about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,253 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and the second variable is Hollister retail store count worldwide.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO corn in Minnesota grew taller, it created a need for longer shirt sizes, prompting Hollister to expand its inventory globally to accommodate the new corn-fed demand. Talk about a growth spurt in the fashion industry!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie depicting a field in Minnesota, where tall stalks of GMO corn sway in the breeze, reaching higher than ever before. Nearby, a group of people shop at a Hollister store with shirts that are conspicuously longer to accommodate the taller corn. In the background, a bustling city hosts the grand opening of a new Hollister store as demand for longer shirts grows worldwide. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because as GMO corn in Minnesota grew taller, it created a need for longer shirts, which led to increased demand at Hollister prompting the opening of more stores worldwide to meet this new sartorial requirement.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Hyper-realistic inspired by bauhaus Woodblock painting Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because as GMO corn in Minnesota grew taller, it created a need for longer shirts, which led to increased demand at Hollister prompting the opening of more stores worldwide to meet this new sartorial requirement.
ChatGPT: In a field in Minnesota, tall stalks of GMO corn sway in the breeze, reaching higher than ever before. Nearby, a group of people shop at a Hollister store, carefully selecting longer shirts that now accommodate the taller corn. In the background, a new Hollister store opens in a bustling city, as demand for longer shirts grows worldwide.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Minnesota, tall stalks of GMO corn sway in the breeze, reaching higher than ever before. Nearby, a group of people shop at a Hollister store, carefully selecting longer shirts that now accommodate the taller corn. In the background, a new Hollister store opens in a bustling city, as demand for longer shirts grows worldwide. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie depicting a field in Minnesota, where tall stalks of GMO corn sway in the breeze, reaching higher than ever before. Nearby, a group of people shop at a Hollister store with shirts that are conspicuously longer to accommodate the taller corn. In the background, a bustling city hosts the grand opening of a new Hollister store as demand for longer shirts grows worldwide.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota caused Hollister retail store count worldwide to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores around the world. Using data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in corn production and the global presence of the popular retail brand. Through rigorous statistical methods, we have uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2000 to 2022. The results not only illuminate the corny connection between genetically modified corn and the worldwide presence of Hollister stores but also shed light on the unforeseen links between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our work not only aims to contribute to the scholarly understanding of agri-retail dynamics but also to add a kernel of humor to the often serious world of academic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores around the world. Using data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in corn production and the global presence of the popular retail brand. Through rigorous statistical methods, we have uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2000 to 2022. The results not only illuminate the corny connection between genetically modified corn and the worldwide presence of Hollister stores but also shed light on the unforeseen links between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our work not only aims to contribute to the scholarly understanding of agri-retail dynamics but also to add a kernel of humor to the often serious world of academic research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The flourishing field of agricultural and retail economics often unearths unexpected connections and patterns, and our research uncovers a particularly intriguing one between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in the state of Minnesota and the spread of Hollister retail stores across the globe. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may, at first glance, appear nothing short of cornfusing, but our analysis aims to provide clarity amidst the puzzling peculiarities in the agri-retail landscape.

As genetic engineering continues to sow seeds of controversy in the agricultural realm, we delve into the cornucopia of data to examine the ramifications of GMO adoption in corn cultivation. Simultaneously, we navigate the labyrinthine retail sector, where Hollister stores stand as emblematic outposts of youthful fashion and bronzed lifeguards. With a spirit as determined as a Midwestern farmer and as inquisitive as a global wanderer in a shopping mall, we embark on this research journey to probe the entwined destinies of genetically modified corn and retail aspirations.

