about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,084 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'is this a wart' and the second variable is The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the public became more proficient at identifying warts, they started avoiding biology classes in fear of catching something. With a shrinking student population, the demand for biological science teachers in Georgia also waned. It seems like the phrase "knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad, and philosophy is wondering if that means ketchup is a smoothie" has been upgraded to "knowledge is identifying a wart, wisdom is staying away from it, and biology is finding a different profession."

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a realistic image of university students studying at a Georgia campus. The students are seated around a table with textbooks and notebooks. They are seen focusing intently on their studies. In the background, a computer screen displays a graph of decreasing "is this a wart" Google searches, indicating a shift in priorities. Another graph indicates a decrease in available teaching positions for biological science in the state, suggesting the impact of students' academic pursuits. The scene should capture the bustling activity of the room. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: A decrease in "is this a wart" Google searches has caused a decrease in the number of university biological science teachers in Georgia because potential teachers were spending too much time self-diagnosing instead of pursuing their education and career goals. As the search volume decreased, more aspiring biological science teachers were able to focus on their studies and join the workforce, resulting in a decline in available teaching positions.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism Realistic inspired by bauhaus Vaporwave Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. A decrease in "is this a wart" Google searches has caused a decrease in the number of university biological science teachers in Georgia because potential teachers were spending too much time self-diagnosing instead of pursuing their education and career goals. As the search volume decreased, more aspiring biological science teachers were able to focus on their studies and join the workforce, resulting in a decline in available teaching positions.
ChatGPT: Imagine a group of university students in Georgia gathered around a study table, textbooks and notebooks spread out in front of them. As they diligently focus on their studies, the room is bustling with activity. In the background, a computer screen shows a decreasing trend in "is this a wart" Google searches, suggesting a shift in priorities from self-diagnosis to academic pursuit. At the same time, the number of available teaching positions for biological science in the state also declines, reflecting the impact of students focusing on their education and career goals instead of indulging in the online searches.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a group of university students in Georgia gathered around a study table, textbooks and notebooks spread out in front of them. As they diligently focus on their studies, the room is bustling with activity. In the background, a computer screen shows a decreasing trend in "is this a wart" Google searches, suggesting a shift in priorities from self-diagnosis to academic pursuit. At the same time, the number of available teaching positions for biological science in the state also declines, reflecting the impact of students focusing on their education and career goals instead of indulging in the online searches. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a realistic image of university students studying at a Georgia campus. The students are seated around a table with textbooks and notebooks. They are seen focusing intently on their studies. In the background, a computer screen displays a graph of decreasing "is this a wart" Google searches, indicating a shift in priorities. Another graph indicates a decrease in available teaching positions for biological science in the state, suggesting the impact of students' academic pursuits. The scene should capture the bustling activity of the room.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in is this a wart (Google searches for 'is this a wart') caused The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts

The Journal of Irreverent Scientific Discoveries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'is this a wart' and The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the peculiar correlation between the volume of Google searches for "is this a wart" and the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia. Our team embarked on this whimsical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of dermatological curiosity and higher education. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings suggest a surprisingly strong connection between online concerns about skin blemishes and the population of biology educators in the peach state. We navigate through the data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ultimately shedding light on this curious relationship and prompting laughter, bewilderment, and perhaps the occasional "Eureka!" in the world of scientific inquiries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'is this a wart' and The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the peculiar correlation between the volume of Google searches for "is this a wart" and the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia. Our team embarked on this whimsical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of dermatological curiosity and higher education. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings suggest a surprisingly strong connection between online concerns about skin blemishes and the population of biology educators in the peach state. We navigate through the data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ultimately shedding light on this curious relationship and prompting laughter, bewilderment, and perhaps the occasional "Eureka!" in the world of scientific inquiries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome, fellow researchers, to a journey that will defy all expectations and leave you scratching your head in wonder (or perhaps just scratching). If you've ever found yourself pondering the confounding mystery of human behavior, or more specifically, the relationship between internet search queries and the academic pursuits of Georgia's biology enthusiasts, then you're in for a treat.

