Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more and more Ohio corn became genetically modified, a super secret underground network of organic food aficionados, known as the "Corn Connoisseurs," realized that they needed to ramp up their organic food consumption to counteract the GMO invasion. This led to a nationwide surge in demand for organic products, as these self-proclaimed organic warriors vowed to maintain the balance in the food universe. It's the untold story of how a corny conspiracy inadvertently sparked a boom in organic food sales across the country.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] Generate an image featuring two contrasting scenes: In Scene 1, a bustling farmer's market in Ohio is depicted, with a large pile of genetically modified corn ears on display. The signs nearby indicate the rise in sales volumes, while skeptical shoppers are seen walking past the pile. They are opting for organic produce at the neighboring stalls, and their skeptical looks are clearly visible. In Scene 2, an organic farm in Ohio is portrayed, with a field of tall, golden cornstalks swaying gently in the breeze. A farmer is proudly displaying the organic corn, and cheerful customers are eagerly purchasing ears of corn, visibly expressing their preference for organic options over genetically modified ones. The prompt should focus on accurately representing the contrasting scenes and the emotions of the shoppers and customers. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Genetically modified corn in Ohio is causing a stir in the organic world, as sales volumes soar. It seems that the GMO corn's increasing presence is spooking consumers, leading them to opt for organic alternatives. It's like a-maize-ing how one crop's genetic modification can cause such a kernel of truth to pop. It's clear that this corn-y correlation is no mere coincidence!. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie A Discovery magazine cover image 3D Pixar Style An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Genetically modified corn in Ohio is causing a stir in the organic world, as sales volumes soar. It seems that the GMO corn's increasing presence is spooking consumers, leading them to opt for organic alternatives. It's like a-maize-ing how one crop's genetic modification can cause such a kernel of truth to pop. It's clear that this corn-y correlation is no mere coincidence!
ChatGPT: Imagine two contrasting scenes: Scene 1: At a bustling farmer's market in Ohio, a large pile of genetically modified corn ears is on display, with signs indicating the rise in sales volumes. Nearby, shoppers are seen walking past the pile with skeptical looks on their faces, opting instead for organic produce at the neighboring stalls. Scene 2: In an organic farm in Ohio, a field of tall, golden cornstalks sways gently in the breeze. A farmer is shown proudly displaying the organic corn, while cheerful customers eagerly purchase ears of corn, visibly expressing their preference for organic options over genetically modified ones.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine two contrasting scenes: Scene 1: At a bustling farmer's market in Ohio, a large pile of genetically modified corn ears is on display, with signs indicating the rise in sales volumes. Nearby, shoppers are seen walking past the pile with skeptical looks on their faces, opting instead for organic produce at the neighboring stalls. Scene 2: In an organic farm in Ohio, a field of tall, golden cornstalks sways gently in the breeze. A farmer is shown proudly displaying the organic corn, while cheerful customers eagerly purchase ears of corn, visibly expressing their preference for organic options over genetically modified ones. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] Generate an image featuring two contrasting scenes: In Scene 1, a bustling farmer's market in Ohio is depicted, with a large pile of genetically modified corn ears on display. The signs nearby indicate the rise in sales volumes, while skeptical shoppers are seen walking past the pile. They are opting for organic produce at the neighboring stalls, and their skeptical looks are clearly visible. In Scene 2, an organic farm in Ohio is portrayed, with a field of tall, golden cornstalks swaying gently in the breeze. A farmer is proudly displaying the organic corn, and cheerful customers are eagerly purchasing ears of corn, visibly expressing their preference for organic options over genetically modified ones. The prompt should focus on accurately representing the contrasting scenes and the emotions of the shoppers and customers.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio caused Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States to increase. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States Journal of Agricultural Economics and Sustainability Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2012.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate surrounding the use of GMOs in agriculture has been a-maize-ing, to say the least, with proponents touting increased crop yields and pest resistance, and naysayers expressing concerns about environmental impact and potential health risks. In this paper, we sprinkle some statistical seasoning on this debate by exploring the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States.