Amidst the serious statistical analyses and academic gravitas, we embrace the opportunity to sprinkle a dash of whimsy into the world of scholarly investigation. After all, what could be more essential to the pursuit of knowledge than a kernel of humor? So let us tarry a while in the seemingly incongruous intersection of GMO cornfields and the glittering aisles of Hollister, and see what sprouts forth from this improbable convergence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores around the world. Using data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in corn production and the global presence of the popular retail brand. Through rigorous statistical methods, we have uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2000 to 2022. The results not only illuminate the corny connection between genetically modified corn and the worldwide presence of Hollister stores but also shed light on the unforeseen links between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our work not only aims to contribute to the scholarly understanding of agri-retail dynamics but also to add a kernel of humor to the often serious world of academic research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The flourishing field of agricultural and retail economics often unearths unexpected connections and patterns, and our research uncovers a particularly intriguing one between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in the state of Minnesota and the spread of Hollister retail stores across the globe. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may, at first glance, appear nothing short of cornfusing, but our analysis aims to provide clarity amidst the puzzling peculiarities in the agri-retail landscape.
As genetic engineering continues to sow seeds of controversy in the agricultural realm, we delve into the cornucopia of data to examine the ramifications of GMO adoption in corn cultivation. Simultaneously, we navigate the labyrinthine retail sector, where Hollister stores stand as emblematic outposts of youthful fashion and bronzed lifeguards. With a spirit as determined as a Midwestern farmer and as inquisitive as a global wanderer in a shopping mall, we embark on this research journey to probe the entwined destinies of genetically modified corn and retail aspirations.
Amidst the serious statistical analyses and academic gravitas, we embrace the opportunity to sprinkle a dash of whimsy into the world of scholarly investigation. After all, what could be more essential to the pursuit of knowledge than a kernel of humor? So let us tarry a while in the seemingly incongruous intersection of GMO cornfields and the glittering aisles of Hollister, and see what sprouts forth from this improbable convergence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores has captivated the attention of researchers and scholars alike. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive study examining the impact of GMO adoption on agricultural productivity, while Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the economic implications of retail store expansion in the global market. These serious inquiries laid the foundation for our investigation, as we sought to uncover the whimsically unexpected bond between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides valuable insights into the complexities of modern agricultural practices, shedding light on the nuanced implications of GMO usage in corn cultivation. Similarly, "The Economics of Retailing" by John Dawson offers a comprehensive analysis of retail industry trends, serving as a guide for understanding the dynamics of global retail expansion.

In the realm of fiction, "Corn Wars" by Alan Wieder explores the fictionalized world of agricultural conflicts, offering a satirical take on the contentious debates surrounding GMO usage. Meanwhile, "The Retail Chronicles" by Sarah Shopper weaves a captivating narrative of the retail industry's rise to prominence, drawing parallels to our own investigation of the global presence of Hollister stores.

Venturing into the unconventional, our research team undertook an eclectic approach to literature review, drawing unexpected inspiration from sources beyond traditional academic texts. In a peculiar twist, the back covers of shampoo bottles revealed surprisingly insightful perspectives on consumer behaviors, hinting at the interplay between personal grooming habits and retail preferences. While not a conventional scholarly source, this unorthodox approach exemplifies our commitment to unearthing unconventional connections and embracing the humorous undertones of our research pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores around the world. Using data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in corn production and the global presence of the popular retail brand. Through rigorous statistical methods, we have uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2000 to 2022. The results not only illuminate the corny connection between genetically modified corn and the worldwide presence of Hollister stores but also shed light on the unforeseen links between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our work not only aims to contribute to the scholarly understanding of agri-retail dynamics but also to add a kernel of humor to the often serious world of academic research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The flourishing field of agricultural and retail economics often unearths unexpected connections and patterns, and our research uncovers a particularly intriguing one between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in the state of Minnesota and the spread of Hollister retail stores across the globe. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may, at first glance, appear nothing short of cornfusing, but our analysis aims to provide clarity amidst the puzzling peculiarities in the agri-retail landscape.
As genetic engineering continues to sow seeds of controversy in the agricultural realm, we delve into the cornucopia of data to examine the ramifications of GMO adoption in corn cultivation. Simultaneously, we navigate the labyrinthine retail sector, where Hollister stores stand as emblematic outposts of youthful fashion and bronzed lifeguards. With a spirit as determined as a Midwestern farmer and as inquisitive as a global wanderer in a shopping mall, we embark on this research journey to probe the entwined destinies of genetically modified corn and retail aspirations.
Amidst the serious statistical analyses and academic gravitas, we embrace the opportunity to sprinkle a dash of whimsy into the world of scholarly investigation. After all, what could be more essential to the pursuit of knowledge than a kernel of humor? So let us tarry a while in the seemingly incongruous intersection of GMO cornfields and the glittering aisles of Hollister, and see what sprouts forth from this improbable convergence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection
The research team scoured the depths of the internet, navigating the digital maize of information, to procure datasets that would allow for a thorough investigation of the intersection between genetically modified corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. The main sources of data included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, where we gleaned comprehensive information about corn production and retail store counts from 2000 to 2022.

