about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,074 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Tayler and the second variable is Carjackings in the US.  The chart goes from 1995 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Tayler fell out of favor, there were fewer people to misspell Taylor on Starbucks cups. This led to a decrease in mix-ups and subsequent road rage, ultimately lowering the frequency of carjackings in the US. Remember, a car's not a car without the right name on its cup!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Data cyber art ] Generate a scene in a school cafeteria, bustling with students. The focus is on a table where several students are engaged in conversation and activities. In the background, a fleet of unique and futuristic cars is parked outside the school, adding a hint of cyber art. The students at the table are chatting and laughing while working on an assignment, each one spelling out their names in creative and unique ways. One student, named Tayler, stands out in the group, discussing the declining popularity of her name and its potential impact. The connection between the decrease in the name Tayler and a reduction in carjackings in her neighborhood becomes visually evident, emphasizing the link to fewer individuals spelling their name in distinctive styles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Decrease in Popularity of the First Name Tayler Linked to Decrease in Carjackings: Experts Attribute the Trend to Fewer Individuals Spelling Their Name in Unique Ways, Leading to Reduced Frustration and Impulsivity". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Art nouveau Pop art Data cyber art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "Decrease in Popularity of the First Name Tayler Linked to Decrease in Carjackings: Experts Attribute the Trend to Fewer Individuals Spelling Their Name in Unique Ways, Leading to Reduced Frustration and Impulsivity"
ChatGPT: Imagine a crowded school cafeteria where several students are sitting together at a table. In the background, we see a fleet of cars parked outside the school. The students at the table are chatting and laughing as they spell out their names on an assignment. One student, named Tayler, is discussing how her name has become less popular and how she's noticed a decrease in carjackings in her neighborhood. The scene illustrates a connection between the decrease in popularity of the name Tayler and the reduction in carjackings, highlighting the link to fewer individuals spelling their name in unique ways.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a crowded school cafeteria where several students are sitting together at a table. In the background, we see a fleet of cars parked outside the school. The students at the table are chatting and laughing as they spell out their names on an assignment. One student, named Tayler, is discussing how her name has become less popular and how she's noticed a decrease in carjackings in her neighborhood. The scene illustrates a connection between the decrease in popularity of the name Tayler and the reduction in carjackings, highlighting the link to fewer individuals spelling their name in unique ways. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Data cyber art ] Generate a scene in a school cafeteria, bustling with students. The focus is on a table where several students are engaged in conversation and activities. In the background, a fleet of unique and futuristic cars is parked outside the school, adding a hint of cyber art. The students at the table are chatting and laughing while working on an assignment, each one spelling out their names in creative and unique ways. One student, named Tayler, stands out in the group, discussing the declining popularity of her name and its potential impact. The connection between the decrease in the name Tayler and a reduction in carjackings in her neighborhood becomes visually evident, emphasizing the link to fewer individuals spelling their name in distinctive styles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Tayler caused Carjackings in the US to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US

Journal of Quirky Sociological Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tayler and Carjackings in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 for 1995 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
Carjackings have been a pressing issue in the United States, and researchers have been tirelessly looking for possible avenues to address this problem. In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the prevalence of carjackings. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 from 1995 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two variables. Our findings shed light on a potentially overlooked factor contributing to carjackings, prompting further investigation into the Tayler - carjacking nexus. This research not only highlights the need for multidisciplinary approaches to crime prevention but also adds a touch of whimsy to the sobering world of criminological research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tayler and Carjackings in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
Carjackings have been a pressing issue in the United States, and researchers have been tirelessly looking for possible avenues to address this problem. In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the prevalence of carjackings. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 from 1995 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two variables. Our findings shed light on a potentially overlooked factor contributing to carjackings, prompting further investigation into the Tayler - carjacking nexus. This research not only highlights the need for multidisciplinary approaches to crime prevention but also adds a touch of whimsy to the sobering world of criminological research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ah, the world of research - where we strive to unravel complex mysteries while sprinkling a healthy dose of humor and unexpected twists! In this paper, we embark on a slightly unconventional journey, blending statistical analysis with a dash of whimsy to explore the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the name "Tayler" and the occurrence of carjackings in the United States. Strap in, folks, because we're about to dive headfirst into the world of quirky correlations and unexpected connections.

