about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #8,071 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Google searches for 'shrek'.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time Tom lures viewers with a catchy title, the algorithm gives Shrek a little internet spotlight. So, as Tom’s clickbait prowess grows, so does the ogre's online fame. It’s like a clickbait cascade, leading to a Shrek search surge. Shrek is love, Shrek is clickbait!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that shows a vibrant graph with two intersecting lines. One line depicts the surge in Tom Scott's clickbait-y YouTube video titles while the other line represents the parallel surge in Google searches for "Shrek." The surge in both lines is depicted as a steep incline, symbolizing the growing online fame of the beloved ogre. The graph should visually capture the whirlwind of clickbait and Shrek excitement, with a green ogre happily emerging from the depths of the internet, showcasing the intersection of the two trends. The visual depiction should be simple, vibrant, and accurately represent the growing popularity of Shrek online. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro Brutalism Parallax art a Polaroid photo Pop art
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek', in the following situation: Every time Tom lures viewers with a catchy title, the algorithm gives Shrek a little internet spotlight. So, as Tom’s clickbait prowess grows, so does the ogre's online fame. It’s like a clickbait cascade, leading to a Shrek search surge. Shrek is love, Shrek is clickbait!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A vibrant graph shows the surge in Tom Scott's clickbait-y YouTube video titles as a steep incline, accompanied by a parallel surge in Google searches for "Shrek" depicted as a green ogre happily emerging from the depths of the internet. The lines on the graph intersect like a whirlwind of clickbait and Shrek excitement, capturing the growing online fame of the beloved ogre.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: A vibrant graph shows the surge in Tom Scott's clickbait-y YouTube video titles as a steep incline, accompanied by a parallel surge in Google searches for "Shrek" depicted as a green ogre happily emerging from the depths of the internet. The lines on the graph intersect like a whirlwind of clickbait and Shrek excitement, capturing the growing online fame of the beloved ogre. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that shows a vibrant graph with two intersecting lines. One line depicts the surge in Tom Scott's clickbait-y YouTube video titles while the other line represents the parallel surge in Google searches for "Shrek." The surge in both lines is depicted as a steep incline, symbolizing the growing online fame of the beloved ogre. The graph should visually capture the whirlwind of clickbait and Shrek excitement, with a green ogre happily emerging from the depths of the internet, showcasing the intersection of the two trends. The visual depiction should be simple, vibrant, and accurately represent the growing popularity of Shrek online.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are positively influenced shrek (Google searches for 'shrek').\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'

The Journal of Internet Linguistics and Popular Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between online content and user engagement has become a subject of increasing interest in the digital age. In this study, we endeavor to shed light on a peculiar phenomenon that begs the question: is there a correlation between the clickbait-iness of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the public's interest in the iconic green ogre, 'Shrek'? Leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Tom Scott's video titles and comprehensive data from Google Trends, we sought to uncover a potential link between these seemingly disparate entities.

Through meticulous examination of video titles released from 2009 to 2023, a remarkable association emerged, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as Tom Scott's video titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, there is a marked surge in Google searches for 'Shrek', defying conventional expectations. The implications of this intriguing correlation extend beyond mere amusement, prompting further inquiry into the intricate dynamics of online content and audience behavior.

This investigation not only offers a whimsical perspective on the digital landscape but also underscores the unexpected connections that underlie the contemporary online experience. As researchers delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of digital interactions, the enigma of clickbait and its curious consequences continues to present fertile ground for exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between online content and user engagement has become a subject of increasing interest in the digital age. In this study, we endeavor to shed light on a peculiar phenomenon that begs the question: is there a correlation between the clickbait-iness of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the public's interest in the iconic green ogre, 'Shrek'? Leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Tom Scott's video titles and comprehensive data from Google Trends, we sought to uncover a potential link between these seemingly disparate entities.

Through meticulous examination of video titles released from 2009 to 2023, a remarkable association emerged, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as Tom Scott's video titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, there is a marked surge in Google searches for 'Shrek', defying conventional expectations. The implications of this intriguing correlation extend beyond mere amusement, prompting further inquiry into the intricate dynamics of online content and audience behavior.

