about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,159 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1979 to 2011, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of successful Mount Everest climbs rises, so does the peak appetite for adventure. This, in turn, creates a sausage-yetis-faction where competitors are relishing the thrill of the challenge like never before, and they're on a roll to claim the title. It's a summit showdown of epic proportions, where each contender is truly reaching their peak performance. And as we all know, when it comes to devouring those dogs, these champions don't just climb, they condiment.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie] In a bustling town square, a group of jubilant mountain climbers in colorful gear gather in a circle, holding their summit certificates aloft and cheering with joy. Their vibrant climbing gear stands out against the snowy backdrop, and their beaming smiles reflect their sense of accomplishment. Just a few feet away, a crowd has gathered around a hot dog eating contest. The participants are in the midst of the contest, their eager expressions conveying their competitive spirit. The winner, a confident competitor with a determined gaze, triumphantly raises a golden trophy overhead as confetti flies around, and the crowd erupts in cheers. The strange yet captivating link between high-altitude accomplishments and competitive eating success is emphasized by the juxtaposition of these scenes, creating a whimsical and engaging visual narrative. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Rising Mount Everest Successes Linked to Hot Dog Eating Championship Win: Climbers' High Altitude Appetite Boosts Competitive Eater's Victory!". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Futuristic An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Brutalism Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "Rising Mount Everest Successes Linked to Hot Dog Eating Championship Win: Climbers' High Altitude Appetite Boosts Competitive Eater's Victory!"
ChatGPT: In a bustling town square, a group of jubilant mountain climbers in colorful gear celebrate their successful ascent of Mount Everest. They proudly display their summit certificates and high-five each other, beaming with pride. Just a few feet away, a hot dog eating contest is in full swing, with participants chomping down on hot dogs at a rapid pace. The winner, a confident competitor, raises a golden trophy overhead, while a cheering crowd surrounds them. The sight of the jubilant climbers and the victorious hot dog eater seem to be somehow connected, showing a bizarre yet intriguing link between high-altitude accomplishments and competitive eating success.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town square, a group of jubilant mountain climbers in colorful gear celebrate their successful ascent of Mount Everest. They proudly display their summit certificates and high-five each other, beaming with pride. Just a few feet away, a hot dog eating contest is in full swing, with participants chomping down on hot dogs at a rapid pace. The winner, a confident competitor, raises a golden trophy overhead, while a cheering crowd surrounds them. The sight of the jubilant climbers and the victorious hot dog eater seem to be somehow connected, showing a bizarre yet intriguing link between high-altitude accomplishments and competitive eating success. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie] In a bustling town square, a group of jubilant mountain climbers in colorful gear gather in a circle, holding their summit certificates aloft and cheering with joy. Their vibrant climbing gear stands out against the snowy backdrop, and their beaming smiles reflect their sense of accomplishment. Just a few feet away, a crowd has gathered around a hot dog eating contest. The participants are in the midst of the contest, their eager expressions conveying their competitive spirit. The winner, a confident competitor with a determined gaze, triumphantly raises a golden trophy overhead as confetti flies around, and the crowd erupts in cheers. The strange yet captivating link between high-altitude accomplishments and competitive eating success is emphasized by the juxtaposition of these scenes, creating a whimsical and engaging visual narrative.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

The Journal of Extreme Altitude Gastroenterology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from CBC and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and p < 0.01 for 1979 to 2011.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Despite being seemingly unrelated, our research aims to uncover the tantalizing connection between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through a painstaking analysis of CBC and Wikipedia data from 1979 to 2011, we identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and statistically significant p < 0.01. This unexpected correlation begs the question: are these champions fueling their competitive hunger with their eyes set on conquering new summits, or are they driven by a desire to scale new personal heights in gastronomic prowess? Our findings shed light on an intriguing, yet slightly absurd, link between two seemingly unrelated achievements, offering a unique perspective on human motivation and performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Despite being seemingly unrelated, our research aims to uncover the tantalizing connection between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through a painstaking analysis of CBC and Wikipedia data from 1979 to 2011, we identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and statistically significant p < 0.01. This unexpected correlation begs the question: are these champions fueling their competitive hunger with their eyes set on conquering new summits, or are they driven by a desire to scale new personal heights in gastronomic prowess? Our findings shed light on an intriguing, yet slightly absurd, link between two seemingly unrelated achievements, offering a unique perspective on human motivation and performance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

