about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,316 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Milk consumption and the second variable is Arson in Oklahoma.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Cow tipping became less popular, leading to a downturn in Milk consumption. With fewer people sneaking around farms at night, there was a corresponding decrease in opportunities for udder destruction. As a result, the overall Milk supply decreased, creating a shortage. This shortage led to higher Milk prices, making it harder for individuals to afford enough Milk to fuel their late-night cereal cravings. Without a full Moo-urning meal, people lacked the dairy-induced energy to carry out their nefarious fire-starting plans. In essence, the lack of Milk put a damper on the potential for dairy-ous arson in Oklahoma.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a quaint Oklahoma town with a surreal twist. Show a serene, sunlit street where fewer people are clutching milk cartons. Upbeat children play amidst the cheerful atmosphere, while adults engage in outdoor activities. Notice a reduction in accidental fires, with relaxed firefighters and their parked trucks nearby. Portray a sense of relief and safety in the community, as the decreased lactose consumption diminishes the risk of spontaneous combustion. Capture the magic realism of this scene with a touch of wonder and mystery. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because the decrease in milk consumption led to fewer people getting their daily dose of vitamin D, resulting in less spontaneous combustion from highly concentrated lactose in their systems, thereby reducing the number of accidental fires in Oklahoma.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Vaporwave 3D Pixar Style Steampunk Magic realism
ChatGPT: Magic realism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because the decrease in milk consumption led to fewer people getting their daily dose of vitamin D, resulting in less spontaneous combustion from highly concentrated lactose in their systems, thereby reducing the number of accidental fires in Oklahoma.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Oklahoma, you see fewer people holding cartons of milk as they walk down the street. The sunny, cheerful atmosphere shows children playing outside and adults enjoying outdoor activities. You notice a decrease in the occurrence of accidental fires, with firefighters relaxing in the shade, their trucks parked nearby. There's a sense of relief and safety in the community, thanks to the reduced risk of spontaneous combustion due to decreased lactose consumption.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Magic realism ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Oklahoma, you see fewer people holding cartons of milk as they walk down the street. The sunny, cheerful atmosphere shows children playing outside and adults enjoying outdoor activities. You notice a decrease in the occurrence of accidental fires, with firefighters relaxing in the shade, their trucks parked nearby. There's a sense of relief and safety in the community, thanks to the reduced risk of spontaneous combustion due to decreased lactose consumption. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a quaint Oklahoma town with a surreal twist. Show a serene, sunlit street where fewer people are clutching milk cartons. Upbeat children play amidst the cheerful atmosphere, while adults engage in outdoor activities. Notice a reduction in accidental fires, with relaxed firefighters and their parked trucks nearby. Portray a sense of relief and safety in the community, as the decreased lactose consumption diminishes the risk of spontaneous combustion. Capture the magic realism of this scene with a touch of wonder and mystery.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Milk consumption caused Arson in Oklahoma to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma

Journal of Dairy-Driven Deviance

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the consumption of milk has been under scrutiny not only for its effects on human health but also for its potential correlation with criminal activities. This study investigates the peculiar relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for milk consumption and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for arson incidents from 1990 to 2021, we applied statistical analysis to unveil the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between milk consumption and arson. This curious correlation prompts further exploration into the potential psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The implications of this study extend beyond the dairy industry, igniting a fresh perspective on the interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the consumption of milk has been under scrutiny not only for its effects on human health but also for its potential correlation with criminal activities. This study investigates the peculiar relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for milk consumption and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for arson incidents from 1990 to 2021, we applied statistical analysis to unveil the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between milk consumption and arson. This curious correlation prompts further exploration into the potential psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The implications of this study extend beyond the dairy industry, igniting a fresh perspective on the interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The timeless question of "Got Milk?" has permeated our cultural lexicon, inviting us to ponder the importance of milk in our daily lives. While discussions have predominantly focused on its nutritional benefits or lack thereof, the less explored territory of milk’s potential influence on criminal behaviors has emerged. In this pursuit, we delve into the curious and combustible intersection of milk consumption and arson in the state of Oklahoma.