Using data from the USDA and Statista, our research team conducted a spirited investigation into this corny topic. Our findings revealed a corn-siderably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2012, suggesting a kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO usage and organic food sales.
So, what did we cob-clude from our findings? It appears that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also popped like kernels in the microwave! Our results point to a corn-nection between the two variables, shedding light on the market dynamics between GMO and organic products.
In summary, our research provides food for thought on the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, serving as a springboard for further kernel investigations in this field.
And as a final corny addition, remember, when it comes to research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate surrounding the use of GMOs in agriculture has been a-maize-ing, to say the least, with proponents touting increased crop yields and pest resistance, and naysayers expressing concerns about environmental impact and potential health risks. In this paper, we sprinkle some statistical seasoning on this debate by exploring the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States.
Using data from the USDA and Statista, our research team conducted a spirited investigation into this corny topic. Our findings revealed a corn-siderably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2012, suggesting a kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO usage and organic food sales.
So, what did we cob-clude from our findings? It appears that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also popped like kernels in the microwave! Our results point to a corn-nection between the two variables, shedding light on the market dynamics between GMO and organic products.
In summary, our research provides food for thought on the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, serving as a springboard for further kernel investigations in this field.
And as a final corny addition, remember, when it comes to research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
GMOs have made quite a splash in the agricultural world, with opinions like seeds, sown far and wide. While some folks are all ears when it comes to the potential gains in crop yields and pest resistance, others have their corns popped about environmental impact and health risks. It's like the ultimate food fight, but with statistics instead of mashed potatoes!
Amidst this cornundrum, our research dives right into the maize of it all, as we explore how the use of GMO corn in Ohio may be popping the organic food sales in the United States. It's a kernel of truth that we're aiming to unveil – or should I say, "undethrash"?
Using a-maize-ing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a kernel investigation into the correlation between GMO corn production and organic food sales. Our findings indicate that there's more than just husk and husk between these variables. In fact, the correlation coefficient may just be the corn stone of a compelling argument.
So, what do these findings cob-clude? It seems that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also saw quite the pop! It's like music to the ears of corn farmers and organic enthusiasts alike – a harmony between the conventional and the au naturel!
In summary, our research has husked some valuable insights into the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, providing a bounty of food for thought. So grab your kernels and let's dive into this corn-undrum, where there's no shelling out on the puns! And remember, in the world of research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate surrounding the use of GMOs in agriculture has been a-maize-ing, to say the least, with proponents touting increased crop yields and pest resistance, and naysayers expressing concerns about environmental impact and potential health risks. In this paper, we sprinkle some statistical seasoning on this debate by exploring the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States.
Using data from the USDA and Statista, our research team conducted a spirited investigation into this corny topic. Our findings revealed a corn-siderably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2012, suggesting a kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO usage and organic food sales.
So, what did we cob-clude from our findings? It appears that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also popped like kernels in the microwave! Our results point to a corn-nection between the two variables, shedding light on the market dynamics between GMO and organic products.
In summary, our research provides food for thought on the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, serving as a springboard for further kernel investigations in this field.
And as a final corny addition, remember, when it comes to research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
GMOs have made quite a splash in the agricultural world, with opinions like seeds, sown far and wide. While some folks are all ears when it comes to the potential gains in crop yields and pest resistance, others have their corns popped about environmental impact and health risks. It's like the ultimate food fight, but with statistics instead of mashed potatoes!
Amidst this cornundrum, our research dives right into the maize of it all, as we explore how the use of GMO corn in Ohio may be popping the organic food sales in the United States. It's a kernel of truth that we're aiming to unveil – or should I say, "undethrash"?
