularity of the name Rachel led to fewer people being named Rachel, which then decreased the chances of someone named Rachel becoming an arsonist in Texas.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a room with several people's names written on colorful cards hanging from strings. You notice that there are fewer cards with the name "Rachel" than before. As a result, you see fewer people being named Rachel. Then, you notice a map of Texas, and you see a line graph showing a decrease in the number of arson incidents. The image conveys that the decrease in the popularity of the name Rachel led to fewer people being named Rachel, which then decreased the chances of someone named Rachel becoming an arsonist in Texas. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Generate an image of a room with a wall where colorful cards are hanging from strings, with the names of people written on them. Among them, there are fewer cards with the name "Rachel" compared to the others. Incorporate a visual representation of a map of Texas on another wall, and a line graph showing a decrease in the number of arson incidents in the state. The decrease in "Rachel" leads to fewer people being named Rachel, which results in a decrease in the probability of someone named Rachel becoming an arsonist in Texas.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Rachel caused Arson in Texas to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis

The Journal of Fiery Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Texas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in the state of Texas. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team meticulously combed through records from 1985 to 2022. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold. Our findings suggest an intriguing connection that may kindle further inquiries into the enigmatic forces at play. This study not only sheds light on the curious intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a fiery flourish to the realm of statistical research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Texas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in the state of Texas. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team meticulously combed through records from 1985 to 2022. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold. Our findings suggest an intriguing connection that may kindle further inquiries into the enigmatic forces at play. This study not only sheds light on the curious intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a fiery flourish to the realm of statistical research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between names and their impact on individuals’ lives has long been a subject of interest and curiosity. The intertwining of nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has captivated the minds of researchers, sparking investigations into the potential influence of names on various aspects of human existence. In this vein, our research delves into the curious case of the first name Rachel and its possible association with the incidence of arson in the Lone Star State.

Texas, a state known for its resilience, barbecue, and expansive landscapes, also grapples with the complex issue of arson. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, carries significant consequences and has been a focal point of law enforcement efforts. As such, understanding the factors that may contribute to such criminal behavior is of utmost importance. With this in mind, our research seeks to explore an unconventional avenue – the correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the occurrence of arson in Texas.

The name Rachel, a timeless moniker exuding a sense of elegance and grace, has woven itself into the fabric of society, appearing across different time periods and cultural landscapes. Its enduring presence prompts one to ponder whether there is more to this name than meets the eye. Could it be possible, one may wonder, that the name Rachel exerts an unseen influence, stoking the flames of deviant behavior in the hearts of some? Our investigation sets out to shed light on this enigmatic possibility.

Leveraging extensive data sets from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team embarks on a journey through the annals of names and crime statistics. As we sift through years of records from 1985 to 2022, we aim to uncover any hints of a correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas. Employing rigorous statistical analyses, our pursuit is guided by an air of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we seek to untangle the potential threads that connect the captivating world of names with the solemn realm of criminal behavior.

As we embark on this captivating exploration, we do not merely seek to highlight an intriguing correlation. We also aim to add a spark of fascination to the landscape of statistical research, infusing the often solemn domain of data analysis with a burst of unconventional curiosity. Through our findings, we hope to provoke contemplation, inspire further inquiries, and perhaps even ignite a newfound appreciation for the intricate patterns that populate the tapestry of human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Texas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in the state of Texas. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team meticulously combed through records from 1985 to 2022. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold. Our findings suggest an intriguing connection that may kindle further inquiries into the enigmatic forces at play. This study not only sheds light on the curious intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a fiery flourish to the realm of statistical research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between names and their impact on individuals’ lives has long been a subject of interest and curiosity. The intertwining of nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has captivated the minds of researchers, sparking investigations into the potential influence of names on various aspects of human existence. In this vein, our research delves into the curious case of the first name Rachel and its possible association with the incidence of arson in the Lone Star State.
Texas, a state known for its resilience, barbecue, and expansive landscapes, also grapples with the complex issue of arson. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, carries significant consequences and has been a focal point of law enforcement efforts. As such, understanding the factors that may contribute to such criminal behavior is of utmost importance. With this in mind, our research seeks to explore an unconventional avenue – the correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the occurrence of arson in Texas.
The name Rachel, a timeless moniker exuding a sense of elegance and grace, has woven itself into the fabric of society, appearing across different time periods and cultural landscapes. Its enduring presence prompts one to ponder whether there is more to this name than meets the eye. Could it be possible, one may wonder, that the name Rachel exerts an unseen influence, stoking the flames of deviant behavior in the hearts of some? Our investigation sets out to shed light on this enigmatic possibility.
Leveraging extensive data sets from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team embarks on a journey through the annals of names and crime statistics. As we sift through years of records from 1985 to 2022, we aim to uncover any hints of a correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas. Employing rigorous statistical analyses, our pursuit is guided by an air of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we seek to untangle the potential threads that connect the captivating world of names with the solemn realm of criminal behavior.
As we embark on this captivating exploration, we do not merely seek to highlight an intriguing correlation. We also aim to add a spark of fascination to the landscape of statistical research, infusing the often solemn domain of data analysis with a burst of unconventional curiosity. Through our findings, we hope to provoke contemplation, inspire further inquiries, and perhaps even ignite a newfound appreciation for the intricate patterns that populate the tapestry of human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The search for connections between names and various outcomes has taken researchers down numerous intriguing paths, from the influence of names on career success to their potential impact on romantic relationships. The interplay of nomenclature and societal phenomena continues to pique the interest of scholars, leading to unconventional investigations that unearth unexpected correlations and spark lively debates. As we turn our attention to the curious case of the first name Rachel and its alleged association with arson in the state of Texas, we step into a realm where statistical rigor meets the whimsical musings of the human mind.

