about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,237 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Viewership of The Big Bang Theory and the second variable is Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The more people watched "The Big Bang Theory," the more they craved a nostalgic cartoon fix. As the laughter from one cheesy mystery-solving gang faded out, the urge to see another gang of mystery-solving misfits crank up their van and hunt for ghosts grew stronger. It's a classic case of TV show osmosis, where the love for one quirky group of friends led to a surge in interest for another. Or maybe it's just that both shows contain some seriously enigmatic enigmas that demand solving!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a pop art-style visual of a person sitting on a vibrant, retro-style couch, engrossed in watching "The Big Bang Theory" on a TV screen. Include a Scooby Doo plush toy on the coffee table in front of the TV, along with a few Scooby Doo posters adorning the wall in the background. The person should be depicted as occasionally glancing at the plush toy with a curious and interested expression. The color palette should be bold and vivid, with distinct pop art characteristics, such as strong outlines and vibrant, contrasting colors. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Study finds that watching "The Big Bang Theory" leads to increased curiosity about the whereabouts of beloved stoner dog, Scooby Doo. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Cyberpunk Low poly High-tech Steampunk
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Study finds that watching "The Big Bang Theory" leads to increased curiosity about the whereabouts of beloved stoner dog, Scooby Doo
ChatGPT: In the visual scene, a person is seen sitting on a comfortable couch, watching "The Big Bang Theory" on a TV screen. There is a Scooby Doo plush toy sitting on the coffee table in front of the TV, and the person watching the show looks quite interested and engaged. Additionally, there are some Scooby Doo posters on the wall in the background. The person occasionally glances at the Scooby Doo plush toy while watching the show, showing an increased curiosity about the whereabouts of the beloved stoner dog.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In the visual scene, a person is seen sitting on a comfortable couch, watching "The Big Bang Theory" on a TV screen. There is a Scooby Doo plush toy sitting on the coffee table in front of the TV, and the person watching the show looks quite interested and engaged. Additionally, there are some Scooby Doo posters on the wall in the background. The person occasionally glances at the Scooby Doo plush toy while watching the show, showing an increased curiosity about the whereabouts of the beloved stoner dog. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a pop art-style visual of a person sitting on a vibrant, retro-style couch, engrossed in watching "The Big Bang Theory" on a TV screen. Include a Scooby Doo plush toy on the coffee table in front of the TV, along with a few Scooby Doo posters adorning the wall in the background. The person should be depicted as occasionally glancing at the plush toy with a curious and interested expression. The color palette should be bold and vivid, with distinct pop art characteristics, such as strong outlines and vibrant, contrasting colors.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" caused scooby doo where are you (Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends

Journal of Popular Culture Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of television viewership and online search behavior to explore the quirky relationship between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, embarked on a statistical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2019, illuminating the surprisingly intertwined fates of a beloved sitcom and a classic animated canine mystery-solving squad.

As we uncovered this jocular correlation, it became clear that enthusiasts of "The Big Bang Theory" also harbored a peculiar penchant for seeking out the whereabouts of the iconic Scooby and the gang. With our results in hand, we were left pondering the timeless question: "Would that meddling Sheldon Cooper be able to solve the mystery of why 'scooby doo where are you' searches surge alongside television viewership?" Our research contributes a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse, demonstrating that statistical inquiry can be equal parts serious exploration and playful enquiry. Join us in unraveling this comical conundrum, as we shed light on the unexpected ties between television viewing habits and animated canine capers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of television viewership and online search behavior to explore the quirky relationship between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, embarked on a statistical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2019, illuminating the surprisingly intertwined fates of a beloved sitcom and a classic animated canine mystery-solving squad.

As we uncovered this jocular correlation, it became clear that enthusiasts of "The Big Bang Theory" also harbored a peculiar penchant for seeking out the whereabouts of the iconic Scooby and the gang. With our results in hand, we were left pondering the timeless question: "Would that meddling Sheldon Cooper be able to solve the mystery of why 'scooby doo where are you' searches surge alongside television viewership?" Our research contributes a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse, demonstrating that statistical inquiry can be equal parts serious exploration and playful enquiry. Join us in unraveling this comical conundrum, as we shed light on the unexpected ties between television viewing habits and animated canine capers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Gather 'round, fellow academics and aficionados of statistical hilarity, for we are about to embark on a whimsical journey into the realm of television viewership and online search behavior. In this delightful escapade, we shall unravel the unexpected and undoubtedly quirky connection between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'.