The confluence of dairy intake and fire-related incidents presents a notably peculiar juxtaposition, reminiscent of the old adage that there might indeed be something "suspicious" about milk. As the proverbial smoke clears, we embark on an academic odyssey to scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.

The correlation between milk consumption and arson presents a statistically significant quandary, akin to a flame that refuses to extinguish. Our endeavor centers on investigating this enigmatic relationship to discern whether milk consumption acts as a catalyst for fiery behavior or if, perchance, it simply serves as a udderly coincidental accomplice in the conflagration of criminal activities.

As researchers, we are reminded of the fundamental principle of causation versus correlation, and the precautious reminder that "correlation does not imply causation" merely adds fuel to the scientific inferno. Yet, it is our scholarly duty to straddle the line between analysis and amusement, continually vigilant for any potential statistical anomalies that may milk our curiosity.

Through the usage of comprehensive data sets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have embarked on this whimsical journey to unravel the intricate connection between milk consumption and the all-consuming passion for arson. Our findings extend far beyond mere scholarly intrigue and ignite an urgency for further probing into the psychological and sociological influences of dairy products on arson proclivities.

Join us as we embark on a quest to demystify the fiery behavioral conundrum and shed light on the flammable link between milk consumption and arson in Oklahoma. The dairy industry may find itself churning in anticipation while we endeavor to spark a cheese-laden conversation about the curious interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the consumption of milk has been under scrutiny not only for its effects on human health but also for its potential correlation with criminal activities. This study investigates the peculiar relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for milk consumption and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for arson incidents from 1990 to 2021, we applied statistical analysis to unveil the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between milk consumption and arson. This curious correlation prompts further exploration into the potential psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The implications of this study extend beyond the dairy industry, igniting a fresh perspective on the interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The timeless question of "Got Milk?" has permeated our cultural lexicon, inviting us to ponder the importance of milk in our daily lives. While discussions have predominantly focused on its nutritional benefits or lack thereof, the less explored territory of milk’s potential influence on criminal behaviors has emerged. In this pursuit, we delve into the curious and combustible intersection of milk consumption and arson in the state of Oklahoma.
The confluence of dairy intake and fire-related incidents presents a notably peculiar juxtaposition, reminiscent of the old adage that there might indeed be something "suspicious" about milk. As the proverbial smoke clears, we embark on an academic odyssey to scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
The correlation between milk consumption and arson presents a statistically significant quandary, akin to a flame that refuses to extinguish. Our endeavor centers on investigating this enigmatic relationship to discern whether milk consumption acts as a catalyst for fiery behavior or if, perchance, it simply serves as a udderly coincidental accomplice in the conflagration of criminal activities.
As researchers, we are reminded of the fundamental principle of causation versus correlation, and the precautious reminder that "correlation does not imply causation" merely adds fuel to the scientific inferno. Yet, it is our scholarly duty to straddle the line between analysis and amusement, continually vigilant for any potential statistical anomalies that may milk our curiosity.
Through the usage of comprehensive data sets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have embarked on this whimsical journey to unravel the intricate connection between milk consumption and the all-consuming passion for arson. Our findings extend far beyond mere scholarly intrigue and ignite an urgency for further probing into the psychological and sociological influences of dairy products on arson proclivities.
Join us as we embark on a quest to demystify the fiery behavioral conundrum and shed light on the flammable link between milk consumption and arson in Oklahoma. The dairy industry may find itself churning in anticipation while we endeavor to spark a cheese-laden conversation about the curious interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The link between milk consumption and criminal behavior has remained an uncharted territory for academic exploration, overshadowed by broader discussions of dietary impacts on health and well-being. This literature review seeks to fill the void by surveying existing research and shedding light on the peculiar correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma.

