about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,072 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'how to annex texas' and the second variable is Broadcom's stock price (AVGO).  The chart goes from 2010 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As interest in annexing Texas grew, people realized the potential for a state-sized backyard and demand for fencing and landscaping materials skyrocketed. Broadcom, with its secret subsidiary 'BroadLawn', saw an unexpected surge in orders for high-tech security systems and automated lawnmower chips, leading to a bump in their stock price. It seems everyone wanted a byte of the Lone Star state!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' and depicting this scene: The bustling office from a galaxy far, far away is depicted, with employees excitedly preparing for a big project. In one corner, there are aliens practicing their lassoing skills and intergalactic beings wearing cowboy boots, brainstorming around a holographic map of a distant planetary system. Meanwhile, a giant digital screen displays the statistics of universal searches, with the number of "how to conquer new worlds" searches steadily increasing. This scene is accompanied by a palpable buzz in the air as the employees work feverishly on a top-secret project, the details of which are teased in hushed conversations and speculative whispers. Outside the office, the astral stock ticker prominently displays the trade value of dilithium crystals rising steadily, mirroring the growing anticipation and excitement within the company. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: An increase in "how to annex Texas" Google searches caused Broadcom's stock price to increase because the tech company was secretly working on a top-secret project to annex Texas and turn it into a giant data center. As more and more people turned to Google for their lawless land grab research, Broadcom's stock price skyrocketed as investors caught wind of the company's grand plan to take over the Lone Star State. The surge in Google searches also coincided with a wave of Texan-themed team-building exercises at Broadcom's headquarters, as employees practiced their cowboy skills and learned to lasso data like never before. As the search for Texas annexation tips heated up, so did the anticipation for Broadcom's big reveal, and the stock price reflected the excitement of investors envisioning a future filled with silicon cowboys and digital tumbleweeds.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cyber folk Macabre An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. An increase in "how to annex Texas" Google searches caused Broadcom's stock price to increase because the tech company was secretly working on a top-secret project to annex Texas and turn it into a giant data center. As more and more people turned to Google for their lawless land grab research, Broadcom's stock price skyrocketed as investors caught wind of the company's grand plan to take over the Lone Star State. The surge in Google searches also coincided with a wave of Texan-themed team-building exercises at Broadcom's headquarters, as employees practiced their cowboy skills and learned to lasso data like never before. As the search for Texas annexation tips heated up, so did the anticipation for Broadcom's big reveal, and the stock price reflected the excitement of investors envisioning a future filled with silicon cowboys and digital tumbleweeds.
ChatGPT: Imagine a bustling office with employees excitedly preparing for a big project. In one corner, there are people practicing lassoing skills and cowboy boot-wearing individuals brainstorming around a map of Texas. Meanwhile, a giant digital screen displays Google's search statistics, with the number of "how to annex Texas" searches steadily increasing. This scene is accompanied by a palpable buzz in the air as the employees work feverishly on a top-secret project, the details of which are teased in hushed conversations and speculative whispers. Outside the office, the stock ticker prominently displays Broadcom's stock price rising steadily, mirroring the growing anticipation and excitement within the company.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a bustling office with employees excitedly preparing for a big project. In one corner, there are people practicing lassoing skills and cowboy boot-wearing individuals brainstorming around a map of Texas. Meanwhile, a giant digital screen displays Google's search statistics, with the number of "how to annex Texas" searches steadily increasing. This scene is accompanied by a palpable buzz in the air as the employees work feverishly on a top-secret project, the details of which are teased in hushed conversations and speculative whispers. Outside the office, the stock ticker prominently displays Broadcom's stock price rising steadily, mirroring the growing anticipation and excitement within the company. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' and depicting this scene: The bustling office from a galaxy far, far away is depicted, with employees excitedly preparing for a big project. In one corner, there are aliens practicing their lassoing skills and intergalactic beings wearing cowboy boots, brainstorming around a holographic map of a distant planetary system. Meanwhile, a giant digital screen displays the statistics of universal searches, with the number of "how to conquer new worlds" searches steadily increasing. This scene is accompanied by a palpable buzz in the air as the employees work feverishly on a top-secret project, the details of which are teased in hushed conversations and speculative whispers. Outside the office, the astral stock ticker prominently displays the trade value of dilithium crystals rising steadily, mirroring the growing anticipation and excitement within the company.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in how to annex texas (Google searches for 'how to annex texas') caused Broadcom's stock price (AVGO) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock

The Journal of Digital Geopolitics and Economic Frictions

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to annex texas' and Broadcom's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuation of Broadcom's stock price. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team delved into this unlikely pairing with unrelenting curiosity.

Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, we uncovered a striking interdependence. It seems that the online quests regarding Texas annexation may indeed hold the reins in steering Broadcom's stock price, providing a novel avenue for market analysis.

Perhaps those Google searches are secretly influencing the economy - it's like they're annexing their own little piece of stock market influence!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to annex texas' and Broadcom's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuation of Broadcom's stock price. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team delved into this unlikely pairing with unrelenting curiosity.

Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, we uncovered a striking interdependence. It seems that the online quests regarding Texas annexation may indeed hold the reins in steering Broadcom's stock price, providing a novel avenue for market analysis.

Perhaps those Google searches are secretly influencing the economy - it's like they're annexing their own little piece of stock market influence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining of politics and economics has long been a subject of interest for researchers and analysts alike. It is not often, however, that one comes across a correlation as unexpected and captivating as the one we have uncovered in our study. The peculiar relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuations of Broadcom's stock price has led us down a rabbit hole of inquiry and speculation. It's like the stock market and online search trends decided to square dance together!

As students of data and devotees of statistical inquiry, we were compelled to explore this enigmatic link further, and our findings have left us both astounded and amused. The idea that a seemingly niche and speculative topic like Texas annexation could have any bearing on the movements of a global corporation's stock price is certainly thought-provoking. It's as if the Lone Star State is putting the 'stock' in "stockyards"!

The implications of this intertwined relationship, should they prove consistent and reliable, could offer a novel perspective on the influence of public sentiment and mass opinion on market behavior. It's as if the market is saying, "Don't mess with Texas - unless you want your stock to take a tumble!"

In this paper, we delve into the methods and results of our investigation, presenting the evidence for this curious connection and considering the potential implications for both market analysis and the understanding of online search behavior. It's like peeling back the layers of a particularly unexpected onion!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to annex texas' and Broadcom's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuation of Broadcom's stock price. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team delved into this unlikely pairing with unrelenting curiosity.

Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, we uncovered a striking interdependence. It seems that the online quests regarding Texas annexation may indeed hold the reins in steering Broadcom's stock price, providing a novel avenue for market analysis.

Perhaps those Google searches are secretly influencing the economy - it's like they're annexing their own little piece of stock market influence!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of politics and economics has long been a subject of interest for researchers and analysts alike. It is not often, however, that one comes across a correlation as unexpected and captivating as the one we have uncovered in our study. The peculiar relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuations of Broadcom's stock price has led us down a rabbit hole of inquiry and speculation. It's like the stock market and online search trends decided to square dance together!
As students of data and devotees of statistical inquiry, we were compelled to explore this enigmatic link further, and our findings have left us both astounded and amused. The idea that a seemingly niche and speculative topic like Texas annexation could have any bearing on the movements of a global corporation's stock price is certainly thought-provoking. It's as if the Lone Star State is putting the 'stock' in "stockyards"!
The implications of this intertwined relationship, should they prove consistent and reliable, could offer a novel perspective on the influence of public sentiment and mass opinion on market behavior. It's as if the market is saying, "Don't mess with Texas - unless you want your stock to take a tumble!"
In this paper, we delve into the methods and results of our investigation, presenting the evidence for this curious connection and considering the potential implications for both market analysis and the understanding of online search behavior. It's like peeling back the layers of a particularly unexpected onion!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe et al. (2018) has primarily focused on the relationship between online search trends and stock market movements, often centering on more conventional search terms such as "stock market predictions" or "investment tips." However, our investigation into the significance of Google searches for "how to annex Texas" on Broadcom's stock price is a novel addition to this burgeoning field of study. It's like the search term 'annexing Texas' is trying to steal the show!

