about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,168 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Columbus, Indiana and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts.  The chart goes from 1989 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As air quality improved, the local wildlife in Columbus, Indiana began practicing mindful breathing exercises. This unexpected focus on clean air led to a revolution in interior car design, with an emphasis on creating a more zen and harmonious driving experience. As a result, the seat belts in automobiles became increasingly self-aware and began to buckle up on their own, leading to a spike in automotive recalls for seat belt issues. Remember, clean air isn't just good for your health - it's also inspiring the seat belts in Columbus to find their inner peace!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Certainly! Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic scene in Columbus, Indiana on a clear and sunny day. Show a contrast of blue skies against the improved air quality, with people happily hanging their arms out of car windows to feel the refreshing breeze. Illustrate the trouble brewing as the wind picks up, causing seat belts to tangle and twist, leading to unintended tango-like interactions between drivers and their seat belts. Some drivers appear to be more aggressive, making sudden stops and starts, putting strain on their seat belts. Capture dramatic moments where drivers fling themselves into their cars, putting undue pressure on their seat belts, while hinting at a surge in automotive recalls due to seat belt issues caused by the unexpected consequences of improved air quality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: The increase in good air quality in Columbus, Indiana caused automotive recalls for seat belt issues to also increase because, as the air quality improved, people were more likely to roll down their windows and hang their arms out, feeling the breeze. Unfortunately, this led to a surge in reports of seat belt malfunctions, as the belts became tangled in the wind and tangled up the drivers, unintentionally preforming a type of seat belt tango. Additionally, the crisp, clean air made drivers feel more alive and bold, leading to increased aggression in their driving style, which meant more sudden stops and starts, putting additional stress on the seat belts and causing them to malfunction. And last but not least, with the fresh air, drivers were more likely to unleash their inner divas and dramatically fling themselves into their cars, causing undue strain on the seat belts and triggering the recalls.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Hyper-realistic Brutalism Cyberpunk Futuristic
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. The increase in good air quality in Columbus, Indiana caused automotive recalls for seat belt issues to also increase because, as the air quality improved, people were more likely to roll down their windows and hang their arms out, feeling the breeze. Unfortunately, this led to a surge in reports of seat belt malfunctions, as the belts became tangled in the wind and tangled up the drivers, unintentionally preforming a type of seat belt tango. Additionally, the crisp, clean air made drivers feel more alive and bold, leading to increased aggression in their driving style, which meant more sudden stops and starts, putting additional stress on the seat belts and causing them to malfunction. And last but not least, with the fresh air, drivers were more likely to unleash their inner divas and dramatically fling themselves into their cars, causing undue strain on the seat belts and triggering the recalls.
ChatGPT: Imagine a sunny, clear day in Columbus, Indiana. The blue skies are a stark contrast to the usual pollution, as the air quality has noticeably improved. In this picture, you see car windows rolled down, and people happily hanging their arms out to feel the refreshing breeze. However, you also notice some trouble brewing. As the wind picks up, seat belts get tangled and twisted, causing various drivers to unintentionally tango with their own seat belts. Drivers suddenly become more aggressive, with sudden stops and starts, adding strain to their seat belts. You even notice a few dramatic moments as some drivers fling themselves into their cars, putting undue pressure on their seat belts. These scenes depict the unexpected consequences of the improved air quality, leading to a surge in automotive recalls for seat belt issues.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a sunny, clear day in Columbus, Indiana. The blue skies are a stark contrast to the usual pollution, as the air quality has noticeably improved. In this picture, you see car windows rolled down, and people happily hanging their arms out to feel the refreshing breeze. However, you also notice some trouble brewing. As the wind picks up, seat belts get tangled and twisted, causing various drivers to unintentionally tango with their own seat belts. Drivers suddenly become more aggressive, with sudden stops and starts, adding strain to their seat belts. You even notice a few dramatic moments as some drivers fling themselves into their cars, putting undue pressure on their seat belts. These scenes depict the unexpected consequences of the improved air quality, leading to a surge in automotive recalls for seat belt issues. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Certainly! Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic scene in Columbus, Indiana on a clear and sunny day. Show a contrast of blue skies against the improved air quality, with people happily hanging their arms out of car windows to feel the refreshing breeze. Illustrate the trouble brewing as the wind picks up, causing seat belts to tangle and twist, leading to unintended tango-like interactions between drivers and their seat belts. Some drivers appear to be more aggressive, making sudden stops and starts, putting strain on their seat belts. Capture dramatic moments where drivers fling themselves into their cars, putting undue pressure on their seat belts, while hinting at a surge in automotive recalls due to seat belt issues caused by the unexpected consequences of improved air quality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air quality in Columbus, Indiana positively influenced Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare

The Journal of Quirky Connections in Public Health

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Good air quality in Columbus, Indiana and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 and p < 0.01 for 1989 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for issues with seat belts. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning from 1989 to 2022, our research team delved into this correlation, and the findings are nothing to buckle at. Our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01, highlighting the surprising relationship between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls.

On a different note, we were amused to find that the data suggests a tight connection between clean air and seat belt repairs. It seems that in Columbus, when the air is clean, automakers feel compelled to "buckle up" for more recalls. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such an unexpected association, and we're confident that our findings will spark further research and a valuable conversation among automakers and environmentalists alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Good air quality in Columbus, Indiana and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for issues with seat belts. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning from 1989 to 2022, our research team delved into this correlation, and the findings are nothing to buckle at. Our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01, highlighting the surprising relationship between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls.

On a different note, we were amused to find that the data suggests a tight connection between clean air and seat belt repairs. It seems that in Columbus, when the air is clean, automakers feel compelled to "buckle up" for more recalls. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such an unexpected association, and we're confident that our findings will spark further research and a valuable conversation among automakers and environmentalists alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of automotive safety recalls is a buckle-y place, filled with twists, turns, and hopefully, secure seat belts. Likewise, the realm of environmental quality is no walk in the park, though hopefully, there are fewer exhaust fumes to contend with. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between good air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and the occurrence of automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's a topic that's sure to leave you breathless, and not just because of the clean air.

When it comes to the intersection of clean air and seat belt repairs, one might expect the connection to be as thin as a seat belt strap. However, our findings suggest otherwise. It seems that the correlation between the two is not merely an "air-y" fairy tale, but a statistically significant and thought-provoking reality. It's like finding out that a breath of fresh air can lead to a flurry of seat belt fixes - who would have thought?

We're not just pulling these links out of thin air; our research is firmly grounded in extensive data analysis. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning over three decades, we have unraveled a noteworthy correlation that is nothing to sneeze at. It's as though the automotive industry and clean air are engaged in a dance, where every breath of fresh air prompts the music to "recall" for more seat belt issues. Who knew that environmental quality could lead to such a "revolting" development in the automotive world?

Stay tuned for the statistical findings from our investigation, as we uncover just how closely intertwined the state of the air and the state of seat belt recalls are in Columbus, Indiana. It's a tale of unexpected connections and statistical intrigue that's sure to leave you wanting to "air out" more of these surprising revelations in future research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Good air quality in Columbus, Indiana and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for issues with seat belts. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning from 1989 to 2022, our research team delved into this correlation, and the findings are nothing to buckle at. Our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01, highlighting the surprising relationship between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls.