As we dive into the data with the gusto of Scooby and the gang chasing after a tantalizing mystery, it becomes apparent that our investigation is not your run-of-the-mill statistical sleuthing. No, dear reader, this research is as peculiar and charming as it gets—a bit like conducting a scientific study on the best dad jokes and their impact on workplace productivity.

Our research team, armed with spreadsheets and caffeinated beverages, set out to explore this enigmatic relationship armed with nothing but curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism. And just like an unexpected punchline, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01, proving that there is indeed more to this tale of TV show viewership and animated canine search trends than meets the eye.

Now, let's face the barking question: What has "The Big Bang Theory" got in common with the escapades of Scooby and the gang? Could it be that the quirky shenanigans of Sheldon and the gang tickled the same part of our brains that yearns for the classic "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!" adventures? It's a head-scratcher, much like wondering whether Schrödinger's cat enjoys feline-style mysteries or prefers a good game of quantum peek-a-boo.

So, buckle up, fellow data enthusiasts, for our research journey promises to shed light on the curious ties between television viewing habits and the alluring mysteries of animated canine capers. It's all fun and games until someone tries to statistically analyze the comedic timing of a knock-knock joke. And believe us, we're not afraid to take on that challenge!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of television viewership and online search behavior to explore the quirky relationship between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, embarked on a statistical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2019, illuminating the surprisingly intertwined fates of a beloved sitcom and a classic animated canine mystery-solving squad.

As we uncovered this jocular correlation, it became clear that enthusiasts of "The Big Bang Theory" also harbored a peculiar penchant for seeking out the whereabouts of the iconic Scooby and the gang. With our results in hand, we were left pondering the timeless question: "Would that meddling Sheldon Cooper be able to solve the mystery of why 'scooby doo where are you' searches surge alongside television viewership?" Our research contributes a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse, demonstrating that statistical inquiry can be equal parts serious exploration and playful enquiry. Join us in unraveling this comical conundrum, as we shed light on the unexpected ties between television viewing habits and animated canine capers.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow academics and aficionados of statistical hilarity, for we are about to embark on a whimsical journey into the realm of television viewership and online search behavior. In this delightful escapade, we shall unravel the unexpected and undoubtedly quirky connection between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'.
As we dive into the data with the gusto of Scooby and the gang chasing after a tantalizing mystery, it becomes apparent that our investigation is not your run-of-the-mill statistical sleuthing. No, dear reader, this research is as peculiar and charming as it gets—a bit like conducting a scientific study on the best dad jokes and their impact on workplace productivity.
Our research team, armed with spreadsheets and caffeinated beverages, set out to explore this enigmatic relationship armed with nothing but curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism. And just like an unexpected punchline, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01, proving that there is indeed more to this tale of TV show viewership and animated canine search trends than meets the eye.
Now, let's face the barking question: What has "The Big Bang Theory" got in common with the escapades of Scooby and the gang? Could it be that the quirky shenanigans of Sheldon and the gang tickled the same part of our brains that yearns for the classic "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!" adventures? It's a head-scratcher, much like wondering whether Schrödinger's cat enjoys feline-style mysteries or prefers a good game of quantum peek-a-boo.
So, buckle up, fellow data enthusiasts, for our research journey promises to shed light on the curious ties between television viewing habits and the alluring mysteries of animated canine capers. It's all fun and games until someone tries to statistically analyze the comedic timing of a knock-knock joke. And believe us, we're not afraid to take on that challenge!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of seemingly disjointed realms has long been a pursuit of researchers seeking unexpected connections amidst the fabric of human behavior. In "Smith and Doe's Empirical Analysis of Television Viewership and Internet Search Patterns," the authors find a correlation between television show popularity and related online searches, paving the way for our own whimsical investigation into the world of TV show viewership and online search behavior. Little did they know that our journey would lead us to ponder the existential question: "Why did the chicken cross the road? To Google 'scooby doo where are you' on the other side, of course."

Expanding upon the findings of Smith and Doe, Jones explores the psychological underpinnings of popular culture phenomena in "The Digital Age: Media Consumption and Online Interactivity." With a keen eye for interdisciplinary inquiry, Jones dissects the interconnected nature of television viewership and online engagement, laying the groundwork for our own foray into the peculiar overlap of "The Big Bang Theory" viewership and 'scooby doo where are you' searches. One can't help but wonder how many Google searches began with "Knock, knock" and ended with "Scooby snacks."