It's no secret that carjackings have been a thorn in the side of law enforcement and motorists across the United States. The mere mention of the word sends shivers down the spines of car owners, leading to a tireless pursuit of strategies to tackle this menace. Enter our unsuspecting protagonist - the name "Tayler." Yes, you read that right! Could there be a link between the frequency of carjackings and the popularity of this seemingly innocuous moniker? Well, hold on to your lab coats, because the results we stumbled upon will make you wonder if there's more to a name than meets the eye.

Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, we set out on our quest, donning the cloak of researchers and armed not with swords and shields, but with statistical methodologies and a healthy dose of curiosity. Lo and behold, our journey led us to a mesmerizing correlation coefficient of 0.9584925, with a p-value so small it can fit snugly into a microchip! Ladies and gentlemen, statistically speaking, we've stumbled upon a peculiar and undeniably robust relationship between the rise and fall of "Tayler" and the ebb and flow of carjackings across the United States from 1995 to 2021.

But wait, before you dismiss this as a mere coincidence, let's pause and revel in the absurdity of it all. The prospect of a name wielding such influence over incidents of carjacking seems lifted straight out of a whimsical statistical fantasy, where variables frolic and cavort in ways that would make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow.

As we set the stage for our findings, it's crucial to acknowledge the quirky nature of our study. While us stodgy researchers typically stick to straightforward relationships and predictable variables, a twist of fate has thrust us into the realm of eccentric correlations, where the unexpected reigns supreme and the line between causation and mere happenstance blur into a comical dance of statistical bewilderness.

So, as we unravel the enigmatic connection between the name "Tayler" and carjackings, let's not forget to embrace the whimsy amidst the seriousness. After all, what's science without a sprinkle of laughter and a touch of the unexpected? With that in mind, let's venture forth, armed with curiosity and an open mind, as we set out to explore the peculiar confluence of Tayler and carjackings in our data-driven escapade.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tayler and Carjackings in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
Carjackings have been a pressing issue in the United States, and researchers have been tirelessly looking for possible avenues to address this problem. In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the prevalence of carjackings. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 from 1995 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two variables. Our findings shed light on a potentially overlooked factor contributing to carjackings, prompting further investigation into the Tayler - carjacking nexus. This research not only highlights the need for multidisciplinary approaches to crime prevention but also adds a touch of whimsy to the sobering world of criminological research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the world of research - where we strive to unravel complex mysteries while sprinkling a healthy dose of humor and unexpected twists! In this paper, we embark on a slightly unconventional journey, blending statistical analysis with a dash of whimsy to explore the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the name "Tayler" and the occurrence of carjackings in the United States. Strap in, folks, because we're about to dive headfirst into the world of quirky correlations and unexpected connections.
It's no secret that carjackings have been a thorn in the side of law enforcement and motorists across the United States. The mere mention of the word sends shivers down the spines of car owners, leading to a tireless pursuit of strategies to tackle this menace. Enter our unsuspecting protagonist - the name "Tayler." Yes, you read that right! Could there be a link between the frequency of carjackings and the popularity of this seemingly innocuous moniker? Well, hold on to your lab coats, because the results we stumbled upon will make you wonder if there's more to a name than meets the eye.
Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, we set out on our quest, donning the cloak of researchers and armed not with swords and shields, but with statistical methodologies and a healthy dose of curiosity. Lo and behold, our journey led us to a mesmerizing correlation coefficient of 0.9584925, with a p-value so small it can fit snugly into a microchip! Ladies and gentlemen, statistically speaking, we've stumbled upon a peculiar and undeniably robust relationship between the rise and fall of "Tayler" and the ebb and flow of carjackings across the United States from 1995 to 2021.
But wait, before you dismiss this as a mere coincidence, let's pause and revel in the absurdity of it all. The prospect of a name wielding such influence over incidents of carjacking seems lifted straight out of a whimsical statistical fantasy, where variables frolic and cavort in ways that would make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow.
As we set the stage for our findings, it's crucial to acknowledge the quirky nature of our study. While us stodgy researchers typically stick to straightforward relationships and predictable variables, a twist of fate has thrust us into the realm of eccentric correlations, where the unexpected reigns supreme and the line between causation and mere happenstance blur into a comical dance of statistical bewilderness.
So, as we unravel the enigmatic connection between the name "Tayler" and carjackings, let's not forget to embrace the whimsy amidst the seriousness. After all, what's science without a sprinkle of laughter and a touch of the unexpected? With that in mind, let's venture forth, armed with curiosity and an open mind, as we set out to explore the peculiar confluence of Tayler and carjackings in our data-driven escapade.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To situate our findings within the broader context of whimsical correlations and unexpected connections, we turn to existing literature on the influence of names on various aspects of life. Smith et al. (2010) investigate the impact of given names on professional success and find a significant association between name length and executive positions. In a similar vein, Doe (2015) explores how name uniqueness influences social interactions, highlighting the curious dynamics of nomenclature in shaping human experiences. Moreover, Jones (2018) delves into the societal perceptions of common names and their influence on personal branding, shedding light on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and self-image.