In "Name Associations and Societal Impacts," Smith explores the intricate ways in which names can intertwine with individuals' behaviors and choices, delving into the underlying mechanisms that may shape the trajectory of one's life. While the focus of the study may not explicitly center on arson, it lays the groundwork for contemplating the potential influence of a name such as Rachel on the actions of its bearers. Furthermore, Doe's examination in "The Psychological Significance of Names" unveils the psychological underpinnings of name perception, offering insights into the subconscious associations and biases that may underpin individuals' responses to different names, a factor that may unknowingly play a role in the purported connection between the popularity of the name Rachel and incidents of arson.

Jones' work, "Names and Criminal Behavior: A Statistical Analysis," brings the spotlight onto the correlation between names and criminal activities, with a particular focus on arson. Though the study does not specifically investigate the name Rachel, it indirectly lays the groundwork for considering the potential influences of nomenclature on criminal behavior, setting the stage for our own investigation.

As we venture further into the literary landscape, we encounter a myriad of non-fiction works that explore the psychology of naming and the complexities of human behavior. Books such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner and "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell offer nuanced perspectives on the unseen factors that shape human decision-making, inviting a consideration of how names may subtly influence individuals' actions and choices. Drawing from the rich tapestry of fiction, novels such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Night Circus" by Erin Morgenstern infuse the theme of names with an air of mystique and intrigue, hinting at the enigmatic forces that names may hold in the realm of human experience.

Furthermore, board games such as "Clue" and "Mysterium" provide a playful backdrop for contemplating the mysterious connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated elements, offering a lighthearted lens through which to approach our exploration of the potential link between the name Rachel and arson in Texas. While these sources may not directly align with our specific inquiry, they imbue the scholarly pursuit with a touch of whimsy, encouraging a multidimensional engagement with the research topic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Texas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in the state of Texas. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team meticulously combed through records from 1985 to 2022. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold. Our findings suggest an intriguing connection that may kindle further inquiries into the enigmatic forces at play. This study not only sheds light on the curious intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a fiery flourish to the realm of statistical research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between names and their impact on individuals’ lives has long been a subject of interest and curiosity. The intertwining of nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has captivated the minds of researchers, sparking investigations into the potential influence of names on various aspects of human existence. In this vein, our research delves into the curious case of the first name Rachel and its possible association with the incidence of arson in the Lone Star State.
Texas, a state known for its resilience, barbecue, and expansive landscapes, also grapples with the complex issue of arson. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, carries significant consequences and has been a focal point of law enforcement efforts. As such, understanding the factors that may contribute to such criminal behavior is of utmost importance. With this in mind, our research seeks to explore an unconventional avenue – the correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the occurrence of arson in Texas.
The name Rachel, a timeless moniker exuding a sense of elegance and grace, has woven itself into the fabric of society, appearing across different time periods and cultural landscapes. Its enduring presence prompts one to ponder whether there is more to this name than meets the eye. Could it be possible, one may wonder, that the name Rachel exerts an unseen influence, stoking the flames of deviant behavior in the hearts of some? Our investigation sets out to shed light on this enigmatic possibility.
Leveraging extensive data sets from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team embarks on a journey through the annals of names and crime statistics. As we sift through years of records from 1985 to 2022, we aim to uncover any hints of a correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas. Employing rigorous statistical analyses, our pursuit is guided by an air of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we seek to untangle the potential threads that connect the captivating world of names with the solemn realm of criminal behavior.
As we embark on this captivating exploration, we do not merely seek to highlight an intriguing correlation. We also aim to add a spark of fascination to the landscape of statistical research, infusing the often solemn domain of data analysis with a burst of unconventional curiosity. Through our findings, we hope to provoke contemplation, inspire further inquiries, and perhaps even ignite a newfound appreciation for the intricate patterns that populate the tapestry of human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this research endeavor harnessed a multidimensional approach, blending elements of statistical analysis with a pinch of whimsy and a sprinkle of intrigue. Our data collection process began with an extensive trawl through records from the US Social Security Administration, capturing the ebbs and flows of Rachel's popularity from 1985 to 2022. The compilation of this data often felt akin to navigating a labyrinth of nomenclatural intrigue, where each spike and dip in Rachel's prevalence evoked a unique narrative. We also delved into the vast repository of FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, where tales of arson danced on the fingertips of our data custodians, beckoning us to unearth any potential parallels with Rachel's dominion.

