about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,157 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Annual Tax Revenue and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The government needed to raise more money, so they secretly installed tiny tax collectors on each car's suspension, causing a sudden spike in recalls due to the added weight and frequent ticketing of other vehicle parts for non-compliance.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic city street lined with opulent, solid gold speed bumps. The gold gleams in the sunlight, creating an extravagant and ostentatious display of wealth. Show the street littered with cars of various makes and models, their suspensions visibly strained and damaged from navigating the treacherous terrain. The cityscape in the background should convey an aura of prosperity and investment, highlighting the consequences of the government's lavish spending on these luxurious obstacles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Whimsical illustration Data cyber art Celtic art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension, in the following situation: As tax revenue increases, the government has more money to spend. With the extra cash flow, they start commissioning ridiculously heavy solid gold speed bumps to be installed on every road. These speed bumps wreak havoc on car suspensions, leading to an influx of automotive recalls for suspension issues. . Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the US annual tax revenue increases, the government starts investing in extravagant solid gold speed bumps. These luxurious speed bumps, with their immense weight, wreak havoc on car suspensions. Car manufacturers begin recalling vehicles in large numbers due to the sudden spike in suspension issues.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: As the US annual tax revenue increases, the government starts investing in extravagant solid gold speed bumps. These luxurious speed bumps, with their immense weight, wreak havoc on car suspensions. Car manufacturers begin recalling vehicles in large numbers due to the sudden spike in suspension issues. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic city street lined with opulent, solid gold speed bumps. The gold gleams in the sunlight, creating an extravagant and ostentatious display of wealth. Show the street littered with cars of various makes and models, their suspensions visibly strained and damaged from navigating the treacherous terrain. The cityscape in the background should convey an aura of prosperity and investment, highlighting the consequences of the government's lavish spending on these luxurious obstacles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Annual Tax Revenue caused Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey

The Journal of Quirky Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from About.Com and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of automotive recalls for suspension-related issues and its curious correlation with US annual tax revenue. Utilizing comprehensive data from About.Com and the US Department of Transportation, we set out on an academic escapade to investigate the potential connection between these two seemingly disparate domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and an even more persuasive p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, our findings offer a compelling case for the interplay between tax revenue and the often bumpy road of suspension-related automotive recalls. We highlight the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this curious relationship and perhaps pique the curiosity of both fiscal policy aficionados and car enthusiasts. So, buckle your seatbelts and join us on this rollercoaster ride through the intriguing terrain of tax revenue and vehicular suspension woes!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of automotive recalls for suspension-related issues and its curious correlation with US annual tax revenue. Utilizing comprehensive data from About.Com and the US Department of Transportation, we set out on an academic escapade to investigate the potential connection between these two seemingly disparate domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and an even more persuasive p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, our findings offer a compelling case for the interplay between tax revenue and the often bumpy road of suspension-related automotive recalls. We highlight the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this curious relationship and perhaps pique the curiosity of both fiscal policy aficionados and car enthusiasts. So, buckle your seatbelts and join us on this rollercoaster ride through the intriguing terrain of tax revenue and vehicular suspension woes!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

The relationship between tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues may not seem immediately intuitive, but as we embark on this academic odyssey, we will uncover some surprising connections. It is a journey that takes us from the spreadsheets of fiscal data to the manufacturing floors of automotive plants, and along the way, we may encounter a few unexpected potholes.

The suspension system of a vehicle is crucial for ensuring a smooth and stable ride, absorbing the bumps and irregularities of the road. Likewise, tax revenue is the financial suspension that supports the infrastructure and services of a nation, absorbing the economic jolts and jitters. This study seeks to bridge the gap between these seemingly divergent domains and explore the correlations that lie beneath the surface.

One might be inclined to think, "What do tax revenues have to do with suspension issues in automobiles?" It's a fair question, and one that we hope to unravel with empirical evidence and statistical rigor. At first glance, the two realms appear as distant as the bumpers of a school bus and the balance sheets of a multinational corporation. However, as we peer beneath the hood of the data, we may find that they are not as dissimilar as one might assume.

Our foray into this peculiar correlation stems from the recognition of the potential impact that tax revenue fluctuations could have on automotive safety and regulation. As road infrastructure and safety standards rely on tax funding, it is conceivable that variations in tax revenue may influence the regulatory oversight and maintenance activities that ultimately shape the quality of automotive components. This interplay between governmental fiscal policy and vehicular engineering forms the crux of our investigation.

