about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,078 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, there was a corresponding rise in patients experiencing unexpected emotional triggers. This led to higher levels of anxiety, particularly on the roads. The constant carpool therapy sessions meant more intense discussions and debates, causing an air bag explosion of emotions. The aides' efforts to help stabilize the mental state of Minnesotans inadvertently drove a surge in automotive recalls for air bag issues. It seems the state's approach to mental health care was really blowing up, creating a real air-ergency in the automotive industry. The situation just couldn't be defused, and it left everyone wondering, "What's the best way to calm these car-motions?"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A cybernetic art image ] Create a surreal landscape of a parking lot in Minnesota filled with a variety of cars, each with a different expression of sadness and anxiety on their windshields. The setting is bathed in a surreal, neon glow, with the cars appearing as if they are part of a futuristic, cybernetic world. The psychiatric aides, dressed in sleek, robotic suits, can be seen comforting the cars with gentle gestures. The mechanics, also adorned in cybernetic gear, are depicted working on the airbags while utilizing advanced futuristic tools. The entire scene should feel otherworldly and intriguing, with a touch of digital artistry and cybernetic elements to enhance the visual impact. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: The increase in psychiatric aides in Minnesota led to a rise in automotive recalls for airbag issues due to the psychological phenomenon known as "projection." As more psychiatric aides were hired, the cars in Minnesota started to anthropomorphize and develop their own cases of anxiety and depression. This led to a surge in airbag malfunctions as the cars projected their inner emotional turmoil onto their safety features, causing them to act out and deploy unexpectedly. It's a case of cars needing some serious therapy, and perhaps a little automotive acupuncture to relieve the tension. Clearly, the cars just need to learn to "think positive" and "take a breather" before they cause any more airbag-related mayhem on the roads.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cubism A black-and-white newspaper illustration Cybernetic art A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A cybernetic art image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. The increase in psychiatric aides in Minnesota led to a rise in automotive recalls for airbag issues due to the psychological phenomenon known as "projection." As more psychiatric aides were hired, the cars in Minnesota started to anthropomorphize and develop their own cases of anxiety and depression. This led to a surge in airbag malfunctions as the cars projected their inner emotional turmoil onto their safety features, causing them to act out and deploy unexpectedly. It's a case of cars needing some serious therapy, and perhaps a little automotive acupuncture to relieve the tension. Clearly, the cars just need to learn to "think positive" and "take a breather" before they cause any more airbag-related mayhem on the roads.
ChatGPT: Imagine a parking lot in Minnesota filled with cars. The cars have frowning faces drawn on their windshields with stick figures looking sad and anxious. Some cars are sighing heavily, and others are even seen shedding tiny paper tears. As the psychiatric aides walk through the parking lot, they pat the cars' hoods and whisper soothing words to them. In the background, mechanics are hurriedly working on airbags, trying to calm them down and teach them relaxation techniques. It's an unusual and comical sight to see cars being comforted and attended to as if they were people.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A cybernetic art image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a parking lot in Minnesota filled with cars. The cars have frowning faces drawn on their windshields with stick figures looking sad and anxious. Some cars are sighing heavily, and others are even seen shedding tiny paper tears. As the psychiatric aides walk through the parking lot, they pat the cars' hoods and whisper soothing words to them. In the background, mechanics are hurriedly working on airbags, trying to calm them down and teach them relaxation techniques. It's an unusual and comical sight to see cars being comforted and attended to as if they were people. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A cybernetic art image ] Create a surreal landscape of a parking lot in Minnesota filled with a variety of cars, each with a different expression of sadness and anxiety on their windshields. The setting is bathed in a surreal, neon glow, with the cars appearing as if they are part of a futuristic, cybernetic world. The psychiatric aides, dressed in sleek, robotic suits, can be seen comforting the cars with gentle gestures. The mechanics, also adorned in cybernetic gear, are depicted working on the airbags while utilizing advanced futuristic tools. The entire scene should feel otherworldly and intriguing, with a touch of digital artistry and cybernetic elements to enhance the visual impact.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls

The Journal of Unconventional Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to explore the surprising relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we delve into this peculiar correlation with an analytical approach that is as thorough as a psychoanalysis session. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, suggesting a strong association that cannot simply be dismissed as "baggage."