This investigation not only offers a whimsical perspective on the digital landscape but also underscores the unexpected connections that underlie the contemporary online experience. As researchers delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of digital interactions, the enigma of clickbait and its curious consequences continues to present fertile ground for exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the vast, labyrinthine realm of the internet, the quest for engaging content rages on, perpetually fueled by the insatiable appetite of the digital denizens. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the symbiotic relationship between creators and consumers of online content has become a subject of increasing fascination and hilarity -- the latter often arising from myriad descriptions of "clickbait" and its tantalizing allure. At the forefront of this captivating dance between content and clicks stands the provocative figure of Tom Scott, whose YouTube channel has garnered a devoted following for his astute observations and, if we may be so bold, titillating titles.

While the world of digital content creation remains a bubbly cauldron of humor and curiosity, our study probes into the peculiar terrain where the art of clickbait intersects with the unlikely realm of 'Shrek'. Raising both eyebrows and questions, we seek to unravel the enigmatic connection between the clickbait-y siren call of Tom Scott's video titles and the resounding crescendo of Google searches for the lovable green ogre. In essence, we explore whether the titillating power of clickbait transcends into the depths of the Shrek-worshipping digital populace.

Employing the finest tools of artificial intelligence (AI) and the rigorous analysis of Google Trends data, our investigation seeks to demystify the entwined fate of clickbait and Shrek, encapsulating the mercurial dance between a creator's linguistic seduction and the audience's unrelenting quest for ogre-related content. Through the lens of statistics and the art of observation, this study aims to illuminate the unexpected relationships that underlie the ebb and flow of online intrigue, all with a nod and a wink to the capricious nature of the digital scape.

Our endeavor delves into the lighthearted yet profound juncture where the seemingly arbitrary forces of clickbait and the timeless appeal of 'Shrek' converge, employing the intrepid spirit of scientific inquiry to unearth the delightful and confounding correlations that lay hidden in plain sight. As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the digital ether, we invite fellow scholars and jesters alike to revel in the bemusing tapestry of connections that tether the online world together – because, after all, what's research without a sprinkle of the unexpected and the absurd?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between online content and user engagement has become a subject of increasing interest in the digital age. In this study, we endeavor to shed light on a peculiar phenomenon that begs the question: is there a correlation between the clickbait-iness of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the public's interest in the iconic green ogre, 'Shrek'? Leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Tom Scott's video titles and comprehensive data from Google Trends, we sought to uncover a potential link between these seemingly disparate entities.

Through meticulous examination of video titles released from 2009 to 2023, a remarkable association emerged, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as Tom Scott's video titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, there is a marked surge in Google searches for 'Shrek', defying conventional expectations. The implications of this intriguing correlation extend beyond mere amusement, prompting further inquiry into the intricate dynamics of online content and audience behavior.

This investigation not only offers a whimsical perspective on the digital landscape but also underscores the unexpected connections that underlie the contemporary online experience. As researchers delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of digital interactions, the enigma of clickbait and its curious consequences continues to present fertile ground for exploration.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast, labyrinthine realm of the internet, the quest for engaging content rages on, perpetually fueled by the insatiable appetite of the digital denizens. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the symbiotic relationship between creators and consumers of online content has become a subject of increasing fascination and hilarity -- the latter often arising from myriad descriptions of "clickbait" and its tantalizing allure. At the forefront of this captivating dance between content and clicks stands the provocative figure of Tom Scott, whose YouTube channel has garnered a devoted following for his astute observations and, if we may be so bold, titillating titles.
While the world of digital content creation remains a bubbly cauldron of humor and curiosity, our study probes into the peculiar terrain where the art of clickbait intersects with the unlikely realm of 'Shrek'. Raising both eyebrows and questions, we seek to unravel the enigmatic connection between the clickbait-y siren call of Tom Scott's video titles and the resounding crescendo of Google searches for the lovable green ogre. In essence, we explore whether the titillating power of clickbait transcends into the depths of the Shrek-worshipping digital populace.
Employing the finest tools of artificial intelligence (AI) and the rigorous analysis of Google Trends data, our investigation seeks to demystify the entwined fate of clickbait and Shrek, encapsulating the mercurial dance between a creator's linguistic seduction and the audience's unrelenting quest for ogre-related content. Through the lens of statistics and the art of observation, this study aims to illuminate the unexpected relationships that underlie the ebb and flow of online intrigue, all with a nod and a wink to the capricious nature of the digital scape.
Our endeavor delves into the lighthearted yet profound juncture where the seemingly arbitrary forces of clickbait and the timeless appeal of 'Shrek' converge, employing the intrepid spirit of scientific inquiry to unearth the delightful and confounding correlations that lay hidden in plain sight. As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the digital ether, we invite fellow scholars and jesters alike to revel in the bemusing tapestry of connections that tether the online world together – because, after all, what's research without a sprinkle of the unexpected and the absurd?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The scholarly pursuit of digital content and its intricate effects on audience behavior has led to a diverse array of investigations, each endeavoring to unravel the convoluted tapestry of the online world. In examining the captivating interplay between Tom Scott's tantalizing video titles and the resounding searches for 'Shrek', we encounter a compendium of studies that lay the groundwork for our whimsical odyssey.

