about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,169 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Gasoline Prices in the US and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Sweden.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As gasoline prices in the US rise, more Americans decide to carpool. This leads to an increase in human body heat in confined spaces, which is then captured and converted into electricity by specially designed sauna turbines in Sweden, ultimately contributing to a surge in biomass power generation. It's a steamy solution to energy production!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: The image prompt for DALL·E-3 would be as follows: "Generate an image that combines futuristic elements and a juxtaposition of a gas station and a Swedish countryside scene. On the left side, depict a busy gas station with a line of futuristic cars waiting to refuel, and the prices on the pump display rising steadily. On the right side, create a serene Swedish countryside with a traditional red wooden house. Instead of traditional power lines, illustrate the house connected to a small forest where people are converting trees into wood chips for a biomass power plant. Show that the smoke from the power plant is white and clean, and the house is glowing with warm, sustainable energy. Pay attention to the futuristic elements and the contrast between traditional and sustainable energy sources." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Rising Gasoline Prices in the US Fingered as Root Cause of Biomass Power Surge in Sweden! It seems that the fuel for global warming is also fueling a green revolution. As gas prices at the pump soar, Swedes are turning to their own brand of "tree-huggers" to power up their homes. Only time will tell if this trend will "branch" out to other countries!. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Data cyber art 3D Pixar Style Art nouveau Futuristic
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Rising Gasoline Prices in the US Fingered as Root Cause of Biomass Power Surge in Sweden! It seems that the fuel for global warming is also fueling a green revolution. As gas prices at the pump soar, Swedes are turning to their own brand of "tree-huggers" to power up their homes. Only time will tell if this trend will "branch" out to other countries!
ChatGPT: On the left, we see a gas station with a line of cars waiting to fill up, and the prices on the pump display are rising steadily. On the right, there is a picturesque Swedish countryside with a typical red wooden house. Instead of traditional power lines, the house is connected to a small forest where a group of people is carefully cutting down trees and converting them into wood chips to fuel a biomass power plant. The smoke coming from the power plant is white and clean, and the house is glowing with warm, sustainable energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: On the left, we see a gas station with a line of cars waiting to fill up, and the prices on the pump display are rising steadily. On the right, there is a picturesque Swedish countryside with a typical red wooden house. Instead of traditional power lines, the house is connected to a small forest where a group of people is carefully cutting down trees and converting them into wood chips to fuel a biomass power plant. The smoke coming from the power plant is white and clean, and the house is glowing with warm, sustainable energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: The image prompt for DALL·E-3 would be as follows: "Generate an image that combines futuristic elements and a juxtaposition of a gas station and a Swedish countryside scene. On the left side, depict a busy gas station with a line of futuristic cars waiting to refuel, and the prices on the pump display rising steadily. On the right side, create a serene Swedish countryside with a traditional red wooden house. Instead of traditional power lines, illustrate the house connected to a small forest where people are converting trees into wood chips for a biomass power plant. Show that the smoke from the power plant is white and clean, and the house is glowing with warm, sustainable energy. Pay attention to the futuristic elements and the contrast between traditional and sustainable energy sources."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Gasoline Prices in the US caused Biomass power generated in Sweden to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden

The Journal of Biofuels Economics and Renewable Energy Policy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass power generated in Sweden. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Statista and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to untangle the intricate web of relationships between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Drawing from an extensive time series spanning over three decades, our research team employed advanced statistical analyses to reveal an astonishing correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 with a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robust association between fluctuating gasoline prices and the dynamics of biomass power generation across the Atlantic. While the nature of this connection may seem elusive at first glance, our study sheds light on the underlying interplay of market forces and resource utilization. As we delve into the implications of this connection, the question arises: Is the fuel for thought from gasoline pricing powering the biomass innovation in Sweden? This interdisciplinary inquiry challenges conventional wisdom and enriches the discourse on global energy dynamics, emphasizing the pivotal role of cross-border influences and intercontinental collaboration in the realm of sustainable energy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass power generated in Sweden. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to untangle the intricate web of relationships between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Drawing from an extensive time series spanning over three decades, our research team employed advanced statistical analyses to reveal an astonishing correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 with a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robust association between fluctuating gasoline prices and the dynamics of biomass power generation across the Atlantic. While the nature of this connection may seem elusive at first glance, our study sheds light on the underlying interplay of market forces and resource utilization. As we delve into the implications of this connection, the question arises: Is the fuel for thought from gasoline pricing powering the biomass innovation in Sweden? This interdisciplinary inquiry challenges conventional wisdom and enriches the discourse on global energy dynamics, emphasizing the pivotal role of cross-border influences and intercontinental collaboration in the realm of sustainable energy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the enigmatic dance of gasoline prices and biomass power generation—like an intricate tango of supply, demand, and renewable energy prowess. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the adage that "where there's smoke, there's fire," albeit in the context of sustainable energy and transcontinental economics.

It is with a blend of curiosity and skepticism that we delve into the intersection of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might think that comparing the price of gasoline in the US to biomass power generation in Sweden is like comparing apples to orangutans, but our discerning analysis promises to reveal deep-seated connections beneath the surface.

The unfolding saga of our research encompasses the intricacies of fuel markets, statistical acrobatics, and the undeniable allure of cross-continental data sets. With a twinkle in our eyes and a plethora of spreadsheets at our disposal, we set out to decipher the underlying symbiosis between these variables. Through the lens of statistics and economic theory, we endeavor to decipher the quirky ballet of petrol prices and bioenergy wizardry.

As we weigh the implications and ramifications of our findings, a pun-intended question lingers in our minds: Are these gasoline-fueled sparks igniting the fires of innovation in Swedish biomass power generation? The notion may sound far-fetched, but our scientific sleuthing aims to validate this captivating hypothesis.

Join us in this scientific escapade where statistical significance meets energy economics, and where the mundane world of fuel prices reveals its hidden link to the captivating realm of sustainable power dynamics. Our quest promises to unveil the cryptic chemistry between transatlantic gas guzzling and Scandinavian biofuel prowess, offering an insightful contribution to the lighthearted yet deeply consequential field of global energy interplay.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass power generated in Sweden. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to untangle the intricate web of relationships between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Drawing from an extensive time series spanning over three decades, our research team employed advanced statistical analyses to reveal an astonishing correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 with a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robust association between fluctuating gasoline prices and the dynamics of biomass power generation across the Atlantic. While the nature of this connection may seem elusive at first glance, our study sheds light on the underlying interplay of market forces and resource utilization. As we delve into the implications of this connection, the question arises: Is the fuel for thought from gasoline pricing powering the biomass innovation in Sweden? This interdisciplinary inquiry challenges conventional wisdom and enriches the discourse on global energy dynamics, emphasizing the pivotal role of cross-border influences and intercontinental collaboration in the realm of sustainable energy.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the enigmatic dance of gasoline prices and biomass power generation—like an intricate tango of supply, demand, and renewable energy prowess. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the adage that "where there's smoke, there's fire," albeit in the context of sustainable energy and transcontinental economics.
It is with a blend of curiosity and skepticism that we delve into the intersection of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might think that comparing the price of gasoline in the US to biomass power generation in Sweden is like comparing apples to orangutans, but our discerning analysis promises to reveal deep-seated connections beneath the surface.
The unfolding saga of our research encompasses the intricacies of fuel markets, statistical acrobatics, and the undeniable allure of cross-continental data sets. With a twinkle in our eyes and a plethora of spreadsheets at our disposal, we set out to decipher the underlying symbiosis between these variables. Through the lens of statistics and economic theory, we endeavor to decipher the quirky ballet of petrol prices and bioenergy wizardry.
As we weigh the implications and ramifications of our findings, a pun-intended question lingers in our minds: Are these gasoline-fueled sparks igniting the fires of innovation in Swedish biomass power generation? The notion may sound far-fetched, but our scientific sleuthing aims to validate this captivating hypothesis.
Join us in this scientific escapade where statistical significance meets energy economics, and where the mundane world of fuel prices reveals its hidden link to the captivating realm of sustainable power dynamics. Our quest promises to unveil the cryptic chemistry between transatlantic gas guzzling and Scandinavian biofuel prowess, offering an insightful contribution to the lighthearted yet deeply consequential field of global energy interplay.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2015) delineated the intricate relationship between gasoline prices and energy markets in the United States, providing a comprehensive overview of the economic forces at play. Doe (2017) extended this discourse to incorporate the dynamics of renewable energy strategies, shedding light on the growing relevance of biomass power in the global energy landscape. Jones (2019) contributed a seminal work that examined the environmental impact of bioenergy production, emphasizing the imperative for sustainable practices in biomass power generation. These serious-minded scholars laid the groundwork for our current investigation, albeit with considerably less humor and wordplay than we aim to deliver.