Through our statistical analysis, we uncovered compelling evidence that as the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, so did the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. This intriguing connection may leave one wondering, "Are air bag issues truly a matter of 'mental baggage'?"

In conclusion, our study sheds light on a curious relationship that may seem somewhat "up in the air" at first glance, but holds statistical significance worthy of further exploration. As automotive safety measures continue to evolve, it is imperative to not overlook the unexpected interactions that statistical analysis can unveil, even if they leave us pondering dad jokes about "baggage" and "mental air flows."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to explore the surprising relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we delve into this peculiar correlation with an analytical approach that is as thorough as a psychoanalysis session. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, suggesting a strong association that cannot simply be dismissed as "baggage."

Through our statistical analysis, we uncovered compelling evidence that as the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, so did the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. This intriguing connection may leave one wondering, "Are air bag issues truly a matter of 'mental baggage'?"

In conclusion, our study sheds light on a curious relationship that may seem somewhat "up in the air" at first glance, but holds statistical significance worthy of further exploration. As automotive safety measures continue to evolve, it is imperative to not overlook the unexpected interactions that statistical analysis can unveil, even if they leave us pondering dad jokes about "baggage" and "mental air flows."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The connection between seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across a multitude of disciplines. In this study, we delve into an unexpected correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. While the notion of psychiatric aides and air bag malfunctions may initially appear as dissimilar as apples and oranges, a statistical analysis reveals a correlation that is as clear as day, leading us to wonder: "What baggage could possibly be involved in the air bag issues?"

The correlation between psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls surfaces with a statistical coefficient that is as robust as the air bags themselves, raising eyebrows and prompting inquiries into the deeper implications at play. One might quip, "Are air bag issues the result of a case of 'deflated egos'?"

As we venture into this uncharted territory of statistical analysis, it becomes evident that the relationship between these two disparate entities holds significance that cannot be brushed aside. The statistical findings bear fruit that is as ripe as it is unexpected, compelling us to further unravel the intricacies of this connection.

With such unexpected discoveries at hand, we are compelled to acknowledge the possibility that statistical analysis can unearth the most surprising and humorous correlations, leaving us pondering the very essence of "baggage" and "air flows" in a mental, yet statistical sense. Through our research, we aim to contribute to the body of knowledge on statistical analysis and its implications in uncovering unexpected associations that may just leave you with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. After all, statistics may not always bring the answer, but they certainly lead to some "baggage" of laughs along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to explore the surprising relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we delve into this peculiar correlation with an analytical approach that is as thorough as a psychoanalysis session. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, suggesting a strong association that cannot simply be dismissed as "baggage."

Through our statistical analysis, we uncovered compelling evidence that as the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, so did the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. This intriguing connection may leave one wondering, "Are air bag issues truly a matter of 'mental baggage'?"

In conclusion, our study sheds light on a curious relationship that may seem somewhat "up in the air" at first glance, but holds statistical significance worthy of further exploration. As automotive safety measures continue to evolve, it is imperative to not overlook the unexpected interactions that statistical analysis can unveil, even if they leave us pondering dad jokes about "baggage" and "mental air flows."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connection between seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across a multitude of disciplines. In this study, we delve into an unexpected correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. While the notion of psychiatric aides and air bag malfunctions may initially appear as dissimilar as apples and oranges, a statistical analysis reveals a correlation that is as clear as day, leading us to wonder: "What baggage could possibly be involved in the air bag issues?"
The correlation between psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls surfaces with a statistical coefficient that is as robust as the air bags themselves, raising eyebrows and prompting inquiries into the deeper implications at play. One might quip, "Are air bag issues the result of a case of 'deflated egos'?"
As we venture into this uncharted territory of statistical analysis, it becomes evident that the relationship between these two disparate entities holds significance that cannot be brushed aside. The statistical findings bear fruit that is as ripe as it is unexpected, compelling us to further unravel the intricacies of this connection.
With such unexpected discoveries at hand, we are compelled to acknowledge the possibility that statistical analysis can unearth the most surprising and humorous correlations, leaving us pondering the very essence of "baggage" and "air flows" in a mental, yet statistical sense. Through our research, we aim to contribute to the body of knowledge on statistical analysis and its implications in uncovering unexpected associations that may just leave you with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. After all, statistics may not always bring the answer, but they certainly lead to some "baggage" of laughs along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags is a subject that has garnered increasingly more attention in recent years. In "Smith et al.," the authors delve into the statistical relationship between mental health care workers and automotive safety, uncovering a trend that is as unpredictable as it is intriguing. It is no wonder that such a correlation might lead one to ask, "What do you call a pile of cats near the airbag? A catastrophic fur deployment!"

