about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,192 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the second variable is xkcd comics published about philosophy.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of liberal arts graduates dwindled, there were fewer people left to ponder the deep, existential questions posed in xkcd comics. This led to a philosophical drought in the xkcd creative process, ultimately resulting in a decrease in such thought-provoking content.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a surreal room with vibrant, swirling colors that emanate from the center. On the left side, a towering stack of xkcd comic books stands, each exuding a whimsical glow. On the right, a pile of graduation caps adorned with "Bachelor of Liberal Arts" tassels sits, gradually diminishing. The room is filled with a sense of whimsy and introspection as the comics and graduation caps dwindle in unison, symbolizing a shifting landscape of philosophical exploration and academic achievement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Bachelor's degrees in Liberal arts are taking a toll on the world of philosophical xkcd comics! As the number of liberal arts degrees plummet, so too does the publication of xkcd comics delving into the world of philosophy. It seems that as the well of liberal arts knowledge dries up, so too does the inspiration for comedic musings on Plato and Socrates. Could this be the end of philosophical puns as we know it? Only time will tell!". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Psychedelic Symbolism Parallax art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: Psychadelic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "Bachelor's degrees in Liberal arts are taking a toll on the world of philosophical xkcd comics! As the number of liberal arts degrees plummet, so too does the publication of xkcd comics delving into the world of philosophy. It seems that as the well of liberal arts knowledge dries up, so too does the inspiration for comedic musings on Plato and Socrates. Could this be the end of philosophical puns as we know it? Only time will tell!"
ChatGPT: Imagine a room with a stack of colorful xkcd comic books on one side and a pile of graduation caps with a "Bachelor of Liberal Arts" tassel on the other side. As the graduation caps decrease in number, the pile of xkcd comics dwindles as well. The once vibrant and overflowing pile of comics is slowly diminishing, reflecting the decline in philosophical xkcd comics.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Psychadelic ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a room with a stack of colorful xkcd comic books on one side and a pile of graduation caps with a "Bachelor of Liberal Arts" tassel on the other side. As the graduation caps decrease in number, the pile of xkcd comics dwindles as well. The once vibrant and overflowing pile of comics is slowly diminishing, reflecting the decline in philosophical xkcd comics. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a surreal room with vibrant, swirling colors that emanate from the center. On the left side, a towering stack of xkcd comic books stands, each exuding a whimsical glow. On the right, a pile of graduation caps adorned with "Bachelor of Liberal Arts" tassels sits, gradually diminishing. The room is filled with a sense of whimsy and introspection as the comics and graduation caps dwindle in unison, symbolizing a shifting landscape of philosophical exploration and academic achievement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts caused xkcd comics published about philosophy to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Humor Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and xkcd comics published about philosophy. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical analysis investigating the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and employing advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research aimed to unravel this tantalizing connection, weaving together the worlds of academia and humor. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 for the timeframe spanning from 2012 to 2021.

Our study sheds light on the intriguing interplay between educational pursuits and satirical reflections, illuminating the possibility of a rhythmic pattern between the two domains. It seems that proponents of Liberal arts are not only well-versed in the humanities but also appreciate the witty musings of xkcd about philosophy. It's fair to say that this correlation adds a new spin to the age-old question of whether humor has a degree in philosophy or if it's just a comic twist of fate. A relevant dad joke to top it off: What did the statistics professor say about xkcd comics? They're a-plotting with humor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and xkcd comics published about philosophy. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical analysis investigating the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and employing advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research aimed to unravel this tantalizing connection, weaving together the worlds of academia and humor. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 for the timeframe spanning from 2012 to 2021.

Our study sheds light on the intriguing interplay between educational pursuits and satirical reflections, illuminating the possibility of a rhythmic pattern between the two domains. It seems that proponents of Liberal arts are not only well-versed in the humanities but also appreciate the witty musings of xkcd about philosophy. It's fair to say that this correlation adds a new spin to the age-old question of whether humor has a degree in philosophy or if it's just a comic twist of fate. A relevant dad joke to top it off: What did the statistics professor say about xkcd comics? They're a-plotting with humor!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of academia and humor is a realm where statistical analyses are rarely conducted, yet the possibility of uncovering some truly intriguing connections can't be dismissed. Just as we wouldn't ignore a correlation coefficient that's as strong as the gravitational pull of a black hole, it would be remiss of us not to explore the potential relationship between Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's like examining the statistical significance of a pun in an economist's joke – the potential for a good laugh is unmistakably present.

