Download png, svg
AI explanation
As Canada's wealth grew, they developed a strong demand for Mississippi's finest adhesive bonding products. This led to a surge in production, creating a pressing need for more adhesive bonding machine operators in the state. It's a sticky situation, but hey, nothing brings people together like good old Canadian prosperity and Mississippi's bond with the adhesive industry!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Create an image of a factory in Mississippi, USA. The scene is bustling with activity as workers operate adhesive bonding machines to attach labels to maple syrup bottles. The machines whir as the operators work diligently to keep up with the increased production, reflecting the positive impact of Canada's stronger economy on job creation in Mississippi. The factory is filled with the warm glow of fluorescent lights, and the workers are seen moving purposefully among the machinery. The backdrop showcases the labeled maple syrup bottles arranged neatly on conveyor belts and pallets, waiting to be shipped. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: The increase in GDP per capita in Canada caused the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi to increase because the stronger Canadian economy led to an influx of maple syrup imports, which in turn created a greater demand for adhesive-bonded maple syrup bottle labels, thus requiring more operators in Mississippi to meet the demand.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Hyper-realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A photo-realistic image Futuristic
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. The increase in GDP per capita in Canada caused the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi to increase because the stronger Canadian economy led to an influx of maple syrup imports, which in turn created a greater demand for adhesive-bonded maple syrup bottle labels, thus requiring more operators in Mississippi to meet the demand.
ChatGPT: A factory in Mississippi, USA, is bustling with activity as workers operate adhesive bonding machines to attach labels to maple syrup bottles. The increase in GDP per capita in Canada leads to a surge in maple syrup imports, causing a high demand for labeled bottles. The machines whir as the operators work diligently to keep up with the increased production, reflecting the positive impact of Canada's stronger economy on job creation in Mississippi.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: A factory in Mississippi, USA, is bustling with activity as workers operate adhesive bonding machines to attach labels to maple syrup bottles. The increase in GDP per capita in Canada leads to a surge in maple syrup imports, causing a high demand for labeled bottles. The machines whir as the operators work diligently to keep up with the increased production, reflecting the positive impact of Canada's stronger economy on job creation in Mississippi. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Create an image of a factory in Mississippi, USA. The scene is bustling with activity as workers operate adhesive bonding machines to attach labels to maple syrup bottles. The machines whir as the operators work diligently to keep up with the increased production, reflecting the positive impact of Canada's stronger economy on job creation in Mississippi. The factory is filled with the warm glow of fluorescent lights, and the workers are seen moving purposefully among the machinery. The backdrop showcases the labeled maple syrup bottles arranged neatly on conveyor belts and pallets, waiting to be shipped.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GDP per capita in Canada caused The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi to increase.
AI academic paper
Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators The Journal of Economic Adherents and Industrial Mechanics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from World Bank and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. By analyzing data from the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover the adhesive truth behind this unexpected correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, there's more to stick to than meets the eye!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. By analyzing data from the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover the adhesive truth behind this unexpected correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, there's more to stick to than meets the eye!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
You may have heard the saying, "Behind every successful economy is a strong adhesive bonding machine operator," or maybe not. Nevertheless, in the world of economic research, we often come across unexpected connections and correlations that leave us scratching our heads and reaching for the nearest roll of duct tape. In this paper, we embark on a sticky investigation into the relationship between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi.
You might think this topic is a bit off the wall, but as economists, we are always looking for innovative and sometimes unconventional ways to understand and predict economic trends. After all, there’s nothing wrong with a little creativity, especially if it can bring some adhesion to our understanding of economic growth.
Speaking of adhesion, what do you call a group of adhesive bonding machine operators? The bond squad!
Now, let's address the sticky details of our study. We crunch the numbers, analyze the data, and apply the most robust statistical methods to investigate this seemingly peculiar relationship. Our aim is not just to add another layer of complexity to economic analysis but to uncover a bond that may have been overlooked in previous research.
Before we dive into the sticky details, let's take a moment to ponder the peculiarities of this connection. As we peel back the layers of economic data, we may find ourselves wondering how two seemingly unrelated factors could be so closely linked. But as they say, you can’t ignore the glue-stats!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. By analyzing data from the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover the adhesive truth behind this unexpected correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, there's more to stick to than meets the eye!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
You may have heard the saying, "Behind every successful economy is a strong adhesive bonding machine operator," or maybe not. Nevertheless, in the world of economic research, we often come across unexpected connections and correlations that leave us scratching our heads and reaching for the nearest roll of duct tape. In this paper, we embark on a sticky investigation into the relationship between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi.
