about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,818 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the rhetoric about freedom and minimal government intervention revved up, it inadvertently applied the brakes to the automotive industry's attention to detail. This led to a swell in parking brake malfunctions as manufacturers were seemingly inspired by the concept of limited regulation. Remember, when it comes to elections and automotive safety, sometimes the correlation is truly parking brake-thtaking.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Florida parking lot in a high-tech style, with cars adorned with striking "Vote Libertarian" bumper stickers. Some of the vehicles display signs of malfunctioning parking brakes due to automotive recalls, creating a stark contrast between the call for minimal government intervention and the safety concerns. The scene should be depicted with a futuristic and sleek aesthetic, utilizing modern visual elements to convey the juxtaposition in a visually engaging manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Surrealism Celtic art Cute cartoon High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake, in the following situation: As the rhetoric about freedom and minimal government intervention revved up, it inadvertently applied the brakes to the automotive industry's attention to detail. This led to a swell in parking brake malfunctions as manufacturers were seemingly inspired by the concept of limited regulation. Remember, when it comes to elections and automotive safety, sometimes the correlation is truly parking brake-thtaking.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Florida, amidst the fervor of the presidential election, a parking lot filled with cars that had "Vote Libertarian" bumper stickers displayed prominently. However, several of these cars were also affected by automotive recalls for parking brake issues, with some of them showing signs of malfunctioning brakes. The juxtaposition of the political support for minimal government intervention and the resulting automotive safety concerns was starkly evident in this scene.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Florida, amidst the fervor of the presidential election, a parking lot filled with cars that had "Vote Libertarian" bumper stickers displayed prominently. However, several of these cars were also affected by automotive recalls for parking brake issues, with some of them showing signs of malfunctioning brakes. The juxtaposition of the political support for minimal government intervention and the resulting automotive safety concerns was starkly evident in this scene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Florida parking lot in a high-tech style, with cars adorned with striking "Vote Libertarian" bumper stickers. Some of the vehicles display signs of malfunctioning parking brakes due to automotive recalls, creating a stark contrast between the call for minimal government intervention and the safety concerns. The scene should be depicted with a futuristic and sleek aesthetic, utilizing modern visual elements to convey the juxtaposition in a visually engaging manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida positively influenced Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues

Journal of Comparative Political Car Troubles

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8964592 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the curious connection between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the Sunshine State. By analyzing the robust dataset from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we discovered a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between individual political leanings and vehicular safety highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research underscores the importance of applying statistical analysis not only to serious political and mechanical concerns, but also to uncovering amusing correlations that lend a peculiar twist to academic inquiry. We hope our findings illuminate the need for further investigation into the unpredictable intersections of politics and automotive engineering, and perhaps offer a lighthearted reminder to always "brake for liberty" in both the civic and vehicular realms.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the curious connection between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the Sunshine State. By analyzing the robust dataset from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we discovered a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between individual political leanings and vehicular safety highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research underscores the importance of applying statistical analysis not only to serious political and mechanical concerns, but also to uncovering amusing correlations that lend a peculiar twist to academic inquiry. We hope our findings illuminate the need for further investigation into the unpredictable intersections of politics and automotive engineering, and perhaps offer a lighthearted reminder to always "brake for liberty" in both the civic and vehicular realms.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ah, the quirky world of statistical research! Who would have thought that political affiliations and automotive malfunctions could intertwine in such an unexpected manner? Brace yourselves for a ride through our exciting findings as we delve into the delightfully bizarre correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Yes, we are breaking new ground in the field of statistical analysis with our investigation titled "Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues."

First, let's pump the brakes and take a moment to appreciate the irony of this study. We are venturing into uncharted territories, using robust datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT to uncover the peculiar connection between political inclinations and vehicular safety concerns in the Sunshine State. It's like playing a game of political roulette while dancing on the edge of a parking brake malfunction – a harrowing but undeniably exhilarating pursuit.

As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors for a whimsical exploration of correlation coefficients and p-values that will leave you both bewildered and amused. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. As the statistical stars aligned, we couldn't help but marvel at the unexpected dance between political freedom and automotive safety in the state known for its sun-soaked days and peculiar happenings.