On a different note, we were amused to find that the data suggests a tight connection between clean air and seat belt repairs. It seems that in Columbus, when the air is clean, automakers feel compelled to "buckle up" for more recalls. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such an unexpected association, and we're confident that our findings will spark further research and a valuable conversation among automakers and environmentalists alike.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of automotive safety recalls is a buckle-y place, filled with twists, turns, and hopefully, secure seat belts. Likewise, the realm of environmental quality is no walk in the park, though hopefully, there are fewer exhaust fumes to contend with. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between good air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and the occurrence of automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's a topic that's sure to leave you breathless, and not just because of the clean air.
When it comes to the intersection of clean air and seat belt repairs, one might expect the connection to be as thin as a seat belt strap. However, our findings suggest otherwise. It seems that the correlation between the two is not merely an "air-y" fairy tale, but a statistically significant and thought-provoking reality. It's like finding out that a breath of fresh air can lead to a flurry of seat belt fixes - who would have thought?
We're not just pulling these links out of thin air; our research is firmly grounded in extensive data analysis. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning over three decades, we have unraveled a noteworthy correlation that is nothing to sneeze at. It's as though the automotive industry and clean air are engaged in a dance, where every breath of fresh air prompts the music to "recall" for more seat belt issues. Who knew that environmental quality could lead to such a "revolting" development in the automotive world?
Stay tuned for the statistical findings from our investigation, as we uncover just how closely intertwined the state of the air and the state of seat belt recalls are in Columbus, Indiana. It's a tale of unexpected connections and statistical intrigue that's sure to leave you wanting to "air out" more of these surprising revelations in future research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Investigating the curious link between air quality and automotive recalls in Columbus, Indiana, requires a thorough review of existing literature. Smith and Doe (2015) observed a positive correlation between air quality index and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. This initial study laid the foundation for further exploration into the unexpected association between environmental factors and automotive safety concerns.

The findings of Jones et al. (2018) echoed the surprising connection, emphasizing the significance of environmental factors on automotive safety. They speculated that cleaner air might lead to increased scrutiny of vehicle safety features, including seat belts, by regulatory authorities. This line of inquiry entertained the notion that "fresh air" could serve as a catalyst for automotive manufacturers to address seat belt issues with heightened urgency.

Speaking of "heightened urgency," it reminds me of the time I tried to fix my seat belt. It was an "emergency," you could say. I even considered making a "belt buckle" out of spare parts, but I decided it was "unfasten-ate" for that.

As we shift gears to broaden the scope of our review, it's essential to consider non-fiction works that shed light on the automotive industry and environmental influences. "Green Wheels: The Intersection of Environmental Responsibility and Automotive Innovation" by Environmentalist & Motorist (2017) provides insights into the complex interplay of environmental sustainability and automotive design. The book offers a comprehensive analysis of the impact of clean air initiatives on vehicle safety standards, hinting at potential implications for seat belt recalls.

In a similar vein, "Drive Safe, Breathe Easy: A Novel Approach to Automotive Environmentalism" by Clean Air Crusader (2019) delves into the relationships between air quality and automotive safety, albeit from a more activist perspective. The author's passionate advocacy for vehicular environmental responsibility intertwines with discussions of safety features, leading readers to ponder the unforeseen confluence of air quality and seat belt recalls.

Turning to the realm of fiction, one cannot overlook the timeless classic "The Seat Belt Mystery" by Author Swift (2005). While a work of fiction, this gripping tale of automotive intrigue and safety conundrums captivates readers with its exploration of seat belt malfunctions in a town eerily reminiscent of Columbus, Indiana. As the protagonist unravels the enigma of seat belt failures, unsuspected forces of environmental purity come into play, adding a layer of complexity to the narrative that mirrors our research findings.

"Airborne Adventures: A Novel of Environmental Discovery" by Fictional Author (2013) provides a whimsical yet oddly relevant perspective on the interplay between air quality and automotive anomalies. Within the narrative, eccentric characters stumble upon unexpected correlations between air purity and vehicular malfunctions, drawing eerie parallels to our own empirical revelations regarding clean air and seat belt recalls.

In the digital age, social media platforms have become rich sources of anecdotal evidence and informal discourse regarding seemingly unrelated phenomena. A tweet by @CarEnthusiast2021 suggested, "Breath of clean air, buckle up for seat belt recalls – coincidence or cosmic conspiracy? #AutomotiveMysteries #CleanAirConnections." While lighthearted in tone, such social media musings mirror the underlying curiosity and intrigue that our research seeks to unravel, albeit with a touch of Internet humor and conjecture.

So, there you have it, a brief foray into the literature landscape surrounding the unexpected correlation between clean air and seat belt recalls in Columbus, Indiana. As we progress with our investigation, let us keep in mind that the academic pursuit of knowledge can also be an exhilarating journey filled with humor and unexpected connections. After all, who knew that air quality and seat belt repairs could make for such an "un-belt-lievably" captivating study?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Good air quality in Columbus, Indiana and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT . You used data from 1989 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for issues with seat belts. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning from 1989 to 2022, our research team delved into this correlation, and the findings are nothing to buckle at. Our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01, highlighting the surprising relationship between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls.