Turning to the bookshelf, "The Price of Oil" by Roberts (2018) offers a penetrating analysis of the volatile gasoline market, while "Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels, and Chemicals" by Wyman (2015) provides a thorough exploration of biomass utilization trends and technological advancements. On a more fanciful note, "The Gasoline Goblins" by Sparkle (2020) and "Biomass Boogie" by Greenleaf (2016) whimsically personify the elusive and interconnected nature of our focal topics. As we delve further into the literary landscape, it's impossible to overlook the ubiquitous "Distracted Boyfriend" meme, metaphorically representing the unpredictable allure of energy market fluctuations and their irreverent impact on the biomass power sector.

In amalgamating these divergent sources, our research aspires to synthesize the seriousness of scholarly inquiry with the levity of imaginative exploration. As we purport to unravel the intercontinental intricacies of fuel economics and bioenergy dynamics, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, where statistical significance meets pun-tastic ponderings, and where the seemingly mundane world of fuel prices reveals its unexpected link to the captivating realm of sustainable power dynamics. This review, like a reliable GPS for navigating the convoluted terrain of gasoline prices and biomass power, sets the stage for the revelatory findings and mischievous musings that lie ahead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass power generated in Sweden. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to untangle the intricate web of relationships between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Drawing from an extensive time series spanning over three decades, our research team employed advanced statistical analyses to reveal an astonishing correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 with a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robust association between fluctuating gasoline prices and the dynamics of biomass power generation across the Atlantic. While the nature of this connection may seem elusive at first glance, our study sheds light on the underlying interplay of market forces and resource utilization. As we delve into the implications of this connection, the question arises: Is the fuel for thought from gasoline pricing powering the biomass innovation in Sweden? This interdisciplinary inquiry challenges conventional wisdom and enriches the discourse on global energy dynamics, emphasizing the pivotal role of cross-border influences and intercontinental collaboration in the realm of sustainable energy.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the enigmatic dance of gasoline prices and biomass power generation—like an intricate tango of supply, demand, and renewable energy prowess. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the adage that "where there's smoke, there's fire," albeit in the context of sustainable energy and transcontinental economics.
It is with a blend of curiosity and skepticism that we delve into the intersection of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might think that comparing the price of gasoline in the US to biomass power generation in Sweden is like comparing apples to orangutans, but our discerning analysis promises to reveal deep-seated connections beneath the surface.
The unfolding saga of our research encompasses the intricacies of fuel markets, statistical acrobatics, and the undeniable allure of cross-continental data sets. With a twinkle in our eyes and a plethora of spreadsheets at our disposal, we set out to decipher the underlying symbiosis between these variables. Through the lens of statistics and economic theory, we endeavor to decipher the quirky ballet of petrol prices and bioenergy wizardry.
As we weigh the implications and ramifications of our findings, a pun-intended question lingers in our minds: Are these gasoline-fueled sparks igniting the fires of innovation in Swedish biomass power generation? The notion may sound far-fetched, but our scientific sleuthing aims to validate this captivating hypothesis.
Join us in this scientific escapade where statistical significance meets energy economics, and where the mundane world of fuel prices reveals its hidden link to the captivating realm of sustainable power dynamics. Our quest promises to unveil the cryptic chemistry between transatlantic gas guzzling and Scandinavian biofuel prowess, offering an insightful contribution to the lighthearted yet deeply consequential field of global energy interplay.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In unraveling the curious correlation between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden, our research team embarked on a methodological escapade that combined the finesse of a statistical tango, the precision of a mathematical waltz, and the serendipity of data exploration akin to a scavenger hunt. With a touch of whimsy and a lot of rigorous research, we approached this investigation with the ideal blend of scrutiny and mirth.

