about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,090 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Williamsport, Pennsylvania and the second variable is Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2008, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in Williamsport degraded, it created a unique phenomenon where the tennis balls started to develop extra "smogspin," throwing off Serena's opponents and giving her the advantage she needed to reach the Grand Slam finals more frequently.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A scene from Skyrim] An enchanting tennis court materializes in the misty realm of Skyrim, nestled within the rugged landscape near a hazy, smog-filled town. Serena Williams, a formidable warrior, stands ready on the court, her powerful form exuding confidence as she prepares to serve. As she launches the ball into the thick, swirling air, it seems to take on a mystical quality, spinning and curving unpredictably amidst the particles. Her opponents, clad in armor, struggle to anticipate the ball's erratic movements, giving Serena an otherworldly advantage in the ancient game. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Increase in Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania caused Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams to also increase due to the heightened level of particulate matter in the atmosphere providing an unexpected advantage by adding a little extra "spin" to her serves and "float" to her volleys, leaving opponents gasping for air and leading to her swift victories.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech Pop art Oragami Psychedelic A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Increase in Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania caused Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams to also increase due to the heightened level of particulate matter in the atmosphere providing an unexpected advantage by adding a little extra "spin" to her serves and "float" to her volleys, leaving opponents gasping for air and leading to her swift victories.
ChatGPT: Imagine a tennis court in Williamsport, Pennsylvania with a hazy, smoggy sky overhead. The air is thick with tiny particles swirling around. Serena Williams serves the ball with a powerful swing, and as it travels through the air, the particles seem to give it an extra twist, making it spin and curve unpredictably. Her opponents struggle to track the ball as it seems to "float" and dip unexpectedly. The air quality affects the game, giving Serena an unexpected advantage and leading to her swift and dominating victories.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a tennis court in Williamsport, Pennsylvania with a hazy, smoggy sky overhead. The air is thick with tiny particles swirling around. Serena Williams serves the ball with a powerful swing, and as it travels through the air, the particles seem to give it an extra twist, making it spin and curve unpredictably. Her opponents struggle to track the ball as it seems to "float" and dip unexpectedly. The air quality affects the game, giving Serena an unexpected advantage and leading to her swift and dominating victories. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A scene from Skyrim] An enchanting tennis court materializes in the misty realm of Skyrim, nestled within the rugged landscape near a hazy, smog-filled town. Serena Williams, a formidable warrior, stands ready on the court, her powerful form exuding confidence as she prepares to serve. As she launches the ball into the thick, swirling air, it seems to take on a mystical quality, spinning and curving unpredictably amidst the particles. Her opponents, clad in armor, struggle to anticipate the ball's erratic movements, giving Serena an otherworldly advantage in the ancient game.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Williamsport, Pennsylvania caused Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances

Journal of Athlete Atmospheric Performance

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania and Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2008.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances

[[ABSTRACT]]
Air quality is a crucial determinant of human health and well-being, but could it also influence the performance of tennis superstars? This study investigates the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by the renowned athlete Serena Williams. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we applied statistical methods to assess this curious connection.

Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008, indicating a substantial relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. Amidst the haze of pollution, it appears that Serena may have been serving up more than just aces!

This analysis sheds light on the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, opening the door for further investigation into the interplay between air quality and sports outcomes. While the air in Williamsport may have been "foul," the correlation we uncovered is anything but "foul play"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania and Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances

[[ABSTRACT]]
Air quality is a crucial determinant of human health and well-being, but could it also influence the performance of tennis superstars? This study investigates the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by the renowned athlete Serena Williams. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we applied statistical methods to assess this curious connection.

Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008, indicating a substantial relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. Amidst the haze of pollution, it appears that Serena may have been serving up more than just aces!

This analysis sheds light on the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, opening the door for further investigation into the interplay between air quality and sports outcomes. While the air in Williamsport may have been "foul," the correlation we uncovered is anything but "foul play"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the old adage goes, "Love means nothing in tennis, but air quality means everything." Okay, maybe that's not exactly how the saying goes, but our study delves into the unexpected connection between air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the grand performance of tennis legend Serena Williams in Grand Slam finals. It's a match made in statistical heaven - or should I say, "Tennis-court" covariance?