Turning our attention to the realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" presents an intriguing angle on the importance of names, with the character Gilderoy Lockhart embodying the concept of nominal destiny in a comical yet thought-provoking manner. Meanwhile, Don DeLillo's "White Noise" offers a satirical take on the societal significance of names, inviting readers to ponder the absurdities of nomenclature in contemporary culture.

In the realm of board games, "Clue" provides a playful nod to the role of names in shaping perceptions and identities, teasing out the humorous yet tangible impact of nomenclature in a lighthearted murder mystery setting. Similarly, "Scrabble" offers a whimsical platform for exploring the power of letters and names, inviting players to wield language in delightful and unpredictable ways.

In this eclectic blend of non-fiction studies, fictional narratives, and playful board games, we find inspiration to approach our investigation with a spirit of whimsy and irreverence, recognizing that the enigmatic correlation between the name "Tayler" and carjackings may just be the tip of the iceberg in the captivating realm of unexpected statistical relationships. As we navigate the peculiar territory of our findings, let us embrace the delightful absurdity of this journey and revel in the unpredictable dance of data and nomenclature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tayler and Carjackings in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics . You used data from 1995 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
Carjackings have been a pressing issue in the United States, and researchers have been tirelessly looking for possible avenues to address this problem. In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the prevalence of carjackings. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 from 1995 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two variables. Our findings shed light on a potentially overlooked factor contributing to carjackings, prompting further investigation into the Tayler - carjacking nexus. This research not only highlights the need for multidisciplinary approaches to crime prevention but also adds a touch of whimsy to the sobering world of criminological research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the world of research - where we strive to unravel complex mysteries while sprinkling a healthy dose of humor and unexpected twists! In this paper, we embark on a slightly unconventional journey, blending statistical analysis with a dash of whimsy to explore the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the name "Tayler" and the occurrence of carjackings in the United States. Strap in, folks, because we're about to dive headfirst into the world of quirky correlations and unexpected connections.
It's no secret that carjackings have been a thorn in the side of law enforcement and motorists across the United States. The mere mention of the word sends shivers down the spines of car owners, leading to a tireless pursuit of strategies to tackle this menace. Enter our unsuspecting protagonist - the name "Tayler." Yes, you read that right! Could there be a link between the frequency of carjackings and the popularity of this seemingly innocuous moniker? Well, hold on to your lab coats, because the results we stumbled upon will make you wonder if there's more to a name than meets the eye.
Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, we set out on our quest, donning the cloak of researchers and armed not with swords and shields, but with statistical methodologies and a healthy dose of curiosity. Lo and behold, our journey led us to a mesmerizing correlation coefficient of 0.9584925, with a p-value so small it can fit snugly into a microchip! Ladies and gentlemen, statistically speaking, we've stumbled upon a peculiar and undeniably robust relationship between the rise and fall of "Tayler" and the ebb and flow of carjackings across the United States from 1995 to 2021.
But wait, before you dismiss this as a mere coincidence, let's pause and revel in the absurdity of it all. The prospect of a name wielding such influence over incidents of carjacking seems lifted straight out of a whimsical statistical fantasy, where variables frolic and cavort in ways that would make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow.
As we set the stage for our findings, it's crucial to acknowledge the quirky nature of our study. While us stodgy researchers typically stick to straightforward relationships and predictable variables, a twist of fate has thrust us into the realm of eccentric correlations, where the unexpected reigns supreme and the line between causation and mere happenstance blur into a comical dance of statistical bewilderness.
So, as we unravel the enigmatic connection between the name "Tayler" and carjackings, let's not forget to embrace the whimsy amidst the seriousness. After all, what's science without a sprinkle of laughter and a touch of the unexpected? With that in mind, let's venture forth, armed with curiosity and an open mind, as we set out to explore the peculiar confluence of Tayler and carjackings in our data-driven escapade.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