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of dairy product consumption patterns and their potential influence on criminal activities in urban populations. Their study, though primarily focused on cheese consumption, alludes to intriguing findings that hint at a broader connection between dairy intake and non-violent offenses. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) delves into the psychological implications of dietary habits, exploring the subconscious impact of dairy products on human behavior. While neither study explicitly addresses the specific nexus of milk consumption and arson, their findings lay a foundational understanding of the potential interplay between dietary choices and criminal proclivities.

Expanding the purview beyond academic research, Jones (2020) presents a compelling case for reevaluating the societal perception of milk as an innocuous beverage. Drawing on anthropological and historical evidence, Jones uncovers the cultural significance of milk in igniting controversy and inciting radical acts, alluding to an underlying sociological undercurrent with implications for criminal activities.

In "Milk: The White Poison" (2011), the authors present a scathing critique of the dairy industry, shedding light on the obscured repercussions of milk consumption, both on physical health and, quite possibly, on mental well-being. While the focus remains on the physiological effects, the implications for behavioral changes and potential criminal tendencies are left unexplored, teasing at the untapped dimension of dairy's impact on human behavior.

Turning to fictional literature, the popular novel "The Curious Case of the Combustible Cow" introduces a whimsical narrative where a peculiar bovine phenomenon sparks rambunctious antics, drawing subtle parallels to the enigmatic connection between milk consumption and incendiary activities. Similarly, "Firestarter's Diary" delves into the tumultuous escapades of a dairy farmer's daughter with an uncanny ability to unintentionally spark flames, metaphorically encapsulating the mysterious allure of milk's potential influence on arson incidents.

Amidst the scholarly discourse, social media platforms have become a fertile ground for casual observations that offer inadvertent insights. In a tweet by @DairyMysteries, an individual humorously quips, "Maybe it's not just the financial burden of milk consumption, but its combustible properties that are setting our wallets and homes ablaze! #MilkMysteries." While intended as a jest, such casual musings hint at a subliminal awareness of the confounding association between milk and unexpected fire-related incidents.

The convergence of academic literature, fictional narratives, and informal musings reflects the multifaceted nature of the correlation between milk consumption and arson, underscoring its potential far-reaching implications. As we navigate through this diverse landscape of evidence and conjecture, it becomes increasingly evident that the intersection of dairy products and criminal behavior holds sway over the scholarly imagination, inviting a nuanced and eclectic approach to unraveling the enigmatic link.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the consumption of milk has been under scrutiny not only for its effects on human health but also for its potential correlation with criminal activities. This study investigates the peculiar relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for milk consumption and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for arson incidents from 1990 to 2021, we applied statistical analysis to unveil the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between milk consumption and arson. This curious correlation prompts further exploration into the potential psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The implications of this study extend beyond the dairy industry, igniting a fresh perspective on the interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The timeless question of "Got Milk?" has permeated our cultural lexicon, inviting us to ponder the importance of milk in our daily lives. While discussions have predominantly focused on its nutritional benefits or lack thereof, the less explored territory of milk’s potential influence on criminal behaviors has emerged. In this pursuit, we delve into the curious and combustible intersection of milk consumption and arson in the state of Oklahoma.
The confluence of dairy intake and fire-related incidents presents a notably peculiar juxtaposition, reminiscent of the old adage that there might indeed be something "suspicious" about milk. As the proverbial smoke clears, we embark on an academic odyssey to scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
The correlation between milk consumption and arson presents a statistically significant quandary, akin to a flame that refuses to extinguish. Our endeavor centers on investigating this enigmatic relationship to discern whether milk consumption acts as a catalyst for fiery behavior or if, perchance, it simply serves as a udderly coincidental accomplice in the conflagration of criminal activities.
As researchers, we are reminded of the fundamental principle of causation versus correlation, and the precautious reminder that "correlation does not imply causation" merely adds fuel to the scientific inferno. Yet, it is our scholarly duty to straddle the line between analysis and amusement, continually vigilant for any potential statistical anomalies that may milk our curiosity.
Through the usage of comprehensive data sets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have embarked on this whimsical journey to unravel the intricate connection between milk consumption and the all-consuming passion for arson. Our findings extend far beyond mere scholarly intrigue and ignite an urgency for further probing into the psychological and sociological influences of dairy products on arson proclivities.
Join us as we embark on a quest to demystify the fiery behavioral conundrum and shed light on the flammable link between milk consumption and arson in Oklahoma. The dairy industry may find itself churning in anticipation while we endeavor to spark a cheese-laden conversation about the curious interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To unravel the enigmatic correlation between milk consumption and arson in the state of Oklahoma, we employed a blend of statistical analysis, data manipulation, and a pinch of whimsy. Our research team embarked on this endeavor with both diligence and a strong sense of curiosity, recognizing the need for robust methodologies to address such a peculiar juxtaposition.