In their pivotal work, Smith and Doe (2017) dissect the linguistic seduction that underlies clickbait, invoking cognitive theories to uncover the subtle allure of attention-grabbing titles. Their findings, while gravity-bound, serve as a springboard for our foray into the unconventional terrain where the whimsy of clickbait mingles with the fascination for a beloved ogre.

Jones (2020) extends this discourse by delving into the psychology of user engagement, unveiling the proclivities that govern audience reactions to tantalizing online content. The lighthearted examination of user behavior in the digital arena beckons us to consider the inherent whimsicality that underpins the search for 'Shrek' in the wake of clickbait-infused stimuli.

Expanding the horizon of literary inquiry, "The Art of Persuasion in the Digital Age" by Brown (2018) provides invaluable insights into the craft of enticement within the online sphere. The juxtaposition of persuasive techniques and audience response sets the stage for our exploration of the peculiar resonance between Tom Scott's clickbait-y titles and the unanticipated echoes of 'Shrek' that reverberate through the annals of Google searches.

In a lighter vein, the whimsical musings of "The Psychology of Humor" by Martin (2016) offer subtle nuances on the enigmatic confluence of comedic appeal and audience engagement. While ostensibly unrelated to our realm of inquiry, the undercurrents of humor permeate the digital landscape, leaving room for the unforeseen connections that enliven our investigation.

As we spiral into the world of fictional narratives, the realm of 'Shrek' beckons us to dwell in the whimsical expanse of the franchise's mythology. From "Shrek: The Unexplored Fables" by Grimm (1812) to "The Unveiling of Ogres" by Tolkien (1954), the iconic allure of the green ogre has pervaded the collective consciousness, inspiring a multifaceted tapestry of speculative literature that skitters along the periphery of reality.

In the cinematic realm, the vibrant hues of DreamWorks' "Shrek" series, alongside the resplendent wit of "Her," "The Social Network," and "The Matrix," collectively beckon us to contemplate the unpredictably capricious pathways that lead the human mind to quest for the enigmatic 'Shrek' amidst the digital wilderness.

The labyrinthine web of literature and popular culture weaves a colorful backdrop for our inquiry, evoking the essence of whimsy that percolates through the fabric of human curiosity. As we navigate the intellectual universe, our traversal through the unexpected twists and turns of scholarship mirrors the giddy unpredictability that animates the digital domain.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and Google Trends . You used data from 2009 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between online content and user engagement has become a subject of increasing interest in the digital age. In this study, we endeavor to shed light on a peculiar phenomenon that begs the question: is there a correlation between the clickbait-iness of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the public's interest in the iconic green ogre, 'Shrek'? Leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Tom Scott's video titles and comprehensive data from Google Trends, we sought to uncover a potential link between these seemingly disparate entities.

Through meticulous examination of video titles released from 2009 to 2023, a remarkable association emerged, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as Tom Scott's video titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, there is a marked surge in Google searches for 'Shrek', defying conventional expectations. The implications of this intriguing correlation extend beyond mere amusement, prompting further inquiry into the intricate dynamics of online content and audience behavior.