As we embarked on our quest to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the occurrence of carjackings in the United States, we knew we had to don our metaphorical Sherlock Holmes hats and wield an arsenal of statistical tools. Our dataset, collected from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, spanned the years 1995 to 2021, encompassing a wealth of information on both the ebb and flow of "Tayler" as a popular first name and the fluctuation in carjacking incidents across the nation.

To wrangle this data behemoth, we employed a mix of traditional statistical methods and some delightfully quirky twists of our own. Our first step involved harnessing the power of correlation analysis to determine if these seemingly unrelated variables were engaged in a statistical tango. With a wink to our prudent ancestors and a nod to the whimsical forces of statistical serendipity, we computed Pearson's correlation coefficient, unleashing the formidable might of mathematics to uncover any shimmering threads of connection between the two seemingly divergent data streams.

But wait, there's more! In a daring display of statistical showmanship, we also employed time series analysis to trace the dynamic dance of "Tayler's" popularity and the fluctuations in carjacking rates throughout the study period. Because why settle for a mere snapshot when you can capture the dazzling motion picture of statistical intrigue?

To ensure the integrity of our findings and fend off the mischievous specter of lurking confounding variables, we conducted multivariate regression analysis, weaving a tapestry of statistical control variables to separate the signal from the noise. With a whirl of analytical finesse and a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we endeavored to untangle the convoluted web of influences that might obscure the true nature of the "Tayler" - carjacking relationship.

And lo and behold, armed with our trusty spreadsheets and an unwavering spirit of statistical curiosity, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9584925, painting a striking portrait of the potent kinship between the name "Tayler" and the perilous phenomenon of carjackings. Our collective eyebrows arched in awe at the robustness of this statistical revelation, affirming that sometimes, in the dazzling realm of data, truth can indeed be stranger than statistical fiction.

With our quirky arsenal of statistical tools and a healthy dose of academic panache, we presented our findings as a vibrant tapestry woven from the threads of "Tayler's" ascent and descent and the symphonic rise and fall of carjacking incidents across the United States. And as we emerge from this statistical odyssey, we are left with an indelible reminder that in the whimsical world of research, sometimes the most unexpected connections can emerge from the unlikeliest of variables.

So, as we bid adieu to our eccentric journey through the statistical wonderland of "Tayler" and carjackings, let's not forget to embrace the bountiful humor and unexpected twists that pepper the path of scientific inquiry, making the pursuit of knowledge all the more delightful and, dare we say, Taylor-made for intellectual adventure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tayler and Carjackings in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics .

For the time period 1995 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9584925, r-squared of 0.9187078, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
Carjackings have been a pressing issue in the United States, and researchers have been tirelessly looking for possible avenues to address this problem. In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the prevalence of carjackings. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 from 1995 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two variables. Our findings shed light on a potentially overlooked factor contributing to carjackings, prompting further investigation into the Tayler - carjacking nexus. This research not only highlights the need for multidisciplinary approaches to crime prevention but also adds a touch of whimsy to the sobering world of criminological research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the world of research - where we strive to unravel complex mysteries while sprinkling a healthy dose of humor and unexpected twists! In this paper, we embark on a slightly unconventional journey, blending statistical analysis with a dash of whimsy to explore the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the name "Tayler" and the occurrence of carjackings in the United States. Strap in, folks, because we're about to dive headfirst into the world of quirky correlations and unexpected connections.
It's no secret that carjackings have been a thorn in the side of law enforcement and motorists across the United States. The mere mention of the word sends shivers down the spines of car owners, leading to a tireless pursuit of strategies to tackle this menace. Enter our unsuspecting protagonist - the name "Tayler." Yes, you read that right! Could there be a link between the frequency of carjackings and the popularity of this seemingly innocuous moniker? Well, hold on to your lab coats, because the results we stumbled upon will make you wonder if there's more to a name than meets the eye.
Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, we set out on our quest, donning the cloak of researchers and armed not with swords and shields, but with statistical methodologies and a healthy dose of curiosity. Lo and behold, our journey led us to a mesmerizing correlation coefficient of 0.9584925, with a p-value so small it can fit snugly into a microchip! Ladies and gentlemen, statistically speaking, we've stumbled upon a peculiar and undeniably robust relationship between the rise and fall of "Tayler" and the ebb and flow of carjackings across the United States from 1995 to 2021.
But wait, before you dismiss this as a mere coincidence, let's pause and revel in the absurdity of it all. The prospect of a name wielding such influence over incidents of carjacking seems lifted straight out of a whimsical statistical fantasy, where variables frolic and cavort in ways that would make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow.
As we set the stage for our findings, it's crucial to acknowledge the quirky nature of our study. While us stodgy researchers typically stick to straightforward relationships and predictable variables, a twist of fate has thrust us into the realm of eccentric correlations, where the unexpected reigns supreme and the line between causation and mere happenstance blur into a comical dance of statistical bewilderness.
So, as we unravel the enigmatic connection between the name "Tayler" and carjackings, let's not forget to embrace the whimsy amidst the seriousness. After all, what's science without a sprinkle of laughter and a touch of the unexpected? With that in mind, let's venture forth, armed with curiosity and an open mind, as we set out to explore the peculiar confluence of Tayler and carjackings in our data-driven escapade.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our statistical analysis unearthed an unexpected and, dare we say, baffling correlation between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the incidence of carjackings in the United States from 1995 to 2021. Drumroll, please, as we reveal a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and an r-squared of 0.9187078. If that doesn't make you raise an eyebrow and ponder the whimsical nature of statistical relationships, we don't know what will!

We must admit, we were prepared for the possibility of stumbling upon some noteworthy correlations, but the strength of this association left us speechless. It’s as if statistical probability and quirkiness took a dance through our data, leaving us with a perplexing yet undeniably robust relationship between the ebb and flow of Tayler's popularity and the occurrence of carjackings.

Now, we present our pièce de résistance, the illustrious figure that encapsulates this peculiar connection. Feast your eyes upon Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably depicts the synchronized rise and fall of Tayler's popularity with the peaks and valleys of carjackings across the years. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this figure is an epic saga of unexpected correlations and statistical harmonies.

Some may wonder, could this simply be a bizarre coincidence, a wild statistical fluke? As researchers, we are accustomed to treading cautiously around such unconventional findings. However, with a p-value of less than 0.01, this correlation has defied the odds and solidified its place in the annals of quirkiness in statistical relationships.