As we dive into this ocean of data and humor, it's important to note that our aim is not simply to tickle the funny bone of statistical analysts, but to unravel an association that may shed light on the cultural inclinations of Liberal arts enthusiasts and philosophical comic enthusiasts alike. It's akin to examining the a-priori beliefs of Bayesian statisticians – we have a hunch, but we need the numbers to back it up. Speaking of hunches, did you hear about the statistician who thought he had a good joke about degrees of freedom? Turns out it was just a t-distribution.

The utilization of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the application of advanced AI analysis to dissect the array of xkcd comics about philosophy form the backbone of our methodology. Just like a good cup of coffee, we aim to blend these ingredients together and extract a comprehensive understanding of the brew that is the relationship between education and comic merriment. It's almost as if we're crafting a statistical latte – it may be an acquired taste, but once you're hooked, there's no turning back. A relevant dad joke to add a dash of humor: Why don't statisticians trust artificial intelligence to analyze xkcd comics? Because it might be prone to making bad puns instead of good analysis!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and xkcd comics published about philosophy. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical analysis investigating the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and employing advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research aimed to unravel this tantalizing connection, weaving together the worlds of academia and humor. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 for the timeframe spanning from 2012 to 2021.

Our study sheds light on the intriguing interplay between educational pursuits and satirical reflections, illuminating the possibility of a rhythmic pattern between the two domains. It seems that proponents of Liberal arts are not only well-versed in the humanities but also appreciate the witty musings of xkcd about philosophy. It's fair to say that this correlation adds a new spin to the age-old question of whether humor has a degree in philosophy or if it's just a comic twist of fate. A relevant dad joke to top it off: What did the statistics professor say about xkcd comics? They're a-plotting with humor!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and humor is a realm where statistical analyses are rarely conducted, yet the possibility of uncovering some truly intriguing connections can't be dismissed. Just as we wouldn't ignore a correlation coefficient that's as strong as the gravitational pull of a black hole, it would be remiss of us not to explore the potential relationship between Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's like examining the statistical significance of a pun in an economist's joke – the potential for a good laugh is unmistakably present.
As we dive into this ocean of data and humor, it's important to note that our aim is not simply to tickle the funny bone of statistical analysts, but to unravel an association that may shed light on the cultural inclinations of Liberal arts enthusiasts and philosophical comic enthusiasts alike. It's akin to examining the a-priori beliefs of Bayesian statisticians – we have a hunch, but we need the numbers to back it up. Speaking of hunches, did you hear about the statistician who thought he had a good joke about degrees of freedom? Turns out it was just a t-distribution.
The utilization of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the application of advanced AI analysis to dissect the array of xkcd comics about philosophy form the backbone of our methodology. Just like a good cup of coffee, we aim to blend these ingredients together and extract a comprehensive understanding of the brew that is the relationship between education and comic merriment. It's almost as if we're crafting a statistical latte – it may be an acquired taste, but once you're hooked, there's no turning back. A relevant dad joke to add a dash of humor: Why don't statisticians trust artificial intelligence to analyze xkcd comics? Because it might be prone to making bad puns instead of good analysis!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) explored the trends in Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and their implications on societal attitudes towards philosophy-related humor. Their findings highlighted a gradual increase in the number of liberal arts graduates over the past decade, coinciding with a surge in philosophical musings within the realm of popular humor, including webcomics. This juxtaposition of intellectual pursuits and comedic reflections has piqued the interest of researchers and enthusiasts alike. It's like a statistical regression – we're trying to predict the punchline before it even gets delivered.

Furthermore, Jones and Smith (2018) delved into the intricacies of humor appreciation among holders of humanities degrees and uncovered a proclivity towards intellectual wit, particularly with regards to philosophical themes. This aligns with the notion that those immersed in the realm of Liberal arts have an affinity for thought-provoking humor, a notion as intriguing as the concept of an infinite regress.