Data Collection:
Data on milk consumption in Oklahoma from 1990 to 2021 was sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). This data allowed us to track the annual per capita consumption of milk in various forms, from whole to skim, acknowledging the diverse dairy preferences of the population.

In tandem, arson incident data for the corresponding time period was extracted from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. This comprehensive dataset facilitated the examination of fire-related crimes, including the proximity to dairy farms, leading us to mull over the potential influence of the bovine presence on incendiary activities.

Statistical Analysis:
Braving the statistical wilderness, we harnessed the power of correlation analysis to scrutinize the relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents. Our team utilized Pearson's correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The statistical software used for this analysis was akin to a trusty lab assistant, enabling us to navigate the labyrinth of data with precision and a touch of scientific bravado.

Further, we conducted regression analysis to discern the extent to which changes in milk consumption corresponded to variations in arson incidents. Through this method, we teased out the nuances of the interplay between dairy intake and fiery felonies, acknowledging that unraveling complex relationships often requires a splash of creativity, much like crafting a fine yogurt parfait.

Control Variables:
In our robust exploration, we were mindful of potential confounding variables that may distort the observed correlation. Factors such as climate conditions, population demographics, and the proximity of fire stations to dairy farms were given due consideration, seeking to discern the essence of the milk-fire relationship amidst a cacophony of potential influencers.

Ethical Considerations:
As responsible researchers, we ensured that all data utilized in our study complied with ethical guidelines and data protection regulations, mindful that even the most curious correlations should be scrutinized with ethical integrity. The tantalizing nature of the milk-arson correlation did not overshadow the importance of ethical conduct in scientific inquiry, serving as a sober reminder that scientific endeavors should always adhere to ethical principles, lest we find ourselves in a statistical churn of disrepute.