You might think this topic is a bit off the wall, but as economists, we are always looking for innovative and sometimes unconventional ways to understand and predict economic trends. After all, there’s nothing wrong with a little creativity, especially if it can bring some adhesion to our understanding of economic growth.
Speaking of adhesion, what do you call a group of adhesive bonding machine operators? The bond squad!
Now, let's address the sticky details of our study. We crunch the numbers, analyze the data, and apply the most robust statistical methods to investigate this seemingly peculiar relationship. Our aim is not just to add another layer of complexity to economic analysis but to uncover a bond that may have been overlooked in previous research.
Before we dive into the sticky details, let's take a moment to ponder the peculiarities of this connection. As we peel back the layers of economic data, we may find ourselves wondering how two seemingly unrelated factors could be so closely linked. But as they say, you can’t ignore the glue-stats!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a thorough analysis of GDP per capita in Canada and identified various determinants of economic growth in their study "Economic Development and Beyond." Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the labor market dynamics in Mississippi, examining factors influencing employment patterns in their work "Labor Force Trends in the Southern United States." These studies shed light on the economic landscape, but they did not specifically address the curious interplay between adhesive bonding machine operators and GDP per capita.
It's no surprise that the economic world often sticks to the conventional factors influencing growth, but our investigation opens the door to a more adhesive perspective. As we uncover the unexpected correlation between adhesive bonding and economic prosperity, we may find ourselves stuck on this intriguing phenomenon. Speaking of being stuck, did you hear about the adhesive that went to a party? It was the life of the tape!
Turning to the world of non-fiction literature, "The Adhesive Revolution: From Glue Sticks to Economic Sticks" by Bond and Stick (2017) provides insights into the role of adhesives in various industries. Furthermore, "Sticky Situations: Understanding Economic Relationships" by Glue and Gum (2019) offers a comprehensive exploration of unorthodox economic connections. While these works may not directly address our specific research question, they offer valuable perspectives on the adhesive world of economics.
Now, let's take a humorous detour into the realm of fiction that surprisingly aligns with our research topic. "The Adhesive Alchemist" by Elmer Strong is a tale of a wizard who discovers the magical properties of economic adhesion. Additionally, "The Bonding Chronicles" by Sticky McBinderson presents a riveting story of adhesive bonding machine operators navigating economic challenges in captivating fashion. These fictional works may not offer empirical evidence, but they certainly add an imaginative twist to our investigation.
Speaking of imaginative twists, did you hear the joke about the adhesive bonding machine operator? They always stick to their job no matter what!
In today's digital age, social media platforms have become hubs for intriguing insights. A tweet by @EconGeek123 stated, "Who knew that the number of adhesive bonding machine operators could hold the key to economic prosperity? #StickToSuccess." While this tweet may seem lighthearted, it reflects a growing awareness of the unconventional factors shaping economic landscapes. Another post by @AdhesiveAnalyst highlighted the overlooked role of adhesion in economic modeling, sparking discussions about the potential impact of adhesive bonding on GDP per capita.
These diverse sources, ranging from academic studies to fiction literature and social media discourse, collectively contribute to a multifaceted understanding of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. As we stick to the task of unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we must not lose sight of the adhesive humor and creativity that infuse our research journey. After all, what's an economic investigation without a few sticky puns along the way?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from World Bank and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2010 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. By analyzing data from the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover the adhesive truth behind this unexpected correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, there's more to stick to than meets the eye!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
You may have heard the saying, "Behind every successful economy is a strong adhesive bonding machine operator," or maybe not. Nevertheless, in the world of economic research, we often come across unexpected connections and correlations that leave us scratching our heads and reaching for the nearest roll of duct tape. In this paper, we embark on a sticky investigation into the relationship between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi.
You might think this topic is a bit off the wall, but as economists, we are always looking for innovative and sometimes unconventional ways to understand and predict economic trends. After all, there’s nothing wrong with a little creativity, especially if it can bring some adhesion to our understanding of economic growth.
Speaking of adhesion, what do you call a group of adhesive bonding machine operators? The bond squad!
Now, let's address the sticky details of our study. We crunch the numbers, analyze the data, and apply the most robust statistical methods to investigate this seemingly peculiar relationship. Our aim is not just to add another layer of complexity to economic analysis but to uncover a bond that may have been overlooked in previous research.
Before we dive into the sticky details, let's take a moment to ponder the peculiarities of this connection. As we peel back the layers of economic data, we may find ourselves wondering how two seemingly unrelated factors could be so closely linked. But as they say, you can’t ignore the glue-stats!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To begin unraveling the bond between GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi, we undertook a multi-faceted approach to data collection and analysis. Our team scoured the digital landscape, like intrepid explorers in search of adhesive treasure, gathering data from reputable sources such as the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. We utilized data spanning the years 2010 to 2022, ensuring a comprehensive overview of economic and labor trends.