As scientists, we are accustomed to pursuing the most serious and weighty topics imaginable, tackling big questions with intellect, purpose, and the occasional lab explosion (we're looking at you, Dr. Bunsen). But today, we embark on a quest that is neither grand nor extraordinary in the traditional sense. The seemingly mundane and frivolous search term "is this a wart" has inexplicably crossed paths with the noble pursuit of biological education, creating a mash-up that is both perplexing and endlessly entertaining.

As we delve into this intersection of dermatological dilemmas and scholarly pursuits, rest assured that we will guide you through the mirthful maze of data analysis, statistical manipulations, and puns that only a true connoisseur of research can appreciate. So buckle up and prepare to experience a rollercoaster of emotions – from amusement to astonishment – as we unravel the threads of this unlikely connection between internet queries and the science guys of Georgia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'is this a wart' and The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the peculiar correlation between the volume of Google searches for "is this a wart" and the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia. Our team embarked on this whimsical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of dermatological curiosity and higher education. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings suggest a surprisingly strong connection between online concerns about skin blemishes and the population of biology educators in the peach state. We navigate through the data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ultimately shedding light on this curious relationship and prompting laughter, bewilderment, and perhaps the occasional "Eureka!" in the world of scientific inquiries.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow researchers, to a journey that will defy all expectations and leave you scratching your head in wonder (or perhaps just scratching). If you've ever found yourself pondering the confounding mystery of human behavior, or more specifically, the relationship between internet search queries and the academic pursuits of Georgia's biology enthusiasts, then you're in for a treat.
As scientists, we are accustomed to pursuing the most serious and weighty topics imaginable, tackling big questions with intellect, purpose, and the occasional lab explosion (we're looking at you, Dr. Bunsen). But today, we embark on a quest that is neither grand nor extraordinary in the traditional sense. The seemingly mundane and frivolous search term "is this a wart" has inexplicably crossed paths with the noble pursuit of biological education, creating a mash-up that is both perplexing and endlessly entertaining.
As we delve into this intersection of dermatological dilemmas and scholarly pursuits, rest assured that we will guide you through the mirthful maze of data analysis, statistical manipulations, and puns that only a true connoisseur of research can appreciate. So buckle up and prepare to experience a rollercoaster of emotions – from amusement to astonishment – as we unravel the threads of this unlikely connection between internet queries and the science guys of Georgia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study "The Link Between Online Dermatological Inquiries and Academic Employment," Smith and Doe investigate the enigmatic relationship between dermatology-related Google searches and the employment patterns of biological science teachers in various regions of the United States. They scrutinize the potential influence of online curiosity about skin blemishes on the decision-making process of individuals pursuing careers in the biological sciences. This compelling study laid the groundwork for our subsequent exploration of this quirky correlation.

Furthermore, Jones and Smith, in their seminal work "Cyber Queries and Pedagogical Pathways," delve into the impact of internet search trends on educational demographics. They deftly navigate through the labyrinth of online queries to uncover unexpected connections with the professional trajectories of educators, shedding light on the intersection of digital inquiries and academic vocations.

Venturing into non-fiction literature relevant to our subject, the comprehensively researched "The Skin You're In" by Dr. Jane Dermis provides invaluable insights into the psychology of individuals seeking answers to dermatological concerns, potentially illuminating the motivation behind the popular phrase "is this a wart." Likewise, "Biology: The Essential Guide" by Dr. Gene Pool offers a comprehensive overview of the biological sciences, providing a backdrop for understanding the scholarly pursuits of individuals intrigued by skin irregularities.

Moving into the realm of fiction, "The Curious Case of the Botanical Biologist" by Arthur Flora explores the intricacies of botanical studies, hinting at the curious intersections between scientific curiosity and the mysteries of the human epidermis. Similarly, "The Secret Life of Cells" by Stella Derm offers a whimsical account of cellular dynamics, inspiring contemplation about the peculiarities of human inquiries into dermatological anomalies.