Air quality is a critical factor influencing human health and athletic performance, and Williamsport, Pennsylvania, has not been immune to the challenges of smog and air pollution. And speaking of challenges, conducting this research felt a bit like navigating through a dense fog of data and statistics. But let's not "lob" any complaints just yet; we'll "ace" this investigation with a "forehand" grasp of the scientific method.

The relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements has long been a topic of fascination, and our study aims to serve up some compelling evidence linking poor air quality to Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. We're about to volley some unexpected findings your way, so get ready to "break point" - or maybe we should say "data point"?

By harnessing a unique blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Serena Williams' impressive track record at Grand Slam events, we aimed to smash any preconceived notions and "net" a deeper understanding of the potential impact of air quality on sports outcomes. Our findings promise to be a breath of fresh air - unless, of course, you happen to be in Williamsport.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania and Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances

[[ABSTRACT]]
Air quality is a crucial determinant of human health and well-being, but could it also influence the performance of tennis superstars? This study investigates the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by the renowned athlete Serena Williams. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we applied statistical methods to assess this curious connection.

Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008, indicating a substantial relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. Amidst the haze of pollution, it appears that Serena may have been serving up more than just aces!

This analysis sheds light on the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, opening the door for further investigation into the interplay between air quality and sports outcomes. While the air in Williamsport may have been "foul," the correlation we uncovered is anything but "foul play"!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "Love means nothing in tennis, but air quality means everything." Okay, maybe that's not exactly how the saying goes, but our study delves into the unexpected connection between air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the grand performance of tennis legend Serena Williams in Grand Slam finals. It's a match made in statistical heaven - or should I say, "Tennis-court" covariance?
Air quality is a critical factor influencing human health and athletic performance, and Williamsport, Pennsylvania, has not been immune to the challenges of smog and air pollution. And speaking of challenges, conducting this research felt a bit like navigating through a dense fog of data and statistics. But let's not "lob" any complaints just yet; we'll "ace" this investigation with a "forehand" grasp of the scientific method.
The relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements has long been a topic of fascination, and our study aims to serve up some compelling evidence linking poor air quality to Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. We're about to volley some unexpected findings your way, so get ready to "break point" - or maybe we should say "data point"?
By harnessing a unique blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Serena Williams' impressive track record at Grand Slam events, we aimed to smash any preconceived notions and "net" a deeper understanding of the potential impact of air quality on sports outcomes. Our findings promise to be a breath of fresh air - unless, of course, you happen to be in Williamsport.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have examined the impact of air quality on human health and performance, shedding light on the pervasive influence of environmental factors on our well-being. In "Smith et al.'s groundbreaking study," the authors find a significant association between poor air quality and respiratory illnesses, highlighting the detrimental effects of pollution on local populations. Similarly, Doe and Jones' research underscores the detrimental effects of air pollution on cardiovascular health, emphasizing the far-reaching consequences of smog-ridden atmospheres.

But what about the impact of air quality on professional athletics, particularly in the realm of tennis? Enter the unconventional realm of sports science and environmental epidemiology. In our quest to explore this uncharted territory, we turned to non-fiction works such as "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Environmental Impacts" and "Tennis and the Environment: A Love-Love Match" to glean insights from established experts in the field.

However, it's not all serious scholarly pursuit in the pursuit of knowledge. We also dove into the fictional realm of literature, drawing inspiration from "A Breath of Fresh Air: A Tale of Pollution and Possibility" and "The Ace of Smog: A Tennis Mystery Novel." While these titles may not offer empirical evidence, they certainly serve to remind us of the pervasive influence of air quality on our collective imagination.

In our exploration of unconventional sources, we couldn't resist the alluring world of animated storytelling. As part of our exhaustive research, we even delved into the classic children's cartoon "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," where the indomitable Captain Planet battles environmental villains to protect the Earth. Who knew that our childhood entertainment could hold the key to understanding the potential impact of air quality on athletic prowess? As Captain Planet would say, "The power is yours" to uncover unexpected connections in the world around us.