Expanding on this unexpected correlation, "Doe and colleagues" present findings that suggest a positive association between the employment of psychiatric aides and the occurrence of automotive recalls related to air bag malfunction. The statistical significance of this relationship raises intriguing questions, not the least of which is, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including airbags!"

Turning to the work of "Jones," the authors draw attention to the potential impact of mental health care services on automotive safety measures, providing insights that are both compelling and as lighthearted as they are analytical. After all, who can resist a good dad joke when pondering the connection between "psychiatric aides" and "air bag recalls"?

In addition to these notable contributions, literature on the topic extends into unexpected realms. "Airbags and Mental 'Baggage' 101" explores the fictional accounts of air bag malfunctions within the context of psychological dilemmas, offering an imaginative perspective that is as entertaining as it is thought-provoking. Meanwhile, "The Tale of Deflated Egos" provides a fictional narrative that, while not based on empirical evidence, brings a humorous angle to the potential psychological aspects of air bag issues.

On a slightly more lighthearted note, there is dear old "SpongeBob SquarePants," who, although not directly addressing the topic at hand, never fails to offer a dose of laughter and whimsy to the research process. While not a scientific resource per se, the inimitable SpongeBob and his nautical escapades lend a touch of levity to the sometimes weighty subject matter of air bag recalls and psychiatric aides, reminding us that even in the world of statistics, there's always room for a good chuckle.

As we navigate the sea of academic literature and venture into the whimsical world of fictional accounts, one must not forget the guiding question of our research: "What do you call a group of musical air bags? An orchestra!" With this in mind, let us proceed to the empirical analysis and findings that shed light on the unexpected connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive air bag recalls, all the while keeping a lighthearted and humorous perspective on the statistical journey ahead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US DOT . You used data from 2003 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to explore the surprising relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we delve into this peculiar correlation with an analytical approach that is as thorough as a psychoanalysis session. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, suggesting a strong association that cannot simply be dismissed as "baggage."

Through our statistical analysis, we uncovered compelling evidence that as the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, so did the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. This intriguing connection may leave one wondering, "Are air bag issues truly a matter of 'mental baggage'?"

In conclusion, our study sheds light on a curious relationship that may seem somewhat "up in the air" at first glance, but holds statistical significance worthy of further exploration. As automotive safety measures continue to evolve, it is imperative to not overlook the unexpected interactions that statistical analysis can unveil, even if they leave us pondering dad jokes about "baggage" and "mental air flows."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connection between seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across a multitude of disciplines. In this study, we delve into an unexpected correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. While the notion of psychiatric aides and air bag malfunctions may initially appear as dissimilar as apples and oranges, a statistical analysis reveals a correlation that is as clear as day, leading us to wonder: "What baggage could possibly be involved in the air bag issues?"
The correlation between psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls surfaces with a statistical coefficient that is as robust as the air bags themselves, raising eyebrows and prompting inquiries into the deeper implications at play. One might quip, "Are air bag issues the result of a case of 'deflated egos'?"
As we venture into this uncharted territory of statistical analysis, it becomes evident that the relationship between these two disparate entities holds significance that cannot be brushed aside. The statistical findings bear fruit that is as ripe as it is unexpected, compelling us to further unravel the intricacies of this connection.
With such unexpected discoveries at hand, we are compelled to acknowledge the possibility that statistical analysis can unearth the most surprising and humorous correlations, leaving us pondering the very essence of "baggage" and "air flows" in a mental, yet statistical sense. Through our research, we aim to contribute to the body of knowledge on statistical analysis and its implications in uncovering unexpected associations that may just leave you with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. After all, statistics may not always bring the answer, but they certainly lead to some "baggage" of laughs along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for air bag issues, we employed a methodology as intricate and perplexing as solving a psychological puzzle. Our research team combed through a plethora of data sources, primarily drawing from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, in a quest to illuminate the statistical connection between these seemingly unconnected phenomena.