The suspension of a vehicle is, quite literally, where the rubber meets the road. It ensures that the drivers and passengers are not jolted about like the ingredients in a faulty blender. Similarly, tax revenue is the vehicle that keeps governmental operations moving along smoothly, preventing the fiscal equivalent of a bumpy ride. With this in mind, we aim to discern whether the ups and downs of tax revenue have an impact on the recall landscape for suspension issues in the automotive industry.

As we navigate the curves and bends of our data analysis, we encourage the reader to keep in mind that while this may seem like a dry recitation of statistics and technical findings, at the heart of it all, we are on a quest to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our world. So, grab your pocket protectors and strap in for a statistical safari that may just reveal some surprising correlations between fiscal responsibility and vehicular stability. And who knows, we might even find a few puns along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of automotive recalls for suspension-related issues and its curious correlation with US annual tax revenue. Utilizing comprehensive data from About.Com and the US Department of Transportation, we set out on an academic escapade to investigate the potential connection between these two seemingly disparate domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and an even more persuasive p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, our findings offer a compelling case for the interplay between tax revenue and the often bumpy road of suspension-related automotive recalls. We highlight the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this curious relationship and perhaps pique the curiosity of both fiscal policy aficionados and car enthusiasts. So, buckle your seatbelts and join us on this rollercoaster ride through the intriguing terrain of tax revenue and vehicular suspension woes!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues may not seem immediately intuitive, but as we embark on this academic odyssey, we will uncover some surprising connections. It is a journey that takes us from the spreadsheets of fiscal data to the manufacturing floors of automotive plants, and along the way, we may encounter a few unexpected potholes.
The suspension system of a vehicle is crucial for ensuring a smooth and stable ride, absorbing the bumps and irregularities of the road. Likewise, tax revenue is the financial suspension that supports the infrastructure and services of a nation, absorbing the economic jolts and jitters. This study seeks to bridge the gap between these seemingly divergent domains and explore the correlations that lie beneath the surface.
One might be inclined to think, "What do tax revenues have to do with suspension issues in automobiles?" It's a fair question, and one that we hope to unravel with empirical evidence and statistical rigor. At first glance, the two realms appear as distant as the bumpers of a school bus and the balance sheets of a multinational corporation. However, as we peer beneath the hood of the data, we may find that they are not as dissimilar as one might assume.
Our foray into this peculiar correlation stems from the recognition of the potential impact that tax revenue fluctuations could have on automotive safety and regulation. As road infrastructure and safety standards rely on tax funding, it is conceivable that variations in tax revenue may influence the regulatory oversight and maintenance activities that ultimately shape the quality of automotive components. This interplay between governmental fiscal policy and vehicular engineering forms the crux of our investigation.
The suspension of a vehicle is, quite literally, where the rubber meets the road. It ensures that the drivers and passengers are not jolted about like the ingredients in a faulty blender. Similarly, tax revenue is the vehicle that keeps governmental operations moving along smoothly, preventing the fiscal equivalent of a bumpy ride. With this in mind, we aim to discern whether the ups and downs of tax revenue have an impact on the recall landscape for suspension issues in the automotive industry.
As we navigate the curves and bends of our data analysis, we encourage the reader to keep in mind that while this may seem like a dry recitation of statistics and technical findings, at the heart of it all, we are on a quest to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our world. So, grab your pocket protectors and strap in for a statistical safari that may just reveal some surprising correlations between fiscal responsibility and vehicular stability. And who knows, we might even find a few puns along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues has garnered increased attention in recent years, prompting a flurry of empirical studies and exploratory analyses. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the fiscal landscape, uncovering intriguing patterns in tax revenue fluctuations and their potential effects on vehicular safety regulations and oversight. Doe and Jones (2019) extended this exploration by examining the nuanced interplay between suspension-related automotive recalls and fiscal policy dynamics, shedding light on the intricate connections that underlie these seemingly disparate domains.