In a somewhat tangential but undeniably relevant deviation, the cinematic masterpiece "Finding Nemo" intricately weaves together a narrative of unexpected encounters and thematic explorations of unfamiliar terrain, mirroring the unexpected overlaps we have uncovered between online searches and biological science education. Additionally, "Doctor Strange" masterfully delves into the enigmatic world of medicine and mysticism, offering an imaginative analogy for the perplexing correlation at the heart of our investigation.

Embracing the eccentricity of our research topic, we take delight in the diverse tapestry of literary and cinematic works that reflect, however tangentially, the whimsical nature of our discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'is this a wart' and The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the peculiar correlation between the volume of Google searches for "is this a wart" and the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia. Our team embarked on this whimsical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of dermatological curiosity and higher education. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings suggest a surprisingly strong connection between online concerns about skin blemishes and the population of biology educators in the peach state. We navigate through the data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ultimately shedding light on this curious relationship and prompting laughter, bewilderment, and perhaps the occasional "Eureka!" in the world of scientific inquiries.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow researchers, to a journey that will defy all expectations and leave you scratching your head in wonder (or perhaps just scratching). If you've ever found yourself pondering the confounding mystery of human behavior, or more specifically, the relationship between internet search queries and the academic pursuits of Georgia's biology enthusiasts, then you're in for a treat.
As scientists, we are accustomed to pursuing the most serious and weighty topics imaginable, tackling big questions with intellect, purpose, and the occasional lab explosion (we're looking at you, Dr. Bunsen). But today, we embark on a quest that is neither grand nor extraordinary in the traditional sense. The seemingly mundane and frivolous search term "is this a wart" has inexplicably crossed paths with the noble pursuit of biological education, creating a mash-up that is both perplexing and endlessly entertaining.
As we delve into this intersection of dermatological dilemmas and scholarly pursuits, rest assured that we will guide you through the mirthful maze of data analysis, statistical manipulations, and puns that only a true connoisseur of research can appreciate. So buckle up and prepare to experience a rollercoaster of emotions – from amusement to astonishment – as we unravel the threads of this unlikely connection between internet queries and the science guys of Georgia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
To unravel the enigmatic link between "is this a wart" and the scholarly shenanigans of Georgia's biology buffs, our team embarked on a wild data collection adventure. We scoured the digital wilderness of Google Trends, analyzing search volumes for the aforementioned dermatological quandary from the year 2004 to 2022. Our journey through this uncanny virtual terrain was filled with insights into the ebb and flow of public curiosity—we encountered peaks and valleys in search activity, much like the ridges and troughs of a sine wave. Alongside our virtual escapades, we also sought refuge in the Bureau of Labor Statistics, extracting employment data concerning the valiant biological science educators populating the peach state.

Quantitative Analysis:
Upon our return from the tumultuous seas of data collection, we established a sturdy quantitative framework to measure the magnitude of the observed correlation. Employing statistical tools including regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and hypothesis testing, we navigated through the treacherous terrains of numbers, equations, and the occasional encounter with rogue outliers. Like intrepid cartographers of the scientific realm, we sought to chart the extent of the curious bond between epidermal uncertainties and scholarly vocations.

Statistical Model Building:
In our pursuit of understanding the unlikely harmony between skin-related queries and the bio-savvy denizens of Georgia, we erected a statistical model that encapsulated the essence of this peculiar correlation. Drawing inspiration from the intricate mechanisms of biological systems, we engineered a statistical concoction infused with the spirit of quirkiness and lightheartedness. Our model captured the dance of data points with whimsical elegance, depicting the synergistic tango between dermatological musings and academic aspirations.

Peer Review and Jocular Commentary:
In adherence to the time-honored traditions of scientific inquiry, we submitted our findings to the discerning gaze of esteemed colleagues for peer review. However, recognizing the exceptional nature of our inquiry, we encouraged reviewers to infuse their feedback with a touch of humor, puns, and perhaps the occasional dab of whimsy. The resulting synthesis of jocular commentary and scholarly critique transformed the review process into a delightful symphony of wit and erudition, further enlivening our exploration into the unexpected bond between Google queries and the illustrious science aficionados gracing Georgia's university classrooms.

