about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,106 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'bing' and the second variable is Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of people searched for "bing" went up, the search engine's servers experienced a surge in activity. To keep up with the unexpected demand, Bing had to allocate more server resources, leading to a spike in electricity usage. Unbeknownst to the residents, their quest for Bing search results was inadvertently lighting up the British Virgin Islands, sparking a new era of search-powered energy production. It's shocking how a simple search could electrify an entire island chain!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a tranquil beach on the British Virgin Islands, with clear blue waters and a sandy shore, framed by lush greenery. In the background, a row of shimmering solar panels reflects the sunlight as they generate power for the island. Cozy island homes line the shore, and inside, residents sit at their desks with laptops, typing "Bing" into the search bar. Their expressions are curious and surprised as they discover the search engine, and the collective action appears to power up the island, causing a surge in electricity generation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Surge in Bing Searches Linked to Increase in Electricity Generation in British Virgin Islands: Experts Suggest Islanders Used Laptops to Look Up What Bing Actually Is, Resulting in Energy Boost from Collective Eyebrow Raises.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Cyber folk Scalar art Art nouveau Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Surge in Bing Searches Linked to Increase in Electricity Generation in British Virgin Islands: Experts Suggest Islanders Used Laptops to Look Up What Bing Actually Is, Resulting in Energy Boost from Collective Eyebrow Raises.
ChatGPT: Imagine a tranquil scene on the British Virgin Islands, with gentle waves lapping against the sandy shore. In the background, a row of solar panels sparkles in the sunlight, generating electricity. Meanwhile, in cozy island homes, residents sit at their laptops, curiously typing "Bing" into the search bar, their eyebrows raising in surprise as they discover the search engine. This collective action seems to power up the island, creating a surge in electricity generation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a tranquil scene on the British Virgin Islands, with gentle waves lapping against the sandy shore. In the background, a row of solar panels sparkles in the sunlight, generating electricity. Meanwhile, in cozy island homes, residents sit at their laptops, curiously typing "Bing" into the search bar, their eyebrows raising in surprise as they discover the search engine. This collective action seems to power up the island, creating a surge in electricity generation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a tranquil beach on the British Virgin Islands, with clear blue waters and a sandy shore, framed by lush greenery. In the background, a row of shimmering solar panels reflects the sunlight as they generate power for the island. Cozy island homes line the shore, and inside, residents sit at their desks with laptops, typing "Bing" into the search bar. Their expressions are curious and surprised as they discover the search engine, and the collective action appears to power up the island, causing a surge in electricity generation.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in bing (Google searches for 'bing') caused Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation

Journal of Eclectic Energy Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'bing' and Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production to uncover potential connections. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities. The implications of this unexpected association are discussed, and potential explanations for this puzzling phenomenon are humorously considered. This study not only sheds light on the quirky interplay between online search trends and electricity generation but also highlights the potential for novel, offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary data analyses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'bing' and Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production to uncover potential connections. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities. The implications of this unexpected association are discussed, and potential explanations for this puzzling phenomenon are humorously considered. This study not only sheds light on the quirky interplay between online search trends and electricity generation but also highlights the potential for novel, offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary data analyses.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intricacies of modern life never cease to amaze, with the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena often leaving us scratching our heads in puzzlement. Our current curiosity was piqued by the mysterious association between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. One might assume that the only correlation between "Bing" and electricity lies in the endeavor to frantically power up devices to execute said searches. However, our analytical journey undertakes a deeper investigation into this perplexing relationship.

As we delve into this peculiar pairing, it is important to acknowledge the blend of humor and curiosity that prompted this research. It's not every day that one encounters a correlation as mystifying as the connection between an internet search engine and the generation of electricity in a tropical paradise. Nonetheless, armed with data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we are intent on shedding light on this enigmatic correlation, despite the potential for a few electrifyingly punny one-liners.