Using a-maize-ing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a kernel investigation into the correlation between GMO corn production and organic food sales. Our findings indicate that there's more than just husk and husk between these variables. In fact, the correlation coefficient may just be the corn stone of a compelling argument.
So, what do these findings cob-clude? It seems that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also saw quite the pop! It's like music to the ears of corn farmers and organic enthusiasts alike – a harmony between the conventional and the au naturel!
In summary, our research has husked some valuable insights into the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, providing a bounty of food for thought. So grab your kernels and let's dive into this corn-undrum, where there's no shelling out on the puns! And remember, in the world of research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The a-maize-ing debate surrounding the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has captivated the attention of researchers and layfolk alike. Smith and Doe (2010) outline the potential benefits of GMOs, such as increased crop yields and enhanced pest resistance, while Jones and Smith (2012) express concerns about the environmental impact and potential health risks associated with their usage. It's a real earful of discourse!
Now, let's sink our teeth into some literary sustenance that's as nutritious as a cob of corn. In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, the author delves into the intricacies of modern food systems including the use of GMOs, while "Food, Inc." by Peter Pringle evaluates the impacts of GMOs on food production. These sources provide kernels of knowledge that frame our understanding of this corny topic.
On the fiction front, works such as "The Corn Whisperer" by Patricia Miller and "Fields of Gold" by John Grisham, make us wonder if there's more than meets the eye in the world of agriculture and genetically modified corn. It's like a-maize-ing how fiction can sometimes mirror reality!
And who can forget the insightful social media posts that have graced our news feeds? A tweet from @OrganicObsessed reads, "GMO corn may be popping in Ohio, but organic sales are on the rise nationwide! #CornToBeWild #OrganicLiving", while a Facebook status from FarmFreshEats exclaims, "GMOs in corn? More like 'Gee Whiz, More Organic Please!' #SayNoToGMO #FarmToTable". These social media nuggets offer a kernel of public sentiment that can't go unpop-ped.
So, while our exploration into the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States may seem a bit corny, the findings pop with significance. It's like a-maize-ing how research can both enlighten and entertain – a true cornucopia of knowledge! Keep your husks peeled and your jokes popping, for there's always room for a-maize-ment in the world of academia!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2012
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate surrounding the use of GMOs in agriculture has been a-maize-ing, to say the least, with proponents touting increased crop yields and pest resistance, and naysayers expressing concerns about environmental impact and potential health risks. In this paper, we sprinkle some statistical seasoning on this debate by exploring the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States.
Using data from the USDA and Statista, our research team conducted a spirited investigation into this corny topic. Our findings revealed a corn-siderably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2012, suggesting a kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO usage and organic food sales.
So, what did we cob-clude from our findings? It appears that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also popped like kernels in the microwave! Our results point to a corn-nection between the two variables, shedding light on the market dynamics between GMO and organic products.
In summary, our research provides food for thought on the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, serving as a springboard for further kernel investigations in this field.
And as a final corny addition, remember, when it comes to research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
GMOs have made quite a splash in the agricultural world, with opinions like seeds, sown far and wide. While some folks are all ears when it comes to the potential gains in crop yields and pest resistance, others have their corns popped about environmental impact and health risks. It's like the ultimate food fight, but with statistics instead of mashed potatoes!
Amidst this cornundrum, our research dives right into the maize of it all, as we explore how the use of GMO corn in Ohio may be popping the organic food sales in the United States. It's a kernel of truth that we're aiming to unveil – or should I say, "undethrash"?
Using a-maize-ing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a kernel investigation into the correlation between GMO corn production and organic food sales. Our findings indicate that there's more than just husk and husk between these variables. In fact, the correlation coefficient may just be the corn stone of a compelling argument.
So, what do these findings cob-clude? It seems that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also saw quite the pop! It's like music to the ears of corn farmers and organic enthusiasts alike – a harmony between the conventional and the au naturel!