In "Book," the authors find that market sentiment, as reflected in online searches, can indeed have a measurable impact on stock prices, aligning with our own findings in the context of the peculiar Texas annexation theme. It's like the stock market was just waiting for Texas-sized drama to unfold!

On the parallel track of economic indicators, Jones (2021) delves into the complexities of stock price fluctuations within the technology sector. Although the specific influence of Texas annexation searches on Broadcom's stock has not been previously studied, our work adds a quirky and unexpected dimension to the ongoing conversation surrounding market analysis. Perhaps Texas is not just big in size, but in market influence too!

Adding a touch of humor to the discourse, "Lorem and Ipsum" explore the unanticipated connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena in their work, exemplifying the delightful surprises that can emerge from interdisciplinary investigations. It's like the stock market is in for a wild west showdown with the Lone Star State!

Departing from the domain of traditional economic analyses, the non-fiction works "Competition Overcompeted" and "Monopolies 'R' Us" provide valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of corporate strategy and industry rivalry, enriching our understanding of the competitive forces at play in the stock market. It's like the stock market is a corporate battleground, and Texas wants in on the action!

In a whimsical twist, seminal works of fiction such as "Annexation Nation" and "Stockholm Surrender Syndrome" offer imaginative portrayals of territorial conquest and economic intrigue, prompting contemplation of the curious intersections between geopolitical ambition and market dynamics. It's like the stock market is the stage for an elaborate game of geopolitical chess, with Texas making unexpected moves!

Exploring audiovisual media, the TV series "Silicon Valley" and "Dallas" provide cultural touchstones that capture the ethos of corporate maneuvering and regional influence, offering potential parallels to the intricate dance between Google searches for Texas annexation and Broadcom's stock price. It's like the stock market is entering the world of soap operas - complete with surprise plot twists from the Lone Star State!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to annex texas' and Broadcom's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2010 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuation of Broadcom's stock price. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team delved into this unlikely pairing with unrelenting curiosity.

Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, we uncovered a striking interdependence. It seems that the online quests regarding Texas annexation may indeed hold the reins in steering Broadcom's stock price, providing a novel avenue for market analysis.

Perhaps those Google searches are secretly influencing the economy - it's like they're annexing their own little piece of stock market influence!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of politics and economics has long been a subject of interest for researchers and analysts alike. It is not often, however, that one comes across a correlation as unexpected and captivating as the one we have uncovered in our study. The peculiar relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuations of Broadcom's stock price has led us down a rabbit hole of inquiry and speculation. It's like the stock market and online search trends decided to square dance together!
As students of data and devotees of statistical inquiry, we were compelled to explore this enigmatic link further, and our findings have left us both astounded and amused. The idea that a seemingly niche and speculative topic like Texas annexation could have any bearing on the movements of a global corporation's stock price is certainly thought-provoking. It's as if the Lone Star State is putting the 'stock' in "stockyards"!
The implications of this intertwined relationship, should they prove consistent and reliable, could offer a novel perspective on the influence of public sentiment and mass opinion on market behavior. It's as if the market is saying, "Don't mess with Texas - unless you want your stock to take a tumble!"
In this paper, we delve into the methods and results of our investigation, presenting the evidence for this curious connection and considering the potential implications for both market analysis and the understanding of online search behavior. It's like peeling back the layers of a particularly unexpected onion!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The research team embarked on a quest across the vast expanse of the internet, scavenging for every bit of relevant information like determined digital archaeologists. It's like we were seeking the hidden treasure of statistical correlation. Primarily, data was procured from the illustrious archives of Google Trends, where the patterns of society's online curiosities are laid bare for all to see. We also tapped into the reservoir of market analytics offered by LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), with the intention of digging deep into the psyche of stock market movements. This process involved combing through data spanning the years 2010 to 2023, a comprehensive sweep of the digital landscape akin to charting unexplored territories. It's like we were boldly going where no dataset had gone before!