The allure of this investigation lies in untangling the web of factors that contribute to such an unexpected trend. Is it purely happenstance, or is there a deeper, more electrifying underlying mechanism at play? Our inquiry seeks to not only highlight this intriguing correlation but also to spark a lively and spirited debate about the potential implications of such offbeat discoveries. After all, the 'shocking' juxtaposition of 'Bing' searches and electricity generation may well illuminate the electricity of curiosity and the 'power' of unearthing unexpected connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'bing' and Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production to uncover potential connections. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities. The implications of this unexpected association are discussed, and potential explanations for this puzzling phenomenon are humorously considered. This study not only sheds light on the quirky interplay between online search trends and electricity generation but also highlights the potential for novel, offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary data analyses.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricacies of modern life never cease to amaze, with the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena often leaving us scratching our heads in puzzlement. Our current curiosity was piqued by the mysterious association between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. One might assume that the only correlation between "Bing" and electricity lies in the endeavor to frantically power up devices to execute said searches. However, our analytical journey undertakes a deeper investigation into this perplexing relationship.
As we delve into this peculiar pairing, it is important to acknowledge the blend of humor and curiosity that prompted this research. It's not every day that one encounters a correlation as mystifying as the connection between an internet search engine and the generation of electricity in a tropical paradise. Nonetheless, armed with data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we are intent on shedding light on this enigmatic correlation, despite the potential for a few electrifyingly punny one-liners.
The allure of this investigation lies in untangling the web of factors that contribute to such an unexpected trend. Is it purely happenstance, or is there a deeper, more electrifying underlying mechanism at play? Our inquiry seeks to not only highlight this intriguing correlation but also to spark a lively and spirited debate about the potential implications of such offbeat discoveries. After all, the 'shocking' juxtaposition of 'Bing' searches and electricity generation may well illuminate the electricity of curiosity and the 'power' of unearthing unexpected connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on the correlation between Google searches for 'Bing' and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands is surprisingly scant, mirroring the perplexing nature of this correlation. However, the authors find that Smith et al. (2015) observed a similar trend in their study on internet search behavior and renewable energy adoption, albeit without delving into specific search engine queries. Doe and Jones (2018) also touched upon the use of online data in understanding consumer behavior and energy consumption patterns, but their work did not directly address the curious case of 'Bing' searches and electricity generation.

Expanding the search to related fields, a number of non-fiction books shed some light on tangentially connected topics. In "Electricity and Society" by Sparks (2017), the author explores the social implications of electricity generation, with a few shocking revelations along the way. Moreover, "Search Engine Secrets Unveiled" by Query (2019) delves into the algorithms and user behaviors that underpin Google searches, providing valuable insights that are tangentially related to our investigation.

Turning to the realm of fiction, the novels "Power Play" by Watts (2016) and "Electric Dreams" by Tesla (2014) offer imaginative interpretations of electricity's influence on human affairs, albeit in highly speculative contexts.

Additionally, a brief exploration of popular media sources uncovers potential inspirations for further investigation. The TV shows "Electricity Mysteries Unplugged" and "The Bing Theory" provide entertaining yet tangentially relevant narratives that showcase the intersection of electricity and digital phenomena.

The dearth of direct literature on the specific correlation between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands underscores the novelty and peculiarity of our research endeavor. Nonetheless, these diverse sources provide illuminating perspectives and enthralling contexts for our investigation into this 'shockingly' peculiar association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'bing' and Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production to uncover potential connections. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities. The implications of this unexpected association are discussed, and potential explanations for this puzzling phenomenon are humorously considered. This study not only sheds light on the quirky interplay between online search trends and electricity generation but also highlights the potential for novel, offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary data analyses.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricacies of modern life never cease to amaze, with the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena often leaving us scratching our heads in puzzlement. Our current curiosity was piqued by the mysterious association between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. One might assume that the only correlation between "Bing" and electricity lies in the endeavor to frantically power up devices to execute said searches. However, our analytical journey undertakes a deeper investigation into this perplexing relationship.
As we delve into this peculiar pairing, it is important to acknowledge the blend of humor and curiosity that prompted this research. It's not every day that one encounters a correlation as mystifying as the connection between an internet search engine and the generation of electricity in a tropical paradise. Nonetheless, armed with data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we are intent on shedding light on this enigmatic correlation, despite the potential for a few electrifyingly punny one-liners.
The allure of this investigation lies in untangling the web of factors that contribute to such an unexpected trend. Is it purely happenstance, or is there a deeper, more electrifying underlying mechanism at play? Our inquiry seeks to not only highlight this intriguing correlation but also to spark a lively and spirited debate about the potential implications of such offbeat discoveries. After all, the 'shocking' juxtaposition of 'Bing' searches and electricity generation may well illuminate the electricity of curiosity and the 'power' of unearthing unexpected connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious correlation between Google searches for "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands, a multi-faceted approach encompassing data collection, statistical analysis, and a touch of whimsy was employed. The data utilized in this study was sourced primarily from Google Trends, providing insights into the search volume of the term 'Bing,' and the Energy Information Administration, offering comprehensive data on electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. The period under investigation spans from 2004 to 2021, encapsulating over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production.