In conclusion, our methodology was a merry cavalcade through the realms of data, statistics, and scientific inquiry, guided by the irrepressible spirit of curiosity and a fondness for the occasional shenanigan.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'is this a wart' and The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8690697, r-squared of 0.7552822, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the peculiar correlation between the volume of Google searches for "is this a wart" and the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia. Our team embarked on this whimsical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of dermatological curiosity and higher education. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings suggest a surprisingly strong connection between online concerns about skin blemishes and the population of biology educators in the peach state. We navigate through the data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ultimately shedding light on this curious relationship and prompting laughter, bewilderment, and perhaps the occasional "Eureka!" in the world of scientific inquiries.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, fellow researchers, to a journey that will defy all expectations and leave you scratching your head in wonder (or perhaps just scratching). If you've ever found yourself pondering the confounding mystery of human behavior, or more specifically, the relationship between internet search queries and the academic pursuits of Georgia's biology enthusiasts, then you're in for a treat.
As scientists, we are accustomed to pursuing the most serious and weighty topics imaginable, tackling big questions with intellect, purpose, and the occasional lab explosion (we're looking at you, Dr. Bunsen). But today, we embark on a quest that is neither grand nor extraordinary in the traditional sense. The seemingly mundane and frivolous search term "is this a wart" has inexplicably crossed paths with the noble pursuit of biological education, creating a mash-up that is both perplexing and endlessly entertaining.
As we delve into this intersection of dermatological dilemmas and scholarly pursuits, rest assured that we will guide you through the mirthful maze of data analysis, statistical manipulations, and puns that only a true connoisseur of research can appreciate. So buckle up and prepare to experience a rollercoaster of emotions – from amusement to astonishment – as we unravel the threads of this unlikely connection between internet queries and the science guys of Georgia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between Google searches for "is this a wart" and the number of university biological science teachers in Georgia from 2004 to 2022 have left us both surprised and tickled pink (or perhaps pinkish-red, if we're discussing dermatological matters). Our analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8690697, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. To put it plainly, the connection is so strong that even the most skeptical of statisticians would have to exclaim, "Well, I wart-an expected that!"

In addition to the impressive correlation coefficient, the r-squared value of 0.7552822 further cemented the strength of this peculiar association. This means that approximately 75.53% of the variability in the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia can be explained by changes in the volume of searches for "is this a wart." Who would have thought that skin-related uncertainties could hold such sway over the academic career choices of the peach state's biology educators? It appears that when it comes to the whims of internet searchers, one might say that biological science teachers have truly made their mark!

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables. In other words, the likelihood of this substantial correlation occurring by mere chance is so slim that one might describe it as more elusive than the search for a proverbial needle in a digital haystack. It seems that the fingerprints of dermatological inquiries are all over the employment landscape of biological science education, leaving us to marvel at the intricacies of this unexpected nexus.

To visually capture the essence of this astonishing correlation, we present in Fig. 1 a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong and positive relationship between Google searches for "is this a wart" and the number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. The clusters of data points dance across the graph like synchronized swimmers in an unexpected water ballet, proving that when it comes to statistical intrigue, truth is often stranger than fiction.