We commenced our study by utilizing a time-series analysis to examine the trends and patterns of psychiatric aide employment in Minnesota and automotive air bag recalls from 2003 to 2018. This in-depth analysis involved examining the frequency and severity of air bag recalls in connection with the fluctuations in the number of psychiatric aides, ensuring that we left no statistical stone unturned in our pursuit of insight. One might say we were diving headfirst into a statistical "bag of tricks."

Applying advanced statistical techniques such as multivariate regression modeling, we painstakingly controlled for potential confounding variables such as population density, vehicle usage patterns, and socioeconomic factors, ensuring that our findings were as robust and resilient as a well-designed air bag system. We left no statistical "airbag" unplumbed.

Furthermore, to validate the reliability and robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and cross-validated our models to ensure that the observed correlation was as sturdy as a flak jacket. Our methodology aimed to exonerate any doubts about the statistical significance of our findings, leaving no room for statistical "airheads" to challenge the integrity of our results.

In addition, we employed rigorous statistical tests to examine the strength and significance of the discovered correlation, namely employing inferential statistics and hypothesis testing to elucidate the magnitude of the association. This approach was as rigorous as securing a seat belt in a moving vehicle, ensuring that our statistical "air bags" were ready to deploy at any moment.

Rest assured, our methodology was as thorough as a mental health evaluation, leaving no statistical concept unexplored in our pursuit of understanding the curious relationship between psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls. Our approach aimed to analyze the data with precision, leaving no room for statistical "baggage" to cloud our results.

As we ventured into this statistical journey, we consciously embraced the unexpected, knowing that our methodology may just lead to statistical "bags" of unexpected correlations and revelations. Our methodology aspired to entertain and enlighten, ensuring that statistical analysis remained as invigorating and captivating as a classic dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US DOT .

For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8235648, r-squared of 0.6782590, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to explore the surprising relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we delve into this peculiar correlation with an analytical approach that is as thorough as a psychoanalysis session. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, suggesting a strong association that cannot simply be dismissed as "baggage."

Through our statistical analysis, we uncovered compelling evidence that as the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, so did the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. This intriguing connection may leave one wondering, "Are air bag issues truly a matter of 'mental baggage'?"

In conclusion, our study sheds light on a curious relationship that may seem somewhat "up in the air" at first glance, but holds statistical significance worthy of further exploration. As automotive safety measures continue to evolve, it is imperative to not overlook the unexpected interactions that statistical analysis can unveil, even if they leave us pondering dad jokes about "baggage" and "mental air flows."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The connection between seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across a multitude of disciplines. In this study, we delve into an unexpected correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. While the notion of psychiatric aides and air bag malfunctions may initially appear as dissimilar as apples and oranges, a statistical analysis reveals a correlation that is as clear as day, leading us to wonder: "What baggage could possibly be involved in the air bag issues?"
The correlation between psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls surfaces with a statistical coefficient that is as robust as the air bags themselves, raising eyebrows and prompting inquiries into the deeper implications at play. One might quip, "Are air bag issues the result of a case of 'deflated egos'?"
As we venture into this uncharted territory of statistical analysis, it becomes evident that the relationship between these two disparate entities holds significance that cannot be brushed aside. The statistical findings bear fruit that is as ripe as it is unexpected, compelling us to further unravel the intricacies of this connection.
With such unexpected discoveries at hand, we are compelled to acknowledge the possibility that statistical analysis can unearth the most surprising and humorous correlations, leaving us pondering the very essence of "baggage" and "air flows" in a mental, yet statistical sense. Through our research, we aim to contribute to the body of knowledge on statistical analysis and its implications in uncovering unexpected associations that may just leave you with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. After all, statistics may not always bring the answer, but they certainly lead to some "baggage" of laughs along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of this study unveil a noteworthy correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Over the 15-year period from 2003 to 2018, our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with an r-squared value of 0.6782590 and p < 0.01. This statistical evidence points to a substantial relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us to ponder whether there is indeed "baggage" involved in the automotive air bag issues.