In conclusion, our exploratory voyage into the heart of milk consumption and arson incidents in Oklahoma was guided by both rigor and an unshakable sense of wonder. The methodologies employed reflect our commitment to unraveling the offbeat, stirring the pot of scientific inquiry, and striving to unveil the intriguing connection between dairy habits and criminal behaviors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9352275, r-squared of 0.8746505, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the consumption of milk has been under scrutiny not only for its effects on human health but also for its potential correlation with criminal activities. This study investigates the peculiar relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for milk consumption and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for arson incidents from 1990 to 2021, we applied statistical analysis to unveil the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between milk consumption and arson. This curious correlation prompts further exploration into the potential psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The implications of this study extend beyond the dairy industry, igniting a fresh perspective on the interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The timeless question of "Got Milk?" has permeated our cultural lexicon, inviting us to ponder the importance of milk in our daily lives. While discussions have predominantly focused on its nutritional benefits or lack thereof, the less explored territory of milk’s potential influence on criminal behaviors has emerged. In this pursuit, we delve into the curious and combustible intersection of milk consumption and arson in the state of Oklahoma.
The confluence of dairy intake and fire-related incidents presents a notably peculiar juxtaposition, reminiscent of the old adage that there might indeed be something "suspicious" about milk. As the proverbial smoke clears, we embark on an academic odyssey to scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
The correlation between milk consumption and arson presents a statistically significant quandary, akin to a flame that refuses to extinguish. Our endeavor centers on investigating this enigmatic relationship to discern whether milk consumption acts as a catalyst for fiery behavior or if, perchance, it simply serves as a udderly coincidental accomplice in the conflagration of criminal activities.
As researchers, we are reminded of the fundamental principle of causation versus correlation, and the precautious reminder that "correlation does not imply causation" merely adds fuel to the scientific inferno. Yet, it is our scholarly duty to straddle the line between analysis and amusement, continually vigilant for any potential statistical anomalies that may milk our curiosity.
Through the usage of comprehensive data sets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have embarked on this whimsical journey to unravel the intricate connection between milk consumption and the all-consuming passion for arson. Our findings extend far beyond mere scholarly intrigue and ignite an urgency for further probing into the psychological and sociological influences of dairy products on arson proclivities.
Join us as we embark on a quest to demystify the fiery behavioral conundrum and shed light on the flammable link between milk consumption and arson in Oklahoma. The dairy industry may find itself churning in anticipation while we endeavor to spark a cheese-laden conversation about the curious interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

RESULTS

Correlation Analysis
Upon conducting statistical analysis, our research team uncovered a notable correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents in Oklahoma from 1990 to 2021. The Pearson correlation coefficient yielded a striking value of 0.9352275, indicating a robust positive correlation between the two variables. This significant correlation coefficient suggests that as milk consumption increased, so did the incidence of arson, thereby fueling the flames of curiosity surrounding this curious association.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8746505, indicating that approximately 87.5% of the variation in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. This finding underscores the substantial proportion of variability in arson occurrences that can be elucidated by fluctuations in milk consumption, perhaps suggesting that milk may indeed be a fiery instigator in the state of Oklahoma.

Moreover, the calculated p-value was less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of the correlation between milk consumption and arson. This p-value underscores the likelihood that the observed correlation is not due to mere chance, but rather reflects a substantive relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.

Figure 1 (to be included) depicts a scatterplot unveiling the compelling relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents. The figure visually encapsulates the stark positive correlation revealed by our analysis, serving as a visual testament to the incendiary link between these two variables.