Turning to the literature on webcomics, "What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions" by Randall Munroe (2014) offers a treasure trove of philosophical inquiries presented in a humorous fashion, resonating with the themes often found in xkcd comics. In a similar vein, "The Philosophy of The Simpsons: D'oh!" by William Irwin, Mark T. Conard, and Aeon J. Skoble (2001) provides a philosophical analysis of the iconic animated series, demonstrating the deep connections between popular culture and philosophical exploration. It seems there's a rich tradition of combing humor and philosophy, much like the virtuous cycle of peer review and revisions.

In the realm of board games, "The Settlers of Catan" involves strategic decision-making and negotiation, akin to the intellectual engagement and discourse prevalent in Liberal arts education. Not to mention, engaging in the pursuit of resources and development on the island of Catan has its philosophical implications, much like pondering the metaphorical island of Socrates' teachings. And "Betrayal at House on the Hill" revolves around unexpected and sometimes comical plot twists, analogous to the whimsical yet thought-provoking nature of philosophical comics. It's as if humor and philosophy are engaged in an epic roll of the dice, aiming to uncover the profound truth hidden in the hilarity of xkcd's philosophical musings.

Now, doesn't this research make you want to embark on a witty journey exploring the intersection of Liberal arts and philosophical webcomics? It's like trying to graph a function and finding the plot twists along the y-axis – unexpected yet utterly delightful.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and xkcd comics published about philosophy. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical analysis investigating the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and employing advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research aimed to unravel this tantalizing connection, weaving together the worlds of academia and humor. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 for the timeframe spanning from 2012 to 2021.

Our study sheds light on the intriguing interplay between educational pursuits and satirical reflections, illuminating the possibility of a rhythmic pattern between the two domains. It seems that proponents of Liberal arts are not only well-versed in the humanities but also appreciate the witty musings of xkcd about philosophy. It's fair to say that this correlation adds a new spin to the age-old question of whether humor has a degree in philosophy or if it's just a comic twist of fate. A relevant dad joke to top it off: What did the statistics professor say about xkcd comics? They're a-plotting with humor!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and humor is a realm where statistical analyses are rarely conducted, yet the possibility of uncovering some truly intriguing connections can't be dismissed. Just as we wouldn't ignore a correlation coefficient that's as strong as the gravitational pull of a black hole, it would be remiss of us not to explore the potential relationship between Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's like examining the statistical significance of a pun in an economist's joke – the potential for a good laugh is unmistakably present.
As we dive into this ocean of data and humor, it's important to note that our aim is not simply to tickle the funny bone of statistical analysts, but to unravel an association that may shed light on the cultural inclinations of Liberal arts enthusiasts and philosophical comic enthusiasts alike. It's akin to examining the a-priori beliefs of Bayesian statisticians – we have a hunch, but we need the numbers to back it up. Speaking of hunches, did you hear about the statistician who thought he had a good joke about degrees of freedom? Turns out it was just a t-distribution.
The utilization of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the application of advanced AI analysis to dissect the array of xkcd comics about philosophy form the backbone of our methodology. Just like a good cup of coffee, we aim to blend these ingredients together and extract a comprehensive understanding of the brew that is the relationship between education and comic merriment. It's almost as if we're crafting a statistical latte – it may be an acquired taste, but once you're hooked, there's no turning back. A relevant dad joke to add a dash of humor: Why don't statisticians trust artificial intelligence to analyze xkcd comics? Because it might be prone to making bad puns instead of good analysis!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To pursue this comedic yet enlightening investigation, we concocted a methodology as intricate and entertaining as a game of Sudoku played with puns. First, we collected data on the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts disciplines including but not limited to philosophy, literature, and history from the National Center for Education Statistics. Our team navigated the academic seas of data like a band of scholarly pirates, seeking out the treasure trove of educational statistics.

Once we had charted the course of Liberal arts degrees, we turned our gaze to the realm of xkcd comics about philosophy, employing advanced AI analysis to identify and categorize these timeless gems of humor and reflection. Our AI analysis delved deep into the digital archives, sifting through the pixels of wit and wisdom with the precision of an eagle-eyed statistical analyst in search of a rare p-value.