Amidst the weighty tomes of academic research and the whimsical allure of fiction, our investigation into the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances reveals a compelling narrative that transcends the boundaries of traditional scholarly inquiry. Stay tuned as we uncover the truth behind Serena's formidable serves and the invisible hand of environmental influence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania and Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 1999 to 2008

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances

[[ABSTRACT]]
Air quality is a crucial determinant of human health and well-being, but could it also influence the performance of tennis superstars? This study investigates the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by the renowned athlete Serena Williams. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we applied statistical methods to assess this curious connection.

Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008, indicating a substantial relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. Amidst the haze of pollution, it appears that Serena may have been serving up more than just aces!

This analysis sheds light on the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, opening the door for further investigation into the interplay between air quality and sports outcomes. While the air in Williamsport may have been "foul," the correlation we uncovered is anything but "foul play"!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "Love means nothing in tennis, but air quality means everything." Okay, maybe that's not exactly how the saying goes, but our study delves into the unexpected connection between air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the grand performance of tennis legend Serena Williams in Grand Slam finals. It's a match made in statistical heaven - or should I say, "Tennis-court" covariance?
Air quality is a critical factor influencing human health and athletic performance, and Williamsport, Pennsylvania, has not been immune to the challenges of smog and air pollution. And speaking of challenges, conducting this research felt a bit like navigating through a dense fog of data and statistics. But let's not "lob" any complaints just yet; we'll "ace" this investigation with a "forehand" grasp of the scientific method.
The relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements has long been a topic of fascination, and our study aims to serve up some compelling evidence linking poor air quality to Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. We're about to volley some unexpected findings your way, so get ready to "break point" - or maybe we should say "data point"?
By harnessing a unique blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Serena Williams' impressive track record at Grand Slam events, we aimed to smash any preconceived notions and "net" a deeper understanding of the potential impact of air quality on sports outcomes. Our findings promise to be a breath of fresh air - unless, of course, you happen to be in Williamsport.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To conduct our investigation into the curious correlation between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances, we navigated through a labyrinth of data with the grace and precision of a seasoned tennis player - or at least attempted to. Our research design was as meticulously structured as a perfectly lined-up set of tennis balls at the start of a match, with a hint of whimsy akin to a surprise underhand serve.

First, we gathered historical air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, specifically focusing on Williamsport, Pennsylvania, for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008. We carefully sifted through this plethora of data, much like a tennis player navigating through a minefield of tricky serves, to identify patterns and trends in air pollution levels. This process was about as thrilling as a sudden death deuce in a championship match - only, in our case, it was a sudden surge in data points that had us on edge.

Simultaneously, we meticulously gathered information on Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances during the same time frame from reliable sources such as Wikipedia. We embarked on this endeavor with as much determination as Serena stepping onto the court for a high-stakes final, determined to uncover any hints of correlation between her stellar performances and the air quality in Williamsport.

Once we had amassed the relevant datasets, we engaged in a rigorous process of data cleaning and pre-processing, ensuring that our statistical models didn't suffer from any unforced errors or netted points. We meticulously combed through the data, eliminating outliers and inconsistencies as if we were tirelessly inspecting a disputed line call.

Next, we applied a series of advanced statistical methods, including correlation analysis and regression modeling, to examine the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam finals' performances. We were as thorough in our analysis as Serena is in her strategic shot placements, leaving no stone unturned in uncovering any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

Our statistical analyses were conducted with the precision of a skilled tennis player executing a perfectly timed serve, ensuring that our findings were not merely a lucky shot but rather a well-planned strategy. We calculated correlation coefficients with the same dedication that a tennis player devotes to perfecting their backhand, aiming to reveal the strength and direction of the relationship between air quality and Serena's performances.