Genetic Mapping
In mapping the genetic terrain of GMO corn usage, our research team employed advanced algorithms akin to deciphering a cryptic corn maze. We assessed the prevalence of GMO adoption in Minnesota and its implications for corn production, considering factors such as yield, resilience to pests, and the corn's ability to take a-ear the changing agricultural landscape. Our explorations delved into the genetic makeup of corn at a molecular level, akin to peeling back the husk of a corn cob to reveal its hidden kernels of information.

Statistical Analysis
To unravel the association between GMO use in Minnesota-grown corn and the worldwide proliferation of Hollister retail stores, rigorous statistical methods were employed. We calculated correlation coefficients with the precision of a seasoned corn farmer diagnosing soil fertility and conducted regression analyses to glean insights into the growth patterns of both GMO corn and Hollister stores. Our statistical techniques plowed through the data fields, akin to a combine harvester harvesting the fruitful results from the fields of research.

Spatial Analysis
In elucidating the spatial dynamics of this corny connection, we utilized geographic information systems (GIS) to visually map the distribution of GMO corn cultivation in Minnesota and the spatial distribution of Hollister retail stores across the globe. This allowed for a comprehensive analysis of their interconnected presence across different geographic regions, akin to plotting points on a vast agricultural and retail cartographic canvas.

In summary, our methodology combined the precision of a geneticist with the acumen of an agricultural economist, as we sought to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interplay between GMO corn and the global reach of Hollister stores. Our methods aimed to not only uncover kernels of truth but also to infuse a sense of humor into the soil of academic research, sowing the seeds for a crop of insightful and entertaining findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9862447, r-squared of 0.9726786, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores around the world. Using data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in corn production and the global presence of the popular retail brand. Through rigorous statistical methods, we have uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2000 to 2022. The results not only illuminate the corny connection between genetically modified corn and the worldwide presence of Hollister stores but also shed light on the unforeseen links between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our work not only aims to contribute to the scholarly understanding of agri-retail dynamics but also to add a kernel of humor to the often serious world of academic research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The flourishing field of agricultural and retail economics often unearths unexpected connections and patterns, and our research uncovers a particularly intriguing one between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in the state of Minnesota and the spread of Hollister retail stores across the globe. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may, at first glance, appear nothing short of cornfusing, but our analysis aims to provide clarity amidst the puzzling peculiarities in the agri-retail landscape.
As genetic engineering continues to sow seeds of controversy in the agricultural realm, we delve into the cornucopia of data to examine the ramifications of GMO adoption in corn cultivation. Simultaneously, we navigate the labyrinthine retail sector, where Hollister stores stand as emblematic outposts of youthful fashion and bronzed lifeguards. With a spirit as determined as a Midwestern farmer and as inquisitive as a global wanderer in a shopping mall, we embark on this research journey to probe the entwined destinies of genetically modified corn and retail aspirations.
Amidst the serious statistical analyses and academic gravitas, we embrace the opportunity to sprinkle a dash of whimsy into the world of scholarly investigation. After all, what could be more essential to the pursuit of knowledge than a kernel of humor? So let us tarry a while in the seemingly incongruous intersection of GMO cornfields and the glittering aisles of Hollister, and see what sprouts forth from this improbable convergence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data collected revealed a surprisingly strong correlation between GMO usage in corn production in Minnesota and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Over the period of 2000 to 2022, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9862447, indicating a highly significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9726786, signifying that approximately 97.27% of the variability in Hollister store count can be explained by the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation. The p-value of less than 0.01 also suggests a high level of significance, affirming the robustness of our findings.

Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot presenting the clear and compelling relationship between the utilization of GMOs in corn production in Minnesota and the global presence of Hollister retail stores. The graph unmistakably illustrates the tight clustering of data points, affirming the robustness of the correlation identified in our analysis. The strength of this association underscores the surprising interplay between agricultural practices and retail expansion, demonstrating the unexpected interconnectedness within the complex web of economic phenomena.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of economics, offering a kernel of insight into the broader dynamics of interconnected industries and consumer behavior. While the exact mechanisms underlying this relationship remain to be fully elucidated, our research contributes a tantalizing tidbit to the tapestry of agri-retail dynamics and invites further exploration into the quirky interplay between GMO cornfields and the global presence of Hollister stores.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores around the world. Using data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in corn production and the global presence of the popular retail brand. Through rigorous statistical methods, we have uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2000 to 2022. The results not only illuminate the corny connection between genetically modified corn and the worldwide presence of Hollister stores but also shed light on the unforeseen links between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our work not only aims to contribute to the scholarly understanding of agri-retail dynamics but also to add a kernel of humor to the often serious world of academic research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores has captivated the attention of researchers and scholars alike. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive study examining the impact of GMO adoption on agricultural productivity, while Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the economic implications of retail store expansion in the global market. These serious inquiries laid the foundation for our investigation, as we sought to uncover the whimsically unexpected bond between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides valuable insights into the complexities of modern agricultural practices, shedding light on the nuanced implications of GMO usage in corn cultivation. Similarly, "The Economics of Retailing" by John Dawson offers a comprehensive analysis of retail industry trends, serving as a guide for understanding the dynamics of global retail expansion.
In the realm of fiction, "Corn Wars" by Alan Wieder explores the fictionalized world of agricultural conflicts, offering a satirical take on the contentious debates surrounding GMO usage. Meanwhile, "The Retail Chronicles" by Sarah Shopper weaves a captivating narrative of the retail industry's rise to prominence, drawing parallels to our own investigation of the global presence of Hollister stores.
Venturing into the unconventional, our research team undertook an eclectic approach to literature review, drawing unexpected inspiration from sources beyond traditional academic texts. In a peculiar twist, the back covers of shampoo bottles revealed surprisingly insightful perspectives on consumer behaviors, hinting at the interplay between personal grooming habits and retail preferences. While not a conventional scholarly source, this unorthodox approach exemplifies our commitment to unearthing unconventional connections and embracing the humorous undertones of our research pursuit.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected revealed a surprisingly strong correlation between GMO usage in corn production in Minnesota and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Over the period of 2000 to 2022, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9862447, indicating a highly significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9726786, signifying that approximately 97.27% of the variability in Hollister store count can be explained by the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation. The p-value of less than 0.01 also suggests a high level of significance, affirming the robustness of our findings.
Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot presenting the clear and compelling relationship between the utilization of GMOs in corn production in Minnesota and the global presence of Hollister retail stores. The graph unmistakably illustrates the tight clustering of data points, affirming the robustness of the correlation identified in our analysis. The strength of this association underscores the surprising interplay between agricultural practices and retail expansion, demonstrating the unexpected interconnectedness within the complex web of economic phenomena.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of economics, offering a kernel of insight into the broader dynamics of interconnected industries and consumer behavior. While the exact mechanisms underlying this relationship remain to be fully elucidated, our research contributes a tantalizing tidbit to the tapestry of agri-retail dynamics and invites further exploration into the quirky interplay between GMO cornfields and the global presence of Hollister stores.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study offer a whimsically unexpected revelation, unraveling the intriguing corny connection between GMO usage in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores globally. These results not only align with previous research by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015) but also add a kernel of insight into the unanticipated relationship between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our statistical analysis, producing a correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01, not only buttresses the work of our esteemed predecessors but also places our results in the spotlight.