In the world of academia, we often find ourselves delving into the most curious and unexpected connections. From the influence of economic policies on public health to the impact of climate change on agricultural production, the intersections between seemingly disparate fields never fail to surprise and intrigue. Our latest venture into the realm of research has led us down a path that is as fascinating as it is, well, stomach-churning.

The focal point of our study? The improbable relationship between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the insatiable consumption of hotdogs by the mighty champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, you read that correctly. We are embarking on an exploration that spans from the heights of the world's tallest peak to the depths of gastrointestinal endurance. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated feats, and yes, it may very well leave you feeling a bit peckish and puzzled at the same time.

As scholars and seekers of knowledge, we are all too familiar with the pursuit of understanding the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. Yet, when faced with the rather surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 between these two entities, we were left pondering the age-old question: what on earth could possibly be the link between summiting the Roof of the World and gorging on hotdogs? And dare we say, buckle up, for the puns are sure to follow!

Through a rigorous examination of data spanning from 1979 to 2011, encompassing both the triumphs atop Everest and the triumphs of gluttony at Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest, we are poised to shed light on this peculiar correlation. So, grab a snack (preferably something non-competitive-eating-related), as we embark on a journey that may leave you simultaneously scratching your head and craving a hotdog – or perhaps a hotdog while scratching your head. Let's take a bite out of this rather unconventional conundrum and see where it leads us!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Despite being seemingly unrelated, our research aims to uncover the tantalizing connection between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through a painstaking analysis of CBC and Wikipedia data from 1979 to 2011, we identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and statistically significant p < 0.01. This unexpected correlation begs the question: are these champions fueling their competitive hunger with their eyes set on conquering new summits, or are they driven by a desire to scale new personal heights in gastronomic prowess? Our findings shed light on an intriguing, yet slightly absurd, link between two seemingly unrelated achievements, offering a unique perspective on human motivation and performance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the world of academia, we often find ourselves delving into the most curious and unexpected connections. From the influence of economic policies on public health to the impact of climate change on agricultural production, the intersections between seemingly disparate fields never fail to surprise and intrigue. Our latest venture into the realm of research has led us down a path that is as fascinating as it is, well, stomach-churning.
The focal point of our study? The improbable relationship between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the insatiable consumption of hotdogs by the mighty champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, you read that correctly. We are embarking on an exploration that spans from the heights of the world's tallest peak to the depths of gastrointestinal endurance. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated feats, and yes, it may very well leave you feeling a bit peckish and puzzled at the same time.
As scholars and seekers of knowledge, we are all too familiar with the pursuit of understanding the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. Yet, when faced with the rather surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 between these two entities, we were left pondering the age-old question: what on earth could possibly be the link between summiting the Roof of the World and gorging on hotdogs? And dare we say, buckle up, for the puns are sure to follow!
Through a rigorous examination of data spanning from 1979 to 2011, encompassing both the triumphs atop Everest and the triumphs of gluttony at Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest, we are poised to shed light on this peculiar correlation. So, grab a snack (preferably something non-competitive-eating-related), as we embark on a journey that may leave you simultaneously scratching your head and craving a hotdog – or perhaps a hotdog while scratching your head. Let's take a bite out of this rather unconventional conundrum and see where it leads us!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
LITERATURE REVIEW

In "Summiting Success: Mount Everest Triumphs and Their Implications for Human Achievement," Smith and Doe delve into the realm of mountaineering accomplishments, analyzing the factors that contribute to successful ascents of the world's highest peak. While their study primarily focuses on the physical and mental endurance required for such feats, it inadvertently piques the curiosity about the potential influence of unconventional forms of sustenance on climbers' performance. Little did they know that a few thousand feet below, on the streets of Coney Island, another form of triumph was unfolding – one involving not the conquering of natural heights, but the devouring of hotdogs at a remarkable pace.