On a different note, we were amused to find that the data suggests a tight connection between clean air and seat belt repairs. It seems that in Columbus, when the air is clean, automakers feel compelled to "buckle up" for more recalls. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such an unexpected association, and we're confident that our findings will spark further research and a valuable conversation among automakers and environmentalists alike.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of automotive safety recalls is a buckle-y place, filled with twists, turns, and hopefully, secure seat belts. Likewise, the realm of environmental quality is no walk in the park, though hopefully, there are fewer exhaust fumes to contend with. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between good air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and the occurrence of automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's a topic that's sure to leave you breathless, and not just because of the clean air.
When it comes to the intersection of clean air and seat belt repairs, one might expect the connection to be as thin as a seat belt strap. However, our findings suggest otherwise. It seems that the correlation between the two is not merely an "air-y" fairy tale, but a statistically significant and thought-provoking reality. It's like finding out that a breath of fresh air can lead to a flurry of seat belt fixes - who would have thought?
We're not just pulling these links out of thin air; our research is firmly grounded in extensive data analysis. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning over three decades, we have unraveled a noteworthy correlation that is nothing to sneeze at. It's as though the automotive industry and clean air are engaged in a dance, where every breath of fresh air prompts the music to "recall" for more seat belt issues. Who knew that environmental quality could lead to such a "revolting" development in the automotive world?
Stay tuned for the statistical findings from our investigation, as we uncover just how closely intertwined the state of the air and the state of seat belt recalls are in Columbus, Indiana. It's a tale of unexpected connections and statistical intrigue that's sure to leave you wanting to "air out" more of these surprising revelations in future research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the enigmatic connection between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls, our methodology was as strategic and methodical as planning a road trip with a GPS and a backseat full of snacks. We began by gathering publicly available data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation, carefully sifting through the sea of information like archeologists on a quest for hidden treasures—though in this case, our treasures were correlation coefficients and p-values, not ancient artifacts.

Our team utilized a time-series analysis approach, aiming to capture the dynamic nature of air quality and automotive recall data from 1989 to 2022. This method allowed us to detect any temporal patterns and trends, ensuring that we didn't miss any unexpected detours in the relationship between air quality and seat belt recalls. It's safe to say that we were "air-odynamic" in our approach, steering clear of any statistical potholes or data roadblocks.

Now, for the technical maneuvering: we employed various statistical techniques, including autocorrelation analysis, generalized additive models, and even a sprinkle of multivariate regression models for good measure. It was like conducting a symphony orchestra, with each statistical method playing a different instrument in the harmonious melody of data analysis. We wanted to ensure that our analysis was as robust and comprehensive as a well-built car seat—no loose ends, no wobbly results.

Speaking of tight results, a dad joke on air quality: Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired from all the fresh air in Columbus, Indiana! Just like a good joke, our methodology was a blend of precision and levity—after all, even serious research can benefit from a dash of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Good air quality in Columbus, Indiana and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT .

For the time period 1989 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7050781, r-squared of 0.4971352, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for issues with seat belts. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning from 1989 to 2022, our research team delved into this correlation, and the findings are nothing to buckle at. Our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01, highlighting the surprising relationship between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls.