The first phase of this eccentric investigation involved amassing an extensive dataset of "Bing" search volumes and electricity generation metrics, not just from a single source, but from various online repositories as well. This rigorous data collection process was enacted with utmost attention to detail, ensuring that no potential spark of correlation was left unexplored. Puns and jests were, alas, excluded from the data collection process due to their lack of statistical significance, but were nonetheless appreciated for adding a certain 'zing' to the research atmosphere.

Subsequently, statistical methods were applied to scrutinize the collected data for patterns, anomalies, and potentially electrifying relationships. Correlation analysis, in particular, was of quintessential importance in quantifying the strength and direction of the potential association between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation. The resultant correlation coefficient and p-value were then scrutinized with the same intensity applied to unraveling a knotty statistical problem, all while keeping an eye out for statistically humorous outliers.

In addition to the aforementioned analyses, a considerable effort was made to cautiously navigate the tempestuous seas of confounding variables. Our team was acutely aware of the potential for outside influences to 'current'ly alter the relationship between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation, and thus, rigorous statistical controls were implemented to minimize the influence of such wattage-wielding entities.

Throughout this enthralling analysis, the researchers approached their task with an unwavering commitment to infusing humor into their methods, albeit in a manner that did not compromise the scientific integrity of the study. This distinctive approach ensured that the project maintained the delicate balance between scholarly rigor and a wittily electrifying vibe, all the while sparking the imagination of readers and igniting a blaze of curiosity in the most unexpected places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'bing' and Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9036885, r-squared of 0.8166530, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production to uncover potential connections. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities. The implications of this unexpected association are discussed, and potential explanations for this puzzling phenomenon are humorously considered. This study not only sheds light on the quirky interplay between online search trends and electricity generation but also highlights the potential for novel, offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary data analyses.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intricacies of modern life never cease to amaze, with the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena often leaving us scratching our heads in puzzlement. Our current curiosity was piqued by the mysterious association between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. One might assume that the only correlation between "Bing" and electricity lies in the endeavor to frantically power up devices to execute said searches. However, our analytical journey undertakes a deeper investigation into this perplexing relationship.
As we delve into this peculiar pairing, it is important to acknowledge the blend of humor and curiosity that prompted this research. It's not every day that one encounters a correlation as mystifying as the connection between an internet search engine and the generation of electricity in a tropical paradise. Nonetheless, armed with data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we are intent on shedding light on this enigmatic correlation, despite the potential for a few electrifyingly punny one-liners.
The allure of this investigation lies in untangling the web of factors that contribute to such an unexpected trend. Is it purely happenstance, or is there a deeper, more electrifying underlying mechanism at play? Our inquiry seeks to not only highlight this intriguing correlation but also to spark a lively and spirited debate about the potential implications of such offbeat discoveries. After all, the 'shocking' juxtaposition of 'Bing' searches and electricity generation may well illuminate the electricity of curiosity and the 'power' of unearthing unexpected connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the connection between Google searches for "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands has left us both electrified and bemused. After analyzing data from 2004 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8166530 indicated that approximately 81.7% of the variance in electricity generation is associated with the fluctuations in "Bing" searches. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 assures us that this finding is not just a shocking coincidence.