Drawing from these disparate yet harmonizing sources, we conjured a tapestry of statistical techniques to unfurl the mystery at hand. Amidst the sea of methods at our disposal, regression analysis emerged as our trusted compass, guiding us through the tumultuous waves of correlation and causation. As we navigated these statistical seas, we meticulously charted the trajectories of Rachel's allure and the ebb and flow of arson incidents in the vast terrain of Texas, seeking any glimmers of alignment that could enlighten our inquiry.

Moreover, to fortify our findings and fortify the foundation of our exploration, we weaved in elements of demographic analysis, considering the geographical, temporal, and socio-economic nuances that accentuated the backdrop of Rachel's ascendancy and arson's ominous prowling.

The culmination of this methodological amalgamation yielded a web of data that clothed our inquiry in a veil of evidence, ready to be unfurled in the revelatory illumination of statistical scrutiny. With a hint of daring and a zest for unearthing the unexpected, our approach straddled the divide between the rigorous and the riveting, bringing forth a study that not only seeks correlations but also takes delight in the serendipitous twists of statistical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Texas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9851658, r-squared of 0.9705517, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in the state of Texas. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team meticulously combed through records from 1985 to 2022. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold. Our findings suggest an intriguing connection that may kindle further inquiries into the enigmatic forces at play. This study not only sheds light on the curious intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a fiery flourish to the realm of statistical research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between names and their impact on individuals’ lives has long been a subject of interest and curiosity. The intertwining of nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has captivated the minds of researchers, sparking investigations into the potential influence of names on various aspects of human existence. In this vein, our research delves into the curious case of the first name Rachel and its possible association with the incidence of arson in the Lone Star State.
Texas, a state known for its resilience, barbecue, and expansive landscapes, also grapples with the complex issue of arson. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, carries significant consequences and has been a focal point of law enforcement efforts. As such, understanding the factors that may contribute to such criminal behavior is of utmost importance. With this in mind, our research seeks to explore an unconventional avenue – the correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the occurrence of arson in Texas.
The name Rachel, a timeless moniker exuding a sense of elegance and grace, has woven itself into the fabric of society, appearing across different time periods and cultural landscapes. Its enduring presence prompts one to ponder whether there is more to this name than meets the eye. Could it be possible, one may wonder, that the name Rachel exerts an unseen influence, stoking the flames of deviant behavior in the hearts of some? Our investigation sets out to shed light on this enigmatic possibility.
Leveraging extensive data sets from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team embarks on a journey through the annals of names and crime statistics. As we sift through years of records from 1985 to 2022, we aim to uncover any hints of a correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas. Employing rigorous statistical analyses, our pursuit is guided by an air of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we seek to untangle the potential threads that connect the captivating world of names with the solemn realm of criminal behavior.
As we embark on this captivating exploration, we do not merely seek to highlight an intriguing correlation. We also aim to add a spark of fascination to the landscape of statistical research, infusing the often solemn domain of data analysis with a burst of unconventional curiosity. Through our findings, we hope to provoke contemplation, inspire further inquiries, and perhaps even ignite a newfound appreciation for the intricate patterns that populate the tapestry of human experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas yielded some truly sizzling results. After meticulously analyzing the data from 1985 to 2022, we found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 between these two variables. This indicates a strong positive linear relationship, suggesting that as the popularity of the name Rachel increases, so does the incidence of arson in the Lone Star State.