In the annals of academic research, this study is a testament to the awe-inspiring strangeness that can be unveiled through the lens of statistics. It serves as a reminder that even the most unrelated domains can entwine in a waltz of unforeseen connections, leaving us scratching our heads and chuckling at the marvels of scholarly scrutiny.

So, get ready to join us on this joyride through the quirky corridors of research, where political choices and parking brake predicaments converge in a statistical tango unlike any other. Set aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you pondering the whimsical nature of academic inquiry. After all, sometimes, amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, a dash of levity and unexpected correlations can make the ride all the more fun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the curious connection between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the Sunshine State. By analyzing the robust dataset from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we discovered a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between individual political leanings and vehicular safety highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research underscores the importance of applying statistical analysis not only to serious political and mechanical concerns, but also to uncovering amusing correlations that lend a peculiar twist to academic inquiry. We hope our findings illuminate the need for further investigation into the unpredictable intersections of politics and automotive engineering, and perhaps offer a lighthearted reminder to always "brake for liberty" in both the civic and vehicular realms.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the quirky world of statistical research! Who would have thought that political affiliations and automotive malfunctions could intertwine in such an unexpected manner? Brace yourselves for a ride through our exciting findings as we delve into the delightfully bizarre correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Yes, we are breaking new ground in the field of statistical analysis with our investigation titled "Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues."
First, let's pump the brakes and take a moment to appreciate the irony of this study. We are venturing into uncharted territories, using robust datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT to uncover the peculiar connection between political inclinations and vehicular safety concerns in the Sunshine State. It's like playing a game of political roulette while dancing on the edge of a parking brake malfunction – a harrowing but undeniably exhilarating pursuit.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors for a whimsical exploration of correlation coefficients and p-values that will leave you both bewildered and amused. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. As the statistical stars aligned, we couldn't help but marvel at the unexpected dance between political freedom and automotive safety in the state known for its sun-soaked days and peculiar happenings.
In the annals of academic research, this study is a testament to the awe-inspiring strangeness that can be unveiled through the lens of statistics. It serves as a reminder that even the most unrelated domains can entwine in a waltz of unforeseen connections, leaving us scratching our heads and chuckling at the marvels of scholarly scrutiny.
So, get ready to join us on this joyride through the quirky corridors of research, where political choices and parking brake predicaments converge in a statistical tango unlike any other. Set aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you pondering the whimsical nature of academic inquiry. After all, sometimes, amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, a dash of levity and unexpected correlations can make the ride all the more fun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The unexpected correlation between political preferences and automotive safety concerns has sparked widespread curiosity and a fair share of eyebrow-raising among the scholarly community. This section will explore the existing literature related to our study, starting with serious academic findings and gradually veering into the whimsical and bizarre.

Smith, in "Statistical Analysis of Political Affiliations and Consumer Behavior," presents a comprehensive examination of the relationship between political ideologies and consumer choices. While the focus is on purchasing patterns, the study delves into the broader implications of individual preferences and decision-making processes. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Elections and Economic Indicators: A Multifaceted Analysis," shed light on the intricate connections between electoral outcomes and economic variables, demonstrating the far-reaching impact of political leanings on diverse aspects of society.

Turning to non-fiction books, "The Art of Political Car Maintenance" by Jane Wheeler provides a thought-provoking exploration of the parallels between political engagement and the maintenance of automobiles. Wheeler's insights offer a compelling perspective on the intersection of civic participation and mechanical upkeep, setting the stage for our unconventional investigation.

In the realm of fiction, "The Brake for Liberty Chronicles" by A. Novel takes readers on a rollicking adventure through a world where political allegiances determine the reliability of parking brakes. This satirical take on societal dynamics and automotive quirks underscores the humorous potential lurking within seemingly incongruent topics.

Furthermore, "The Libertarian's Guide to Parking Brake Malfunctions" by R. Reader humorously blends political philosophy with vehicular mishaps, offering tongue-in-cheek remedies for the perplexing intersection of libertarian ideals and parking brake conundrums.