With the data in hand, we employed a convoluted yet captivating statistical model, which combined a hybrid of linear and non-linear regression techniques. This model danced through the data points like a whimsical mathematician pondering the meaning of life, gracefully balancing the weight of Liberal arts degrees with the levity of philosophical musings in xkcd comics. The algorithmic ballet of statistical analysis unfolded like a well-choreographed comedy act, weaving the statistical significance of the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts with the frequency of xkcd comics about philosophy, ultimately unearthing the hidden patterns within.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations, simulating virtual scenarios more diverse and entertaining than a stand-up comedy show featuring Bayesian statisticians. This allowed us to scrutinize the stability of our results under a myriad of hypothetical comedic and academic circumstances, much like a joke's resilience under various audiences.

A relevant dad joke just to keep the humor flowing: Did you hear about the statistician who used a Monte Carlo simulation to decide which xkcd comics to analyze first? He took a random walk through the comics, and the results were hilarious, with a statistical significance of 0.05 or less!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and xkcd comics published about philosophy. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9315918, r-squared of 0.8678632, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical analysis investigating the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and employing advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research aimed to unravel this tantalizing connection, weaving together the worlds of academia and humor. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 for the timeframe spanning from 2012 to 2021.

Our study sheds light on the intriguing interplay between educational pursuits and satirical reflections, illuminating the possibility of a rhythmic pattern between the two domains. It seems that proponents of Liberal arts are not only well-versed in the humanities but also appreciate the witty musings of xkcd about philosophy. It's fair to say that this correlation adds a new spin to the age-old question of whether humor has a degree in philosophy or if it's just a comic twist of fate. A relevant dad joke to top it off: What did the statistics professor say about xkcd comics? They're a-plotting with humor!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of academia and humor is a realm where statistical analyses are rarely conducted, yet the possibility of uncovering some truly intriguing connections can't be dismissed. Just as we wouldn't ignore a correlation coefficient that's as strong as the gravitational pull of a black hole, it would be remiss of us not to explore the potential relationship between Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's like examining the statistical significance of a pun in an economist's joke – the potential for a good laugh is unmistakably present.
As we dive into this ocean of data and humor, it's important to note that our aim is not simply to tickle the funny bone of statistical analysts, but to unravel an association that may shed light on the cultural inclinations of Liberal arts enthusiasts and philosophical comic enthusiasts alike. It's akin to examining the a-priori beliefs of Bayesian statisticians – we have a hunch, but we need the numbers to back it up. Speaking of hunches, did you hear about the statistician who thought he had a good joke about degrees of freedom? Turns out it was just a t-distribution.
The utilization of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the application of advanced AI analysis to dissect the array of xkcd comics about philosophy form the backbone of our methodology. Just like a good cup of coffee, we aim to blend these ingredients together and extract a comprehensive understanding of the brew that is the relationship between education and comic merriment. It's almost as if we're crafting a statistical latte – it may be an acquired taste, but once you're hooked, there's no turning back. A relevant dad joke to add a dash of humor: Why don't statisticians trust artificial intelligence to analyze xkcd comics? Because it might be prone to making bad puns instead of good analysis!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy for the period from 2012 to 2021 revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 indicates a remarkably robust relationship between these seemingly disparate realms. It appears that not only do Liberal arts enthusiasts revel in the artistic expression of human thought, but they also appreciate the humorous musings of xkcd comics about philosophy. This finding provides a new dimension to the age-old question of whether education and humor can coexist in statistical harmony. Speaking of statistical harmony, did you hear about the statistician who worked with xkcd comics? He found a correlation so strong, it was like music to his ears!

The r-squared value of 0.8678632 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of the variability in the frequency of xkcd comics about philosophy that can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the high level of significance, making it clear that this relationship is not likely to be a mere statistical fluke. In fact, it's as rare as finding a philosopher who doesn't ponder the meaning of life itself. Our research has shed light on this unexpected association, presenting a statistical plot twist that has left us marveling at the harmonious dance of education and humor.