The r-squared value of 0.9705517 further fuels our confidence in the relationship, indicating that a staggering 97.05517% of the variance in arson incidence can be explained by the popularity of the name Rachel. In other words, the name Rachel is like a match to the tinder of criminal behavior, igniting a significant proportion of the variation in arson rates.

Additionally, our analysis revealed a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the proposed connection between the name Rachel and arson in Texas.

Furthermore, our figure (Fig. 1) – a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson – visually illustrates the heat emanating from this relationship. The figure serves as a compelling visual aid, offering a fiery glimpse into the powerful association uncovered by our study.

In summary, our findings not only point to a remarkable correlation between the name Rachel and arson in Texas but also kindle further intrigue into the mysterious interplay of names and criminal behavior. This study adds a flaming hot dimension to the realm of statistical research, illuminating the captivating intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Texas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in the state of Texas. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team meticulously combed through records from 1985 to 2022. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold. Our findings suggest an intriguing connection that may kindle further inquiries into the enigmatic forces at play. This study not only sheds light on the curious intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a fiery flourish to the realm of statistical research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The search for connections between names and various outcomes has taken researchers down numerous intriguing paths, from the influence of names on career success to their potential impact on romantic relationships. The interplay of nomenclature and societal phenomena continues to pique the interest of scholars, leading to unconventional investigations that unearth unexpected correlations and spark lively debates. As we turn our attention to the curious case of the first name Rachel and its alleged association with arson in the state of Texas, we step into a realm where statistical rigor meets the whimsical musings of the human mind.
In "Name Associations and Societal Impacts," Smith explores the intricate ways in which names can intertwine with individuals' behaviors and choices, delving into the underlying mechanisms that may shape the trajectory of one's life. While the focus of the study may not explicitly center on arson, it lays the groundwork for contemplating the potential influence of a name such as Rachel on the actions of its bearers. Furthermore, Doe's examination in "The Psychological Significance of Names" unveils the psychological underpinnings of name perception, offering insights into the subconscious associations and biases that may underpin individuals' responses to different names, a factor that may unknowingly play a role in the purported connection between the popularity of the name Rachel and incidents of arson.
Jones' work, "Names and Criminal Behavior: A Statistical Analysis," brings the spotlight onto the correlation between names and criminal activities, with a particular focus on arson. Though the study does not specifically investigate the name Rachel, it indirectly lays the groundwork for considering the potential influences of nomenclature on criminal behavior, setting the stage for our own investigation.
As we venture further into the literary landscape, we encounter a myriad of non-fiction works that explore the psychology of naming and the complexities of human behavior. Books such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner and "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell offer nuanced perspectives on the unseen factors that shape human decision-making, inviting a consideration of how names may subtly influence individuals' actions and choices. Drawing from the rich tapestry of fiction, novels such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Night Circus" by Erin Morgenstern infuse the theme of names with an air of mystique and intrigue, hinting at the enigmatic forces that names may hold in the realm of human experience.
Furthermore, board games such as "Clue" and "Mysterium" provide a playful backdrop for contemplating the mysterious connections that may underlie seemingly unrelated elements, offering a lighthearted lens through which to approach our exploration of the potential link between the name Rachel and arson in Texas. While these sources may not directly align with our specific inquiry, they imbue the scholarly pursuit with a touch of whimsy, encouraging a multidimensional engagement with the research topic.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas yielded some truly sizzling results. After meticulously analyzing the data from 1985 to 2022, we found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 between these two variables. This indicates a strong positive linear relationship, suggesting that as the popularity of the name Rachel increases, so does the incidence of arson in the Lone Star State.
The r-squared value of 0.9705517 further fuels our confidence in the relationship, indicating that a staggering 97.05517% of the variance in arson incidence can be explained by the popularity of the name Rachel. In other words, the name Rachel is like a match to the tinder of criminal behavior, igniting a significant proportion of the variation in arson rates.
Additionally, our analysis revealed a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the proposed connection between the name Rachel and arson in Texas.
Furthermore, our figure (Fig. 1) – a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson – visually illustrates the heat emanating from this relationship. The figure serves as a compelling visual aid, offering a fiery glimpse into the powerful association uncovered by our study.
In summary, our findings not only point to a remarkable correlation between the name Rachel and arson in Texas but also kindle further intrigue into the mysterious interplay of names and criminal behavior. This study adds a flaming hot dimension to the realm of statistical research, illuminating the captivating intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The scorching correlation coefficient uncovered in our study adds fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding the potential influence of nomenclature on criminal behavior, particularly in the context of arson. The findings not only align with prior research by Jones, which delves into the correlation between names and criminal activities, but also build upon the theoretical groundwork laid by Smith in investigating the intricate ways in which names intertwine with individuals' behaviors and choices.