These results uncloak a peculiar and flammable connection between milk consumption and arson in Oklahoma, beckoning further exploration into the potential mechanisms underpinning this unlikely relationship. As the proverbial smoke clears, it becomes evident that the enigmatic interplay between dairy products and fiery proclivities warrants a closer investigation, sparking a fresh perspective on the potential influences of dietary habits on criminal behaviors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the consumption of milk has been under scrutiny not only for its effects on human health but also for its potential correlation with criminal activities. This study investigates the peculiar relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for milk consumption and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for arson incidents from 1990 to 2021, we applied statistical analysis to unveil the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between milk consumption and arson. This curious correlation prompts further exploration into the potential psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The implications of this study extend beyond the dairy industry, igniting a fresh perspective on the interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The link between milk consumption and criminal behavior has remained an uncharted territory for academic exploration, overshadowed by broader discussions of dietary impacts on health and well-being. This literature review seeks to fill the void by surveying existing research and shedding light on the peculiar correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma.
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of dairy product consumption patterns and their potential influence on criminal activities in urban populations. Their study, though primarily focused on cheese consumption, alludes to intriguing findings that hint at a broader connection between dairy intake and non-violent offenses. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) delves into the psychological implications of dietary habits, exploring the subconscious impact of dairy products on human behavior. While neither study explicitly addresses the specific nexus of milk consumption and arson, their findings lay a foundational understanding of the potential interplay between dietary choices and criminal proclivities.
Expanding the purview beyond academic research, Jones (2020) presents a compelling case for reevaluating the societal perception of milk as an innocuous beverage. Drawing on anthropological and historical evidence, Jones uncovers the cultural significance of milk in igniting controversy and inciting radical acts, alluding to an underlying sociological undercurrent with implications for criminal activities.
In "Milk: The White Poison" (2011), the authors present a scathing critique of the dairy industry, shedding light on the obscured repercussions of milk consumption, both on physical health and, quite possibly, on mental well-being. While the focus remains on the physiological effects, the implications for behavioral changes and potential criminal tendencies are left unexplored, teasing at the untapped dimension of dairy's impact on human behavior.
Turning to fictional literature, the popular novel "The Curious Case of the Combustible Cow" introduces a whimsical narrative where a peculiar bovine phenomenon sparks rambunctious antics, drawing subtle parallels to the enigmatic connection between milk consumption and incendiary activities. Similarly, "Firestarter's Diary" delves into the tumultuous escapades of a dairy farmer's daughter with an uncanny ability to unintentionally spark flames, metaphorically encapsulating the mysterious allure of milk's potential influence on arson incidents.
Amidst the scholarly discourse, social media platforms have become a fertile ground for casual observations that offer inadvertent insights. In a tweet by @DairyMysteries, an individual humorously quips, "Maybe it's not just the financial burden of milk consumption, but its combustible properties that are setting our wallets and homes ablaze! #MilkMysteries." While intended as a jest, such casual musings hint at a subliminal awareness of the confounding association between milk and unexpected fire-related incidents.
The convergence of academic literature, fictional narratives, and informal musings reflects the multifaceted nature of the correlation between milk consumption and arson, underscoring its potential far-reaching implications. As we navigate through this diverse landscape of evidence and conjecture, it becomes increasingly evident that the intersection of dairy products and criminal behavior holds sway over the scholarly imagination, inviting a nuanced and eclectic approach to unraveling the enigmatic link.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
Correlation Analysis
Upon conducting statistical analysis, our research team uncovered a notable correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents in Oklahoma from 1990 to 2021. The Pearson correlation coefficient yielded a striking value of 0.9352275, indicating a robust positive correlation between the two variables. This significant correlation coefficient suggests that as milk consumption increased, so did the incidence of arson, thereby fueling the flames of curiosity surrounding this curious association.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8746505, indicating that approximately 87.5% of the variation in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. This finding underscores the substantial proportion of variability in arson occurrences that can be elucidated by fluctuations in milk consumption, perhaps suggesting that milk may indeed be a fiery instigator in the state of Oklahoma.
Moreover, the calculated p-value was less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of the correlation between milk consumption and arson. This p-value underscores the likelihood that the observed correlation is not due to mere chance, but rather reflects a substantive relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
Figure 1 (to be included) depicts a scatterplot unveiling the compelling relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents. The figure visually encapsulates the stark positive correlation revealed by our analysis, serving as a visual testament to the incendiary link between these two variables.
These results uncloak a peculiar and flammable connection between milk consumption and arson in Oklahoma, beckoning further exploration into the potential mechanisms underpinning this unlikely relationship. As the proverbial smoke clears, it becomes evident that the enigmatic interplay between dairy products and fiery proclivities warrants a closer investigation, sparking a fresh perspective on the potential influences of dietary habits on criminal behaviors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The discovery of a substantial positive correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents in Oklahoma from 1990 to 2021 corroborates the peculiar suppositions of previous studies. Smith et al.'s investigation into cheese consumption patterns, although seemingly cheesy itself, hinted at the dairy-crime continuum. Indeed, what appeared to be mere "grate" distinctions in dairy derivatives may harbor broader implications for criminal inclinations. Similarly, Jones' discourse on the contentious nature of milk and its societal repercussions ironically found resonance in our statistically significant findings. A "churn" in perspectives on the potential impact of dairy products on behavioral propensities is warranted, as it seems dairy's influence could extend beyond mere lactose angst.

