NOTICE: This correlation is inactive
The correlation is not active in any lists.
This page remains only to prevent link rot.
Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of daily newspapers in the United States rose, more hot air was generated during political debates, contributing to stronger winds in Madagascar, ultimately leading to an increase in wind power generated there. Looks like the power of the press has a global reach!
Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling newsstand in the heart of an American city, surrounded by towering skyscrapers. The sky is a rich, deep blue with swirls of puffy clouds, and the atmosphere is alive with the energy of a bustling metropolis. At the newsstand, a colorful array of newspapers is stacked high, each adorned with bold headlines and vibrant images. As more papers are printed, a gust of wind sweeps through the scene, lifting the newspapers into the air and sending them on a whimsical journey across the ocean. The image transitions to the island of Madagascar, where a joyful community has gathered around to read and laugh at the comics section of the newspapers, filled with puns and jokes about wind. In the midst of their merriment, the group is inspired by the lighthearted coverage to discuss and plan wind power projects. This newfound enthusiasm is symbolized by a flurry of wind turbine models and diagrams being passed around, illustrating their ambitious plans for sustainable energy. In the background, the silhouette of majestic wind turbines can be seen spinning gracefully in the gentle island breeze, reflecting the community's fervent interest and investment in wind power technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Increased Count of daily newspapers in the United States caused Wind power generated in Madagascar to also increase due to the spreading of wind-related puns and jokes in the newspaper comics sections. This led to a surge in interest and investment in wind power technology, including a strong gust of support for wind farms in Madagascar. As the newspapers blew into Madagascar, so did the inspiration to harness the power of wind, creating a whirlwind of progress in the renewable energy sector.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Hyper-realistic Surrealism Psychedelic Macabre
ChatGPT: Surrealism
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Increased Count of daily newspapers in the United States caused Wind power generated in Madagascar to also increase due to the spreading of wind-related puns and jokes in the newspaper comics sections. This led to a surge in interest and investment in wind power technology, including a strong gust of support for wind farms in Madagascar. As the newspapers blew into Madagascar, so did the inspiration to harness the power of wind, creating a whirlwind of progress in the renewable energy sector.
ChatGPT: Picture this: a bustling newsstand in the United States with stacks of newspapers piled high. As more and more papers are printed, they are swept away by a gust of wind, traveling across the ocean to Madagascar. On the island, people are gathered around, laughing and reading the comics section of the newspapers, filled with puns and jokes about wind. Inspired by the lighthearted coverage, the community begins discussing and planning wind power projects, symbolized by a flurry of wind turbine models and diagrams being passed around. In the background, you can see the silhouette of wind turbines spinning in the breeze, reflecting the newfound interest and investment in wind power technology.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Surrealism ] and depicting this scene: Picture this: a bustling newsstand in the United States with stacks of newspapers piled high. As more and more papers are printed, they are swept away by a gust of wind, traveling across the ocean to Madagascar. On the island, people are gathered around, laughing and reading the comics section of the newspapers, filled with puns and jokes about wind. Inspired by the lighthearted coverage, the community begins discussing and planning wind power projects, symbolized by a flurry of wind turbine models and diagrams being passed around. In the background, you can see the silhouette of wind turbines spinning in the breeze, reflecting the newfound interest and investment in wind power technology. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling newsstand in the heart of an American city, surrounded by towering skyscrapers. The sky is a rich, deep blue with swirls of puffy clouds, and the atmosphere is alive with the energy of a bustling metropolis. At the newsstand, a colorful array of newspapers is stacked high, each adorned with bold headlines and vibrant images. As more papers are printed, a gust of wind sweeps through the scene, lifting the newspapers into the air and sending them on a whimsical journey across the ocean. The image transitions to the island of Madagascar, where a joyful community has gathered around to read and laugh at the comics section of the newspapers, filled with puns and jokes about wind. In the midst of their merriment, the group is inspired by the lighthearted coverage to discuss and plan wind power projects. This newfound enthusiasm is symbolized by a flurry of wind turbine models and diagrams being passed around, illustrating their ambitious plans for sustainable energy. In the background, the silhouette of majestic wind turbines can be seen spinning gracefully in the gentle island breeze, reflecting the community's fervent interest and investment in wind power technology.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Count of daily newspapers in the United States caused Wind power generated in Madagascar to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
![]() |
Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar Journal of News and Wind Power Relations Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Count of daily newspapers in the United States and Wind power generated in Madagascar. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from Statista and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2018.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Delving into the vast datasets from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period of 2010 to 2018. We took a whirlwind journey through the statistical wind currents to demystify this connection, which may provide gusts of insight for future research in sustainable energy and media influence. This study blows away the notion that these two seemingly disparate factors are like ships passing in the night, and it may just be the breath of fresh air that the academic community needs.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Count of daily newspapers in the United States and Wind power generated in Madagascar. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Delving into the vast datasets from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period of 2010 to 2018. We took a whirlwind journey through the statistical wind currents to demystify this connection, which may provide gusts of insight for future research in sustainable energy and media influence. This study blows away the notion that these two seemingly disparate factors are like ships passing in the night, and it may just be the breath of fresh air that the academic community needs.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly disparate phenomena has long intrigued researchers across various fields. From the famed connection between ice cream consumption and shark attacks to the link between chocolate consumption and Nobel Prize winners, the realm of unexpected correlations never fails to captivate the curious minds of academia. In this study, we embark on an investigation that might just blow your mind, as we delve into the curious relationship between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar.
As we navigate through this research, it is important to emphasize the significance of investigating obscure connections, as they often lead to serendipitous discoveries that challenge conventional wisdom. While it might appear as a mere flight of fancy to some, our exploration of this unconventional relationship holds the potential to provide valuable insights into the realms of sustainable energy and media impact.
The world of statistics is like a windy day at the beach – relentless and occasionally unpredictable. Our quest is akin to attempting to capture the swirling patterns of wind currents, hoping to uncover the hidden forces that guide these observable phenomena. Through the rigorous analysis of extensive datasets, we set out to untangle the web of interconnected variables and unearth the winds of significance that may dictate the relationship between daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generation in Madagascar.
In this paper, we navigate through the valleys and peaks of statistical analysis to shed light on an unlikely union between the daily dissemination of news and the breezy production of wind power. As we unravel this association, we aim to challenge conventional assumptions and provide a gust of fresh perspectives to the academic community. By addressing this unexpected connection, we hope to inject a breath of fresh air into the scholarly discourse, proving that sometimes, the most astonishing discoveries are made by following the most unlikely breezes.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Count of daily newspapers in the United States and Wind power generated in Madagascar. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Delving into the vast datasets from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period of 2010 to 2018. We took a whirlwind journey through the statistical wind currents to demystify this connection, which may provide gusts of insight for future research in sustainable energy and media influence. This study blows away the notion that these two seemingly disparate factors are like ships passing in the night, and it may just be the breath of fresh air that the academic community needs.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly disparate phenomena has long intrigued researchers across various fields. From the famed connection between ice cream consumption and shark attacks to the link between chocolate consumption and Nobel Prize winners, the realm of unexpected correlations never fails to captivate the curious minds of academia. In this study, we embark on an investigation that might just blow your mind, as we delve into the curious relationship between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar.
As we navigate through this research, it is important to emphasize the significance of investigating obscure connections, as they often lead to serendipitous discoveries that challenge conventional wisdom. While it might appear as a mere flight of fancy to some, our exploration of this unconventional relationship holds the potential to provide valuable insights into the realms of sustainable energy and media impact.
The world of statistics is like a windy day at the beach – relentless and occasionally unpredictable. Our quest is akin to attempting to capture the swirling patterns of wind currents, hoping to uncover the hidden forces that guide these observable phenomena. Through the rigorous analysis of extensive datasets, we set out to untangle the web of interconnected variables and unearth the winds of significance that may dictate the relationship between daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generation in Madagascar.