Throughout this process, robust statistical tests were employed to establish the significance of any observed relationships, ensuring that our findings were as compelling as a dramatic tie-breaker in a championship match. We scrutinized our results with the same intensity that a hawk-eyed line judge watches each point, guaranteeing the validity and reliability of our conclusions.

In addition to our quantitative analyses, we incorporated qualitative insights from domain experts in environmental science and sports performance, seeking to gain a holistic understanding of the potential mechanisms underlying the observed correlation. Just as a seasoned tennis player might consult with their coach for strategic advice, we sought expert input to refine our interpretations and place our findings within the broader context of air quality and athletic achievement.

Our research methodology was designed to serve an ace in uncovering the intricate relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances, all while infusing a dash of scientific rigor and a volley of puns that might just leave you wondering, "Is there something in the air, or is it just a good ol' dad joke?"

Note: This methodology has been presented with the lightheartedness of a well-timed drop shot, aiming to maintain academic rigor while serving up a generous portion of humor and creativity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania and Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1999 to 2008, you found a correlation 0.8180735, r-squared of 0.6692442, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances

[[ABSTRACT]]
Air quality is a crucial determinant of human health and well-being, but could it also influence the performance of tennis superstars? This study investigates the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by the renowned athlete Serena Williams. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we applied statistical methods to assess this curious connection.

Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008, indicating a substantial relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. Amidst the haze of pollution, it appears that Serena may have been serving up more than just aces!

This analysis sheds light on the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, opening the door for further investigation into the interplay between air quality and sports outcomes. While the air in Williamsport may have been "foul," the correlation we uncovered is anything but "foul play"!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the old adage goes, "Love means nothing in tennis, but air quality means everything." Okay, maybe that's not exactly how the saying goes, but our study delves into the unexpected connection between air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the grand performance of tennis legend Serena Williams in Grand Slam finals. It's a match made in statistical heaven - or should I say, "Tennis-court" covariance?
Air quality is a critical factor influencing human health and athletic performance, and Williamsport, Pennsylvania, has not been immune to the challenges of smog and air pollution. And speaking of challenges, conducting this research felt a bit like navigating through a dense fog of data and statistics. But let's not "lob" any complaints just yet; we'll "ace" this investigation with a "forehand" grasp of the scientific method.
The relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements has long been a topic of fascination, and our study aims to serve up some compelling evidence linking poor air quality to Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. We're about to volley some unexpected findings your way, so get ready to "break point" - or maybe we should say "data point"?
By harnessing a unique blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Serena Williams' impressive track record at Grand Slam events, we aimed to smash any preconceived notions and "net" a deeper understanding of the potential impact of air quality on sports outcomes. Our findings promise to be a breath of fresh air - unless, of course, you happen to be in Williamsport.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data for the period from 1999 to 2008 revealed a striking correlation between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams. The correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 suggests a robust relationship, indicating that as air quality worsened, the likelihood of Serena Williams making it to the finals of Grand Slam tournaments increased. It seems that the phrase "love is in the air" takes on a whole new meaning with this study - although in this case, it's more like "pollution is in the air"!

The r-squared value of 0.6692442 further reinforces the strength of the relationship we observed. This means that approximately 66.92% of the variability in Serena Williams' Grand Slam final appearances can be explained by the variation in air quality in Williamsport during the specified time frame. It's clear that there's more than just "air" serving as a common denominator here!

The statistical significance of our findings is evident from the p-value, which was less than 0.01. This indicates that the observed relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. It's as unlikely as a tennis ball bouncing in a straight line on a windy day - simply "un-fore-hand-able"!

To visually encapsulate the strength of the relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the positive correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot is as clear as Serena's win at the 1999 US Open! It paints a compelling picture of how the degradation of air quality in Williamsport seemingly propelled Serena Williams towards her appearances in Grand Slam finals. It's almost as though the air pollution acted as her unseen doubles partner on the court - talk about an "air-assist" in the game of tennis!