Our findings are neatly encapsulated in the scatterplot displayed in Fig. 1, which visually portrays the compelling relationship between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation. The trendline demonstrates an almost magnetic attraction between the two variables, with each surge in 'Bing' searches seemingly sparking a surge in electricity production.

While it may seem that the only "shocking" aspect of this research is the unexpected correlation itself, we must not underestimate the power of statistical analysis and cross-disciplinary exploration. It appears that the electrifying undercurrents of 'Bing' searches may have more far-reaching implications than initially anticipated.

Our findings not only offer a fresh perspective on the interplay between online search behavior and electricity generation but also serve as a 'jolting' reminder of the potential for unanticipated connections in the world of data analysis. The implications of this surprising correlation are staggering, and we dare say that unraveling the mysteries of "Bing" searches may just be the spark needed to ignite curiosity in unconventional sources of data.

In conclusion, the enigmatic relationship between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands warrants further investigation, as the potential implications of this connection could be truly electrifying. This study opens the door to a stimulating debate about the electrifying interplay of seemingly unrelated variables and encourages future researchers to embrace the 'electrifying' potential of unearthing unexpected connections in data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'bing' and Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production to uncover potential connections. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities. The implications of this unexpected association are discussed, and potential explanations for this puzzling phenomenon are humorously considered. This study not only sheds light on the quirky interplay between online search trends and electricity generation but also highlights the potential for novel, offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary data analyses.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the correlation between Google searches for 'Bing' and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands is surprisingly scant, mirroring the perplexing nature of this correlation. However, the authors find that Smith et al. (2015) observed a similar trend in their study on internet search behavior and renewable energy adoption, albeit without delving into specific search engine queries. Doe and Jones (2018) also touched upon the use of online data in understanding consumer behavior and energy consumption patterns, but their work did not directly address the curious case of 'Bing' searches and electricity generation.
Expanding the search to related fields, a number of non-fiction books shed some light on tangentially connected topics. In "Electricity and Society" by Sparks (2017), the author explores the social implications of electricity generation, with a few shocking revelations along the way. Moreover, "Search Engine Secrets Unveiled" by Query (2019) delves into the algorithms and user behaviors that underpin Google searches, providing valuable insights that are tangentially related to our investigation.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the novels "Power Play" by Watts (2016) and "Electric Dreams" by Tesla (2014) offer imaginative interpretations of electricity's influence on human affairs, albeit in highly speculative contexts.
Additionally, a brief exploration of popular media sources uncovers potential inspirations for further investigation. The TV shows "Electricity Mysteries Unplugged" and "The Bing Theory" provide entertaining yet tangentially relevant narratives that showcase the intersection of electricity and digital phenomena.
The dearth of direct literature on the specific correlation between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands underscores the novelty and peculiarity of our research endeavor. Nonetheless, these diverse sources provide illuminating perspectives and enthralling contexts for our investigation into this 'shockingly' peculiar association.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the connection between Google searches for "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands has left us both electrified and bemused. After analyzing data from 2004 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8166530 indicated that approximately 81.7% of the variance in electricity generation is associated with the fluctuations in "Bing" searches. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 assures us that this finding is not just a shocking coincidence.
Our findings are neatly encapsulated in the scatterplot displayed in Fig. 1, which visually portrays the compelling relationship between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation. The trendline demonstrates an almost magnetic attraction between the two variables, with each surge in 'Bing' searches seemingly sparking a surge in electricity production.
While it may seem that the only "shocking" aspect of this research is the unexpected correlation itself, we must not underestimate the power of statistical analysis and cross-disciplinary exploration. It appears that the electrifying undercurrents of 'Bing' searches may have more far-reaching implications than initially anticipated.
Our findings not only offer a fresh perspective on the interplay between online search behavior and electricity generation but also serve as a 'jolting' reminder of the potential for unanticipated connections in the world of data analysis. The implications of this surprising correlation are staggering, and we dare say that unraveling the mysteries of "Bing" searches may just be the spark needed to ignite curiosity in unconventional sources of data.
In conclusion, the enigmatic relationship between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands warrants further investigation, as the potential implications of this connection could be truly electrifying. This study opens the door to a stimulating debate about the electrifying interplay of seemingly unrelated variables and encourages future researchers to embrace the 'electrifying' potential of unearthing unexpected connections in data analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between Google searches for "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands have left us positively charged with excitement. Our findings not only validate the initial hunch that there may be something illuminating to unearth from this peculiar association but also shed some much-needed light on the potential interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and the compellingly low p-value less than 0.01 align with prior research that hinted at the influence of online search behavior on energy-related variables. Smith et al.'s (2015) observance of a similar trend in internet search behavior and renewable energy adoption and Doe and Jones' (2018) exploration of online data in understanding consumer behavior and energy consumption patterns indirectly support our findings, albeit without delving into the enigmatic realm of 'Bing' searches. The peculiar absence of comprehensive literature on this topic parallels the enigmatic nature of our investigation, underscoring the novelty and potential significance of our findings.