The pun is certainly intended when we say that our findings have truly "cornvinced" us of the entwined nature of genetically modified corn and the presence of Hollister stores. The robustness of our correlation coefficient, which explains approximately 97.27% of the variability in Hollister store count, leaves little room for doubt about the strength of this peculiar association. Indeed, it seems that the relationship between GMO usage in cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister stores is not just a "cornspiracy theory" but a tangible reality, adding a pinch of novelty to the often serious world of academic inquiry.

We must harken back to the unorthodox sources of inspiration in our literature review, particularly the insights gleaned from the back covers of shampoo bottles. While it may be perceived as eccentric, this unconventional approach has led to a kernel of truth that resonates with the serious pursuit of scholarly inquiry. Our findings, although seemingly corn-puzzling at first, reflect the interconnectedness of disparate industries and consumer behaviors, evoking a potent blend of curiosity and amusement in the academic landscape.

Figure 1, displaying the scatterplot with tightly clustered data points, serves as a striking visual representation of our robust correlation. The seemingly absurd connection between corn cultivation and the global retail market has been brought to light, lacing our scholarly endeavors with a dash of unexpected humor and a generous sprinkling of quirky intrigue. While the exact mechanisms governing this relationship remain shrouded in enigma, our research offers a promising trajectory for unraveling the delightful enigma of GMOs and retail expansion.

In this context, our work not only aligns with prior research but also presents a "cornucopia" of possibilities for further exploration. The interplay between agricultural practices and retail dynamics, while seemingly surreal, invites scholarly examination and tickles the intellectual taste buds with its unconventional charm. As we tread the cornfield of research, it is our hope that our findings stimulate a lighthearted yet thought-provoking dialogue within the scholarly community, planting the seeds for future investigations into the unanticipated links between corn cultivation and global retail presence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores around the world. Using data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in corn production and the global presence of the popular retail brand. Through rigorous statistical methods, we have uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2000 to 2022. The results not only illuminate the corny connection between genetically modified corn and the worldwide presence of Hollister stores but also shed light on the unforeseen links between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our work not only aims to contribute to the scholarly understanding of agri-retail dynamics but also to add a kernel of humor to the often serious world of academic research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The flourishing field of agricultural and retail economics often unearths unexpected connections and patterns, and our research uncovers a particularly intriguing one between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in the state of Minnesota and the spread of Hollister retail stores across the globe. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may, at first glance, appear nothing short of cornfusing, but our analysis aims to provide clarity amidst the puzzling peculiarities in the agri-retail landscape.
As genetic engineering continues to sow seeds of controversy in the agricultural realm, we delve into the cornucopia of data to examine the ramifications of GMO adoption in corn cultivation. Simultaneously, we navigate the labyrinthine retail sector, where Hollister stores stand as emblematic outposts of youthful fashion and bronzed lifeguards. With a spirit as determined as a Midwestern farmer and as inquisitive as a global wanderer in a shopping mall, we embark on this research journey to probe the entwined destinies of genetically modified corn and retail aspirations.
Amidst the serious statistical analyses and academic gravitas, we embrace the opportunity to sprinkle a dash of whimsy into the world of scholarly investigation. After all, what could be more essential to the pursuit of knowledge than a kernel of humor? So let us tarry a while in the seemingly incongruous intersection of GMO cornfields and the glittering aisles of Hollister, and see what sprouts forth from this improbable convergence.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected revealed a surprisingly strong correlation between GMO usage in corn production in Minnesota and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Over the period of 2000 to 2022, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9862447, indicating a highly significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9726786, signifying that approximately 97.27% of the variability in Hollister store count can be explained by the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation. The p-value of less than 0.01 also suggests a high level of significance, affirming the robustness of our findings.
Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot presenting the clear and compelling relationship between the utilization of GMOs in corn production in Minnesota and the global presence of Hollister retail stores. The graph unmistakably illustrates the tight clustering of data points, affirming the robustness of the correlation identified in our analysis. The strength of this association underscores the surprising interplay between agricultural practices and retail expansion, demonstrating the unexpected interconnectedness within the complex web of economic phenomena.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of economics, offering a kernel of insight into the broader dynamics of interconnected industries and consumer behavior. While the exact mechanisms underlying this relationship remain to be fully elucidated, our research contributes a tantalizing tidbit to the tapestry of agri-retail dynamics and invites further exploration into the quirky interplay between GMO cornfields and the global presence of Hollister stores.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the seemingly improbable relationship between GMO usage in Minnesota corn production and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores has yielded compelling and cornvincing results. The remarkably high correlation coefficient and significance level underscore the unexpected interconnectedness between these disparate domains, shedding light on the potential influence of agricultural practices on retail expansion. Our findings not only unveil a cornucopia of insights into the agri-retail landscape but also add a pop of unexpected flavor to the typically serious discourse of scholarly research.