Moving from the scholarly world of Smith and Doe, we traverse into an unexpected literary landscape with "The Fine Art of Competitive Eating: Indulgence in the Modern Era" by Jones. This book provides a comprehensive exploration of the history and culture surrounding competitive eating, detailing the awe-inspiring feats accomplished by champions of various food-centric contests. While the author's focus remains on the broader context of competitive eating, the peculiar correlation between individuals' capacity for consuming copious amounts of hotdogs and their proclivity for scaling treacherous mountains becomes an alluring thread in the complex tapestry of gastronomic achievements.

As we pivot from academic studies and non-fiction books to works of fiction, the tone of our exploration takes a whimsical turn. Enter "Peak Appetite: Gastronomic Grandeur and the Pursuit of Alpine Feats" by Lorem and Ipsum, a deliciously entertaining novel that weaves together the narratives of a hotdog-eating prodigy and an aspiring mountaineer. While the characters' paths initially appear distinct, the plot twists and turns to reveal a surprising interplay between their seemingly incongruous passions.

Now, turning to some rather unexpected sources of insight, we stumble upon social media musings that offer quirky perspectives on the subject matter at hand. A tweet by @HotdogHiker speculates, "Are hotdogs the ultimate fuel for conquering Everest? Asking for a friend – and possibly for my next meal." This lighthearted inquiry introduces an element of humor into the otherwise serious discourse regarding the potential link between gastrointestinal feats and alpine triumphs.

Stay tuned for the unexpected punchlines as we take a comedic detour amidst the scholarly pursuit of uncovering the tantalizing connection between gastronomic marvels and mountainous conquests!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from CBC and Wikipedia . You used data from 1979 to 2011

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Despite being seemingly unrelated, our research aims to uncover the tantalizing connection between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through a painstaking analysis of CBC and Wikipedia data from 1979 to 2011, we identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and statistically significant p < 0.01. This unexpected correlation begs the question: are these champions fueling their competitive hunger with their eyes set on conquering new summits, or are they driven by a desire to scale new personal heights in gastronomic prowess? Our findings shed light on an intriguing, yet slightly absurd, link between two seemingly unrelated achievements, offering a unique perspective on human motivation and performance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the world of academia, we often find ourselves delving into the most curious and unexpected connections. From the influence of economic policies on public health to the impact of climate change on agricultural production, the intersections between seemingly disparate fields never fail to surprise and intrigue. Our latest venture into the realm of research has led us down a path that is as fascinating as it is, well, stomach-churning.
The focal point of our study? The improbable relationship between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the insatiable consumption of hotdogs by the mighty champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, you read that correctly. We are embarking on an exploration that spans from the heights of the world's tallest peak to the depths of gastrointestinal endurance. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated feats, and yes, it may very well leave you feeling a bit peckish and puzzled at the same time.
As scholars and seekers of knowledge, we are all too familiar with the pursuit of understanding the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. Yet, when faced with the rather surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 between these two entities, we were left pondering the age-old question: what on earth could possibly be the link between summiting the Roof of the World and gorging on hotdogs? And dare we say, buckle up, for the puns are sure to follow!
Through a rigorous examination of data spanning from 1979 to 2011, encompassing both the triumphs atop Everest and the triumphs of gluttony at Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest, we are poised to shed light on this peculiar correlation. So, grab a snack (preferably something non-competitive-eating-related), as we embark on a journey that may leave you simultaneously scratching your head and craving a hotdog – or perhaps a hotdog while scratching your head. Let's take a bite out of this rather unconventional conundrum and see where it leads us!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection and Preprocessing
As the saying goes, sometimes you have to climb a few mountains to find the perfect hotdog. In the case of our research, climbing mountains was more of a metaphorical pursuit, but the hunt for data was just as thrilling. Our intrepid team scoured the depths of the internet, navigating the treacherous terrains of online databases and websites, with a keen eye for any information related to successful Mount Everest ascents and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions. While the internet can be a vast and often perplexing jungle of information, we managed to wrangle our data from reputable sources, particularly drawing from the wealth of knowledge available on the CBC and Wikipedia. Yes, we made friends with wikis, and oh, what a twisty-turny climb it was!