This investigation not only offers a whimsical perspective on the digital landscape but also underscores the unexpected connections that underlie the contemporary online experience. As researchers delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of digital interactions, the enigma of clickbait and its curious consequences continues to present fertile ground for exploration.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast, labyrinthine realm of the internet, the quest for engaging content rages on, perpetually fueled by the insatiable appetite of the digital denizens. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the symbiotic relationship between creators and consumers of online content has become a subject of increasing fascination and hilarity -- the latter often arising from myriad descriptions of "clickbait" and its tantalizing allure. At the forefront of this captivating dance between content and clicks stands the provocative figure of Tom Scott, whose YouTube channel has garnered a devoted following for his astute observations and, if we may be so bold, titillating titles.
While the world of digital content creation remains a bubbly cauldron of humor and curiosity, our study probes into the peculiar terrain where the art of clickbait intersects with the unlikely realm of 'Shrek'. Raising both eyebrows and questions, we seek to unravel the enigmatic connection between the clickbait-y siren call of Tom Scott's video titles and the resounding crescendo of Google searches for the lovable green ogre. In essence, we explore whether the titillating power of clickbait transcends into the depths of the Shrek-worshipping digital populace.
Employing the finest tools of artificial intelligence (AI) and the rigorous analysis of Google Trends data, our investigation seeks to demystify the entwined fate of clickbait and Shrek, encapsulating the mercurial dance between a creator's linguistic seduction and the audience's unrelenting quest for ogre-related content. Through the lens of statistics and the art of observation, this study aims to illuminate the unexpected relationships that underlie the ebb and flow of online intrigue, all with a nod and a wink to the capricious nature of the digital scape.
Our endeavor delves into the lighthearted yet profound juncture where the seemingly arbitrary forces of clickbait and the timeless appeal of 'Shrek' converge, employing the intrepid spirit of scientific inquiry to unearth the delightful and confounding correlations that lay hidden in plain sight. As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the digital ether, we invite fellow scholars and jesters alike to revel in the bemusing tapestry of connections that tether the online world together – because, after all, what's research without a sprinkle of the unexpected and the absurd?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this eccentric expedition into the peculiar nexus of clickbait and 'Shrek', we designed a methodological approach that mirrored the whimsical nature of our subject matter. We harnessed the power of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to scrutinize the clickbait levels of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles, coupled with comprehensive data sourced from Google Trends from the chronicles of 2009 to 2023. With a concoction of statistical tinkering and tongue-in-cheek analysis, we sought to distill the elusive essence of clickbait and its influence on the enchanting ogre, 'Shrek'.

Our study chips away at the bedrock of data, dissecting Tom Scott's ever-captivating video titles using a blend of sentiment analysis, linguistic gymnastics, and the occasional sigh of exasperation at the perplexing intricacies invariably emerging from such analysis. These clicks of statistical alchemy unveiled the tantalizing spectrum of clickbait, from the subtly enticing to the irresistibly provocative, shaping the trajectory of user engagement with every alluring phrase and cunning pun.

As for 'Shrek', the enigmatic green giant who looms large in the annals of internet lore, we tracked the ebb and flow of public interest through the labyrinthine corridors of Google searches. Our examination, conducted with equal parts mirth and gravitas, navigated through the peaks and troughs of 'Shrek' inquiries, capturing the fervent fascination and seemingly unyielding allure of this timeless cinematic figure.

Unleashing the arsenal of statistical tools, we ventured beyond the realms of conventional correlation analysis to unfurl the hidden associations between Tom Scott's clickbait-infused titles and the tremors of 'Shrek' searches on the digital landscape. In doing so, we wielded the skeptic's razor to discern spurious correlations from the genuine, culminating in the revelation of a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a p-value less than 0.01, transcending the realm of statistical happenstance to bestow upon us the gift of substantive conclusion.

In essence, our methodology dances on the fringes of traditional research, daring to waltz with the capricious spirits of digital content and online intrigue. By infusing the scientific rigor with unconventional charm, our study orchestrates a symphony of data and curiosity, harmonizing the elements of jest and inquiry in a playful pas de deux through the virtual expanse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and Google Trends .

For the time period 2009 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9203884, r-squared of 0.8471148, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between online content and user engagement has become a subject of increasing interest in the digital age. In this study, we endeavor to shed light on a peculiar phenomenon that begs the question: is there a correlation between the clickbait-iness of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the public's interest in the iconic green ogre, 'Shrek'? Leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Tom Scott's video titles and comprehensive data from Google Trends, we sought to uncover a potential link between these seemingly disparate entities.

Through meticulous examination of video titles released from 2009 to 2023, a remarkable association emerged, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as Tom Scott's video titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, there is a marked surge in Google searches for 'Shrek', defying conventional expectations. The implications of this intriguing correlation extend beyond mere amusement, prompting further inquiry into the intricate dynamics of online content and audience behavior.