Now, onto the nitty-gritty of our research methods. We employed a combination of quantitative and qualitative analyses to peel back the layers of this enigmatic connection. First, we obtained the GDP per capita data for Canada, eliciting a deep understanding of the economic landscape in this maple-leafed nation. Next, we delved into the labor force statistics of Mississippi, meticulously counting the number of skilled adhesive bonding machine operators, who, it turns out, are truly stuck on their work.
As we embarked on this data collection odyssey, we were met with the occasional surprise – much like unwrapping an unexpected gift. You might say we were stuck with these surprising findings, much like an adhesive bonding machine operator who accidentally spills a tube of glue... but I digress.
With our data in hand, we performed a series of rigorous statistical analyses, applying econometric models and correlation tests to discern the relationship between GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. Our methods were as robust as a high-quality adhesive, ensuring our findings could withstand the most intense scrutiny.
Additionally, we leveraged advanced regression techniques to control for potential confounding variables and extraneous factors that might have attempted to sneak their way into our analysis – a bit like those rogue pieces of tape that seem to cling to everything except the intended surface. Our goal was to isolate the true essence of the connection between economic prosperity and the industrious individuals responsible for joining materials together with adhesive technologies.
In essence, our methodological approach was akin to peeling apart the layers of economic data, much like separating stubborn stickers from a new kitchen appliance. As we uncover the adhesive truths of this relationship, our hope is to shed light on an underexplored facet of economic dynamics and, perhaps, offer a few chuckles along the way. Just remember, in the world of economic research, there's nothing wrong with a little sticking to the unconventional!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from World Bank and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2010 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8949750, r-squared of 0.8009803, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. By analyzing data from the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover the adhesive truth behind this unexpected correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, there's more to stick to than meets the eye!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
You may have heard the saying, "Behind every successful economy is a strong adhesive bonding machine operator," or maybe not. Nevertheless, in the world of economic research, we often come across unexpected connections and correlations that leave us scratching our heads and reaching for the nearest roll of duct tape. In this paper, we embark on a sticky investigation into the relationship between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi.
You might think this topic is a bit off the wall, but as economists, we are always looking for innovative and sometimes unconventional ways to understand and predict economic trends. After all, there’s nothing wrong with a little creativity, especially if it can bring some adhesion to our understanding of economic growth.
Speaking of adhesion, what do you call a group of adhesive bonding machine operators? The bond squad!
Now, let's address the sticky details of our study. We crunch the numbers, analyze the data, and apply the most robust statistical methods to investigate this seemingly peculiar relationship. Our aim is not just to add another layer of complexity to economic analysis but to uncover a bond that may have been overlooked in previous research.
Before we dive into the sticky details, let's take a moment to ponder the peculiarities of this connection. As we peel back the layers of economic data, we may find ourselves wondering how two seemingly unrelated factors could be so closely linked. But as they say, you can’t ignore the glue-stats!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2010 to 2022 revealed a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8009803, indicating that approximately 80% of the variability in the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi can be explained by the GDP per capita in Canada. Talk about sticking together!
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant, providing robust evidence of the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, the bond is indisputably strong.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the tight connection between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. The points on the plot form a clear upward trend, emphasizing the adhesive nature of this relationship. It's a bond that simply cannot be ignored!
This finding prompts us to reconsider the traditional factors influencing economic growth and labor dynamics. Perhaps there's more "sticking power" in the labor force than previously acknowledged, and adhesive bonding machine operators may play a more substantial role in economic development than initially presumed. It seems that sticky situations can be rather illuminating when it comes to understanding economic trends.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. By analyzing data from the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover the adhesive truth behind this unexpected correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, there's more to stick to than meets the eye!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a thorough analysis of GDP per capita in Canada and identified various determinants of economic growth in their study "Economic Development and Beyond." Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the labor market dynamics in Mississippi, examining factors influencing employment patterns in their work "Labor Force Trends in the Southern United States." These studies shed light on the economic landscape, but they did not specifically address the curious interplay between adhesive bonding machine operators and GDP per capita.
It's no surprise that the economic world often sticks to the conventional factors influencing growth, but our investigation opens the door to a more adhesive perspective. As we uncover the unexpected correlation between adhesive bonding and economic prosperity, we may find ourselves stuck on this intriguing phenomenon. Speaking of being stuck, did you hear about the adhesive that went to a party? It was the life of the tape!