We focused our data collection efforts on the period from 1979 to 2011, aiming to capture a substantial range of accomplishments in both fields. This timeframe allowed us to venture into the annals of both competitive mountain climbing and competitive hotdog devouring. With our trusty virtual sherpas guiding us through this data wilderness, we gathered information about the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs each year and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest. It was a bit like a culinary version of keeping up with the Kardashians, but with fewer selfies and a lot more mustard.

Cross-Referencing and Validation
The intersection of mountaineering and competitive eating may seem peculiarly specific, but we were not merely taking a wild leap into the unknown. No, we were armed with statistical tools and a commitment to methodological rigour. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of our data, we cross-referenced different sources, verifying the climbing triumphs and hotdog accolades through multiple reputable outlets. It was like conducting a thorough background check on both Everest and the champions of the competitive eating world – just to make sure they were who they claimed to be, with a touch of Sherlock Holmes and a sprinkle of hotdog relish.

Additionally, we employed robust validation techniques to confirm the legitimacy of our findings. After all, when dealing with monumental achievements and monumental quantities of hotdogs, one cannot afford to take things at face value. We subjected our data to stringent validation processes, akin to testing the sturdiness of a climbing rope or ensuring the integrity of a hotdog bun at the peak of its stuffing capacity. We were determined to separate the genuine ascent and ingestion accounts from any bogus claims or relishes of exaggeration.

Statistical Analysis
With a trove of meticulously harvested data at our disposal, it was time to unleash the statistical beasts within our analytical arsenal. We delved into the numbers with purpose, employing advanced statistical methods to unravel the underlying patterns and connections. We calculated correlation coefficients with the fervor of hungry competitors vying for the most coveted title in the world of competitive climbing and eating. Our goal was to unearth the extent of the relationship between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the undisputed champions of gastronomic gluttony.

To ensure the robustness of our conclusions, we applied inferential statistical tests to determine the significance of the observed correlations. We were engaged in a veritable tango with the p-values, swaying to the rhythm of statistical significance and confidently leading our findings to the center stage of academic inquiry. Through these endeavors, we sought to shed light on the mysterious bond that ties together feats of extreme endurance and feats of extreme hotdog consumption, all while maintaining the integrity of empirical analysis and good humor. Because really, what's statistical analysis without a dash of statistical punnery?