The high r-squared value of 0.9705517 suggests that the popularity of the name Rachel can explain a staggering 97.05517% of the variance in arson incidence in the state of Texas. This finding offers a scintillating glimpse into the profound impact of nomenclature on criminal behavior, akin to the striking glow of a well-fueled fire. Our results align with the psychological underpinnings of name perception as elucidated by Doe, hinting at the subconscious associations and biases that may underpin individuals' responses to different names, including their potential role in driving criminal actions.

While our study may not directly address the playful musings of board games such as "Clue" and "Mysterium," which highlight the mysterious connections that underlie seemingly unrelated elements, it adds a touch of whimsy by exposing an unexpected correlation between the name Rachel and incidents of arson in Texas. This unexpected twist ignites further curiosity and underscores the multidimensional engagement with the research topic.

In summary, our findings not only add a flaming hot dimension to the realm of statistical research but also kindle further intrigue into the enigmatic forces at play in the intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds. This study not only shines a light on the curious interplay between names and societal phenomena but blazes a trail for future investigations into the intriguing connections that lie beneath the seemingly innocuous domain of nomenclature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rachel and Arson in Texas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in the state of Texas. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team meticulously combed through records from 1985 to 2022. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold. Our findings suggest an intriguing connection that may kindle further inquiries into the enigmatic forces at play. This study not only sheds light on the curious intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a fiery flourish to the realm of statistical research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between names and their impact on individuals’ lives has long been a subject of interest and curiosity. The intertwining of nomenclature and behavioral tendencies has captivated the minds of researchers, sparking investigations into the potential influence of names on various aspects of human existence. In this vein, our research delves into the curious case of the first name Rachel and its possible association with the incidence of arson in the Lone Star State.
Texas, a state known for its resilience, barbecue, and expansive landscapes, also grapples with the complex issue of arson. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, carries significant consequences and has been a focal point of law enforcement efforts. As such, understanding the factors that may contribute to such criminal behavior is of utmost importance. With this in mind, our research seeks to explore an unconventional avenue – the correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the occurrence of arson in Texas.
The name Rachel, a timeless moniker exuding a sense of elegance and grace, has woven itself into the fabric of society, appearing across different time periods and cultural landscapes. Its enduring presence prompts one to ponder whether there is more to this name than meets the eye. Could it be possible, one may wonder, that the name Rachel exerts an unseen influence, stoking the flames of deviant behavior in the hearts of some? Our investigation sets out to shed light on this enigmatic possibility.
Leveraging extensive data sets from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team embarks on a journey through the annals of names and crime statistics. As we sift through years of records from 1985 to 2022, we aim to uncover any hints of a correlation between the popularity of the name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas. Employing rigorous statistical analyses, our pursuit is guided by an air of curiosity and a touch of whimsy, as we seek to untangle the potential threads that connect the captivating world of names with the solemn realm of criminal behavior.
As we embark on this captivating exploration, we do not merely seek to highlight an intriguing correlation. We also aim to add a spark of fascination to the landscape of statistical research, infusing the often solemn domain of data analysis with a burst of unconventional curiosity. Through our findings, we hope to provoke contemplation, inspire further inquiries, and perhaps even ignite a newfound appreciation for the intricate patterns that populate the tapestry of human experience.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas yielded some truly sizzling results. After meticulously analyzing the data from 1985 to 2022, we found a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 between these two variables. This indicates a strong positive linear relationship, suggesting that as the popularity of the name Rachel increases, so does the incidence of arson in the Lone Star State.
The r-squared value of 0.9705517 further fuels our confidence in the relationship, indicating that a staggering 97.05517% of the variance in arson incidence can be explained by the popularity of the name Rachel. In other words, the name Rachel is like a match to the tinder of criminal behavior, igniting a significant proportion of the variation in arson rates.
Additionally, our analysis revealed a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold, providing compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the proposed connection between the name Rachel and arson in Texas.
Furthermore, our figure (Fig. 1) – a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson – visually illustrates the heat emanating from this relationship. The figure serves as a compelling visual aid, offering a fiery glimpse into the powerful association uncovered by our study.
In summary, our findings not only point to a remarkable correlation between the name Rachel and arson in Texas but also kindle further intrigue into the mysterious interplay of names and criminal behavior. This study adds a flaming hot dimension to the realm of statistical research, illuminating the captivating intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the fiery conclusion of our sizzling investigation, the scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 has illuminated the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in Texas. The r-squared value of 0.9705517 has further fueled our confidence in this incendiary relationship, indicating that the name Rachel contributes to the ignition of a staggering 97.05517% of the variance in arson rates.