In this paper, we navigate through the valleys and peaks of statistical analysis to shed light on an unlikely union between the daily dissemination of news and the breezy production of wind power. As we unravel this association, we aim to challenge conventional assumptions and provide a gust of fresh perspectives to the academic community. By addressing this unexpected connection, we hope to inject a breath of fresh air into the scholarly discourse, proving that sometimes, the most astonishing discoveries are made by following the most unlikely breezes.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generated in Madagascar has been a topic of negligible interest in the scholarly literature, despite its potential to blow away preconceived notions and fan the flames of curiosity. Smith et al. (2015) initiated this gusty exploration with their investigation into media dissemination and environmental impact, although their study largely skirted the zephyr of a connection with wind power generation. Meanwhile, Doe (2017) attempted to harness the tempestuous energy of wind power data, yet the breezy intersection with newspaper counts remained unexplored in their analysis. Jones (2019) provided a mild breeze of insight into journalism and its societal impact, yet the winds of correlation with sustainable energy were left uncharted in their study.
Turning to the realms of non-fiction, "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame, and "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell, both of which may have breezily alluded to the potential link between media and wind power in their metaphorical representations. Furthermore, in the realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" offers an air of magic and intrigue that may mirror the unexpected connection we seek to unravel in our study. On the lighter side, memes such as "The Tornado Siren Guy" and "Spongebob Squarepants' Blowing Bubbles" provide a playful nod to the wind-themed elements of our investigation.
While the scholarly literature and the windy world of fiction and memes may not have fully captured the tornado of a connection between daily newspapers and wind power, our study takes a whirlwind approach to uncovering the breezy bond that may just blow away conventional assumptions and stimulate a gale of fresh insights in the fields of sustainable energy and media influences.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Count of daily newspapers in the United States and Wind power generated in Madagascar. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2010 to 2018
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Delving into the vast datasets from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period of 2010 to 2018. We took a whirlwind journey through the statistical wind currents to demystify this connection, which may provide gusts of insight for future research in sustainable energy and media influence. This study blows away the notion that these two seemingly disparate factors are like ships passing in the night, and it may just be the breath of fresh air that the academic community needs.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly disparate phenomena has long intrigued researchers across various fields. From the famed connection between ice cream consumption and shark attacks to the link between chocolate consumption and Nobel Prize winners, the realm of unexpected correlations never fails to captivate the curious minds of academia. In this study, we embark on an investigation that might just blow your mind, as we delve into the curious relationship between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar.
As we navigate through this research, it is important to emphasize the significance of investigating obscure connections, as they often lead to serendipitous discoveries that challenge conventional wisdom. While it might appear as a mere flight of fancy to some, our exploration of this unconventional relationship holds the potential to provide valuable insights into the realms of sustainable energy and media impact.
The world of statistics is like a windy day at the beach – relentless and occasionally unpredictable. Our quest is akin to attempting to capture the swirling patterns of wind currents, hoping to uncover the hidden forces that guide these observable phenomena. Through the rigorous analysis of extensive datasets, we set out to untangle the web of interconnected variables and unearth the winds of significance that may dictate the relationship between daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generation in Madagascar.
In this paper, we navigate through the valleys and peaks of statistical analysis to shed light on an unlikely union between the daily dissemination of news and the breezy production of wind power. As we unravel this association, we aim to challenge conventional assumptions and provide a gust of fresh perspectives to the academic community. By addressing this unexpected connection, we hope to inject a breath of fresh air into the scholarly discourse, proving that sometimes, the most astonishing discoveries are made by following the most unlikely breezes.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on our unusual journey through the statistical winds, we employed a methodology that allowed us to navigate the complexities of this unexpected connection between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Our data collection phase resembled a scavenger hunt at times, with our research team scouring the depths of the internet and delving into the treasure troves of Statista and the Energy Information Administration.
The first step of our methodology involved compiling comprehensive data from 2010 to 2018 regarding the count of daily newspapers in the United States. This task required meticulous attention to detail, much like attempting to capture the fluttering of a delicate news article on a blustery day. We brought together data from various authoritative sources, taking care to ensure the accuracy and completeness of our dataset.
Simultaneously, our team harnessed the power of the web, albeit in a different guise, to harvest information on the wind power generated in Madagascar during the designated time period. Our expedition through online repositories resembled a proverbial kite-flying exercise, as we gathered data from reputable sources and weathered the gusts of information available.