It is electrifying to see how our results illuminate a startlingly cohesive relationship between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation. While some may think that the only "shocking" aspect of this research is the unexpected correlation itself, we must not overlook the energizing potential of uncovering such unconventional connections through rigorous statistical analysis.

The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 vividly encapsulates the magnetic attraction between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation, graphically displaying the intriguing dance between these seemingly unrelated variables. One might even say that it depicts a kind of "electrifying romance" between online search behavior and energy production.

This stupefying connection, while undoubtedly enigmatic, hints at the untapped potential of unearthing unexpected correlations in the world of data analysis. Our research serves as a potent reminder of the shockingly unanticipated connections that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disparate datasets, and it energizes the discussion on the broader implications of cross-disciplinary exploration.

In all, our findings tantalize the taste buds of curiosity, sparking a spirited debate about the electrifying interplay of seemingly unrelated variables. This study offers a powerful glimpse into the pulsating potential of unearthing novel insights from unconventional sources of data, ultimately fueling the ongoing discourse in the ever-energetic realm of cross-disciplinary exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'bing' and Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production to uncover potential connections. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities. The implications of this unexpected association are discussed, and potential explanations for this puzzling phenomenon are humorously considered. This study not only sheds light on the quirky interplay between online search trends and electricity generation but also highlights the potential for novel, offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary data analyses.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intricacies of modern life never cease to amaze, with the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena often leaving us scratching our heads in puzzlement. Our current curiosity was piqued by the mysterious association between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. One might assume that the only correlation between "Bing" and electricity lies in the endeavor to frantically power up devices to execute said searches. However, our analytical journey undertakes a deeper investigation into this perplexing relationship.
As we delve into this peculiar pairing, it is important to acknowledge the blend of humor and curiosity that prompted this research. It's not every day that one encounters a correlation as mystifying as the connection between an internet search engine and the generation of electricity in a tropical paradise. Nonetheless, armed with data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we are intent on shedding light on this enigmatic correlation, despite the potential for a few electrifyingly punny one-liners.
The allure of this investigation lies in untangling the web of factors that contribute to such an unexpected trend. Is it purely happenstance, or is there a deeper, more electrifying underlying mechanism at play? Our inquiry seeks to not only highlight this intriguing correlation but also to spark a lively and spirited debate about the potential implications of such offbeat discoveries. After all, the 'shocking' juxtaposition of 'Bing' searches and electricity generation may well illuminate the electricity of curiosity and the 'power' of unearthing unexpected connections.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the connection between Google searches for "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands has left us both electrified and bemused. After analyzing data from 2004 to 2021, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8166530 indicated that approximately 81.7% of the variance in electricity generation is associated with the fluctuations in "Bing" searches. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 assures us that this finding is not just a shocking coincidence.
Our findings are neatly encapsulated in the scatterplot displayed in Fig. 1, which visually portrays the compelling relationship between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation. The trendline demonstrates an almost magnetic attraction between the two variables, with each surge in 'Bing' searches seemingly sparking a surge in electricity production.
While it may seem that the only "shocking" aspect of this research is the unexpected correlation itself, we must not underestimate the power of statistical analysis and cross-disciplinary exploration. It appears that the electrifying undercurrents of 'Bing' searches may have more far-reaching implications than initially anticipated.
Our findings not only offer a fresh perspective on the interplay between online search behavior and electricity generation but also serve as a 'jolting' reminder of the potential for unanticipated connections in the world of data analysis. The implications of this surprising correlation are staggering, and we dare say that unraveling the mysteries of "Bing" searches may just be the spark needed to ignite curiosity in unconventional sources of data.
In conclusion, the enigmatic relationship between 'Bing' searches and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands warrants further investigation, as the potential implications of this connection could be truly electrifying. This study opens the door to a stimulating debate about the electrifying interplay of seemingly unrelated variables and encourages future researchers to embrace the 'electrifying' potential of unearthing unexpected connections in data analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the strange confluence of Google searches for "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands has both illuminated and 'surged' our understanding of seemingly unrelated phenomena. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 between these variables sparks curiosity and 'electric' enthusiasm for uncovering unconventional connections. The tantalizing p-value of less than 0.01 reinforces the notion that this is not merely a 'shocking' coincidence but rather a thought-provoking juxtaposition.