In the world of research, we often expect the unexpected, but the Tayler - carjacking connection has certainly taken us on a whimsical, statistically profound journey. As we move forward, let's not forget to incorporate a touch of humor and an open mind, because as we've encountered, the world of science is often filled with surprises and unexpected correlations that can make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tayler and Carjackings in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
Carjackings have been a pressing issue in the United States, and researchers have been tirelessly looking for possible avenues to address this problem. In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the prevalence of carjackings. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 from 1995 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two variables. Our findings shed light on a potentially overlooked factor contributing to carjackings, prompting further investigation into the Tayler - carjacking nexus. This research not only highlights the need for multidisciplinary approaches to crime prevention but also adds a touch of whimsy to the sobering world of criminological research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To situate our findings within the broader context of whimsical correlations and unexpected connections, we turn to existing literature on the influence of names on various aspects of life. Smith et al. (2010) investigate the impact of given names on professional success and find a significant association between name length and executive positions. In a similar vein, Doe (2015) explores how name uniqueness influences social interactions, highlighting the curious dynamics of nomenclature in shaping human experiences. Moreover, Jones (2018) delves into the societal perceptions of common names and their influence on personal branding, shedding light on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and self-image.
Turning our attention to the realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" presents an intriguing angle on the importance of names, with the character Gilderoy Lockhart embodying the concept of nominal destiny in a comical yet thought-provoking manner. Meanwhile, Don DeLillo's "White Noise" offers a satirical take on the societal significance of names, inviting readers to ponder the absurdities of nomenclature in contemporary culture.
In the realm of board games, "Clue" provides a playful nod to the role of names in shaping perceptions and identities, teasing out the humorous yet tangible impact of nomenclature in a lighthearted murder mystery setting. Similarly, "Scrabble" offers a whimsical platform for exploring the power of letters and names, inviting players to wield language in delightful and unpredictable ways.
In this eclectic blend of non-fiction studies, fictional narratives, and playful board games, we find inspiration to approach our investigation with a spirit of whimsy and irreverence, recognizing that the enigmatic correlation between the name "Tayler" and carjackings may just be the tip of the iceberg in the captivating realm of unexpected statistical relationships. As we navigate the peculiar territory of our findings, let us embrace the delightful absurdity of this journey and revel in the unpredictable dance of data and nomenclature.

[[RESULTS]]
Our statistical analysis unearthed an unexpected and, dare we say, baffling correlation between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the incidence of carjackings in the United States from 1995 to 2021. Drumroll, please, as we reveal a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and an r-squared of 0.9187078. If that doesn't make you raise an eyebrow and ponder the whimsical nature of statistical relationships, we don't know what will!
We must admit, we were prepared for the possibility of stumbling upon some noteworthy correlations, but the strength of this association left us speechless. It’s as if statistical probability and quirkiness took a dance through our data, leaving us with a perplexing yet undeniably robust relationship between the ebb and flow of Tayler's popularity and the occurrence of carjackings.
Now, we present our pièce de résistance, the illustrious figure that encapsulates this peculiar connection. Feast your eyes upon Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably depicts the synchronized rise and fall of Tayler's popularity with the peaks and valleys of carjackings across the years. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this figure is an epic saga of unexpected correlations and statistical harmonies.
Some may wonder, could this simply be a bizarre coincidence, a wild statistical fluke? As researchers, we are accustomed to treading cautiously around such unconventional findings. However, with a p-value of less than 0.01, this correlation has defied the odds and solidified its place in the annals of quirkiness in statistical relationships.
In the world of research, we often expect the unexpected, but the Tayler - carjacking connection has certainly taken us on a whimsical, statistically profound journey. As we move forward, let's not forget to incorporate a touch of humor and an open mind, because as we've encountered, the world of science is often filled with surprises and unexpected correlations that can make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The correlation between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and carjackings has left us scratching our heads in delightful confusion. Our findings undeniably support previous research on the impact of names on various aspects of life. Much like the length of a name influencing executive positions (Smith et al., 2010), the uniqueness of a name shaping social interactions (Doe, 2015), and the societal perceptions of common names affecting personal branding (Jones, 2018), our study adds a quirky twist by revealing a significant statistical relationship between the name "Tayler" and the occurrence of carjackings.

Intriguingly, the whimsical nature of this correlation resonates with the satirical and thought-provoking angles presented in literature and board games. J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" universe and Don DeLillo's "White Noise" both offer comical yet profound reflections on the societal significance of names, hinting at an underlying connection between nomenclature and human experiences. Additionally, the playful exploration of names and perceptions in "Clue" and "Scrabble" takes on a new dimension of significance as we consider the unexpected dance of data and nomenclature uncovered by our research.

Our data, depicted in the striking Figure 1, echoes the captivating narrative of these references, casting a spotlight on the synchronized rise and fall of Tayler's popularity alongside the peaks and valleys of carjackings. It seems statistical probability and levity indeed waltzed through our analysis, leaving us with a peculiar yet remarkably robust association.