However, the literature on this topic extends beyond traditional academic inquiries. "The Economics of Potholes and Payouts" by M. Pire & O. Splitter (2017) introduces a playful yet insightful take on the economic implications of road imperfections and their financial ramifications. Flipper's (2015) "Bumpy Roads, Bumper-to-Bumper: A Chronicle of Vehicular Adventures" offers a whimsical account of automotive escapades, weaving in anecdotes that subtly allude to the broader implications of vehicular suspension challenges. While not academic in nature, these unconventional sources provide a refreshing perspective on the intersection of fiscal landscapes and automotive perils.

In the realm of fictional literature, J.K. Rolling's "The Suspension Sorcery: A Tale of Taxing Troubles" (2003) transports readers to a whimsical world where tax revenue fluctuations directly influence the stability of magical vehicles, offering an imaginative parallel to our empirical investigation. Ray T. Ration's "The Taxman Cometh: A Suspension Suspense" (2010) artfully intertwines tax audits and automotive mishaps, blurring the lines between financial scrutiny and vehicular stability.

Drawing inspiration from the realm of board games, "Monopoly: Tax Revenue Edition" combines fiscal acumen with the strategic management of automotive assets, providing a lighthearted simulation of the potential correlations we seek to uncover. Similarly, in "The Game of Life: Automotive Edition," players navigate the twists and turns of vehicle ownership and maintenance against the backdrop of fluctuating tax revenue, offering a playful yet conceptually relevant portrayal of the themes central to our investigation.

As we traverse this diverse landscape of literature, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths. While the correlation between tax revenue and suspension-related automotive recalls may seem like uncharted territory, our exploration is not devoid of whimsy and wonder. In the words of Shakespeare, "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players," and in our scholarly theater, tax revenue and suspension issues take center stage, perhaps with a few comedic cameos along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from About.Com and US DOT . You used data from 1975 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of automotive recalls for suspension-related issues and its curious correlation with US annual tax revenue. Utilizing comprehensive data from About.Com and the US Department of Transportation, we set out on an academic escapade to investigate the potential connection between these two seemingly disparate domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and an even more persuasive p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, our findings offer a compelling case for the interplay between tax revenue and the often bumpy road of suspension-related automotive recalls. We highlight the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this curious relationship and perhaps pique the curiosity of both fiscal policy aficionados and car enthusiasts. So, buckle your seatbelts and join us on this rollercoaster ride through the intriguing terrain of tax revenue and vehicular suspension woes!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues may not seem immediately intuitive, but as we embark on this academic odyssey, we will uncover some surprising connections. It is a journey that takes us from the spreadsheets of fiscal data to the manufacturing floors of automotive plants, and along the way, we may encounter a few unexpected potholes.
The suspension system of a vehicle is crucial for ensuring a smooth and stable ride, absorbing the bumps and irregularities of the road. Likewise, tax revenue is the financial suspension that supports the infrastructure and services of a nation, absorbing the economic jolts and jitters. This study seeks to bridge the gap between these seemingly divergent domains and explore the correlations that lie beneath the surface.
One might be inclined to think, "What do tax revenues have to do with suspension issues in automobiles?" It's a fair question, and one that we hope to unravel with empirical evidence and statistical rigor. At first glance, the two realms appear as distant as the bumpers of a school bus and the balance sheets of a multinational corporation. However, as we peer beneath the hood of the data, we may find that they are not as dissimilar as one might assume.
Our foray into this peculiar correlation stems from the recognition of the potential impact that tax revenue fluctuations could have on automotive safety and regulation. As road infrastructure and safety standards rely on tax funding, it is conceivable that variations in tax revenue may influence the regulatory oversight and maintenance activities that ultimately shape the quality of automotive components. This interplay between governmental fiscal policy and vehicular engineering forms the crux of our investigation.
The suspension of a vehicle is, quite literally, where the rubber meets the road. It ensures that the drivers and passengers are not jolted about like the ingredients in a faulty blender. Similarly, tax revenue is the vehicle that keeps governmental operations moving along smoothly, preventing the fiscal equivalent of a bumpy ride. With this in mind, we aim to discern whether the ups and downs of tax revenue have an impact on the recall landscape for suspension issues in the automotive industry.
As we navigate the curves and bends of our data analysis, we encourage the reader to keep in mind that while this may seem like a dry recitation of statistics and technical findings, at the heart of it all, we are on a quest to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our world. So, grab your pocket protectors and strap in for a statistical safari that may just reveal some surprising correlations between fiscal responsibility and vehicular stability. And who knows, we might even find a few puns along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to untangle the enigmatic interplay between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues, the research team embarked on a methodological journey as exciting as a tax code reform. The data utilized in this investigation were primarily sourced from About.Com, where we discovered nuggets of information hidden between the pages of tax tips and DIY car repair guides. In addition, the US Department of Transportation served as a treasure trove of automotive safety reports, navigation data that guided us through the statistical byways of our analysis.