To further illustrate the strength of this relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) in which each data point represents a different year within the specified timeframe. The figure portrays a distinct clustering of data points, affirming the notable correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's like witnessing the perfect symbiosis between two unlikely statistical partners, akin to the unexpectedly seamless fusion of two contrasting musical genres. In fact, when it comes to statistical relationships as intriguing as this one, it's clear that the humor in the xkcd comics isn't the only thing that's off the charts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and xkcd comics published about philosophy. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical analysis investigating the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and employing advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research aimed to unravel this tantalizing connection, weaving together the worlds of academia and humor. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 for the timeframe spanning from 2012 to 2021.

Our study sheds light on the intriguing interplay between educational pursuits and satirical reflections, illuminating the possibility of a rhythmic pattern between the two domains. It seems that proponents of Liberal arts are not only well-versed in the humanities but also appreciate the witty musings of xkcd about philosophy. It's fair to say that this correlation adds a new spin to the age-old question of whether humor has a degree in philosophy or if it's just a comic twist of fate. A relevant dad joke to top it off: What did the statistics professor say about xkcd comics? They're a-plotting with humor!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) explored the trends in Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and their implications on societal attitudes towards philosophy-related humor. Their findings highlighted a gradual increase in the number of liberal arts graduates over the past decade, coinciding with a surge in philosophical musings within the realm of popular humor, including webcomics. This juxtaposition of intellectual pursuits and comedic reflections has piqued the interest of researchers and enthusiasts alike. It's like a statistical regression – we're trying to predict the punchline before it even gets delivered.
Furthermore, Jones and Smith (2018) delved into the intricacies of humor appreciation among holders of humanities degrees and uncovered a proclivity towards intellectual wit, particularly with regards to philosophical themes. This aligns with the notion that those immersed in the realm of Liberal arts have an affinity for thought-provoking humor, a notion as intriguing as the concept of an infinite regress.
Turning to the literature on webcomics, "What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions" by Randall Munroe (2014) offers a treasure trove of philosophical inquiries presented in a humorous fashion, resonating with the themes often found in xkcd comics. In a similar vein, "The Philosophy of The Simpsons: D'oh!" by William Irwin, Mark T. Conard, and Aeon J. Skoble (2001) provides a philosophical analysis of the iconic animated series, demonstrating the deep connections between popular culture and philosophical exploration. It seems there's a rich tradition of combing humor and philosophy, much like the virtuous cycle of peer review and revisions.
In the realm of board games, "The Settlers of Catan" involves strategic decision-making and negotiation, akin to the intellectual engagement and discourse prevalent in Liberal arts education. Not to mention, engaging in the pursuit of resources and development on the island of Catan has its philosophical implications, much like pondering the metaphorical island of Socrates' teachings. And "Betrayal at House on the Hill" revolves around unexpected and sometimes comical plot twists, analogous to the whimsical yet thought-provoking nature of philosophical comics. It's as if humor and philosophy are engaged in an epic roll of the dice, aiming to uncover the profound truth hidden in the hilarity of xkcd's philosophical musings.
Now, doesn't this research make you want to embark on a witty journey exploring the intersection of Liberal arts and philosophical webcomics? It's like trying to graph a function and finding the plot twists along the y-axis – unexpected yet utterly delightful.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy for the period from 2012 to 2021 revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 indicates a remarkably robust relationship between these seemingly disparate realms. It appears that not only do Liberal arts enthusiasts revel in the artistic expression of human thought, but they also appreciate the humorous musings of xkcd comics about philosophy. This finding provides a new dimension to the age-old question of whether education and humor can coexist in statistical harmony. Speaking of statistical harmony, did you hear about the statistician who worked with xkcd comics? He found a correlation so strong, it was like music to his ears!
The r-squared value of 0.8678632 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of the variability in the frequency of xkcd comics about philosophy that can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the high level of significance, making it clear that this relationship is not likely to be a mere statistical fluke. In fact, it's as rare as finding a philosopher who doesn't ponder the meaning of life itself. Our research has shed light on this unexpected association, presenting a statistical plot twist that has left us marveling at the harmonious dance of education and humor.
To further illustrate the strength of this relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) in which each data point represents a different year within the specified timeframe. The figure portrays a distinct clustering of data points, affirming the notable correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's like witnessing the perfect symbiosis between two unlikely statistical partners, akin to the unexpectedly seamless fusion of two contrasting musical genres. In fact, when it comes to statistical relationships as intriguing as this one, it's clear that the humor in the xkcd comics isn't the only thing that's off the charts.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The compelling results of our study have brought forth a tantalizing confluence of academia and humor, as revealed by the strong correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. Our findings not only align with prior research but also add a new layer of understanding to the interplay of intellectual pursuits and comedic reflections.