Venturing beyond the boundaries of traditional academic works, we turn to the realms of non-fiction and fiction literature for insights into the whimsical world we seek to unravel. From "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins to "In Search of Lost Time" by Marcel Proust, the diverse landscape of human inquiry becomes a tapestry of inspiration for our investigation. And though we may not be grappling with the complexities of evolutionary biology or the intricacies of memory, our quest for the elusive connection between "The Big Bang Theory" and 'scooby doo where are you' searches wields its own brand of intellectual charm.

In the realm of fictional literature, the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Agatha Christie beckon with their enigmatic puzzles and ingenious sleuths, while J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series offers a magical twist to the art of unraveling mysteries. One can't help but imagine Sherlock Holmes tackling the case of the curious correlation, deducing that the game is a'foot, or Hermione Granger casting a spell to uncover the secrets behind the surge in 'scooby doo where are you' searches. Oh, the possibilities of a crossover episode!

From the whimsical pages of non-fiction and fiction, we delve into the playful realm of animated series and children's shows that have left an indelible mark on our collective imaginations. As we revisit the escapades of Scooby and the gang in "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!" and the endearing charm of "The Big Bang Theory," we find ourselves pondering questions as timeless as they are absurd. Why not explore the statistical significance of Velma's glasses or conduct a qualitative analysis of the most frequently uttered catchphrases by Sheldon Cooper and Shaggy Rogers? It's all in good fun until someone presents a statistical analysis of the comedic timing of Scooby's "Ruh-roh!" - and spoiler alert, we just might do that.

Our journey, filled with twists and laughs, consolidates the serious pursuit of knowledge with a playful spirit, reminding us that even in the realm of scholarly inquiry, the unexpected and the whimsical can hold profound insights. As we envelop ourselves in the joviality of statistical exploration, we are left with the comforting thought that amidst complex correlations and rigorous analysis, there's always room for a well-timed dad joke to lighten the mood. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything - including our findings on the entwined fates of "The Big Bang Theory" and 'scooby doo where are you' searches.

And with that, we leave you with the anticipation of our forthcoming findings, quirks and all, knowing that our delightful pursuit of knowledge will shed light on the unexpected intersections of human curiosity, statistical inquiry, and the shared love for a good laugh.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of television viewership and online search behavior to explore the quirky relationship between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, embarked on a statistical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2019, illuminating the surprisingly intertwined fates of a beloved sitcom and a classic animated canine mystery-solving squad.

As we uncovered this jocular correlation, it became clear that enthusiasts of "The Big Bang Theory" also harbored a peculiar penchant for seeking out the whereabouts of the iconic Scooby and the gang. With our results in hand, we were left pondering the timeless question: "Would that meddling Sheldon Cooper be able to solve the mystery of why 'scooby doo where are you' searches surge alongside television viewership?" Our research contributes a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse, demonstrating that statistical inquiry can be equal parts serious exploration and playful enquiry. Join us in unraveling this comical conundrum, as we shed light on the unexpected ties between television viewing habits and animated canine capers.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow academics and aficionados of statistical hilarity, for we are about to embark on a whimsical journey into the realm of television viewership and online search behavior. In this delightful escapade, we shall unravel the unexpected and undoubtedly quirky connection between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'.
As we dive into the data with the gusto of Scooby and the gang chasing after a tantalizing mystery, it becomes apparent that our investigation is not your run-of-the-mill statistical sleuthing. No, dear reader, this research is as peculiar and charming as it gets—a bit like conducting a scientific study on the best dad jokes and their impact on workplace productivity.
Our research team, armed with spreadsheets and caffeinated beverages, set out to explore this enigmatic relationship armed with nothing but curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism. And just like an unexpected punchline, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01, proving that there is indeed more to this tale of TV show viewership and animated canine search trends than meets the eye.
Now, let's face the barking question: What has "The Big Bang Theory" got in common with the escapades of Scooby and the gang? Could it be that the quirky shenanigans of Sheldon and the gang tickled the same part of our brains that yearns for the classic "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!" adventures? It's a head-scratcher, much like wondering whether Schrödinger's cat enjoys feline-style mysteries or prefers a good game of quantum peek-a-boo.
So, buckle up, fellow data enthusiasts, for our research journey promises to shed light on the curious ties between television viewing habits and the alluring mysteries of animated canine capers. It's all fun and games until someone tries to statistically analyze the comedic timing of a knock-knock joke. And believe us, we're not afraid to take on that challenge!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To peel back the layers of this delightfully perplexing research onion, we employed a meticulously crafted and exquisitely convoluted methodology that would make even the most erudite statistician raise an eyebrow. Our first step involved casting a wide net across the tempestuous sea of the internet, gathering data from diverse sources ranging from the hallowed halls of Wikipedia to the ebulliently fluctuating domain of Google Trends. The data, dating from the cosmic epoch of 2008 to the voguish days of 2019, provided us with a robust foundation for our expedition.