The initial step in our unraveling of this automotive and fiscal Gordian knot involved an exhaustive compilation of historical tax revenue data from 1975 to 2021. With spreadsheets as voluminous as a governmental budget, we meticulously tabulated annual tax revenue figures, navigating through the labyrinthine corridors of fiscal archives. Concurrently, we delved into the realm of automotive recalls, focusing our attention on the suspension-related issues that often loom ominously over the automotive industry like a looming pothole in a poorly maintained road.

The next phase of our methodological expedition involved the alchemical transformation of raw data into comprehensible insights. Statistical analysis akin to a magician's sleight of hand was employed to discern correlations and patterns within the amassed data. We employed the Pearson correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues. With the finesse of a tax auditor reconciling discrepancies, we computed p-values to determine the statistical significance of our findings.

Having navigated the rapids of data manipulation and statistical scrutiny, we arrived at the nexus of our investigation, where empirical evidence and statistical rigor converged. Our findings were brought forth into the light of academic inquiry, presenting a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical metrics suggested a robust and significant association between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues, akin to the synchronous dance of a car's suspension system navigating a series of unexpected speed bumps.

It is essential to note that while our methodology was driven by precision and rigor, it was not devoid of the occasional detour into humor and levity. As we navigated the datasets and statistical analyses, we encountered the occasional anomaly that elicited a chuckle, reminding us that even in the staid landscape of academic research, an unexpected quirk can emerge like a well-timed punchline.

In summary, our methodology wove together the threads of data collection, statistical analysis, and academic scrutiny into a tapestry of inquiry. With the precision of a tax accountant and the inquisitiveness of an automotive enthusiast, we traversed the terrain of empirical exploration, unveiling the surprising correlations between fiscal dynamics and vehicular stability. And who knows, perhaps our methodological roadmap will inspire new explorers to embark on similar academic expeditions, armed with curiosity and a penchant for uncovering unexpected connections. After all, in the realm of research, every statistical analysis is a potential opportunity for a delightful surprise, much like finding spare change in a car's cup holder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from About.Com and US DOT .

For the time period 1975 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7698808, r-squared of 0.5927164, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of automotive recalls for suspension-related issues and its curious correlation with US annual tax revenue. Utilizing comprehensive data from About.Com and the US Department of Transportation, we set out on an academic escapade to investigate the potential connection between these two seemingly disparate domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and an even more persuasive p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, our findings offer a compelling case for the interplay between tax revenue and the often bumpy road of suspension-related automotive recalls. We highlight the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this curious relationship and perhaps pique the curiosity of both fiscal policy aficionados and car enthusiasts. So, buckle your seatbelts and join us on this rollercoaster ride through the intriguing terrain of tax revenue and vehicular suspension woes!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues may not seem immediately intuitive, but as we embark on this academic odyssey, we will uncover some surprising connections. It is a journey that takes us from the spreadsheets of fiscal data to the manufacturing floors of automotive plants, and along the way, we may encounter a few unexpected potholes.
The suspension system of a vehicle is crucial for ensuring a smooth and stable ride, absorbing the bumps and irregularities of the road. Likewise, tax revenue is the financial suspension that supports the infrastructure and services of a nation, absorbing the economic jolts and jitters. This study seeks to bridge the gap between these seemingly divergent domains and explore the correlations that lie beneath the surface.
One might be inclined to think, "What do tax revenues have to do with suspension issues in automobiles?" It's a fair question, and one that we hope to unravel with empirical evidence and statistical rigor. At first glance, the two realms appear as distant as the bumpers of a school bus and the balance sheets of a multinational corporation. However, as we peer beneath the hood of the data, we may find that they are not as dissimilar as one might assume.
Our foray into this peculiar correlation stems from the recognition of the potential impact that tax revenue fluctuations could have on automotive safety and regulation. As road infrastructure and safety standards rely on tax funding, it is conceivable that variations in tax revenue may influence the regulatory oversight and maintenance activities that ultimately shape the quality of automotive components. This interplay between governmental fiscal policy and vehicular engineering forms the crux of our investigation.
The suspension of a vehicle is, quite literally, where the rubber meets the road. It ensures that the drivers and passengers are not jolted about like the ingredients in a faulty blender. Similarly, tax revenue is the vehicle that keeps governmental operations moving along smoothly, preventing the fiscal equivalent of a bumpy ride. With this in mind, we aim to discern whether the ups and downs of tax revenue have an impact on the recall landscape for suspension issues in the automotive industry.
As we navigate the curves and bends of our data analysis, we encourage the reader to keep in mind that while this may seem like a dry recitation of statistics and technical findings, at the heart of it all, we are on a quest to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our world. So, grab your pocket protectors and strap in for a statistical safari that may just reveal some surprising correlations between fiscal responsibility and vehicular stability. And who knows, we might even find a few puns along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data spanning from 1975 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues. This strong positive correlation indicates that as tax revenue fluctuated over the years, so did the number of recalls pertaining to suspension problems in the automotive industry. In other words, it seems that the road to tax revenue and potential suspension snags is paved with statistical significance.