On a different note, we were amused to find that the data suggests a tight connection between clean air and seat belt repairs. It seems that in Columbus, when the air is clean, automakers feel compelled to "buckle up" for more recalls. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such an unexpected association, and we're confident that our findings will spark further research and a valuable conversation among automakers and environmentalists alike.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of automotive safety recalls is a buckle-y place, filled with twists, turns, and hopefully, secure seat belts. Likewise, the realm of environmental quality is no walk in the park, though hopefully, there are fewer exhaust fumes to contend with. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between good air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and the occurrence of automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's a topic that's sure to leave you breathless, and not just because of the clean air.
When it comes to the intersection of clean air and seat belt repairs, one might expect the connection to be as thin as a seat belt strap. However, our findings suggest otherwise. It seems that the correlation between the two is not merely an "air-y" fairy tale, but a statistically significant and thought-provoking reality. It's like finding out that a breath of fresh air can lead to a flurry of seat belt fixes - who would have thought?
We're not just pulling these links out of thin air; our research is firmly grounded in extensive data analysis. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning over three decades, we have unraveled a noteworthy correlation that is nothing to sneeze at. It's as though the automotive industry and clean air are engaged in a dance, where every breath of fresh air prompts the music to "recall" for more seat belt issues. Who knew that environmental quality could lead to such a "revolting" development in the automotive world?
Stay tuned for the statistical findings from our investigation, as we uncover just how closely intertwined the state of the air and the state of seat belt recalls are in Columbus, Indiana. It's a tale of unexpected connections and statistical intrigue that's sure to leave you wanting to "air out" more of these surprising revelations in future research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 between air quality and automotive seat belt recalls in Columbus, Indiana. This finding suggests a relatively strong positive relationship between the two variables. It's like finding out that good air quality and seat belt recalls are "buckle-y" intertwined in a way that's hard to ignore.

The calculated r-squared value of 0.4971352 further supports the notion that changes in air quality are closely associated with automotive recalls for seat belt issues. This level of variability explained is nothing to sneeze at (but maybe we should, considering the air quality). It's as if the cleaner the air, the more likely we are to "strap in" for an increase in seat belt recalls. It seems that Columbus, Indiana, has become a breeding ground for these unexpected associations!

We found the correlation to be statistically significant with p < 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this association occurring by random chance is highly unlikely. It's like discovering a hidden treasure map in a statistical analysis - the likelihood of it being a random doodle is slim to none.

Our findings are summarized in Fig. 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust positive relationship between air quality and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's like two peas in a pod, only one pea is air quality and the other is seat belt recalls. Who would have thought that these two seemingly unrelated components could fit together so snugly?

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a striking correlation between good air quality and a higher incidence of automotive recalls for seat belt issues in Columbus, Indiana. It's a reminder that unexpected connections can be found in the most unlikely of places, much like a dad joke in the midst of academic research. This revelation opens the door for further exploration into the potential mechanisms driving this peculiar relationship and its implications for automotive safety and environmental quality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Good air quality in Columbus, Indiana and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for issues with seat belts. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning from 1989 to 2022, our research team delved into this correlation, and the findings are nothing to buckle at. Our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01, highlighting the surprising relationship between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls.

On a different note, we were amused to find that the data suggests a tight connection between clean air and seat belt repairs. It seems that in Columbus, when the air is clean, automakers feel compelled to "buckle up" for more recalls. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such an unexpected association, and we're confident that our findings will spark further research and a valuable conversation among automakers and environmentalists alike.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Investigating the curious link between air quality and automotive recalls in Columbus, Indiana, requires a thorough review of existing literature. Smith and Doe (2015) observed a positive correlation between air quality index and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. This initial study laid the foundation for further exploration into the unexpected association between environmental factors and automotive safety concerns.
The findings of Jones et al. (2018) echoed the surprising connection, emphasizing the significance of environmental factors on automotive safety. They speculated that cleaner air might lead to increased scrutiny of vehicle safety features, including seat belts, by regulatory authorities. This line of inquiry entertained the notion that "fresh air" could serve as a catalyst for automotive manufacturers to address seat belt issues with heightened urgency.
Speaking of "heightened urgency," it reminds me of the time I tried to fix my seat belt. It was an "emergency," you could say. I even considered making a "belt buckle" out of spare parts, but I decided it was "unfasten-ate" for that.

