about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,097 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point and the second variable is Google searches for 'shook'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point might have led to a decrease in intense moments, causing fewer people to experience being 'shook' while watching the games. It's a classic case of lacrosse-induced shock therapy!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image representing a sports equipment store in a cyber folk style. On one end, display a prominent sign announcing the National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point with a clear decrease in the number. On the opposite end, depict a row of phones with the word 'shook' typed into the search bar, accompanied by a visible decrease in the number of searches. The items in this area appear slightly less touched and pushed aside, suggesting a decreased demand. The collective disappointment is evident as a group of people discusses the champions' performance. Capture the atmosphere of diminished interest and anticipation, amplifying the impact of the decreasing final point on related events and products in the store. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: A decrease in National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point has caused a decrease in searches for 'shook,' as the nation's disappointment in the final outcome has left them less interested in all things related to intense reactions. The correlation stems from the fact that when the champions' final performance was lackluster, the nation collectively felt less shook, leading to a decrease in searches for the term. This has led to calls for the lacrosse champions to step up their game in order to keep the nation sufficiently shook for the foreseeable future.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Low poly Psychedelic Cybernetic art Photorealism
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. A decrease in National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point has caused a decrease in searches for 'shook,' as the nation's disappointment in the final outcome has left them less interested in all things related to intense reactions. The correlation stems from the fact that when the champions' final performance was lackluster, the nation collectively felt less shook, leading to a decrease in searches for the term. This has led to calls for the lacrosse champions to step up their game in order to keep the nation sufficiently shook for the foreseeable future.
ChatGPT: Imagine a display at a sports equipment store. On one side, there is a big sign displaying the National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point, showing a decrease in the number. On the other side, there are a bunch of phones with the word 'shook' typed into the search bar, and there is a visible decrease in the number of searches. The items seem slightly less touched and pushed aside as if less needed or wanted. The decrease in the lacrosse champions' final point has clearly affected the interest in things related to intense reactions, as there is an overall collective sense of disappointment. A group of people can be heard discussing the need for the champions to step up their game.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a display at a sports equipment store. On one side, there is a big sign displaying the National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point, showing a decrease in the number. On the other side, there are a bunch of phones with the word 'shook' typed into the search bar, and there is a visible decrease in the number of searches. The items seem slightly less touched and pushed aside as if less needed or wanted. The decrease in the lacrosse champions' final point has clearly affected the interest in things related to intense reactions, as there is an overall collective sense of disappointment. A group of people can be heard discussing the need for the champions to step up their game. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image representing a sports equipment store in a cyber folk style. On one end, display a prominent sign announcing the National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point with a clear decrease in the number. On the opposite end, depict a row of phones with the word 'shook' typed into the search bar, accompanied by a visible decrease in the number of searches. The items in this area appear slightly less touched and pushed aside, suggesting a decreased demand. The collective disappointment is evident as a group of people discusses the champions' performance. Capture the atmosphere of diminished interest and anticipation, amplifying the impact of the decreasing final point on related events and products in the store.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point caused shook (Google searches for 'shook') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection

Journal of Sports Psychology and Social Media Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point and Google searches for 'shook'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the perplexing correlation between the final point scored by the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". Using data extracted from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough investigation covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence of the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's almost like they were caught in a "lacrosst" connection! Our study sheds light on this quirky relationship, offering valuable insights into the interconnectedness of sports victories and internet search behavior. We also couldn’t resist a good father's joke by saying that these results have, quite literally, left us "shook"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point and Google searches for 'shook'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the perplexing correlation between the final point scored by the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". Using data extracted from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough investigation covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence of the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's almost like they were caught in a "lacrosst" connection! Our study sheds light on this quirky relationship, offering valuable insights into the interconnectedness of sports victories and internet search behavior. We also couldn’t resist a good father's joke by saying that these results have, quite literally, left us "shook"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of sports, it is not uncommon for unpredictable phenomena to occur. From buzzer-beating shots to underdog victories, the realm of competition never fails to surprise and captivate. As researchers, we seek to unravel the mysteries behind such extraordinary events, and our latest endeavor delves into the enthralling connection between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". It's as if the lacrosse champions’ performances have the power to shake up more than just the scoreboard—perhaps they're also shaking up internet users' curiosity! Talk about a true "shook"-wave in action!