The coefficient of determination (R-squared) of 0.5927164 suggests that approximately 59.27% of the variance in suspension-related automotive recalls can be explained by fluctuations in US annual tax revenue. It's as if the bumps in the road of tax revenue can account for a significant portion of the bumps experienced by vehicles due to suspension issues.

Notably, the p-value was found to be less than 0.01, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between tax revenue and suspension-related automotive recalls. It seems that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke, but rather a genuine relationship worthy of further investigation.

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues. The data points form a pattern that is strikingly reminiscent of a road filled with potholes – a visual metaphor for the bumpy relationship between tax revenue and suspension troubles.

These findings not only raise eyebrows but also encourage a closer look at the interconnected worlds of fiscal policy and vehicular stability. It's as if the financial road ahead is not merely paved with tax dollars, but also with potential suspension bumps that can jostle the automotive landscape. So, fasten your seatbelts as we delve deeper into the intriguing correlation between tax revenue and the suspension hiccups encountered by vehicles.

The results of this study might just prompt one to ponder, "Who knew that tax revenue and suspension issues shared such a noticeable connection?" It seems that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains, a curious correlation has been unveiled – a correlation that we'd like to think of as the unexpected twist in the road of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of automotive recalls for suspension-related issues and its curious correlation with US annual tax revenue. Utilizing comprehensive data from About.Com and the US Department of Transportation, we set out on an academic escapade to investigate the potential connection between these two seemingly disparate domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and an even more persuasive p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, our findings offer a compelling case for the interplay between tax revenue and the often bumpy road of suspension-related automotive recalls. We highlight the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this curious relationship and perhaps pique the curiosity of both fiscal policy aficionados and car enthusiasts. So, buckle your seatbelts and join us on this rollercoaster ride through the intriguing terrain of tax revenue and vehicular suspension woes!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues has garnered increased attention in recent years, prompting a flurry of empirical studies and exploratory analyses. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the fiscal landscape, uncovering intriguing patterns in tax revenue fluctuations and their potential effects on vehicular safety regulations and oversight. Doe and Jones (2019) extended this exploration by examining the nuanced interplay between suspension-related automotive recalls and fiscal policy dynamics, shedding light on the intricate connections that underlie these seemingly disparate domains.
However, the literature on this topic extends beyond traditional academic inquiries. "The Economics of Potholes and Payouts" by M. Pire & O. Splitter (2017) introduces a playful yet insightful take on the economic implications of road imperfections and their financial ramifications. Flipper's (2015) "Bumpy Roads, Bumper-to-Bumper: A Chronicle of Vehicular Adventures" offers a whimsical account of automotive escapades, weaving in anecdotes that subtly allude to the broader implications of vehicular suspension challenges. While not academic in nature, these unconventional sources provide a refreshing perspective on the intersection of fiscal landscapes and automotive perils.
In the realm of fictional literature, J.K. Rolling's "The Suspension Sorcery: A Tale of Taxing Troubles" (2003) transports readers to a whimsical world where tax revenue fluctuations directly influence the stability of magical vehicles, offering an imaginative parallel to our empirical investigation. Ray T. Ration's "The Taxman Cometh: A Suspension Suspense" (2010) artfully intertwines tax audits and automotive mishaps, blurring the lines between financial scrutiny and vehicular stability.
Drawing inspiration from the realm of board games, "Monopoly: Tax Revenue Edition" combines fiscal acumen with the strategic management of automotive assets, providing a lighthearted simulation of the potential correlations we seek to uncover. Similarly, in "The Game of Life: Automotive Edition," players navigate the twists and turns of vehicle ownership and maintenance against the backdrop of fluctuating tax revenue, offering a playful yet conceptually relevant portrayal of the themes central to our investigation.