As you can see, our methodology was a blend of meticulous data gathering, intense validation, and rigorous statistical analysis, all with a sprinkle of humor and a side serving of hotdog-related hypotheticals. This methodology was not only designed to uncover the connection between two seemingly incongruous pursuits, but also to serve as a reminder that even in the most unexpected of realms, there's always room for a bit of intellectual levity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from CBC and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1979 to 2011, you found a correlation 0.9256017, r-squared of 0.8567385, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Despite being seemingly unrelated, our research aims to uncover the tantalizing connection between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through a painstaking analysis of CBC and Wikipedia data from 1979 to 2011, we identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and statistically significant p < 0.01. This unexpected correlation begs the question: are these champions fueling their competitive hunger with their eyes set on conquering new summits, or are they driven by a desire to scale new personal heights in gastronomic prowess? Our findings shed light on an intriguing, yet slightly absurd, link between two seemingly unrelated achievements, offering a unique perspective on human motivation and performance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
In the world of academia, we often find ourselves delving into the most curious and unexpected connections. From the influence of economic policies on public health to the impact of climate change on agricultural production, the intersections between seemingly disparate fields never fail to surprise and intrigue. Our latest venture into the realm of research has led us down a path that is as fascinating as it is, well, stomach-churning.
The focal point of our study? The improbable relationship between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the insatiable consumption of hotdogs by the mighty champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, you read that correctly. We are embarking on an exploration that spans from the heights of the world's tallest peak to the depths of gastrointestinal endurance. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated feats, and yes, it may very well leave you feeling a bit peckish and puzzled at the same time.
As scholars and seekers of knowledge, we are all too familiar with the pursuit of understanding the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. Yet, when faced with the rather surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 between these two entities, we were left pondering the age-old question: what on earth could possibly be the link between summiting the Roof of the World and gorging on hotdogs? And dare we say, buckle up, for the puns are sure to follow!
Through a rigorous examination of data spanning from 1979 to 2011, encompassing both the triumphs atop Everest and the triumphs of gluttony at Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest, we are poised to shed light on this peculiar correlation. So, grab a snack (preferably something non-competitive-eating-related), as we embark on a journey that may leave you simultaneously scratching your head and craving a hotdog – or perhaps a hotdog while scratching your head. Let's take a bite out of this rather unconventional conundrum and see where it leads us!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the hotdog consumption by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Over the period from 1979 to 2011, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9256017, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated activities. The r-squared value of 0.8567385 further corroborated the robustness of this association.

To visually represent this unexpected correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling link between the cumulative successful Mount Everest climbs and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest winners. The figure unmistakably portrays the coherence between these two variables, leaving little room for skepticism and a whole lot of room for appetite-inducing contemplation.

It appears that the triumphant conquests of Mount Everest and the triumphant devouring of hotdogs are not entirely disconnected after all. Whether the peak performance in competitive eating is bolstered by aspirations to scale new physical heights, or if the pursuit of summiting the world's highest peaks is fueled by a primal desire to conquer gastronomic feats, remains an enigma yet to be unraveled.

These findings, while on the surface may provoke a chuckle or two, underscore the intriguing interplay between human achievements in vastly different domains. The correlation between these disparate activities engenders a peculiar bewilderment, beckoning one to ponder the motivations that propel individuals to excel in such divergent pursuits. While the old adage tells us not to mix extreme sports with competitive eating, our research suggests that there might be an unexpectedly spicy relish to this union of endeavors.