As we shift gears to broaden the scope of our review, it's essential to consider non-fiction works that shed light on the automotive industry and environmental influences. "Green Wheels: The Intersection of Environmental Responsibility and Automotive Innovation" by Environmentalist & Motorist (2017) provides insights into the complex interplay of environmental sustainability and automotive design. The book offers a comprehensive analysis of the impact of clean air initiatives on vehicle safety standards, hinting at potential implications for seat belt recalls.
In a similar vein, "Drive Safe, Breathe Easy: A Novel Approach to Automotive Environmentalism" by Clean Air Crusader (2019) delves into the relationships between air quality and automotive safety, albeit from a more activist perspective. The author's passionate advocacy for vehicular environmental responsibility intertwines with discussions of safety features, leading readers to ponder the unforeseen confluence of air quality and seat belt recalls.
Turning to the realm of fiction, one cannot overlook the timeless classic "The Seat Belt Mystery" by Author Swift (2005). While a work of fiction, this gripping tale of automotive intrigue and safety conundrums captivates readers with its exploration of seat belt malfunctions in a town eerily reminiscent of Columbus, Indiana. As the protagonist unravels the enigma of seat belt failures, unsuspected forces of environmental purity come into play, adding a layer of complexity to the narrative that mirrors our research findings.
"Airborne Adventures: A Novel of Environmental Discovery" by Fictional Author (2013) provides a whimsical yet oddly relevant perspective on the interplay between air quality and automotive anomalies. Within the narrative, eccentric characters stumble upon unexpected correlations between air purity and vehicular malfunctions, drawing eerie parallels to our own empirical revelations regarding clean air and seat belt recalls.
In the digital age, social media platforms have become rich sources of anecdotal evidence and informal discourse regarding seemingly unrelated phenomena. A tweet by @CarEnthusiast2021 suggested, "Breath of clean air, buckle up for seat belt recalls – coincidence or cosmic conspiracy? #AutomotiveMysteries #CleanAirConnections." While lighthearted in tone, such social media musings mirror the underlying curiosity and intrigue that our research seeks to unravel, albeit with a touch of Internet humor and conjecture.
So, there you have it, a brief foray into the literature landscape surrounding the unexpected correlation between clean air and seat belt recalls in Columbus, Indiana. As we progress with our investigation, let us keep in mind that the academic pursuit of knowledge can also be an exhilarating journey filled with humor and unexpected connections. After all, who knew that air quality and seat belt repairs could make for such an "un-belt-lievably" captivating study?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 between air quality and automotive seat belt recalls in Columbus, Indiana. This finding suggests a relatively strong positive relationship between the two variables. It's like finding out that good air quality and seat belt recalls are "buckle-y" intertwined in a way that's hard to ignore.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.4971352 further supports the notion that changes in air quality are closely associated with automotive recalls for seat belt issues. This level of variability explained is nothing to sneeze at (but maybe we should, considering the air quality). It's as if the cleaner the air, the more likely we are to "strap in" for an increase in seat belt recalls. It seems that Columbus, Indiana, has become a breeding ground for these unexpected associations!
We found the correlation to be statistically significant with p < 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this association occurring by random chance is highly unlikely. It's like discovering a hidden treasure map in a statistical analysis - the likelihood of it being a random doodle is slim to none.
Our findings are summarized in Fig. 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust positive relationship between air quality and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's like two peas in a pod, only one pea is air quality and the other is seat belt recalls. Who would have thought that these two seemingly unrelated components could fit together so snugly?
In conclusion, our research has unveiled a striking correlation between good air quality and a higher incidence of automotive recalls for seat belt issues in Columbus, Indiana. It's a reminder that unexpected connections can be found in the most unlikely of places, much like a dad joke in the midst of academic research. This revelation opens the door for further exploration into the potential mechanisms driving this peculiar relationship and its implications for automotive safety and environmental quality.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have provided compelling evidence for the association between good air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. Our findings align with previous research by Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones et al. (2018) that highlighted the unexpected connection between air quality and automotive safety concerns. It's as if the whisper of clean air is causing a statistical uproar in the realm of automotive safety - quite a breath-taking revelation!

The significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781, with a p-value of less than 0.01, firmly supports the notion that when the air is cleaner in Columbus, automakers are more likely to recall vehicles for seat belt issues. The findings almost seem like a dad joke - how does clean air affect seat belts? It helps them "air out" their problems! Yet, the statistical evidence presents a serious and substantial relationship, suggesting that the quality of the air in Columbus may indeed influence automakers' decisions regarding seat belt safety.

The correlation is robust, as indicated by the calculated r-squared value of 0.4971352, revealing that nearly 50% of the variability in automotive seat belt recalls can be attributed to changes in air quality. It's as if the air quality is playing a prominent role in nudging automakers to tighten their grip on seat belt safety - a "belt-tightening" strategy, if you will. The statistical significance of our findings raises intriguing questions about the underlying mechanisms driving this relationship and prompts further investigation into the potential influence of environmental factors on automotive safety measures.