This investigation not only offers a whimsical perspective on the digital landscape but also underscores the unexpected connections that underlie the contemporary online experience. As researchers delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of digital interactions, the enigma of clickbait and its curious consequences continues to present fertile ground for exploration.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the vast, labyrinthine realm of the internet, the quest for engaging content rages on, perpetually fueled by the insatiable appetite of the digital denizens. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the symbiotic relationship between creators and consumers of online content has become a subject of increasing fascination and hilarity -- the latter often arising from myriad descriptions of "clickbait" and its tantalizing allure. At the forefront of this captivating dance between content and clicks stands the provocative figure of Tom Scott, whose YouTube channel has garnered a devoted following for his astute observations and, if we may be so bold, titillating titles.
While the world of digital content creation remains a bubbly cauldron of humor and curiosity, our study probes into the peculiar terrain where the art of clickbait intersects with the unlikely realm of 'Shrek'. Raising both eyebrows and questions, we seek to unravel the enigmatic connection between the clickbait-y siren call of Tom Scott's video titles and the resounding crescendo of Google searches for the lovable green ogre. In essence, we explore whether the titillating power of clickbait transcends into the depths of the Shrek-worshipping digital populace.
Employing the finest tools of artificial intelligence (AI) and the rigorous analysis of Google Trends data, our investigation seeks to demystify the entwined fate of clickbait and Shrek, encapsulating the mercurial dance between a creator's linguistic seduction and the audience's unrelenting quest for ogre-related content. Through the lens of statistics and the art of observation, this study aims to illuminate the unexpected relationships that underlie the ebb and flow of online intrigue, all with a nod and a wink to the capricious nature of the digital scape.
Our endeavor delves into the lighthearted yet profound juncture where the seemingly arbitrary forces of clickbait and the timeless appeal of 'Shrek' converge, employing the intrepid spirit of scientific inquiry to unearth the delightful and confounding correlations that lay hidden in plain sight. As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the digital ether, we invite fellow scholars and jesters alike to revel in the bemusing tapestry of connections that tether the online world together – because, after all, what's research without a sprinkle of the unexpected and the absurd?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the clickbait-y nature of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the search interest in 'Shrek'. Over the period of 2009 to 2023, a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 was observed, indicating a robust positive relationship between the click-worthy allure of Tom Scott's video titles and the public's fervent pursuit of all things Shrek.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8471148 signifies that approximately 84.7% of the variability in Google searches for 'Shrek' can be explained by the variability in the clickbait factor of Tom Scott's video titles. This unexpectedly strong association offers compelling evidence of the captivating influence wielded by engaging video titles, transcending the digital realm to evoke a surge of interest in the endearing green ogre.

The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. It appears that the irresistible allure of clickbait, as encapsulated in Tom Scott's tantalizing titles, exerts a palpable gravitational pull on the search behaviors of internet users, precipitating a pronounced spike in 'Shrek' inquiries.

Notably, Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the clickbait-y nature of Tom Scott's video titles and the rise in Google searches for 'Shrek'. The unmistakably upward trajectory of the data points underscores the synchronous ascent of interest in 'Shrek' as Tom Scott's titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, lending visual credence to the robust statistical findings.

These findings challenge conventional expectations and beckon further inquiry into the whimsical dynamics of online content and audience engagement. The unexpectedly strong association between clickbait and 'Shrek' underscores the multilayered interactions that underpin the digital milieu, inviting curious minds to delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of online intrigue with a lighthearted spirit and a knowing grin.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between online content and user engagement has become a subject of increasing interest in the digital age. In this study, we endeavor to shed light on a peculiar phenomenon that begs the question: is there a correlation between the clickbait-iness of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the public's interest in the iconic green ogre, 'Shrek'? Leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Tom Scott's video titles and comprehensive data from Google Trends, we sought to uncover a potential link between these seemingly disparate entities.

Through meticulous examination of video titles released from 2009 to 2023, a remarkable association emerged, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as Tom Scott's video titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, there is a marked surge in Google searches for 'Shrek', defying conventional expectations. The implications of this intriguing correlation extend beyond mere amusement, prompting further inquiry into the intricate dynamics of online content and audience behavior.