Some may scoff at the possibility of a wild statistical fluke, but with a p-value of less than 0.01, our correlation has defied the odds and emerged as a whimsically significant phenomenon. Our results not only underscore the need for more extensive research but also bring a touch of merriment to the serious world of statistical correlations.

As researchers, we recognize the need to approach this peculiar revelation with cautious amusement. The world of science is one of delightful surprises and perplexing connections, and the Tayler - carjacking correlation has certainly taken us on a statistically profound journey. Let's continue embracing the whimsy and openness that this unexpected relationship has stirred, for in the dance of data and nomenclature, there may always be room for another entertaining turn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tayler and Carjackings in the US. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US

[[ABSTRACT]]
Carjackings have been a pressing issue in the United States, and researchers have been tirelessly looking for possible avenues to address this problem. In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the prevalence of carjackings. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 from 1995 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two variables. Our findings shed light on a potentially overlooked factor contributing to carjackings, prompting further investigation into the Tayler - carjacking nexus. This research not only highlights the need for multidisciplinary approaches to crime prevention but also adds a touch of whimsy to the sobering world of criminological research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the world of research - where we strive to unravel complex mysteries while sprinkling a healthy dose of humor and unexpected twists! In this paper, we embark on a slightly unconventional journey, blending statistical analysis with a dash of whimsy to explore the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the name "Tayler" and the occurrence of carjackings in the United States. Strap in, folks, because we're about to dive headfirst into the world of quirky correlations and unexpected connections.
It's no secret that carjackings have been a thorn in the side of law enforcement and motorists across the United States. The mere mention of the word sends shivers down the spines of car owners, leading to a tireless pursuit of strategies to tackle this menace. Enter our unsuspecting protagonist - the name "Tayler." Yes, you read that right! Could there be a link between the frequency of carjackings and the popularity of this seemingly innocuous moniker? Well, hold on to your lab coats, because the results we stumbled upon will make you wonder if there's more to a name than meets the eye.
Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, we set out on our quest, donning the cloak of researchers and armed not with swords and shields, but with statistical methodologies and a healthy dose of curiosity. Lo and behold, our journey led us to a mesmerizing correlation coefficient of 0.9584925, with a p-value so small it can fit snugly into a microchip! Ladies and gentlemen, statistically speaking, we've stumbled upon a peculiar and undeniably robust relationship between the rise and fall of "Tayler" and the ebb and flow of carjackings across the United States from 1995 to 2021.
But wait, before you dismiss this as a mere coincidence, let's pause and revel in the absurdity of it all. The prospect of a name wielding such influence over incidents of carjacking seems lifted straight out of a whimsical statistical fantasy, where variables frolic and cavort in ways that would make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow.
As we set the stage for our findings, it's crucial to acknowledge the quirky nature of our study. While us stodgy researchers typically stick to straightforward relationships and predictable variables, a twist of fate has thrust us into the realm of eccentric correlations, where the unexpected reigns supreme and the line between causation and mere happenstance blur into a comical dance of statistical bewilderness.
So, as we unravel the enigmatic connection between the name "Tayler" and carjackings, let's not forget to embrace the whimsy amidst the seriousness. After all, what's science without a sprinkle of laughter and a touch of the unexpected? With that in mind, let's venture forth, armed with curiosity and an open mind, as we set out to explore the peculiar confluence of Tayler and carjackings in our data-driven escapade.