With our treasure trove of data firmly in hand, we set sail on the rough seas of statistical analysis. We ignited the engine of our trusty statistical software and maneuvered through the turbulent waters of correlation analysis. As our ship cut across the digital currents, we calculated the correlation coefficient with the precision of a particle accelerator and determined the p-value with the finesse of a quantum entanglement dance. It was a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned data wranglers shake a tail feather.

To ensure the veracity of our findings, we conducted numerous robustness checks, scrutinizing the data with the tenacity of a detective following the trail of breadcrumbs. We employed various statistical techniques, including time series analysis and cross-correlation analysis, to interrogate the relationship between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and the intrepid searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our methodology was as thorough and comprehensive as a thoroughbred racehorse diligently navigating the hurdles on a pun-derful racetrack.

In the spirit of scholarly camaraderie, we embraced an open and transparent approach to our methodology, recognizing that transparency is the hallmark of scientific inquiry. We documented each step of our analysis with the fastidiousness of a curator cataloging precious artifacts in a museum of statistical wonders. Our methodology was as transparent as Sheldon Cooper's disdain for anything less than empirical rigor – and trust us, that's saying a lot!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9565899, r-squared of 0.9150643, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of television viewership and online search behavior to explore the quirky relationship between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, embarked on a statistical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2019, illuminating the surprisingly intertwined fates of a beloved sitcom and a classic animated canine mystery-solving squad.

As we uncovered this jocular correlation, it became clear that enthusiasts of "The Big Bang Theory" also harbored a peculiar penchant for seeking out the whereabouts of the iconic Scooby and the gang. With our results in hand, we were left pondering the timeless question: "Would that meddling Sheldon Cooper be able to solve the mystery of why 'scooby doo where are you' searches surge alongside television viewership?" Our research contributes a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse, demonstrating that statistical inquiry can be equal parts serious exploration and playful enquiry. Join us in unraveling this comical conundrum, as we shed light on the unexpected ties between television viewing habits and animated canine capers.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Gather 'round, fellow academics and aficionados of statistical hilarity, for we are about to embark on a whimsical journey into the realm of television viewership and online search behavior. In this delightful escapade, we shall unravel the unexpected and undoubtedly quirky connection between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'.
As we dive into the data with the gusto of Scooby and the gang chasing after a tantalizing mystery, it becomes apparent that our investigation is not your run-of-the-mill statistical sleuthing. No, dear reader, this research is as peculiar and charming as it gets—a bit like conducting a scientific study on the best dad jokes and their impact on workplace productivity.
Our research team, armed with spreadsheets and caffeinated beverages, set out to explore this enigmatic relationship armed with nothing but curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism. And just like an unexpected punchline, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01, proving that there is indeed more to this tale of TV show viewership and animated canine search trends than meets the eye.
Now, let's face the barking question: What has "The Big Bang Theory" got in common with the escapades of Scooby and the gang? Could it be that the quirky shenanigans of Sheldon and the gang tickled the same part of our brains that yearns for the classic "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!" adventures? It's a head-scratcher, much like wondering whether Schrödinger's cat enjoys feline-style mysteries or prefers a good game of quantum peek-a-boo.
So, buckle up, fellow data enthusiasts, for our research journey promises to shed light on the curious ties between television viewing habits and the alluring mysteries of animated canine capers. It's all fun and games until someone tries to statistically analyze the comedic timing of a knock-knock joke. And believe us, we're not afraid to take on that challenge!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The culmination of our whimsical expedition into the interconnected realms of television viewership and online searches for canine capers has yielded fascinating results. Our correlation analysis unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9565899, indicating a striking linear relationship between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. It appears that Shaggy and Scooby aren't the only ones embarking on peculiar journeys – it seems our dear viewers of "The Big Bang Theory" are on a search mission of their own, albeit in the form of internet searches.

Now, hold on to your scientific hats, because we also uncovered an impressive r-squared value of 0.9150643. This finding demonstrates that approximately 91.5% of the variability in 'scooby doo where are you' searches can be explained by the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". It's a statistical revelation that's sure to leave both data enthusiasts and pop culture aficionados scratching their heads in disbelief, much like trying to comprehend the physics of how Scooby snacks seem to defy all laws of canine consumption.