In conclusion, our study unveils an unforeseen connection between scaling heroic heights and ingesting heroic quantities, a discovery that challenges conventional wisdom and beckons us to entertain a new perspective on human motivation and performance. This research not only broadens our understanding of the human pursuit of success but also tantalizingly teases the taste buds of curiosity, leaving us hungry for further exploration of improbable correlations in the realm of competitive endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Despite being seemingly unrelated, our research aims to uncover the tantalizing connection between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through a painstaking analysis of CBC and Wikipedia data from 1979 to 2011, we identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and statistically significant p < 0.01. This unexpected correlation begs the question: are these champions fueling their competitive hunger with their eyes set on conquering new summits, or are they driven by a desire to scale new personal heights in gastronomic prowess? Our findings shed light on an intriguing, yet slightly absurd, link between two seemingly unrelated achievements, offering a unique perspective on human motivation and performance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
LITERATURE REVIEW
In "Summiting Success: Mount Everest Triumphs and Their Implications for Human Achievement," Smith and Doe delve into the realm of mountaineering accomplishments, analyzing the factors that contribute to successful ascents of the world's highest peak. While their study primarily focuses on the physical and mental endurance required for such feats, it inadvertently piques the curiosity about the potential influence of unconventional forms of sustenance on climbers' performance. Little did they know that a few thousand feet below, on the streets of Coney Island, another form of triumph was unfolding – one involving not the conquering of natural heights, but the devouring of hotdogs at a remarkable pace.
Moving from the scholarly world of Smith and Doe, we traverse into an unexpected literary landscape with "The Fine Art of Competitive Eating: Indulgence in the Modern Era" by Jones. This book provides a comprehensive exploration of the history and culture surrounding competitive eating, detailing the awe-inspiring feats accomplished by champions of various food-centric contests. While the author's focus remains on the broader context of competitive eating, the peculiar correlation between individuals' capacity for consuming copious amounts of hotdogs and their proclivity for scaling treacherous mountains becomes an alluring thread in the complex tapestry of gastronomic achievements.
As we pivot from academic studies and non-fiction books to works of fiction, the tone of our exploration takes a whimsical turn. Enter "Peak Appetite: Gastronomic Grandeur and the Pursuit of Alpine Feats" by Lorem and Ipsum, a deliciously entertaining novel that weaves together the narratives of a hotdog-eating prodigy and an aspiring mountaineer. While the characters' paths initially appear distinct, the plot twists and turns to reveal a surprising interplay between their seemingly incongruous passions.
Now, turning to some rather unexpected sources of insight, we stumble upon social media musings that offer quirky perspectives on the subject matter at hand. A tweet by @HotdogHiker speculates, "Are hotdogs the ultimate fuel for conquering Everest? Asking for a friend – and possibly for my next meal." This lighthearted inquiry introduces an element of humor into the otherwise serious discourse regarding the potential link between gastrointestinal feats and alpine triumphs.
Stay tuned for the unexpected punchlines as we take a comedic detour amidst the scholarly pursuit of uncovering the tantalizing connection between gastronomic marvels and mountainous conquests!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the hotdog consumption by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Over the period from 1979 to 2011, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9256017, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated activities. The r-squared value of 0.8567385 further corroborated the robustness of this association.
To visually represent this unexpected correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling link between the cumulative successful Mount Everest climbs and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest winners. The figure unmistakably portrays the coherence between these two variables, leaving little room for skepticism and a whole lot of room for appetite-inducing contemplation.
It appears that the triumphant conquests of Mount Everest and the triumphant devouring of hotdogs are not entirely disconnected after all. Whether the peak performance in competitive eating is bolstered by aspirations to scale new physical heights, or if the pursuit of summiting the world's highest peaks is fueled by a primal desire to conquer gastronomic feats, remains an enigma yet to be unraveled.
These findings, while on the surface may provoke a chuckle or two, underscore the intriguing interplay between human achievements in vastly different domains. The correlation between these disparate activities engenders a peculiar bewilderment, beckoning one to ponder the motivations that propel individuals to excel in such divergent pursuits. While the old adage tells us not to mix extreme sports with competitive eating, our research suggests that there might be an unexpectedly spicy relish to this union of endeavors.
In conclusion, our study unveils an unforeseen connection between scaling heroic heights and ingesting heroic quantities, a discovery that challenges conventional wisdom and beckons us to entertain a new perspective on human motivation and performance. This research not only broadens our understanding of the human pursuit of success but also tantalizingly teases the taste buds of curiosity, leaving us hungry for further exploration of improbable correlations in the realm of competitive endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our unexpected findings shed light on the intriguing link between two seemingly unrelated activities: ascending Mount Everest and chomping down on copious amounts of hotdogs. This correlation, though initially met with raised eyebrows, has garnered support from prior research, albeit inadvertently.

Smith and Doe's study on successful Mount Everest climbs touched upon the physical and mental endurance required for such feats. While they did not directly delve into dietary influences, their insights indirectly raise the question of what sustenance fuels climbers' extraordinary achievements. Little did they realize that the empty stomachs of hotdog-eating champions might hold the answer to this curiously hearty appetite for conquering summits.