Figure 1 illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the robust relationship between the number of psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls. The scatterplot exhibits a strong positive linear association, affirming the statistical measures of correlation coefficient and r-squared. One might say this correlation is as clear as the air in a perfectly deployed air bag – no "mental fog" here!

Our findings offer an intriguing perspective on the potential interplay between the mental health sector and automotive safety measures. The statistical significance of this correlation prompts us to delve into the deeper implications of this unexpected relationship, perhaps leading us to contemplate whether these "baggage handlers" are indeed responsible for the "airier" issues in automotive safety.

It is crucial to emphasize that while the correlation presented here is statistically significant, further research is warranted to comprehensively understand the mechanisms underlying this association. Nonetheless, our results undeniably call attention to the need for a more in-depth exploration of the humorous and unexpected correlations that statistical analysis can unravel, leaving us with a mental "baggage" full of statistical intrigue and automotive puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to explore the surprising relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we delve into this peculiar correlation with an analytical approach that is as thorough as a psychoanalysis session. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, suggesting a strong association that cannot simply be dismissed as "baggage."

Through our statistical analysis, we uncovered compelling evidence that as the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, so did the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. This intriguing connection may leave one wondering, "Are air bag issues truly a matter of 'mental baggage'?"

In conclusion, our study sheds light on a curious relationship that may seem somewhat "up in the air" at first glance, but holds statistical significance worthy of further exploration. As automotive safety measures continue to evolve, it is imperative to not overlook the unexpected interactions that statistical analysis can unveil, even if they leave us pondering dad jokes about "baggage" and "mental air flows."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags is a subject that has garnered increasingly more attention in recent years. In "Smith et al.," the authors delve into the statistical relationship between mental health care workers and automotive safety, uncovering a trend that is as unpredictable as it is intriguing. It is no wonder that such a correlation might lead one to ask, "What do you call a pile of cats near the airbag? A catastrophic fur deployment!"
Expanding on this unexpected correlation, "Doe and colleagues" present findings that suggest a positive association between the employment of psychiatric aides and the occurrence of automotive recalls related to air bag malfunction. The statistical significance of this relationship raises intriguing questions, not the least of which is, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including airbags!"
Turning to the work of "Jones," the authors draw attention to the potential impact of mental health care services on automotive safety measures, providing insights that are both compelling and as lighthearted as they are analytical. After all, who can resist a good dad joke when pondering the connection between "psychiatric aides" and "air bag recalls"?
In addition to these notable contributions, literature on the topic extends into unexpected realms. "Airbags and Mental 'Baggage' 101" explores the fictional accounts of air bag malfunctions within the context of psychological dilemmas, offering an imaginative perspective that is as entertaining as it is thought-provoking. Meanwhile, "The Tale of Deflated Egos" provides a fictional narrative that, while not based on empirical evidence, brings a humorous angle to the potential psychological aspects of air bag issues.
On a slightly more lighthearted note, there is dear old "SpongeBob SquarePants," who, although not directly addressing the topic at hand, never fails to offer a dose of laughter and whimsy to the research process. While not a scientific resource per se, the inimitable SpongeBob and his nautical escapades lend a touch of levity to the sometimes weighty subject matter of air bag recalls and psychiatric aides, reminding us that even in the world of statistics, there's always room for a good chuckle.
As we navigate the sea of academic literature and venture into the whimsical world of fictional accounts, one must not forget the guiding question of our research: "What do you call a group of musical air bags? An orchestra!" With this in mind, let us proceed to the empirical analysis and findings that shed light on the unexpected connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive air bag recalls, all the while keeping a lighthearted and humorous perspective on the statistical journey ahead.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of this study unveil a noteworthy correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Over the 15-year period from 2003 to 2018, our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with an r-squared value of 0.6782590 and p < 0.01. This statistical evidence points to a substantial relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us to ponder whether there is indeed "baggage" involved in the automotive air bag issues.
Figure 1 illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the robust relationship between the number of psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls. The scatterplot exhibits a strong positive linear association, affirming the statistical measures of correlation coefficient and r-squared. One might say this correlation is as clear as the air in a perfectly deployed air bag – no "mental fog" here!
Our findings offer an intriguing perspective on the potential interplay between the mental health sector and automotive safety measures. The statistical significance of this correlation prompts us to delve into the deeper implications of this unexpected relationship, perhaps leading us to contemplate whether these "baggage handlers" are indeed responsible for the "airier" issues in automotive safety.
It is crucial to emphasize that while the correlation presented here is statistically significant, further research is warranted to comprehensively understand the mechanisms underlying this association. Nonetheless, our results undeniably call attention to the need for a more in-depth exploration of the humorous and unexpected correlations that statistical analysis can unravel, leaving us with a mental "baggage" full of statistical intrigue and automotive puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study offer compelling evidence of a significant positive correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018 supports prior research that has hinted at the intriguing relationship between mental health care workers and automotive safety, prompting us to reconsider the phrase "baggage handlers" in a more literal sense. One might jest, "Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems about air bags!" Yet, our results remind us that beneath the surface of statistical analysis lies a correlation that begs for further investigation.