To further solidify our findings, we conducted hypothesis testing and unearthed a p-value of less than 0.01. This significant result provides unequivocal evidence that the observed correlation is not due to random chance, but rather a genuine association between two seemingly disparate domains. It's akin to stumbling upon a rare species of statistical unicorn – a phenomenon that's as peculiar as it is mesmerizing.

In line with our groundbreaking results, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the striking relationship between the variables. This visual representation serves as a testament to the undeniable connection between the cult sitcom and the perennial search for the elusive Scooby and his mystery-solving compatriots. As we gazed upon the scatterplot, we couldn't help but revel in the whimsy of our findings – after all, it's not every day that one stumbles upon such an entertaining intersection of television and animated canine antics.

Amidst our statistical revelry, it's worth pondering: Could it be that the minds behind "The Big Bang Theory" secretly embedded cryptic clues related to Scooby-Doo's whereabouts in each episode, prompting viewers to embark on their very own mystery-solving escapades? This discovery might just be the missing piece to a puzzle that's as confounding as trying to decipher the true meaning of the universe through a game of charades.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the unexpected correlation between TV show viewership and animated canine search trends but also serves as a reminder that statistical exploration can be both informative and delightfully amusing. After all, who says academia can't have a sense of humor? It's like trying to quantify the comedic value of a well-timed pun – a challenge that's as entertaining as it is enlightening.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of television viewership and online search behavior to explore the quirky relationship between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, embarked on a statistical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2019, illuminating the surprisingly intertwined fates of a beloved sitcom and a classic animated canine mystery-solving squad.

As we uncovered this jocular correlation, it became clear that enthusiasts of "The Big Bang Theory" also harbored a peculiar penchant for seeking out the whereabouts of the iconic Scooby and the gang. With our results in hand, we were left pondering the timeless question: "Would that meddling Sheldon Cooper be able to solve the mystery of why 'scooby doo where are you' searches surge alongside television viewership?" Our research contributes a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse, demonstrating that statistical inquiry can be equal parts serious exploration and playful enquiry. Join us in unraveling this comical conundrum, as we shed light on the unexpected ties between television viewing habits and animated canine capers.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of seemingly disjointed realms has long been a pursuit of researchers seeking unexpected connections amidst the fabric of human behavior. In "Smith and Doe's Empirical Analysis of Television Viewership and Internet Search Patterns," the authors find a correlation between television show popularity and related online searches, paving the way for our own whimsical investigation into the world of TV show viewership and online search behavior. Little did they know that our journey would lead us to ponder the existential question: "Why did the chicken cross the road? To Google 'scooby doo where are you' on the other side, of course."
Expanding upon the findings of Smith and Doe, Jones explores the psychological underpinnings of popular culture phenomena in "The Digital Age: Media Consumption and Online Interactivity." With a keen eye for interdisciplinary inquiry, Jones dissects the interconnected nature of television viewership and online engagement, laying the groundwork for our own foray into the peculiar overlap of "The Big Bang Theory" viewership and 'scooby doo where are you' searches. One can't help but wonder how many Google searches began with "Knock, knock" and ended with "Scooby snacks."
Venturing beyond the boundaries of traditional academic works, we turn to the realms of non-fiction and fiction literature for insights into the whimsical world we seek to unravel. From "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins to "In Search of Lost Time" by Marcel Proust, the diverse landscape of human inquiry becomes a tapestry of inspiration for our investigation. And though we may not be grappling with the complexities of evolutionary biology or the intricacies of memory, our quest for the elusive connection between "The Big Bang Theory" and 'scooby doo where are you' searches wields its own brand of intellectual charm.
In the realm of fictional literature, the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Agatha Christie beckon with their enigmatic puzzles and ingenious sleuths, while J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series offers a magical twist to the art of unraveling mysteries. One can't help but imagine Sherlock Holmes tackling the case of the curious correlation, deducing that the game is a'foot, or Hermione Granger casting a spell to uncover the secrets behind the surge in 'scooby doo where are you' searches. Oh, the possibilities of a crossover episode!
From the whimsical pages of non-fiction and fiction, we delve into the playful realm of animated series and children's shows that have left an indelible mark on our collective imaginations. As we revisit the escapades of Scooby and the gang in "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!" and the endearing charm of "The Big Bang Theory," we find ourselves pondering questions as timeless as they are absurd. Why not explore the statistical significance of Velma's glasses or conduct a qualitative analysis of the most frequently uttered catchphrases by Sheldon Cooper and Shaggy Rogers? It's all in good fun until someone presents a statistical analysis of the comedic timing of Scooby's "Ruh-roh!" - and spoiler alert, we just might do that.
Our journey, filled with twists and laughs, consolidates the serious pursuit of knowledge with a playful spirit, reminding us that even in the realm of scholarly inquiry, the unexpected and the whimsical can hold profound insights. As we envelop ourselves in the joviality of statistical exploration, we are left with the comforting thought that amidst complex correlations and rigorous analysis, there's always room for a well-timed dad joke to lighten the mood. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything - including our findings on the entwined fates of "The Big Bang Theory" and 'scooby doo where are you' searches.
And with that, we leave you with the anticipation of our forthcoming findings, quirks and all, knowing that our delightful pursuit of knowledge will shed light on the unexpected intersections of human curiosity, statistical inquiry, and the shared love for a good laugh.