Measurement of Google Search Interest:
To quantify the public's intrigue in the hypothetical annexation of Texas, we utilized the Google Trends platform, which assigns relative search interest values. These values, normalized to the highest search volume within the specified time frame, transformed our pursuit of annexation-related queries into a quantifiable metric. It's like turning the quest for territorial expansion into a statistical conquest. The search interest values were then compared and cross-referenced with other pertinent datasets to uncover potential relationships. We were essentially playing detective with search queries, searching for clues to the elusive influence of internet rumblings on stock market rumbles.

Analysis of Stock Price Movements:
In parallel, the stock price movements of Broadcom, a prominent player in the semiconductor industry, were scrutinized with meticulous attention. This involved employing a mix of quantitative and qualitative analyses, examining historic stock prices, trading volumes, and market performance indicators. We took a deep dive into the economic seas, attempting to navigate the ebbs and flows of stock market tides. Our aim was to discern any synchronicity between the fluctuations of Broadcom's stock price and the cadence of Texas annexation-related Google searches. It's like we were studying the celestial constellations of market data, searching for an unexpected alignment of stars.

Statistical Computation:
The data from the two disparate domains, that of online search trends and stock market dynamics, was melded using statistical techniques, including but not limited to correlation analysis and time series modeling. The correlation coefficient, a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables, was calculated to ascertain the degree of association. It's like we were taking a mathematical rope to lasso the elusive connection between online intrigue and stock market sway. Additionally, p-values were computed to assess the statistical significance of our findings, providing a measure of confidence in the observed relationship. We had to make sure our findings weren't just an accidental correlation – we were looking for the real yee-haw deal!

Validity and Reliability:
Our approach was underpinned by the rigorous application of statistical principles and methodological rigor. We subjected our analyses to extensive validation and sensitivity testing to ensure the robustness and consistency of our findings. It's like we were building a sturdy stockade of evidence to fortify our hypothesis against the onslaught of skeptics. The resulting measures of statistical significance and effect size lent credence to our assertion of a meaningful association between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the undulations of Broadcom's stock price. It's like we discovered a true Lone Star correlation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to annex texas' and Broadcom's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2010 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8814981, r-squared of 0.7770388, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuation of Broadcom's stock price. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team delved into this unlikely pairing with unrelenting curiosity.

Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, we uncovered a striking interdependence. It seems that the online quests regarding Texas annexation may indeed hold the reins in steering Broadcom's stock price, providing a novel avenue for market analysis.

Perhaps those Google searches are secretly influencing the economy - it's like they're annexing their own little piece of stock market influence!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining of politics and economics has long been a subject of interest for researchers and analysts alike. It is not often, however, that one comes across a correlation as unexpected and captivating as the one we have uncovered in our study. The peculiar relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuations of Broadcom's stock price has led us down a rabbit hole of inquiry and speculation. It's like the stock market and online search trends decided to square dance together!
As students of data and devotees of statistical inquiry, we were compelled to explore this enigmatic link further, and our findings have left us both astounded and amused. The idea that a seemingly niche and speculative topic like Texas annexation could have any bearing on the movements of a global corporation's stock price is certainly thought-provoking. It's as if the Lone Star State is putting the 'stock' in "stockyards"!
The implications of this intertwined relationship, should they prove consistent and reliable, could offer a novel perspective on the influence of public sentiment and mass opinion on market behavior. It's as if the market is saying, "Don't mess with Texas - unless you want your stock to take a tumble!"
In this paper, we delve into the methods and results of our investigation, presenting the evidence for this curious connection and considering the potential implications for both market analysis and the understanding of online search behavior. It's like peeling back the layers of a particularly unexpected onion!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 between the volume of Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the changes in Broadcom's stock price. This correlation denotes a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It's like Texas and Broadcom are engaged in a Tex-Mex standoff, one influencing the other in a dance of economic and online search intrigue.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7770388 indicates that approximately 77.7% of the variation in Broadcom's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in Google searches for Texas annexation. It's as if Texas is asserting its influence over almost 80% of Broadcom's stock price movements, proving that everything is bigger in Texas, including its impact on stock prices!