With our datasets in hand, we embarked on the statistical odyssey of analysis, employing a range of tools and techniques to unravel the intricacies of the relationship between these two seemingly incongruent variables. Our approach was akin to attempting to predict the direction of the wind – a task requiring both precision and an appreciation for the whims of statistical turbulence.
Employing a series of regression analyses and time series models, we sought to capture the essence of this surprising correlation. Like intrepid sailors on uncharted seas, we navigated through the waves of data, charting our course through the statistical tempest to uncover the hidden patterns that dictated the connection between daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generation in Madagascar.
Additionally, we utilized advanced statistical software to conduct various tests, ensuring that our findings were robust and reliable. Our quest was not without its share of challenges, as we wrestled with the enigmatic forces of statistical significance and navigated through the complex interplay of variables.
Finally, having completed our analysis, we arrived at the shores of inference, where we interpreted the results of our investigation with care and precision. Like a weather vane pointing towards the prevailing breeze, our findings shed light on the remarkable correlation between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar, offering insights that may blow away preconceived notions and inspire future research.
In summary, our methodology encapsulated a journey of data accumulation, statistical analysis, and interpretation, as we ruffled the feathers of convention and sought to reveal the unexpected winds of connection between these disparate yet intriguing variables.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Count of daily newspapers in the United States and Wind power generated in Madagascar. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 2010 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9897895, r-squared of 0.9796833, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Delving into the vast datasets from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period of 2010 to 2018. We took a whirlwind journey through the statistical wind currents to demystify this connection, which may provide gusts of insight for future research in sustainable energy and media influence. This study blows away the notion that these two seemingly disparate factors are like ships passing in the night, and it may just be the breath of fresh air that the academic community needs.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The correlation between seemingly disparate phenomena has long intrigued researchers across various fields. From the famed connection between ice cream consumption and shark attacks to the link between chocolate consumption and Nobel Prize winners, the realm of unexpected correlations never fails to captivate the curious minds of academia. In this study, we embark on an investigation that might just blow your mind, as we delve into the curious relationship between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar.
As we navigate through this research, it is important to emphasize the significance of investigating obscure connections, as they often lead to serendipitous discoveries that challenge conventional wisdom. While it might appear as a mere flight of fancy to some, our exploration of this unconventional relationship holds the potential to provide valuable insights into the realms of sustainable energy and media impact.
The world of statistics is like a windy day at the beach – relentless and occasionally unpredictable. Our quest is akin to attempting to capture the swirling patterns of wind currents, hoping to uncover the hidden forces that guide these observable phenomena. Through the rigorous analysis of extensive datasets, we set out to untangle the web of interconnected variables and unearth the winds of significance that may dictate the relationship between daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generation in Madagascar.
In this paper, we navigate through the valleys and peaks of statistical analysis to shed light on an unlikely union between the daily dissemination of news and the breezy production of wind power. As we unravel this association, we aim to challenge conventional assumptions and provide a gust of fresh perspectives to the academic community. By addressing this unexpected connection, we hope to inject a breath of fresh air into the scholarly discourse, proving that sometimes, the most astonishing discoveries are made by following the most unlikely breezes.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar revealed a surprisingly robust correlation. Over the time period of 2010 to 2018, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9897895, indicating an almost impeccably strong positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9796833, suggesting that approximately 98% of the variability in wind power generated in Madagascar can be explained by the count of daily newspapers in the United States. The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of statistical significance to this breezy relationship, solidifying our findings with a gust of confidence.
In our scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points dance harmoniously along the regression line, portraying a clear and compelling association between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. The wind power seems to echo the whispers of the daily newspapers, as if their influence is carried over the oceans to the distant lands of Madagascar. It's as if the winds are confessing to their paper-laden source of inspiration.
This unexpected correlation between media dissemination and sustainable energy production suggests a potential intercontinental connection that defies conventional boundaries. While some may view this as a mere statistical oddity, our findings have blown away the presumption that these variables operate in separate spheres. This unlikely union challenges our preconceptions and invites us to explore the unseen currents that bind seemingly unconnected domains.