While our research has sown the seeds of understanding in this peculiar agri-retail nexus, it is clear that further cultivation of this field is warranted. As our study provides a corny yet intriguing lens through which to view the interplay of economic phenomena, we believe that the time has come to reap the harvest of knowledge and let this research cob to rest. After all, in the immortal words of Vincent van Gogh, "I am seeking, I am striving, I am considering. And, with all this, I'm still stumped by the connection between GMO corn and Hollister stores. But I'm confident our research has popped that mystery wide open!"

In sum, with our findings in hand, we assert with cornviction that no more research is needed in this area. For now, let us bid adieu to the curious case of GMO corn and Hollister stores, and may the kernels of truth we have unearthed continue to inspire curiosity and laughter in scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Global Retail Trends Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kernels of Truth: Unveiling the Corny Connection between GMO Usage in Minnesota and Hollister Store Count Globally with an abstract of In this paper, we present our findings on the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Minnesota and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores around the world. Using data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO usage in corn production and the global presence of the popular retail brand. Through rigorous statistical methods, we have uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9862447 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2000 to 2022. The results not only illuminate the corny connection between genetically modified corn and the worldwide presence of Hollister stores but also shed light on the unforeseen links between agricultural practices and retail expansion. Our work not only aims to contribute to the scholarly understanding of agri-retail dynamics but also to add a kernel of humor to the often serious world of academic research.

ChatGPT:

GMO, GMO usage, genetically modified organisms, corn cultivation, Minnesota, Hollister, retail stores, global presence, United States Department of Agriculture, USDA, Statista, correlation coefficient, significance level, agricultural practices, retail expansion, agri-retail dynamics, academic research, humor

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Minnesota that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota

Hollister retail store count worldwide
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Hollister retail store count worldwide

Correlation r = 0.9862447 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9726786 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hollister retail store count worldwide) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.7E-18. 0.0000000000000000066745971717
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 6.7E-16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 149,821,775,648,117,952 random variables You don't actually need 149 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.97, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota (GMO corn %)3736445363667386888892938891939393949390929493
Hollister retail store count worldwide (Store count)53288167249309383447510525540571589587568553543538542546497505529




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([37,36,44,53,63,66,73,86,88,88,92,93,88,91,93,93,93,94,93,90,92,94,93,])
array_2 = np.array([5,32,88,167,249,309,383,447,510,525,540,571,589,587,568,553,543,538,542,546,497,505,529,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota"
array_2_name = "Hollister retail store count worldwide"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 1253 · Black Variable ID: 758 · Red Variable ID: 176
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0