Data Collection:
Our data collection process involved traversing the magnetic fields of the internet, navigating through the labyrinth of websites, and harnessing the powers of reputable databases, principally Statista and the Energy Information Administration. From these digital treasure troves, we meticulously gathered historical data on gasoline prices in the US and biomass power generation in Sweden spanning the period from 1990 to 2021. Our trusty spreadsheets and data mining tools served as our compass in this audacious expedition, ensuring that no statistical stone was left unturned.

Statistical Concoctions:
To kick-start our statistical symphony, we employed a cocktail of analytical methods, including time series analysis, cross-correlation techniques, and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modeling. These tools, akin to a scientific cauldron brewing a statistical potion, allowed us to disentangle the complexities of the intertwined time series data, revealing the hidden patterns and connections between the fluctuating gasoline prices and the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the land of the midnight sun.

Modeling Magic:
In the spirit of scientific enchantment, we conjured up a set of regression models, embracing the dance of linear, polynomial, and multivariate regression to capture the essence of this cross-continental relationship. As we fine-tuned our models to encapsulate the nuances of these seemingly disparate variables, our pursuit of statistical truth resembled a captivating spellbinding performance, complete with coefficients, significance tests, and model goodness-of-fit metrics acting as the stars of this empirical ballet.

Robustness Robustification:
To ensure the robustness of our findings and guard against statistical sleight of hand, we conducted sensitivity analyses, stability tests, and robustness checks. This rigorous vetting process, akin to probing the tenacity of a scientific truth serum, fortified our confidence in the validity of the observed correlation and the significance of our findings within the realm of academic inquiry.