The p-value being less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the relationship between the two variables. This suggests that the probability of observing such a strong association between Texas annexation searches and Broadcom's stock price movements by mere chance is incredibly low. It's like winning the lottery twice in a row – highly unlikely!

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts a clear and compelling pattern, with the volume of Google searches for Texas annexation aligning closely with the ebbs and flows of Broadcom's stock price. It's as if the Lone Star State's online aspirations for expansion are tightly intertwined with the performance of this semiconductor juggernaut.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to annex texas' and Broadcom's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuation of Broadcom's stock price. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team delved into this unlikely pairing with unrelenting curiosity.

Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, we uncovered a striking interdependence. It seems that the online quests regarding Texas annexation may indeed hold the reins in steering Broadcom's stock price, providing a novel avenue for market analysis.

Perhaps those Google searches are secretly influencing the economy - it's like they're annexing their own little piece of stock market influence!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe et al. (2018) has primarily focused on the relationship between online search trends and stock market movements, often centering on more conventional search terms such as "stock market predictions" or "investment tips." However, our investigation into the significance of Google searches for "how to annex Texas" on Broadcom's stock price is a novel addition to this burgeoning field of study. It's like the search term 'annexing Texas' is trying to steal the show!
In "Book," the authors find that market sentiment, as reflected in online searches, can indeed have a measurable impact on stock prices, aligning with our own findings in the context of the peculiar Texas annexation theme. It's like the stock market was just waiting for Texas-sized drama to unfold!
On the parallel track of economic indicators, Jones (2021) delves into the complexities of stock price fluctuations within the technology sector. Although the specific influence of Texas annexation searches on Broadcom's stock has not been previously studied, our work adds a quirky and unexpected dimension to the ongoing conversation surrounding market analysis. Perhaps Texas is not just big in size, but in market influence too!
Adding a touch of humor to the discourse, "Lorem and Ipsum" explore the unanticipated connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena in their work, exemplifying the delightful surprises that can emerge from interdisciplinary investigations. It's like the stock market is in for a wild west showdown with the Lone Star State!
Departing from the domain of traditional economic analyses, the non-fiction works "Competition Overcompeted" and "Monopolies 'R' Us" provide valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of corporate strategy and industry rivalry, enriching our understanding of the competitive forces at play in the stock market. It's like the stock market is a corporate battleground, and Texas wants in on the action!
In a whimsical twist, seminal works of fiction such as "Annexation Nation" and "Stockholm Surrender Syndrome" offer imaginative portrayals of territorial conquest and economic intrigue, prompting contemplation of the curious intersections between geopolitical ambition and market dynamics. It's like the stock market is the stage for an elaborate game of geopolitical chess, with Texas making unexpected moves!
Exploring audiovisual media, the TV series "Silicon Valley" and "Dallas" provide cultural touchstones that capture the ethos of corporate maneuvering and regional influence, offering potential parallels to the intricate dance between Google searches for Texas annexation and Broadcom's stock price. It's like the stock market is entering the world of soap operas - complete with surprise plot twists from the Lone Star State!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 between the volume of Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the changes in Broadcom's stock price. This correlation denotes a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It's like Texas and Broadcom are engaged in a Tex-Mex standoff, one influencing the other in a dance of economic and online search intrigue.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7770388 indicates that approximately 77.7% of the variation in Broadcom's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in Google searches for Texas annexation. It's as if Texas is asserting its influence over almost 80% of Broadcom's stock price movements, proving that everything is bigger in Texas, including its impact on stock prices!
The p-value being less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the relationship between the two variables. This suggests that the probability of observing such a strong association between Texas annexation searches and Broadcom's stock price movements by mere chance is incredibly low. It's like winning the lottery twice in a row – highly unlikely!
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts a clear and compelling pattern, with the volume of Google searches for Texas annexation aligning closely with the ebbs and flows of Broadcom's stock price. It's as if the Lone Star State's online aspirations for expansion are tightly intertwined with the performance of this semiconductor juggernaut.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study lend support to the prior research on the interplay between online search trends and stock market movements, echoing the quirky discoveries made by Lorem and Ipsum in their exploration of unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. The robust correlation coefficient and statistical significance observed in our analysis affirm the notion that online search behavior, even when manifesting in unconventional queries such as "how to annex Texas," can exert a tangible influence on stock prices. It's like those Google searches are slipping undercover as stock market movers!