The robustness of the correlation coefficient implies that the influence of daily newspapers in the United States may extend beyond information dissemination, reaching across continents to impact wind power generation in Madagascar. This breezy relationship between media and sustainable energy stands as a testament to the intricate and often inexplicable interconnections that permeate our world.
These findings, while initially unexpected, serve as a gentle reminder that the world of statistics is full of surprises and that the winds of correlation can carry us to unforeseen and enlightening destinations, even if we didn't expect to end up in Madagascar. Our study provides a gust of insight and inspires future research endeavors to further explore the windy realms of unexpected connections in the academic landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Count of daily newspapers in the United States and Wind power generated in Madagascar. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Delving into the vast datasets from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period of 2010 to 2018. We took a whirlwind journey through the statistical wind currents to demystify this connection, which may provide gusts of insight for future research in sustainable energy and media influence. This study blows away the notion that these two seemingly disparate factors are like ships passing in the night, and it may just be the breath of fresh air that the academic community needs.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generated in Madagascar has been a topic of negligible interest in the scholarly literature, despite its potential to blow away preconceived notions and fan the flames of curiosity. Smith et al. (2015) initiated this gusty exploration with their investigation into media dissemination and environmental impact, although their study largely skirted the zephyr of a connection with wind power generation. Meanwhile, Doe (2017) attempted to harness the tempestuous energy of wind power data, yet the breezy intersection with newspaper counts remained unexplored in their analysis. Jones (2019) provided a mild breeze of insight into journalism and its societal impact, yet the winds of correlation with sustainable energy were left uncharted in their study.
Turning to the realms of non-fiction, "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame, and "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell, both of which may have breezily alluded to the potential link between media and wind power in their metaphorical representations. Furthermore, in the realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" offers an air of magic and intrigue that may mirror the unexpected connection we seek to unravel in our study. On the lighter side, memes such as "The Tornado Siren Guy" and "Spongebob Squarepants' Blowing Bubbles" provide a playful nod to the wind-themed elements of our investigation.
While the scholarly literature and the windy world of fiction and memes may not have fully captured the tornado of a connection between daily newspapers and wind power, our study takes a whirlwind approach to uncovering the breezy bond that may just blow away conventional assumptions and stimulate a gale of fresh insights in the fields of sustainable energy and media influences.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar revealed a surprisingly robust correlation. Over the time period of 2010 to 2018, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9897895, indicating an almost impeccably strong positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9796833, suggesting that approximately 98% of the variability in wind power generated in Madagascar can be explained by the count of daily newspapers in the United States. The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of statistical significance to this breezy relationship, solidifying our findings with a gust of confidence.
In our scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points dance harmoniously along the regression line, portraying a clear and compelling association between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. The wind power seems to echo the whispers of the daily newspapers, as if their influence is carried over the oceans to the distant lands of Madagascar. It's as if the winds are confessing to their paper-laden source of inspiration.
This unexpected correlation between media dissemination and sustainable energy production suggests a potential intercontinental connection that defies conventional boundaries. While some may view this as a mere statistical oddity, our findings have blown away the presumption that these variables operate in separate spheres. This unlikely union challenges our preconceptions and invites us to explore the unseen currents that bind seemingly unconnected domains.
The robustness of the correlation coefficient implies that the influence of daily newspapers in the United States may extend beyond information dissemination, reaching across continents to impact wind power generation in Madagascar. This breezy relationship between media and sustainable energy stands as a testament to the intricate and often inexplicable interconnections that permeate our world.
These findings, while initially unexpected, serve as a gentle reminder that the world of statistics is full of surprises and that the winds of correlation can carry us to unforeseen and enlightening destinations, even if we didn't expect to end up in Madagascar. Our study provides a gust of insight and inspires future research endeavors to further explore the windy realms of unexpected connections in the academic landscape.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our study has unraveled a distinct and unexpectedly strong correlation between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar, defying prior assumptions and blowing through the scholarly neglect this peculiar relationship has long suffered. As we navigate through the tempest of our findings, it becomes clear that this breezy connection may carry significance beyond mere statistical oddity.