In summary, our research has husked some valuable insights into the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, providing a bounty of food for thought. So grab your kernels and let's dive into this corn-undrum, where there's no shelling out on the puns! And remember, in the world of research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To begin our a-maize-ing adventure into the world of GMO corn and organic food sales, we first gathered data on GMO corn production in Ohio from the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Our dedicated research team combed through the digital fields of the internet, carefully husking and shucking through databases and reports, like a-tractor-ble to the call of statistical inquiry.
We then performed a stalk-tistical analysis, examining the annual production of GMO corn in Ohio from 2000 to 2012. Our method involved a complex process of counting cornstalks in satellite images, converting those counts into estimates of corn production, and then cross-referencing those estimates with actual agricultural data obtained from local farmers. We call this technique the "corn-stellation method" – because it's not easy to figure out, just like navigating the obscure constellations in the night sky!
Simultaneously, we sourced data on organic food sales volume in the United States from Statista, plowing through the digital aisles of economic reports and market analyses. Our approach to this data entailed tracing the sales figures back to their roots, discerning patterns and trends like a savvy gardener tending to the sprouts of statistical significance.
We then performed a statistical analysis using a variety of crop circle... I mean, techniques – including regression models and time series analyses – to determine the relationship between GMO corn production in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States. Like crop circles carved in a field, our statistical models allowed us to mow down the noise and harvest the kernels of truth in the data.
Furthermore, we conducted a "stalkholder analysis" to identify key entities within the corn and organic food industries and assess their influence on the observed trends. This analysis involved scrutinizing the financial reports and market strategies of major agribusinesses and organic food retailers, as well as engagements with stakeholders through interviews and surveys. We wanted to harvest a deeper understanding of the husk-tle and bussel in the markets, uncovering the secrets hidden beneath the surface of the cornfield.
Additionally, we employed a "cobweb diagram" to visualize the intricate web of relationships between different factors affecting both GMO corn production and organic food sales. This diagram, akin to a spider's artwork, allowed us to map out the interconnectedness of variables and discern how changes in one part of the web could ripple through the entire system. It was like becoming arachnologists of the agricultural realm, spinning a web of insight into the complex interactions at play.
To address potential confounding factors, we also conducted sensitivity analyses to cornfirm the robustness of our findings, like ensuring the stalks of our results stood firm against the gusts of statistical scrutiny. Because when it comes to research, it's essential to weed out the irrelevant variables and fertilize the ones that truly matter.
In summary, our convoluted, yet cornpletely comprehensive methodology allowed us to gain a thorough understanding of the interconnected world of GMO corn production in Ohio and organic food sales in the United States. Through our stalk-tistical analyses, stakeholder engagements, and web of relationships, we unearthed the a-maize-ing story behind the corn-nection between these variables, ready to be harvested for the benefit of future research and industry growth. And remember, in the world of research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain – because that's where the most exciting discoveries are husked!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .
For the time period 2000 to 2012, you found a correlation 0.9219864, r-squared of 0.8500590, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate surrounding the use of GMOs in agriculture has been a-maize-ing, to say the least, with proponents touting increased crop yields and pest resistance, and naysayers expressing concerns about environmental impact and potential health risks. In this paper, we sprinkle some statistical seasoning on this debate by exploring the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States.
Using data from the USDA and Statista, our research team conducted a spirited investigation into this corny topic. Our findings revealed a corn-siderably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2012, suggesting a kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO usage and organic food sales.
So, what did we cob-clude from our findings? It appears that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also popped like kernels in the microwave! Our results point to a corn-nection between the two variables, shedding light on the market dynamics between GMO and organic products.
In summary, our research provides food for thought on the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, serving as a springboard for further kernel investigations in this field.
And as a final corny addition, remember, when it comes to research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
GMOs have made quite a splash in the agricultural world, with opinions like seeds, sown far and wide. While some folks are all ears when it comes to the potential gains in crop yields and pest resistance, others have their corns popped about environmental impact and health risks. It's like the ultimate food fight, but with statistics instead of mashed potatoes!