In addition to literary works, several movies provide tangentially related entertainment. "Brake the Vote: The Political Car Chase" offers a thrilling journey through the world of high-speed chases and electoral drama, hinting at the adrenaline-pumping excitement of fusing politics and automotive prowess. "Libertarian Rush: Highway to Freedom" brings a lighthearted touch to the intersection of political ideologies and the open road, weaving a tale of unexpected alliances and vehicular escapades.

As we venture deeper into the curious relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls for parking brake issues, these multidisciplinary perspectives set the stage for our own study, exemplifying the delightful unforeseen connections achievable through scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the curious connection between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the Sunshine State. By analyzing the robust dataset from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we discovered a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between individual political leanings and vehicular safety highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research underscores the importance of applying statistical analysis not only to serious political and mechanical concerns, but also to uncovering amusing correlations that lend a peculiar twist to academic inquiry. We hope our findings illuminate the need for further investigation into the unpredictable intersections of politics and automotive engineering, and perhaps offer a lighthearted reminder to always "brake for liberty" in both the civic and vehicular realms.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the quirky world of statistical research! Who would have thought that political affiliations and automotive malfunctions could intertwine in such an unexpected manner? Brace yourselves for a ride through our exciting findings as we delve into the delightfully bizarre correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Yes, we are breaking new ground in the field of statistical analysis with our investigation titled "Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues."
First, let's pump the brakes and take a moment to appreciate the irony of this study. We are venturing into uncharted territories, using robust datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT to uncover the peculiar connection between political inclinations and vehicular safety concerns in the Sunshine State. It's like playing a game of political roulette while dancing on the edge of a parking brake malfunction – a harrowing but undeniably exhilarating pursuit.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors for a whimsical exploration of correlation coefficients and p-values that will leave you both bewildered and amused. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. As the statistical stars aligned, we couldn't help but marvel at the unexpected dance between political freedom and automotive safety in the state known for its sun-soaked days and peculiar happenings.
In the annals of academic research, this study is a testament to the awe-inspiring strangeness that can be unveiled through the lens of statistics. It serves as a reminder that even the most unrelated domains can entwine in a waltz of unforeseen connections, leaving us scratching our heads and chuckling at the marvels of scholarly scrutiny.
So, get ready to join us on this joyride through the quirky corridors of research, where political choices and parking brake predicaments converge in a statistical tango unlike any other. Set aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you pondering the whimsical nature of academic inquiry. After all, sometimes, amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, a dash of levity and unexpected correlations can make the ride all the more fun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the enigmatic relationship between voting patterns and automotive safety concerns, our research team adopted a multifaceted approach that combined the precision of a political compass with the analytical prowess of a diagnostic tool. As we embarked on our statistical sleuthing, we channeled the spirit of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, ready to navigate the perplexing conundrum of libertarian votes and parking brake predicaments.

Data Collection:

In our pursuit of statistical enlightenment, we scoured the virtual landscape, wielding our data-harvesting tools like intrepid cyber-surfers. Our primary sources of information included the venerable MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation. Like digital treasure hunters, we braved the labyrinthine corridors of the internet to retrieve electoral data encompassing the presidential elections in Florida from 1980 to 2020. Simultaneously, we delved into the annals of automotive history, mining the enigmatic records of parking brake-related recalls from official governmental archives and industry databases. Our quest for data was akin to threading a needle in a haystack, but with digital breadcrumbs leading the way.

Data Processing:

Once we amassed our trove of electoral and automotive data, our team of analytical acrobats leaped into action, flexing their statistical muscles to ensure the raw numbers were primed for an illuminating tango. We scrubbed the datasets with meticulous precision, cleansing them of any extraneous variables and anomalies that dared to taint the purity of our inquiry. Applying the rigorous principles of data hygiene, we meticulously pruned, sorted, and standardized the data, transforming it into a harmonious ensemble ready to perform a statistical ballet.

Quantitative Analysis:

With our datasets polished and prepped, we harnessed the formidable power of statistical analysis to unravel the enigmatic dance between political proclivities and vehicular vulnerabilities. Armed with an arsenal of statistical software akin to a maestro's baton, we orchestrated a grand symphony of correlation coefficients and significance levels, coaxing the raw data to reveal its hidden melodies. Our analytical odyssey led us to the moment of revelation, as the unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8964592 pirouetted into the spotlight, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01. The statistical stage was set, and the findings waltzed into the limelight, leaving us both astonished and amused by the unexpected harmony between liberty-seeking votes and parking brake recalls.