Our results also align with the work of Jones (2021), who delves into the complexities of stock price fluctuations within the technology sector. While previous studies may have overlooked the potential impact of Texas annexation searches, our findings illustrate the gripping influence of these online quests on Broadcom's stock price dynamics. It's like Texas waltzing into the world of tech stocks!

Moreover, the unexpected parallels drawn from the literary and audiovisual realms, including the TV series "Dallas," provide cultural touchstones that mirror the intricate dance between Google searches for Texas annexation and Broadcom's stock price. These seemingly disparate domains converge in an unexpected display of interconnectedness, underscoring the multifaceted nature of market influences. It's like a real-life soap opera that even J.R. Ewing couldn't have scripted!

The substantial r-squared value obtained in our analysis underscores the intricate relationship between the volume of Texas annexation searches and the variations in Broadcom's stock price, echoing the sentiment that the Lone Star State's online aspirations possess a considerable sway over the semiconductor market. It's like Texas issuing a bullish decree over the stock market!

In a light-hearted analogy, it seems that Texas's online aspirations for expansion are akin to a stock market rodeo, guiding Broadcom's stock price through a Texan-style dance of economic and online search intrigue. As the adage goes, everything is bigger in Texas, including its impact on stock prices!

In the grand tableau of market dynamics, our study unfurls a compelling narrative of how unconventional online search trends, when examined with scholarly acumen, can unveil unsuspected connections to stock market movements. It's as if the market is a stage for the most unexpected plot twists – and Texas is stealing the show!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to annex texas' and Broadcom's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuation of Broadcom's stock price. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team delved into this unlikely pairing with unrelenting curiosity.

Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, we uncovered a striking interdependence. It seems that the online quests regarding Texas annexation may indeed hold the reins in steering Broadcom's stock price, providing a novel avenue for market analysis.

Perhaps those Google searches are secretly influencing the economy - it's like they're annexing their own little piece of stock market influence!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining of politics and economics has long been a subject of interest for researchers and analysts alike. It is not often, however, that one comes across a correlation as unexpected and captivating as the one we have uncovered in our study. The peculiar relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuations of Broadcom's stock price has led us down a rabbit hole of inquiry and speculation. It's like the stock market and online search trends decided to square dance together!
As students of data and devotees of statistical inquiry, we were compelled to explore this enigmatic link further, and our findings have left us both astounded and amused. The idea that a seemingly niche and speculative topic like Texas annexation could have any bearing on the movements of a global corporation's stock price is certainly thought-provoking. It's as if the Lone Star State is putting the 'stock' in "stockyards"!
The implications of this intertwined relationship, should they prove consistent and reliable, could offer a novel perspective on the influence of public sentiment and mass opinion on market behavior. It's as if the market is saying, "Don't mess with Texas - unless you want your stock to take a tumble!"
In this paper, we delve into the methods and results of our investigation, presenting the evidence for this curious connection and considering the potential implications for both market analysis and the understanding of online search behavior. It's like peeling back the layers of a particularly unexpected onion!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 between the volume of Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the changes in Broadcom's stock price. This correlation denotes a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It's like Texas and Broadcom are engaged in a Tex-Mex standoff, one influencing the other in a dance of economic and online search intrigue.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7770388 indicates that approximately 77.7% of the variation in Broadcom's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in Google searches for Texas annexation. It's as if Texas is asserting its influence over almost 80% of Broadcom's stock price movements, proving that everything is bigger in Texas, including its impact on stock prices!
The p-value being less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the relationship between the two variables. This suggests that the probability of observing such a strong association between Texas annexation searches and Broadcom's stock price movements by mere chance is incredibly low. It's like winning the lottery twice in a row – highly unlikely!
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts a clear and compelling pattern, with the volume of Google searches for Texas annexation aligning closely with the ebbs and flows of Broadcom's stock price. It's as if the Lone Star State's online aspirations for expansion are tightly intertwined with the performance of this semiconductor juggernaut.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has shed light on a surprisingly robust relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and Broadcom's stock price fluctuations. It appears that the Lone Star State's virtual ambitions may hold a sway over the movements of this tech giant's stock. It's as if everything's bigger in Texas, including its impact on stock prices – everything's bigger, even its search influence!