Amidst this cornundrum, our research dives right into the maize of it all, as we explore how the use of GMO corn in Ohio may be popping the organic food sales in the United States. It's a kernel of truth that we're aiming to unveil – or should I say, "undethrash"?
Using a-maize-ing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a kernel investigation into the correlation between GMO corn production and organic food sales. Our findings indicate that there's more than just husk and husk between these variables. In fact, the correlation coefficient may just be the corn stone of a compelling argument.
So, what do these findings cob-clude? It seems that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also saw quite the pop! It's like music to the ears of corn farmers and organic enthusiasts alike – a harmony between the conventional and the au naturel!
In summary, our research has husked some valuable insights into the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, providing a bounty of food for thought. So grab your kernels and let's dive into this corn-undrum, where there's no shelling out on the puns! And remember, in the world of research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States for the time period of 2000 to 2012. The obtained correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, the GMO corn in Ohio and organic food sales seem to be as tightly intertwined as two ears on the same cob! It's a-maize-ing how these seemingly unrelated entities can be so 'ear-resistibly' linked.
Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8500590 indicates that a substantial 85% of the variability in organic food sales volume can be explained by the changes in GMO corn production in Ohio. That's a lot of 'corncentrated' influence! It's safe to say that the impact of GMO corn on organic food sales is not mere husk – it's a substantial kernel of the story.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the reliability of the observed correlation, reinforcing the notion that this connection between GMO use and organic food sales is not just a fluke. It's as real as the cornstalks in a field! This strong statistical significance supports the idea that the relationship between GMO corn production and organic food sales volume is more than just a kernel of truth – it's a full-fledged corn-dition!
"Fig. 1" visually encapsulates the findings of our analysis, presenting a scatterplot demonstrating the robust correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States over the span of 2000 to 2012. Just as kernels of corn scatter in a field, the data points in the plot exhibit a clear and 'cornsistent' pattern of association. The figure provides a visual testament to the striking connection we observed, making it clear that when it comes to GMO corn and organic food sales, there's no shucking around!
In conclusion, our research catapults the conversation about GMO use and organic food sales into the forefront with compelling evidence of their intertwined nature. These results corn-firm the material impact of GMO corn production in Ohio on the flourishing organic food market in the United States. So, if you ever doubted the significance of GMOs in the grand scheme of agriculture, just remember: where there's a kernel, there's a way!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate surrounding the use of GMOs in agriculture has been a-maize-ing, to say the least, with proponents touting increased crop yields and pest resistance, and naysayers expressing concerns about environmental impact and potential health risks. In this paper, we sprinkle some statistical seasoning on this debate by exploring the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States.
Using data from the USDA and Statista, our research team conducted a spirited investigation into this corny topic. Our findings revealed a corn-siderably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2012, suggesting a kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO usage and organic food sales.
So, what did we cob-clude from our findings? It appears that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also popped like kernels in the microwave! Our results point to a corn-nection between the two variables, shedding light on the market dynamics between GMO and organic products.
In summary, our research provides food for thought on the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, serving as a springboard for further kernel investigations in this field.
And as a final corny addition, remember, when it comes to research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The a-maize-ing debate surrounding the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has captivated the attention of researchers and layfolk alike. Smith and Doe (2010) outline the potential benefits of GMOs, such as increased crop yields and enhanced pest resistance, while Jones and Smith (2012) express concerns about the environmental impact and potential health risks associated with their usage. It's a real earful of discourse!
Now, let's sink our teeth into some literary sustenance that's as nutritious as a cob of corn. In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, the author delves into the intricacies of modern food systems including the use of GMOs, while "Food, Inc." by Peter Pringle evaluates the impacts of GMOs on food production. These sources provide kernels of knowledge that frame our understanding of this corny topic.