[[RESULTS]]
The culmination of our whimsical expedition into the interconnected realms of television viewership and online searches for canine capers has yielded fascinating results. Our correlation analysis unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9565899, indicating a striking linear relationship between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. It appears that Shaggy and Scooby aren't the only ones embarking on peculiar journeys – it seems our dear viewers of "The Big Bang Theory" are on a search mission of their own, albeit in the form of internet searches.
Now, hold on to your scientific hats, because we also uncovered an impressive r-squared value of 0.9150643. This finding demonstrates that approximately 91.5% of the variability in 'scooby doo where are you' searches can be explained by the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". It's a statistical revelation that's sure to leave both data enthusiasts and pop culture aficionados scratching their heads in disbelief, much like trying to comprehend the physics of how Scooby snacks seem to defy all laws of canine consumption.
To further solidify our findings, we conducted hypothesis testing and unearthed a p-value of less than 0.01. This significant result provides unequivocal evidence that the observed correlation is not due to random chance, but rather a genuine association between two seemingly disparate domains. It's akin to stumbling upon a rare species of statistical unicorn – a phenomenon that's as peculiar as it is mesmerizing.
In line with our groundbreaking results, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the striking relationship between the variables. This visual representation serves as a testament to the undeniable connection between the cult sitcom and the perennial search for the elusive Scooby and his mystery-solving compatriots. As we gazed upon the scatterplot, we couldn't help but revel in the whimsy of our findings – after all, it's not every day that one stumbles upon such an entertaining intersection of television and animated canine antics.
Amidst our statistical revelry, it's worth pondering: Could it be that the minds behind "The Big Bang Theory" secretly embedded cryptic clues related to Scooby-Doo's whereabouts in each episode, prompting viewers to embark on their very own mystery-solving escapades? This discovery might just be the missing piece to a puzzle that's as confounding as trying to decipher the true meaning of the universe through a game of charades.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the unexpected correlation between TV show viewership and animated canine search trends but also serves as a reminder that statistical exploration can be both informative and delightfully amusing. After all, who says academia can't have a sense of humor? It's like trying to quantify the comedic value of a well-timed pun – a challenge that's as entertaining as it is enlightening.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the correlation between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you' has left us pondering the very essence of the interconnectedness of human behavior and popular culture. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01, the robust statistical evidence supports our initial intuition that there exists a whimsical harmony between fans of the iconic sitcom and those in pursuit of the elusive Scooby-Doo and his mystery-solving escapades. It's as if Sheldon Cooper himself donned the deerstalker hat and exclaimed, "Elementary, my dear Scooby!"

Our results extend the work of Smith and Doe, almost as if we're passing the statistical baton in a comical relay race of inquiry. The robust correlation coefficient aligns with their empirical findings, suggesting that the comedic allure of "The Big Bang Theory" may indeed prompt viewers to engage in lighthearted online sleuthing for the enigmatic Scooby-Doo. It's as if fans of the show are saying, "Ruh-roh, there goes my evening - time to embark on a 'scooby doo where are you' search spree!"

Jones' exploration of media consumption and online interactivity finds an unexpected resonance in our results, underscoring the interconnected nature of television viewership and online engagement. Our study adds a playful twist to the academic discourse, demonstrating that the pursuit of knowledge can be just as whimsical as it is illuminating. It's akin to finding the statistical significance of a pun in an academic paper - a delightful discovery that leaves us grinning like Cheshire cats.

We couldn't help but revel in the statistical revelry with an r-squared value of 0.9150643 - a finding that encapsulates the whimsy of our research. This value represents the shared delight of finding a hidden gem in an unexpected place, much like stumbling upon the Scooby-Doo gang at the heart of our statistical analysis. It's almost like discovering a mystery-solving duo in the midst of an equations sheet.