The casual observer may raise an eyebrow at the seemingly absurd juxtaposition of lacrosse and internet search trends. After all, what could the triumph on the lacrosse field possibly have to do with online queries for being "shook"? However, as researchers, we never back away from a challenge and are always ready to tackle even the most unexpected correlations. This study breaks new ground by embracing the unconventional, and we couldn't resist adding a bit of "stick" to the traditional academic field—insert "groan" here!

Our investigation spans nearly two decades, from 2004 to 2022, and scrutinizes data meticulously extracted from reliable sources, including Wikipedia and Google Trends. Our mission was clear: to uncover the elusive link between the final point scored in the National Lacrosse Championship and public interest in the colloquial term "shook". It's almost as if the lacrosse champions' defining moments have the strength to send shockwaves through the fingers, inspiring hordes of perplexed keyboard warriors on a search for solidarity in being "shook"!

In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this lighthearted yet enlightening journey, as we explore the peculiar, yet statistically robust, correlation between these unanticipated bedfellows. We promise to keep the puns coming—with no "stick" in sight! Stick with us as we embark on a quest to reveal the intricacies of human behavior in response to athletic achievement and find out what really makes us "shook”!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point and Google searches for 'shook'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the perplexing correlation between the final point scored by the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". Using data extracted from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough investigation covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence of the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's almost like they were caught in a "lacrosst" connection! Our study sheds light on this quirky relationship, offering valuable insights into the interconnectedness of sports victories and internet search behavior. We also couldn’t resist a good father's joke by saying that these results have, quite literally, left us "shook"!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of sports, it is not uncommon for unpredictable phenomena to occur. From buzzer-beating shots to underdog victories, the realm of competition never fails to surprise and captivate. As researchers, we seek to unravel the mysteries behind such extraordinary events, and our latest endeavor delves into the enthralling connection between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". It's as if the lacrosse champions’ performances have the power to shake up more than just the scoreboard—perhaps they're also shaking up internet users' curiosity! Talk about a true "shook"-wave in action!
The casual observer may raise an eyebrow at the seemingly absurd juxtaposition of lacrosse and internet search trends. After all, what could the triumph on the lacrosse field possibly have to do with online queries for being "shook"? However, as researchers, we never back away from a challenge and are always ready to tackle even the most unexpected correlations. This study breaks new ground by embracing the unconventional, and we couldn't resist adding a bit of "stick" to the traditional academic field—insert "groan" here!
Our investigation spans nearly two decades, from 2004 to 2022, and scrutinizes data meticulously extracted from reliable sources, including Wikipedia and Google Trends. Our mission was clear: to uncover the elusive link between the final point scored in the National Lacrosse Championship and public interest in the colloquial term "shook". It's almost as if the lacrosse champions' defining moments have the strength to send shockwaves through the fingers, inspiring hordes of perplexed keyboard warriors on a search for solidarity in being "shook"!
In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this lighthearted yet enlightening journey, as we explore the peculiar, yet statistically robust, correlation between these unanticipated bedfellows. We promise to keep the puns coming—with no "stick" in sight! Stick with us as we embark on a quest to reveal the intricacies of human behavior in response to athletic achievement and find out what really makes us "shook”!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The link between sports events and public sentiment has long intrigued scholars across various disciplines. In “The Journal of Sport Psychology,” Smith and Doe explore the psychological impact of sports victories on public mood and behavior, finding compelling evidence to suggest that significant wins can indeed influence societal emotions and subsequent actions. As we delve into the unexpected correlation between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and Google searches for "shook," it becomes evident that the interplay of athletic achievements and online trends may hold surprising insights.

Turning to the realm of internet culture and search behavior, Jones’ analysis in "Online Search Trends in the Digital Age" provides a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing keyword popularity and user engagement. The study emphasizes the dynamic nature of online trends, shedding light on how societal changes and cultural phenomena can shape search patterns. Our investigation into the connection between lacrosse championships and "shook" Google searches stands at the intersection of sports triumphs and digital curiosity, weaving an intricate web of correlations that is as unexpected as it is perplexing.

In "The Lacrosse Chronicles: From Field to Fame," renowned sports historian Mary Smith offers a detailed account of the cultural impact of lacrosse championships, tracing the evolution of the sport's significance in popular imagination. While Smith's work primarily focuses on the historical and sociocultural dimensions of lacrosse, it inadvertently sparks contemplation on the broader implications of athletic achievements in shaping public discourse and online behavior. Plus, we can't resist a good dad joke, so we’ll throw in a "lacrosse" pun every chance we get!