Conclusion:

In the whimsical realm of statistical inquiry, our methodology served as the compass guiding us through uncharted territories of academic exploration. Our data collection imbued our research with the rich tapestry of electoral history and automotive tribulations, while the rigorous processing and quantitative analysis wove a narrative that illuminated the hitherto obscured connection between political choices and vehicular safety concerns. As we bid adieu to the vicissitudes of statistical discovery, our fingers crossed many other peculiar correlations await their turn under the spotlight of academic scrutiny.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8964592, r-squared of 0.8036391, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the curious connection between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the Sunshine State. By analyzing the robust dataset from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we discovered a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between individual political leanings and vehicular safety highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research underscores the importance of applying statistical analysis not only to serious political and mechanical concerns, but also to uncovering amusing correlations that lend a peculiar twist to academic inquiry. We hope our findings illuminate the need for further investigation into the unpredictable intersections of politics and automotive engineering, and perhaps offer a lighthearted reminder to always "brake for liberty" in both the civic and vehicular realms.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the quirky world of statistical research! Who would have thought that political affiliations and automotive malfunctions could intertwine in such an unexpected manner? Brace yourselves for a ride through our exciting findings as we delve into the delightfully bizarre correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Yes, we are breaking new ground in the field of statistical analysis with our investigation titled "Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues."
First, let's pump the brakes and take a moment to appreciate the irony of this study. We are venturing into uncharted territories, using robust datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT to uncover the peculiar connection between political inclinations and vehicular safety concerns in the Sunshine State. It's like playing a game of political roulette while dancing on the edge of a parking brake malfunction – a harrowing but undeniably exhilarating pursuit.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors for a whimsical exploration of correlation coefficients and p-values that will leave you both bewildered and amused. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. As the statistical stars aligned, we couldn't help but marvel at the unexpected dance between political freedom and automotive safety in the state known for its sun-soaked days and peculiar happenings.
In the annals of academic research, this study is a testament to the awe-inspiring strangeness that can be unveiled through the lens of statistics. It serves as a reminder that even the most unrelated domains can entwine in a waltz of unforeseen connections, leaving us scratching our heads and chuckling at the marvels of scholarly scrutiny.
So, get ready to join us on this joyride through the quirky corridors of research, where political choices and parking brake predicaments converge in a statistical tango unlike any other. Set aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you pondering the whimsical nature of academic inquiry. After all, sometimes, amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, a dash of levity and unexpected correlations can make the ride all the more fun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our foray into the statistical wonderland revealed a remarkable correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.8964592 left us marveling at the unexpected dance between individual political inclinations and vehicular safety concerns. It seems that while some people were advocating for "braking free," others may have been experiencing literal braking issues. That's quite a parking predicament, isn't it?

Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures this intriguing relationship, showcasing the strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. One can't help but appreciate the statistical poetry in motion as political preferences and parking brake problems converge on the same graph. It's like watching a ballet performance where political ideologies and automotive defects pirouette in perfect harmony, defying conventional expectations.

The r-squared value of 0.8036391 emphasized the substantial influence of libertarian votes on automotive recalls for parking brake issues. Such a high r-squared value indicates that approximately 80% of the variation in parking brake recalls can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate. It's as if every vote cast for liberty in the political realm sent a subtle message to the automotive industry, triggering an unusual ballet of parking brake malfunctions in Florida.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings held strong statistical significance, reinforcing the validity of this unexpected relationship. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to illuminate this peculiar correlation, leaving us in awe of the myriad ways in which statistical analysis can knit together the most unexpected bedfellows.