The statistically significant correlation coefficient and the substantial r-squared value indicate a compelling association, suggesting that a significant portion of Broadcom's stock price variability can be attributed to the online yearnings for Texas expansion. It's like the stock market is doing the two-step with Texas search trends, and they're in perfect harmony!

The implications of these findings extend beyond mere curiosity, offering a potential new lens through which to view market dynamics and the interplay between online behavior and economic outcomes. It's as if Google searches for "how to annex Texas" are becoming a hidden variable in our economic equations – a real game-changer!

With that said, it seems evident that no further research is necessary in this particular area. After all, when it comes to investigating the influence of Texas annexation searches on Broadcom's stock price, it seems we've covered all the 'stock'-yard.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Digital Geopolitics and Economic Frictions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Economic Data Analysis and Stock Market Impact Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Texan Tug-of-War: Tracking Google Searches for Texas Annexation and the Tremors on Broadcom's Stock with an abstract of This paper explores the intriguing relationship between Google searches for "how to annex Texas" and the fluctuation of Broadcom's stock price. Leveraging data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team delved into this unlikely pairing with unrelenting curiosity.
Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.8814981 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, we uncovered a striking interdependence. It seems that the online quests regarding Texas annexation may indeed hold the reins in steering Broadcom's stock price, providing a novel avenue for market analysis.
Perhaps those Google searches are secretly influencing the economy - it's like they're annexing their own little piece of stock market influence!

ChatGPT:

Texas annexation, Google searches, Broadcom stock, stock market analysis, correlation coefficient, market influence, LSEG Analytics, Google Trends, stock price fluctuation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'how to annex texas'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to annex texas' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to annex texas'

Broadcom's stock price (AVGO)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Broadcom (AVGO) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Broadcom's stock price (AVGO)

Correlation r = 0.8814981 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7770388 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Broadcom's stock price (AVGO)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'how to annex texas') over the 14 years from 2010 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.08E-5. 0.0000308266135245242750000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 0.00308% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 32,440 random variables You don't actually need 32 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'how to annex texas' (Rel. search volume)9.166674.756.083339.258.666679.583338.5910.59.6666711.58331114.666715.3333
Broadcom's stock price (AVGO) (Stock price)18.328.729.4832.4352.85100.93142.07178.29259.77248.85319.32439.33666.32565




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9.16667,4.75,6.08333,9.25,8.66667,9.58333,8.5,9,10.5,9.66667,11.5833,11,14.6667,15.3333,])
array_2 = np.array([18.3,28.7,29.48,32.43,52.85,100.93,142.07,178.29,259.77,248.85,319.32,439.33,666.32,565,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'how to annex texas'"
array_2_name = "Broadcom's stock price (AVGO)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1072 · Black Variable ID: 1477 · Red Variable ID: 1559
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0