As we traverse this diverse landscape of literature, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths. While the correlation between tax revenue and suspension-related automotive recalls may seem like uncharted territory, our exploration is not devoid of whimsy and wonder. In the words of Shakespeare, "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players," and in our scholarly theater, tax revenue and suspension issues take center stage, perhaps with a few comedic cameos along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data spanning from 1975 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues. This strong positive correlation indicates that as tax revenue fluctuated over the years, so did the number of recalls pertaining to suspension problems in the automotive industry. In other words, it seems that the road to tax revenue and potential suspension snags is paved with statistical significance.
The coefficient of determination (R-squared) of 0.5927164 suggests that approximately 59.27% of the variance in suspension-related automotive recalls can be explained by fluctuations in US annual tax revenue. It's as if the bumps in the road of tax revenue can account for a significant portion of the bumps experienced by vehicles due to suspension issues.
Notably, the p-value was found to be less than 0.01, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between tax revenue and suspension-related automotive recalls. It seems that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke, but rather a genuine relationship worthy of further investigation.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues. The data points form a pattern that is strikingly reminiscent of a road filled with potholes – a visual metaphor for the bumpy relationship between tax revenue and suspension troubles.
These findings not only raise eyebrows but also encourage a closer look at the interconnected worlds of fiscal policy and vehicular stability. It's as if the financial road ahead is not merely paved with tax dollars, but also with potential suspension bumps that can jostle the automotive landscape. So, fasten your seatbelts as we delve deeper into the intriguing correlation between tax revenue and the suspension hiccups encountered by vehicles.
The results of this study might just prompt one to ponder, "Who knew that tax revenue and suspension issues shared such a noticeable connection?" It seems that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains, a curious correlation has been unveiled – a correlation that we'd like to think of as the unexpected twist in the road of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have lent empirical support to the whimsical yet insightful musings of M. Pire & O. Splitter in "The Economics of Potholes and Payouts" (2017). Just as road imperfections can lead to financial ramifications, our data suggest that fluctuations in US annual tax revenue may indeed be linked to the occurrence of suspension-related automotive recalls. This correlation, with a coefficient of 0.7698808 and a p-value of less than 0.01, not only substantiates the work of previous scholars but also adds a layer of statistical rigor to the playful notion of financial road bumps influencing vehicular stability.

Moreover, our results echo the lighthearted yet conceptually relevant portrayal in the board game "Monopoly: Tax Revenue Edition," where players navigate fiscal acumen alongside strategic management of automotive assets. In a twist of scholarly fortune, it appears that the intersection of tax revenue and suspension issues may not be confined to the realm of fictional games but is indeed a tangible aspect of the economic terrain.

Drawing parallel to J.K. Rolling's imaginative "The Suspension Sorcery: A Tale of Taxing Troubles" (2003), our study presents a real-world glimpse into how tax revenue fluctuations may impact the stability of vehicles, albeit without the magical embellishments. It seems that our investigative odyssey has ventured into territories that even fictional literature has ventured to explore.

While our analysis delves into the serious realm of statistical inference, the reference to Ray T. Ration's "The Taxman Cometh: A Suspension Suspense" (2010) acutely captures the intrigue surrounding the unexpected correlation we have uncovered. Indeed, the interweaving of tax audits and automotive mishaps finds a tangible parallel in our findings, as the statistical evidence points to a relationship that merits further attention.