In conclusion, our findings not only add a dash of whimsy to the often austere domain of statistical research but also showcase the uncanny interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our study prompts a reimagining of academic inquiry, reminding us that statistical analysis can unveil unexpected correlations that tread the fine line between scholarly scrutiny and sheer amusement. It's a reminder that in the labyrinth of research, even the most peculiar intersections can lead to profound revelations – and a good dose of laughter along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the curious connection between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the Sunshine State. By analyzing the robust dataset from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we discovered a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between individual political leanings and vehicular safety highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research underscores the importance of applying statistical analysis not only to serious political and mechanical concerns, but also to uncovering amusing correlations that lend a peculiar twist to academic inquiry. We hope our findings illuminate the need for further investigation into the unpredictable intersections of politics and automotive engineering, and perhaps offer a lighthearted reminder to always "brake for liberty" in both the civic and vehicular realms.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The unexpected correlation between political preferences and automotive safety concerns has sparked widespread curiosity and a fair share of eyebrow-raising among the scholarly community. This section will explore the existing literature related to our study, starting with serious academic findings and gradually veering into the whimsical and bizarre.
Smith, in "Statistical Analysis of Political Affiliations and Consumer Behavior," presents a comprehensive examination of the relationship between political ideologies and consumer choices. While the focus is on purchasing patterns, the study delves into the broader implications of individual preferences and decision-making processes. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Elections and Economic Indicators: A Multifaceted Analysis," shed light on the intricate connections between electoral outcomes and economic variables, demonstrating the far-reaching impact of political leanings on diverse aspects of society.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Art of Political Car Maintenance" by Jane Wheeler provides a thought-provoking exploration of the parallels between political engagement and the maintenance of automobiles. Wheeler's insights offer a compelling perspective on the intersection of civic participation and mechanical upkeep, setting the stage for our unconventional investigation.
In the realm of fiction, "The Brake for Liberty Chronicles" by A. Novel takes readers on a rollicking adventure through a world where political allegiances determine the reliability of parking brakes. This satirical take on societal dynamics and automotive quirks underscores the humorous potential lurking within seemingly incongruent topics.
Furthermore, "The Libertarian's Guide to Parking Brake Malfunctions" by R. Reader humorously blends political philosophy with vehicular mishaps, offering tongue-in-cheek remedies for the perplexing intersection of libertarian ideals and parking brake conundrums.
In addition to literary works, several movies provide tangentially related entertainment. "Brake the Vote: The Political Car Chase" offers a thrilling journey through the world of high-speed chases and electoral drama, hinting at the adrenaline-pumping excitement of fusing politics and automotive prowess. "Libertarian Rush: Highway to Freedom" brings a lighthearted touch to the intersection of political ideologies and the open road, weaving a tale of unexpected alliances and vehicular escapades.
As we venture deeper into the curious relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls for parking brake issues, these multidisciplinary perspectives set the stage for our own study, exemplifying the delightful unforeseen connections achievable through scholarly exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
Our foray into the statistical wonderland revealed a remarkable correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.8964592 left us marveling at the unexpected dance between individual political inclinations and vehicular safety concerns. It seems that while some people were advocating for "braking free," others may have been experiencing literal braking issues. That's quite a parking predicament, isn't it?
Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures this intriguing relationship, showcasing the strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. One can't help but appreciate the statistical poetry in motion as political preferences and parking brake problems converge on the same graph. It's like watching a ballet performance where political ideologies and automotive defects pirouette in perfect harmony, defying conventional expectations.
The r-squared value of 0.8036391 emphasized the substantial influence of libertarian votes on automotive recalls for parking brake issues. Such a high r-squared value indicates that approximately 80% of the variation in parking brake recalls can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate. It's as if every vote cast for liberty in the political realm sent a subtle message to the automotive industry, triggering an unusual ballet of parking brake malfunctions in Florida.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings held strong statistical significance, reinforcing the validity of this unexpected relationship. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to illuminate this peculiar correlation, leaving us in awe of the myriad ways in which statistical analysis can knit together the most unexpected bedfellows.
In conclusion, our findings not only add a dash of whimsy to the often austere domain of statistical research but also showcase the uncanny interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our study prompts a reimagining of academic inquiry, reminding us that statistical analysis can unveil unexpected correlations that tread the fine line between scholarly scrutiny and sheer amusement. It's a reminder that in the labyrinth of research, even the most peculiar intersections can lead to profound revelations – and a good dose of laughter along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our analysis offer a fascinating glimpse into the interplay between political preferences and automotive safety concerns. While our investigation might have seemed like a wild and whimsical pursuit, the correlation coefficient of 0.8964592 lent some surprising weight to the relationship between libertarian votes and parking brake recalls. It's as if the statistical gods decided to pull a quirky prank by orchestrating this unexpected dance between electoral choices and vehicular conundrums.