In line with the work of Smith and Doe (2015), we have observed a discernible trend wherein the increase in liberal arts graduates corresponds to a surge in philosophical musings within popular humor, particularly in the realm of webcomics. This correlation invokes an interesting thought experiment: Are liberal arts graduates drawn to philosophical humor as a means of reconciling the inherent complexities of their academic pursuits, or is their appreciation for such humor a reflection of an inherent intellectual wit? It's like trying to solve a philosophical equation – we're posed with multiple variables that intertwine in ways that may defy straightforward interpretation.

Furthermore, the findings of Jones and Smith (2018) regarding the proclivity of holders of humanities degrees towards intellectual humor, especially with philosophical themes, resonate with our results. It seems that the marriage of humor and philosophy is not just a statistical anomaly but a deeply ingrained facet of intellectual engagement, much like the unexpected yet thoroughly enjoyable nature of a well-timed dad joke.

The statistically significant relationship elucidated in our study serves as a profound revelation, much like the sudden realization of a pun's double meaning. Our results not only support the notion that liberal arts enthusiasts have an affinity for philosophical jokes, but they also prompt further inquiries into the underlying mechanisms driving this remarkable association. It's as if we've stumbled upon a hidden punchline within the realm of academic pursuits, offering a fresh perspective on the perennial question of whether philosophy can be funny, or perhaps, whether humor can be philosophical.

In the grand tradition of dad jokes, we've unveiled a statistical correlation that's not only statistically significant but also remarkably amusing. Just like a well-crafted pun, our findings highlight the delightful harmony between the worlds of liberal arts and philosophical humor, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected twists and turns that statistical analysis can uncover.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and xkcd comics published about philosophy. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical analysis investigating the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and employing advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research aimed to unravel this tantalizing connection, weaving together the worlds of academia and humor. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 for the timeframe spanning from 2012 to 2021.

Our study sheds light on the intriguing interplay between educational pursuits and satirical reflections, illuminating the possibility of a rhythmic pattern between the two domains. It seems that proponents of Liberal arts are not only well-versed in the humanities but also appreciate the witty musings of xkcd about philosophy. It's fair to say that this correlation adds a new spin to the age-old question of whether humor has a degree in philosophy or if it's just a comic twist of fate. A relevant dad joke to top it off: What did the statistics professor say about xkcd comics? They're a-plotting with humor!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and humor is a realm where statistical analyses are rarely conducted, yet the possibility of uncovering some truly intriguing connections can't be dismissed. Just as we wouldn't ignore a correlation coefficient that's as strong as the gravitational pull of a black hole, it would be remiss of us not to explore the potential relationship between Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's like examining the statistical significance of a pun in an economist's joke – the potential for a good laugh is unmistakably present.
As we dive into this ocean of data and humor, it's important to note that our aim is not simply to tickle the funny bone of statistical analysts, but to unravel an association that may shed light on the cultural inclinations of Liberal arts enthusiasts and philosophical comic enthusiasts alike. It's akin to examining the a-priori beliefs of Bayesian statisticians – we have a hunch, but we need the numbers to back it up. Speaking of hunches, did you hear about the statistician who thought he had a good joke about degrees of freedom? Turns out it was just a t-distribution.
The utilization of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the application of advanced AI analysis to dissect the array of xkcd comics about philosophy form the backbone of our methodology. Just like a good cup of coffee, we aim to blend these ingredients together and extract a comprehensive understanding of the brew that is the relationship between education and comic merriment. It's almost as if we're crafting a statistical latte – it may be an acquired taste, but once you're hooked, there's no turning back. A relevant dad joke to add a dash of humor: Why don't statisticians trust artificial intelligence to analyze xkcd comics? Because it might be prone to making bad puns instead of good analysis!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy for the period from 2012 to 2021 revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 indicates a remarkably robust relationship between these seemingly disparate realms. It appears that not only do Liberal arts enthusiasts revel in the artistic expression of human thought, but they also appreciate the humorous musings of xkcd comics about philosophy. This finding provides a new dimension to the age-old question of whether education and humor can coexist in statistical harmony. Speaking of statistical harmony, did you hear about the statistician who worked with xkcd comics? He found a correlation so strong, it was like music to his ears!
The r-squared value of 0.8678632 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of the variability in the frequency of xkcd comics about philosophy that can be explained by the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the high level of significance, making it clear that this relationship is not likely to be a mere statistical fluke. In fact, it's as rare as finding a philosopher who doesn't ponder the meaning of life itself. Our research has shed light on this unexpected association, presenting a statistical plot twist that has left us marveling at the harmonious dance of education and humor.
To further illustrate the strength of this relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) in which each data point represents a different year within the specified timeframe. The figure portrays a distinct clustering of data points, affirming the notable correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's like witnessing the perfect symbiosis between two unlikely statistical partners, akin to the unexpectedly seamless fusion of two contrasting musical genres. In fact, when it comes to statistical relationships as intriguing as this one, it's clear that the humor in the xkcd comics isn't the only thing that's off the charts.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a compelling and statistically significant relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and the impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 have illuminated a captivating intertwining of these seemingly disparate domains. It's as if statistical analysis has uncovered a hidden punchline in the academic pursuit of Liberal arts, demonstrating that humor and education can indeed march to the beat of the same statistical drum. Speaking of statistical drumbeats, did you hear about the statistician who went to a philosophy symposium? He found it quite thought-provoking, but the real enlightenment came when he started analyzing xkcd comics about philosophy!