Our findings align with the work of Smith and colleagues, who first delved into the statistical relationship between mental health care workers and automotive safety, offering insights that we previously dismissed as mere puns. Similarly, the findings of Doe and colleagues, which suggested a positive association between the employment of psychiatric aides and the occurrence of automotive recalls related to air bag malfunctions, are supported by our empirical evidence. This correlation might prompt one to ponder whether air bag issues are truly a matter of "mental baggage," as our statistical analysis seems to imply.

On a more lighthearted note, our empirical support for the prior work also brings to mind the humorous anecdotes shared in "Airbags and Mental 'Baggage' 101" and "The Tale of Deflated Egos," which, despite their fictional nature, shine a comical yet intriguing light on the potential psychological aspects underlying air bag issues. In the realm of automotive statistics, it is refreshing to uncover correlations that are as substantial as they are unexpected, much like a good dad joke at a serious academic conference.

Figure 1, depicting a scatterplot showcasing the relationship between the number of psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls, reinforces the robust correlation revealed by our statistical analysis. This visualization provides a clear illustration of the strong positive linear association, affirming the significance of our findings. One might quip that this correlation is as tangible as the air in a well-inflated air bag – no "mental fog" to be found here!

While our study presents a statistically significant correlation, we acknowledge the need for further research to gain a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms governing this association. Our results call attention to the unexpected connections that statistical analysis can unveil, leaving us with a mental "baggage" full of statistical intrigue and automotive puns. Much like a good dad joke, the correlation between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive air bag recalls invites further exploration and a touch of lightheartedness in the statistical domain.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to explore the surprising relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we delve into this peculiar correlation with an analytical approach that is as thorough as a psychoanalysis session. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, suggesting a strong association that cannot simply be dismissed as "baggage."

Through our statistical analysis, we uncovered compelling evidence that as the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, so did the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. This intriguing connection may leave one wondering, "Are air bag issues truly a matter of 'mental baggage'?"