Expanding beyond non-fiction literature, the fictional realm also presents intriguing explorations of unexpected connections. In Michael Doe's novel "The Mystery of Search Street," the protagonist uncovers a baffling correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena, echoing our own quest to unravel the enigmatic bond between lacrosse championships and "shook" Google searches. While the characters' adventures may be fictional, the parallels to our study offer an amusing reminder that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction—in this case, almost as strange as the connection between a lacrosse final point and "shook" Google searches!

Taking inspiration from the world of board games, "Clue: Lacrosse Edition" playfully challenges players to solve the mystery of unlikely connections, inviting them to uncover the hidden link between lacrosse victories and online buzz. As we navigate our own investigative journey, we find ourselves embracing the whimsical spirit of unraveling unforeseen correlations, all while infusing our study with lightheartedness and a dash of humor. It's almost as if we're racing against time—not to crack the case of a murder, but to decipher the amusing puzzle of lacrosse champions' final points and "shook" Google searches.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point and Google searches for 'shook'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the perplexing correlation between the final point scored by the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". Using data extracted from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough investigation covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence of the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's almost like they were caught in a "lacrosst" connection! Our study sheds light on this quirky relationship, offering valuable insights into the interconnectedness of sports victories and internet search behavior. We also couldn’t resist a good father's joke by saying that these results have, quite literally, left us "shook"!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of sports, it is not uncommon for unpredictable phenomena to occur. From buzzer-beating shots to underdog victories, the realm of competition never fails to surprise and captivate. As researchers, we seek to unravel the mysteries behind such extraordinary events, and our latest endeavor delves into the enthralling connection between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". It's as if the lacrosse champions’ performances have the power to shake up more than just the scoreboard—perhaps they're also shaking up internet users' curiosity! Talk about a true "shook"-wave in action!
The casual observer may raise an eyebrow at the seemingly absurd juxtaposition of lacrosse and internet search trends. After all, what could the triumph on the lacrosse field possibly have to do with online queries for being "shook"? However, as researchers, we never back away from a challenge and are always ready to tackle even the most unexpected correlations. This study breaks new ground by embracing the unconventional, and we couldn't resist adding a bit of "stick" to the traditional academic field—insert "groan" here!
Our investigation spans nearly two decades, from 2004 to 2022, and scrutinizes data meticulously extracted from reliable sources, including Wikipedia and Google Trends. Our mission was clear: to uncover the elusive link between the final point scored in the National Lacrosse Championship and public interest in the colloquial term "shook". It's almost as if the lacrosse champions' defining moments have the strength to send shockwaves through the fingers, inspiring hordes of perplexed keyboard warriors on a search for solidarity in being "shook"!
In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this lighthearted yet enlightening journey, as we explore the peculiar, yet statistically robust, correlation between these unanticipated bedfellows. We promise to keep the puns coming—with no "stick" in sight! Stick with us as we embark on a quest to reveal the intricacies of human behavior in response to athletic achievement and find out what really makes us "shook”!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the enigmatic connection between the final point of National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for "shook," we employed a charismatically convoluted approach that we affectionately refer to as the "Lax-a-daisy-cal Search Blitz." Picture this: a team of researchers armed with lacrosse sticks and laptops, navigating the labyrinthine corridors of statistics, data analysis, and dad jokes. Our methodology incorporated a blend of quantitative analysis and cheeky humor, ensuring that our investigation embraced both rigor and levity.

First, we meticulously gathered data from 2004 to 2022 from authoritative sources, including Wikipedia and Google Trends. We then engaged in a ceremonial "Face Off" between data points, symbolizing the commencement of our analytical journey. Dad joke alert: It was certainly quite a "face off" with spreadsheets instead of lacrosse balls!

Our next step involved conducting a thorough exploration of the statistical relationship between the final point of National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for "shook." This entailed employing Pearson's correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables. We aimed to discover whether the surge in "shook" searches could be attributed to the nail-biting finales of the National Lacrosse Championship games or if it was merely a statistical mirage. We just couldn't resist the temptation to "stick" a pun in there!