Our findings, perhaps even more 'energizing' than a fully charged battery, highlight the potential for offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary analysis. This peculiar association not only leaves us 'amp'ed up about the interplay between online search behavior and electricity production but also jolts us into contemplating the 'power' of uncovering unexpected correlations. The potential implications of this connection are 'electrifying,' and our investigation may serve as a 'circuit'-breaking moment in the world of data analysis.

However, it is our firm assertion that no further research is needed in this particular area. As captivating as the connection between "Bing" searches and electricity generation may be, the potential for puns and wordplay is notably depleted, and we must resist the temptation to stretch this 'current' any further. Instead, we encourage future researchers to seek out similarly enigmatic correlations and 'charge' forward in uncovering unexpected associations in the ever-expanding realm of data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Eclectic Energy Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Renewable Energy Analytics and Data Science (SREADS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Baffling Bing: British Virgin Islands' Bizarre Balance between 'Bing' Searches and Blended Electricity Generation with an abstract of In this research paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic "Bing" and electricity generation in the British Virgin Islands. Utilizing data from Google Trends and the Energy Information Administration, we delve into over 17 years of search behavior and electricity production to uncover potential connections. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.9036885 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2004 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong relationship between the two seemingly disparate entities. The implications of this unexpected association are discussed, and potential explanations for this puzzling phenomenon are humorously considered. This study not only sheds light on the quirky interplay between online search trends and electricity generation but also highlights the potential for novel, offbeat insights from cross-disciplinary data analyses.

ChatGPT:

"Bing searches", "electricity generation", "Google Trends", "British Virgin Islands", "correlation coefficient", "p-value", "data analysis", "cross-disciplinary research", "energy information administration", "search behavior", "novel insights"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'bing'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'bing' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'bing'

Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in British Virgin Islands in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands

Correlation r = 0.9036885 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8166530 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'bing') over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-7. 0.0000002741545837865422500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 2.7E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,647,577 random variables You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Google searches for 'bing' (Rel. search volume)54.833335.666676.833337.9166739.556.916761.166759.256560.833354.916739.166733.166731.2531.833332.583328.1667
Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands (Billion kWh)0.0420.0930.10.1040.1160.150.1851110.1813610.1863610.1863610.1867290.1975280.1994780.1402080.1378580.1387980.1318620.14027




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5,4.83333,5.66667,6.83333,7.91667,39.5,56.9167,61.1667,59.25,65,60.8333,54.9167,39.1667,33.1667,31.25,31.8333,32.5833,28.1667,])
array_2 = np.array([0.042,0.093,0.1,0.104,0.116,0.15,0.185111,0.181361,0.186361,0.186361,0.186729,0.197528,0.199478,0.140208,0.137858,0.138798,0.131862,0.14027,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'bing'"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in British Virgin Islands"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 1106 · Black Variable ID: 1399 · Red Variable ID: 23542
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0