In conclusion, our results provide tangible evidence of the substantial connection between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. This study not only underscores the impact of environmental factors on athletic achievements but also serves as a testament to the surprising intersections between seemingly unrelated variables. As we serve up these unprecedented findings, it's clear that the link between smog and serves is more than just a "racket"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania and Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances

[[ABSTRACT]]
Air quality is a crucial determinant of human health and well-being, but could it also influence the performance of tennis superstars? This study investigates the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by the renowned athlete Serena Williams. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we applied statistical methods to assess this curious connection.

Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008, indicating a substantial relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. Amidst the haze of pollution, it appears that Serena may have been serving up more than just aces!

This analysis sheds light on the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, opening the door for further investigation into the interplay between air quality and sports outcomes. While the air in Williamsport may have been "foul," the correlation we uncovered is anything but "foul play"!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have examined the impact of air quality on human health and performance, shedding light on the pervasive influence of environmental factors on our well-being. In "Smith et al.'s groundbreaking study," the authors find a significant association between poor air quality and respiratory illnesses, highlighting the detrimental effects of pollution on local populations. Similarly, Doe and Jones' research underscores the detrimental effects of air pollution on cardiovascular health, emphasizing the far-reaching consequences of smog-ridden atmospheres.
But what about the impact of air quality on professional athletics, particularly in the realm of tennis? Enter the unconventional realm of sports science and environmental epidemiology. In our quest to explore this uncharted territory, we turned to non-fiction works such as "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Environmental Impacts" and "Tennis and the Environment: A Love-Love Match" to glean insights from established experts in the field.
However, it's not all serious scholarly pursuit in the pursuit of knowledge. We also dove into the fictional realm of literature, drawing inspiration from "A Breath of Fresh Air: A Tale of Pollution and Possibility" and "The Ace of Smog: A Tennis Mystery Novel." While these titles may not offer empirical evidence, they certainly serve to remind us of the pervasive influence of air quality on our collective imagination.
In our exploration of unconventional sources, we couldn't resist the alluring world of animated storytelling. As part of our exhaustive research, we even delved into the classic children's cartoon "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," where the indomitable Captain Planet battles environmental villains to protect the Earth. Who knew that our childhood entertainment could hold the key to understanding the potential impact of air quality on athletic prowess? As Captain Planet would say, "The power is yours" to uncover unexpected connections in the world around us.
Amidst the weighty tomes of academic research and the whimsical allure of fiction, our investigation into the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances reveals a compelling narrative that transcends the boundaries of traditional scholarly inquiry. Stay tuned as we uncover the truth behind Serena's formidable serves and the invisible hand of environmental influence.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data for the period from 1999 to 2008 revealed a striking correlation between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams. The correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 suggests a robust relationship, indicating that as air quality worsened, the likelihood of Serena Williams making it to the finals of Grand Slam tournaments increased. It seems that the phrase "love is in the air" takes on a whole new meaning with this study - although in this case, it's more like "pollution is in the air"!
The r-squared value of 0.6692442 further reinforces the strength of the relationship we observed. This means that approximately 66.92% of the variability in Serena Williams' Grand Slam final appearances can be explained by the variation in air quality in Williamsport during the specified time frame. It's clear that there's more than just "air" serving as a common denominator here!
The statistical significance of our findings is evident from the p-value, which was less than 0.01. This indicates that the observed relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. It's as unlikely as a tennis ball bouncing in a straight line on a windy day - simply "un-fore-hand-able"!
To visually encapsulate the strength of the relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the positive correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot is as clear as Serena's win at the 1999 US Open! It paints a compelling picture of how the degradation of air quality in Williamsport seemingly propelled Serena Williams towards her appearances in Grand Slam finals. It's almost as though the air pollution acted as her unseen doubles partner on the court - talk about an "air-assist" in the game of tennis!
In conclusion, our results provide tangible evidence of the substantial connection between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. This study not only underscores the impact of environmental factors on athletic achievements but also serves as a testament to the surprising intersections between seemingly unrelated variables. As we serve up these unprecedented findings, it's clear that the link between smog and serves is more than just a "racket"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study unveil a compelling relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances, reinforcing and extending prior research on the impact of environmental factors on athletic achievements. Our findings support the existing literature that has delineated the adverse effects of air pollution on human health and performance. The strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 in our analysis echoes the resonance of previous studies, illustrating how air quality can influence diverse domains of human activity, from respiratory health to athletic prowess. Perhaps we've stumbled upon the "air-raising" secret behind Serena's stellar performances!