On the fiction front, works such as "The Corn Whisperer" by Patricia Miller and "Fields of Gold" by John Grisham, make us wonder if there's more than meets the eye in the world of agriculture and genetically modified corn. It's like a-maize-ing how fiction can sometimes mirror reality!
And who can forget the insightful social media posts that have graced our news feeds? A tweet from @OrganicObsessed reads, "GMO corn may be popping in Ohio, but organic sales are on the rise nationwide! #CornToBeWild #OrganicLiving", while a Facebook status from FarmFreshEats exclaims, "GMOs in corn? More like 'Gee Whiz, More Organic Please!' #SayNoToGMO #FarmToTable". These social media nuggets offer a kernel of public sentiment that can't go unpop-ped.
So, while our exploration into the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States may seem a bit corny, the findings pop with significance. It's like a-maize-ing how research can both enlighten and entertain – a true cornucopia of knowledge! Keep your husks peeled and your jokes popping, for there's always room for a-maize-ment in the world of academia!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States for the time period of 2000 to 2012. The obtained correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, the GMO corn in Ohio and organic food sales seem to be as tightly intertwined as two ears on the same cob! It's a-maize-ing how these seemingly unrelated entities can be so 'ear-resistibly' linked.
Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8500590 indicates that a substantial 85% of the variability in organic food sales volume can be explained by the changes in GMO corn production in Ohio. That's a lot of 'corncentrated' influence! It's safe to say that the impact of GMO corn on organic food sales is not mere husk – it's a substantial kernel of the story.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the reliability of the observed correlation, reinforcing the notion that this connection between GMO use and organic food sales is not just a fluke. It's as real as the cornstalks in a field! This strong statistical significance supports the idea that the relationship between GMO corn production and organic food sales volume is more than just a kernel of truth – it's a full-fledged corn-dition!
"Fig. 1" visually encapsulates the findings of our analysis, presenting a scatterplot demonstrating the robust correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States over the span of 2000 to 2012. Just as kernels of corn scatter in a field, the data points in the plot exhibit a clear and 'cornsistent' pattern of association. The figure provides a visual testament to the striking connection we observed, making it clear that when it comes to GMO corn and organic food sales, there's no shucking around!
In conclusion, our research catapults the conversation about GMO use and organic food sales into the forefront with compelling evidence of their intertwined nature. These results corn-firm the material impact of GMO corn production in Ohio on the flourishing organic food market in the United States. So, if you ever doubted the significance of GMOs in the grand scheme of agriculture, just remember: where there's a kernel, there's a way!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings corroborate and build upon the prior research regarding the relationship between GMO use in corn and organic food sales. Just like a farmer's plow unhurriedly upturning the soil, our analysis unearthed compelling evidence that supports the notion of a tight-knit corn-nection between these variables. Smith and Doe's (2010) discussion on the enhanced pest resistance of GMOs may indirectly contribute to the proliferation of organic food sales, as consumers seek alternatives to pesticide-laden produce. Similarly, Jones and Smith's (2012) concerns about potential health risks may parallel the upward trend in organic food sales, reflecting heightened consumer awareness and preferences for healthier, non-GMO options.
It's like they say, "when life gives you corn, make organic cornbread!" The significant correlation coefficient and r-squared value in our analysis reflect a strong relationship between GMO corn production in Ohio and organic food sales volume, akin to the inseparable bond between popcorn and movie nights. This lends support to the notion that the dynamics within the corn market – both GMO and organic – are as intertwined as kernels on a cob.
In a similar vein, our statistical analysis not only affirms the corn-nection between GMO usage and organic food sales but also underscores the substantial influence of GMO corn production on the variability in organic food sales volume. This aligns with the nuanced discourse on GMOs in "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, emphasizing the profound impact of corn in shaping modern food systems.