Turning to the world of non-fiction literature, "The Adhesive Revolution: From Glue Sticks to Economic Sticks" by Bond and Stick (2017) provides insights into the role of adhesives in various industries. Furthermore, "Sticky Situations: Understanding Economic Relationships" by Glue and Gum (2019) offers a comprehensive exploration of unorthodox economic connections. While these works may not directly address our specific research question, they offer valuable perspectives on the adhesive world of economics.
Now, let's take a humorous detour into the realm of fiction that surprisingly aligns with our research topic. "The Adhesive Alchemist" by Elmer Strong is a tale of a wizard who discovers the magical properties of economic adhesion. Additionally, "The Bonding Chronicles" by Sticky McBinderson presents a riveting story of adhesive bonding machine operators navigating economic challenges in captivating fashion. These fictional works may not offer empirical evidence, but they certainly add an imaginative twist to our investigation.
Speaking of imaginative twists, did you hear the joke about the adhesive bonding machine operator? They always stick to their job no matter what!
In today's digital age, social media platforms have become hubs for intriguing insights. A tweet by @EconGeek123 stated, "Who knew that the number of adhesive bonding machine operators could hold the key to economic prosperity? #StickToSuccess." While this tweet may seem lighthearted, it reflects a growing awareness of the unconventional factors shaping economic landscapes. Another post by @AdhesiveAnalyst highlighted the overlooked role of adhesion in economic modeling, sparking discussions about the potential impact of adhesive bonding on GDP per capita.
These diverse sources, ranging from academic studies to fiction literature and social media discourse, collectively contribute to a multifaceted understanding of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. As we stick to the task of unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we must not lose sight of the adhesive humor and creativity that infuse our research journey. After all, what's an economic investigation without a few sticky puns along the way?
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2010 to 2022 revealed a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8009803, indicating that approximately 80% of the variability in the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi can be explained by the GDP per capita in Canada. Talk about sticking together!
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant, providing robust evidence of the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, the bond is indisputably strong.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the tight connection between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. The points on the plot form a clear upward trend, emphasizing the adhesive nature of this relationship. It's a bond that simply cannot be ignored!
This finding prompts us to reconsider the traditional factors influencing economic growth and labor dynamics. Perhaps there's more "sticking power" in the labor force than previously acknowledged, and adhesive bonding machine operators may play a more substantial role in economic development than initially presumed. It seems that sticky situations can be rather illuminating when it comes to understanding economic trends.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our results not only confirm the previous findings that GDP per capita in Canada is a crucial determinant of economic growth but also shed light on the surprising influence of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. The correlation coefficients and statistical significance presented in our study align with the existing literature on economic development and labor market dynamics. It appears that our research has managed to stick to the script of prior investigations while also introducing an unexpected twist – the adhesive bonding factor.
The adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi seem to have quite the knack for "sticking" to their jobs, and it turns out their labor force dynamics are more closely tied to economic prosperity than one might initially assume. The statistical significance of our results holds together like a well-crafted adhesive bond, emphasizing the substantive influence of this workforce factor. It seems that in the world of economics, some relationships are just meant to "stick" around!
As we revisit some of the lighthearted literature in our review, we must acknowledge that although the topic of adhesive bonding machine operators may initially raise eyebrows, our study has highlighted the tangible impact of their labor force activities on the economic landscape. In a sense, it's as if our research has "stuck" the landing on a traditionally overlooked aspect of labor market dynamics.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 not only visually depicts the strong correlation between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi but also serves as a reminder that sometimes the most unexpected relationships can form the strongest bonds. It's truly a testament to the adhesive nature of economics that even the most unassuming factors can end up wielding significant influence.
Ultimately, our investigation serves as a testament to the intricate and often surprising connections that underpin economic growth and labor dynamics. As we peel back the layers of economic analysis, we must remain open to the unforeseen influences that may "stick" out in shaping the economic landscape. After all, in the world of economic research, sometimes all it takes is a little "adhesive humor" to garnish an otherwise dry academic pursuit!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GDP per capita in Canada and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. By analyzing data from the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover the adhesive truth behind this unexpected correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, there's more to stick to than meets the eye!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
You may have heard the saying, "Behind every successful economy is a strong adhesive bonding machine operator," or maybe not. Nevertheless, in the world of economic research, we often come across unexpected connections and correlations that leave us scratching our heads and reaching for the nearest roll of duct tape. In this paper, we embark on a sticky investigation into the relationship between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi.