The significant p-value mirrors the unmasking of a clever disguise in a classic Scooby-Doo episode – a moment of revelation that confirms the genuine association between our quirky variables. It's as if the statistical evidence boldly proclaims, "And I would have gotten away with my skepticism if it weren't for those meddling p-values!"

Our findings, presented in Figure 1, serve as a visual testament to the undeniable connection between a beloved sitcom and the timeless quest for Scooby snacks and mysteries. It's akin to capturing a candid moment of statistical serendipity, immortalizing the enigmatic dance of variables in a scatterplot for all to enjoy.

Our research not only sheds light on an unexpected correlation but also serves as a whimsical reminder that statistical exploration doesn't have to be devoid of humor. It's like finding the comedic value of a well-timed dad joke in the midst of scholarly inquiry – a delightful surprise that leaves us appreciating the lighthearted side of rigorous analysis. And after all, in the realm of academia, why don't researchers ever procrastinate? They just ponder their findings for extended periods - a phenomenon as timeless as the search for Scooby himself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of television viewership and online search behavior to explore the quirky relationship between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, embarked on a statistical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2019, illuminating the surprisingly intertwined fates of a beloved sitcom and a classic animated canine mystery-solving squad.

As we uncovered this jocular correlation, it became clear that enthusiasts of "The Big Bang Theory" also harbored a peculiar penchant for seeking out the whereabouts of the iconic Scooby and the gang. With our results in hand, we were left pondering the timeless question: "Would that meddling Sheldon Cooper be able to solve the mystery of why 'scooby doo where are you' searches surge alongside television viewership?" Our research contributes a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse, demonstrating that statistical inquiry can be equal parts serious exploration and playful enquiry. Join us in unraveling this comical conundrum, as we shed light on the unexpected ties between television viewing habits and animated canine capers.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Gather 'round, fellow academics and aficionados of statistical hilarity, for we are about to embark on a whimsical journey into the realm of television viewership and online search behavior. In this delightful escapade, we shall unravel the unexpected and undoubtedly quirky connection between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'.
As we dive into the data with the gusto of Scooby and the gang chasing after a tantalizing mystery, it becomes apparent that our investigation is not your run-of-the-mill statistical sleuthing. No, dear reader, this research is as peculiar and charming as it gets—a bit like conducting a scientific study on the best dad jokes and their impact on workplace productivity.
Our research team, armed with spreadsheets and caffeinated beverages, set out to explore this enigmatic relationship armed with nothing but curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism. And just like an unexpected punchline, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01, proving that there is indeed more to this tale of TV show viewership and animated canine search trends than meets the eye.
Now, let's face the barking question: What has "The Big Bang Theory" got in common with the escapades of Scooby and the gang? Could it be that the quirky shenanigans of Sheldon and the gang tickled the same part of our brains that yearns for the classic "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!" adventures? It's a head-scratcher, much like wondering whether Schrödinger's cat enjoys feline-style mysteries or prefers a good game of quantum peek-a-boo.
So, buckle up, fellow data enthusiasts, for our research journey promises to shed light on the curious ties between television viewing habits and the alluring mysteries of animated canine capers. It's all fun and games until someone tries to statistically analyze the comedic timing of a knock-knock joke. And believe us, we're not afraid to take on that challenge!