The robust statistical significance of our results aligns with the gravity of the subject matter, emphasizing the non-trivial nature of the relationship between air quality and sports outcomes. It's as clear as a cloudless sky that our findings go beyond mere coincidence, disproving any notion that they might be as "volatile" as atmospheric conditions. Our study supports the notion that air quality is not only a breath of fresh air in the world of environmental science but also a critical factor in shaping athletic excellence. After all, who knew that the air in Williamsport could play such a "vital" role in Serena's tennis triumphs!

The r-squared value of 0.6692442 further bolsters the efficacy of our model in explaining the variability in Serena Williams' Grand Slam final appearances, highlighting the substantial influence of air quality in Williamsport during the specified timeframe. It's a numerical testament to the palpable impact of environmental variables on an athlete's journey to the pinnacle of professional tennis. This finding might prompt a new tennis rule - no "serves" allowed in smoggy areas, to level the playing field for all competitors!

The visual representation provided by our scatterplot elegantly captures the positive correlation between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. This graphical depiction of our findings is not just a "smashing" visual aid; it also conveys the compelling narrative of our research. It's almost as if the data points themselves are serving up an ace every time they align with the trends of air quality. Who knew that a scatterplot could "serve" as a form of visual entertainment in the realm of statistical analysis?

In sum, our study adds an intriguing dimension to the empirical landscape, showcasing the unexpected connection between environmental quality and professional sports. By unveiling the hidden "hazards" of poor air quality in Williamsport on Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances, our research accentuates the need for holistic consideration of environmental factors in the realm of sports science. As we navigate through these "air-raising" findings, it's apparent that the nuances of air quality extend beyond respiratory health, permeating even the realm of athletic excellence. Who knew that the "smoggy" air in Williamsport could be a grand slam contender in its own right!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania and Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances

[[ABSTRACT]]
Air quality is a crucial determinant of human health and well-being, but could it also influence the performance of tennis superstars? This study investigates the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by the renowned athlete Serena Williams. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we applied statistical methods to assess this curious connection.

Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008, indicating a substantial relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. Amidst the haze of pollution, it appears that Serena may have been serving up more than just aces!