Our study offers a unique contribution to the growing body of research on environmental influences on automotive safety, emphasizing the need for automakers and regulatory authorities to consider the interplay between air quality and vehicle safety features. It's like finding hidden humor in a complex statistical analysis – the unexpected correlation between clean air and seat belt recalls has presented itself as a "statistically significant punchline," sparking a fresh perspective on the partnership between environmental conditions and automotive safety.

The implications of our findings are far-reaching, serving as a call to action for automakers and environmentalists to collaboratively explore the potential effects of air quality on vehicle safety standards. It's akin to recognizing the subtle humor in a serious situation - the unexpected connection between good air quality and increased seat belt recalls has shone a light on the need for comprehensive investigations into the intricate relationship between environmental factors and automotive safety. The air quality in Columbus, Indiana, is certainly "pulling its weight" in influencing automotive safety practices – a pun-intended revelation that elevates the discourse on vehicular safety and environmental responsibility.

In light of our results, it is imperative to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected association and explore avenues for enhancing automotive safety measures in environments with varying air quality. It's almost as if the statistical analysis has uncovered a "belt of truth" – a sobering yet surprisingly humorous insight into the interconnectedness of environmental purity and automotive recalls. This investigation sets the stage for future research endeavors seeking to unravel the intricate dance between air quality and automotive safety, paving the way for a refreshing and lively dialogue among stakeholders.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Good air quality in Columbus, Indiana and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for issues with seat belts. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning from 1989 to 2022, our research team delved into this correlation, and the findings are nothing to buckle at. Our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01, highlighting the surprising relationship between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls.

On a different note, we were amused to find that the data suggests a tight connection between clean air and seat belt repairs. It seems that in Columbus, when the air is clean, automakers feel compelled to "buckle up" for more recalls. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such an unexpected association, and we're confident that our findings will spark further research and a valuable conversation among automakers and environmentalists alike.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of automotive safety recalls is a buckle-y place, filled with twists, turns, and hopefully, secure seat belts. Likewise, the realm of environmental quality is no walk in the park, though hopefully, there are fewer exhaust fumes to contend with. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between good air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and the occurrence of automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's a topic that's sure to leave you breathless, and not just because of the clean air.
When it comes to the intersection of clean air and seat belt repairs, one might expect the connection to be as thin as a seat belt strap. However, our findings suggest otherwise. It seems that the correlation between the two is not merely an "air-y" fairy tale, but a statistically significant and thought-provoking reality. It's like finding out that a breath of fresh air can lead to a flurry of seat belt fixes - who would have thought?
We're not just pulling these links out of thin air; our research is firmly grounded in extensive data analysis. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning over three decades, we have unraveled a noteworthy correlation that is nothing to sneeze at. It's as though the automotive industry and clean air are engaged in a dance, where every breath of fresh air prompts the music to "recall" for more seat belt issues. Who knew that environmental quality could lead to such a "revolting" development in the automotive world?
Stay tuned for the statistical findings from our investigation, as we uncover just how closely intertwined the state of the air and the state of seat belt recalls are in Columbus, Indiana. It's a tale of unexpected connections and statistical intrigue that's sure to leave you wanting to "air out" more of these surprising revelations in future research.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 between air quality and automotive seat belt recalls in Columbus, Indiana. This finding suggests a relatively strong positive relationship between the two variables. It's like finding out that good air quality and seat belt recalls are "buckle-y" intertwined in a way that's hard to ignore.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.4971352 further supports the notion that changes in air quality are closely associated with automotive recalls for seat belt issues. This level of variability explained is nothing to sneeze at (but maybe we should, considering the air quality). It's as if the cleaner the air, the more likely we are to "strap in" for an increase in seat belt recalls. It seems that Columbus, Indiana, has become a breeding ground for these unexpected associations!
We found the correlation to be statistically significant with p < 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this association occurring by random chance is highly unlikely. It's like discovering a hidden treasure map in a statistical analysis - the likelihood of it being a random doodle is slim to none.
Our findings are summarized in Fig. 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust positive relationship between air quality and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's like two peas in a pod, only one pea is air quality and the other is seat belt recalls. Who would have thought that these two seemingly unrelated components could fit together so snugly?
In conclusion, our research has unveiled a striking correlation between good air quality and a higher incidence of automotive recalls for seat belt issues in Columbus, Indiana. It's a reminder that unexpected connections can be found in the most unlikely of places, much like a dad joke in the midst of academic research. This revelation opens the door for further exploration into the potential mechanisms driving this peculiar relationship and its implications for automotive safety and environmental quality.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our study has shed light on the surprising link between good air quality and increased automotive recalls for seat belt issues in Columbus, Indiana. It seems that when the air is cleaner, automakers feel the need to "buckle up" for more recalls - a correlation that's as tight as a well-fastened seat belt! These findings not only provide statistical significance but also serve as a breath of fresh air in the realm of unexpected connections.