Building upon the literature review, where we gleefully explored the official and unofficial narratives interweaving politics and parking brakes, our results can be seen as the punchline to a cosmic joke. Jane Wheeler's "The Art of Political Car Maintenance" perhaps inadvertently provided a glimpse into the peculiar reality we've uncovered, where civic participation and mechanical reliability intersect in ways that tickle the fancy of statistical analysis.

It's not just an intriguing statistical feat; it's also a whimsical journey through the multidimensional tapestry of human behavior and societal repercussions. The r-squared value of 0.8036391 emphasized the potent influence of libertarian votes, almost as if each vote exuded a magnetic pull that tugged the automotive industry into a mirthful ballet of parking brake malfunctions. It's as if the voting booth whispered to the parking brakes, "You're free to go – malfunction, that is."

The p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the robustness of this unexpected relationship, as if the statistical universe was nudging us to pay attention to this peculiar correlation. It's like unfolding a map of correlation and stumbling upon an uncharted land where libertarians and parking brakes coexist in gleeful chaos, prompting us to appreciate the whimsy lurking within the solemn halls of statistical inquiry.

In summary, our findings not only affirm the unexpected connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls for parking brake issues but also beckon us to ponder the delightful serendipity inherent in scholarly exploration. It's a reminder that statistical analysis can illuminate the unlikeliest of tandems, leaving us to marvel at the cosmic complexity of the statistical stage – where political aficionados and parking brake enthusiasts pirouette with glee, leaving us to chuckle at the unexpected humor in the serious business of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida and Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the curious connection between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the Sunshine State. By analyzing the robust dataset from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we discovered a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between individual political leanings and vehicular safety highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research underscores the importance of applying statistical analysis not only to serious political and mechanical concerns, but also to uncovering amusing correlations that lend a peculiar twist to academic inquiry. We hope our findings illuminate the need for further investigation into the unpredictable intersections of politics and automotive engineering, and perhaps offer a lighthearted reminder to always "brake for liberty" in both the civic and vehicular realms.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the quirky world of statistical research! Who would have thought that political affiliations and automotive malfunctions could intertwine in such an unexpected manner? Brace yourselves for a ride through our exciting findings as we delve into the delightfully bizarre correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Yes, we are breaking new ground in the field of statistical analysis with our investigation titled "Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues."
First, let's pump the brakes and take a moment to appreciate the irony of this study. We are venturing into uncharted territories, using robust datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT to uncover the peculiar connection between political inclinations and vehicular safety concerns in the Sunshine State. It's like playing a game of political roulette while dancing on the edge of a parking brake malfunction – a harrowing but undeniably exhilarating pursuit.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite you to fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors for a whimsical exploration of correlation coefficients and p-values that will leave you both bewildered and amused. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. As the statistical stars aligned, we couldn't help but marvel at the unexpected dance between political freedom and automotive safety in the state known for its sun-soaked days and peculiar happenings.
In the annals of academic research, this study is a testament to the awe-inspiring strangeness that can be unveiled through the lens of statistics. It serves as a reminder that even the most unrelated domains can entwine in a waltz of unforeseen connections, leaving us scratching our heads and chuckling at the marvels of scholarly scrutiny.
So, get ready to join us on this joyride through the quirky corridors of research, where political choices and parking brake predicaments converge in a statistical tango unlike any other. Set aside your preconceived notions and buckle up for a journey that will leave you pondering the whimsical nature of academic inquiry. After all, sometimes, amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, a dash of levity and unexpected correlations can make the ride all the more fun.