Our results resonate with the subtle musings of @DairyMysteries that, though seemingly flippant, now acquire an unexpected weight of substantiation. The tantalizing prospect of milk's combustible properties setting off financial burdens and homes ablaze, while once a passing jest, now fuels serious contemplation on the convoluted association between dairy and incendiary mishaps.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the study scope, offering an unanticipated perspective on the intersection of dietary habits and criminal proclivities. The tantalizing possibility of milk acting as a catalytic agent in igniting fiery tendencies prompts an indelible shift in the paradigms of forensic nutrition. As our research kindles fresh perspectives on the combustible potential of milk consumption, it opens new avenues for reevaluating the innocuous veneer of dairy products and their unsuspected influence on incendiary activities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma

[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the consumption of milk has been under scrutiny not only for its effects on human health but also for its potential correlation with criminal activities. This study investigates the peculiar relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for milk consumption and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for arson incidents from 1990 to 2021, we applied statistical analysis to unveil the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between milk consumption and arson. This curious correlation prompts further exploration into the potential psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The implications of this study extend beyond the dairy industry, igniting a fresh perspective on the interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The timeless question of "Got Milk?" has permeated our cultural lexicon, inviting us to ponder the importance of milk in our daily lives. While discussions have predominantly focused on its nutritional benefits or lack thereof, the less explored territory of milk’s potential influence on criminal behaviors has emerged. In this pursuit, we delve into the curious and combustible intersection of milk consumption and arson in the state of Oklahoma.
The confluence of dairy intake and fire-related incidents presents a notably peculiar juxtaposition, reminiscent of the old adage that there might indeed be something "suspicious" about milk. As the proverbial smoke clears, we embark on an academic odyssey to scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
The correlation between milk consumption and arson presents a statistically significant quandary, akin to a flame that refuses to extinguish. Our endeavor centers on investigating this enigmatic relationship to discern whether milk consumption acts as a catalyst for fiery behavior or if, perchance, it simply serves as a udderly coincidental accomplice in the conflagration of criminal activities.
As researchers, we are reminded of the fundamental principle of causation versus correlation, and the precautious reminder that "correlation does not imply causation" merely adds fuel to the scientific inferno. Yet, it is our scholarly duty to straddle the line between analysis and amusement, continually vigilant for any potential statistical anomalies that may milk our curiosity.
Through the usage of comprehensive data sets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have embarked on this whimsical journey to unravel the intricate connection between milk consumption and the all-consuming passion for arson. Our findings extend far beyond mere scholarly intrigue and ignite an urgency for further probing into the psychological and sociological influences of dairy products on arson proclivities.
Join us as we embark on a quest to demystify the fiery behavioral conundrum and shed light on the flammable link between milk consumption and arson in Oklahoma. The dairy industry may find itself churning in anticipation while we endeavor to spark a cheese-laden conversation about the curious interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
Correlation Analysis
Upon conducting statistical analysis, our research team uncovered a notable correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents in Oklahoma from 1990 to 2021. The Pearson correlation coefficient yielded a striking value of 0.9352275, indicating a robust positive correlation between the two variables. This significant correlation coefficient suggests that as milk consumption increased, so did the incidence of arson, thereby fueling the flames of curiosity surrounding this curious association.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8746505, indicating that approximately 87.5% of the variation in arson incidents can be explained by variations in milk consumption. This finding underscores the substantial proportion of variability in arson occurrences that can be elucidated by fluctuations in milk consumption, perhaps suggesting that milk may indeed be a fiery instigator in the state of Oklahoma.
Moreover, the calculated p-value was less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of the correlation between milk consumption and arson. This p-value underscores the likelihood that the observed correlation is not due to mere chance, but rather reflects a substantive relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
Figure 1 (to be included) depicts a scatterplot unveiling the compelling relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents. The figure visually encapsulates the stark positive correlation revealed by our analysis, serving as a visual testament to the incendiary link between these two variables.
These results uncloak a peculiar and flammable connection between milk consumption and arson in Oklahoma, beckoning further exploration into the potential mechanisms underpinning this unlikely relationship. As the proverbial smoke clears, it becomes evident that the enigmatic interplay between dairy products and fiery proclivities warrants a closer investigation, sparking a fresh perspective on the potential influences of dietary habits on criminal behaviors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study illuminate a rather enchanting correlation between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. The pronounced positive correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 not only raises eyebrows but also sparks curiosity surrounding the potential influence of dairy products on incendiary tendencies. The likelihood that this correlation is not just a fluke but a substantive relationship indeed adds fuel to the scientific inferno, leaving us with more questions than answers.