Additionally, we employed multiple regression analysis to account for potential confounding variables, such as the overall popularity of lacrosse and the broader context of internet searches. By teasing out these factors, we aspired to gain a deeper understanding of the nuanced dynamics at play. It's fair to say that we were determined to untangle this "lax"-ative puzzle!

To consolidate our findings, we conducted a series of sensitivity analyses and bootstrapping procedures. The goal was to assess the robustness of our results and ensure that our conclusions were not merely a fluke. At this juncture, we couldn't help but think of these statistical tests as the "goal-line stands" of our methodology—steadfast and unyielding in the face of uncertainty.

Finally, to infuse a touch of whimsy into our otherwise austere methodology, we resorted to anecdotal evidence and personal accounts of lacrosse enthusiasts and "shook" searchers. We sought to capture the human element of our investigation, recognizing that statistical analyses alone could not encapsulate the full essence of this captivating and quirky correlation. These anecdotes served as our "MVP" (Most Valuable Puns) throughout the study, adding a dash of charm to our research.

In synthesizing these methods, we not only aimed to demystify the perplexing relationship between lacrosse triumphs and internet intrigue but also to leave a lasting impression on the scientific community—a punny legacy, if you will.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point and Google searches for 'shook'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9080987, r-squared of 0.8246433, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the perplexing correlation between the final point scored by the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". Using data extracted from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough investigation covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence of the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's almost like they were caught in a "lacrosst" connection! Our study sheds light on this quirky relationship, offering valuable insights into the interconnectedness of sports victories and internet search behavior. We also couldn’t resist a good father's joke by saying that these results have, quite literally, left us "shook"!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of sports, it is not uncommon for unpredictable phenomena to occur. From buzzer-beating shots to underdog victories, the realm of competition never fails to surprise and captivate. As researchers, we seek to unravel the mysteries behind such extraordinary events, and our latest endeavor delves into the enthralling connection between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". It's as if the lacrosse champions’ performances have the power to shake up more than just the scoreboard—perhaps they're also shaking up internet users' curiosity! Talk about a true "shook"-wave in action!
The casual observer may raise an eyebrow at the seemingly absurd juxtaposition of lacrosse and internet search trends. After all, what could the triumph on the lacrosse field possibly have to do with online queries for being "shook"? However, as researchers, we never back away from a challenge and are always ready to tackle even the most unexpected correlations. This study breaks new ground by embracing the unconventional, and we couldn't resist adding a bit of "stick" to the traditional academic field—insert "groan" here!
Our investigation spans nearly two decades, from 2004 to 2022, and scrutinizes data meticulously extracted from reliable sources, including Wikipedia and Google Trends. Our mission was clear: to uncover the elusive link between the final point scored in the National Lacrosse Championship and public interest in the colloquial term "shook". It's almost as if the lacrosse champions' defining moments have the strength to send shockwaves through the fingers, inspiring hordes of perplexed keyboard warriors on a search for solidarity in being "shook"!
In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this lighthearted yet enlightening journey, as we explore the peculiar, yet statistically robust, correlation between these unanticipated bedfellows. We promise to keep the puns coming—with no "stick" in sight! Stick with us as we embark on a quest to reveal the intricacies of human behavior in response to athletic achievement and find out what really makes us "shook”!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from 2004 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9080987, with an r-squared value of 0.8246433, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical evidence suggests a robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's like the lacrosse champions were scoring more than just points—they were also scoring high on the "shook" scale! You could say they really "stuck" it to the competition, and now they've "stuck" it to the world of internet searches too!

Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between the final point of the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for "shook". The figure clearly showcases the linear trend, reinforcing the compelling correlation uncovered in this study. It's almost like the data points are forming a lacrosse stick on the graph, highlighting the striking connection that has "netted" our attention—excuse the pun; we couldn't help ourselves!

These findings provide novel insights into the influence of sports achievements on internet search behavior, uncovering an unexpected yet intriguing relationship with broader implications for understanding human responses to athletic triumphs. It's as if the lacrosse champions' victories "stick" with people in ways we never imagined, leading them to seek comfort and connection through the concept of being "shook". After all, it's not every day that a sports event has the power to send shockwaves through the virtual realm. This study offers a unique perspective on the nuanced interactions between sports outcomes and digital discourse, reminding us that sometimes the most outlandish connections can yield the most meaningful discoveries.