[[RESULTS]]
Our foray into the statistical wonderland revealed a remarkable correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.8964592 left us marveling at the unexpected dance between individual political inclinations and vehicular safety concerns. It seems that while some people were advocating for "braking free," others may have been experiencing literal braking issues. That's quite a parking predicament, isn't it?
Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures this intriguing relationship, showcasing the strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. One can't help but appreciate the statistical poetry in motion as political preferences and parking brake problems converge on the same graph. It's like watching a ballet performance where political ideologies and automotive defects pirouette in perfect harmony, defying conventional expectations.
The r-squared value of 0.8036391 emphasized the substantial influence of libertarian votes on automotive recalls for parking brake issues. Such a high r-squared value indicates that approximately 80% of the variation in parking brake recalls can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate. It's as if every vote cast for liberty in the political realm sent a subtle message to the automotive industry, triggering an unusual ballet of parking brake malfunctions in Florida.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings held strong statistical significance, reinforcing the validity of this unexpected relationship. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to illuminate this peculiar correlation, leaving us in awe of the myriad ways in which statistical analysis can knit together the most unexpected bedfellows.
In conclusion, our findings not only add a dash of whimsy to the often austere domain of statistical research but also showcase the uncanny interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our study prompts a reimagining of academic inquiry, reminding us that statistical analysis can unveil unexpected correlations that tread the fine line between scholarly scrutiny and sheer amusement. It's a reminder that in the labyrinth of research, even the most peculiar intersections can lead to profound revelations – and a good dose of laughter along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the immortal words of Jerry Seinfeld, "What's the deal with political leanings influencing parking brake recalls in Florida?" Our research has uncovered a fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. It's like the universe conducted a social experiment, testing whether advocating for political freedom could inadvertently lead to vehicular confinement.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8964592 left us scratching our heads and reaching for our parking brake with an extra dose of caution. With a p-value that could make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow, our findings point to a strong and unexpected connection between political ideology and automotive reliability. It's like a statistical game of musical chairs, except we're swapping seats with parking brake issues.

Our analysis has not only marveled at this peculiar connection but has also highlighted the need for continued exploration into the whimsical dance of statistical correlations. As much as we'd love to throw caution to the wind and embark on more adventures in the statistical wonderland, our findings present a defensible case of statistical serendipity. Like the unexpected appearance of a clown car at a scientific symposium, the revelation of this correlation serves as a reminder that scholarly inquiry can sometimes lead to lighthearted astonishment.

In light of these revelatory findings, we confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. The curtain has fallen on this statistical amusement park ride, leaving us with an enduring appreciation for the zany tale of political choices and parking brake predicaments. As we bid adieu to this inexplicably entertaining journey, we do so with a twinkle in our eyes, a smile on our faces, and a go-kart full of statistical curiosities that will forever remain parked in our hearts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Comparative Political Car Troubles


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Automotive Research and Libertarian Voting Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Brake for Liberty: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Florida and Automotive Recalls for Parking Brake Issues with an abstract of In this study, we explore the curious connection between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the Sunshine State. By analyzing the robust dataset from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US DOT, we discovered a striking correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Florida and automotive recalls related to parking brake issues. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8964592, with a p-value less than 0.01 over the span of 1980 to 2020. This unexpected relationship between individual political leanings and vehicular safety highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research underscores the importance of applying statistical analysis not only to serious political and mechanical concerns, but also to uncovering amusing correlations that lend a peculiar twist to academic inquiry. We hope our findings illuminate the need for further investigation into the unpredictable intersections of politics and automotive engineering, and perhaps offer a lighthearted reminder to always "brake for liberty" in both the civic and vehicular realms.

ChatGPT:

Florida, Libertarian votes, automotive recalls, parking brake issues, statistical analysis, political preferences, automotive safety, correlation coefficient, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, US DOT, political leanings, vehicular safety, interconnectedness, academic inquiry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida

Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake

Correlation r = 0.8964592 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8036391 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida) over the 10 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00044. 0.0004430119572179247600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.044% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,257 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198819921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida (Percentage of votes)0.8278980.4601250.2837920.4398510.2752760.1576390.2052020.5277922.19790.635413
Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake (Recalls)521666872810




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.827898,0.460125,0.283792,0.439851,0.275276,0.157639,0.205202,0.527792,2.1979,0.635413,])
array_2 = np.array([5,2,1,6,6,6,8,7,28,10,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Florida"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5818 · Black Variable ID: 26077 · Red Variable ID: 1113
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0