Our findings suggest that the name Rachel is not merely a moniker; it is a potential catalyst for combustion, sparking a significant proportion of the variation in arson incidence. The compelling evidence provided by the p-value, which gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold, ignites further curiosity and beckons researchers to explore the underlying mechanisms of this enigmatic connection.

Furthermore, our study not only sheds light on the captivating intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a blazing dimension to the landscape of statistical research. Our findings underscore the intricate patterns that populate the tapestry of human experience and provide a flaming hot example of the unexpected correlations that can emerge from data analysis.

In conclusion, our research stokes the flames of curiosity and adds a spark of fascination to the world of statistical inquiry. It is our fervent hope that this study will ignite further inquiries and inspire a newfound appreciation for the captivating interplay of names and criminal behavior. Given the incendiary nature of our findings, we assert that no further research in this area is needed, as our results blaze a trail of insight into the searing connection between the first name Rachel and arson in Texas.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Fiery Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Pyrotechnic Studies and Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Rachel Arson Connection: A Flaming Hot Analysis with an abstract of This study aimed to investigate the potential link between the popularity of the first name Rachel and the incidence of arson in the state of Texas. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team meticulously combed through records from 1985 to 2022. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9851658 and a p-value that gleefully danced under the 0.01 threshold. Our findings suggest an intriguing connection that may kindle further inquiries into the enigmatic forces at play. This study not only sheds light on the curious intersection of nomenclature and nefarious deeds but also adds a fiery flourish to the realm of statistical research.

ChatGPT:

Rachel, arson, correlation, popularity, first name, Texas, Social Security Administration, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, enigmatic forces, nomenclature, nefarious deeds

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Rachel
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Rachel
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Rachel

Arson in Texas
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Texas
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Texas

Correlation r = 0.9851658 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9705517 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Texas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Rachel) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0. 0.0000000000000000000000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 631
inf random variables
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 633
You don't actually need
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 638

Notice: Undefined offset: 10 in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 567
INF variables to find a correlation like this one.
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 638
I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 641


In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.97, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Rachel (Babies born)164391551215707154071546315749163731586415999155151607516143138211222811648106979562895780046952623155454843408835913020266124242321209319361879161915621547130312691247
Arson in Texas (Arson rate)5053.850.756.257.958.157.955.156.153.750.752.845.242.942.239.539.538.134.729.729.627.824.72624.221.919.71714.914.212.912.611.79.48.510.2109.7




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([16439,15512,15707,15407,15463,15749,16373,15864,15999,15515,16075,16143,13821,12228,11648,10697,9562,8957,8004,6952,6231,5545,4843,4088,3591,3020,2661,2424,2321,2093,1936,1879,1619,1562,1547,1303,1269,1247,])
array_2 = np.array([50,53.8,50.7,56.2,57.9,58.1,57.9,55.1,56.1,53.7,50.7,52.8,45.2,42.9,42.2,39.5,39.5,38.1,34.7,29.7,29.6,27.8,24.7,26,24.2,21.9,19.7,17,14.9,14.2,12.9,12.6,11.7,9.4,8.5,10.2,10,9.7,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Rachel"
array_2_name = "Arson in Texas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1317 · Black Variable ID: 2006 · Red Variable ID: 20072
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0