In conclusion, our findings have brought to light a connection that transcends the realms of both skin-deep inquiry and scholarly pursuit. We hope that our revelatory results not only inspire scholarly contemplation but also elicit a chuckle or two at the sheer absurdity and wonder of our strangely interconnected world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'is this a wart' and The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the peculiar correlation between the volume of Google searches for "is this a wart" and the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia. Our team embarked on this whimsical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of dermatological curiosity and higher education. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings suggest a surprisingly strong connection between online concerns about skin blemishes and the population of biology educators in the peach state. We navigate through the data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ultimately shedding light on this curious relationship and prompting laughter, bewilderment, and perhaps the occasional "Eureka!" in the world of scientific inquiries.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study "The Link Between Online Dermatological Inquiries and Academic Employment," Smith and Doe investigate the enigmatic relationship between dermatology-related Google searches and the employment patterns of biological science teachers in various regions of the United States. They scrutinize the potential influence of online curiosity about skin blemishes on the decision-making process of individuals pursuing careers in the biological sciences. This compelling study laid the groundwork for our subsequent exploration of this quirky correlation.
Furthermore, Jones and Smith, in their seminal work "Cyber Queries and Pedagogical Pathways," delve into the impact of internet search trends on educational demographics. They deftly navigate through the labyrinth of online queries to uncover unexpected connections with the professional trajectories of educators, shedding light on the intersection of digital inquiries and academic vocations.
Venturing into non-fiction literature relevant to our subject, the comprehensively researched "The Skin You're In" by Dr. Jane Dermis provides invaluable insights into the psychology of individuals seeking answers to dermatological concerns, potentially illuminating the motivation behind the popular phrase "is this a wart." Likewise, "Biology: The Essential Guide" by Dr. Gene Pool offers a comprehensive overview of the biological sciences, providing a backdrop for understanding the scholarly pursuits of individuals intrigued by skin irregularities.
Moving into the realm of fiction, "The Curious Case of the Botanical Biologist" by Arthur Flora explores the intricacies of botanical studies, hinting at the curious intersections between scientific curiosity and the mysteries of the human epidermis. Similarly, "The Secret Life of Cells" by Stella Derm offers a whimsical account of cellular dynamics, inspiring contemplation about the peculiarities of human inquiries into dermatological anomalies.
In a somewhat tangential but undeniably relevant deviation, the cinematic masterpiece "Finding Nemo" intricately weaves together a narrative of unexpected encounters and thematic explorations of unfamiliar terrain, mirroring the unexpected overlaps we have uncovered between online searches and biological science education. Additionally, "Doctor Strange" masterfully delves into the enigmatic world of medicine and mysticism, offering an imaginative analogy for the perplexing correlation at the heart of our investigation.
Embracing the eccentricity of our research topic, we take delight in the diverse tapestry of literary and cinematic works that reflect, however tangentially, the whimsical nature of our discoveries.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between Google searches for "is this a wart" and the number of university biological science teachers in Georgia from 2004 to 2022 have left us both surprised and tickled pink (or perhaps pinkish-red, if we're discussing dermatological matters). Our analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8690697, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. To put it plainly, the connection is so strong that even the most skeptical of statisticians would have to exclaim, "Well, I wart-an expected that!"
In addition to the impressive correlation coefficient, the r-squared value of 0.7552822 further cemented the strength of this peculiar association. This means that approximately 75.53% of the variability in the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia can be explained by changes in the volume of searches for "is this a wart." Who would have thought that skin-related uncertainties could hold such sway over the academic career choices of the peach state's biology educators? It appears that when it comes to the whims of internet searchers, one might say that biological science teachers have truly made their mark!
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables. In other words, the likelihood of this substantial correlation occurring by mere chance is so slim that one might describe it as more elusive than the search for a proverbial needle in a digital haystack. It seems that the fingerprints of dermatological inquiries are all over the employment landscape of biological science education, leaving us to marvel at the intricacies of this unexpected nexus.
To visually capture the essence of this astonishing correlation, we present in Fig. 1 a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong and positive relationship between Google searches for "is this a wart" and the number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. The clusters of data points dance across the graph like synchronized swimmers in an unexpected water ballet, proving that when it comes to statistical intrigue, truth is often stranger than fiction.
In conclusion, our findings have brought to light a connection that transcends the realms of both skin-deep inquiry and scholarly pursuit. We hope that our revelatory results not only inspire scholarly contemplation but also elicit a chuckle or two at the sheer absurdity and wonder of our strangely interconnected world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The zany, unexpected correlation we've uncovered between Google queries about warts and the number of biological science teachers in Georgia has left us both delighted and slightly bewildered. This finding not only adds a new, slightly ridiculous dimension to the realms of research and statistical analysis but also confirms and expands on the groundbreaking work of Smith and Doe and Jones and Smith.