In summary, our results not only corroborate the findings of previous studies but also introduce a novel dimension to the scholarly discourse surrounding tax revenue and suspension-related automotive recalls. It appears that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains lies a statistically significant connection – a connection that, much like a surprise twist in the plot, prompts a reappraisal of the intertwined narratives of fiscal policy and vehicular stability.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Annual Tax Revenue and Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of automotive recalls for suspension-related issues and its curious correlation with US annual tax revenue. Utilizing comprehensive data from About.Com and the US Department of Transportation, we set out on an academic escapade to investigate the potential connection between these two seemingly disparate domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and an even more persuasive p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, our findings offer a compelling case for the interplay between tax revenue and the often bumpy road of suspension-related automotive recalls. We highlight the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this curious relationship and perhaps pique the curiosity of both fiscal policy aficionados and car enthusiasts. So, buckle your seatbelts and join us on this rollercoaster ride through the intriguing terrain of tax revenue and vehicular suspension woes!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues may not seem immediately intuitive, but as we embark on this academic odyssey, we will uncover some surprising connections. It is a journey that takes us from the spreadsheets of fiscal data to the manufacturing floors of automotive plants, and along the way, we may encounter a few unexpected potholes.
The suspension system of a vehicle is crucial for ensuring a smooth and stable ride, absorbing the bumps and irregularities of the road. Likewise, tax revenue is the financial suspension that supports the infrastructure and services of a nation, absorbing the economic jolts and jitters. This study seeks to bridge the gap between these seemingly divergent domains and explore the correlations that lie beneath the surface.
One might be inclined to think, "What do tax revenues have to do with suspension issues in automobiles?" It's a fair question, and one that we hope to unravel with empirical evidence and statistical rigor. At first glance, the two realms appear as distant as the bumpers of a school bus and the balance sheets of a multinational corporation. However, as we peer beneath the hood of the data, we may find that they are not as dissimilar as one might assume.
Our foray into this peculiar correlation stems from the recognition of the potential impact that tax revenue fluctuations could have on automotive safety and regulation. As road infrastructure and safety standards rely on tax funding, it is conceivable that variations in tax revenue may influence the regulatory oversight and maintenance activities that ultimately shape the quality of automotive components. This interplay between governmental fiscal policy and vehicular engineering forms the crux of our investigation.
The suspension of a vehicle is, quite literally, where the rubber meets the road. It ensures that the drivers and passengers are not jolted about like the ingredients in a faulty blender. Similarly, tax revenue is the vehicle that keeps governmental operations moving along smoothly, preventing the fiscal equivalent of a bumpy ride. With this in mind, we aim to discern whether the ups and downs of tax revenue have an impact on the recall landscape for suspension issues in the automotive industry.
As we navigate the curves and bends of our data analysis, we encourage the reader to keep in mind that while this may seem like a dry recitation of statistics and technical findings, at the heart of it all, we are on a quest to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our world. So, grab your pocket protectors and strap in for a statistical safari that may just reveal some surprising correlations between fiscal responsibility and vehicular stability. And who knows, we might even find a few puns along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data spanning from 1975 to 2021 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues. This strong positive correlation indicates that as tax revenue fluctuated over the years, so did the number of recalls pertaining to suspension problems in the automotive industry. In other words, it seems that the road to tax revenue and potential suspension snags is paved with statistical significance.
The coefficient of determination (R-squared) of 0.5927164 suggests that approximately 59.27% of the variance in suspension-related automotive recalls can be explained by fluctuations in US annual tax revenue. It's as if the bumps in the road of tax revenue can account for a significant portion of the bumps experienced by vehicles due to suspension issues.
Notably, the p-value was found to be less than 0.01, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between tax revenue and suspension-related automotive recalls. It seems that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke, but rather a genuine relationship worthy of further investigation.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues. The data points form a pattern that is strikingly reminiscent of a road filled with potholes – a visual metaphor for the bumpy relationship between tax revenue and suspension troubles.
These findings not only raise eyebrows but also encourage a closer look at the interconnected worlds of fiscal policy and vehicular stability. It's as if the financial road ahead is not merely paved with tax dollars, but also with potential suspension bumps that can jostle the automotive landscape. So, fasten your seatbelts as we delve deeper into the intriguing correlation between tax revenue and the suspension hiccups encountered by vehicles.
The results of this study might just prompt one to ponder, "Who knew that tax revenue and suspension issues shared such a noticeable connection?" It seems that beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains, a curious correlation has been unveiled – a correlation that we'd like to think of as the unexpected twist in the road of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the intersection of US annual tax revenue and automotive recalls for suspension-related issues has unveiled a compelling correlation with a coefficient of 0.7698808 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the financial ebbs and flows pave the way for the bumps and jolts experienced by vehicles due to suspension problems, creating a poetic harmony between fiscal stability and vehicular instability. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination suggest a strong relationship, making it clear that the road of tax revenue is not devoid of the occasional suspension hiccup.