In summary, the results of this investigation signify a groundbreaking leap in comprehending the interplay between athletic accomplishments and online behavior. The statistical evidence points to a substantial correlation between the final point of the National Lacrosse Champions and Google searches for "shook", challenging conventional wisdom and opening new avenues for future exploration. Who knew that scoring a goal in a lacrosse game could leave the digital world feeling so "shook"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point and Google searches for 'shook'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the perplexing correlation between the final point scored by the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". Using data extracted from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough investigation covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence of the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's almost like they were caught in a "lacrosst" connection! Our study sheds light on this quirky relationship, offering valuable insights into the interconnectedness of sports victories and internet search behavior. We also couldn’t resist a good father's joke by saying that these results have, quite literally, left us "shook"!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The link between sports events and public sentiment has long intrigued scholars across various disciplines. In “The Journal of Sport Psychology,” Smith and Doe explore the psychological impact of sports victories on public mood and behavior, finding compelling evidence to suggest that significant wins can indeed influence societal emotions and subsequent actions. As we delve into the unexpected correlation between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and Google searches for "shook," it becomes evident that the interplay of athletic achievements and online trends may hold surprising insights.
Turning to the realm of internet culture and search behavior, Jones’ analysis in "Online Search Trends in the Digital Age" provides a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing keyword popularity and user engagement. The study emphasizes the dynamic nature of online trends, shedding light on how societal changes and cultural phenomena can shape search patterns. Our investigation into the connection between lacrosse championships and "shook" Google searches stands at the intersection of sports triumphs and digital curiosity, weaving an intricate web of correlations that is as unexpected as it is perplexing.
In "The Lacrosse Chronicles: From Field to Fame," renowned sports historian Mary Smith offers a detailed account of the cultural impact of lacrosse championships, tracing the evolution of the sport's significance in popular imagination. While Smith's work primarily focuses on the historical and sociocultural dimensions of lacrosse, it inadvertently sparks contemplation on the broader implications of athletic achievements in shaping public discourse and online behavior. Plus, we can't resist a good dad joke, so we’ll throw in a "lacrosse" pun every chance we get!
Expanding beyond non-fiction literature, the fictional realm also presents intriguing explorations of unexpected connections. In Michael Doe's novel "The Mystery of Search Street," the protagonist uncovers a baffling correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena, echoing our own quest to unravel the enigmatic bond between lacrosse championships and "shook" Google searches. While the characters' adventures may be fictional, the parallels to our study offer an amusing reminder that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction—in this case, almost as strange as the connection between a lacrosse final point and "shook" Google searches!
Taking inspiration from the world of board games, "Clue: Lacrosse Edition" playfully challenges players to solve the mystery of unlikely connections, inviting them to uncover the hidden link between lacrosse victories and online buzz. As we navigate our own investigative journey, we find ourselves embracing the whimsical spirit of unraveling unforeseen correlations, all while infusing our study with lightheartedness and a dash of humor. It's almost as if we're racing against time—not to crack the case of a murder, but to decipher the amusing puzzle of lacrosse champions' final points and "shook" Google searches.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 2004 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9080987, with an r-squared value of 0.8246433, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical evidence suggests a robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's like the lacrosse champions were scoring more than just points—they were also scoring high on the "shook" scale! You could say they really "stuck" it to the competition, and now they've "stuck" it to the world of internet searches too!
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between the final point of the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for "shook". The figure clearly showcases the linear trend, reinforcing the compelling correlation uncovered in this study. It's almost like the data points are forming a lacrosse stick on the graph, highlighting the striking connection that has "netted" our attention—excuse the pun; we couldn't help ourselves!
These findings provide novel insights into the influence of sports achievements on internet search behavior, uncovering an unexpected yet intriguing relationship with broader implications for understanding human responses to athletic triumphs. It's as if the lacrosse champions' victories "stick" with people in ways we never imagined, leading them to seek comfort and connection through the concept of being "shook". After all, it's not every day that a sports event has the power to send shockwaves through the virtual realm. This study offers a unique perspective on the nuanced interactions between sports outcomes and digital discourse, reminding us that sometimes the most outlandish connections can yield the most meaningful discoveries.
In summary, the results of this investigation signify a groundbreaking leap in comprehending the interplay between athletic accomplishments and online behavior. The statistical evidence points to a substantial correlation between the final point of the National Lacrosse Champions and Google searches for "shook", challenging conventional wisdom and opening new avenues for future exploration. Who knew that scoring a goal in a lacrosse game could leave the digital world feeling so "shook"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the link between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for "shook" have left us feeling nothing short of, well, "shook"! Our findings not only corroborate earlier research on the psychological impact of sports victories on public mood and behavior, but also shed light on the whimsical yet significant influence of athletic achievements on internet search behavior. It seems that the lacrosse champions' final points were not just racking up scores on the field, but were also racking up search hits in the digital sphere! It's almost like they were playing a double game—both on the turf and online. We definitely scored big with this unexpected discovery!

The correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emphasize the robust connection between the two seemingly disparate variables, reinforcing the idea that sports triumphs can have a palpable impact on virtual engagement. These results have, quite literally, caught us off guard and left us "shook"—not just by the correlation, but by the sheer unexpectedness of it all! It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden Easter egg in the complex maze of statistical analyses.

Our study not only builds on prior research into the psychological effects of sports victories but also highlights the intriguing interplay of athletic accomplishments and digital curiosity. It's like we're deciphering the quirky dance of the "lacrosse" ball and the "shook" search term, unveiling an enigmatic relationship that challenges traditional notions of cause and effect. Who would've thought that a winning lacrosse goal could trigger an avalanche of "shook" searches? We didn't just hit the bullseye with this study; we scored a hat trick of unexpected insights!

Moreover, the strong positive relationship depicted in the scatterplot further emphasizes the undeniable connection between the final point of the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for "shook". It's almost as if the data points are engaged in a playful game of catch, tossing the spotlight from the victory celebrations to the virtual arena of intrigue. We were certainly caught off guard by the intensity of the correlation—just like an unexpected goal in the closing minutes of a thrilling match!

In essence, our study not only validates earlier findings but also paves the way for future explorations into the uncharted territory of sports influence on digital behavior. Just as the lacrosse champions elevated their game to reach new heights, we too have magnified our understanding of the nuanced interactions between athletic triumphs and online engagement. Who knew that a sport as traditional as lacrosse could send shockwaves through the digital world? It seems that when it comes to uncovering unexpected connections, the game is never truly over!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point and Google searches for 'shook'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the perplexing correlation between the final point scored by the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". Using data extracted from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough investigation covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence of the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's almost like they were caught in a "lacrosst" connection! Our study sheds light on this quirky relationship, offering valuable insights into the interconnectedness of sports victories and internet search behavior. We also couldn’t resist a good father's joke by saying that these results have, quite literally, left us "shook"!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of sports, it is not uncommon for unpredictable phenomena to occur. From buzzer-beating shots to underdog victories, the realm of competition never fails to surprise and captivate. As researchers, we seek to unravel the mysteries behind such extraordinary events, and our latest endeavor delves into the enthralling connection between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". It's as if the lacrosse champions’ performances have the power to shake up more than just the scoreboard—perhaps they're also shaking up internet users' curiosity! Talk about a true "shook"-wave in action!
The casual observer may raise an eyebrow at the seemingly absurd juxtaposition of lacrosse and internet search trends. After all, what could the triumph on the lacrosse field possibly have to do with online queries for being "shook"? However, as researchers, we never back away from a challenge and are always ready to tackle even the most unexpected correlations. This study breaks new ground by embracing the unconventional, and we couldn't resist adding a bit of "stick" to the traditional academic field—insert "groan" here!
Our investigation spans nearly two decades, from 2004 to 2022, and scrutinizes data meticulously extracted from reliable sources, including Wikipedia and Google Trends. Our mission was clear: to uncover the elusive link between the final point scored in the National Lacrosse Championship and public interest in the colloquial term "shook". It's almost as if the lacrosse champions' defining moments have the strength to send shockwaves through the fingers, inspiring hordes of perplexed keyboard warriors on a search for solidarity in being "shook"!
In the pages that follow, we invite you to join us on this lighthearted yet enlightening journey, as we explore the peculiar, yet statistically robust, correlation between these unanticipated bedfellows. We promise to keep the puns coming—with no "stick" in sight! Stick with us as we embark on a quest to reveal the intricacies of human behavior in response to athletic achievement and find out what really makes us "shook”!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 2004 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9080987, with an r-squared value of 0.8246433, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistical evidence suggests a robust connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's like the lacrosse champions were scoring more than just points—they were also scoring high on the "shook" scale! You could say they really "stuck" it to the competition, and now they've "stuck" it to the world of internet searches too!
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between the final point of the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for "shook". The figure clearly showcases the linear trend, reinforcing the compelling correlation uncovered in this study. It's almost like the data points are forming a lacrosse stick on the graph, highlighting the striking connection that has "netted" our attention—excuse the pun; we couldn't help ourselves!
These findings provide novel insights into the influence of sports achievements on internet search behavior, uncovering an unexpected yet intriguing relationship with broader implications for understanding human responses to athletic triumphs. It's as if the lacrosse champions' victories "stick" with people in ways we never imagined, leading them to seek comfort and connection through the concept of being "shook". After all, it's not every day that a sports event has the power to send shockwaves through the virtual realm. This study offers a unique perspective on the nuanced interactions between sports outcomes and digital discourse, reminding us that sometimes the most outlandish connections can yield the most meaningful discoveries.
In summary, the results of this investigation signify a groundbreaking leap in comprehending the interplay between athletic accomplishments and online behavior. The statistical evidence points to a substantial correlation between the final point of the National Lacrosse Champions and Google searches for "shook", challenging conventional wisdom and opening new avenues for future exploration. Who knew that scoring a goal in a lacrosse game could leave the digital world feeling so "shook"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has revealed a striking correlation between the final point scored by National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". This unexpected nexus between a sports victory and online behavior highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate elements in modern society. It seems that the champions didn't just win games; they also "scored" big in the realm of internet trending topics. These results prove the old adage that a well-played game can really "shake" things up, and clearly, the lacrosse champions have been shaking screens as well as spectators with their triumphs. In the spirit of our findings, let's hope the champions have also "shaken" up the search engine algorithms in our favor!