In summary, our methodological odyssey traversed the realms of data delving, statistical alchemy, and empirical finesse, culminating in an intricate tapestry of statistical association between gasoline prices in the US and biomass power generation in Sweden. Like a scholarly scavenger hunt with a penchant for statistical surprises, our methodology captured the essence of this ostentatiously intercontinental interaction, promising to add a drop of whimsy to the burgeoning literature on the connections between energy markets and sustainable power dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass power generated in Sweden. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9016321, r-squared of 0.8129405, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to untangle the intricate web of relationships between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Drawing from an extensive time series spanning over three decades, our research team employed advanced statistical analyses to reveal an astonishing correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 with a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robust association between fluctuating gasoline prices and the dynamics of biomass power generation across the Atlantic. While the nature of this connection may seem elusive at first glance, our study sheds light on the underlying interplay of market forces and resource utilization. As we delve into the implications of this connection, the question arises: Is the fuel for thought from gasoline pricing powering the biomass innovation in Sweden? This interdisciplinary inquiry challenges conventional wisdom and enriches the discourse on global energy dynamics, emphasizing the pivotal role of cross-border influences and intercontinental collaboration in the realm of sustainable energy.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the enigmatic dance of gasoline prices and biomass power generation—like an intricate tango of supply, demand, and renewable energy prowess. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the adage that "where there's smoke, there's fire," albeit in the context of sustainable energy and transcontinental economics.
It is with a blend of curiosity and skepticism that we delve into the intersection of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might think that comparing the price of gasoline in the US to biomass power generation in Sweden is like comparing apples to orangutans, but our discerning analysis promises to reveal deep-seated connections beneath the surface.
The unfolding saga of our research encompasses the intricacies of fuel markets, statistical acrobatics, and the undeniable allure of cross-continental data sets. With a twinkle in our eyes and a plethora of spreadsheets at our disposal, we set out to decipher the underlying symbiosis between these variables. Through the lens of statistics and economic theory, we endeavor to decipher the quirky ballet of petrol prices and bioenergy wizardry.
As we weigh the implications and ramifications of our findings, a pun-intended question lingers in our minds: Are these gasoline-fueled sparks igniting the fires of innovation in Swedish biomass power generation? The notion may sound far-fetched, but our scientific sleuthing aims to validate this captivating hypothesis.
Join us in this scientific escapade where statistical significance meets energy economics, and where the mundane world of fuel prices reveals its hidden link to the captivating realm of sustainable power dynamics. Our quest promises to unveil the cryptic chemistry between transatlantic gas guzzling and Scandinavian biofuel prowess, offering an insightful contribution to the lighthearted yet deeply consequential field of global energy interplay.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Over the time period from 1990 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 was identified, a figure that would induce envy even in the most tightly bonded molecules. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8129405 further reinforces the robustness of this correlation, reminding us that statistical significance can be as captivating as a well-executed magic trick. Indeed, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds an additional layer of credibility, leaving little room for doubt about the veracity of this fuelish connection.

To further illustrate this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the formidable relationship between gasoline prices in the US and the generation of biomass power in Sweden. This figure offers a snapshot of the synchronous dance performed by these seemingly incongruent variables, akin to a well-choreographed ballet of scientific intrigue.

The strength of this correlation prompts us to ponder the intricacies of market dynamics on both sides of the Atlantic. Could it be that the ebb and flow of gasoline prices in the US serves as a clandestine muse for the ingenuity behind biomass power generation in Sweden? This titillating hypothesis opens a Pandora's Box of questions, as we seek to understand the enchanting interplay of economic forces and renewable energy innovation.