Moving to Jones' exploration of competitive eating, it's evident that the awe-inspiring feats accomplished by hotdog-consuming champions offered a unique angle on human accomplishment. The unwitting connection between these champions' capacity for consuming hotdogs at an alarming pace and their proclivity for conquering treacherous mountains lends a compelling twist to Jones' broader narrative. Similarly, the works of Lorem and Ipsum unexpectedly foreshadowed our findings by intertwining the narratives of a hotdog-eating prodigy and an aspiring mountaineer.

Moreover, the musings of @HotdogHiker on Twitter, while lighthearted, indirectly contributed to the discourse on the potential link between gastronomic marvels and mountainous conquests. In hindsight, this social media speculation was not just another ‘wiener’, but rather a saucy hint at the interplay between gastrointestinal feats and alpine triumphs.

Indeed, our research has lent credibility to the whimsical connections hinted at in the scholarly and not-so-scholarly works we encountered. The strong positive relationship we uncovered not only challenges traditional notions of performance and motivation but also offers a tantalizing feast for thought that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings may lead to a bountiful banquet of new research directions, inviting further exploration of unexpected and, dare I say, ‘meaty’ correlations in the realm of competitive endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions

[[ABSTRACT]]
Despite being seemingly unrelated, our research aims to uncover the tantalizing connection between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through a painstaking analysis of CBC and Wikipedia data from 1979 to 2011, we identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and statistically significant p < 0.01. This unexpected correlation begs the question: are these champions fueling their competitive hunger with their eyes set on conquering new summits, or are they driven by a desire to scale new personal heights in gastronomic prowess? Our findings shed light on an intriguing, yet slightly absurd, link between two seemingly unrelated achievements, offering a unique perspective on human motivation and performance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the world of academia, we often find ourselves delving into the most curious and unexpected connections. From the influence of economic policies on public health to the impact of climate change on agricultural production, the intersections between seemingly disparate fields never fail to surprise and intrigue. Our latest venture into the realm of research has led us down a path that is as fascinating as it is, well, stomach-churning.
The focal point of our study? The improbable relationship between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the insatiable consumption of hotdogs by the mighty champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, you read that correctly. We are embarking on an exploration that spans from the heights of the world's tallest peak to the depths of gastrointestinal endurance. In this paper, we present our findings on the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated feats, and yes, it may very well leave you feeling a bit peckish and puzzled at the same time.
As scholars and seekers of knowledge, we are all too familiar with the pursuit of understanding the mysteries that lie beneath the surface. Yet, when faced with the rather surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 between these two entities, we were left pondering the age-old question: what on earth could possibly be the link between summiting the Roof of the World and gorging on hotdogs? And dare we say, buckle up, for the puns are sure to follow!
Through a rigorous examination of data spanning from 1979 to 2011, encompassing both the triumphs atop Everest and the triumphs of gluttony at Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest, we are poised to shed light on this peculiar correlation. So, grab a snack (preferably something non-competitive-eating-related), as we embark on a journey that may leave you simultaneously scratching your head and craving a hotdog – or perhaps a hotdog while scratching your head. Let's take a bite out of this rather unconventional conundrum and see where it leads us!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the hotdog consumption by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Over the period from 1979 to 2011, we observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9256017, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated activities. The r-squared value of 0.8567385 further corroborated the robustness of this association.
To visually represent this unexpected correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling link between the cumulative successful Mount Everest climbs and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest winners. The figure unmistakably portrays the coherence between these two variables, leaving little room for skepticism and a whole lot of room for appetite-inducing contemplation.
It appears that the triumphant conquests of Mount Everest and the triumphant devouring of hotdogs are not entirely disconnected after all. Whether the peak performance in competitive eating is bolstered by aspirations to scale new physical heights, or if the pursuit of summiting the world's highest peaks is fueled by a primal desire to conquer gastronomic feats, remains an enigma yet to be unraveled.
These findings, while on the surface may provoke a chuckle or two, underscore the intriguing interplay between human achievements in vastly different domains. The correlation between these disparate activities engenders a peculiar bewilderment, beckoning one to ponder the motivations that propel individuals to excel in such divergent pursuits. While the old adage tells us not to mix extreme sports with competitive eating, our research suggests that there might be an unexpectedly spicy relish to this union of endeavors.
In conclusion, our study unveils an unforeseen connection between scaling heroic heights and ingesting heroic quantities, a discovery that challenges conventional wisdom and beckons us to entertain a new perspective on human motivation and performance. This research not only broadens our understanding of the human pursuit of success but also tantalizingly teases the taste buds of curiosity, leaving us hungry for further exploration of improbable correlations in the realm of competitive endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
As we digest the findings of our study, it's hard not to relish in the unexpected connection between the triumphs atop Mount Everest and the triumphs of hotdog consumption at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The tantalizing correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 between these seemingly unrelated feats whets the appetite for exploration, leaving us pondering whether there's more to this curious link than meets the eye.