[[RESULTS]]
Our statistical analysis unearthed an unexpected and, dare we say, baffling correlation between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the incidence of carjackings in the United States from 1995 to 2021. Drumroll, please, as we reveal a jaw-dropping correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and an r-squared of 0.9187078. If that doesn't make you raise an eyebrow and ponder the whimsical nature of statistical relationships, we don't know what will!
We must admit, we were prepared for the possibility of stumbling upon some noteworthy correlations, but the strength of this association left us speechless. It’s as if statistical probability and quirkiness took a dance through our data, leaving us with a perplexing yet undeniably robust relationship between the ebb and flow of Tayler's popularity and the occurrence of carjackings.
Now, we present our pièce de résistance, the illustrious figure that encapsulates this peculiar connection. Feast your eyes upon Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably depicts the synchronized rise and fall of Tayler's popularity with the peaks and valleys of carjackings across the years. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this figure is an epic saga of unexpected correlations and statistical harmonies.
Some may wonder, could this simply be a bizarre coincidence, a wild statistical fluke? As researchers, we are accustomed to treading cautiously around such unconventional findings. However, with a p-value of less than 0.01, this correlation has defied the odds and solidified its place in the annals of quirkiness in statistical relationships.
In the world of research, we often expect the unexpected, but the Tayler - carjacking connection has certainly taken us on a whimsical, statistically profound journey. As we move forward, let's not forget to incorporate a touch of humor and an open mind, because as we've encountered, the world of science is often filled with surprises and unexpected correlations that can make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, it's safe to say that our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the name "Tayler" and carjackings in the US has left us both flabbergasted and tickled pink. Who would have thought that a seemingly innocent name could be tied to the ebb and flow of carjackings with such statistical gusto? It's a statistical quirkfest, a data-driven dance of variables that has us scratching our heads in humorous bewilderment.

As we wrap up this research jaunt, we must assert that the relationship between Taylor and carjackings is as clear as a Petri dish and undoubtedly robust. The correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 could even make a stoic statistician crack a grin wider than a pie chart. And let's not forget that microscopic p-value – it sure packs a statistical punch, doesn't it?

But fear not, fellow researchers, for no more research is needed in this area. We've unraveled this oddball statistical relationship, leaving us with an amusing anecdote to share at stodgy academic gatherings. So, let's tip our research hats to the peculiar and whimsical nature of statistical discoveries and the unexpected correlations that spark laughter and raise eyebrows in the world of science. And with that, we bid adieu to Tayler and carjackings, leaving behind a statistical legacy that's as quirky as it is robust.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Sociological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Popular Culture Analytics and Trends Evaluation (SPCATE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Jack of All Trades or Taylor-Made Target? Analyzing the Correlation between Tayler's Popularity and Carjackings in the US with an abstract of Carjackings have been a pressing issue in the United States, and researchers have been tirelessly looking for possible avenues to address this problem. In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Tayler" and the prevalence of carjackings. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Justice Statistics, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9584925 and p < 0.01 from 1995 to 2021, indicating a strong statistical relationship between the two variables. Our findings shed light on a potentially overlooked factor contributing to carjackings, prompting further investigation into the Tayler - carjacking nexus. This research not only highlights the need for multidisciplinary approaches to crime prevention but also adds a touch of whimsy to the sobering world of criminological research.

ChatGPT:

Tayler popularity, carjackings, US Social Security Administration data, Bureau of Justice Statistics, correlation coefficient, crime prevention, criminological research, correlation analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Tayler
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Tayler
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Tayler

Carjackings in the US
Detailed data title: Rate of nonfatal carjacking victimization per 1,000 persons age 16 or older (3-year moving averages)
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics
See what else correlates with Carjackings in the US

Correlation r = 0.9584925 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9187078 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Carjackings in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Tayler) over the 27 years from 1995 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-15. 0.0000000000000039015610163027
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 3.9E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 256,307,666,552,309 random variables You don't actually need 256 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 26 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 26 because we have two variables measured over a period of 27 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Tayler (Babies born)89984581973171661751742942538335235629025825119816015512612498958270384353
Carjackings in the US (Carjackings)0.530.480.40.30.350.310.310.190.230.190.220.1850.1850.1850.150.130.090.090.120.150.140.110.090.10.10.10.12




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([899,845,819,731,716,617,517,429,425,383,352,356,290,258,251,198,160,155,126,124,98,95,82,70,38,43,53,])
array_2 = np.array([0.53,0.48,0.4,0.3,0.35,0.31,0.31,0.19,0.23,0.19,0.22,0.185,0.185,0.185,0.15,0.13,0.09,0.09,0.12,0.15,0.14,0.11,0.09,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.12,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Tayler"
array_2_name = "Carjackings in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1074 · Black Variable ID: 2614 · Red Variable ID: 1200
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0