As we gallivant through the internet's virtual maze, it's clear that the digital footprints left behind by those on the quest for wart-related enlightenment have a curious influence on the career paths of aspiring biology educators. Our results align closely with Smith and Doe's earlier findings, affirming their thorough investigation and adding another layer of hilarity to the intriguing links between dermatological curiosity and academic pursuits. Furthermore, the implications of this discovery could potentially inspire a new wave of comedically motivated, skin-deep educational initiatives. There are undoubtedly ample opportunities for wry humor in integrating dermatology and biology in higher education, and it would be a shame to overlook the comedic potential of this correlation – after all, what's science without a little laughter?

In a parallel dimension, where the whimsical literature review comes to life, the resonance with Arthur Flora's "The Curious Case of the Botanical Biologist" and Stella Derm's "The Secret Life of Cells" becomes palpable. The unexpected turn of events in our own research bears a striking resemblance to the humorous yet thoughtful meanderings in these pieces of fiction, illustrating that truth can indeed be more entertaining than fiction, particularly when it comes to the whimsy of statistical exploration.

Our study's results not only shine a light on the improbable connection between seemingly unrelated queries and career choices but also remind us that statistical analysis is often akin to peeling back layers of a particularly perplexing onion. It's both an intellectual and whimsical pursuit, much like the improbable intersections and connections we've unearthed. Our findings add a touch of levity to the often serious business of scientific inquiry, reminding us that even in the most unexpected places—whether in the pursuit of answers to dermatological enigmas or the statistical intricacies of social phenomena—there is room for a bit of mirth and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'is this a wart' and The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the peculiar correlation between the volume of Google searches for "is this a wart" and the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia. Our team embarked on this whimsical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of dermatological curiosity and higher education. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings suggest a surprisingly strong connection between online concerns about skin blemishes and the population of biology educators in the peach state. We navigate through the data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ultimately shedding light on this curious relationship and prompting laughter, bewilderment, and perhaps the occasional "Eureka!" in the world of scientific inquiries.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow researchers, to a journey that will defy all expectations and leave you scratching your head in wonder (or perhaps just scratching). If you've ever found yourself pondering the confounding mystery of human behavior, or more specifically, the relationship between internet search queries and the academic pursuits of Georgia's biology enthusiasts, then you're in for a treat.
As scientists, we are accustomed to pursuing the most serious and weighty topics imaginable, tackling big questions with intellect, purpose, and the occasional lab explosion (we're looking at you, Dr. Bunsen). But today, we embark on a quest that is neither grand nor extraordinary in the traditional sense. The seemingly mundane and frivolous search term "is this a wart" has inexplicably crossed paths with the noble pursuit of biological education, creating a mash-up that is both perplexing and endlessly entertaining.
As we delve into this intersection of dermatological dilemmas and scholarly pursuits, rest assured that we will guide you through the mirthful maze of data analysis, statistical manipulations, and puns that only a true connoisseur of research can appreciate. So buckle up and prepare to experience a rollercoaster of emotions – from amusement to astonishment – as we unravel the threads of this unlikely connection between internet queries and the science guys of Georgia.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between Google searches for "is this a wart" and the number of university biological science teachers in Georgia from 2004 to 2022 have left us both surprised and tickled pink (or perhaps pinkish-red, if we're discussing dermatological matters). Our analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8690697, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. To put it plainly, the connection is so strong that even the most skeptical of statisticians would have to exclaim, "Well, I wart-an expected that!"
In addition to the impressive correlation coefficient, the r-squared value of 0.7552822 further cemented the strength of this peculiar association. This means that approximately 75.53% of the variability in the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia can be explained by changes in the volume of searches for "is this a wart." Who would have thought that skin-related uncertainties could hold such sway over the academic career choices of the peach state's biology educators? It appears that when it comes to the whims of internet searchers, one might say that biological science teachers have truly made their mark!
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables. In other words, the likelihood of this substantial correlation occurring by mere chance is so slim that one might describe it as more elusive than the search for a proverbial needle in a digital haystack. It seems that the fingerprints of dermatological inquiries are all over the employment landscape of biological science education, leaving us to marvel at the intricacies of this unexpected nexus.
To visually capture the essence of this astonishing correlation, we present in Fig. 1 a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong and positive relationship between Google searches for "is this a wart" and the number of university biological science teachers in Georgia. The clusters of data points dance across the graph like synchronized swimmers in an unexpected water ballet, proving that when it comes to statistical intrigue, truth is often stranger than fiction.
In conclusion, our findings have brought to light a connection that transcends the realms of both skin-deep inquiry and scholarly pursuit. We hope that our revelatory results not only inspire scholarly contemplation but also elicit a chuckle or two at the sheer absurdity and wonder of our strangely interconnected world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up this perplexing yet utterly delightful odyssey through the enigmatic realm of dermatological musings and educational pursuits, we find ourselves compelled to exclaim, "Well, I wart-an unexpected correlation!" Our findings have unveiled a connection so strong that it has reaffirmed our belief in the whimsical caprices of statistical fate. Who would have thought that a humble query about pesky skin anomalies could hold such sway over the employment landscape of Georgia's biology educators? It appears that the skin-deep mysteries of "is this a wart" have truly left their mark on the scholarly trajectory of science enthusiasts.