In summary, our findings not only underscore the statistically significant association between gasoline prices in the US and biomass power generation in Sweden but also ignite profound curiosity about the underlying mechanisms at play. This unexpected connection between energy markets on different continents adds an intriguing layer to the narrative of sustainable energy transitions, demonstrating that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables, there may lie a captivating storyline waiting to be unveiled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass power generated in Sweden. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to untangle the intricate web of relationships between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Drawing from an extensive time series spanning over three decades, our research team employed advanced statistical analyses to reveal an astonishing correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 with a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robust association between fluctuating gasoline prices and the dynamics of biomass power generation across the Atlantic. While the nature of this connection may seem elusive at first glance, our study sheds light on the underlying interplay of market forces and resource utilization. As we delve into the implications of this connection, the question arises: Is the fuel for thought from gasoline pricing powering the biomass innovation in Sweden? This interdisciplinary inquiry challenges conventional wisdom and enriches the discourse on global energy dynamics, emphasizing the pivotal role of cross-border influences and intercontinental collaboration in the realm of sustainable energy.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2015) delineated the intricate relationship between gasoline prices and energy markets in the United States, providing a comprehensive overview of the economic forces at play. Doe (2017) extended this discourse to incorporate the dynamics of renewable energy strategies, shedding light on the growing relevance of biomass power in the global energy landscape. Jones (2019) contributed a seminal work that examined the environmental impact of bioenergy production, emphasizing the imperative for sustainable practices in biomass power generation. These serious-minded scholars laid the groundwork for our current investigation, albeit with considerably less humor and wordplay than we aim to deliver.
Turning to the bookshelf, "The Price of Oil" by Roberts (2018) offers a penetrating analysis of the volatile gasoline market, while "Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels, and Chemicals" by Wyman (2015) provides a thorough exploration of biomass utilization trends and technological advancements. On a more fanciful note, "The Gasoline Goblins" by Sparkle (2020) and "Biomass Boogie" by Greenleaf (2016) whimsically personify the elusive and interconnected nature of our focal topics. As we delve further into the literary landscape, it's impossible to overlook the ubiquitous "Distracted Boyfriend" meme, metaphorically representing the unpredictable allure of energy market fluctuations and their irreverent impact on the biomass power sector.
In amalgamating these divergent sources, our research aspires to synthesize the seriousness of scholarly inquiry with the levity of imaginative exploration. As we purport to unravel the intercontinental intricacies of fuel economics and bioenergy dynamics, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, where statistical significance meets pun-tastic ponderings, and where the seemingly mundane world of fuel prices reveals its unexpected link to the captivating realm of sustainable power dynamics. This review, like a reliable GPS for navigating the convoluted terrain of gasoline prices and biomass power, sets the stage for the revelatory findings and mischievous musings that lie ahead.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Over the time period from 1990 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 was identified, a figure that would induce envy even in the most tightly bonded molecules. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8129405 further reinforces the robustness of this correlation, reminding us that statistical significance can be as captivating as a well-executed magic trick. Indeed, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds an additional layer of credibility, leaving little room for doubt about the veracity of this fuelish connection.
To further illustrate this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the formidable relationship between gasoline prices in the US and the generation of biomass power in Sweden. This figure offers a snapshot of the synchronous dance performed by these seemingly incongruent variables, akin to a well-choreographed ballet of scientific intrigue.
The strength of this correlation prompts us to ponder the intricacies of market dynamics on both sides of the Atlantic. Could it be that the ebb and flow of gasoline prices in the US serves as a clandestine muse for the ingenuity behind biomass power generation in Sweden? This titillating hypothesis opens a Pandora's Box of questions, as we seek to understand the enchanting interplay of economic forces and renewable energy innovation.
In summary, our findings not only underscore the statistically significant association between gasoline prices in the US and biomass power generation in Sweden but also ignite profound curiosity about the underlying mechanisms at play. This unexpected connection between energy markets on different continents adds an intriguing layer to the narrative of sustainable energy transitions, demonstrating that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables, there may lie a captivating storyline waiting to be unveiled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have brought to light a fascinating and, dare we say, electrifying connection between gasoline prices in the US and biomass power generation in Sweden. Our findings lend weight to the prior research by Smith (2015) and Doe (2017), who may not have realized the potential comedic goldmine of their serious inquiries. Perhaps they should consider incorporating more puns and whimsical metaphors into their research, as it appears to have served us well.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 evokes the image of an unbreakable biochemical bond, albeit one involving economic variables rather than molecules. The r-squared of 0.8129405 only adds to the allure, arousing a sense of fascination comparable to witnessing a grand illusion on stage. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides a level of credibility that might make even the most extravagant magician envious.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the captivating relationship between gasoline prices in the US and the generation of biomass power in Sweden. This serves as a visual reminder that, much like a well-choreographed ballet, statistical significance and scientific intrigue can coalesce into an enthralling performance.

We would be remiss if we did not acknowledge the whimsical literary touch of "The Gasoline Goblins" by Sparkle (2020) and "Biomass Boogie" by Greenleaf (2016), which, although presented as fanciful works, seem to have inadvertently stumbled upon a prescient understanding of our findings. It's almost as if the authors foresaw the serious undercurrent of amusement that our research has unveiled, an unexpected twist worthy of a blockbuster plot.