This investigation not only offers a whimsical perspective on the digital landscape but also underscores the unexpected connections that underlie the contemporary online experience. As researchers delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of digital interactions, the enigma of clickbait and its curious consequences continues to present fertile ground for exploration.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The scholarly pursuit of digital content and its intricate effects on audience behavior has led to a diverse array of investigations, each endeavoring to unravel the convoluted tapestry of the online world. In examining the captivating interplay between Tom Scott's tantalizing video titles and the resounding searches for 'Shrek', we encounter a compendium of studies that lay the groundwork for our whimsical odyssey.
In their pivotal work, Smith and Doe (2017) dissect the linguistic seduction that underlies clickbait, invoking cognitive theories to uncover the subtle allure of attention-grabbing titles. Their findings, while gravity-bound, serve as a springboard for our foray into the unconventional terrain where the whimsy of clickbait mingles with the fascination for a beloved ogre.
Jones (2020) extends this discourse by delving into the psychology of user engagement, unveiling the proclivities that govern audience reactions to tantalizing online content. The lighthearted examination of user behavior in the digital arena beckons us to consider the inherent whimsicality that underpins the search for 'Shrek' in the wake of clickbait-infused stimuli.
Expanding the horizon of literary inquiry, "The Art of Persuasion in the Digital Age" by Brown (2018) provides invaluable insights into the craft of enticement within the online sphere. The juxtaposition of persuasive techniques and audience response sets the stage for our exploration of the peculiar resonance between Tom Scott's clickbait-y titles and the unanticipated echoes of 'Shrek' that reverberate through the annals of Google searches.
In a lighter vein, the whimsical musings of "The Psychology of Humor" by Martin (2016) offer subtle nuances on the enigmatic confluence of comedic appeal and audience engagement. While ostensibly unrelated to our realm of inquiry, the undercurrents of humor permeate the digital landscape, leaving room for the unforeseen connections that enliven our investigation.
As we spiral into the world of fictional narratives, the realm of 'Shrek' beckons us to dwell in the whimsical expanse of the franchise's mythology. From "Shrek: The Unexplored Fables" by Grimm (1812) to "The Unveiling of Ogres" by Tolkien (1954), the iconic allure of the green ogre has pervaded the collective consciousness, inspiring a multifaceted tapestry of speculative literature that skitters along the periphery of reality.
In the cinematic realm, the vibrant hues of DreamWorks' "Shrek" series, alongside the resplendent wit of "Her," "The Social Network," and "The Matrix," collectively beckon us to contemplate the unpredictably capricious pathways that lead the human mind to quest for the enigmatic 'Shrek' amidst the digital wilderness.
The labyrinthine web of literature and popular culture weaves a colorful backdrop for our inquiry, evoking the essence of whimsy that percolates through the fabric of human curiosity. As we navigate the intellectual universe, our traversal through the unexpected twists and turns of scholarship mirrors the giddy unpredictability that animates the digital domain.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the clickbait-y nature of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the search interest in 'Shrek'. Over the period of 2009 to 2023, a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 was observed, indicating a robust positive relationship between the click-worthy allure of Tom Scott's video titles and the public's fervent pursuit of all things Shrek.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8471148 signifies that approximately 84.7% of the variability in Google searches for 'Shrek' can be explained by the variability in the clickbait factor of Tom Scott's video titles. This unexpectedly strong association offers compelling evidence of the captivating influence wielded by engaging video titles, transcending the digital realm to evoke a surge of interest in the endearing green ogre.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. It appears that the irresistible allure of clickbait, as encapsulated in Tom Scott's tantalizing titles, exerts a palpable gravitational pull on the search behaviors of internet users, precipitating a pronounced spike in 'Shrek' inquiries.
Notably, Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the clickbait-y nature of Tom Scott's video titles and the rise in Google searches for 'Shrek'. The unmistakably upward trajectory of the data points underscores the synchronous ascent of interest in 'Shrek' as Tom Scott's titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, lending visual credence to the robust statistical findings.
These findings challenge conventional expectations and beckon further inquiry into the whimsical dynamics of online content and audience engagement. The unexpectedly strong association between clickbait and 'Shrek' underscores the multilayered interactions that underpin the digital milieu, inviting curious minds to delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of online intrigue with a lighthearted spirit and a knowing grin.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The intriguing correlation uncovered in this study between Tom Scott's clickbait-y video titles and the surge in 'Shrek' searches beckons us to contemplate the whimsical enigma of digital engagement. Our findings not only add a touch of mirth to scholarly discourse but also offer substantive evidence of the unanticipated resonance between seemingly incongruous phenomena. The positive relationship between the allure of clickbait and the fascination for the green ogre upends conventional expectations, prompting a playful twirl in the hallowed halls of statistical scrutiny.

Our results echo the quirky revelations of Smith and Doe's (2017) linguistic seduction and Jones's (2020) whimsical examination of audience behavior, reaffirming the captivating allure that underlies the dance of digital engagement. The unexpected resonance between these findings and our own serves as a comical interlude within the canvas of rigorous inquiry, inviting us to revel in the delightful unpredictability that threads through the tapestry of scholarly exploration.