The investigation has not only expanded our understanding of the cultural inclinations of Liberal arts enthusiasts and philosophical comic aficionados but has also added a new layer of complexity to the age-old question of the symbiotic relationship between education and humor. It's like discovering a statistical Easter egg in the complex web of human interests, reminding us that even the most unexpected connections can be measured, analyzed, and appreciated. A relevant dad joke to infuse a bit of levity: Why did the statistician bring a ladder to the xkcd comic convention? To ensure he had a high degree of observation!

We assert that no further research is warranted in this area, as our study has convincingly demonstrated the robust nature of the relationship between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. It's as clear as a statistical bell curve – the correlation speaks for itself!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Humor Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Humor Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Link Between Liberal Arts Lovers and xkcd Philosophical Wits: A Statistical Rhyme with an abstract of This paper presents a statistical analysis investigating the potential relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in the field of Liberal arts and the frequency of xkcd comics published about philosophy. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and employing advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics, our research aimed to unravel this tantalizing connection, weaving together the worlds of academia and humor. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9315918 and an impressively low p-value of less than 0.01 for the timeframe spanning from 2012 to 2021.
Our study sheds light on the intriguing interplay between educational pursuits and satirical reflections, illuminating the possibility of a rhythmic pattern between the two domains. It seems that proponents of Liberal arts are not only well-versed in the humanities but also appreciate the witty musings of xkcd about philosophy. It's fair to say that this correlation adds a new spin to the age-old question of whether humor has a degree in philosophy or if it's just a comic twist of fate. A relevant dad joke to top it off: What did the statistics professor say about xkcd comics? They're a-plotting with humor!

ChatGPT:

Liberal arts, Bachelor's degrees, National Center for Education Statistics, xkcd comics, philosophy, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, academia, humor, educational pursuits

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts
Detailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Liberal arts and sciences, general studies, and humanities
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts

xkcd comics published about philosophy
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about philosophy
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about philosophy

Correlation r = 0.9315918 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8678632 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about philosophy) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.8E-5. 0.0000881670878605952000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.0088% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,342 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts (Degrees awarded)46961467904528143649436694410344262442224292241909
xkcd comics published about philosophy (xkcd comics)81263355411




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([46961,46790,45281,43649,43669,44103,44262,44222,42922,41909,])
array_2 = np.array([8,12,6,3,3,5,5,4,1,1,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in Liberal arts"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about philosophy"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1192 · Black Variable ID: 1281 · Red Variable ID: 20027
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0