In conclusion, our study not only reinforces the connection between gasoline prices and biomass power generation but also raises a plethora of questions, akin to the climax of a riveting detective novel or the surprising punchline of a well-crafted joke. The implications of this improbable link transcend the confines of traditional energy research and propel us into a realm of scientific inquiry laced with unexpected quirkiness, reminding us that sometimes, the most serious pursuits can harbor the most delightful surprises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass power generated in Sweden. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to untangle the intricate web of relationships between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Drawing from an extensive time series spanning over three decades, our research team employed advanced statistical analyses to reveal an astonishing correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 with a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robust association between fluctuating gasoline prices and the dynamics of biomass power generation across the Atlantic. While the nature of this connection may seem elusive at first glance, our study sheds light on the underlying interplay of market forces and resource utilization. As we delve into the implications of this connection, the question arises: Is the fuel for thought from gasoline pricing powering the biomass innovation in Sweden? This interdisciplinary inquiry challenges conventional wisdom and enriches the discourse on global energy dynamics, emphasizing the pivotal role of cross-border influences and intercontinental collaboration in the realm of sustainable energy.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the enigmatic dance of gasoline prices and biomass power generation—like an intricate tango of supply, demand, and renewable energy prowess. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the adage that "where there's smoke, there's fire," albeit in the context of sustainable energy and transcontinental economics.
It is with a blend of curiosity and skepticism that we delve into the intersection of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might think that comparing the price of gasoline in the US to biomass power generation in Sweden is like comparing apples to orangutans, but our discerning analysis promises to reveal deep-seated connections beneath the surface.
The unfolding saga of our research encompasses the intricacies of fuel markets, statistical acrobatics, and the undeniable allure of cross-continental data sets. With a twinkle in our eyes and a plethora of spreadsheets at our disposal, we set out to decipher the underlying symbiosis between these variables. Through the lens of statistics and economic theory, we endeavor to decipher the quirky ballet of petrol prices and bioenergy wizardry.
As we weigh the implications and ramifications of our findings, a pun-intended question lingers in our minds: Are these gasoline-fueled sparks igniting the fires of innovation in Swedish biomass power generation? The notion may sound far-fetched, but our scientific sleuthing aims to validate this captivating hypothesis.
Join us in this scientific escapade where statistical significance meets energy economics, and where the mundane world of fuel prices reveals its hidden link to the captivating realm of sustainable power dynamics. Our quest promises to unveil the cryptic chemistry between transatlantic gas guzzling and Scandinavian biofuel prowess, offering an insightful contribution to the lighthearted yet deeply consequential field of global energy interplay.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Over the time period from 1990 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 was identified, a figure that would induce envy even in the most tightly bonded molecules. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8129405 further reinforces the robustness of this correlation, reminding us that statistical significance can be as captivating as a well-executed magic trick. Indeed, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds an additional layer of credibility, leaving little room for doubt about the veracity of this fuelish connection.
To further illustrate this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the formidable relationship between gasoline prices in the US and the generation of biomass power in Sweden. This figure offers a snapshot of the synchronous dance performed by these seemingly incongruent variables, akin to a well-choreographed ballet of scientific intrigue.
The strength of this correlation prompts us to ponder the intricacies of market dynamics on both sides of the Atlantic. Could it be that the ebb and flow of gasoline prices in the US serves as a clandestine muse for the ingenuity behind biomass power generation in Sweden? This titillating hypothesis opens a Pandora's Box of questions, as we seek to understand the enchanting interplay of economic forces and renewable energy innovation.
In summary, our findings not only underscore the statistically significant association between gasoline prices in the US and biomass power generation in Sweden but also ignite profound curiosity about the underlying mechanisms at play. This unexpected connection between energy markets on different continents adds an intriguing layer to the narrative of sustainable energy transitions, demonstrating that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables, there may lie a captivating storyline waiting to be unveiled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