The Disneyesque nature of the relationship captured in our statistical analysis transcends the realm of mere statistical jollification, provoking a chuckle-worthy contemplation of the capricious pathways that underpin the human curiosity perfume. As we bask in the whimsical glimmer of our findings, we are reminded of the intricate ballet that animates the scholarly pursuit, infusing the rarefied air of academia with a beguiling hint of levity.

The visual depiction of our findings in Figure 1 paints a gleeful landscape of interconnected whimsy, underscoring the synchronous rhythm that orchestrates the ascent of 'Shrek' inquiries alongside the clickbait charm of Tom Scott's titles. The merry jiggle observed in the scatterplot bespeaks the effervescent interplay that tantalizes the digital psyche, inspiring a celebratory embrace of the unexpected connections that enliven our ponderous statistical journey.

In the grand tradition of academic exploration, our research exalts the sprightly revelry of scholarly inquiry, elevating the quirky dalliances of statistical scrutiny to a joyous romp through the unforeseen correlations that playfully embellish the landscapes of knowledge. As we bid adieu to this discussion section, we depart with a wry smile, embracing the whimsical discoveries that bedeck the solemn stage of scientific inquiry with a hint of delightful absurdity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'shrek'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The interplay between online content and user engagement has become a subject of increasing interest in the digital age. In this study, we endeavor to shed light on a peculiar phenomenon that begs the question: is there a correlation between the clickbait-iness of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the public's interest in the iconic green ogre, 'Shrek'? Leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Tom Scott's video titles and comprehensive data from Google Trends, we sought to uncover a potential link between these seemingly disparate entities.

Through meticulous examination of video titles released from 2009 to 2023, a remarkable association emerged, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as Tom Scott's video titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, there is a marked surge in Google searches for 'Shrek', defying conventional expectations. The implications of this intriguing correlation extend beyond mere amusement, prompting further inquiry into the intricate dynamics of online content and audience behavior.

This investigation not only offers a whimsical perspective on the digital landscape but also underscores the unexpected connections that underlie the contemporary online experience. As researchers delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of digital interactions, the enigma of clickbait and its curious consequences continues to present fertile ground for exploration.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the vast, labyrinthine realm of the internet, the quest for engaging content rages on, perpetually fueled by the insatiable appetite of the digital denizens. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the symbiotic relationship between creators and consumers of online content has become a subject of increasing fascination and hilarity -- the latter often arising from myriad descriptions of "clickbait" and its tantalizing allure. At the forefront of this captivating dance between content and clicks stands the provocative figure of Tom Scott, whose YouTube channel has garnered a devoted following for his astute observations and, if we may be so bold, titillating titles.
While the world of digital content creation remains a bubbly cauldron of humor and curiosity, our study probes into the peculiar terrain where the art of clickbait intersects with the unlikely realm of 'Shrek'. Raising both eyebrows and questions, we seek to unravel the enigmatic connection between the clickbait-y siren call of Tom Scott's video titles and the resounding crescendo of Google searches for the lovable green ogre. In essence, we explore whether the titillating power of clickbait transcends into the depths of the Shrek-worshipping digital populace.
Employing the finest tools of artificial intelligence (AI) and the rigorous analysis of Google Trends data, our investigation seeks to demystify the entwined fate of clickbait and Shrek, encapsulating the mercurial dance between a creator's linguistic seduction and the audience's unrelenting quest for ogre-related content. Through the lens of statistics and the art of observation, this study aims to illuminate the unexpected relationships that underlie the ebb and flow of online intrigue, all with a nod and a wink to the capricious nature of the digital scape.
Our endeavor delves into the lighthearted yet profound juncture where the seemingly arbitrary forces of clickbait and the timeless appeal of 'Shrek' converge, employing the intrepid spirit of scientific inquiry to unearth the delightful and confounding correlations that lay hidden in plain sight. As we embark on this whimsical odyssey through the digital ether, we invite fellow scholars and jesters alike to revel in the bemusing tapestry of connections that tether the online world together – because, after all, what's research without a sprinkle of the unexpected and the absurd?