Our results are in line with the prescient inklings of Smith et al. (2015), who laid the groundwork for this exploration, albeit with airier implications. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 we uncovered provides empirical support for the notion that the winds of media influence may indeed shape the sustainable energy landscape of other regions. It seems that the influence of daily newspapers in the United States stretches farther than the eye can see, quite possibly across oceans and continents, to whisper into the ears of wind turbines in Madagascar. Consequently, the scarcity of interest in this topic within the scholarly literature may be a considerable gusting oversight that our findings aim to rectify.
Moreover, our results echo the whispers of Doe's (2017) attempt to harness the tempestuous energy of wind power data, encouraging a reevaluation of the breezy intersection with newspaper counts in future research endeavors. While Doe's analysis merely brushed with the wind, our study has blown the lid off a previously underestimated connection. Similarly, Jones (2019)'s assessment of journalism's societal impact, although swirling with insight, may have overlooked the zephyr of correlation with sustainable energy, a link we have now substantiated with our robust statistical findings.
It is important to note that our study does not imply causation between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generated in Madagascar, as correlation does not necessarily imply causation, nor weather manipulation through headlines. However, the strength of the correlation we have uncovered urges the academic community to consider the unseen and surprising currents flowing in the academic landscape, much like the characters in Kenneth Grahame's "The Wind in the Willows" were swept away by the River of correlation in our data.
Our findings have swept away the presumption that these variables operate in separate spheres, propelling us to explore the unseen pod of statistics which binds seemingly unconnected domains. The winds of correlation can carry us to unforeseen and enlightening destinations, even if we didn't expect to end up in Madagascar. This unlikely union challenges our preconceptions and invites further exploration of the whirlwind realms of unexpected connections in the academic landscape, proving once again that truth can be stranger than fiction and that every statistic has a story to tell.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Count of daily newspapers in the United States and Wind power generated in Madagascar. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Delving into the vast datasets from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period of 2010 to 2018. We took a whirlwind journey through the statistical wind currents to demystify this connection, which may provide gusts of insight for future research in sustainable energy and media influence. This study blows away the notion that these two seemingly disparate factors are like ships passing in the night, and it may just be the breath of fresh air that the academic community needs.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The correlation between seemingly disparate phenomena has long intrigued researchers across various fields. From the famed connection between ice cream consumption and shark attacks to the link between chocolate consumption and Nobel Prize winners, the realm of unexpected correlations never fails to captivate the curious minds of academia. In this study, we embark on an investigation that might just blow your mind, as we delve into the curious relationship between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar.
As we navigate through this research, it is important to emphasize the significance of investigating obscure connections, as they often lead to serendipitous discoveries that challenge conventional wisdom. While it might appear as a mere flight of fancy to some, our exploration of this unconventional relationship holds the potential to provide valuable insights into the realms of sustainable energy and media impact.
The world of statistics is like a windy day at the beach – relentless and occasionally unpredictable. Our quest is akin to attempting to capture the swirling patterns of wind currents, hoping to uncover the hidden forces that guide these observable phenomena. Through the rigorous analysis of extensive datasets, we set out to untangle the web of interconnected variables and unearth the winds of significance that may dictate the relationship between daily newspapers in the United States and wind power generation in Madagascar.
In this paper, we navigate through the valleys and peaks of statistical analysis to shed light on an unlikely union between the daily dissemination of news and the breezy production of wind power. As we unravel this association, we aim to challenge conventional assumptions and provide a gust of fresh perspectives to the academic community. By addressing this unexpected connection, we hope to inject a breath of fresh air into the scholarly discourse, proving that sometimes, the most astonishing discoveries are made by following the most unlikely breezes.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar revealed a surprisingly robust correlation. Over the time period of 2010 to 2018, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.9897895, indicating an almost impeccably strong positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9796833, suggesting that approximately 98% of the variability in wind power generated in Madagascar can be explained by the count of daily newspapers in the United States. The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of statistical significance to this breezy relationship, solidifying our findings with a gust of confidence.
In our scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points dance harmoniously along the regression line, portraying a clear and compelling association between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. The wind power seems to echo the whispers of the daily newspapers, as if their influence is carried over the oceans to the distant lands of Madagascar. It's as if the winds are confessing to their paper-laden source of inspiration.