As we bid adieu to this uproarious escapade of statistical capers, we are reminded that truth is often stranger than fiction, and scientific inquiry knows no bounds - not even the peculiar paths paved by Google searches. Therefore, we assert with confidence that no further investigation is warranted in this area, as we have undoubtedly illuminated the unexpected nexus between dermal perplexities and scholarly vocations. Let this peculiar correlation stand as a testament to the peculiar and whimsical nature of scientific inquiry.

In the wise words of Albert Einstein (or was it "Weird Al" Yankovic?), "The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible." And indeed, the intertwining of "is this a wart" and university biology sharts stands as a testament to the absurd yet wondrous nature of the universe. With that, we bid farewell to this hilariously incongruous correlation, leaving the scientific community with the knowledge that, in the realm of research, truth is not only stranger than fiction but often funnier too.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Irreverent Scientific Discoveries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Quirky Research Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Google Queries and Science Guys: An Unlikely Link Between 'Is This a Wart' and University Biology Sharts with an abstract of In this paper, we dive into the peculiar correlation between the volume of Google searches for "is this a wart" and the employment statistics of biological science teachers in Georgia. Our team embarked on this whimsical journey to uncover the unexpected intersection of dermatological curiosity and higher education. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8690697 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings suggest a surprisingly strong connection between online concerns about skin blemishes and the population of biology educators in the peach state. We navigate through the data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ultimately shedding light on this curious relationship and prompting laughter, bewilderment, and perhaps the occasional "Eureka!" in the world of scientific inquiries.

ChatGPT:

Google search trends, dermatological curiosity, biological science teachers, Georgia, correlation coefficient, Google Trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'is this a wart'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'is this a wart' (United States, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'is this a wart'

The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of biological science teachers, postsecondary in Georgia
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia

Correlation r = 0.8690697 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7552822 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'is this a wart') over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-6. 0.0000013733841347103350000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.00014% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 728,128 random variables You don't actually need 728 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Google searches for 'is this a wart' (Rel. search volume)27.08335.757.833332.833339.166674.256.166678.755.166676.583337.833338.0833310.16677.9166798.083337.755.833339
The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia (Laborers)3460141013101030870900910830860820105011801030970740740850840870




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([27.0833,5.75,7.83333,2.83333,9.16667,4.25,6.16667,8.75,5.16667,6.58333,7.83333,8.08333,10.1667,7.91667,9,8.08333,7.75,5.83333,9,])
array_2 = np.array([3460,1410,1310,1030,870,900,910,830,860,820,1050,1180,1030,970,740,740,850,840,870,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'is this a wart'"
array_2_name = "The number of university biological science teachers in Georgia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 1084 · Black Variable ID: 1434 · Red Variable ID: 16980
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0