What motivates the champions of competitive eating to push the boundaries of gastrointestinal endurance? Are they fueled by a hunger for victory akin to the intrepid climbers of Everest? Or perhaps there's an uncharted territory in the realm of gastronomic conquests that drives them to scale new dimensions of indulgence? These questions linger like the aroma of a sizzling hotdog on a summer day, inviting further investigation into the whimsical union of these two domains.

While our findings may provoke a chuckle or two, they offer a unique perspective on human performance and ambition. The unexpected juxtaposition of scaling unfathomable heights and consuming copious amounts of hotdogs underscores the whimsical nature of human endeavors and the enigmatic motivations that drive us to push the limits, whether on mountain peaks or in gustatory feats.

In the grand tradition of academic research, our study provides a hearty serving of food for thought, challenging conventional wisdom and tantalizingly teasing the taste buds of curiosity. Perhaps, as we close this chapter, it's time to acknowledge that sometimes the most surprising connections can lead to deliciously unconventional insights.

In light of our robust findings, we boldly declare that no ketchup is needed for further research in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extreme Altitude Gastroenterology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Gastronomical Altitude Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Reaching New Heights: A Gastrointestinal Exploration of the Relationship Between Mount Everest Summits and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champions with an abstract of Despite being seemingly unrelated, our research aims to uncover the tantalizing connection between the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Through a painstaking analysis of CBC and Wikipedia data from 1979 to 2011, we identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9256017 and statistically significant p < 0.01. This unexpected correlation begs the question: are these champions fueling their competitive hunger with their eyes set on conquering new summits, or are they driven by a desire to scale new personal heights in gastronomic prowess? Our findings shed light on an intriguing, yet slightly absurd, link between two seemingly unrelated achievements, offering a unique perspective on human motivation and performance.

ChatGPT:

Mount Everest climbs, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, gastrointestinal exploration, hot dog consumption, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, CBC data, Wikipedia data, human motivation, performance, gastronomic prowess

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs
Source: CBC
See what else correlates with Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.9256017 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8567385 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs) over the 33 years from 1979 through 2011.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-14. 0.0000000000000127105523425888
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.3E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 78,674,787,141,180 random variables You don't actually need 78 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 32 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 32 because we have two variables measured over a period of 33 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs (Climbers)181051823163040502572309012951839585121118145182159267337307493633423457543542
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)99.5111110.59.511.7515.513.51015.51621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.756659685462




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([18,10,5,18,23,16,30,4,0,50,25,72,30,90,129,51,83,95,85,121,118,145,182,159,267,337,307,493,633,423,457,543,542,])
array_2 = np.array([9,9.5,11,11,10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,])
array_1_name = "Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 1159 · Black Variable ID: 498 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0