[[RESULTS]]
The culmination of our whimsical expedition into the interconnected realms of television viewership and online searches for canine capers has yielded fascinating results. Our correlation analysis unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9565899, indicating a striking linear relationship between the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. It appears that Shaggy and Scooby aren't the only ones embarking on peculiar journeys – it seems our dear viewers of "The Big Bang Theory" are on a search mission of their own, albeit in the form of internet searches.
Now, hold on to your scientific hats, because we also uncovered an impressive r-squared value of 0.9150643. This finding demonstrates that approximately 91.5% of the variability in 'scooby doo where are you' searches can be explained by the viewership of "The Big Bang Theory". It's a statistical revelation that's sure to leave both data enthusiasts and pop culture aficionados scratching their heads in disbelief, much like trying to comprehend the physics of how Scooby snacks seem to defy all laws of canine consumption.
To further solidify our findings, we conducted hypothesis testing and unearthed a p-value of less than 0.01. This significant result provides unequivocal evidence that the observed correlation is not due to random chance, but rather a genuine association between two seemingly disparate domains. It's akin to stumbling upon a rare species of statistical unicorn – a phenomenon that's as peculiar as it is mesmerizing.
In line with our groundbreaking results, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the striking relationship between the variables. This visual representation serves as a testament to the undeniable connection between the cult sitcom and the perennial search for the elusive Scooby and his mystery-solving compatriots. As we gazed upon the scatterplot, we couldn't help but revel in the whimsy of our findings – after all, it's not every day that one stumbles upon such an entertaining intersection of television and animated canine antics.
Amidst our statistical revelry, it's worth pondering: Could it be that the minds behind "The Big Bang Theory" secretly embedded cryptic clues related to Scooby-Doo's whereabouts in each episode, prompting viewers to embark on their very own mystery-solving escapades? This discovery might just be the missing piece to a puzzle that's as confounding as trying to decipher the true meaning of the universe through a game of charades.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the unexpected correlation between TV show viewership and animated canine search trends but also serves as a reminder that statistical exploration can be both informative and delightfully amusing. After all, who says academia can't have a sense of humor? It's like trying to quantify the comedic value of a well-timed pun – a challenge that's as entertaining as it is enlightening.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the evidence we've unearthed suggests that there's more to the relationship between viewers of "The Big Bang Theory" and searches for 'scooby doo where are you' than meets the eye. It seems that viewers of the sitcom are not only captivated by Sheldon's quirky humor but also by the enigmatic escapades of Scooby and the gang. This correlation between two seemingly unrelated phenomena is as surprising as realizing that the speed of light gets jealous when it's overshadowed.

Our statistical journey has revealed a strong correlation coefficient and a p-value that's so tiny, it's like trying to locate microscopic Scooby snacks in a haystack. With approximately 91.5% of the variability in searches for 'scooby doo where are you' being explained by "The Big Bang Theory" viewership, it's like finding out that Scooby himself has been trained in the art of statistical analysis.

Our findings contribute a whimsical twist to the scholarly landscape, proving that science and statistics can be as entertaining as a stand-up routine by a particle physicist. But dare we say, the real mystery remains unsolved: why do viewers of "The Big Bang Theory" and Scooby-Doo enthusiasts seem to share a common quest for knowledge?

As we bid adieu to this lighthearted venture, it's clear that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we've reached a conclusion as solid as the periodic table – and with just as much potential for puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Popular Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Canine Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Big Scooby-Bang Theory: A Quantitative Analysis of TV Show Viewership and Animated Canine Search Trends with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the whimsical world of television viewership and online search behavior to explore the quirky relationship between viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" and Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'. Our research team, armed with a plethora of data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, embarked on a statistical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9565899 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2019, illuminating the surprisingly intertwined fates of a beloved sitcom and a classic animated canine mystery-solving squad.
As we uncovered this jocular correlation, it became clear that enthusiasts of "The Big Bang Theory" also harbored a peculiar penchant for seeking out the whereabouts of the iconic Scooby and the gang. With our results in hand, we were left pondering the timeless question: "Would that meddling Sheldon Cooper be able to solve the mystery of why 'scooby doo where are you' searches surge alongside television viewership?" Our research contributes a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse, demonstrating that statistical inquiry can be equal parts serious exploration and playful enquiry. Join us in unraveling this comical conundrum, as we shed light on the unexpected ties between television viewing habits and animated canine capers.

ChatGPT:

The Big Bang Theory viewership, Scooby Doo, Google search trends, TV show viewership analysis, animated canine viewership, television viewership correlation, Google Trends analysis, Big Bang Theory and Scooby Doo correlation, TV show viewership and search behavior, animated canine search trends, correlation between TV viewership and online search behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"
Detailed data title: Average viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" by season
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory"

Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'

Correlation r = 0.9565899 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9150643 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory") over the 12 years from 2008 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-6. 0.0000011285447730120575000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.00011% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 886,097 random variables You don't actually need 886 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" (Viewers)83100000001000000000014140000000132100000001582000000018680000000199600000001905000000020360000000189900000001863000000017310000000
Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you' (Rel. search volume)26.8333344439.083342.833355.55656.553.2549.666747.416748




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([8310000000,10000000000,14140000000,13210000000,15820000000,18680000000,19960000000,19050000000,20360000000,18990000000,18630000000,17310000000,])
array_2 = np.array([26.8333,34,44,39.0833,42.8333,55.5,56,56.5,53.25,49.6667,47.4167,48,])
array_1_name = "Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory""
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 1237 · Black Variable ID: 146 · Red Variable ID: 1382
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0