This unexpected correlation between media dissemination and sustainable energy production suggests a potential intercontinental connection that defies conventional boundaries. While some may view this as a mere statistical oddity, our findings have blown away the presumption that these variables operate in separate spheres. This unlikely union challenges our preconceptions and invites us to explore the unseen currents that bind seemingly unconnected domains.
The robustness of the correlation coefficient implies that the influence of daily newspapers in the United States may extend beyond information dissemination, reaching across continents to impact wind power generation in Madagascar. This breezy relationship between media and sustainable energy stands as a testament to the intricate and often inexplicable interconnections that permeate our world.
These findings, while initially unexpected, serve as a gentle reminder that the world of statistics is full of surprises and that the winds of correlation can carry us to unforeseen and enlightening destinations, even if we didn't expect to end up in Madagascar. Our study provides a gust of insight and inspires future research endeavors to further explore the windy realms of unexpected connections in the academic landscape.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has uncovered a strikingly robust correlation between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar, challenging conventional notions of causality and revealing an unexpected intercontinental connection. This intriguing relationship not only underscores the complexity of statistical associations but also invites further exploration into the cross-continental influence of media and sustainable energy production.
Our findings suggest that the winds of correlation can carry us beyond the familiar realms of statistics, blowing us into uncharted territories where daily newspapers dance with the breezy rhythms of wind power generation. As we wrap up this investigation, we are left with the gentle whisper of statistical significance echoing across the vast oceans, connecting the newsrooms of the United States to the wind turbines of Madagascar.
It is clear that this breezy relationship is not just a statistical anomaly but rather a compelling example of the unforeseen and inexplicable connections that permeate our world. As we close this chapter on the unexpected union between media dissemination and sustainable energy production, we are left not only with a deeper understanding of statistical correlations but also with a newfound appreciation for the whimsical nature of academic inquiry.
Therefore, in light of these compelling findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as our study has already blown away the presumption that these variables operate in separate spheres, leaving behind a gust of insight that will linger in the scholarly discourse for some time.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of News and Wind Power Relations
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Cross-Continental Wind Studies and Media Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar with an abstract of In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the count of daily newspapers in the United States and the wind power generated in Madagascar. Delving into the vast datasets from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9897895 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period of 2010 to 2018. We took a whirlwind journey through the statistical wind currents to demystify this connection, which may provide gusts of insight for future research in sustainable energy and media influence. This study blows away the notion that these two seemingly disparate factors are like ships passing in the night, and it may just be the breath of fresh air that the academic community needs.
ChatGPT:
newspapers, United States, wind power, Madagascar, correlation, statistical analysis, sustainable energy, media influence, renewable energy, data analysis
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Count of daily newspapers in the United StatesSource: Statista
See what else correlates with Count of daily newspapers in the United States
Wind power generated in Madagascar
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Madagascar in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Madagascar

Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9796833 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Madagascar) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Count of daily newspapers in the United States) over the 9 years from 2010 through 2018.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.51E-7. 0.0000003506521686048755500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 3.51E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,851,829 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.95, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
Count of daily newspapers in the United States (Newspapers) | 0 | 1452 | 1381 | 1425 | 1395 | 1331 | 1286 | 1277 | 1279 |
Wind power generated in Madagascar (Billion kWh) | 0.00045 | 0.00047 | 0.00047 | 0.00047 | 0.00047 | 0.00047 | 0.00047 | 0.00047 | 0.00047 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,1452,1381,1425,1395,1331,1286,1277,1279,])
array_2 = np.array([0.00045,0.00047,0.00047,0.00047,0.00047,0.00047,0.00047,0.00047,0.00047,])
array_1_name = "Count of daily newspapers in the United States"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Madagascar"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Count of daily newspapers in the United States
- Line chart for only Wind power generated in Madagascar
- The spurious research paper: Blowing in the News: The Breezy Relationship Between Daily Newspapers in the United States and Wind Power Generated in Madagascar
Hats off to you for rating!
Correlation ID: 1182 · Black Variable ID: 390 · Red Variable ID: 23804