One cannot help but mull over the curious image of a milk carton with the caption "missing: consumed by arsonist" as we grapple with the implications of our results. The statistical significance of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables raises a myriad of puns about "playing with fire" and "moo-difying criminal behavior."

These findings incite a udder sense of urgency for further investigation into the psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the potential impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The potential mechanisms underpinning this peculiar relationship beg for thorough examination, as we resist the temptation to milk any more puns out of this data.

In light of these results, it is clear that no further research in this area is needed, as we have sufficiently ignited a conversation about the flammable link between milk consumption and arson. It seems that, for now, we may have finally answered the query, "Got Milk? More like, Got Matches?"

Thank you for the opportunity to boldly go where no dairy-related study has gone before.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Dairy-Driven Deviance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Dairy Science Research Alliance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Got Milk? Uncovering the Flammable Link: A Study on Milk Consumption and Arson in Oklahoma with an abstract of In recent years, the consumption of milk has been under scrutiny not only for its effects on human health but also for its potential correlation with criminal activities. This study investigates the peculiar relationship between milk consumption and arson incidents in the state of Oklahoma. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for milk consumption and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services for arson incidents from 1990 to 2021, we applied statistical analysis to unveil the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9352275 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between milk consumption and arson. This curious correlation prompts further exploration into the potential psychological and sociological influences of milk on arson tendencies, as well as the impact of dairy products on fire-related activities. The implications of this study extend beyond the dairy industry, igniting a fresh perspective on the interplay between dietary habits and criminal behavior.

ChatGPT:

milk consumption, arson incidents, Oklahoma, correlation, statistical analysis, United States Department of Agriculture, USDA data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, p-value, psychological influences, sociological influences, dairy products, fire-related activities, dietary habits, criminal behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Milk consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Fluid beverage milk in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Milk consumption

Arson in Oklahoma
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Oklahoma
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Oklahoma

Correlation r = 0.9352275 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8746505 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Oklahoma) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Milk consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.6E-15. 0.0000000000000045578173298839
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 4.6E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 219,403,264,243,035 random variables You don't actually need 219 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Milk consumption (Pounds per person)220218215210208205205201198197196192191188185185185183181181177173169164158155153149145141141134
Arson in Oklahoma (Arson rate)51.251.743.344.846.146.551.740.138.939.437.232.533.634.733.134.2343034.624.727.526.725.221.620.719.219.918.719.919.522.721.2




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([220,218,215,210,208,205,205,201,198,197,196,192,191,188,185,185,185,183,181,181,177,173,169,164,158,155,153,149,145,141,141,134,])
array_2 = np.array([51.2,51.7,43.3,44.8,46.1,46.5,51.7,40.1,38.9,39.4,37.2,32.5,33.6,34.7,33.1,34.2,34,30,34.6,24.7,27.5,26.7,25.2,21.6,20.7,19.2,19.9,18.7,19.9,19.5,22.7,21.2,])
array_1_name = "Milk consumption"
array_2_name = "Arson in Oklahoma"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1316 · Black Variable ID: 554 · Red Variable ID: 20065
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0