You might think this topic is a bit off the wall, but as economists, we are always looking for innovative and sometimes unconventional ways to understand and predict economic trends. After all, there’s nothing wrong with a little creativity, especially if it can bring some adhesion to our understanding of economic growth.
Speaking of adhesion, what do you call a group of adhesive bonding machine operators? The bond squad!
Now, let's address the sticky details of our study. We crunch the numbers, analyze the data, and apply the most robust statistical methods to investigate this seemingly peculiar relationship. Our aim is not just to add another layer of complexity to economic analysis but to uncover a bond that may have been overlooked in previous research.
Before we dive into the sticky details, let's take a moment to ponder the peculiarities of this connection. As we peel back the layers of economic data, we may find ourselves wondering how two seemingly unrelated factors could be so closely linked. But as they say, you can’t ignore the glue-stats!
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from 2010 to 2022 revealed a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8009803, indicating that approximately 80% of the variability in the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi can be explained by the GDP per capita in Canada. Talk about sticking together!
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant, providing robust evidence of the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, the bond is indisputably strong.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the tight connection between the GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. The points on the plot form a clear upward trend, emphasizing the adhesive nature of this relationship. It's a bond that simply cannot be ignored!
This finding prompts us to reconsider the traditional factors influencing economic growth and labor dynamics. Perhaps there's more "sticking power" in the labor force than previously acknowledged, and adhesive bonding machine operators may play a more substantial role in economic development than initially presumed. It seems that sticky situations can be rather illuminating when it comes to understanding economic trends.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between GDP per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi has revealed a surprisingly strong correlation. The adhesive truth behind these findings suggests that economic growth and the labor force in Mississippi are indeed bonded together in a manner that defies conventional economic wisdom. It appears that the performance of adhesive bonding machine operators serves as a sticky indicator of economic prosperity.
As we wrap up our study, it's clear that there's no escaping the adhesive nature of this connection. It seems that when it comes to the economic outlook, the trend is definitely "stuck" in the right direction. Speaking of trends, did you hear about the rise in demand for adhesive bonding machine operators? Looks like it's really "sticking" around!
Moreover, our findings highlight a significant aspect of economic development that warrants further attention. These results can serve as a valuable adhesive for policymakers and economists in understanding the labor dynamics that impact economic growth. It's crucial to recognize the influential role of adhesive bonding machine operators and their compelling connection to economic prosperity.
In light of these compelling findings, it's safe to say that we need not "stick" our noses back into this subject. The adhesive truth has been uncovered, and no further research in this area is warranted. As they say, we've "bonded" with the data, and the results are not going anywhere—much like a tightly secured adhesive bond!
In closing, let's remain open to the unexpected correlations that may arise in economic research. After all, sometimes the most adhesive connections lead to the most enlightening insights. Thank you for "sticking" with us through this study.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Economic Adherents and Industrial Mechanics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Economic Adhesion Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Canada and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi. By analyzing data from the World Bank and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover the adhesive truth behind this unexpected correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8949750 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. It seems that when it comes to economic growth and adhesive bonding, there's more to stick to than meets the eye!
ChatGPT:
GDP per capita, adhesive bonding machine operators, Canada GDP, Mississippi adhesive bonding, World Bank data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation between GDP and adhesive bonding, economic growth correlation, adhesive bonding machine operators statistics, adhesive bonding industry correlation with GDP
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GDP per capita in CanadaSource: World Bank
See what else correlates with GDP per capita in Canada
The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of adhesive bonding machine operators and tenders in Mississippi
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8009803 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GDP per capita in Canada) over the 13 years from 2010 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-5. 0.0000359348260860631200000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.0036% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 27,828 random variables You don't actually need 27 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.68, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
GDP per capita in Canada (US Dollars) | 47465 | 51791 | 52409 | 51911 | 50956 | 43596.1 | 42315.6 | 45129.4 | 46548.6 | 46328.7 | 43258.3 | 51987.9 | 54966 |
The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi (Laborers) | 600 | 720 | 710 | 640 | 490 | 440 | 350 | 400 | 530 | 420 | 390 | 770 | 730 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([47465,51791,52409,51911,50956,43596.1,42315.6,45129.4,46548.6,46328.7,43258.3,51987.9,54966,])
array_2 = np.array([600,720,710,640,490,440,350,400,530,420,390,770,730,])
array_1_name = "GDP per capita in Canada"
array_2_name = "The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GDP per capita in Canada
- Line chart for only The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Mississippi
- The spurious research paper: Stuck on Growth: The Bond Between GDP Per Capita and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators
Your rating is much appreciated!
Correlation ID: 1194 · Black Variable ID: 48 · Red Variable ID: 18274