Just like a kernel's transformation into scrumptious popcorn, the observed association does not just appear out of thin air. The robustness of our results, underscored by the impressive p-value, dispels any misconceptions that this correlation could be nothing more than a kernel of statistical noise. Our findings suggest that the relationship between GMO corn in Ohio and organic food sales in the U.S. is as real as the corn you'd find in your local grocery store.
This research journey, with all its corny jokes and statistical analyses, has yielded a kernel of insight into the delicate dance between GMO use in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States. As our exploration unfolds, it's evident that the corn-nection between these variables is not just a-maize-ingly significant but also ripe for further investigations in the field. After all, the study of GMOs and organic food is indeed a-maize-ing, and there's always room for some pop-corned humor in academia!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States"
[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate surrounding the use of GMOs in agriculture has been a-maize-ing, to say the least, with proponents touting increased crop yields and pest resistance, and naysayers expressing concerns about environmental impact and potential health risks. In this paper, we sprinkle some statistical seasoning on this debate by exploring the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States.
Using data from the USDA and Statista, our research team conducted a spirited investigation into this corny topic. Our findings revealed a corn-siderably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2012, suggesting a kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO usage and organic food sales.
So, what did we cob-clude from our findings? It appears that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also popped like kernels in the microwave! Our results point to a corn-nection between the two variables, shedding light on the market dynamics between GMO and organic products.
In summary, our research provides food for thought on the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, serving as a springboard for further kernel investigations in this field.
And as a final corny addition, remember, when it comes to research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
GMOs have made quite a splash in the agricultural world, with opinions like seeds, sown far and wide. While some folks are all ears when it comes to the potential gains in crop yields and pest resistance, others have their corns popped about environmental impact and health risks. It's like the ultimate food fight, but with statistics instead of mashed potatoes!
Amidst this cornundrum, our research dives right into the maize of it all, as we explore how the use of GMO corn in Ohio may be popping the organic food sales in the United States. It's a kernel of truth that we're aiming to unveil – or should I say, "undethrash"?
Using a-maize-ing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a kernel investigation into the correlation between GMO corn production and organic food sales. Our findings indicate that there's more than just husk and husk between these variables. In fact, the correlation coefficient may just be the corn stone of a compelling argument.
So, what do these findings cob-clude? It seems that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also saw quite the pop! It's like music to the ears of corn farmers and organic enthusiasts alike – a harmony between the conventional and the au naturel!
In summary, our research has husked some valuable insights into the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, providing a bounty of food for thought. So grab your kernels and let's dive into this corn-undrum, where there's no shelling out on the puns! And remember, in the world of research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States for the time period of 2000 to 2012. The obtained correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, the GMO corn in Ohio and organic food sales seem to be as tightly intertwined as two ears on the same cob! It's a-maize-ing how these seemingly unrelated entities can be so 'ear-resistibly' linked.
Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8500590 indicates that a substantial 85% of the variability in organic food sales volume can be explained by the changes in GMO corn production in Ohio. That's a lot of 'corncentrated' influence! It's safe to say that the impact of GMO corn on organic food sales is not mere husk – it's a substantial kernel of the story.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the reliability of the observed correlation, reinforcing the notion that this connection between GMO use and organic food sales is not just a fluke. It's as real as the cornstalks in a field! This strong statistical significance supports the idea that the relationship between GMO corn production and organic food sales volume is more than just a kernel of truth – it's a full-fledged corn-dition!
"Fig. 1" visually encapsulates the findings of our analysis, presenting a scatterplot demonstrating the robust correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States over the span of 2000 to 2012. Just as kernels of corn scatter in a field, the data points in the plot exhibit a clear and 'cornsistent' pattern of association. The figure provides a visual testament to the striking connection we observed, making it clear that when it comes to GMO corn and organic food sales, there's no shucking around!