Our findings provide a valuable contribution to the understanding of human responses to athletic achievements and their reverberations in the virtual sphere. Who would have thought that a sporting event could "stick" with internet users in such a profound way? As researchers, we've certainly learned that sometimes the most unexpected correlations lead to the most "punderful" discoveries. It's clear that this study has "stuck" a chord not just with us, but with the broader academic community!

Based on our comprehensive analysis, we assert that further research in this area is unnecessary. It's safe to say that we've thoroughly "sticked" it to this topic and have "shook" the academic world with our findings. After all, who needs further investigation when the results are this "punnedamental"?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sports Psychology and Social Media Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sports Anthropology and Internet Influence


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stick It to Me: The Final Point of National Lacrosse Champions and the Shook Google Searches Connection with an abstract of This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the perplexing correlation between the final point scored by the National Lacrosse Champions and the frequency of Google searches for the term "shook". Using data extracted from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough investigation covering the years 2004 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9080987 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing compelling evidence of the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's almost like they were caught in a "lacrosst" connection! Our study sheds light on this quirky relationship, offering valuable insights into the interconnectedness of sports victories and internet search behavior. We also couldn’t resist a good father's joke by saying that these results have, quite literally, left us "shook"!

ChatGPT:

National Lacrosse Champions, final point, Google searches, correlation, analysis, connection, Wikipedia data, Google Trends, relationship, sports victories, internet search behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point
Detailed data title: National Lacrosse Champions' Final Points
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point

Google searches for 'shook'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'shook' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'shook'

Correlation r = 0.9080987 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8246433 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'shook') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-8. 0.0000000777669683554220700000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 7.8E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,858,930 random variables You don't actually need 12 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point (Points)141916131412158911222222002
Google searches for 'shook' (Rel. search volume)75.2584.7576.2569.083366.416772.7569.583363.583357.2555.916752.166752.583350.583360.333356.083351.333345.333341.916742.6667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([14,19,16,13,14,12,15,8,9,11,2,2,2,2,2,2,0,0,2,])
array_2 = np.array([75.25,84.75,76.25,69.0833,66.4167,72.75,69.5833,63.5833,57.25,55.9167,52.1667,52.5833,50.5833,60.3333,56.0833,51.3333,45.3333,41.9167,42.6667,])
array_1_name = "National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'shook'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 1097 · Black Variable ID: 133 · Red Variable ID: 1372
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0