The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01 suggests that this relationship is no mere coincidence. It's like finding out that a breath of fresh air can lead to a flurry of seat belt fixes – talk about an 'air-raising' revelation!

The r-squared value of 0.4971352 further reinforces the strength of this association. This variability explained is nothing to sneeze at, although one might consider doing so considering the good air quality in Columbus.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts this robust positive relationship between air quality and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. It's like witnessing a harmonious duet between air quality and seat belt recalls - a surprising union that demands further exploration.

In closing, these findings provide a 'belt-tightening' revelation that challenges conventional wisdom in both automotive safety and environmental quality. It seems that when it comes to Columbus, Indiana, good air quality and seat belt recalls are inextricably linked – a connection as 'unexpected' as finding a dad joke in an academic paper.

At the risk of being a 'dad' myself, it's time to fasten our seat belts and embrace the surprising nature of our results. Further research in this area may yield valuable insights, but for now, it's safe to say that no additional explorations required - we've 'strapped in' to this topic enough!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Connections in Public Health


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Transportation and Environmental Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled In Columbus Clean Air and Seatbelt Repair: A Connection That's Rare with an abstract of This study investigates the intriguing link between air quality in Columbus, Indiana, and automotive recalls for issues with seat belts. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning from 1989 to 2022, our research team delved into this correlation, and the findings are nothing to buckle at. Our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7050781 with p < 0.01, highlighting the surprising relationship between good air quality and automotive seat belt recalls.
On a different note, we were amused to find that the data suggests a tight connection between clean air and seat belt repairs. It seems that in Columbus, when the air is clean, automakers feel compelled to "buckle up" for more recalls. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such an unexpected association, and we're confident that our findings will spark further research and a valuable conversation among automakers and environmentalists alike.

ChatGPT:

Columbus Indiana, air quality, automotive recalls, seat belts, Environmental Protection Agency, US Department of Transportation, correlation coefficient, clean air, automakers, research, unexpected association, environmentalists, automakers, automotive industry, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Columbus, Indiana
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Columbus, IN
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Columbus, Indiana

Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts

Correlation r = 0.7050781 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4971352 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 49.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Columbus, Indiana) over the 34 years from 1989 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.2E-6. 0.0000032272502158018250000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.71 in 0.00032% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 309,861 random variables You don't actually need 309 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 33 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 33 because we have two variables measured over a period of 34 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.48, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air quality in Columbus, Indiana (Good air quality)0.7635470.6250000000000.9465650.95045000000000000.8177570.7225270.6657530.7814210.8626370.7945210.8186810.8825140.8324180.868493
Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts (Recalls)212521151511302424131042382419387111411415101024382726382421424631




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.763547,0.625,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.946565,0.95045,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.817757,0.722527,0.665753,0.781421,0.862637,0.794521,0.818681,0.882514,0.832418,0.868493,])
array_2 = np.array([21,25,21,15,15,11,30,24,24,13,10,42,38,24,19,38,7,11,14,11,4,15,10,10,24,38,27,26,38,24,21,42,46,31,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Columbus, Indiana"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 1168 · Black Variable ID: 22077 · Red Variable ID: 1106
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0