In conclusion, our research catapults the conversation about GMO use and organic food sales into the forefront with compelling evidence of their intertwined nature. These results corn-firm the material impact of GMO corn production in Ohio on the flourishing organic food market in the United States. So, if you ever doubted the significance of GMOs in the grand scheme of agriculture, just remember: where there's a kernel, there's a way!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has peered into the cornfield of GMO use in Ohio and harvested a-maize-ing insights into its corn-nection with organic food sales volume in the United States. The significant correlation coefficient and p-value of our findings provide solid evidence that this corn-nection is more than just "ear"-relevant – it's statistically compelling.
The strong relationship we observed between the two variables is as undeniable as a cob of corn at a summer barbecue. It prompts us to re-corn-cile our perspectives on the influence of GMOs in shaping the organic food market. It seems that when it comes to GMOs and organic food sales, we can't simply "corn-tain" the impact!
Our research not only sheds light on the corn-plexities of agricultural production and consumer preferences but also serves as a kernel for further exploration in this "stalk"-ing area of study. It plants the seeds for future research to flourish and cultivate a deeper understanding of the interplay between GMOs and organic food sales.
In the grand scheme of research, our findings may just be the ear-mark of a paradigm shift in how we view GMOs and their corn-tribution to the agricultural landscape. It's like discovering the "corn stone" in a field of conventional wisdom – a kernel of truth that can't be dismissed.
So, as we butter our research findings with these puns, we assert with full confidence that no more research is needed in this area. We have corn-pleted the cob, and it's time to let these findings pop and sizzle in the scholarly landscape. After all, when it comes to corn-clusions, sometimes you just have to husk it and not look back!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Agricultural Economics and Sustainability
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Agri-Science and Sustainable Food Systems
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States with an abstract of The debate surrounding the use of GMOs in agriculture has been a-maize-ing, to say the least, with proponents touting increased crop yields and pest resistance, and naysayers expressing concerns about environmental impact and potential health risks. In this paper, we sprinkle some statistical seasoning on this debate by exploring the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and organic food sales volume in the United States.
Using data from the USDA and Statista, our research team conducted a spirited investigation into this corny topic. Our findings revealed a corn-siderably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9219864 and p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2012, suggesting a kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO usage and organic food sales.
So, what did we cob-clude from our findings? It appears that as GMO corn production in Ohio grew, organic food sales in the United States also popped like kernels in the microwave! Our results point to a corn-nection between the two variables, shedding light on the market dynamics between GMO and organic products.
In summary, our research provides food for thought on the interplay between GMO corn production and organic food sales, serving as a springboard for further kernel investigations in this field.
And as a final corny addition, remember, when it comes to research, sometimes you just have to go against the grain!
ChatGPT:
GMO, Ohio, organic food sales, United States, agriculture, crop yields, pest resistance, environmental impact, health risks, USDA, Statista, correlation coefficient, GMO usage, corn production, market dynamics, market research
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GMO use in corn grown in OhioDetailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Ohio that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Ohio
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8500590 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Ohio) over the 13 years from 2000 through 2012.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.4E-6. 0.0000073874068278430080000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00074% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 135,365 random variables You don't actually need 135 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.75, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | |
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio (GMO corn %) | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 22 | 13 | 20 |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States (Sales in US Dollars) | 6100000000 | 7360000000 | 8635000000 | 10381000000 | 12002000000 | 14223000000 | 17221000000 | 20410000000 | 23607000000 | 24803000000 | 26708000000 | 29220000000 | 31320000000 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3,4,3,3,4,7,13,12,17,17,22,13,20,])
array_2 = np.array([6100000000,7360000000,8635000000,10381000000,12002000000,14223000000,17221000000,20410000000,23607000000,24803000000,26708000000,29220000000,31320000000,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Ohio"
array_2_name = "Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GMO use in corn grown in Ohio
- Line chart for only Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States
- The spurious research paper: From GMO to Yo' Money: The Corn-nection Between GMO Use in Ohio and Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States
Cheers to you for rating this correlation!
Correlation ID: 1298 · Black Variable ID: 734 · Red Variable ID: 492