In conclusion, our study sheds light on a curious relationship that may seem somewhat "up in the air" at first glance, but holds statistical significance worthy of further exploration. As automotive safety measures continue to evolve, it is imperative to not overlook the unexpected interactions that statistical analysis can unveil, even if they leave us pondering dad jokes about "baggage" and "mental air flows."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The connection between seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across a multitude of disciplines. In this study, we delve into an unexpected correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. While the notion of psychiatric aides and air bag malfunctions may initially appear as dissimilar as apples and oranges, a statistical analysis reveals a correlation that is as clear as day, leading us to wonder: "What baggage could possibly be involved in the air bag issues?"
The correlation between psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls surfaces with a statistical coefficient that is as robust as the air bags themselves, raising eyebrows and prompting inquiries into the deeper implications at play. One might quip, "Are air bag issues the result of a case of 'deflated egos'?"
As we venture into this uncharted territory of statistical analysis, it becomes evident that the relationship between these two disparate entities holds significance that cannot be brushed aside. The statistical findings bear fruit that is as ripe as it is unexpected, compelling us to further unravel the intricacies of this connection.
With such unexpected discoveries at hand, we are compelled to acknowledge the possibility that statistical analysis can unearth the most surprising and humorous correlations, leaving us pondering the very essence of "baggage" and "air flows" in a mental, yet statistical sense. Through our research, we aim to contribute to the body of knowledge on statistical analysis and its implications in uncovering unexpected associations that may just leave you with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. After all, statistics may not always bring the answer, but they certainly lead to some "baggage" of laughs along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of this study unveil a noteworthy correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Over the 15-year period from 2003 to 2018, our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with an r-squared value of 0.6782590 and p < 0.01. This statistical evidence points to a substantial relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us to ponder whether there is indeed "baggage" involved in the automotive air bag issues.
Figure 1 illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the robust relationship between the number of psychiatric aides and automotive air bag recalls. The scatterplot exhibits a strong positive linear association, affirming the statistical measures of correlation coefficient and r-squared. One might say this correlation is as clear as the air in a perfectly deployed air bag – no "mental fog" here!
Our findings offer an intriguing perspective on the potential interplay between the mental health sector and automotive safety measures. The statistical significance of this correlation prompts us to delve into the deeper implications of this unexpected relationship, perhaps leading us to contemplate whether these "baggage handlers" are indeed responsible for the "airier" issues in automotive safety.
It is crucial to emphasize that while the correlation presented here is statistically significant, further research is warranted to comprehensively understand the mechanisms underlying this association. Nonetheless, our results undeniably call attention to the need for a more in-depth exploration of the humorous and unexpected correlations that statistical analysis can unravel, leaving us with a mental "baggage" full of statistical intrigue and automotive puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated an unexpected and "airily" amusing correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. The statistical evidence presented here leaves us pondering whether there is indeed "baggage" involved in the automotive air bag issues. Perhaps it's time for a therapist to conduct an "air bag" session to uncover the deeper "inflated" issues!

The robust positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with an r-squared value of 0.6782590 and p < 0.01 over the 15-year period from 2003 to 2018 undeniably points to a substantial relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. One might say this correlation is as clear as the air in a perfectly deployed air bag – no "mental fog" here! Being enigmatic as it is, the statistical significance of this association prompts us to delve into the deeper implications of this unexpected relationship.

As with any good joke, this correlation leaves us with a sense of wonder and a chuckle, but it is crucial to emphasize that further research is needed to comprehensively understand the mechanisms underlying this "baggage-airy" association. Nonetheless, our results undeniably call attention to the need for a more in-depth exploration of the humorous and unexpected correlations that statistical analysis can unravel. After all, statistics may not always bring the answer, but they certainly lead to some "baggage" of laughs along the way.

As such, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, unless, of course, one wishes to continue down the path of uncovering more "baggage" related to automotive puns and statistical intrigue!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Unconventional Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Foundation for Applied Behavioral Sciences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Baggage Handlers: The Airy Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Automotive Air Bag Recalls with an abstract of This study aims to explore the surprising relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we delve into this peculiar correlation with an analytical approach that is as thorough as a psychoanalysis session. Our findings reveal a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8235648 with p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018, suggesting a strong association that cannot simply be dismissed as "baggage."
Through our statistical analysis, we uncovered compelling evidence that as the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota increased, so did the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. This intriguing connection may leave one wondering, "Are air bag issues truly a matter of 'mental baggage'?"
In conclusion, our study sheds light on a curious relationship that may seem somewhat "up in the air" at first glance, but holds statistical significance worthy of further exploration. As automotive safety measures continue to evolve, it is imperative to not overlook the unexpected interactions that statistical analysis can unveil, even if they leave us pondering dad jokes about "baggage" and "mental air flows.

ChatGPT:

psychiatric aides, Minnesota, automotive recalls, air bags, correlation, statistical analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Transportation, air bag malfunctions, automotive safety measures

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of psychiatric aides in Minnesota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota

Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags

Correlation r = 0.8235648 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6782590 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota) over the 16 years from 2003 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.8E-5. 0.0000882761305214799300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.0088% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,328 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota (Psychiatric Aides)150150210140430380390190180190510480900840900430
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags (Recalls)101418121513111614233148691069991




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([150,150,210,140,430,380,390,190,180,190,510,480,900,840,900,430,])
array_2 = np.array([10,14,18,12,15,13,11,16,14,23,31,48,69,106,99,91,])
array_1_name = "The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1078 · Black Variable ID: 9982 · Red Variable ID: 1105
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0