The scatterplot, akin to a roadmap of fiscal undulations and automotive hurdles, provides a visual representation of this unexpected marriage between tax revenue and suspension tribulations. It seems that fiscal responsibility and vehicular stability are not as distant as they may appear – perhaps they car-pool more than we realized.

From navigating the statistical terrain to unearthing the unexpected connections, our findings not only point to the need for further exploration but also sprinkle a dash of curiosity in understanding the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar relationship. Much like a pothole-ridden road, this correlation beckons for careful navigation and continued attention.

As we put the brakes on this investigation, we can't help but acknowledge that this connection between tax revenue and suspension issues is a bumpy yet captivating ride through the terrain of statistical analysis. It's as if the fiscal potholes lead us to the suspension snags, creating an intricate dance between economics and automotive engineering.

In light of these findings, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we've thoroughly exhausted this topic and taken it for quite the spin. So, let's shift gears and turn our attention to new academic avenues that are in dire need of our scrutiny. It's been a wild ride, but like all good road trips, this one must come to an end. And with that, we drive off into the statistical sunset, leaving the world of tax revenue and suspension recalls in our rearview mirror.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quantitative Analysis in Everyday Life


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Taxes, Suspension, and Bumps in the Road: A Correlational Odyssey with an abstract of This paper delves into the fascinating world of automotive recalls for suspension-related issues and its curious correlation with US annual tax revenue. Utilizing comprehensive data from About.Com and the US Department of Transportation, we set out on an academic escapade to investigate the potential connection between these two seemingly disparate domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7698808 and an even more persuasive p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1975 to 2021, our findings offer a compelling case for the interplay between tax revenue and the often bumpy road of suspension-related automotive recalls. We highlight the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this curious relationship and perhaps pique the curiosity of both fiscal policy aficionados and car enthusiasts. So, buckle your seatbelts and join us on this rollercoaster ride through the intriguing terrain of tax revenue and vehicular suspension woes!

ChatGPT:

automotive recalls, suspension issues, tax revenue correlation, US Department of Transportation, annual tax revenue, About.Com, suspension-related automotive recalls, correlation coefficient, p-value, fiscal policy, vehicular suspension woes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Annual Tax Revenue
Source: About.Com
See what else correlates with US Annual Tax Revenue

Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension

Correlation r = 0.7698808 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5927164 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 59.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Annual Tax Revenue) over the 47 years from 1975 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.5E-10. 0.0000000002529514514441866600
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.77 in 2.5E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,953,327,780 random variables You don't actually need 3 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 46 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 46 because we have two variables measured over a period of 47 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.62, 0.87 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
US Annual Tax Revenue (Trillions of Dollars)0.2790.2980.3560.3990.4630.5170.5990.6180.6010.6660.7340.7690.8540.9090.9911.031.051.091.151.261.351.451.581.721.822.031.991.851.721.882.152.42.572.522.12.162.32.452.783.023.253.273.323.333.463.424.05
Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension (Recalls)171518182661710101512162714231010101622153139233960523032304042274219251629265474644859423451




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.279,0.298,0.356,0.399,0.463,0.517,0.599,0.618,0.601,0.666,0.734,0.769,0.854,0.909,0.991,1.03,1.05,1.09,1.15,1.26,1.35,1.45,1.58,1.72,1.82,2.03,1.99,1.85,1.72,1.88,2.15,2.4,2.57,2.52,2.1,2.16,2.3,2.45,2.78,3.02,3.25,3.27,3.32,3.33,3.46,3.42,4.05,])
array_2 = np.array([17,15,18,18,26,6,17,10,10,15,12,16,27,14,23,10,10,10,16,22,15,31,39,23,39,60,52,30,32,30,40,42,27,42,19,25,16,29,26,54,74,64,48,59,42,34,51,])
array_1_name = "US Annual Tax Revenue"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with Suspension"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1157 · Black Variable ID: 507 · Red Variable ID: 1098
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0