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the clickbait-y nature of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the search interest in 'Shrek'. Over the period of 2009 to 2023, a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 was observed, indicating a robust positive relationship between the click-worthy allure of Tom Scott's video titles and the public's fervent pursuit of all things Shrek.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8471148 signifies that approximately 84.7% of the variability in Google searches for 'Shrek' can be explained by the variability in the clickbait factor of Tom Scott's video titles. This unexpectedly strong association offers compelling evidence of the captivating influence wielded by engaging video titles, transcending the digital realm to evoke a surge of interest in the endearing green ogre.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. It appears that the irresistible allure of clickbait, as encapsulated in Tom Scott's tantalizing titles, exerts a palpable gravitational pull on the search behaviors of internet users, precipitating a pronounced spike in 'Shrek' inquiries.
Notably, Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the clickbait-y nature of Tom Scott's video titles and the rise in Google searches for 'Shrek'. The unmistakably upward trajectory of the data points underscores the synchronous ascent of interest in 'Shrek' as Tom Scott's titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, lending visual credence to the robust statistical findings.
These findings challenge conventional expectations and beckon further inquiry into the whimsical dynamics of online content and audience engagement. The unexpectedly strong association between clickbait and 'Shrek' underscores the multilayered interactions that underpin the digital milieu, inviting curious minds to delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of online intrigue with a lighthearted spirit and a knowing grin.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the unexpected yet undeniable connection between Tom Scott's clickbait-y YouTube video titles and the public's fervent interest in 'Shrek'. The statistical analysis has unequivocally demonstrated a robust positive association between the two, leaving us with a tantalizing portrait of the whimsical dance between linguistic seduction and ogre-related pursuits. As we wrap up this peculiar odyssey through the digital ether, it is evident that the capricious world of online content and human behavior continues to surprise us with its confounding correlations and sheer absurdity. Our findings not only emphasize the intricate dynamics of clickbait and Shrek worship but also, in true jest, advocate for a lighthearted exploration of the unusual connections that punctuate the digital landscape.

The results of this research, while undeniably amusing, also delve into the curious intersection of human curiosity and linguistic temptation, painting a colorful portrayal of the serendipitous bonds that bind seemingly incongruous elements together. Nonetheless, in the spirit of academic rigor and perhaps a hint of mischief, we dare to assert that no further inquiry is needed in this delightful yet unexpected realm of clickbait and 'Shrek'. After all, as the adage goes, "All good things come to an end" – even the whimsical pursuit of peculiar connections in the digital realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Linguistics and Popular Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Internet Influencer Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Clickbait-y Connection: Tom Scott's Tantalizing Titles and the Surprisingly Strong Search for 'Shrek' with an abstract of The interplay between online content and user engagement has become a subject of increasing interest in the digital age. In this study, we endeavor to shed light on a peculiar phenomenon that begs the question: is there a correlation between the clickbait-iness of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles and the public's interest in the iconic green ogre, 'Shrek'? Leveraging advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of Tom Scott's video titles and comprehensive data from Google Trends, we sought to uncover a potential link between these seemingly disparate entities.
Through meticulous examination of video titles released from 2009 to 2023, a remarkable association emerged, indicating a correlation coefficient of 0.9203884 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as Tom Scott's video titles veer towards the clickbait spectrum, there is a marked surge in Google searches for 'Shrek', defying conventional expectations. The implications of this intriguing correlation extend beyond mere amusement, prompting further inquiry into the intricate dynamics of online content and audience behavior.
This investigation not only offers a whimsical perspective on the digital landscape but also underscores the unexpected connections that underlie the contemporary online experience. As researchers delve deeper into the enigmatic realm of digital interactions, the enigma of clickbait and its curious consequences continues to present fertile ground for exploration.

ChatGPT:

Tom Scott, YouTube, clickbait, user engagement, online content, artificial intelligence, AI analysis, Google Trends, correlation, YouTube video titles, Google searches, Shrek, digital interactions, audience behavior, online experience, digital landscape

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How clickbait-y Tom Scott YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of Tom Scott's YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are

Google searches for 'shrek'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'shrek' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'shrek'

Correlation r = 0.9203884 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8471148 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'shrek') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are) over the 15 years from 2009 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000011639469754384213000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 859,146 random variables You don't actually need 859 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score)4.684285.66674.53.82614.66673.91033.92773.88894.67194.77974.30365.15695.23085.1509
Google searches for 'shrek' (Rel. search volume)8.1666719.333310.66679.166678.333339.916679.083338.833338.59.4166710.166710.751112.7512.8889




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.6842,8,5.6667,4.5,3.8261,4.6667,3.9103,3.9277,3.8889,4.6719,4.7797,4.3036,5.1569,5.2308,5.1509,])
array_2 = np.array([8.16667,19.3333,10.6667,9.16667,8.33333,9.91667,9.08333,8.83333,8.5,9.41667,10.1667,10.75,11,12.75,12.8889,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y Tom Scott's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'shrek'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 8071 · Black Variable ID: 25461 · Red Variable ID: 1480
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0