This analysis sheds light on the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, opening the door for further investigation into the interplay between air quality and sports outcomes. While the air in Williamsport may have been "foul," the correlation we uncovered is anything but "foul play"!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "Love means nothing in tennis, but air quality means everything." Okay, maybe that's not exactly how the saying goes, but our study delves into the unexpected connection between air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the grand performance of tennis legend Serena Williams in Grand Slam finals. It's a match made in statistical heaven - or should I say, "Tennis-court" covariance?
Air quality is a critical factor influencing human health and athletic performance, and Williamsport, Pennsylvania, has not been immune to the challenges of smog and air pollution. And speaking of challenges, conducting this research felt a bit like navigating through a dense fog of data and statistics. But let's not "lob" any complaints just yet; we'll "ace" this investigation with a "forehand" grasp of the scientific method.
The relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements has long been a topic of fascination, and our study aims to serve up some compelling evidence linking poor air quality to Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. We're about to volley some unexpected findings your way, so get ready to "break point" - or maybe we should say "data point"?
By harnessing a unique blend of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Serena Williams' impressive track record at Grand Slam events, we aimed to smash any preconceived notions and "net" a deeper understanding of the potential impact of air quality on sports outcomes. Our findings promise to be a breath of fresh air - unless, of course, you happen to be in Williamsport.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data for the period from 1999 to 2008 revealed a striking correlation between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by Serena Williams. The correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 suggests a robust relationship, indicating that as air quality worsened, the likelihood of Serena Williams making it to the finals of Grand Slam tournaments increased. It seems that the phrase "love is in the air" takes on a whole new meaning with this study - although in this case, it's more like "pollution is in the air"!
The r-squared value of 0.6692442 further reinforces the strength of the relationship we observed. This means that approximately 66.92% of the variability in Serena Williams' Grand Slam final appearances can be explained by the variation in air quality in Williamsport during the specified time frame. It's clear that there's more than just "air" serving as a common denominator here!
The statistical significance of our findings is evident from the p-value, which was less than 0.01. This indicates that the observed relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. It's as unlikely as a tennis ball bouncing in a straight line on a windy day - simply "un-fore-hand-able"!
To visually encapsulate the strength of the relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the positive correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot is as clear as Serena's win at the 1999 US Open! It paints a compelling picture of how the degradation of air quality in Williamsport seemingly propelled Serena Williams towards her appearances in Grand Slam finals. It's almost as though the air pollution acted as her unseen doubles partner on the court - talk about an "air-assist" in the game of tennis!
In conclusion, our results provide tangible evidence of the substantial connection between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. This study not only underscores the impact of environmental factors on athletic achievements but also serves as a testament to the surprising intersections between seemingly unrelated variables. As we serve up these unprecedented findings, it's clear that the link between smog and serves is more than just a "racket"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has served up some compelling evidence that poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances are as interconnected as a tennis ball and a racket – they just can't seem to stay apart! Our findings suggest a strong correlation, with the statistical analysis giving us more confidence than a tennis player on match point. It's almost as if the smog in Williamsport was whispering, "Serena, you've got this!" Talk about an unexpected doubles partner on the court!

Our results, while surprising, reinforce the idea that environmental factors can have a significant impact on athletic achievements. The relationship we uncovered is so substantial that it's practically "un-fore-hand-able," and the statistical significance is as clear as the chalk mark on the baseline. It's safe to say that in the game of statistical analysis, we've aced this one!

While this study may seem like a wild, unexpected serve, it's also a testament to the wonderful world of research where even the most unlikely connections can come to light. And with that, we firmly assert that no further research is needed in this area. We've hit the statistical sweet spot, and it's time to call "game, set, and match" on this investigation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Athlete Atmospheric Performance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Atmospheric Research and Athletic Performance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Smog and Serves: The Impact of Air Quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania on Serena Williams' Grand Slam Performances with an abstract of Air quality is a crucial determinant of human health and well-being, but could it also influence the performance of tennis superstars? This study investigates the relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, and the Grand Slam finals played by the renowned athlete Serena Williams. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we applied statistical methods to assess this curious connection.
Our findings reveal a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8180735 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1999 to 2008, indicating a substantial relationship between poor air quality in Williamsport and Serena Williams' Grand Slam performances. Amidst the haze of pollution, it appears that Serena may have been serving up more than just aces!
This analysis sheds light on the potential influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, opening the door for further investigation into the interplay between air quality and sports outcomes. While the air in Williamsport may have been "foul," the correlation we uncovered is anything but "foul play"!

ChatGPT:

Serena Williams, air quality, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, Grand Slam, tennis, EPA data, statistical methods, correlation coefficient, pollution, environmental factors, athletic performance, sports outcomes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Williamsport, Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Williamsport, PA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Williamsport, Pennsylvania

Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams

Correlation r = 0.8180735 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6692442 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Williamsport, Pennsylvania) over the 10 years from 1999 through 2008.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0038. 0.0038234907430988660000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.38% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 262 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.39, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1999200020012002200320042005200620072008
Air pollution in Williamsport, Pennsylvania (Bad air quality days)00.4484310.8474582.521011.6736400.854701000.858369
Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams (Finals)1013211012




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0.448431,0.847458,2.52101,1.67364,0,0.854701,0,0,0.858369,])
array_2 = np.array([1,0,1,3,2,1,1,0,1,2,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Williamsport, Pennsylvania"
array_2_name = "Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 1090 · Black Variable ID: 21449 · Red Variable ID: 126
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0