Our investigation into the interwoven tapestry of gasoline prices in the US and the generation of biomass power in Sweden has illuminated a captivating correlation that is as robust as a well-forged chemical bond. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 has emerged as the standout star in this statistical soap opera, leaving us all in awe of its magnetic allure. The r-squared value of 0.8129405 adds an extra dash of drama, reminding us that statistical significance can be as spellbinding as a magician's act. The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as the cherry on top, leaving little room for skepticism and drawing our attention to the tantalizing symphony of price fluctuations and green energy innovation. Our scatterplot, akin to a scientific snapshot capturing the choreographed dance of these variables, stands as a testament to the unlikely yet enthralling marriage between transatlantic fuel prices and Scandinavian bioenergy prowess. Could it be that the fuel for thought from US gasoline pricing is providing the spark for the biomass innovation in Sweden? Our findings not only validate this tantalizing hypothesis but also beckon us to raise our glasses to the unanticipated yet delightful connection that has been unveiled. As we bask in the glory of this discovery, it is with utmost confidence that we assert: no more research is needed in this area. The empirical evidence has spoken, and the stage is set for a new era of cross-continental energy musings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Biofuels Economics and Renewable Energy Policy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Sustainable Energy Economics and Policy (SSEEP)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pricing the Power: The Fuelish Connection Between Gasoline Prices in the US and Biomass Power Generated in Sweden with an abstract of This study endeavors to untangle the intricate web of relationships between gasoline prices in the United States and biomass power generation in Sweden. Drawing from an extensive time series spanning over three decades, our research team employed advanced statistical analyses to reveal an astonishing correlation between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9016321 with a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the robust association between fluctuating gasoline prices and the dynamics of biomass power generation across the Atlantic. While the nature of this connection may seem elusive at first glance, our study sheds light on the underlying interplay of market forces and resource utilization. As we delve into the implications of this connection, the question arises: Is the fuel for thought from gasoline pricing powering the biomass innovation in Sweden? This interdisciplinary inquiry challenges conventional wisdom and enriches the discourse on global energy dynamics, emphasizing the pivotal role of cross-border influences and intercontinental collaboration in the realm of sustainable energy.

ChatGPT:

gasoline prices, biomass power generation, correlation, statistical analysis, US, Sweden, time series, market forces, resource utilization, energy dynamics, sustainable energy, cross-border influences, intercontinental collaboration

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Gasoline Prices in the US
Detailed data title: US Retail Gasoline Price
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Gasoline Prices in the US

Biomass power generated in Sweden
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Sweden in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Sweden

Correlation r = 0.9016321 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8129405 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Sweden) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Gasoline Prices in the US) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-12. 0.0000000000019114238038394668
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 1.9E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 523,170,213,739 random variables You don't actually need 523 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Gasoline Prices in the US (US Dollars per Gallon)1.31.11.091.071.081.111.21.21.031.141.481.421.351.561.852.272.572.83.252.352.783.523.623.513.362.432.142.422.722.62.173.01
Biomass power generated in Sweden (Billion kWh)2.0051.9212.0732.2362.2832.4242.1922.8353.0422.8824.3424.0214.4394.8367.9998.3579.35510.65611.22512.20913.39712.85813.35112.64311.82111.96813.07813.75713.48214.70611.10712.8635




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.3,1.1,1.09,1.07,1.08,1.11,1.2,1.2,1.03,1.14,1.48,1.42,1.35,1.56,1.85,2.27,2.57,2.8,3.25,2.35,2.78,3.52,3.62,3.51,3.36,2.43,2.14,2.42,2.72,2.6,2.17,3.01,])
array_2 = np.array([2.005,1.921,2.073,2.236,2.283,2.424,2.192,2.835,3.042,2.882,4.342,4.021,4.439,4.836,7.999,8.357,9.355,10.656,11.225,12.209,13.397,12.858,13.351,12.643,11.821,11.968,13.078,13.757,13.482,14.706,11.107,12.8635,])
array_1_name = "Gasoline Prices in the US"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Sweden"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1169 · Black Variable ID: 461 · Red Variable ID: 24012
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0